f01.justanswer.com€¦ · web viewsection 5 qualifications and resources. section 1 summary....

Proposal to California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle)

Feedstock Conversion Technical Assistance and Material Testing Services

RFP #DRR18039

--Place Holder--

TheActual Cover Page is in a Separate File

September 20, 2018

October 4, 2018

Proposal Review CommitteeCalifornia Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery1001 I StreetSacramento, CA 95814CalRecycle Contracts Unit, MS-19A

Re: Feedstock Conversion Technical Assistance and Material Testing Services, RFP #DRR18069

Dear CalRecycle Proposal Reviewers:

On behalf of our project team, we are pleased to submit this proposal to support CalRecycle in the Feedstock Conversion Technical Assistance and Material Testing Services contract (referred to as Feedstock Conversion Services in this proposal, or FCS). This FCS, in combination with the previous FCS, CalRecycle’s Tire Incentive Program(TIP) and the Tire Outreach and Market Analysis (TOMA and TOMA2) Projects provides the ingredients needed to effectively maximize progress in scrap tire feedstock conversion and use of California tire-derived material (TDM) in the production of manufacturing tire-derived products (TDP) over the coming years.

The FCS “Description of Work” requires that the Contractor work with 8 – 12 California qualified and approved Tire Incentive Program (TIP) eligible manufacturers and products, California TDM feedstock suppliers and provide appropriate technical assistance, resources and material testing services to facilitate the feedstock conversion of products as necessary to support the TIP. In addition to this support, the Contractor is responsible for producing an easy to understand user guide and video regarding ASTM D5644 (test methods to determine tire and industrial rubber particle size) and ASTM D5603 (product (particle size) that results from testing the tire and industrial rubber particle size) and ASTM standard for devulcanized rubber, (if developed). In Task 4 the crumb rubber is to be extracted and collected at the TDM supplier’s facility and the associated manufacturer’s facility to verify the particle size is consistent with the TIP grant program and FCS.

The FCS, a 30-month Agreement, allows for 17 – 19 months for a manufacturer to produce a commercial product. The RFP identified time-frame includes the first 8 – 10 months primarily focusing on Task 2 (identifying and qualifying California manufacturers and products and TDM feedstock suppliers).In the RFP, Task 3, would begin next June – August 2019, after the Contract Manager approves the manufacturer candidates’ technical assistance, material testing and product certification support services and budget to produce the feedstock conversion commercial products. All reports from service providers would need to be provided to the Contractor by mid-February 2021 in order for the Contractor to produce and submit the draft reports that are required by March 1, 2021, and the final reports by April 2021 in Task 5. Our team’s observation and hands on knowledge in developing tire-derived products since 2007 through CalRecycle’s tire-related programs is that it takes on average at least 18-36 months to develop a commercial product.The success of the FCS is dependent on Contract management by the Contractor, CalRecycle and the manufacturers.

Denise Kennedy, President of DK Enterprises, has assembled a team with unmatched qualifications, resources and established working relationships with California TDM feedstock suppliers, TDP manufacturers, other manufacturers that use raw materials (e.g. virgin rubber, plastic, aggregate), testing facilities, compounders, manufacturing technical and material testing specialists, material specialist and firms that specialize in certifications. These relationships are valuable assets and

www.dkenterprises.usPhone (916) 706-38691500 W El Camino Ave STE 143 Sacramento, CA 95833

Letter to CalRecycle Proposal ReviewersOctober 4, 2018Page 2

important components that are needed for FCS success. Ms. Kennedy has provided similar services as a contractor and subcontractor under six separate CalRecycle contracts since 2006, and if selected, will lead all contract activities and assistance services under FCS.

George Savage, CalRecovery, Inc., our FCS team Manufacturer Technical Assistance Management Assistant and Material Specialist, will be involved in each of the five FCS Tasks. In addition, CalRecovery brings its experienced personnel in project management, material handling and solid waste management solutions. Wilson Business Integrators (DBA The Wilson Group), a California Department of General Services (DGS) Small Business/DVBE firm owned by Bruce Wilson, will provide administrative support and project accounting.Randy Russell, RWR Strategies, previous Manager of the TOMA contract and project coordinator under the last Tire-Derived Product Business Assistance Program (TBAP) contract, will provide project support as the Project Coordinator.In addition, our team has received commitments from 17 specialized material testing facilities that performed tests in the previous FCS and the Tire-Derived Product Business Assistance Program. Several more labs have been recommended by interested FCS candidates. Thirteen material specialists have been identified to provide specialized technical assistance and advice related to rubber/plastic manufacturing, quality assurance and control, engineering, process optimization, material surfaces and product development.

We are excited by the opportunity, if selected, to continue our team’s long-standing partnership with CalRecycle in scrap tire market development. We believe several points set our proposal apart:

Drawing on our team’s technical knowledge and hands-on industry experience, we can offer practical insights to overcome anticipated challenges and deliver tangible results;

Our ability to gain the trust of participating TDM feedstock suppliers and product manufacturers is well proven, and we will make ever attempt to leverage our established industry relationships to hit the ground running and to maximize project outcomes;

Our team and CalRecycle have learned it is important to be nimble during the contract to keep making progress. Market development of commercial products is a complex process with many uncertainties and neither our team nor CalRecycle has complete control of the development process nor the manufacturing results;

We are dedicated to ongoing, regular communication with participating manufacturers, service providers and CalRecycle, and we are enthusiastically tenacious in encouraging and helping tire-derived product manufacturers to make progress towards their feedstock conversion goals. In our experience this is the single most important key to feedstock conversion success.

Following is the information specifically required by the RFP to be included in this cover letter:

a. Name and address of the Proposer submitting qualifications: DKE Enterprises, Inc. (DBA DK Enterprises), 1500 W El Camino Ave STE 143, Sacramento, CA 95833

b. Proposer’s Headquarters for purposes of this Contract, if awarded: 1500 W El Camino Ave STE 143, Sacramento, CA 95833

c. Name, telephone number and email address of a person who can be contacted if further information is required: Denise Kennedy, [email protected], (916) 706-3869

mailto:[email protected]

Letter to CalRecycle Proposal ReviewersOctober 4, 2018Page 2

d. Name, title, address, telephone number and email address of individual(s) with authority to negotiate and execute a binding Contract on behalf of the Proposer: Denise Kennedy, President, DKE Enterprises, Inc. (DBA DK Enterprises), 1500 W El Camino Ave, STE 143, Sacramento, CA 95833, [email protected], (916) 706-3869

e. All personnel who will provide services under the Contract will have the required certifications, and qualified personnel are available to meet the service needs of this contract.

f. This proposal was printed entirely on 100 percent post-consumer recycled content paper.

g. DKE Enterprises, Inc. and any Subcontractors to be used during the performance of the contract are eligible to contract with the State of California, pursuant to PCC 10286.

h. Following is requested information on DKE Enterprises, Inc. and proposal subcontractors:Firm Status in

Contract SB/ DVBE

StatusOSDS Reference

Number Issued by DGSDKE Enterprises, Inc. (DBA DK Enterprises) Prime Contractor SB(Micro) 1796777Akron Polymer Technology Services (APTS) SubcontractorAkron Rubber Development Laboratory, Inc. SubcontractorAsphalt Pavement and Recycling Technologies, Inc. SubcontractorCalRecoveryInc (CRI) Subcontractor SB(Micro) 16250Disability Access Consultants Subcontractor SB(Micro) 1448080Hamilton Associates Subcontractor SB(Micro) 2012007IAPMO R & T Lab SubcontractorIntertek / Architectural Testing, Inc. SubcontractorMFM Building Products Corporation SubcontractorMiddleton & Associates SubcontractorMindFlow Design SubcontractorModern Concepts SubcontractorMomentum Technologies International, Inc. SubcontractorNemo ETC, Inc. SubcontractorNGC Testing Services SubcontractorNSL Analytical Services SubcontractorPeter B. Sebaaly SubcontractorPRI Construction Materials Technologies SubcontractorPSI Technologies, Inc. SubcontractorRecycling Research Institute SubcontractorRWR Strategies Subcontractor SB(Micro) 2021439Testing Services, Inc. SubcontractorTwining, Inc. SubcontractorUL LLC SubcontractorWestern Fire Center SubcontractorWestern Regional Superpave Center SubcontractorWilson Business Integrators, Inc. (DBA The Wilson Group)

Subcontractor SB(Micro) DVBE

13486

On behalf of our team, we look forward to working with CalRecycle to take feedstock conversion to the next level, and to foster significant expansion and diversification of California TDP production.

Sincerely,

Denise Kennedy, President, (Authorized to Commit Company Resources)DKE Enterprises, Inc. (DBA DK Enterprises)

Table of Contents1. SUMMARY...............................................................................................................................................4

2. METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................................................9

Task 1: Develop Project Work Plan.........................................................................................................9

Task 2: Identify Prospective Manufacturers, Conduct Marketing Outreach, Develop Individual Manufacturer Activity Plans and Budgets for Participating Manufacturers, and Qualify Processors to Provide Crumb Rubber.........................................................................................................................10

2A. Prepare Prioritized List of Prospective Manufacturers..............................................................10

2B. Conduct Outreach to Manufacturers and Secure Commitments...............................................11

2C. Prepare Activity Plans.................................................................................................................12

2D. Prepare Summary Report and Amend Contract........................................................................14

2E. Qualify Processors.......................................................................................................................15

2F. Qualify Processors.......................................................................................................................16

Task 3: Work with Manufacturers to Execute Individual Manufacturer Activity Plans......................17

Task 4: Crumb Rubber Material Testing..............................................................................................18

Task 5: Reporting.................................................................................................................................19

3. SCENARIOS............................................................................................................................................21

General Approach to All Scenarios.......................................................................................................21

Scenario A.............................................................................................................................................23

Scenario B.............................................................................................................................................26

Scenario C..............................................................................................................................................28

4. ORGANIZATION.....................................................................................................................................31

DK Enterprises.......................................................................................................................................31

Akron Polymer Technology Services (APTS).........................................................................................32

Akron Rubber Development Laboratory, Inc.......................................................................................32

CalRecovery, Inc....................................................................................................................................33

Disability Access Consultants (DAC).....................................................................................................33

Hamilton Associates.............................................................................................................................34

IAPMO R&T Lab.....................................................................................................................................34

Intertek.................................................................................................................................................34

JPS Design Group..................................................................................................................................35

MindFlow Design..................................................................................................................................35

Middleton & Associates........................................................................................................................36

Modern Concepts, Inc...........................................................................................................................36

Momentum Technologies International...............................................................................................36

Page 1

Section 1 Summary

Nemo ETC, Inc.......................................................................................................................................37

NGC Testing Services.............................................................................................................................37

NSL Analytical Services.........................................................................................................................37

PRI Construction Materials Technologies.............................................................................................37

Recycling Research Institute.................................................................................................................38

RWR Strategies.....................................................................................................................................38

Peter B. Sebally, Ph.D...........................................................................................................................39

TUV SUD America..................................................................................................................................39

Twining, Inc...........................................................................................................................................39

UL LLC....................................................................................................................................................40

Western Fire Center..............................................................................................................................40

Wilson Business Integrators, Inc. (DBA The Wilson Group) DVBE.......................................................40

5. QUALIFICATIONS AND RESOURCES......................................................................................................42

Project and Activity Plan Management................................................................................................43

Project Coordination and Support........................................................................................................45

On-Call Technical Assistance Specialists and Advisors.........................................................................45

Product Testing and Certification.........................................................................................................46

APPENDIX A: COST PROPOSAL...................................................................................................................1

Summary and Background Information.................................................................................................1

Attachment A Personnel Rate Sheet......................................................................................................2

Attachment B Cost Proposal Sheet.........................................................................................................2

Attachment B.1 Cost Sheet for Scenario A.............................................................................................2

Attachment B.2 Cost Sheet for Scenario B.............................................................................................2

Attachment B.3 Cost Sheet for Scenario C.............................................................................................2

Attachment D Bidder Declaration..........................................................................................................2

APPENDIX B: ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FORMS, ATTACHMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS.............................1

Qualifications and Licenses.....................................................................................................................1

SBE and DVBE Certifications...................................................................................................................1

Attachment F Darfur Contracting Act...............................................................................1

Attachment G Iran Contracting Act....................................................................................1

Attachment H Contractor Status Form............................................................................1

Attachment J Client References..............................................................................................................1

APPENDIX C: RESUMES...............................................................................................................................1

APPENDIX D: SAMPLES OF WRITTEN WORK..............................................................................................1

Page 2

Section 1 Summary

List of TablesTable 1: Experience Overcomes Challenges...............................................................................................5Table 2: Summary of Proposed Methodology and Schedule.....................................................................6Table 3: Simplified Sample Activity Plan Summary for Whole Products, Scenario A..............................25Table 4: Simplified Sample Activity Plan Summary for Whole Products, Scenario B..............................27Table 5: Simplified Sample Activity Plan Summary for Whole Products, Scenario C..............................30Table 6: Summary of Team Members’ Pertinent Knowledge and Experience........................................41Table 7: Sample of Product Tests Performed for TDPs by BC Team Members Under TBAP...................46

Table A-1 1: Summary of DK Enterprises, Inc. Consulting Proposal Costs.................................................1

Page 3

Section 1 Summary

1. SUMMARYThe Feedstock Conversion Technical Assistance and Material Testing Services (Feedstock Conversion Services, or (FCS) Program works in tandem with CalRecycle’s Tire Incentive Programs (TIP) and the Tire Outreach and Market Analysis (TOMA2) Project to expand and diversify demand for crumb rubber made from California scrap tires. Crumb rubber is an attractive scrap tire end-use because of its high value and use within diverse manufacturing market niches, both of which strengthen the resiliency of scrap tire recycling. Since the major existing markets for crumb rubber have plateaued in recent years, the need for increasing crumb rubber demand through feedstock conversion is more important than ever.

While there is great potential, experience with feedstock conversion efforts to date is mixed. On the plus side, a good number of tire-derived manufacturers with diverse products have applied to the TIP, the previous FCS Contract orCalRecycle programs. As identified in our California Waste Tire Market Report for 2017, crumb rubber volumes have yet to reach their full potential. Higher volumes of Tire-derived material feedstock conversion projects are feasible if we utilize ¼” – ¾” in feedstock conversion projects in addition to using crumb rubber which is smaller than ¼” in size. Above all, experience shows successful feedstock conversion must be driven by customers, and that a sustained commitment is required by manufacturers to overcome challenges related to: new product formulation, defining raw material and product specifications, time frames and adjusting manufacturing practices. The FCS Program is designed to complement the TIP by directly assisting manufacturers to overcome these challenges. TOMA’s market recognizance and outreach to promote tire-derived productswill continue to complement FCS by promoting the feedstock conversion tire-derived product (TDP) that participating manufacturers make, expanding and diversifying markets.

Denise Kennedy, President of DK Enterpriseshas assembled a team with the full range of qualifications and resources needed in the FCS Program. Denise will serve as Project Manager overseeing and managing all aspects of FCS and will be the Manufacturing Technical Assistance Management and Testing/Certification Coordination Lead. George Savage, CaRecovery, Inc. will provide services in each of the tasks with a larger emphasis on Task 2 and Task 3. Randy Russell, Randy Russell Strategies, the Teams Project Coordinator, will provide support as needed and will be responsible for preparing the monthly FCS reports that will be provided to CalRecycle’s Contract Manager.The Wilson Group, our DGS Small Business DVBE company will be responsible for providing administrative and project tracking until their contract with DK Enterprises is fulfilled. In addition, our team includes numerous manufacturing technical assistance service providers and twenty testing facilities that have expressed an interest in participating in the FCS contract based on testing expertise matching the type of tests to be performed. It should be noted, however, that there is the possibility that additional service providers may be contracted to DK Enterprises due to a relationship already developed with the manufacturer of the product that better matches their requirement for technical assistance and/or material testing or certification of the product. If needed, we will also have access to an accredited International Code Council (ICC) inspection team to provide quality control inspections for building construction products. We have commitments from over 30 service providers who are ready to be involved as a service provider given their expertise matches the requirements of the manufacturer and the product.We believe our team can efficiently offer the full range of needed services, but we are prepared to work with additional organizations as required to meet project needs.

