fact finding on social security 1

7/28/2019 Fact Finding on Social Security 1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fact-finding-on-social-security-1 1/8

Commentary

Like 24

About the Author

Morningstar columnist Mark Miller writes about

trends in retirement, aging, and the economy. He

is the author of The Hard Times Guide to

Retirement Security: Practical Strategies for

Money, Work and Living, and writes a syndicatedcolumn for Reuters. Mark blogs at

RetirementRevised.com Twitter: @retirerevised.

Contact Author | Meet other investing specialists

Fact Finding on Social Security

Retirement columnist Mark Miller responds to reader feedback about

his recent Social Security myths commentary.

By Mark Miller | 09-14-12 | 06:00 AM | Email Article

"Facts are stubborn things," John Adams said in 1770. My recent Morningstar

column on myths and facts swirling around the Social Security system stirred quite

a bit of passionate political debate, judging by the comments posted to the article.

But even amid stark

disagreement, at the core of

the system are certain facts

that can be useful to any

investor trying to understand

Social Security and where it

fits into his or her retirement

plans. Several aspects of the

program are worthy of debate,

and by clarifying the facts, I

hope to make those

conversations more productive.

In that spirit, and in response to some of the most interesting comments from

readers of my first article, here are some further facts on Social Security.

Most Active Stocks

Ticker Price($) Change(%)

Morningstar

Rating

Morningstar

Analyst Report

NOK 3.56 7.55

RIMM 11.66 13.65

BAC 9.90 1.33

MSFT 27.70 2.78

INTC 19.72 1.86

GE 21.04 1.74

FB 24.00 -1.32

HPQ 12.44 4.19

PFE 24.53 0.74

T 34.36 1.51

With Morningstar Analyst reports you can get our expert Buy/Sell

opinions on over 3,900 Stock and Funds

Print Comment Recommend (5)

Video Reports

Welcome!Company SiteLog InSubscribeRegister

Membership Portfolio Stocks Bonds Funds ETFs CEFs Markets Tools Real Life Finance DiscussHome

Fact Finding on Social Security http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=567437

1 of 8 11/23/2012 7:04 PM



Stocks by: Name| Ticker| Star Rating| Market Cap| Stock Type| Sector| Industry

Mutual Funds by: Star Rating| Investment Style| Total Assets| Category| Top Holdings| Top Sectors| Symbol / Ticker| Name

ETFs by: Star Rating| Category| Total Assets| Symbol / Ticker| Name Articles by: Title | Date| Author| Collection| Interest| Popularity

Investment Categories by: Topic| Sector| Key Indicators| User Interest| Market Cap| Industry

Premium Stocks by: Name| Ticker| Star Rating| Market Cap| Stock Type| Sector| Industry

Premium Mutual Funds by: Star Rating| Investment Style| Total Assets| Category| Top Holdings| Top Sectors | Symbol / Ticker| Name

Premium ETFs by: Star Rating| Category| Total Assets| Symbol / Ticker| Name Popular Articles by: Title | Date| Author| Collection| Interest| Popularity

Popular Investment Categories by: Topic| Sector| Key Indicators| User Interest| Market Cap| Industry

I.O.U.s

Social Security critics argue that the Social Security Trust Fund is an accountinggimmick because its assets have been lent to the government via special-issue

Treasury bonds. I pointed out that the bonds are "full faith and credit" obligations

of the government--therefore, they are real assets.

"How can you possibly believe that the special-issue bonds represent real assets?"

writes John Dewey in a typical response. "The special-issue bonds are nothing

more than IOUs from one part of the government (the taxpayers) to another.

There is nothing in current law that requires these bonds to ever be redeemed."

In fact, under federal law, the financial assets held by the retirement and disability

trust funds can be used only to meet the obligations of these programs. (See

Section 201(d) of the Social Security Act.)

It's also important to understand that the special notes aren't just sitting in a

vault--they are being redeemed regularly. Steve Goss, chief actuary of the Social

Security Administration, describes the process:

"New bonds are purchased every day from the revenue coming into the

government, and they are credited to the trust funds. Similarly, whenever any

money is expended from the trust funds, for benefits or for any administrative

expenses, this comes from redeeming bonds. So, bonds are issued and redeemed

all the time.

More Videos...

Corrections Help Advertising Opportunit ies Licensing Opportunit ies Glossary RSS Mobile Portfolio Affiliate Careers Company News

Internat ional Sites: Australia Canada China France Germany Hong Kong Italy The Netherlands Norway Spain U.K. Switzerland India Finland

Independent. Insightful. Trusted. Morningstar provides stock market analysis; equity, mutual fund, and ETF research, ratings, and picks; portfolio tools; and option, hedge fund, IRA, 401k, and 529plan research. Our reliable data and analysis can help both experienced enthusiasts and newcomers.

© Copyright 2012 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Please read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, Nasdaq, and Morningstar Index (MarketBarometer) quotes are real-time.

