f ormation and e volution of the c herry -p it s tructure in b inary i mmiscible a lloy u nder i on...

19
FORMATION AND EVOLUTION OF THE CHERRY-PIT STRUCTURE IN BINARY IMMISCIBLE ALLOY UNDER ION IRRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

Upload: marcus-stevenson

Post on 24-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

FORMATION AND EVOLUTION OF THE CHERRY-PIT STRUCTUREIN BINARY IMMISCIBLE ALLOY UNDER ION IRRADIATION

Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey

5.12.2011

Page 2: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

EXPERIMENT OBSERVATION

Fig.2 A 1-nm thick layer of atoms from the high-dose sample at 350°C in the same x-y cut plane. Fe atoms (blue) have been minimized to make the Cu atoms (red) located inside of the large Fe precipitate more visible.

Fig.1 A Cu-V tip that was pre-irradiated at RT to a dose of 5x1015 /cm2, then irradiated at 450°C an additional dose of 3x1016 /cm2.

Figures courtesy of B. Stumphy.

Page 3: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

CU-FE PHASE DIAGRAM

Fig.3 Generally at low and medium temperatures, the solubility of Fe in Cu is larger than that of Cu in Fe.

The Cu-Fe phase diagram is asymmetric.

This work aims to address how the asymmetry of the phase diagram affects the microstructure and its evolution, under ion irradiation.

Page 4: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

CONSTRUCTION OF ASYMMETRIC PD

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

GC left side GC right side min GC right side max MFA PD

T(e

V)

CB

Fig.5 Phase diagram constructed by MFA and GC calculation

Fig.4 Δμ plot, by simulation started

from pure A (red) and Pure B (blue)

W=0.0553eV, εAAA =0, εAAB =0.005eV, εABB =-0.005eV, εBBB=0.

Page 5: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

BF=0.3 BF=0.5 BF=0.9 BF=3.0

BF=0.3 BF=0.5 BF=0.9 BF=3.0BF=0.3

BF=0.3

CHERRY-PIT ON BOTH SIDES?

T=0.036eV, W=0.0553eV, εAAA =0, εAAB =0.005eV, εABB =-0.005eV, εBBB=0.

Page 6: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

REGIME TEST

For the A85B15 alloy, Cherry-pit structures are found in the macroscopic growth regime, confirming Brad’s experiment.

In addition, for a alloy with asymmetric phase diagram, system could be in different regimeson different side of PD.

0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

S(k

)

k

BF=3,init_r BF=3,init_B BF=7,init_r BF=7,init_B

0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

S(k

)

k

BF=3, init_B BF=3, init_r BF=7, init_B BF=7, init_r

A85B15 S(k)-k plot, T=0.036eV

A15B85 S(k)-k plot, T=0.036eV

Dynamic phase diagram of A50B50 alloyfor symmetric phase diagram

Page 7: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

SIMULATION OBSERVATION

CherryandPit…

CherrywithoutPit…

Grow and Burst Cycle

Page 8: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

GAMMA IS SMALL: NO GROW AND BURST CYCLE

0 100 200 300 400 500

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

clu

ste

r si

ze

iteration

B cluster A cluster contained by B A+B cluster

Gamma = 0.1

0 100 200 300 400 500

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

A c

lust

er s

ize

iteration

A cluster size

Dynamic phase diagram of A50B50 alloyfor symmetric phase diagram

Page 9: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

TYPICAL GROW AND BURST CYCLE

0 100 200 300 400 500

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

clu

ste

r si

ze

iteration

B cluster A cluster contained by B A+B cluster

Gamma=1

We observe grow and burst cycle.

Page 10: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

NUCLEATION AND “CENTERING”

A85B15, Gamma=1, 300-400 iteration. Shown are the two largest B precipitate.

Picked from the 0.005 asymmetry simulation.

Page 11: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

DOES PIT MOBILITY MATTERS?

There could be two possible mechanisms that can lead to the bursting event of “cherry-pit” structure.

First, pit cluster can move to touch the cherry boundary.