Page 4

Section 1 Summary

Three strategies underlie our approach to the FCS project:

Strategy: Strong technical knowledge and practical experience deliver tangible results. Having worked with dozens of TDP manufacturers, including twelveTIP grantees, and over 35 FCS manufacturers. We recruited several of the TIP applicantsthrough our subcontractor role in TOMA and TOMA2. Our team understands the technical, logistical and economic challenges of feedstock conversion (see Table 1 below), as well as the potential benefits to manufacturer brands, sales revenue and cost structures. Our Manufacturing Technical Assistance Managers, manufacturing specialists and material product testing and certification resources are respected and known in the industry and have the proven capacity to provide the assistance and services needed for success.

Table 1: Experience Overcomes Challenges

Challenge ApproachManufacturer skepticism and competing priorities may complicate securing feedstock conversion commitments.

Clearly articulating success stories, proven approaches and program benefits secures commitments.

The issueof crumb rubber chemically bonding with virgin rubber or plastics limits its applications, especially in extrusion molded products.

Outreach to candidate manufacturers focuses on high potential products like compression molded and extruded products that can accommodate filler and retain essential performance characteristics.

Iterative experimentation with alternative crumb rubber and compounds can slow development of initial prototypes.

Experience and familiarity with California crumb producers speeds the supply development process.

Some product tests may take weeks or even months, delaying the ability to firmly establish crumb rubber/compound specifications and launch production during the period of the contract.

Identifying test needs in advance sets expectations and allows the team to coordinate with testing companies early.

Time and resource constraints may slow manufacturer progress.

Regular, ongoing communication keeps responsible parties focused on progress deadlines and allows for needed adjustments.

Beginning the use of crumb rubber requires adjusting current manufacturing practices due to odor, color transfer and production logistics considerations.

Experience allows us to anticipate issues and plan accordingly, alerting production staff to potential issues.

The allocation of limited CalRecycle resources under FCS must be highly effectively and equitable.

The Activity Plan Summary Report clearly justifies proposed resource allocation among participating firms, tied to anticipated results.

Material may not be available if other markets consume the size of rubber that is needed to develop a TDP. Initially in FCS, TDM suppliers would only sell full trailer load of crumb rubber due to their demand for rubber.

Address with CalRecycle utilizing larger particle sizes than crumb rubber (1/4” and finer) to increase volume of use of recycled tire rubber in feedstock conversion projects.

Delays in the Agreement Process with CalRecycle may hinder the ability of the manufacturer to develop the proposed feedstock conversion product in a timely manner.

Work with CalRecycle during the initial agreement phase to address any issues and limit changes to the Agreement.

Strategy: Ongoing, regular communication with participating manufacturers, service providers and CalRecycle results in timely achievement of established objectives and milestones. Activity Plans will clearly identify roles, responsibilities and date-certain objectives. Our job as Activity Plan Managers is to respectfully and enthusiastically keep responsible parties on track, and to identify and overcome obstacles as they may arise. We understand that the keys to success are trust and communication, ever focused on achieving goals.

Strategy: Established industry relationships and lessons learned in previous CalRecycle projects allow us to hit the ground running.

Page 5

Section 1 Summary

Our team has collaborated closely with CalRecycle as we have provided services in three CalRecycle Tire-Derived Product Business Assistance Program (TBAP) contracts, TOMA, TOMA2 and the previous FCS contract. Our enclosed work samples provided in Appendix D highlight this work, including, maximizing TBAP services; feedstock conversion opportunities and barriers;and TDP product development best management practices. We have close working relationships across the industry that have enabled us to secure their market development commitments, successfully deliver assistance services and gather sensitive data.

Table 2 below summarizes our proposed methodology and timeline for completing the project, along with key deliverables and milestones. Our time frame to complete each task is shorter than the timeframe identified in the RFP so as to allow more time by the service providers to assist the final candidate manufacturers develop the feedstock conversion TDP.

Table 2: Summary of Proposed Methodology and Schedule

Task Methodology Outcomes and Target DatesAssume Start Date Acceptance of Agreement and Documentation November 1, 20181. Develop and Finalize Work Plan

A.Contractorto meet with Contract Manager to review the Work Plan provided in the Proposal; fine-tune timelines, tasks,deliverables, including reports, marketing materials, presentations and/or dissemination of information as needed. B.Next, present minor changes if needed to Contract Manager and finalize Work Plan based on CalRecyclecomments and approval.

Kickoff Meeting (November 14, 2018)Draft Work Plan (Draft November 28, 2018) and Finalize Work Plan (December 15, 2018)

2A.Identify Prospective Manufacturers, Conduct Mark and Prepare Prioritized List of Candidate Manufacturers

Research and identify prospective California manufacturers that meet the eligibility criteria of the TIP grant. Create prioritized list from prior networking and industry resources and interested persons in FCS Project. Contact manufacturers, compounders, material specialist, testing facilities, and TDM suppliers; prior FCS manufacturers; reach out to association memberships of project manager and service providers; contact Blue Book Building & Construction Network; email digital FCS brochure to potential candidates and follow-up with phone call; utilize lists developed through TOMA, reach out to contacts from TOMA and TOMA2 Outreach efforts and online resources; online sources; add candidate firms identified through industry contacts. Prioritize the list prior to outreach through Internet research and limited calls to verify business activities. Focus on known priorities based on referrals and other information where possible.

Prioritized prospect list (Draft January 15, 2019). Final list to be approved by Contract Manager(January 15, 2018; Final January 29, 2019)

2B. Conduct Outreach Marketing Material and Secure Commitments

Prepare concise digital FCS Program brochure that can be used as a marketing tool through emails and/or downloaded as a handout. The brochure will communicate the program benefits and processes to be used in discussions with targeted prospective manufacturers and targeted decision makers. Prepare and present a candidate questionnaire to Contract Manager for review and approval which was used in the previous FCS. The qualifying questionnaire reduces initial travel and meeting time to see if a candidate manufacturer meets the first and sometimes second round of qualifying questions.Contractor shall then execute meetings that have been approved by the Contract Manager. Intent will be to confirm eligibility, solicit interest and secure commitment. Team will contact top 20 candidates with a goal to secure 8 – 10 new manufacturer commitments. The RFP states the Contractor may work with

Draft Digital Brochure and Questionnaire (January 24, 2019); Meeting outcomes (Jan 24 – March 20, 2019); list of firm verbal commitments (March 28, 2019)

Page 6

Section 1 Summary

approximately 8 – 12 manufacturers. However, the budget for10 or more manufacturers to receive technical and testing services will reduce the interest of the manufacturer to participate based on lower budgeted service support compared to the hard cost, time, personnel, equipment and energy for the manufacturer to produce a feedstock conversion product.Our intent is to help the manufacturer realize that the FCS support services will reduce the manufacturer’s investment in producing a feedstock conversion product(s) of an average of $50,000 for 10 companies

2C. Prepare Draft Activity Plans

Work with assigned qualifiers fonewfeedrup to 20 committed manufacturing firms as approved by CalRecycle; document product data, support needs and crumb rubber use projections; develop a plan with specific goals, individual accountability and incentives for timeliness; identify potential road blocks and strategies.

Draft activity plans (May 1, 2019)

2D. Prepare Summary Report and Amend Contract

Compile activity plans and summary information in a single report; identify issues of concern/priority to CalRecycle; collaborate to identify optimal use of contract resources to maximize results.

Summary Report with prioritized list of prospective manufacturers and activities and projections; amended contract; May 1, 2019); Amended (May 15, 2019 or sooner)

2E. Qualify Processors

Work with CalRecycle and participating firms to identify minimum qualification criteria for crumb rubber producers based on ASTM test results; quality systems, operational practices and commitments to work towards FCS goals.

Qualifying criteria (draft April 21, 2019); Final May 7, 2019List of qualified processors and qualificationtest results (June 11, 2019)

2F.3. Work with Manufacturers to Implement Activity Plans

Project Manager and Assistant Project Manager (to be assigned to qualified manufacturers brought to FCS) to ensure firm and service providers achieve objectives in a timely manner; regular check-ins and trouble-shooting with all involved parties; identify and address issues as they arise.

Monthly status reports and periodic CalRecycle meetings(December 1, 2018 –April 15, 2021)

4. Crumb Rubber Material Testing

Work with CalRecycle to refine the need, schedule, sample collection procedures and other details for crumb rubber material testing. Efficiently gather samples and conduct tests based on ASTM standards and specifications identified for each product during the project.

Monthly status reports, with copies of test results submitted as confidential documents (December 2018 – January 2021)

5. Reporting Keep CalRecycle apprised of progress and issues as they arise; submit monthly progress and budget reports along with report copies; manage materials on share point site abiding by confidentiality policies; submit draft and final report, along with case studies, covering all project work.

Outline for Final Report and Case Studies (one month before contract ends – depends on start date by CalRecycle; estimate May 1, 2021) Final Report, Presentation Slides and Case Studies (Draft May 15, 2021 and Final July 1, 2021)

Page 7

2. METHODOLOGYTable 2 in Section 1 summarized our proposed timeline and methodology for completing contract tasks, and Table 1 identified approaches for overcoming several anticipated challenges. This section describes in more detail how the DK Enterprises Team will perform the work and collaborate with CalRecycle, participating businesses and others to maximize project benefits.

Task 1: Develop Project Work Plan

Objective: As soon as possible after contract approval, develop an approved work plan, schedule and budget for the FCS project.

Immediately upon receiving Notice to Proceed, the Project Team will be prepared to conduct a kickoff meeting to discuss the project and receive feedback on the work plan as described in this proposal. We will then submit a draft work plan based on this feedback within one week of the kickoff meeting and will revise the draft again within one week of receiving CalRecycle’s written comments. This will ensure that the team is authorized to begin task work at the earliest possible moment.

We would like to discuss and clarify the following points at the kickoff meeting, among others:

Specific roles and coordination steps among the contractor team, CalRecycle Staff and participating firms, especially coordination of FCS activities with the TIP;

Timing and sequencing of all task activities, including whether outreach to candidate manufacturers would be conducted in conjunction with future TIP cycles;

Expected challenges/barriers and approaches to overcoming them, and expectations for project outcomes.

In previous FCS we had success using dropbox to provide reports to CalRecycle’s FCS Project Manager versus SharePoint which user was not friendly.

We will seek written Work Plan approval prior to beginning work on any tasks. We anticipate updating the Work Plan as needed, including after the contract amendment step under Task 2D.

Task 1 Deliverables: Draft and final work plan; revisions as required during the contract period.

Page 8

Section 2 Methodology

Task 2: Identify Prospective Manufacturers, Conduct Marketing Outreach, Develop Individual Manufacturer Activity Plans and Budgets for Participating Manufacturers, and Qualify Processors to Provide Crumb Rubber

Task 2 will be led by Denise Kennedywith support by George Savage, CalRecovery and with technical assistance provided where needed by our team’s manufacturing specialist. CalRecovery has committed to bringing three qualified manufacturing candidates to FCS that will meet the FCS/TIP criteria.

2A. Prepare Prioritized List of Prospective Manufacturers

Objective: Develop a list of California qualified interested manufacturers, compounders and material specialist that can help to identify other qualified FCS manufacturing candidate.

Under the TOMA contract, our team in 2015,assembled a list of 147 California manufacturers that may be potential candidates for the TIP. We assembled the list using select categories of tire and virgin rubber and in some cases plastics manufacturers, as available on the free, Thomas Net online business directory. We also solicited ideas for candidate manufacturers from industry contacts and added select firms from previous TBAP marketing efforts. The best source for finding these contacts is through other compounders, material specialists, association membership of project manager and other service providers, testing lab contacts, through the Blue Book Building & Construction Network and the International elastomer conference which Denise Kennedy will be attending October 9 – 11, 2018. We will prioritize the companies known to be interested based on referrals or prior contacts, as well as the broad categories of rubber calendared products and compression molders.

We found that many contacts are typically needed before a firm can make a commitment. Firms require time to develop internal feedstock conversion goals, but also require a firm deadline to drive their actions, in this case, the TIP application deadline. We are usually given short notice as to the next TIP application or it is published at a time we are working on the California Waste Tire Market Report or the California Conference or the end of the FCS Contract. New TIP applicants are not always able to complete their applications with such short notice.

We will then add to this list of candidates in two ways: by again soliciting ideas from a range of industry representatives in diverse market niches and possibly buying new lists to secure additional firms if necessary to find candidate manufacturers.

We propose to prioritize the list initially based on potential interest based on referrals, apparent product categories based on information available (again with a focus on calendared and compression molders, and also companies similar to current feedstock conversion firms). However, we expect that information for confirming that firms meet TIP criteria and other priorities identified in the RFP (e.g., greater than $1 million in sales, stable or increasing demand, and with the potential to use 5 percent or more crumb rubber feedstock) is not likely to be readily available and will need to be gathered as we contact priority firms by phone under Task 2B.

The resulting list will be compiled in an Excel Spreadsheet, retaining information on lead sources, pertinent data and Project Team contacts made with each candidate firm. We will seek to identify a top priority candidate pool of approximately 50 firms to focus outreach on in Task 2B.

Page 9


Task 2A Deliverables: A spreadsheet listing contact information on all identified California rubber and plastics

manufacturers, along with gathered information, and identification of priorities.

2B. Conduct Outreach to Manufacturers and Secure Commitments

Objective: Identify firms meeting the RFP and TIP criteria who verbally (at this stage) commit to participate in the program and to pursue feedstock conversion objectives.

Based on guidance provided at the kickoff meeting and embodied in the approved Work Plan, the Project Manager and Project Assistant will most likely use the two-page digital announcement utilized in the previous FCS which summarized the program and its potential benefits to manufacturers, for use in email outreach to prospective candidates. The digital publication also provided information about the TIP program and criteria to qualify as a manufacturing candidate. Subject to discussion with CalRecycle, we envision the announcement will include potential benefits; information on the availability of crumb rubber; a short description of available funding and assistance from CalRecycle, and links to CalRecycle information and programs. And, while marketing support is not to be provided under the FCS contract, we envision leveraging the TOMA activities by offering to include feedstock conversion products (once commercially launched) in CalRecycle’s online TDP Catalog and outreach activities under TOMA.

The RFP describes solicitations to candidate firms being conducted in (look up TIP numbers) _, although we understand such activities may be desirable to hold until closer to the next TIP application cycle. In either case, as outlined in the RFP we have budgeted for one solicitation period under Task 2B that would include phone outreach.TIP solicitation requires crumb rubber testing and it is important to budget the number of visits to the FCS manufacturers locations, the TDM suppliers of the material sold to the manufacturers for FCS and TIP. It is also important to test the particle size of the material if we have interested candidates in FCS. Therefore, it is important to confirm the TIP schedule during the term of the FCS contract to budget for testing to support TIP.

And, under Task 2C the RFP suggests that the contractor may work with up to 20 manufacturers. Our experience has shown that there is a need for lengthy and repeated phone conversations with manufacturers before they are able to make a commitment to feedstock conversion, and that it is far more effective to work closely with a few strong candidates than to spend a small amount of time with many candidates. Taking these considerations into account, we have budgeted under Task 2B to focus outreach on 25 top candidates (based on available information), with the goal of identifying six additional feedstock conversion firms to receive services under the FCS program, bringing the total (when combined with assumed TIP grantees) to 20 manufacturers that we will work with under Task 2C to develop Activity Plans. We are open to discussing other approaches but given the strict budgeting limitations imposed on Tasks 1, 2 and 5, we feel that this approach will maximize our overall effectiveness.

