facsimiles of text and music from distributed resources

28
Facsimiles of Text and Music From Distributed Resources Benjamin Albritton [email protected] Scholarly Editions and the Digital Age: Text and Music 31 August 2012, Bloomington, IN

Upload: blalbritton

Post on 27-Jun-2015

251 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Presented at Indiana University, Center for the History of Music Theory and Literature, 2012.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Facsimiles of Text and MusicFrom Distributed Resources

Benjamin [email protected]

Scholarly Editions and the Digital Age: Text and Music31 August 2012, Bloomington, IN

Page 2: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Overview

• Brief context of current medieval manuscript interoperability work

• Andrew W. Mellon Foundation• Stanford and partners• What do we mean by “interoperability”?

Page 3: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

The Problem

• Medieval projects as “curated and comprehensive” efforts

• Technical and social silos• Expensive to maintain• Difficult to extend

Page 4: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

The Goal

• Toward a “commons” of distributed resources• Aggregating information and extensibility as

an alternate to “curated and comprehensive”• Allow people to do cool new stuff with our

stuff (without losing our relevance)

Page 5: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Text Repositories

• Long history• Deep inventory• Domain-specific (often)• Some images• Static Interface• …

Page 6: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Image Repositories• A “standard model”• Lots of images• Descriptive metadata• Silo interfaces• Built-in tools• No way to access

outside “stuff” for comparison

• Mediates use• Expensive to maintain

Page 7: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Repository to Repository• One-off sharing• Human-brokered• But:• Expense• Not scalable• What if:• CHMTL wants

images for all MSS of its texts?

• Parker wants texts for all its music theory?

• BNF wants… ?

Parker: CCCC 410 – De speculatione musice

CHMTL: 1970, Corpus scriptorum text of De speculatione musice

Page 8: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

But what about…• Other resources

“about” an object or text

• … stored and served in other places

• … that you might not know about

• How to build extensible facsimiles?

Page 9: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

“Interoperability”• Step 1: Expose resources to

shared tools• Step 2: Enhance resources• Match text to image• Match image to text

• Exposure is low cost• Shared tools let other people

make your stuff better• Specialists build the domain-

specific tools

Page 10: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Step 3: Enhance existing data

Page 11: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Step 4: CHMTL text + Parker image

Page 12: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Digital Facsimiles from Distributed Resources

• Parker image served from Stanford• Text provided by CHMTL• Linkage produced in T-PEN• Data for text re-stored at Los Alamos National

Lab• Re-presented in a new environment that also

allows presentation of even more annotations and links

Page 13: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Aggregating distributed resources

Page 14: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Transcribing from Digital Surrogates

La Terre de Secille

Page 15: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Naïve Approach: Attach Transcription to ImageOne problem example: Multiple Representations

CCC 26 f. iiiR

Page 16: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Naïve Approach: Attach Transcription to ImageOne problem example: Multiple Representations

CCC 26 f. iiiR Fold A Open

Page 17: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Naïve Approach: Attach Transcription to ImageOne problem example: Multiple Representations

CCC 26 f. iiiR Fold A Open Fold A and B Open

Page 18: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Naïve Approach: Attach Transcription to ImageOne problem example: Multiple Representations

CCC 26 f. iiiR Fold A Open Fold A and B Open f. iiiV

Page 19: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

The Shared Canvas

• Represents a real world thing we want to “talk” about

• Has a unique name• http://dms-data.stanford.edu/Parker/CCC026/canvas-12

Page 20: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Facsimiles are “about” a real thing

Page 21: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Parker Image re-served in SharedCanvas viewer

Page 22: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Re-presented with text in side-by-side view…

Page 23: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

… or overlaid

Page 24: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

The Distributed Facsimile

Page 25: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Examples of other resources attached to the facsimile:

• Detail images overlaid

Page 26: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Examples of other resources attached to the facsimile:

• Audio performances of notated music

• Overlaid text transcription

• User-generated comments (public and private)

• Also:• Data sets• Mark-up• Base image

choices

Page 27: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Conclusion

• Distributed resources exist independently of the aggregation – could be re-presented in any UI

• In short:– Expose repository and project data via API and

common data models– Leads to:

• Greater use of repository resources• Sustainability• Enhanced repository data• Cool new uses of the data we’ve already produced

Page 28: Facsimiles of Text and Music from Distributed Resources

Thank You• More Info:

– Benjamin Albritton, Stanford University Libraries• [email protected]

– CHMTL & Dr. Giuliano Di Bacco, Indiana University• http://www.chmtl.indiana.edu/

– SharedCanvas• Author and architect: Robert Sanderson, Los Alamos National Lab

[email protected]

• Description and implementations:– www.shared-canvas.org

– T-PEN• PI: James Ginther (coming up next), Saint Louis University• Try it!

– http://t-pen.org/TPEN

– Slides (within a week)• http://www.stanford.edu/group/dmstech/