exploring polymorphism in molecular compounds using high ... · • molecular organic materials,...
TRANSCRIPT
High-Pressure Crystallography
Francesca P. A. Fabbiani Emmy-Noether Jr. Research Group
• Introduction to high-pressure research
• Experimental setup
• Collecting high-pressure data, solving and refining structures
• Molecular organic materials, single crystals
Welcome
Part 1
Part 2 Dr. Francesca P. A. Fabbiani High-pressure crystallography with
emphasis on single-crystal X-ray structure determination High-pressure crystallization Solid-state polymorphism Molecular compounds with
emphasis on pharmaceuticals and biomolecules
Dr. Michael Ruf Product Manager, SC-XRD Madison, WI, USA
Introduction to High-Pressure Research
• Planetary science and physics (e.g.
minerals, perovskites, clathrates, ices – N.B. 15 polymorphs of H2O to date!)
• Synthesis of novel materials (e.g. superhard materials, nanoporous materials, MOFs)
• Chemistry/molecular compounds (e.g. amino acids, molecular magnets, pharmaceuticals)
• Proteins, pressure-induced denaturation, folding
High-Pressure Research
Mao H , Hemley R J PNAS 2007;104:9114-9115 ©2007 by National Academy of Sciences
Range of pressures and temperatures now accessible with static compression techniques in the laboratory.
Source: Martin Chaplin, http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/phase.html
Phase diagram of water
• Industrial applications, e.g. pressure treatment of food
• Origin of life/ sustained life at the bottom of the oceans
• Access new materials, probe intermolecular interactions
• Understand polymorphic transformations
• Interplay with theory
High-Pressure Research
Source: Wikimedia Commons
Source: Wikimedia Commons
Cubic BN
Beta sheet
Paracetamol
Source: Wikimedia Commons
(1000 atmospheres ≈ 1 kbar = 100 MPa = 0.1 GPa)
GPa
Non-equilibrium pressure of H2
gas in intergalactic
space
104 103 10 10-1 10-2 10-16 10-36 108 1 Earth
atmosphere at altitude of 300
miles
Sea level
Centre of the Sun
Centre of the Earth
Centre of Jupiter
Pressure inside a light
bulb
Ice skater standing
on ice
Peak pressure of fist on concrete
during karate strike
Greatest depth in oceans
Graphite becomes diamond
Hydrogen becomes metallic
10-5 10-4 102
Molecular materials
High-Pressure Scale
Orders of magnitude available for pressure variation >> temperature variation
Experimental Setup
1958
Pressure Generation for in situ XRD: Diamond-Anvil Cell
First diamond anvil cell at NIST Gaithersburg Museum
Source: G. J. Piermarini, Wikimedia Commons
DAC manufactured by Dr. H. Ahsbahs
F. P. A. Fabbiani et al. CrystEngComm (2010), 12, 2354-2360
5 cm
2009 Aluminium DAC mounted on a goniometer head
P= F/A (kgms-2/m2 = N/m-2 = Pa)
Choose your DAC carefully: backing plates material, diamond cut, purity and culet size, gasket hole size, DAC opening angle
Pressure Generation for in situ XRD: Diamond-Anvil Cell
Tightening screws
Backing plate
Diamond Diamond
Gasket
F
F
A
Diamond
Ruby
Sample
• Prepare gasket, i.e. sample chamber
• Load sample together with pressure calibrant, e.g. ruby chip (fluorescence) or quartz single crystal (diffraction)
• Sample can be in the solid (direct compression in an hydrostatic medium), liquid or gas phase (in situ crystal growth). A solution can also be loaded for in situ crystal growth
• EDM machine (spark eroder) or laser to drill gasket hole
• Stereomicroscope with good magnification, large working distance and polariser/analyser
• Small spectrometer with large working distance to monitor ruby fluorescence if using ruby as pressure calibrant
Equipment for DAC preparation
DAC Loading
Three main sample loading methods available
Sample loading methods depend on:
• Nature of the sample under investigation
• Aim of experimental investigation
“Fathers” of high-pressure research: G. H. J. A. Tammann (1861-1938), P. W. Bridgman (1882-1961)
DAC Loading
300 µm 300 µm
The focus here is on molecular organic materials for single-crystal X-ray diffraction
Approach 1: Direct compression in a hydrostatic medium