Under task 2B, we will conduct outreach via phone, with the goal ofidentifying six firms that meet all eligibility criteria and who are able to make a verbal commitment (at this stage) to pursue feedstock conversion, and who are interested in receiving CalRecycle support. Subject to discussion with CalRecycle, we propose to hold off on in-person meetings until Task 2C, when we would meet in-person with the twenty firms to validate information discussed by phone and gather other information and

Page 10


suggestions needed to develop Activity Plans. This will reduce travel and consultant costs associated with in-person meetings and ensure that such costs are necessary and likely to yield results. We will track the outcomes of our phone conversations in a spreadsheet.

Task 2B Deliverables: Draft and final marketing materials in the form of a one or two-page digital

announcement for use in emailing to prospective candidates; A spreadsheet detailing the phone contacts made, level of interest by firms contacted,

and identifying which firms have made a verbal commitment, and details on their products and potential crumb use; and

A list of firms for whom we propose to develop action plans.

2C.Prepare Activity Plans

Objective: For up to six new select firms making a verbal commitment to pursue feedstock conversion that were identified in Task 2B, plus an assumed 14 TIP grantees, meet with them in-person and work with them to prepare a draft Activity Plan documenting measurable objectives, responsibilities and all details needed to guide timely completion.

The Project Team will first seek CalRecycle approval of the firms for whom we will develop Activity Plans. As discussed above under Task2B, our proposed budgetassumeswe will work with up to 20 manufacturers to develop an Activity Plan (one per firm), including as assumed 14 TIP grantees and six additional firms identified in Task 2B. We further assume for budgeting purposes that these 20 manufacturers will have a total of 25 – 50 products of which some companies may have multiple SKUs for one product covered under the FCS program.

Developing the Activity Plans is similar in some ways to the Business Assessments and Action Plans prepared under the TBAP program, which were led by the same individuals proposed to lead the Project Team in this FCS contract: DK Enterprises and CalRecovery, Inc. However, we propose a far more streamlined process to identify priority assistance and testing/certification needs. Developing Activity Plans requires close collaboration with both participating manufacturers, the TDM suppliers, and the service providers. Most importantly, however, is what does the manufacturer want and expect and who do they know they want to work with as a service provider from outside of their firm. We created a Questionnaire to help qualify the candidate manufacturer. We created an Activity Plan format that was utilized during the previous FCS. Both forms qualified the manufacturer from years in business to gross revenue to size of rubber if known, to service providers. We have provided a comprehensive list of service providers that will be beneficial but depending on the product and certification requirements, we may still need to add another lab or technical service provider.

We envision closing a written agreement with the manufacturer of the draft Activity Plan. We will then work with the firm as needed via telephone and email to finalize information gathered and draft the Activity Plan. As needed and as budget allows, we will tap our manufacturing technical assistance experts for feedback and advice as we develop the plans, including in some cases including them in conference calls with the firms. Section 5, Qualifications and Resources, details the expertise, services and types of tests or certifications we envision may be needed in the Activity Plans, and our response to the RFP Scenarios in Section 3 provides examples.

Page 11

Figure 1 – Proposed Activity Plan Outline

XYZ Company

Company InformationPrimary Contact (email, phone, fax)Manufacturer Facility InformationTire-Derived Material Supplier (if known)

Feedstock Conversion Services Team InformationFCS Project Manager (name, email and phoneFCS Service Provider Assigned Lead (name, email, phone)

Table 1: Product InformationProduct Name and Short Description and SKUProjected Sales and Rationale Product Weight, Crumb Rubber per Product and Mesh SizeProjected Sales and

Table 2: Product StrategyFor each product, list expected challenges and strategy for timely commercial launch

Table 3: Schedule of Milestones and Assistance ServicesFor each product, list Milestones; Target Date; Manufacturer Responsibilities; FCS Team Activities; and Consequences if Milestone not Met

Minimum Reporting RequirementsMonthly Progress Updates Advance Notice of Crumb Rubber Purchases (for Quality Check Purposes)Documentation of Quantities DeliveredDocumented Quarterly Sales Totals for Covered TDPs

Signed Approvals and Commitments


Subject to CalRecycle feedback, we envision one Activity Plan will be prepared for each participating manufacturer that incorporatesdetails related to all the firm’s feedstock conversion products covered in the FCS program. Specific milestones are likely to include:

1. Identifying the critical product characteristics and attributes that are essential to the manufacturer’s customer.

2. Developing an initial product formulation, manufacturing process and crumb rubber/compound specification for use in developing prototypes, and securing a source of the crumb rubber;

3. Developing a prototype suitable for testing (this may be a suitable hard deadline);

4. Conducting critical tests identified and approved for funding;

5. Refining the product formulation, manufacturing process and crumb rubber specifications, and/or revisiting earlier steps as needed.

6. Fully launching the product commercially. (Note – while included as a manufacturer milestone, FCS does not cover marketing and sales support, and budget is not available to support the launch phase.)

The Project Team will strive to develop reasonable and attainable estimates of crumb rubber use in the Activity Plans, and to ensure a reasonable relationship between expected outcomes and proposed assistance budgets. We will work in close consultation with both the manufacturers and CalRecycle to develop common expectations prior to submitting the summary report under Task 2D below. We propose that Activity Plan budgets not be shared with participating manufacturers to maximize CalRecycle’s flexibility to adjust in Activity Plans based on company progress during the project. Task budgets will be shared with CalRecycle in a separate master table as part of the summary report to be submitted under Task 2D.

To ensure that work proceeds in a timely manner, we propose that Activity Plans include one or two hard deadlines for critical manufacturer activities. If the hard deadlines are not met by the firm, CalRecycle would have the right to cancel the Activity Plan or reduce the level of services being provided.We would like to avoid situations where CalRecycle budget is committed to a firm that is not moving forward and making progress towards its goals, while conversely rewarding firms that do make

Page 12


progress and have the highest potential for success and high-volume crumb rubber use. Another concept for discussion would be to allocate only a portion of available budgets initially, and then allocating remaining budget at a certain point in time to those firms making the most progress and showing the highest potential for success. We believe such incentives could be structured in any number of ways and would like to work with CalRecycle Staff to identify the best approach that satisfies established contracting policies and requirements.

As described in Sections 4 and 5 below, our Project Team includes all the expertise and capabilities envisioned to meet the needs of participating manufacturers.

Task 2C Deliverables: Draft Activity Plans approved via email by each firm and ready for consideration by

CalRecycle

2D.Prepare Summary Report and Amend Contract

Objectives: Secure agreement with CalRecycle on Activity Plans, budgets and priorities to be implemented, amend the contract accordingly, and secure written, signed commitments from participating manufacturers

Once the complete set of draft activity plans is complete, the Project Teamwill prepare a summary report for consideration by CalRecycle that includes recommendations for prioritizing assistance and provides a high-level summary of proposed Activity Plans, budgets, companies, products and projected sales and crumb rubber use. As discussed above, and subject to approval by CalRecycle, we will also identify how incentives to stay on track can be built into the Activity Plans. We will then facilitate a meeting with CalRecycle Staff and managers to review the proposed plan and agree on any adjustments, issues and needs for additional information or revisions. We will then work with each firm to agree on edits to their Activity Plan to align them with CalRecycle approvals.

Our budget assumes that we will work with CalRecycle one time to formally amend our contract and work plan prior to initiating services under Tasks 3 and 4. Subject to discussion with CalRecycle, we will seek to structure the contract amendment in such a way as to provide flexibility to CalRecycle in adjusting allocated budgets by firm and/or waiting to allocate some budget until it becomes clear which firms are making the most progress and are most likely to show tangible results.

We propose to require that each participating firm’s authorized owner or manager sign their Activity Plan to pledge their commitment to adhere to the plan and to collaborate with the Technical Assistance team. DK Enterpriseswill offer to sign a confidentiality agreement with each firm and will require that all project team members with access to company information sign an acknowledgement of the confidentiality agreement. Also, DK Enterprises will include an indemnification clause for signature by participating manufacturers,providing risk protections for both the contractor team and CalRecycle.

Based on Activity Planneeds, and any other work plan adjustments identified, we will collaborate with the CalRecycle Project Manager todevelop a contract amendment to guide implementation of the Activity Plans and to make other contract/Work Plan adjustments deemed necessary. We will not begin to provide any services until the Summary Report is approved in writing by the CalRecycle Project

Page 13


Manager and the amendment to this agreement is finalized and approved by the Department of General Services.

While it is essential to minimize any changes to Activity Plans to complete them in a timely manner, it is also inevitable that some manufacturers will shift their plans in response to changing circumstances and/or lessons learned as their efforts and the technical assistance and testing under this contract proceeds. Consequently, we recommend that some mechanism for adjusting Activity Plans be built into the Activity Plan procedures and that the contract amendment be structured to allow a degree of flexibility in adjusting scope and budgets.

Task 2D Deliverables: Summary Report Proposed Method for Prioritizing Assistance and Recommendations Draft and Executed Contract Amendment

2E. Qualify Processors

Objective: Evaluate and qualifyCalifornia crumb rubber producers as suppliers under this contract who are willing to commit in writing to using California tires and who consistently satisfy minimum quality standards.

The Project Team will first develop proposed criteria for qualifying California crumb rubber producers as suppliers to manufacturers in the FCS Program. Preliminarily, we envision the criteria will include:

1. Willingness to sign a California Waste Tire Processor Letter modeled after a similar letter used in the TIP program. We will use Waste Tire Manifest System data to confirm the Tire-Derived Material (TDM) producer receives quantities of California tires consistent with stated production levels, including shipments from other processors. We believe the letters should also include an agreement to allow CalRecycle contractors to gather random samples and to prepare test reports for distribution to CalRecycle and the participating compounder and/or manufacturer.

2. Satisfying material “Quality Checks”. As described in the RFP, we have budgeted to conduct sieve analysis tests of the crumb rubber sizes that are identified to be utilized at the compounder and/or manufacturer on three separate occasions, with two samples to six samples depending on each size of material per visit, and have assumed a total of six crumb rubber producers are interested in being qualified under the TIP program (three in the North and three in the South). This equates to a total of 36 samples to be gathered on three separate dates from the six producers. Testing will be performed using ASTM D5644 and ASTM 5603 testing standards. As stated in the RFP, depending on the (working on budget so this will change) circumstances and business need, we may also analyze the crumb rubber surface morphology or perform other tests, however, our proposed budget does not include these additional tests under Task 2E. We will also obtain from each participating processor a crumb rubber Material Safety Data Sheet. In practice, especially for low mesh size crumb rubber that commands a lower price than finer mesh crumb rubber, we are concerned that some crumb rubber producers may choose not to participate due to perceived low demand by these manufacturers and an unwillingness to allow third parties to test their crumb rubber products, or because of a perception that meeting a detailed specification for some end-uses is not necessary.Please see Task 4 and Footnote number 7 under Attachment A(in Appendix A) for important notes regarding our proposed fixed price for crumb

Page 14


rubber testing and the need to cover travel and consultant time to gather the samples. To reduce ASTM crumb rubber testing costs and provide maximum value under this contract, we propose that DK Enterprises will conduct the sieve analysis tests directly based on owning the WS Tyler Ro-Tap machine. CalRecovery will be tasked to assist in the collection of the material and/or coordinating tests for outside labs for DK Enterprises in task 4. Add info about NSL Analytical looking up info

3. Quality systems. Each crumb producer must have systems in place to monitor and track crumb rubber characteristics and issues. In practice this means, minimally, that the producer has equipment available on-site to perform sieves analysis, and that testing is performed in a routine manner with appropriate record keeping.

4. Commitments to feedstock conversion. To qualify as a crumb rubber supplier under this program, we believe one of the main criterion should be a willingness to commit, verbally if not in writing, to collaborate with feedstock conversion manufacturers and the FCS contractor team in the future to establish and refine crumb rubber specifications, and to adjust their operations to meet those specifications.

Crumb rubber qualification results will be provided to CalRecycle in a one-two page report for each firm with attached testing reports.

In somecases, the TDM crumb rubber will be supplied to a compounder, who will be responsible for providing the final compound feedstock material to the manufacturer of the product s. While compounders will not be qualified under this contract, we propose to assist manufacturers by collaborating with compounders and qualified crumb rubber suppliers to meet their needs. Based on experience, we anticipate that this collaboration to define and satisfy feedstock needs will be a major component of the technical assistance activities to be covered under Activity Plans, which will be budgeted under Task 3 and 4 under the contract amendment to be prepared under Task 2D.

Task 2E Deliverables: Crumb Rubber Producer Qualifying Criteria (Draft and Final) Test Results and Brief Qualifying Reports for Crumb Rubber Producers

2F. Qualify Processors

Objective:

Still need to write objectives

Task 2F Deliverables: User Guide describing ASTM Standards D5603 (particle size) and ASTM D5644 (Test Method to

Determine the Particle size for Recycled Rubber. Instructional Video on how to perform test methods as per ASTM D5644 and description and

use of D5603.

Page 15


Task 3: Work with Manufacturers to Execute Individual Manufacturer Activity Plans

Objectives: Implement Activity Plans in a timely and efficient manner to achieve FCS program objectives.

Denise Kennedy will work with George Savage to address and delivering technical assistance services detailed in the Activity Plan. We will assign George Savage to work with the qualified manufacturers that he brings to FCS initially. CalRecovery will be responsible for tracking and reporting to the Project Manager, Denise Kennedy. Randy Russell will provide support in tracking and reporting progress in Activity Plan implementation. The full range of technical assistance and testing/certification services our team is prepared to offer is described under Section 5, Qualifications and Resources.

As described in the RFP, we will seek to coordinate the timely completion of activity plans and production of TDPs by the participating manufacturers. As covered in the Activity Plans approved under Task 2, we will assist in resolving production impediments or other concerns that hinder manufacturer timely production and sale of TDPs (while not providing assistance to manufacturers regarding marketing, web site design or actual product sales). To the extent approved in Activity Plans, we will seek to document product sales that verify feedstock conversion.

We have learned many valuable lessons in our previous feedstock conversion and technical assistance work under TBAP and elsewhere. We know that manufacturers have multiple competing priorities and that there are many barriers to evaluating and implementing changes in production processes that directly impact production, marketing and sales, financial performance and other company areas. Consequently, we believe the keys to success to Task 3 and overall FCS Program success include:

Developing and maintaining a high level of trust among the Project Team, Manufacturer and CalRecycle;

Providing valuable, high quality technical assistance, testing and certification services that will provide tangible benefits to participating manufacturers;

Continual, regular communication with participating manufacturers (including operational, marketing and management representatives), along with assigned service providers and involved supply chain firms;

Regular monitoring, direct feedback and reminders of upcoming milestones and deadlines, especially the proposed “hard deadlines” for manufacturer milestones needed to continue ongoing assistance services, as well as the need to assure use of California tire rubber only; and

Respectful, sustained tenacity and enthusiastic support to keep key players motivated and on-track for success.

In the FCS Program, we will build on these experiences and lessons learned to maximize program benefits. We will keep CalRecycle’sProject Manager apprised through submission of monthly progress reports with copies of test results documenting progress, next steps and identifying any issues or

Page 16


concerns that could impede success.Project management costs associated with executing subcontract agreements and tracking and coordinating subcontractor activities related to implementing Activity Plans, including provision of technical assistance services and product testing/certification as approved in Activity Plans, will be covered under Task 3.

We would like to discuss expectations for timing and outcomes under the FCS contract time and resource constraints during the Task 1 kickoff meeting.

Task 3 Deliverables: Monthly progress reports and a final report (to be provided under Task 5)

Task 4: Crumb Rubber Material Testing

Objectives: Provide efficient and timely crumb rubber material testing services to support implementation of Activity Plans and to support the Tire Incentive Program.