Second, the fluctuation of the cherry sphere can also cause the burst.

We will look into the first possible reason.

Here we only consider the pairwise interaction between atoms,thus the phase diagram is symmetric.

Two sets of parameters are used to produce configurations withor without cherry-pit structures.

Page 12: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

CLUSTER MOBILITY --PIT MOBILITY

The mobility of cluster of a certain sizedrops significantly in the cherry-pit forming case. The four cluster size are1, 110, 220, 770, approximately.

These data are obtained from the pairwise interactiononly situation.

The B cohesive energy playsan important role.

If we set EBB = -4.340eV, andGamma = 3, there are cherry-pits.

If we set EBB = -4.174eV, andGamma = 100, there are no cherry-pits.

Page 13: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

THERMAL ANNEALING AFTER INJECTION OF MATRIX ATOMS

Cherry-pit forming case. No cherry-pit forming case.

The right side movie is actually 2000 times faster than it seems to be.

It seems that, even when the pit is small enough, it lose atom from single atom movement, not by touching the boundary of the cherry as a cluster.

Both simulations begin from a well supersaturated injection of matrix atoms.

Page 14: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

LET’S MAKE UP A STORY, SHALL WE?

“Cherry-pits” on both sides of phase diagram:

If “cherry-pit" structure is presenting on one side of the phase diagram, it should also be observed on the other side, but with different Γb value.

Different regimes of dynamical phase diagram:

On different sides of the phase diagram, with the same simulation parameters, the system can be in different region of the dynamical phase diagram.

Page 15: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

LET’S MAKE UP A STORY, SHALL WE?

Formation of the cherry-pit structure:

First, we need a source of the matrix atoms. -Ballistic exchange gives the source.

Second, the concentration of matrix atom in the Cherry should be highenough to nucleate a stable pit.-Gibbs-Thomson effect matters.-Mobility of small clusters matters (actually, single atom).

Growing of the pit:

Once a stable nucleation forms, injected matrix atoms can be absorbed by the pit.-Possible “centering” phenomenon of the pit.

Page 16: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

LET’S MAKE UP A STORY, SHALL WE?

Bursting of the cherry-pit structure:

One may be convinced by both the movie and the cluster mobility plot, that the bursting of the cherry-pit structure should be a result of the shape fluctuation of the cherry sphere.

In addition, a stable “grow and burst” cycle need the cherry to be large enough.

Page 17: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

Page 18: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

GIBBS-THOMSON EFFECTA practical effect of Gibbs-Thomson effect is that the solubilityof β depend on the particle size.

Xr and X∞ are the solubility with a particle radius r and infinity (flat interface).

γ is the surface energy (we use 100 surface to estimate it).

Vm is the molar volume of the phase.

We use the ordering energy of 0.0553eV, T = 0.0408eV, lattice constant a = 0.361nm, to make a estimate.

From the GC simulation, X∞ is about 10 at T = 0.0408eV.For a cluster of about 60 atom, r is about 0.55nm, giving a solubility of 60 atoms. (In the simulation, a cluster o 87 atoms actually dissolves completely.)

Page 19: F ORMATION AND E VOLUTION OF THE C HERRY -P IT S TRUCTURE IN B INARY I MMISCIBLE A LLOY U NDER I ON I RRADIATION Shipeng Shu, Kenneth Tussey 5.12.2011

MEASURING THE MOBILITY (1 ATOM WITH BALLISTIC JUMPS)

100 100000 1E8 1E11

1E-15

1E-14

1E-13

1E-12

1E-11

1E-10

1E-9

1E-8

1E-7

1E-6

1E-5

1E-4

1E-3

D(n

m2/s

)

time(s)

1_atom_no_cherry_AinB_ball 1_atom_no_cherry_AinB 100_atom_no_cherry_AinB 220_atom_no_cherry_AinB 772_atom_no_cherry_AinB 1_atom_cherry_ballistic 1_atom_cherry 107_atom_cherry 220_atom_cherry 773_atom_cherry