extensive reading is good for you - tesol · the)reading)skillshould)be)devoted)to)extensive)...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Extensive Reading is Good for you
Why don’t L2 learners of English do more of it?
Gillian Claridge International Pacific College, Palmerston North,
New Zealand
English as a means of communication: ‘In a world where ‘econo-‐technical superiority is what counts ….English makes the world go round.’ (Fishman 1992 p 23)
The internet reflects a largely English-‐dominated cyberculture (Rattle 2010 p 46)
Use of the internet is predicated on literacy
Gillian Claridge, 2
The need to read in English
The more proficient English learners are at reading, the more control they have over the Anglophone environment
But proficiency in reading is not just basic decoding. Proficiency means fluency. Fluency can only be gained by practice. Practice means extensive reading.
Gillian Claridge, 3
Reading brings empowerment
Many reading experts agree on the virtues of extensive reading: (Nuttall 1996 p 128; Day & Bamford, 1998, p 5; Nation 1997; Takase 2007).
Nation and Wang (1993) recommend at least one Graded Reader a week to increase vocabulary
Extensive reading is also called pleasure reading
Gillian Claridge, 4
Extensive Reading
It appears that learners of English do very little extensive reading (Day & Bamford 1998, Hill 2008, Grabe 2009, Renandya 2007, Macalister 2010, evidence from a tertiary college in NZ).
But if it’s a pleasure, and if it’s good for you…
WHY NOT?
Gillian Claridge, 5
Who does it?
For information: product reading For experience: process reading Process reading can be subdivided into reading for excitement, or reading for relaxation: an upper or a downer.
Nell (1998 p 225) describes pleasure or ‘ludic’ reading as ‘an altered state of consciousness, similar to dreaming or drug induced states.
Gillian Claridge, 6
Reasons for reading
2
1. Reading ability 2. Positive expectations 3. Correct choice of book 7. These antecedents are inter related. 8. They can be applied to L2 readers 9. Their relationship can be explained within the
framework of Rosenblatt’s (1986) Transactional Theory of Reading Response.
Gillian Claridge, 7
Nell’s 3 antecedents to pleasure reading
One text can be read for many purposes. The purpose dictates the reader’s ‘stance’. The ‘stance’ can be situated along a continuum from ‘aesthetic’, or pleasure, to ‘efferent’, or information.
If the initial purpose is not appropriate to the choice of text, the stance may have to change.
Gillian Claridge, 8
Rosenblatt’s Transactional Theory of Reading Response
Pleasure reading should be an enjoyable experience Therefore pleasure reading should be done primarily for the process, (aesthetic stance) not the product (efferent stance).
Therefore it should be almost effortless (Nell)…. …It should be easy.
Gillian Claridge, 9
L2 learner readers’ problems with choice
L2 learner readers tend to read texts that are too difficult to be ‘pleasure’ reading, and this is de-‐motivating: maybe that’s why they don’t do it very much.
Gillian Claridge, 10
Hypothesis
1. How much reading and what type of reading did a group of learners do?
2. What were their attitudes towards reading? 3. What factors made the learners enjoy reading? 4. What factors prevented them from enjoying
reading? 5. Were they reading texts above their language
proficiency level?
Gillian Claridge, 11
Research Questions
39 learners of English at a tertiary college in New Zealand
One year Foundation English: 25 hours language per week
Second year beginning Degree or Diploma programmes: 4 hours language per week
Gillian Claridge, 12
Background of the Study
3
Different methodologies were employed to answer the questions.
For clarity, each question has been itemised with the appropriate methodology and results.
Gillian Claridge, 13
Methodology and results Question 1: How much reading?
Gillian Claridge, 14
Methodology: Library records were analysed by number of fiction and
non-‐fiction books borrowed. Results 1. Borrowings decreased over the 5 terms. 2. Ratio of fiction to non fiction changed. 3. Consistently fewer books read than recommended
rate of 1 Graded Reader per week.