Under Task 4, subject to the budget constraints included in the contract amendment to be developed under Task 2, the Project Team will conduct tests of crumb rubber materials supplied to manufacturers participating in the FCSProgram as well as those approved through the TIP grant program. Denise Kennedy will serve as lead coordinator for crumb rubber material testing and DK Enterprises will perform the particle size tests and reporting utilizing the WS Tyler Ro-Tap Machine. Periodically we will send out the material for testing through a digitalcamsizer to compare tests and the laserdiffraction tests performed by NSL Analytical.

Our proposed approach described here and in the Appendix A Cost Proposal is intended to fully respond to the RFP requirements as written. However, we believe the quantity and type of crumb rubber testing that will be needed may be over-stated in the RFP. We would like to discuss with CalRecycle as part of Task 1 Work Plan development, and again under Task 2D contract amendment development and budgeting for Tasks3 and 4, how CalRecycle resources can best be applied to maximize value and to provide the information most needed to achieve FCS Program goals. Following are some of the issues we would like to discuss and clarify.

Each crumb rubber sample will be tested for particle size distribution according to the sieve testing procedures detailed under ASTM D5644, and ASTM 5603, as appropriate. For the purposes of budgeting under this proposal, we assume that only particle size distribution is needed. Our Cost Proposal in Appendix A lists a proposed fixed price cost for particle distribution tests only based on ASTM D5644 and ASTM 5603. Please see Footnote number 7 under Attachment A (in Appendix A) for important notes regarding our proposed fixed price for crumb rubber testing and the need to cover travel and consultant time to gather the samples. To reduce ASTM crumb rubber testing costs and provide maximum value under this contract, we propose that Denise Kennedy DK Enterprises will conduct the sieve analysis tests directly. If the need arises, accredited testing laboratories are available on our team for more refined test needs.

We assume crumb rubber specifications for each manufacturer and product will be identified through Activity Plans for FCS participants, and by TIP program manufacturers. Project management costs associated with executing subcontract agreements and tracking and coordinating subcontractor activities related to crumb rubber material testing will be covered under Task 4.

Page 17


Task 4 Deliverables: Copies of Test Results and Summaries of Site Visits and Issues Identified (to be provided

with monthly progress reports)

Task 5: Reporting

Objectives: Keep CalRecycle apprised of Work Plan and budget and progress status, and any issues that arise throughout the contract, and submit a thorough final report documenting outcomes.

The Project Team will stay in regular contact with the CalRecycleProject Manager, generally Denise Kennedy. DK Enterprises will submit monthly progress and budget reports along with invoices during the project. We will structure these progress reports as concise tables, but due to the anticipated large number of tasks and sub-tasks, the tables are likely to flow over several pages.

As required in the RFP, monthly reports will include, for each task and sub-task (broken down by manufacturer and product):

Total budget, previously billed amount, current month billing and amount remaining;

Summary of activity completed, anticipated next steps and significant issues or potential impediments and proposed resolution; and

Copies of completed tests, certifications and digital photographs (before and after) of completed products.

All confidential and proprietary information will be labeled clearly and appropriately so that it is considered a “trade secret” consistent with Public Resources Code 40062. We propose to identify with CalRecycle what items will be considered confidential during Task 1 Work Plan development. We assume that, minimally, product test reports and results will be considered confidential.We propose to identify appropriate procedures for managing confidential documents during Task 1 Work Plan development. Under Task 5 we will develop the templates to be used for tracking tasks, invoices, budgets and for executing sub-contracts and task orders. Sub-contracting and task assignments for Activity Plan implementation will be covered under Task 3.

Also, as required in the RFP, DK Enterprises will submit a draft Final Report by February 1, 2018, and revised Final Report incorporating any CalRecycle comments by March 1, 2018. The Final Report will include:

A summary of contract activity, including summaries by manufacturer and product;

The aggregated anticipated usage of crumb rubber and projected annual sales of all products;

Key challenges and how they were overcome;

Suggestions for future assistance activity;

Page 18


The ability to replicate for other similar products; and

Four one-page successful case studies.

If requested, we will also present a summary of the Final Report in person, at a regular CalRecycle Monthly Meeting or another venue as directed by CalRecycle. All reports and documents drafted for publication will be prepared in accordance with CalRecycle’s Publications Guide, and DK Enterprises will work with CalRecycle’s editor to finalize the documents. We will provide a draft report outline for the final report and case studies by December 2017 for feedback, and to help ensure that the final report meets expectations and that we minimize the need for revisions.

We propose to identify exactly which documents and reports will be published by CalRecycle during Task 1 Work Plan development. Preliminarily, we assume that only the contract Final Report and Case Studies will be published. While other documents not identified as confidential and proprietary may technically be “public,” we tentatively assume that they will not be published and would only be made available publicly through a specific request.

Deliverables: Monthly Progress Reports and Copies of Work Products (Monthly) Final Contract Report (Draft and Final) Four Successful Case Studies (Draft and Final) Presentation Slides and Delivery of Presentation

Page 19

3. SCENARIOSGeneral Approach to All Scenarios

For efficiency we describe our general approach to scenarios first. We then we describe the specific responses for each of the three scenarios. We believe that the scenarios presented in the RFP are more expansive than will be encountered in practice, and without more details it is impossible to provide a specific approach. However, we have sought to describe how we would approach the hypothetical scenarios and to identify plausible work plans and budgets consistent with them, within the context of overall RFP and proposal requirements, including budget requirements.

Following are general approaches that we would use for all three scenarios.

Identifying Potential Crumb Rubber Usage:A manufacturer’s potential crumb rubber usage is calculated separately based on the total weight of each product; the percentage of each raw material and its weight that would be replaced by crumb rubber; the total number of pounds of crumb rubber per product; the projected number of products to be sold annually; and the total projected use of crumb rubber pounds of crumb rubber per year. We will seek to develop projections for year two (i.e., after FCS assistance is complete) and for year 5 (i.e., after the firm has had time to adjust operations and marketing activities). In our experience, extensive discussions and review of documents is needed to develop these estimates with some confidence. And, sales projections are notoriously inaccurate, meaning that all projections will be estimates. However, we intend to be conservative in our assumptions and to ensure that projections are realistic, attainable goals given all information available to the team. The assumptions used to estimate potential crumb rubber usage are likely to change during Activity Plan implementation, and will be updated at the end of the contract for use in the final report.

Defining Crumb Rubber Mesh Size: Detailed specifications for crumb rubber needs will ideally define the mesh size, including the particle distribution (i.e., the amount of crumb rubber above and below certain defined threshold sizes that is allowable). In some cases the specification may also refer to the morphology (i.e., structure and shape) of the granules, whether it is produced using a cryogenic or ambient process, the percentage of natural rubber and/or the percentage of other contaminants allowable, such as wire or fiber. In practice, the specific specification will be developed through iterative discussions with the customer (if requested), manufacturer and tire-derived material (TDM) supplier. First, the FCS Activity Plan Manager will work with each manufacturer, in consultation with team specialists to identify the type of crumb rubber most likely to succeed; communicate with the TDM suppliers and possibly request shipment of various sizes of crumb rubber to the manufacturer for on-site testing. (We tentatively assume that the cost of the crumb rubber and cost of shipment is not eligible for reimbursement under the program and will be the responsibility of the TDM supplier or manufacturer.) The mesh size will vary depending on the manufactured product and its specification and customer requirements. The manufacturer may require different crumb rubber mesh sizes to experiment in producing numerous samples to determine what crumb rubber material will work in the prototype. Once the manufacturer determines that the sample(s) appear to be successful, further testing may be required. For independent testing verification, a process that in some cases can be expected to take weeks or even months due to the type of test, possible construction schedule time; lab test available time. . After the sample performance is documented, the specification of crumb rubber

Page 20

Section 3 Scenarios

can be finalized. In practice, we believe the process will this will occur towards the end of the FCS assistance process for most firms.

Identify Technical Assistance, Testing and Certification Needs and Costs and Prioritize the 14 Products:The specific assistance, testing and certification priorities will vary widely by manufacturer and product. In general we envision that each product’s Activity Plan will include the following milestones, with assistance activities as indicated below:

1. Identify and secure a preliminary crumb rubber specification for use in developing prototypes. The team will assist in suggesting preliminary mesh sizes and considerations, and will facilitate communication between the manufacturer and alternative crumb rubber suppliers.

2. Developing a sample/prototype suitable for testing. This will primarily be the manufacturer’s responsibility, although the team’s specialists will be available to provide feedback and advice. Some of the key considerations related to producing prototypes and refining manufacturing processes include:

The potential need to isolate existing production from prototype production in time due to odor concerns related to crumb rubber and/or to leaving black material in equipment used for lighter color products;

Refining the exact mix of crumb sizes and other additives; Determining an appropriate strategy for colorizing the product and determining feasible

colors that can be produced; and Adjusting extrusion and compression equipment and molds to optimize results.

If needed, we also have the capacity to arrange for the production of prototypes independently, although we assume most manufacturers will insist on doing this themselves. We would like to discuss making this step a hard deadline within the Activity Plans. That is, manufacturers would be required to produce a sample / prototype by a certain date, or to demonstrate efforts to do so; otherwise CalRecycle would have the prerogative of reducing or canceling further assistance services. This may aid in driving timely progress in some cases.

3. Conduct independent testing and certifications.Tests are identified based on market and regulatory need and conducted by team resources, under direction of the Activity Plan Manager.

4. Refining and finalizing the crumb rubber specification to be used. The team will assist in finalizing a crumb rubber specification for use after the prototype and formulation is finalized. We will coordinate with crumb rubber producers to ensure the capacity to meet the required specification using California waste tires at qualified crumb rubber production facilities.

5. Communicating regularly with the manufacturer and gathering information needed for monthly progress reports. We anticipate that this will be a key role played by the Activity Manager assigned to each manufacturer (e.g., either Denise Kennedy or George Savage). Our role will be to provide regular, ongoing encouragement and support, including reminders of established timelines and individual responsibilities, to manufacturer and assistance/testing team leads. We will make every effort to drive Activity Plans forward by whatever means necessary. Progress and success, however, will depend most on each manufacturer’s sustained commitment; in our experience, in virtually all cases, manufacturers will experience setbacks and distractions that may complicate, slow or change original plans. We will work hard to minimize such setbacks and to keep CalRecycle up to date on the status of Activity Plans and any issues as they arise.

Page 21

Section 3 Scenarios

6. Gathering information for the final report. We will explicitly include in Activity Plans the expectations for participating firms to provide information on crumb rubber use and product sales to CalRecycle. Participating firms will be asked to sign the Activity Plan to document their commitment.

How Implement Activity Plan and Time Line:As described above under #4, we view the key to Activity Plan implementation as sustained, tenacious and enthusiastic communication with all parties involved – including manufacturer staff, assistance team service/testing providers and CalRecycle Staff. We will strive to establish reasonable, achievable timeframes that are acceptable to CalRecycle. We expect that over the course of the approximately 18 month timeframe for assistance/testing activities, a reasonable goal in most cases will be to complete prototypes that meet performance and other requirements, and define the final crumb rubber specification. This will allow the manufacturers to begin production towards the end of the FCS project period. Where possible, we will strive to establish faster schedules that achieve commercial production and ongoing crumb rubber use as soon as possible.

DK Enterprises’ proposal assumes that manufacturers will be responsible for covering the cost of shipping samples/prototypes to testing labs. Also, DK Enterprises will not be responsible for the costs associated with re-testing products due to unsatisfactory test results.

Describe Three Benefits to Assist Manufacturers in their decision to use crumb rubber:In our experience, there are three broad drivers or benefits related to crumb rubber feedstock conversion. All are intimately tied to perceived value by the licensed owner of the product and its customer, the designated manufacturer which may be the licensed owner and the interest of crumb rubber suppliers to meet the needs of the owner of the product’s customer. . First, using crumb rubber may enhance certain performance attributes, including durability, softness, flexibility, acoustical properties and others. Second, using recycled materials in placed of other raw materials may provide cost advantages based on the current cost of the other raw materials, leading to increased profitability. And third, using recycled feedstock may provide marketing advantages in certain situations where “green” products are desired. Using recycled feedstock reduces waste and also can reduce overall use of natural resources, energy and emissions, including greenhouse gas emissions. Finally, and closely associated with green marketing, using recycled tire rubber feedstock can be driven by decisions by the manufacturer or their customers to integrate sustainability into their business practices.

Scenario A

Scenario A RFP Description:Whole Products is a 15 year old profitable company with annual sales of $10 million. The company produces and sells rubber building products. The company is interested in reducing its cost of goods sold to be more price competitive in the marketplace. The company would also like to be more “green.” However, the company is concerned that using recycled material might reduce the product performance and damage its reputation. The company has 13 products (10 are flooring or underlayment of varying thicknesses and 3 are baseboards) which may be able to use 7% - 100% of 10 – 30 mesh crumb rubber, depending on the product.

Describe how you would: identify the potential crumb rubber usage and appropriate mesh size; identify the appropriate technical assistance (product sample production, applicable [ASTM and/or alternative] testing and certifications) and corresponding budget; and prioritize the 13 products. Provide an activity plan and budget for the top 8 products for Whole Products. Describe how you would implement the

Page 22

Section 3 Scenarios

activity plan and provide an appropriate timeline. Identify 3 benefits that can be communicated to Whole Products to assist in their decision to use crumb rubber.

Most of the requested information is covered above under General Approach to Scenarios. For Whole Products’ underlayment and baseboard, the size of mesh may range from 10-30 to 50 mesh depending on the two products and the specification requirements of the manufacturer’s customer. We expect to use 50 mesh or finer for the baseboard which are currently made of virgin rubber. We anticipate replacing 10 percent of the virgin rubber with recycled 50 mesh tire rubber. This recommendation would provide a substantial savings by reducing the higher cost of virgin rubber at this time. The flooring underlayments would likely require 10- 30 mesh rubber again depending on the specification of the manufacturer’s customer. The benefits of using recycled tire rubber as a feedstock conversion material for this product will provide longer wearability and durability, plus the reformulated product may be considered an anti-fatigue underlayment, providing the customer with additional marketing benefits.

The first step is to meet with the manufacturer to better understand the use and make recommendations for the size of mesh and rather the material should be ambient or cryogenic based on experience working with companies that manufacture new and existing products. We would request crumb rubber of multiple mesh sizes be shipped to the manufacturer to determine which material works best in its sample tests. Once the selection of the correct requirements are established and the manufacturer is satisfied with its sample, we would implement the agreed upon tests that would be beneficial to the manufacturer and within budget and timeline of scope of project.

Specific appropriate product tests and certifications for the flooring underlayment to be considered would include:

VOC Emissions Report (produced according to California Department of Health’s standard method);

Environmental Chamber Test for flooring, if required by manufacturer’s customer (TVOC, HCHO); PEP212A

o Emission factors of volatile organic compounds at 24 elapsed hourso Emission factors of selected aldehydes

Determine if manufacturer holds or requires assistance in obtaining Green Guard certification;

ASTM E492, Laboratory Measurement of Impact Sound Transmission through Floor-Ceiling Assemblies;

ASTM E2179, Effectiveness of Floor Coverings in Reducing Impact Sound Transmission through Concrete Floors;

ASTM E90, Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Partitions and Elements; Without knowing application and location of baseboards or customer requirements,

identifying test methods is difficult. Testing may include ASTM F2797 which is the method for evaluating edge cleaning effectiveness of vacuum cleaners; and

ICC Code Building Standards.

The appropriate product tests to consider, if budget were available, would be: ASTM D412 – Elongation ASTM D638 – Tensile Strength ASTM D522 - Flexibility

Page 23

Section 3 Scenarios

We assume the top priority tests are determined to be ASTM tests E492, E2197 and E90, which can be completed for approximately $2,900. We assume that overall priorities and assistance needs, and budgeting assumptions under this RFP for these scenarios, allow up to $19,000 to be allocated for priority testing, and that the firm will choose to 6 sets of the above packaged tests for top priority products.

