factors affecting manure transfers in the midwest

1
Factors Affecting Manure Transfers in the Midwest Factors Affecting Manure Transfers in the Midwest Objectives Objectives Methods Methods Results and Implications Results and Implications 1 College of Business 2 College of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources For further information contact Dr. Laura McCann, e-mail: [email protected] One proposed solution to excess nutrients on some livestock farms is movement to other farms with nutrient deficits (Ribaudo, et al.). Our study examined the feasibility of this solution. Identify the factors that most heavily influence which farmers sell or give their excess manure to other farmers. Estimate typical hauling distances for manure from different livestock types. Examine the prices that farmers are being paid for different types of livestock manure. A survey was sent out to over 3,000 randomly selected livestock farmers in Missouri and Iowa in March and April of 2006. Methodology for the survey process followed Dillman’s model (Dillman). We initially sent out the survey to a test group of 100 farmers. We then sent out the first wave of the final survey with a cover letter, a postage paid return envelope, and a form to fill out to enter into a drawing to win a $200 gift certificate. A reminder postcard was sent, followed two weeks later by a second wave of the complete package, again asking them to participate. The effective response rate was 37.18 percent. Probit regression analysis was used to identify factors affecting whether manure was provided to others. Jessica L. Amidei 1 , Laura M.J. McCann 2 , Haluk Gedikoglu 2 , Robert Broz 2 , John Lory 2 , Ray Massey 2 • Turkey farmers were most likely to provide manure. 13.07% 5.29% 5.44% 26.67% 29.27% 57.63% 81.55% 14.29% 25.00% 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 1 Percentage ofFarm ers W ho Provide TheirM anure to O thers D airy C attle Beef C attle on Feed Beef C ow s Sw ine less than 55lbs Sw ine greaterthan 55lbs Broilers Turkeys Pullets and Layers Other • Over 80 percent of broiler and turkey farmers that provided manure were paid for it. 26.09% 11.11% 25.00% 12.50% 23.33% 82.35% 83.33% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 1 Percentage ofThose Farm ers W ho are Paid forthe M anure Dairy Cattle BeefCattle on Feed BeefCows Swine less than 55lbs Swine greaterthan 55lbs Broilers Turkeys Pullets and Layers Other •Broiler farmers were the most likely to hire a custom applicator. Partially funded through USDA Water Quality 406 Grant 2005-51130-02365 Dillman, D. A. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method . 2 nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2000. Ribaudo, Marc, et al. “Manure Management for Water Quality: Costs to Animal Feeding Operations of Applying Manure Nutrients to Lands.” <http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications /aer824/aer824a.pdf> • Average hauling distance, as well as the range, are shown for each livestock type. o Dairy Cattle: 2.35 miles (0.5 - 10) o Beef Cattle on feed: 2.05 miles (0.5 - 3) o Beef Cows: 2.78 miles (0.25 - 5) o Swine <55lbs: 2.95 miles (0.1 - 12) o Swine >55lbs: 2.65 miles (0.1 - 12) o Broilers: 14.78 miles (0.125 - 80) o Turkeys: 13.66 miles (0.0 - 80) With all other variables in the regression held constant, farmers were significantly more likely to provide manure if: ►they were younger ►the farm was an AFO or CAFO ►they had more animal units or fewer farmed acres ►they didn’t apply fertilizer to their manured fields ►they had broilers or turkeys rather than swine ►they say the smell of manure bothers them and ►they agree that properly managing manure improves water quality. However, cropping system or concern for water quality had no effect. W as the M anure Tested B efore Application 45.69% 44.83% 9.48% Yes No I Don'tKnow •45.69 percent of farmers providing manure to others said that manure was tested before it was applied. • Research needs to find economically feasible ways for farmers to transport their excess manure off of their farm, especially for less dry types of manure, such as that from dairy cattle or swine. 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00% C ustom A pplicatorU sage Farm erProviding M anure Farm erR eceiving M anure C ustom Applicator

Upload: lpe-learning-center

Post on 12-Apr-2017

237 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Factors Affecting Manure Transfers in the Midwest

Factors Affecting Manure Transfers in the MidwestFactors Affecting Manure Transfers in the Midwest

ObjectivesObjectives

MethodsMethods

Results and ImplicationsResults and Implications

1College of Business2College of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources

For further information contact Dr. Laura McCann, e-mail: [email protected]

One proposed solution to excess nutrients on some livestock farms is movement to other farms with nutrient deficits (Ribaudo,

et al.). Our study examined the feasibility of this solution.