Gillian Claridge, 15
Borrowings of Fiction, Non-Fiction and Own Language
0
100
200
300
Term
Nu
mb
er
of
bo
rro
win
gs
FictionNon FictionOwn Language
Fiction 218 163 27 25 35
Non Fiction 117 173 91 75 46
Own Language 23 23 36 17 11
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
Methodology: A likert scale survey was conducted on the 39 learners. 6
questions were asked in each of the following categories: 1) reading in their own language, 2) reading in English and
3) reading in college. The most positive attitude is represented by 24 points in each
category, and the most negative by 6 points. Result: Attitudes were neither very positive nor very
negative, and did not change much over the 5 terms
Gillian Claridge, 16
Question 2: General attitude towards reading
Gillian Claridge, 17
Ap
pendix 3a: Q
uestionnaire
Reading Attitude scores
Gillian Claridge, 18
AVERAGE SURVEY SCORES N39
-1
4
9
14
19
24
SURVEY 1 SURVEY 2
Reading type
Sco
re /
24 Own langEnglishCollege
4
The 39 respondents were asked to answer the following questions, in English or their own language:
1. When you choose a particular book, what makes you enjoy it?
2. When you enjoy reading a book, what do you enjoy about it?
3. When you don’t enjoy reading a book, what don’t you enjoy about it?
Gillian Claridge, 19
Which factors make reading enjoyable or not?
Gillian Claridge, 20
Impressionistic view of factors suggests: Interest and content for enjoyment Difficulty, not interesting, story and (lack of ) understanding preventing enjoyment
Gillian Claridge, 21
Which factors make reading enjoyable or not? 2
Methodology: The Common European Framework used as a benchmark
Library records in process of being tagged with the publishers’ assessment of their CEFR level
Case studies from the group interviewed to provide rich data
Learners’ TOEIC scores for each term interpreted according to their CEFR level as per the English Testing Service (www.ets.org)
Gillian Claridge, 22
Question 5: Were the readers reading above their level of proficiency?
CEFR level A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2TOEIC reading 60-115 116-275 276-385 386-455 456-495 495
Oxford BookwormsStarter Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 5 Stage 6
Stage 4Cambridge ReadersLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6Penguin Readers Level 1 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6Macmillan Readers Starter Elementary Pre Int Intermed Upper Int
Beginner
Gillian Claridge, 23
CEFR equivalents
This analysis is incomplete at the time of writing, because the data input is not finished.
Therefore, to indicate a trend, the results of three of the case studies whose data sets were complete are presented below.
Gillian Claridge, 24
Library borrowings
5
Student 24: Sally Level: Began at A2, went down to A1 in Term 2 81 borrowings: 73 above current level, 2 at the same level.
But according to interviews, read very little after Term 1, and always read very slowly. Extracted information from books, did not usually finish reading.
Stance: always efferent: fact magpie, little information processing. She had to adopt this stance, as the texts were too hard to read aesthetically.
Choice: mostly Junior Non Fiction (B2) Attitude: started at 52 out of 72; decreased to 47
Gillian Claridge, 25
Case Study 1: Sally
Student 22: Annie Level in Term 1 was A1, marginally achieved A2 by Term 5 Borrowings: Out of 32, 23 above her proficiency level, 8 at her level,
1 below. Read slowly and unwillingly Stance: Efferent; like Sally she had to adopt this stance, as the texts
were too hard to read aesthetically. Chose in hope of enjoyment Choice: Humorous texts Attitude: Started at 36 out of a possible total of 72, and ended with
35
Gillian Claridge, 26
Case Study 2: Annie
Student 21: Suzie Level: proceeded smoothly from A1 to A2 Borrowings: out of 28, 6 are above her proficiency level, 2
are the same, and 20 are below. According to interviews, enjoyed reading
Stance: aesthetic. She was able to read easily because in the main, she chose books below her level
Choice: love stories, intrigue, ghost stories, books ‘that make me happy.’
Attitude: This started at 52 out of a possible 72, and ended at 69.