Activity plans prepared during the project will be based on the outline provided in Figure 1 under Task 2C, on page 8. The heart of each Activity Plan will be embodied in three tables: A description of products to be supported by CalRecycle’s FCS Program (including details on product weight, crumb rubber percentages and mesh size, and projected sales and crumb rubber use); Information on anticipated challenges for each product and strategies for timely launch; and a schedule of manufacturer milestones (including consequences for not meeting milestones) and FCS assistance services. For brevity in this proposal, and because of the high-level nature of these scenarios that do not include many details, we present a simplified sample Activity Plan Summary Table here that seems plausible based on the information provided for Scenario A. We have combined all products into this sample plan at a high level. During the project, we envision separating out plans for different types of products.

Table 3: Simplified Sample Activity Plan Summary for Whole Products, Scenario A

Activity Milestone,Target Completion Date and Responsible Party*

Assumed Start Date December 1, 20151. Identify preliminary crumb rubber specification and secure material for producing samples and readying them for further testing at the manufacturer.

1a. Identify preliminary crumb rubber specification. By Jan. 1, 2016 (Denise Kennedy with Manufacturer Representative; consultation with appropriate technical representative/testing facility if required by manufacturer)

1b. Secure crumb rubber material for manufacturer to produce and test samples. By Jan. 15, 2016. (Denise Kennedy to provide introductions and facilitate initial phone meetings with potential suppliers and manufacturer representative.)

1c. Initial crumb rubber supplies received. By Jan. 21, 2016 (Manufacturer representative works with supplier)

2. Develop sample of prototype product

2a. Identify manufacturing process concerns and strategies. By Feb. 7, 2016 (Denise Kennedy facilitates phone consultation with technical representative/testing facility and manufacturer)

2b. Iterative experimentation of sample and/or prototype production and alternative crumb rubber/compound specifications. Feb. – June, 2016 (Manufacturer rep. with assistance/feedback from Denise Kennedy and/or team specialists)

2c. Complete initial sample material / prototype ready for independent testing By June 15, 2016 (manufacturer rep.)

3. Conduct independent testing and certifications.

3a. Finalize required tests and as possible schedule lab availability. By May 1, 2016 (Denise Kennedy in consultation with manufacturer rep and specialists as needed.)

3b. Denise Kennedy will schedule the dates for testing based on commitment by the manufacturer to ship the samples to the lab by June 15, 2016. Complete tests agreed to be covered under FCS – assumed to be six sets of ASTM tests E492, E2197 and E90 for priority products (limited due to budget considerations). Denise Kennedy will also coordinate review and finalization of test results with the lab and the manufacturer. By Sep. 15, 2016 (Lab TBD, facilitation by Denise Kennedy)

4. Refine and finalize crumb rubber specification and suppliers

4a. Prepare specification. By Oct. 1, 2016 (Denise Kennedy in consultation with manufacturer rep., crumb rubber producer and technical advisor/testing facility)

Page 24

Section 3 Scenarios


5. Monthly check-ins and final report; project crumb rubber use

5a. Monthly check in calls (short discussions between Denise Kennedy and manufacturer rep.)

5b. Final check in – February 2016 (Manufacturer rep. provides projections and summary of status/outcomes to Denise Kennedy.)

Assistance Activity Ends November 30, 2017Total Budget*Proposed budgets for Scenario A are shown in Attachment B.1 within Appendix A. We propose that budgets for FCS assistance services not be shared with participating manufacturers in order to keep them focused on milestones and assistance outcomes offered, and to reduce negotiations that could reduce CalRecycle’s flexibility in allocating budget in a way that maximizes benefits across the program. We propose to share assistance task budgets with CalRecycle as part of the overall Summary Report and contract amendment process under Task 2D.

Scenario B

Scenario B RFP Description: Custom Production is a 35 year old profitable company with sales of $40 million per year. The company produces a variety of thermoplastic elastomer products for it to sell as well as on a contract basis for other companies to sell. The company has written authorization from 6 companies to use an appropriate amount of crumb rubber in a total of 14 products which are currently produced with virgin material. The products may be able to substitute 7% - 20% of the rubber portion with crumb rubber of 50 mesh or finer, depending on the product and performance specifications. Because of the nature of the production process, a higher natural rubber content crumb rubber may be preferred. It is essential that performance of the products using crumb rubber be equal or better than those using virgin materials.

Describe how you would: identify the potential crumb rubber usage, appropriate mesh size and original source of the rubber; identify the appropriate technical assistance (product sample production, applicable [ASTM and/or alternative] testing and certifications) and corresponding budget; and prioritize the 14 products. Provide an activity plan and budget for the top 10 products for Custom Production. Describe how you would implement the activity plan and provide an appropriate timeline. What are other important considerations with thermoplastic elastomers? Identify 3 benefits that can be communicated to Custom Production to assist in their decision to use crumb rubber.

Again, most of the requested information is covered above under General Approach to Scenarios. There is no information provided on the nature of the products, other than they are currently made with thermoplastic elastomers. Therefore, we assume the products are injection molded and that crumb rubber will first be prepared with polymers and other additives by a compounder either within their company or externally. We will involve early in the process our rubber-plastic compounding specialist Richard Warpack of Modern Concepts, Inc. Some considerations for using crumb rubber with thermoplastic elastomers include:

As with all feedstock conversion, customer needs and required product performance characteristics must drive the process. This is especially true for injection molded products using rubber-plastic compounds because the rubber may potentially impact performance in a variety of ways;

Page 25

Section 3 Scenarios

The Rubber will be used as a filler, and therefore the most ideal products are those with relatively forgiving characteristics (e.g., as opposed to highly engineered products that must be very high specifications, for example, for tensile strength);

The products ideally can be produced in a black or dark color, or can have an exterior material used for coloration;

Finer mesh crumb would be expected to perform best, in part because more coarse material may result in surface imperfections and reduce overall product strength; and

Relatively thick-profile products are best candidates as they can incorporate more filler material within the matrix of the product.

Appropriate product tests and certifications to be considered cannot be identified without knowing the nature of the products. Table 9 in Section 5 lists a sampling of several dozen product tests. As described above, we would work with the manufacturer and team specialists as needed to identify testing needs and priorities. We would prioritize products and testing/assistance needs based on customer requirements and the manufacturer’s own resources outside of the FCS Program.


Table 4: Simplified Sample Activity Plan Summary for Whole Products, Scenario B


Assumed Start Date December 1, 20151. Identify preliminary crumb rubber specification and secure material for testing

1a. Identify preliminary crumb rubber specification. By Jan. 1, 2016 (Denise Kennedy with Manufacturer Representative; consultation with Richard Warpack, Modern Concepts)

1b. Secure crumb rubber material for testing. By Jan. 15, 2016 (Denise Kennedy to provide introductions and facilitate initial phone meetings with potential suppliers and manufacturer representative.)


2. Develop sample / prototype

2a. Identify manufacturing process concerns and strategies. By Feb. 7, 2016 (Denise Kennedy facilitates phone consultation with Richard Warpack of Modern Concepts and manufacturer rep.)

2b. Iterative experimentation of prototype production and alternative crumb rubber/compound specifications. Feb. – June, 2016 (Manufacturer rep. with assistance/feedback from Denise Kennedy and/or team specialists)

Page 26

Section 3 Scenarios


2c. Complete initial prototype ready for independent testing By June 15, 2016 (manufacturer rep.)


3a. Finalize required tests and as possible schedule lab availability. By March 1, 2016 (Denise Kennedy in consultation with manufacturer rep and specialists as needed.)

3b. Complete tests agreed to be covered under FCS –the specific tests would be determined based on the product and customer needs. We assume priority tests related to the top 10 products will be conducted, see Attachment B.2. By Sep. 15, 2016 (Lab TBD, facilitation by Denise Kennedy)


4a. Prepare specification. By Oct. 1, 2016 (Denise Kennedy in consultation with manufacturer rep., crumb rubber producer and Richard Warpack, Modern Concepts)

5. Monthly and final check-ins; project crumb rubber use

5a. Monthly check in calls (short discussions between Denise Kennedy and manufacturer rep.)

5b. Final check in – November 30, 2017 (Manufacturer rep. provides projections and summary of status/outcomes to Denise Kennedy.)


Scenario C

Scenario C RFP Description: Superior Roofing is a 55 year old company with sales of $75 million per year that produces a variety of asphalt roofing and coating products. The company is interested in reducing its cost of goods sold and being more “green.” It may be able to use 5% - 15% of 30 mesh and/or finer crumb rubber in 12 products. Many of its products have a 25 or 50 year, of “lifetime” performance guarantee. It is essential that product performance (especially longevity) be equal or better than those not using crumb rubber.

Describe how you would: identify the potential crumb rubber usage, appropriate mesh size and original source of the rubber; identify the appropriate technical assistance (product sample production, applicable [ASTM and/or alternative] testing and certifications) and corresponding budget; and prioritize the 12 products. Provide an activity plan and budget for the top 9 products for Custom Productions. Describe how you would implement the activity plan and provide an appropriate timeline. What are other important considerations and unique aspects of using crumb rubber in an asphalt roofing or coating product? Identify 3 benefits that can be communicated to Superior Roofing to assist in their decision to use crumb rubber.

Depending on the requirement of the manufacturer’s customer and application, and the critical to quality material requirements, we would begin by experimenting with 30 to 50 mesh per ASTM standards D5644 and D5603.

Some unique considerations related to using crumb rubber in roofing and coating products include: Whether the product is intended for new or repair roofs;

Page 27

Section 3 Scenarios

What materials and performance standards is the manufacturer’s competition obtaining?

Is the product mixed with other materials, such as glass, plastic, bonding materials or others?

Is adhesion required, and to what standard? Odor may be a challenge in some applications and processes.

We will communicate to Superior Roofing that we have assisted other roofing companies who have seen real benefits in terms of reduced costs and enhanced product performance, including greater longevity, durability, enhanced flexibility, metal adhesion and ease of installation.

Based on our experience, we believe for asphaltic roofing products the following two ASTM tests would be a requirement, in addition to others:

ASTM D6164, Physical Properties Specification for SBS Membranes with Polyester and Glass/Fiber; and

ASTM D6162, Physical Properties Specifications for SBS Membranes Polyester

For coatings, we believe these would be among priority tests to consider: ASTM D968, Abrasion Resistance Test; ASTM C1028, Coefficient of Friction; and ASTM C297/C297M, Adhesion Test.

As detailed in our cost proposal, the two roofing tests will cost approximately $3,900 each, while the coating costs are in the $1,000 range. Because resources within these three scenarios are limited, we have allocated $15 – 20,000 for testing, and assume that the firm would focus on roofing, and conduct six tests covering ASTM D6164 and ASTM D6162 top priority products.


Page 28

Section 3 Scenarios

Table 5: Simplified Sample Activity Plan Summary for Whole Products, Scenario C


Assumed Start Date December 1, 20151. Identify preliminary crumb rubber specification and secure material for testing

1a. Identify preliminary crumb rubber specification. By Jan. 1, 2016 (Ed Boisson with Manufacturer Representative; consultation with an appropriate manufacturer technical assistance or testing services specialist TBD)

1b. Secure crumb rubber material for testing. By Jan. 15, 2016. (Ed Boisson to provide introductions and facilitate initial phone meetings with potential suppliers and manufacturer representative.)


2. Develop prototype product 2a. Iterative experimentation of prototype production and alternative crumb rubber/compound specifications. Feb. – June, 2016 (Manufacturer rep. with assistance/feedback from Denise Kennedy, Ed Boisson and/or team specialists)

2c. Complete initial prototype ready for independent testing By June 15, 2016 (manufacturer rep.)


3a. Finalize required tests and as possible schedule lab availability. By March 1, 2016 (Ed Boisson/Denise Kennedy in consultation with manufacturer rep and specialists as needed.)

3b. Complete tests agreed to be covered under FCS for top nine products. Assume six ASTM D6162 and ASTM D6164 tests for top priority products...By Sep. 15, 2016 (Lab TBD, facilitation by Denise Kennedy/Ed Boisson)


4a. Prepare specification. By Oct. 1, 2016 (Ed Boisson in consultation with manufacturer rep., crumb rubber producer and appropriate manufacturer technical assistance specialist TBD)

5. Monthly and final check-ins; project crumb rubber use

5a. Monthly check in calls (short discussions between, Technical Assistance Managers and and manufacturer rep for updating and reporting)5b. Final check in – November 30, 2017 (Manufacturer rep. provides projections and summary of status/outcomes to Ed Boisson.)


Page 29

4. ORGANIZATIONThis section briefly describes DK Enterprises (prime contractor) and its subcontractor organizations to bring success to the FCS agreement. In brief, the contractor team organizations have the resources, specialized experience and knowledge, and established industry relationships to effectively work with CalRecycle to deliver strong results. CalRecycle, Inc. (CRI), is joining the FCS Team. CRI is a highly recognized expert in waste management solutions and has managed several projects that involved the use of waste tires as a feedstock for purposes of materials recovery and material testing. The Wilson Group has accepted the responsibility to participate as a team member in FCS as the California Certified Small Business (SB) & Disabled Veterans Business Enterprises (DVBE). Four other FCS team members are identified as California Certified Small Businesses. A more detailed description of our team’s resources and qualifications, and how we will work together during the contract is provided below under Section 5, Qualifications and Resources. We are not aware of any conflicts of interest for any of the firms and individuals included in this proposal.

DK Enterprises

Denise Kennedy, founder and president of DK Enterprises, brings over 30 years of expertise in scrap tire recycling and recycling business development. Since 2006, DK Enterprises has served as the most highly demanded technical assistance and marketing resource under CalRecycle’s Tire-Derived Business Assistance Program (TBAP), Tire Outreach Market and Analysis (TOMA and TOMA2), and contractor for the first CalRecycle Feedstock Conversion Technical Assistance and Material Testing Services (FCS). Ms. Kennedy has also been tasked to help find companies to participate in the Tire Incentive Program (TIP).

DK Enterprises has specialized in new product development since 2007 with a focus on introducing the tire-derived material (TDM) feedstock suppliers to potential tire-derived product manufactures and the manufacturers to testing facilities and compounders. Through this process Ms. Kennedy has been passionate about leading projects to define and meet best management practices in the development of new TDP’s. Ms. Kennedy is a valued liaison to the tire recycling and tire-derived products industry and is a sought-after speaker for national and international conferences. To support recycling of materials and development of products and end uses, Denise Kennedy, principal, participates in various ASTM International committees including: D11 (Rubber), D11.20.01 (Recycled Rubber, Section Chair), D36 (Recovered Carbon Black, D36.40 Environmental, Safety & Subcommittee Chair), D24 (Carbon Black), D04 (Road and Paving Materials), F08 (Sports Equipment, Playing Surfaces, and Facilities) and F15 (Consumer Products).

DK Enterprises has built a solid reputation for delivering value added solutions to her clients, which include manufacturers, processors, distributors and their supply chains. Denise Kennedy communicates a sustainable networking approach through business relationships and creative alliances; recycling through solid partnerships. This innovative approach sets DK Enterprises apart from the competition by building long-term partnerships based on integrity, shared goals, and proven financial success. DK Enterprises, created to provide environmental and economically sound sustainable solutions to people in the private and public sector, is helping to shape our environment and communicate social responsibility. Innovation, creativity, knowledge and sound realistic business practices are all part of the

Page 30

Section 4 Organization

solution to save the environment. DK Enterprises’ subsidiary DKE Publishing provides a unique turning pages electronic publishing technology that opens new market opportunities. DK Enterprises has been tasked through CalRecycle TBAP, TOMA and TOMA2 programs to produce the California Tire-Derived Product Catalog.