• Good for studying polymorphism in small molecules
• Less effective for studying polymorphism in larger and/or rigid molecules: kinetic barrier associated with molecular rearrangement is usually large
• Good for studying evolution of structure as a function of pressure, for obtaining p-T phase diagrams and isothermal equation of states
• Choice of hydrostatic medium: solubility/ freezing pressure considerations
DAC Loading
DAC Loading
p
T
S L
V
Approach 2: In situ crystallisation and growing from the melt
• Excellent method for crystallising new polymorphs of compounds with melting points < 40°C and for comparing with low-temperature structures
• Not effective for higher melting organic compounds, which can decompose before the onset of melting
DAC Loading
Approach 2: In situ crystallisation and growing from the melt
heat
cool
Approach 3: In situ crystallisation from solution
• Excellent method for crystallising new polymorphs and solvates. No limitation to low melting point or small molecules
• Can vary solvent, pressure, temperature and concentration
• Prerequisite: relatively high solubility of the solute; solubility of solute increases with increasing temperature and decreases with increasing pressure
DAC Loading
• Introduction to high-pressure research
• Experimental setup
• Collecting high-pressure data, solving and refining structures
Outline
Part 1
Part 2
Molecular organic materials, single crystals
Collecting high-pressure data, solving and refining
structures
• Centre on the diffractometer, 2-step procedure: optical centring and direct beam centring (Dawson et al. 2004) or diffractometric measurements (King & Finger 1979, Dera & Katrusiak 1999)
• Choose suitable data collection strategy (and wavelength, if applicable) and exposure time; maximise no. frames per run (this helps during data integration if integrating with Bruker software)
Data collection in transmission mode
Data Collection
~ 144 mm Short collimator and long beamstop
Set up @ GZG Göttingen
A. Dawson et al. J. Appl. Cryst. (2004), 37, 410-416
H. E. King & L. W. Finger J. Appl. Cryst. (1979), 12, 374-378
P. Dera & A. Katrusiak J. Appl. Cryst. (1999), 32, 510-515
2θ
Incident beam I
Diffracted beam D ΨD
Collimator Axis of symmetry
Data Collection
Steel support of the DAC starting to obscure the detector
ω
For one orientation of the DAC, the accessible region of reciprocal space is determined by the detector distance and the DAC opening angle
By a combination of ω-scans using different orientations of the DAC in φ, and different orientations of the detector in 2θ, about ⅓ of all reflections can be collected (Angel et al. 1992). This can be increased by collecting more data with a different orientation of the DAC with respect to χ (see later)
R. J. Angel et al. Phase Transitions (1992), 39, 13-32
Data Collection Example of data collection strategy for a 3-circle diffractometer, detector distance = 7 cm and DAC perpendicular to the beam @ phi = 0°, ½ DAC opening angle = 45°
Scan Type 2 Theta Omega Phi Sweep Scan direction Omega -28 -40 0 30 +ve
Omega 28 40 0 65 -ve
Omega -28 -220 0 65 +ve
Omega 28 -140 0 30 -ve
Omega -28 -40 180 30 +ve
Omega 28 40 180 65 -ve
Omega -28 -220 180 65 +ve
Omega 28 -140 180 30 -ve
Phi 0 0 60 60 +ve
Phi 0 180 60 60 +ve
Phi 0 0 150 60 +ve
Phi 0 180 150 60 +ve
Important: check hardware limits; check diffraction limits and adjust 2 Theta and Omega accordingly
Set up @ GZG Göttingen
Data Collection
structure solution
data collection
data processing
structure refinement
Absorption and shadowing
Limited sampling of reciprocal space data completeness and resolution
Sample scattering power (and size)
Background
X-ray Crystallography
2θ
Incident beam I
Diffracted beam D ΨD
Collimator Axis of symmetry
Coverage of reciprocal space
Data Completeness
• Rotation of the DAC
• DAC with large opening angle + non-diffracting backing plates
• Data collection with short-wavelength radiation (see later)
• Careful orientation of the crystal in the DAC (ambient p)