Identify the factors that most heavily influence which farmers sell or give their excess manure to other farmers.

Estimate typical hauling distances for manure from different livestock types.

Examine the prices that farmers are being paid for different types of livestock manure.

A survey was sent out to over 3,000 randomly selected livestock farmers in Missouri and Iowa in March and April of 2006.

Methodology for the survey process followed Dillman’s model (Dillman). We initially sent out the survey to a test group of 100 farmers. We then sent out the first wave of the final survey with a cover letter, a postage paid return envelope, and a form to fill out to enter into a drawing to win a $200 gift certificate. A reminder postcard was sent, followed two weeks later by a second wave of the complete package, again asking them to participate.

The effective response rate was 37.18 percent.

Probit regression analysis was used to identify factors affecting whether manure was provided to others.

Jessica L. Amidei1, Laura M.J. McCann2, Haluk Gedikoglu2, Robert Broz2, John Lory2, Ray Massey2

• Turkey farmers were most likely to provide manure.

13.07%

5.29% 5.44%

26.67%29.27%

57.63%

81.55%

14.29%

25.00%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

1

Percentage of Farmers Who Provide Their Manure to Others

Dairy CattleBeef Cattle on FeedBeef CowsSwine less than 55lbsSwine greater than 55lbsBroilersTurkeysPullets and LayersOther

• Over 80 percent of broiler and turkey farmers that provided manure were paid for it.26.09%

11.11%

25.00%

12.50%

23.33%

82.35% 83.33%

0.00% 0.00%0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

1

Percentage of Those Farmers Who are Paid for the Manure

Dairy Cattle

Beef Cattle on Feed

Beef Cows

Swine less than 55lbs

Swine greater than 55lbs

Broilers

Turkeys

Pullets and Layers

Other

• Broiler farmers were the most likely to hire a custom applicator.

Partially funded through USDA Water Quality 406 Grant 2005-51130-02365

Dillman, D. A. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2000.

Ribaudo, Marc, et al. “Manure Management for Water Quality: Costs to Animal Feeding Operations of Applying Manure Nutrients to Lands.” <http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications /aer824/aer824a.pdf>

• Average hauling distance, as well as the range, are shown for each livestock type.

o Dairy Cattle: 2.35 miles (0.5 - 10)

o Beef Cattle on feed: 2.05 miles (0.5 - 3)

o Beef Cows: 2.78 miles (0.25 - 5)

o Swine <55lbs: 2.95 miles (0.1 - 12)

o Swine >55lbs: 2.65 miles (0.1 - 12)

o Broilers: 14.78 miles (0.125 - 80)

o Turkeys: 13.66 miles (0.0 - 80)

With all other variables in the regression held constant, farmers were significantly more likely to provide manure if:

►they were younger

►the farm was an AFO or CAFO

►they had more animal units or fewer farmed acres

►they didn’t apply fertilizer to their manured fields

►they had broilers or turkeys rather than swine

►they say the smell of manure bothers them and

►they agree that properly managing manure improves water quality.

However, cropping system or concern for water quality had no effect.

Was the Manure Tested Before Application

45.69%

44.83%

9.48%

Yes

No

I Don't Know

• 45.69 percent of farmers providing manure to others said that manure was tested before it was applied.

• Research needs to find economically feasible ways for farmers to transport their excess manure off of their farm, especially for less dry types of manure, such as that from dairy cattle or swine.

0.00%

10.00%20.00%30.00%

40.00%

50.00%60.00%70.00%

80.00%90.00%

100.00%

Custom Applicator Usage

Farmer Providing ManureFarmer Receiving ManureCustom Applicator