Akron Polymer Technology Services (APTS)

APTSTestingDivisionisacontractservicesfacilityoperatedbyTheUniversityofAkron’sCollegeofPolymerScienceandPolymerEngineering. They havebeenservingtheindustrialcommunity,especiallyrubberandplastics,forover50years. Withafull-timeprofessionalstaff,andahalf-million-dollarinventoryofmoderninstrumentation,theDivisionisdedicatedtoperforming sophisticatedandtimelycontractualtechnicalservicesforindustrialandgovernmentclients.InadditiontodedicatedresourcesmaintainedbytheDivision,thelaboratoryhasaccesstohighlysophisticatedinstrumentationthroughtheCollegeofPolymerScienceandPolymerEngineeringandwillinterfacewithastaffofover30highlyspecializedfacultytosolvemorecomplexpolymerrelatedproblems.

The APTSProcessingDivisionprovidespolymercompounding,blending,processingandphysicaltestingservicestocommercial,educationalandgovernmentclients.Projectsaretypicallysmallscale(<100lbs.polymer)trialsthatserveastestofconceptforourclients.ProjectsarecarriedoutusingequipmenthousedintheOlsonResearchCenterandtheNationalPolymerInnovationCenter.

The APTSTrainingDivisionstrivestobetheworld’sleadingproviderofeffectiveworkforcedevelopmentthroughhands-ontrainingcourseswithpilotandindustrialscaleequipmentlocatedonsite at18,500squarefootstate-of-the-artteachingfacilityonthecampusofTheUniversityofAkron.Qualifiedinstructorsare available toservicetrainingneeds.

Akron Rubber Development Laboratory, Inc.

Akron Rubber Development Laboratory (ARDL) has established itself as a leading international independent laboratory dedicated to providing testing, development and problem solving services to all facets of the rubber and plastic industries. ARDL has the experience, expertise & resources to be a single-source lab, not only for standardized testing & analysis, but for custom non-routine services as well. ARDL has demonstrated over many years, the complete in-house capability, equipment and expertise in compound development, mixing, curing and testing rubber compounds for industrial and military applications to meet the needs of multiple industries and applications. Services include: Chemical Testing; Mechanical/Physical Testing; Engineering/Dynamic Testing; Microscopy; Forensic Services; andPlastics Testing. ARDL volunteers in several ASTM International committees including D11 (Rubber and Rubber Like Materials.

Page 31

http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/tires/products/catalog/

http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/tires/products/catalog/


Asphalt Pavement and Recycling Technologies, Inc.ddD

Asphalt Pavement and Recycling Technologies, Inc. (APART) was formed in April 2001, by Steven Escobar and Robert Staugaard. APART has 75 years of combined experience in the testing and evaluation of asphalt binders and mixtures. APART is an AASHTO accredited laboratory specializing in the testing of asphalt binders, emulsions, mixes and related materials.

CalRecovery, Inc.

CalRecovery, Inc. was incorporated in the State of California in 1975. The firm has been involved in all aspects of waste management since that time, with a special emphasis on highest and best use of waste-derived materials. Our work includes basic and applied research, feasibility studies, planning, design, field and performance testing, formal and informal training, and implementation of integrated waste management systems and programs. CalRecovery offers a broad range of services in waste management to both the public and private sectors.

Present company activities include solid waste management strategic planning, design of sustainable and zero waste community systems, technical assistance, engineering design, and procurement of various types of waste management systems for municipal and private companies.

In line with the company's involvement in maximum utilization of waste and energy resources, CalRecovery utilizes a highly qualified staff of professionals for developing, evaluating, and implementing cost-effective solid waste management systems. The firm has assisted various clients in their goals of collecting, processing, and marketing of materials as well as worked with end users to incorporate waste-derived materials into their product lines. To support recycling of materials and development of products and end uses, company staff are members of and participate in various ASTM International committees including: D11 (Rubber), D11.20.01 (Recycled Rubber), D36 (Recovered Carbon Black), D20 (Plastics) and D34 (Waste Management).

Disability Access Consultants (DAC)

Disability Access Consultants (DAC) offers a full continuum of accessibility compliance services and software to assist business and public entities in compliance with local, state and federal laws and regulations. As one of the nation’s largest consulting firms specializing in accessibility compliance, Disability Access Consultants has earned a reputation for providing low cost, effective barrier removal solutions in an easy to use format.DKE- FCS Service Provider tasked to perform technical assistance in the development of a product for manufacturer.

Page 32


DAC was formed in 1998 to assist public entities in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, and related accessibility requirements, regulations and standards. DAC has offices from coast to coast to provide nationwide services to our customers. All our accessibility specialists are trained in federal and state regulations. Disability Access Consultants (DAC) is the 2010 recipient of the ADA Green Award, presented by the ADA National Network at the ADA Symposium in Denver, Colorado on June 21st.DKE- FCS Subcontractor tasked to assist in development of product for manufacturer.

Hamilton Associates

Hamilton Associates has many years of experience managing projects ranging from marketing, organizational development, Information technology and human resources. Monte spent the early parts of his career in banking and human resources with a major California bank. He then performed as a consultant with a major CPA firm providing human resources consulting. Since 1994 he has provided project management to online publications and general internet consulting including SEO and Social Media disciplines. Hamilton Associates has been a subcontractor to DK Enterprises in CalRecycle’s TBAP, TOMA and FCS contracts.

IAPMO R&T Lab

Backed by more than 80 years of IAPMO experience, IAPMO R&T Lab is a trusted name for independent testing, research, and technical services in the plumbing and mechanical industries. We are accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 and are capable of testing to more than 400 standards as well as providing special services such as Research and Development, training, quality assurance, failure analysis, and witness/field testing.

IAPMO R&T Lab is committed to providing quality testing services at competitive rates in a timely manner. We offer one-stop testing for fast track listing in the U.S., Canadian, and Australian markets. Our knowledgeable staff will work with you to simplify the testing and certification process, helping get your product to market faster.DKE- FCS Service Provider tasked to perform material testing in the development of three tire-derived product for a tire-derived product manufacturer.

Intertek

For more than 130 years, companies around the world have depended on Intertek to help ensure the quality and safety of their products, processes and systems. We go beyond testing, inspecting and certifying products; we are a Total Quality Assurance provider to industries wworldwide. Through our global network of state-of-the-art facilities and industry-leading technical expertise we provide innovative and bespoke Assurance, Testing, Inspection and Certification services to customers. We provide a systemic approach to supporting our customers’ Quality Assurance efforts in each of the areas of their operations including R&D, raw materials sourcing, components suppliers, manufacturing, transportation, distribution and retail channels, and consumer management.

Intertek is an industry leader with more than 43,000 employees in 1,000 locations in over 100 countries. We deliver Total Quality Assurance expertise 24 hours a day, 7 days a week with our industry-winning

Page 33


processes and customer-centric culture. Whether your business is local or global, we can help to ensure that your products meet quality, health, environmental, safety, and social accountability standards for virtually any market around the world. We hold extensive global accreditations, recognitions, and agreements, and our knowledge of and expertise in overcoming regulatory, market, and supply chain hurdles is unrivalled. DKE-FCS Service Provider tasked to assist in material testing at multiple Intertek testing facilities for several tire-derived product manufacturers.

JPS Design Group

guide them in a disciplined way through a product development process in which many options are considered, and a focus developed. We begin by employing an interdisciplinary team that observes people at work and play to discover their habits. These observations produce insights that lead to

identification of opportunities and new directions. Our observations add value to products, stimulate brand identification and even suggest new product classes. We employ a four-phase process that takes products from an idea to a production-ready design rves people at work and play to discover their habits. These observations produce insights that lead to

MindFlow Design

MindFlow Design is an innovative Southern California-based product development company that strategically develops products for our clients who range from start-ups to Fortune 100 companies. We employ a user-centric design approach fueled by the process of discovery and years of experience designing and engineering successful products. Clients hire us because they need a strategic partner to guide them in a disciplined way through a product development process in which many options are considered, and a focus developed. We begin by employing an interdisciplinary team that observes people at work and play to discover their habits. These observations produce insights that lead to identification of opportunities and new directions. Our observations add value to products, stimulate brand identification and even suggest new product classes. We employ a four-phase process that takes products from an idea to a production-ready design with full engineering specifications. Our assets include a vendor network with both domestic and overseas manufacturing partners. Today, a comprehensive product development process is critical. MindFlow Design will help you ensure marketplace success through aggressive scheduling combined with a disciplined, cost-effective approach.

For the FCS project, Mindflow’s team of engineers and manufacturing specialists will be available on an on-call basis to provide advice, feedback, engineering and technical support to help manufacturers incorporate crumb rubber. Services may include: researching and investigating means and methods to improve the color durability of molded recycled rubber products; optimizing the design of products made from recycled rubber for manufacturing; optimizing manufacturing processes, workflow, equipment, and manufacturing floor layout to increase manufacturing efficiency of recycled rubber

Page 34


products; reviewing tool and part costs and identify ways to increase operational efficiencies; and conducting engineering analysis of rubber materials, paints, and adhesives to improve performance.

Middleton & Associates

More than 15 years of startup and turnaround manufacturing experience focusing on engineering and plant operations – paired with a chemical engineering degree. Efficient project manager known for opening facilities ahead of schedule and within budget.Highly knowledgeable about EPA and environmental quality TSCA rules and regulations.Built solid relationships within the recycling and reclamation industries.

Provided technical assistance to the CalRecycle - DK Enterprises Feedstock Conversion Services projects related to adhesives, coatings, and compounding.To support recycling of materials and development of products and end uses, James Middleton, Principal, participates in various ASTM International committees including: D11 (Rubber), D11.20.01 (Recycled Rubber), D20 (Plastics) and D36 (Recovered Carbon Black, Recording Secretary).DKE- FCS Service Provider tasked to assist in technical services in the development of tire-derived products.

Modern Concepts, Inc.

Modern Concepts, Inc. is based in Southern California and is primarily a compounder serving a wide variety of manufacturing clients across North America. In addition, Modern Concepts can provide independent sieve testing and other testing services adhering to ASTM standards. Modern Concepts also has the capacity to prepare test samples of compounded materials to facilitate manufacturer progress with Activity Plans, as appropriate. Modern Concepts was formed in 1983 by Richard Warpack and provides compounds and manufacturing support to the aerospace, automotive, sports, marine, medical and many other industries that will beneficial and valued to the FCS program.

Momentum Technologies International

Momentum Technologies International, a Division of RCMA Americas, Inc. brings thetechnology to the marketplace with a full range of Laboratory Services. MTi provides technical support and services for every product in their distribution portfolio. In addition, MTi’s ISO 17025 Accredited laboratory provides a wide range of fee-based testing and development services for rubber, natural latex, asphalt paving and roofing, adhesives, coatings and plastic applications. MTI has a wide variety of accreditations.

Nemo ETC, Inc.

NEMO ETC., LLC is a firm of engineers, technicians and research specialists with over 80 years combined experience working in the field of building envelope engineering, evaluation, testing, consulting and certification. We perform code-compliance evaluations, design test programs, design cladding systems

Page 35


for wind-load resistance and conduct laboratory and on-site testing of building envelope components and systems. We are an ISO 17020 accredited inspection entity and our two laboratories, located in Oxford, CT and Columbia, SC are ISO 17025 accredited.

NGC Testing Services

NGC Testing Services features one of North America's most sophisticated and unique, fully accredited independent testing facilities. Full-scale fire, acoustical, analytical and structural testing is performed at a single location. NGC evaluates a wide range of materials and products, including building materials, construction systems and assemblies. Our complex near Buffalo, NY, offers state-of-the-art laboratories for testing product performance and quality. Our facilities include a complete acoustical testing complex and three full-scale furnaces in a 40,000-square-foot fire-testing laboratory. High capacity overhead cranes and large access openings to the facility enables the handling of the largest full-scale test specimens. New products and new or expanded uses for existing products require building code listings. We have years of experience working with code officials and certifying agencies and we can assist clients with determining and completing tests required for approval. We understand cost and scheduling are concerns. Therefore, we feature cost-effective pricing and quick test turnaround. Our goal: customer satisfaction. Our laboratory provides test programs, from the developmental stage through the certification process, conducted in accordance with standards developed by the following: ASTM, ULC, NFPA, UL, FM, UBC, and ISO. Provided testing services in prior CalRecycle Tire-Derived Product Business Assistance Program.

NSL Analytical Services

NSL Analytical Services is an independent commercial testing laboratory specializing in inorganic elemental chemical analysis, polymer and powder evaluation, mechanical and metallurgical testing, with optical and SEM (Scanning Electron) microscopy services.

Founded in 1945, NSL maintains numerous quality approvals including ISO/IEC 17025, US-Consumer Product Safety Commission, Nadcap (aerospace and defense), and NQA-1 (nuclear safety related) to help customers achieve the highest standards of product quality from design to launch by providing accurate, reliable and repeatable materials testing results through Trust, Technology and Turnaround. DKE- FCS Service Provider tasked to assist in material testing services.

PRI Construction Materials Technologies

PRI Construction Materials Technologies (PRI-CMT) is an accredited, independent, third-party technical services organization. Our objective is to provide the finest in testing, inspection, and support services for our clients. From product development programs to code approval testing, from quality assurance inspections to litigation support, PRI-CMT meets a variety of unique needs. As an ISO/IEC 17025 Testing Laboratory (International Accreditation Service TL-189) and an ISO/IEC 17020 Inspection Agency (International Accreditation Service AA-709), our work is accepted by numerous code authorities and listing entities including, ICC-ES, Miami-Dade, State of Florida, The City of Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety, Texas Department of Insurance (TDI), IAPMO, Canadian Construction Materials Centre (CCMC),

Page 36


Air Barrier Association of America (ABAA), Sealant Waterproofing & Restoration Institute (SWRI), Cool Roof Rating Council (CRRC), Energy Star, American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA) and many more. By working closely with code authorities, we enable our clients to achieve their approvals in an expedited and cost-effective manner. PRI is based in Tampa, FL. Our expertise encompasses the entire building envelope; our accreditations cover a wide range of products, including, but not limited to, roof covering systems, exterior wall systems, and foundation & subfloor systems. PRI evaluates basic material properties, including chemical, mechanical, optical, physical and thermal analyses. PRI also evaluates mock assemblies/constructions for performance, including: 1) Air & Water Infiltration; 2) Impact & Puncture Resistance; 3) Structural Loading (Shear (Racking) Loading and Static & Cyclic Transverse Loading; and 4) Wind Resistance (Dynamic & Static Simulations (Wind-Driven Rain Resistance and Wind Uplift Resistance.Tasked to assist in material testing in previous CalRecycle TBAP for a tire-derived-product roofing manufacturer.

Recycling Research Institute

Mary Sikora is a principal of the Recycling Research Institute (RRI) and editor of the Scrap Tire News. She has been involved with the scrap tire recycling industry for thirty-two years providing leadership in identifying industry trends, setting direction and facilitating solutions in both public and private tire recycling sectors. Ms.Sikora is the former Director of Tire and Rubber Recycling for the Tire Industry Association, a consulting position she held with the Association for eighteen years. In this capacity, Ms. Sikora developed tire recycling programs, educational tools and marketing and promotional strategies for the tire industry. She developed and facilitated educational workshops, seminars and training forums for tire recyclers and other tire industry members. Ms. Sikora developed and fostered strategic partnerships with other industry organizations and firms to represent and promote tire recycling across all segments of the industry. Mary Sikorais now working with the association’s environmental committee to develop industry best practices and other educational materials. Service Provider in market development in previous CalRecycle TBAP contract.