• Multiple or twinned crystals
F. P. A. Fabbiani et al. CrystEngComm (2010), 12, 2354-2360
Increasing Data Completeness
Rotate by 120° and collect
Rotate by 120° and collect Collect
On a 3-circle diffractometer
• Data indexing identify reflections arising from sample
Data Processing
If large background variations, reduce the number of images and runs
Choose an appropriate value
It is useful to exclude certain regions, e.g. Be rings, gasket rings; if sample reflections are scarce and indexing is difficult, try omitting high-resolution regions, where diamond reflections are more abundant. This can also be achieved through a reciprocal lattice viewer (recommended)
Harvesting reflections
• Data indexing identify reflections arising from sample
Data Processing
The reciprocal lattice viewer is an invaluable tool for indexing, for assessing data quality and for twin-spotting. Reflections can be conveniently assigned to different groups and exported for indexing with external programs, e.g. CELL_NOW
Reciprocal lattice viewer
• Data indexing identify reflections arising from sample
• Data integration mask out regions of detector obscured by the DAC; choose appropriate resolution; background correction
Data Processing
The following are recommendations based on personal experience. There is no “one-fits-all” strategy that will work for every sample: try different options to optimise your integration.
Once the integration parameters have been optimised, I would strongly recommend performing successive integration cycles (“UB matrix update”) for best intensities and unit cell parameters
• Data indexing identify reflections arising from sample
• Data integration mask out regions of detector obscured by the DAC; choose appropriate resolution; background correction
Data Processing
Twins can be easily handled
Try to keep the box size small. If problems with convergence: uncheck this option
If background is jumpy choose high frequency; otherwise reduce
• Data indexing identify reflections arising from sample
• Data integration mask out regions of detector obscured by the DAC; choose appropriate resolution; background correction
Data Processing
Threshold for strong reflections: lower this to, e.g. 8 for weak data
This option might be useful for synchrotron data
For using dynamic masks generated with an external program
Typical frames from CCD Area Detector
Dynamic masks: A. Dawson et al. J. Appl. Cryst. (2004), 37, 410–416; N. Casati et al. J. Appl. Cryst. (2004), 40, 620-630
Powder ring from Beryllium
backing discs (now almost
obsolete)
Powder ring from steel gasket
almost invisible at 2θ = 0 (gasket and
beam size dependent)
Shading from DAC opening
angle
Diamond reflection
Dynamic mask for integration
Sample reflection
Data Processing
• Data indexing identify reflections arising from sample
• Data integration mask out regions of detector obscured by the DAC; choose appropriate resolution; background correction
Data Processing
Generate dynamic masks “on the fly”, e.g. with the Bruker SAINT integration software, V8.07A run from the command line (“Advanced options”)
Input DAC geometry
• Scaling and absorption correction 2-stage procedure: analytical correction for DAC components and gasket shadowing, see programs by S. Parsons, A. Katrusiak and R. J. Angel; multiscan correction to correct for other systematic errors and for scaling, e.g. SADABS. Beware of outliers, e.g. diamond reflections!
• Space group determination difficulty related to completeness, redundancy, resolution and crystal orientation systematic absences are not always present
Data Processing
• Data indexing identify reflections arising from sample
• Data integration mask out regions of detector obscured by the DAC; choose appropriate resolution; background correction
• Data merging crucial step; robust-resistant and experimental (1/σ2) weighting scheme with SORTAV
• Structure solution direct methods, global optimisation methods (borrowed from powder diffraction), molecular replacement, etc.: numerous programs available!