Site Directory Site Map Our Products


2 of 8 11/23/2012 7:04 PM



"This is significant because there is a strict rule on the priority order for

redemption of bonds. Anytime a bond is redeemed, we redeem from among those

bonds with the shortest remaining duration to maturity, and redeem the bond from

that group that has the lowest interest rate. New bonds issued are always issued

with an interest rate compounded semiannually at the average effective market

yield determined by the Treasury Department at the close of the prior month for all

outstanding marketable Treasury securities that are due or callable four years or

more in the future. We also have specific procedures for the term of bond issuesand the date of rollover."

Although most trust fund assets are held in the special Treasury notes, Goss says

that the key legal requirement is that the funds be invested in interest-bearing

securities "backed as to principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the U.S.

government."

The trust funds don't have to invest solely in special-issue bonds and have not

always done so in the past. "Marketable Treasury securities and some mortgage-

backed securities also qualify, but none are held by the trust funds currently," he

says. For more on this, see Social Security Administration actuarial note 142--the

first memo on this page.

Why doesn't the trust fund also invest in corporate bonds or stocks? Politics.

When the Social Security Act was passed in 1935, the original intent was to invest

in al l kinds of private-sector assets--an idea that sparked resistance from

conservatives, who disliked the socialistic implications of having the government

invest directly in the private sector.

Senator Arthur Vandenberg, a Michigan Republican who was a key opponent of

most aspects of the New Deal (but did support the creation of Social Security), wasconcerned that the large trust fund Social Security was expected to build up would

result in a kind of socialism.

"He had a somewhat famous exchange with Arthur Altmeyer, the first chair of the

Social Security Board, in which he asked Altmeyer what the trust fund assets

might be invested in," says Eric Laursen, author of The People's Pension: The War

Against Social Security from Reagan to Obama. Altmeyer replied, in 'social

undertakings such as . . . low-cost housing, schools, hospitals,' and even in

manufacturing 'that could be justified from the point of view of social welfare.'

"That scared the bejeezus out of Vandenberg, who went on to insist that the trust

Most Popular

A Quantitative Ranking of the Biggest Fund Companies

A Conservative Portfolio in 3 Buckets

A Bucketed ETF Portfolio for Moderate Retirees

Create More Income With 'Gamma'

Avoid These 3 Social Security Pitfalls

Click here to view all

Related News

Also in Commentary

Buy a Link Now

Sponsored Links


3 of 8 11/23/2012 7:04 PM



fund be shrunk and invested in Treasury bonds."

We're All Greek Now

Some readers just aren't buying my argument that Social Security can't bankrupt

the federal government because the U.S. government has the power to tax and

print money, unlike the troubled Mediterranean country that is the poster child of

the European sovereign debt crisis.

Inspectorgadget 's comment is typical of the thread: "Essentially [Miller] says, in

several different ways, 'Don't worry, the government owes Social Security all this

money, future taxes can be raised to cover Social Security.' That's the problem,

isn't it? Taxes on whom? On the shrinking workforce to pay for a growing retiree

population? Has this expert looked at the newspaper lately to see news about

Greece (for example), to see where this leads?"

Of course, Greece is a eurozone country, at least for the moment--which means it

is in a monetary union and can't make decisions on its own to print money.

Furthermore, financial markets don't seem to share the reader's concerns.

Ten-year U.S. Treasury notes are yielding about 1.6%--not far off record lows andhardly a rate that any sane investor would accept for 10 years from a borrower

that is headed for bankruptcy. Compare that to recent 6.8% yields on the 10-year

notes of Spain, another stressed eurozone country.

This is not to dismiss the long-range importance of the debt problem for the U.S.

economy--or the inflationary risks inherent in printing money. But the option to

inject liquidity into the market does mitigate the crisis notion of a sudden

bankruptcy where debts cannot be repaid, as we are seeing in Greece and Spain.

Moreover, the market itself is not pricing U.S. sovereign debt anywhere near crisis

levels.

China Syndrome

I argued that Social Security isn't, per se, a contributor to the national debt. In

fact, the program is a lender, not a borrower. Just like the Chinese.

"The truth is that to say Social Security will not be a major, and growing,

contributor to the national debt is simply intellectually dishonest," writes

damich44. "The Social Security Trust is the single largest creditor of the U.S.

government, and it isn't close."

My point on this is simple: debt obligations are debt obligations, whether they are

to a sovereign foreign government or to Social Security. And remember--an


4 of 8 11/23/2012 7:04 PM



Next21Prev

Be Seen. Be Heard. Become a Morningstar Contributor.

Reach a readership of advisors, professionals, and active investors.

Submit your commentaries for publication on Morningstar.com.

Comments 1-10 of 61 Comments

Add a Comment

Please login or register to post a comment.

obligation to Social Security really is an obligation to the American people, who

have "lent" their FICA tax contributions to the government--tax contributions that

were made with the promise that they would be used to fund their future Social

Security benefits.