RWR Strategies

Mr. Randy Russell isa Bay Area waste management specialist with expertise in resource conservation, solid waste planning, construction and demolition debris management, and recycling markets developmentwith a focus on local/state compliance programs and public-private partnerships. Mr. Russell is a leading expert inwaste tire management and recycling supporting CalRecycle’s statewide Waste Tire Management Program since 2011 reporting on annual waste tire generation and material flows; cultivating B2B relationships for recycled-content product development; providing technical assistance to local jurisdictions and architect firms for new construction; and sourcing recycled feedstocks for product manufacturers. He supports the Cities of San Jose and San Francisco’s Construction & Demolition Debris Diversion (CDDD) programs by conducting annual operation evaluations to verify and certify C&D Recovery Facilities. As a Contractor to StopWaste he also supports the County’s Mandatory Recycling Ordinance (MRO) as a business assistance representative for large quantity generators and helping them into MRO compliance.

Page 37


Under subcontract to Boisson Consulting, Mr. Russell coordinates outreach, continuing education and market development of state-generated waste tire material forCalRecycle’s Tire Outreach and Market Analysis (TOMA2) Contract. Randy supports the annual waste tire market report with data analysis and surveying of industry stakeholders. Mr. Russell was Project Coordinator of the CalRecycle -Leidos/Louis Berger Tire-Derived Product Business Assistance Program intended to increase the market demand for recycled tire rubber.DKE- FCS Service Provider tasked to perform technical services.

Peter B. Sebally, Ph.D.

Peter E. Sebaaly is a Professor of Civil Engineering and the Director of the Pavement Engineering & Science Program at the University of Nevada, Reno. Dr. Sebaaly is a registered professional engineer in the states of Nevada and Arizona. Dr. Sebaaly has over 30 years of experience in research and development in the areas of asphalt materials, pavement design, rehabilitation and construction. One of the most notable contributions of DrSebaaly’s work is his significant contributions to the recycling of tire rubber and old asphalt pavements to develop cost effective and environment friendly paving materials. Dr. Sebaaly conducts research and consulting services for a wide range of agencies and private industry in the U.S. and throughout the world.

TUV SUD America

For almost 150 years, TÜV SÜD has been working to make oour world a safer and more sustainable place. We provide services for testing, certification, engineering audits, and training to a large variety of industries. We ensure your products are safe, reliable and ready for the U.S. and global marketplace. The International Play Equipment Manufacturers Association (IPEMA) utilizes TÜV SUD America as their independent validator to perform inspections and tests, and review manufacturer’s records on a periodic basis. Surface systems are tested for compliance with all applicable portions of the ASTM F1292, Standard Specification for Impact Attenuation of Surfacing Materials within the Use Zone of Playground Equipment. Additionally, TUV SUD America performs inspections, witness tests and review manufacturer’s test data on a periodic basis specific to Public playground equipment. Product(s) are tested for compliance with all applicable portions of the current ASTM or CAN/CSA Standard. TUV SUD’s U.S. headquarters is in Peabody, MA. TUV has performed material testing for TDP manufacturers awarded grants in TBAP. Service Provider of material testing in previous CalRecycle TBAP contract.

Twining, Inc.

Twining’s legacy dates back more than 100 years. What started as a family business in 1898 has evolved into one of California’s largest service providers of geotechnical, materials testing, and construction inspection services. Twining is a full-service engineering and quality control company with unmatched technical expertise. As detailed below, our services span from QA/QC, materials testing, and inspection, to highly technical capabilities in applied engineering and integrated disciplines. With laboratories throughout California and over 150 inspectors, we are unequaled in our core competencies to work on vertical as well as horizontal construction projects: Geotechnical engineering; Concrete engineering; Concrete construction consulting; Evaluations of existing structures; Asphalt pavement quality assurance services;

Page 38


Asphalt pavement design and materials evaluations ;Soil and material testing and inspection; Specialty testing; Mobile laboratory services; Roofing and waterproofing consultation and inspection;Applied engineering and research; Forensic evaluation; Stormwater management; and Commissioning.DKE- FCS Service Provider tasked to perform material testing in the development of a tire-derived product for a manufacturer.

UL LLC

UL certifies, validates, tests, verifies, inspects, audits, advises and educates. We provide the knowledge and expertise to help navigate growing complexities across the supply chain from compliance and regulatory issues to trade challenges and market access. UL is a global leader in testing, inspection, certification, auditing and validation.The UL Mark is the single most accepted Certification Mark in the United States, appearing on 22 billion products annually.

UL works with a diverse array of stakeholders. We optimize the supply chain for manufacturers and provide them a broad range of services that support every stage of the product life cycle. UL works with retailers, we consult with governments and we collaborate on standards that create level playing fields.

Western Fire Center

Western Fire Center is based in Kelso, WA, and is accredited through ICC-ES per ISO 19025 standards and guidelines. Western Fire has been in business since 1994 and we have maintained our accreditation through ICC-ES per ISO 19025 standards and guidelines since then. Completion information on our credentials and accreditations can be found on www.icc.org (test lab 180). We have conducted the E108 roof test apparatus this entire time and is still one of our major income generators. We are known in the industry very well and have years of experience doing these types of tests. Specifically, Western Fire Center is accredited by the International Accreditation Service for pertinent ASTM and other standards in the testing fields of: Fire Testing of Building Assemblies; Interior Finish; Fire Stops/Dampers; Fire Doors; Fire Windows; Roof Coverings; Thermal Barriers; Furniture; Physical Tests and Decking Materials. Western Fire Center was tasked in previous CalRecycle TBAP contracts to perform material testing for manufacturers.

Wilson Business Integrators, Inc. (DBA The Wilson Group) DVBE

Wilson Business Integrators, Inc. (d.b.a. The Wilson Group) is a twenty-nine-year-old California based DVBE corporation that holds the (CMAS) Multiple Awards Schedule and the CVE certification as a Service-Disabled Veteran owned Small Business (SDVOSB). Established in 1989 by (Former USAF 1/LT, Bruce R. Wilson, a Viet Nam-Era Instructor Navigator Bombardier.

Initially, a national leader in emergency and disaster planning, The Wilson Group has delivered emergency planning and management services for a great many Federal, state and local government agencies. These services covered disciplines that ranged from disaster preparedness, to bioterrorism. From continuity of government to clinic emergency response.From dam inundation to IT Security, and from Statewide Emergency stakeholder coordination to continuity of operations.

Page 39


The company subsequently branched out to provide services to all public agencies, schools, non-profit agencies, businesses, and other private organizations in the task of developing and administering strategic and visionary disaster management solutions using high level oversight and focused operational services, as well as staffing and hands-on operations.

Service Specialties include: Facilities Management, Domestic Terrorism Preparedness, Risk Management, Environmental Assessment; Project Management and Oversight, Business Process Improvement, Workflow Automation, Training and Development and more.

Page 40

5. QUALIFICATIONS AND RESOURCESDenise Kennedy of DK Enterprises, Inc., in partnership with Ed Boisson of Boisson Consulting, have assembled a team that provides the full range of qualifications and resources that will be needed in the FCS Program. Table 6 below summarizes our key team members, their roles in the project and their areas of knowledge and experience most pertinent to the project. Resumes provided in Appendix C provide additional details on each person’s experience, education, knowledge and capabilities.

Table 6: Summary of Team Members’ Pertinent Knowledge and Experience

Team Member

Calif

orni

a Ti

re R

ecyc

ling

Flow

s an

d M

arke

ts

Feed

stoc

k Co

nver

sion

Busi

ness

Ass

ista

nce

Serv

ices

Busi

ness

Pra

ctic

es

Mar

ketin

g TD

Ps

Rubb

er P

rodu

ct

Man

ufac

turin

g / Q

ualit

y Co

ntro

l

Man

ufac

turin

g En

gine

erin

g

Prod

uct T

estin

g an

d Ce

rtific

atio

n

Abili

ty to

Man

ufac

ture

Tes

t Sa

mpl

es

Proj

ect a

nd

Activ

ity P

lan

Man

agem

ent

Denise Kennedy, DK Enterprises, Inc. (Project Manager and Co-Manufacturer Assistance Manager/Testing Lead)

X X X X X X

George Savage, CalRecovery, Inc.Boisson Consulting (Assistant Project Manager and Co-Manufacturer Assistance Manager)

X X X X

Proj

ect

Supp

ort

Randy Russell, Louis Berger Group (Project Coordinator) X X X X

Bruce Wilson, Brian Fitzgerald RPE.DVBE (Administrative Support) X

On-

Call S

pecia

lists

and

Adv

isors

Richard Warpack, Owner, Modern Concepts, Inc. (Rubber-Plastic Compound and Manufacturing Specialist)

X X X X X

Bonnie Stuck, Akron Rubber Development Laboratory (Rubber Manufacturing Specialist) X X X X X X

Zack Priest, PRI Construction Material Technologies (Product Testing Specialist) X X X X X

Warne T. Hall, Momentum Technologies International (Product Testing Specialist) X X X

Randy Meirowitz, PhD Chemist, Mindflow Design (Materials Specialist) X X X XAndy Moulds, Sr. Mechanical Engineer, Mindflow Design (Product Dev. Specialist) X X X X X

Prod

uct T

estin

g an

d Ce

rtific

atio

n

Akron Rubber Development Laboratory, Inc. X XQAI Laboratories XAsphalt Pavement and Recycling Technologies XPRI Construction Materials Technology XMomentum Technologies XNGC Testing Services XWestern Fire Center XTUV SUD America X

Page 41

Section 5 Qualifications and Resources

Our team is 100 percent committed to continuing our long-standing partnership with CalRecycleby collaborating to refine and implement this innovative new program. While feedstock conversion is challenging, we have built a base of experience through three TBAP contracts that allows us to hit the ground running immediately, leveraging our well-established industry relationships and the many lessons learned working with crumb rubber processors and manufacturers involved in feedstock conversion activities. And, we are currently implementing the complementary CalRecycle TOMA program, with Louis Berger Group as prime contractor, allowing us to directly coordinate the two projects to allocate CalRecycle resources as effectively as possible. (The total time commitment for lead team members between the two projects and other commitments is within our regular 40 hour work weeks over the course of the two contracts.)

The work products provided under Appendix D illustrate our team’s experience and qualifications specifically related to CalRecycle scrap tire market development, business assistance and feedstock conversion activities:

The Outlook for Crumb Rubber Feedstock Conversion, September 2013. This was prepared by Ed Boisson and Denise Kennedy for Leidos Engineering, LLC under the 3rdCalRecycle Tire-Derived Product Business Assistance Program. This report summarizes assistance services primarily provided by or directed by Denise Kennedy to ten TBAP grantees involved in feedstock conversion or new TDP development, with task coordination by Randy Russell and overall project management by Ed Boisson.

Best Management Practices for Tire-Derived Product Development, September 2013. Prepared by Denise Kennedy with support by Chris Scoville of QAI Laboratories. This report describes the application of quality assurance and quality control procedures in the TDP arena, with a focus on developing standards for TDPs.

TBAP Grants Contract Final Report, September 2013. Prepared by Ed Boisson and Randy Russell, this report summarizes the provision of over $2.4 million in services to 22 firms, including 10 feedstock conversion firms. The Leidos prime contractor team was managed by Ed Boisson with service tasks coordinated by Randy Russell and feedstock conversion technical, marketing and assistance services directed primarily by Denise Kennedy. All of the subcontractors proposed under this FCS contract also participated in the TBAP grants contract described in this report. Ed Boisson managed three of the four TBAP grant cycles, and Denise Kennedy was by far the most requested technical assistance provider in the TBAP program, having directed assistance activities with numerous California processors and TDP manufacturers.

Following is a more detailed description the key team members’ qualifications and the role they will play in the project.Project and Activity Plan Management

Denise Kennedy, founder and president of DKE Enterprises, Inc. brings over 27 years of experience in tire recycling and the tire derived product (TDP) industry to the companies that she represents as a consultant, an industry stakeholder and speaker at international conferences and workshops. Since 2006 Denise has played a key role within the contractor teams for CalRecycle’s Tire Derived Product Business Assistance Program (TBAP) and currently the Tire Outreach and Market Analysis (TOMA) Project. Under these contracts she serves as principal industry liaison, surveying California tire industry, analyzing scrap tire flows and identifying market trends, barriers and opportunities. DK Enterprises

Page 42


provides services to help companies develop market, business and performance strategies, coordinate and assist with new product development testing protocols and certification, qualify products for LEED contribution, assist with market collateral and web design, prepare waste tire hauler and facility permits, and assist with site selection and permitting related activities.

In 2013, as a subcontractor to Leidos under TBAP, Ms. Kennedy prepared “Best Management Practices for Tire-Derived Product Development”and “Establishing Best Management Practices for Recycled Tire Rubber Playground Surfaces to Comply with the New ADA Accessible Design Requirements.” And in the TOMA Project (also primed by Leidos) she is producing the California Tire Derived Product Catalog that will be posted on CalRecycle’s web site in June of 2014. Denise is an enthusiastic booster for California tire recycling, and has encouraged TBAP participants and tire derived product manufacturers to participate in national tire recycling conferences and Big Box buyer showcases which has resulted in additional market opportunities and growth. Ms. Kennedy has built a solid reputation for successful networking capabilities and delivering value added solutions to manufacturers, processors, distributors and their supply chain. Denise Kennedy is an active member on many different national scrap tire initiatives including the US EPA Scrap Tire Work Group Committees; US Mexico Border 2020 Work Group; Synthetic Turf Council; Rubber Pavement Association; Tire Industry Association; Retread Tire Association; and the Tire Retread and Repair Information Bureau.

Under the FCS contract, Denise will serve as Project Manager and Co-Manufacturing Assistance Manager with Ed Boisson, and will lead coordination of material and product testing services. Our plan is that each participating manufacturer will be assigned either Denise or Ed to oversee completion of their Activity Plan, although both leads will be involved to a degree with all firms. As Project Manager, Denise will also be responsible for the delivery of all work products and for satisfying Work Plan requirements on time and on budget. John Siebert, through his association with DK Enterprises, will provide graphic design services, if needed, related to marketing materials and case studies.

George Savage, Principal, Boisson Consulting, has 27 years of experience in recycling industry development working in the private and public sectors. In January 2014, after working for ten years as Senior Consultant with Leidos (formally SAIC and R.W. Beck), Ed restarted the recycling consulting practice he had previously led from 1998 – 2004. Ed has managed numerous large, complex projects involving multiple subcontractors, including two of the three TBAP business assistance contracts (involving three separate TBAP grant cycles) and all three of the TBAP industry wide contracts. Since 2005 Ed has specialized in scrap tire recycling market development. Among many special projects under CalRecycle TBAP contracts he designed and led six annual California market studies, co-authored a 2013 report on feedstock conversion progress, opportunities and barriers and had overall responsibility for overseeing business assistance services to over 40 California tire processors and TDP manufacturers/vendors. He has also conducted scrap tire market studies for the State of New York and for Ontario Tire Stewardship in Ontario, Canada. Ed has developed close relationships with California tire recycling businesses and has frequently worked one-on-one with recycling business owners and staff. Ed has a B.A. degree physics from the University of California, Santa Cruz, and an M.S. degree in Environmental Systems, with an emphasis in Environmental Resources Engineering, from Humboldt State University.

In the FCS project, Ed will serve as Assistant Project Manager and, with Denise Kennedy, as co-Manufacturing Technical Assistance Manager.