Data Processing
SORTAV: R. H. Blessing J. Appl. Cryst. (1995), 30, 421–426
Refinement
• Very high-quality high-pressure data can be collected nowadays. It is nevertheless important to be realistic during refinement. Refinement of ADPs for all non-H atoms might not be possible
• Most commonly encountered problem: low data to parameter ratio; restraints are your friends: treat them well and be generous
• Always investigate outliers before omitting reflections: go back to the original frames
• The following are examples taken from my own research
CRYSTALS: P. W. Betteridge et al. J. Appl. Cryst. (2003), 36, 1487
SHELXL: G. M. Sheldrick Acta Cryst. (2008), A64, 112-122
Example of problematic data, lab source In situ crystallisation study
Cell setting, space group Monoclinic, P21/n
a, b, c (Å) 7.630(2) 17.209(3) 7.3708(11)
β (°) 103.923(8)
Z 4
Multi-scan abs. correction Tmin/Tmax 0.29
No. of measured, independent and observed [F > 4σ(F)] reflections 801, 203, 172
Rint 0.05
No. of parameters 14
R1[F > 4σ(F)], wR2(F2, all reflections) 0.134, 0216
(sinθ/λ)max (Å-1) and completeness (%) 0.5, 24.4
Constraints: 2 rigid bodies 1 isotropic parameter
Refinement program: CRYSTALS
C9H13NO3 Structure solution: DASH
Refinement
Cell setting, space group Monoclinic, P21/c
a, b, c (Å) 8.9537(11) 5.4541(6) 13.610(4)
β (°) 104.93(2)
Z 4
Multi-scan abs. correction Tmin/Tmax 0.61
No. of measured, independent and observed [F > 4σ(F)] reflections 3718, 470, 359
Rint 0.08
No. of parameters and restraints 92, 83
R1[F > 4σ(F)], wR2(F2, all reflections) 0.053, 0.103
(sinθ/λ)max (Å-1) and completeness (%) 0.63, 34.4
300 µm
Single crystal
Tungsten gasket
Water solvent
Ruby chip
SIMU, DELU, DFIX [for (N)H positions] restraints
C6H10N2O2
Refinement program: CRYSTALS Structure solution: Sir92
Refinement
Example of good data, lab source In situ crystallisation study
Fo
Fc
Shaded reflections
Here would expect diamond overlaps
Overlap with gasket
300 µm
Single crystal
Tungsten gasket
Water solvent
Ruby chip
Refinement
Example of good data, lab source
Increasing data quality – Part I
• Brilliance gain in diffracted intensity compared to a lab source, i.e. increase in resolution and completeness
• Tuneable wavelength: short-wavelength radiation is accessible less absorption and significant gain in completeness
• Small source size: microfocussing is possible very small samples can be investigated; reduction/elimination of gasket diffraction
k
k′
d
2θ
θ 0
S
1/λ
θλ sin2dn =
Synchrotron radiation Useful properties of synchrotron radiation:
Cell setting, space group Triclinic, P-1
a, b, c (Å) 6.7906(12) 7.3159(4) 15.8428(14)
α, β, γ (°) 86.297(6) 78.924(11) 72.713(6)
Z 2
Multi-scan abs. correction Tmin/Tmax 0.63
No. of measured, independent and observed [F > 4σ(F)] reflections 6429, 1533, 1294
Rint 0.05
No. of parameters and restraints 172, 100
R1[F > 4σ(F)], wR2(F2, all reflections) 0.045, 0.130
(sinθ/λ)max (Å-1) and completeness (%) 0.62, 52
300 µm
C9H17NO2 . 7(H2O)
SIMU, DELU restraints
Refinement program: CRYSTALS Structure solution: Sir92
Refinement
All H-atoms could be located on difference Fourier maps
Example of good data, synchrotron radiation In situ crystallisation study