Social Security's old-age and disability trust funds currently hold $2.7 trillion in

bonds. As of June 2012, the two biggest sovereign holders of U.S. Treasury

obligations were China ($1.164 trillion) and Japan ($1.119 trillion). At $5.292trillion, all foreign sovereign debt holdings dwarf Social Security's holdings.

Log In Register


5 of 8 11/23/2012 7:04 PM

F Fi di S i l S i h // i / i l / i l ?id 567437



SteveM

Sep 14 2012, 6:15 AM

Flag

Mark, you are either a very brave man or a glutton for punishment

to wade into these waters again :-)

kayaker

Sep 14 2012, 7:13 AM

Flag

I just flagged Mainstreet100 as inflammatory - if everyone who has

gone through Medicaid and a nursing home process with a relativedoes the same maybe we can get this ignorant, cruel and insensitive

remark removed.

Mainstreet100

Sep 14 2012, 7:28 AM

Flag

While some right wing philosophy may have intellectual basis most

of it is propoganda fed to parts of the lower class that mysteriously

supports them in the face of what is not best for themselves, at least

financially. I often wonder why? I guess they hate minorities and

are religiously brainwashed about women rights so much that it

overcomes the fact that they will never be the person to benefit

from the economic agenda espoused by the rich. They actually

believe that the freeloaders in our society pay no taxes and that

robs them when they often are un or underemployed and pay little

tax themselves while relying on the benefits they decry. Watch out

right wing if they ever wake up.

capecod

Sep 14 2012, 7:36 AM

Flag

There is no way to overcome the loud, adrenalin-soaked,

hair-on-fire (and sometimes purposeful) misunderstandings about

social security, the national debt, and taxes that have been sparked

and fanned by a decade of the radical politicization of everything in

our society. Facts no longer matter.

yrag46

Sep 14 2012, 7:40 AM

Flag

Mainstreet100..... To the point and well put.

Mainstreet100

Sep 14 2012, 7:41 AM

Flag

Kayaker

I think you misunderstand my post. I am sure that process is soul

draining and was not directed to those that have to do it. It was

directed to the hypocrisy of those that take advantage of it who do

not have to while espousing philosophies ignoring the poor.


6 of 8 11/23/2012 7:04 PM

F t Fi di S i l S it htt // i t / ti l t/ ti l ?id 567437



academic

Sep 14 2012, 8:41 AM

Flag

Mr. Miller describes some details of the mechanics of the SS Trust

Fund to argue that it is an "asset", but none of these details address

the key issue: the existence of this fund does not change the net

financial position of the US federal government at all.

At best, you could try to argue that the trust fund is an accounting

mechanism to determine how much taxpayers "owe" Social

Security. But even that is not correct. The Supreme Court has ruled(e.g. Flemming vs. Nestor, 1960) that Social Security is not a

contractual obligation to SS taxpayers. Rather, it is a spending

program that Congress can revise at any time as it sees fit. So

according to the law, Social Security does not "owe" future

beneficiaries anything. Congress could, if it wished, reduce benefits

at will and never redeem a dime of the "trust fund."

In the setting of these benefits, the trust fund will play at best a

minor role. Yes, its existence will provide some ammunition to

argue in favor of maintaining benefits when SS taxes fall short of

benefits. But it's just a fact that Congress bases its decisions almosttotally on demand from constituents for higher current benefits and

lower current taxes, not rational long-range financial planning.

The only relevance of the "Trust Fund" is that it plays a small role in

the purely political decision of how to adjust benefits in the future.

Other than that, it is meaningless and irrelevant.

polkster0

Sep 14 2012, 8:44 AM

Flag

Mark, how then do you explain President Obama's statements

during the debates over raising the "debt ceiling" last summer? On

several occasions Obama said that if we didn't raise the debt ceiling

by the required date, "we might not be able to send out Social

Security checks". If there are actual assets in a Social Security trust

fund, why would the president of the US say something like that?

Does he know something you don't?

capecod

Sep 14 2012, 8:51 AM

Flag

Yes pollster.....as Treasury cash balances approached zero because

it needed to continue making contractual payments but could not

borrow, its lack of cash would ultimately have made it impossible to

redeem the Treasury debt in SS to supplement or make cash

payments to SS beneficiaries. See, it really isn't the conspiracy

theory of everything if you actually bother to think it through....of


7 of 8 11/23/2012 7:04 PM

F t Fi di S i l S it htt // i t / ti l t/ ti l ?id 567437



course, if that's too much of a challenge....

colorado43

Sep 14 2012, 10:27 AM

Flag

Mark, What has been the fund's real investment return to recipients

on their contributions?Like every other investment, the real return

is calculated by adjusting for inflation.

How will today's low Treasury yields influence the real return?

1-10 of 61 Comments


8 of 8 11/23/2012 7:04 PM

fact finding on social security 1

Documents