Gillian Claridge, 27
Case Study 3: Suzie On average,the group of 39 learners displayed a fairly neutral attitude to reading
The decrease in reading over the 5 terms may be accounted for by:
Ø No extensive reading classes after Term 2
Ø Other commitments: essay writing etc
Ø Perceived difficulty of texts
Gillian Claridge, 28
Discussion: the group
Suzie, the only reader who usually chose below her level, adopted the appropriate reading stance for pleasure reading; She expected it to be effortless and engaging, so chose accordingly. She read a lot in her first two terms and for her it was a pleasure. Her reading attitude summed up in her words:
‘When I read I can forget even time.’ Sally initially believed that reading was good for her, and
borrowed many books. But she almost never chose at or below her level, got discouraged by the difficulty, and read very little after Term 1. She never forgot ‘time’ when reading. When asked in Term 2 if reading helped her English, she replied, ‘No. Learn vocabulary help English.’
Gillian Claridge, 29
Discussion: the case studies 1
Annie: She admitted that she had never been interested in reading, even in her native language.
Her stance reinforced her opinion: she did choose humorous books that she thought she might enjoy, but she never enjoyed them, because she always read above her level.
Gillian Claridge, 30
Discussion: The Case Studies 2
6
If Extensive Reading is not taught in class, it is unlikely to be done.
If Extensive Reading is presented as pleasure reading, but is too hard, it is unlikely to be done very much.
The case study who adopted an appropriate reading stance maintained a positive attitude to reading, because her reading experience was what she had expected.
The case studies who did not adopt an appropriate stance for their levels, never found that pleasure reading was a pleasure. Their reading experiences were at odds with their expectations, because they were always trying to read something that was too hard for them, so they did not enjoy it.
Gillian Claridge, 31
Conclusion
Readers should be encouraged to make strategic extensive reading choices according to their ability: they should choose BELOW their language proficiency level: I -‐ 1
The ratio of extensive reading to intensive reading in class time should be equalised, particularly on Foundation English programmes. In the context of Nation’s Four Strands proposal for ESOL teaching, half the total time allocated to the Reading skill should be devoted to extensive reading.
Gillian Claridge, 32
Recommendations
Any questions?
Gillian Claridge, 33 Gillian Claridge, 34
References
Claridge, G. (2011). What makes a good graded reader : engaging with graded readers in the context of extensive reading in L2 Department of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. Wellington, Victoria. Crystal, D. (2005). How Language Works. London, Penguin Books, Allen Lane. Day, R. and J. Bamford (2002). "Top Ten Principles for Teaching Extensive Reading." Reading in a Foreign Language 14(2). Fishman, J. A. (1992). Sociology of English as an Additional Language. The Other Tongue: English across cultures. B. Kachru. Illinois, US, Urbana: 19 - 26. Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Hill, D. (2008). "Survey Review of Graded Readers in English." ELT Journal 62(2): 184-204. Macalister, J. (2010). "Investigating Teacher Attitudes to Extensive Reading Practices in HIgher Education: Why isn't Everyone Doing It?" RELC Journal 41(1): 59-75. Nation, I. S. P. and A. Heatley (1996). RANGE programme. I.S.P.Nation. Wellington, LALS Victoria University of Wellington Nation, P. and K. M.-T. Wang (1999). "Graded Readers and Vocabulary." Reading in a Foreign Language 12(2): 355-380. Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a Book. New Haven & London, Yale University Press. Nell, V. (1988). "The Psychology of Reading for Pleasure: Needs and Gratifications." International Reading Association 23(1 (Winter, 1988),): 6-50. R.Day and J.Bamford (1998). Extensive Reading in the Second Language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Rattle, R. (2010). Computing our way to Paradise: the role of internet and communication technologies in sustainable consumption and globalization. Lanham, Maryland US, Altamira Press A division of Rowlman and Littlefield Publishers Inc
Thank you for listening!
Gillian Claridge, 35