Cell setting, space group Orthorhombic, P212121
a, b, c (Å) 15.9455(4) 21.0511(5) 23.8739(8)
Z 4
Multi-scan abs. correction Tmin/Tmax 0.75
No. of measured, independent and observed [F > 4σ(F)] reflections 53048, 10032, 7534
Rint 0.05
No. of parameters and restraints 936, 168
R1[F > 4σ(F)], wR2(F2, all reflections) 0.066, 0.216
(sinθ/λ)max (Å-1) and completeness (%) 0.58, 80
300 µm
C63H88CoN14O14P . 22 H2O
SIMU, DELU, DFIX restraints
Refinement program: SHELXL Structure solution: (SHELXS)
High pressure (1.0 GPa)
Refinement
High pressure (1.0 GPa)
Example of good data on a large molecule, synchrotron radiation Compression study
Cell setting, space group Orthorhombic, P212121
a, b, c (Å) 15.8260(9) 22.4438(13) 25.4429(16)
Z 4
Multi-scan abs. correction Tmin/Tmax 0.88
No. of measured, independent and observed [F > 4σ(F)] reflections 101570, 26484, 19937
Rint 0.04
No. of parameters and restraints 917, 168
R1[F > 4σ(F)], wR2(F2, all reflections) 0.073, 0.225
(sinθ/λ)max (Å-1) and completeness (%) 0.72, 96
SIMU, DELU, DFIX restraints
Refinement program: SHELXL Structure solution: (SHELXS)
Ambient pressure
C63H88CoN14O14P . 23.5 H2O
Refinement
Ambient pressure
Example of good data on a large molecule, synchrotron radiation Ambient-pressure and temperature study
Water ordering in channels at high pressure
Electron density maps generated with shelXle, Fo-Fc @ 0.31 e-/Å3, Fo @ 0.98 e-/Å3
Ambient pressure High pressure (1.0 GPa)
Refinement
Example of good data on a large molecule, synchrotron radiation
ShelXle: C. B. Hübschle et al. J. Appl. Cryst. (2011), 44, 1281-1284
In the lab
• Ag radiation (0.56087 Å) is now available as an air-cooled 30 W microsource (supplier: Incoatec) increase in data completeness, “cleaner” background
k
k′
d
2θ
θ 0
S
1/λ
θλ sin2dn =
• Shorter wavelength less absorption, more diffraction data and smaller diffraction angles
Increasing data quality – Part II
Synchrotron radiation Useful properties of synchrotron radiation:
Ag radiation in the lab
• Comparative study on gabapentin heptahydrate, Incoatec Ag microsource vs. Mo sealed tube on a Bruker AXS Apex II diffractometer
Source Ag-IµS Mo-ST
Power/ kW 0.03 2.0
Exposure time (s/0.3°) 20 20
<I> 368.8 (64.9) 378.0 (61.0)
<I/σ> 19.6 (3.2) 18.3 (4.7)
Unique data 866 (170) 721 (135)
<Redundancy> 1.5 (0.9) 1.1 (0.7)
<Completeness>/% 40.6 (28.9) 33.7 (22.6)
Rint 0.0306 0.0342
R1 (I<2σ(I)) 0.0487 630 refl 0.0532 523 refl.
wR2 0.1025 860 refl. 0.232 705 refl.
Number in parenthesis refer to the highest resolution shell (1.00 – 0.90 Å)
Data statistics
Ag-IµS, 90 µm beam Mo-sealed tube, 500 µm beam
Fore more information: http://www.incoatec.de/?id=101
300 µm
Further Reading
Further Reading
Acknowledgments
• Prof. Simon Parsons (Edinburgh)
• Dr. Heidrun Sowa (Göttingen)
• Dr. Jürgen Graf (Incoatec)
• Dr. Michael Ruf (Bruker)
High-Pressure Crystallography
Funding
Question & Answer
• A PDF copy of the slides and a link to the recording of this webinar will be emailed to you.
• For more Bruker SC-XRD webinars, visit http://www.bruker-axs.com/ webinars_sc-xrd.html
Thank you for joining!
Questions?
• Type any questions you may have into the Q&A panel, then click Send.