Page 43


Project Coordination and Support

Randy Russell of the Louis Berger Group, Inc. has proven experience coordinating contractor teams in the design and delivery of technical assistance services to California recycling businesses. He served as assistant Project Manager for CalRecycle’s Tire-Derived Product Business Assistance Program (TBAP), with lead responsibility for overseeing delivery of over $2.5 million in technical assistance services to 22 California tire recycling businesses by specialized subcontractors, with a focus on marketing and product testing. He currently serves as Project Manager on the CalRecycle Tire Outreach and Market Analysis Program, and conducts in-person outreach presentations to local government agencies and private architects regarding the benefits of tire-derived products, and assists them with state grant funding opportunities. Mr. Russell worked directly with several California local jurisdictions, serving as a lead researcher in an audit of Alameda County recycling programs. He holds an M.S. degree in Industrial Ecology & Sustainability from Antioch University and a B.S. degree in Media Production from Ohio University. For the FCS contract, Randy will serve as Project Coordinator, providing support to Co-Activity Plan Managers Boisson and Kennedy in assigning subcontractor tasks, tracking progress and accomplishments and compiling research as needed.

Nancy Woods of Brian Fitzgerald RPE.DVBE will provide additional project support, including compiling documents, tracking progress, scheduling meetings and other activities to provide efficient support to the project leads.

On-Call Technical Assistance Specialists and Advisors

Our Project Team includes several individuals with very strong qualifications and experience related to rubber/plastic compounding and manufacturing, manufacturing engineering, quality assurance/quality control and new product development, with a considerable base of experience working with California tire recycling manufacturers under the TBAP Program. We expect to call upon these specialists on an as-needed basis during the contract to provide advice and technical assistance to participating manufacturers, as called for within approved Activity Plans. Several of these individuals are also affiliated with product testing or certification firms, and will play an active role in coordinating services as needed.

Richard Warpack, owner of Modern Concepts will serve as Rubber-Plastic Compounding and Manufacturing Specialist. Richard will be providing consulting, direction and support in the formulation of extruded products and best management practices in determining “proof of concept.” Mr. Warpack worked with three California feedstock conversion/product development companies under the TBAP program, helping them to evaluate and develop rubber-plastic or rubber compounding solutions. Mr. Warpack has over 40 years of experience in the compounding industry, and is the President/CEO of Modern Concepts, Inc. and Perma Lite Plastics, Inc. Richard has been in the compounding industry for 43 years and formed his company, Modern Concepts in 1983 and Perma Lite Plastics in 2013. Mr. Warpack provides the experience and knowledge in formulating compounds for the aerospace, automotive, sports, marine, medical and many other industries that will beneficial and valued to the FCS program.

Bonnie Stuckjoined ARDL in January, 2009 and has decades of experience across broad sectors of the rubber and plastics industries, with proven problem-solving capabilities and expertise. Bonnie’s previous work experience includes time at B.F. Goodrich, Bridgestone Firestone and Sovereign Chemical.

Page 44


Most recently, Bonnie was Senior Vice President of Technical/Operations at Chem Technologies. She has published numerous technical papers, holds four patents and has given lectures at Capital University, the University of Michigan and the University of Akron.

Andy Moulds, Principal and Sr. Mechanical Engineer, Mindflow Design, will serve as Product Development Specialist, and will coordinate services from Mindflow Design’s team. Andy’s duties include engineering, engineering team management, and company operations. Previously, Mr. Moulds held various engineering, development, and management positions at RoboDesign, Ismeca, North Sails, and Digital Equipment Corp. As vice president of engineering, he helped grow a start-up company to more than $10 million dollars in sales. In 2004, he started Controlled Motions, an engineering consulting firm. He also has experience as a product manager and project manager. Mr. Moulds has developed many products and medical devices over the past 19 years including medical instruments, diagnostics, disposables, industrial lasers, inkjet cartridges, implantable devices, consumer goods, military instruments, drug discovery instruments, and hospital pharmacy equipment. He has been granted fifteen patents for his work.

Randy Meirowitz, PhD Chemistry,will provide technical advice and assistance related to material formulations and properties. Randy has over 25 yearsof experience in technology development and management of technical organizations with special emphasis on surface properties of material. Outstanding expertise in research, development, intellectual property, outreach and training. Demonstrated achievements across polymer, advanced materials, personnel care products, and pharmaceutical separations industries. Proven ability to apply information and solutions across different industries.Exceptional record for public presentations of technical information to non-technical audiences.Outstanding ability to reach corporate goals through development and management of project portfolios. Corporate experience ranges from early stage start up to Fortune 100.

Our product testing partners also offer a wealth of expertise that may be tapped as manufacturing assistant specialists and/or testing specialists. Examples for whom we have included resumes below include Warne T. Hall of Momentum Technologies International and Zack Priest of PRI Construction Materials Technologies.

Product Testing and Certification

The nine testing and certification firms that we have partnered with are described in the previous section. Combined, these firms have the capacity to provide the full range of product testing and certification services likely to be needed under the FCS Program. Moreover, our project leaders and coordination team have worked with most of these firms to provide numerous diverse testing and certification services to California tire processors and TDP firms under previous TBAP contracts. In short, we understand the capabilities of these firms and how to work with them to deliver needed results. Table 7 lists a sampling of tests completed by our partnering product testing firms for TDPs under the last TBAP contract. Following is a brief summary of the types of product tests and certification services offered. Additional information is provided above on each firm, in Section 4 Organization.

Page 45


Table 7: Sample of Product Tests Performed for TDPs by BC Team Members Under TBAP

Product ASTM Standard Test Product ASTM Standard Test

ASTM E 283, ASTM E 2178, and ASTM E 2357 Air Leakage; Air Permeance E84 Flammability

ASTM C836 Stability E84Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials

ASTM E96,B WVT Test Report ASTM C 2369Volatile Content of Coatings (VOCs)

ASTM C794 Peel Adhesion ASTM D 2565 Accelerated Weathering TestASTM D4833 Puncture Resistance ASTM E 96 Liquid PermeabilityASTM D751 Resistance to Hydrostatic Head ASTM D 412 Elongation Test

ASTM C836 Shore Hardness ASTM E 108Fire Test of Roof Coverings (Class A)

ASTM D412 Elongation ASTM C 518 Thermal Resistance

ASTM D412 (Die C) Tensile Strenght ASTM E 2178 Air PermeabilityASTM D1970 Water Absorbtion ASTM C 1305 Crack BridgingASTM D638 Tensile Strength ASTM D 522 FlexibilityASTM D790 Flexural Strength C1353 Abrasion ResistanceUL1897 Wind Resistance ASTM D1308 Effects of Cleaning ProductsUL1897 Assembly Construction C936 Freezing and Thawing CyclesAC07, Section 4.4 Uplift Bend ASTM C1028 Slip ResistentAC07, Section 4.5 Penetration C1028 Static Coefficient of FrictionASTM D1929 Ignition Temperature ASTM E84 Surface BurnASTM D635 Burn Rate RSI-15/85 Thermal ExpansionAC07, Section 4.9 Temperature Cycling C518 Thermal TransmitionASTM E1252 FTIR ASTM C1701 Water LoadingASTM E108 Fire Classification AASHTO M306 Water Loading

ASTM E108Fire Classification Supplies/Pre-Test Const.

E108 Retest of a single roof deck

AC07 Retest of uplift bend testIndoor

Flooring Tile UL 94 FlammabilityASTM C1549 Solar Reflectance FM 5-565 Proof Load Permeability

ASTM 6162

Physical Properties Specification for SBS membranes with Polyester and Glass Fiber E 1980 - 1 Solar Reflectance Index

ASTM 6164

Physical Properties Specification for SBS membranes with Polyester C 1028 Slip ResistancePo

ur-in

-Pla

ce P

ervio

us

Pave

men

t

Moi

stur

e Ba

rrie

rSh

ake

Roo

fing

Roo

fing

Mem

bran

e

PVC

Coa

ted

Rec

ycle

d Ti

re

Mat

eria

lPr

imer

, Cau

lking

, Top

Coa

tM

odul

ar S

idew

alks

or I

ndoo

r Tile

s

Page 46

APPENDIX A: COST PROPOSALThis appendix contains Boisson Consulting’s detailed cost proposal for completing the FCS Project. First we provide a summary and some background information. Following this, we provide Attachments A, B, B.1, B.2, B.3 and D, as required by the RFP.

Summary and Background Information

Table A-1 below summarizes our proposal cost, based on the table and information provided in the RFP on page 14, and elsewhere.

Table A-1 1:Summary of DK Enterprises, Inc. Consulting Proposal Costs

Personnel Role or Test Estimated Hours Rate from Cost Sheets1 TotalsProject Management Rate(individual that is responsible for the overall performance of all tasks/activities under the contract)

500 hours $165.00 $82,500.00

Manufacturer Technical Assistance Management Rate(individual that is directly responsible/accountable for preparing and ensuring appropriate execution of manufacturer activity plans)

1050 hours $181.50 $190,575.00

Project Coordinator Rate(individual responsible for specific projects within the contract)

250 hours $117.70 $29,425.00

Administrative Support Rate(individual[s] responsible for clerical/administrative support)

400 hours $82.50 $33,000.00

Testing Personnel(individual[s] responsible for performing tests other than when performing a Crumb Rubber Particle Size and Particle Size Distribution Test )

700 hours $181.50 $127,050.00

Manufacturing Specialist (individual[s] responsible for providing expert advice in the fields of manufacturing, quality assurance, or specialized product testing)

150 hours $181.50 $27,225.00

Crumb Rubber Particle Size and Particle Size Distribution Test, per ASTM D5644/D5603

300 Tests $220.00 $66,000.00

Total, Tasks 3-4 (Sum of above rows) $555,775.00Total, Tasks 1, 2 and 5 (from Attachment B) $194,130.50GRAND TOTAL $749,905.50

On the subsequent pages, we present the following cost proposal attachments as required in the RFP:

CONFIDENTIAL Page A-1


Attachment A Personnel Rate Sheet

Attachment B Cost Proposal Sheet

Attachment B.1 Cost Sheet for Scenario A

Attachment B.2 Cost Sheet for Scenario B

Attachment B.3 Cost Sheet for Scenario C

Attachment D Bidder Declaration

CONFIDENTIAL Page A-2

APPENDIX B: ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FORMS, ATTACHMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONSQualifications and Licenses

On the following pages is a copy of DK Enterprises’ registration with the California Secretary of State. We’ve also provided a copy of DK Enterprises Statement of Information documenting a change in address to the Secretary of State. DK Enterprises is an accredited business of Northeast California under the Better Business Bureau (#90018270). All subcontractors on this project are qualified to do business in California. Several team members hold engineering degrees and are, or have been licensed engineers in California or other jurisdictions.

SBE and DVBE Certifications

Following are certification reports (downloaded from the California Department of General Services web site at http://www.bidsync.com/DPXBisCASB) and original certification letters for: DK Enterprises (SB Micro),

Attachment F Darfur Contracting ActProvided on subsequent pages within this Appendix.

Attachment G Iran Contracting ActProvided on subsequent pages within this Appendix.

Attachment H Contractor Status FormProvided on subsequent pages within this Appendix for DK Enterprises.

Attachment J Client References

Provided on subsequent pages within this Appendix are Attachment J References for the following firms:

DK Enterprises, Inc. Akron Rubber Development Laboratory, Inc. Asphalt Pavement and Recycling Technologies, Inc. CalRecovery, Inc. Disability Access Consultants Hamilton & Associates JPS Design Group IAPMO R&T Lab Intertek Mindflow Design Modern Concepts Momentum Technologies Nemo ETC, LLC

Page B-1

http://www.bidsync.com/DPXBisCASB


NSL Analytical Services PRI Construction Materials Technologies, LLC Recycling Research Institute RWR Strategies Peter Sebaaly The Wilson Group, DVBE TUV SUD America Twining, Inc. Western Fire Center

Page C-22


Page C-23


Page C-24

APPENDIX C: RESUMESResumes are included on the subsequent pages within this Appendix for the following key individuals:

Denise Kennedy, President, DKE Enterprises, Inc. (DBA DK Enterprises)

Project Manager, Manufacturing Technical Assistance Manager, Testing/Certification Coordination Lead

Crittenden Ohlemacher, Ph.D., Testing Division, Applied Polymer Research Center (APTS)

Testing Personnel (University of Akron)

Theodore Nelson, VP of Technology, Akron Rubber Development Laboratory, Inc. (ARDL), Testing Personnel

Sean Djuricic, Sales Development Manager, Akron Rubber Development Laboratory, Inc.

Manufacturing Specialist (Material Specialist)

Bonnie Stuck, Senior Technical Advisor, Akron Rubber Development Laboratory, Inc. (ARDL)

Manufacturing Specialist (Material Specialist)

George Savage, Executive Vice President, CalRecovery, Inc., CA Registered Engineer

Manufacturing Technical Assistance Manager Assistant, Manufacturing Specialist

Louis Diaz, President, CalRecovery, Inc., Ph.D., Environmental Engineering

Manufacturing Specialist

Cheryl Henry, CalRecovery, Inc., Administrative Support Technical Assistance

Barbara Thorpe, President, Disability Access Consultants (DAC), Manufacturing Specialist

Michael Boga, Senior Director, Disability Access Consultants (DAC), Manufacturing Specialist

Monte Hamilton, Owner, Hamilton Associates

Administrative Support/Graphics/Marketing

Architectural Testing (An Intertek Company), International Accreditation Service

Material Specialist, Multiple Locations

John Siebert, JPS Design Group, Graphic Design / Video Support

James Middleton, Middleton & Associates, Chemical Engineer, Manufacturing Specialist

Andy Moulds, Principal, Mindflow Design, Manufacturing Specialist

Randy Meirowltz, Ph.D., Mindflow Designs, Manufacturing Specialist (Surface Properties)

Richard Warpack, Prinicpal, Modern Concepts, Inc.

Manufacturing Specialist (Compounder Specialist, Rubber & Plastic)

Page C-1


Warne Hall (Tracey), Manager, Momentum Technologies International, Inc.

Testing Personnel (Product Development Manager)

Cynthia Campbell, Manage Lab, Momentum Technologies International, Inc.

Testing Personnel (Specializes in Asphalt Paving)

Robert Nieminen, P.E., Principal, NEMO ETC, LLC

Manufacturing Specialist (Building Envelope, Roofing Systems)

Zachary Robert Priest, P.E., Director, PRI Construction Materials Technologies, LLC

Testing Personnel

Mary Sikora, Principal, Recycling Research Institute, Manufacturing Specialist (Research)

Randy Russell, Owner, RWR Strategies, Project Coordinator

Yiwen Bu, Ph.D., LEED, AP, Twining, Testing Personnel

Sebally, Ph.D., P.E., Director & Professor, University of Nevada-Reno, Manufacturing Specialist

Bruce &Yvonne Wilson, Wilson Business Integrators (DBA The Wilson Group)

SB(Micro)/DVBE Administrative Support, Project Accounting

Brent Pickett, Ph.D, Western Fire Specialist, Testing Personnel

Page C-22

APPENDIX D: SAMPLES OF WRITTEN WORKAttached to this proposal are three copies each of the following work samples:

The Outlook for Crumb Rubber Feedstock Conversion, September 2013. Prepared by Ed Boisson and Denise Kennedy for Leidos Engineering, LLC under the 3rdCalRecycle Tire-Derived Product Business Assistance Program. This report summarizes assistance services primarily provided by or directed by Denise Kennedy, with task coordination by Randy Russell and overall project management by Ed Boisson.

Best Management Practices for Tire-Derived Product Development, September 2013. Prepared by Denise Kennedy with support by Chris Scoville. This report describes the application of quality assurance and quality control procedures in the TDP arena, with a focus on developing standards for TDPs.

TBAP Grants Contract Final Report, September 2013. Prepared by Ed Boisson and Randy Russell, this report summarizes the provision of over $2.4 million in services to 22 firms, including 10 feedstock conversion firms. The Leidos prime contractor team was managed by Ed Boisson with service tasks coordinated by Randy Russell and feedstock conversion technical, marketing and assistance services directed primarily by Denise Kennedy. All of the subcontractors proposed under this FCS contract also participated in the TBAP grants contract described in this report.

Page D-1

f01.justanswer.com€¦ · web viewsection 5 qualifications and resources. section 1 summary....

Documents