exploring milwaukee public library partnership opportunities
DESCRIPTION
Exploring Milwaukee Public Library Partnership Opportunities. Prepared for the Milwaukee Public Library By: Peter Dermody Sarah Hurley Emily Reynolds Ted Schuster Soumary Vongrassamy Monica Wedgewood. Introduction. Background Problem Statement Potential Partners Methodology - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Exploring Milwaukee Public Library Partnership Opportunities
Prepared for the Milwaukee Public Library
By:Peter Dermody
Sarah HurleyEmily Reynolds
Ted SchusterSoumary VongrassamyMonica Wedgewood
Introduction
• Background• Problem Statement• Potential Partners• Methodology• Partnership Options• Evaluation• Recommendation
Problem Statement
MPL goals:• Broaden reach in the Milwaukee community• Attract the general mix of the City's
population• Respond to evolving constituent needs
Our report analyzes if and how academic library partnership can help MPL meet these goals.
Potential Partner Libraries
•University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM)
•Marquette University
•Milwaukee Area Technical College (MATC)
Methodology
Partnership Options:
1. Library card access2. Meeting space3. Courier service4. Searchable catalog5. Programming6. Satellite collections7. Joint-use library facility
Criteria:
• Realizing efficiency• Enhancing services• Expanding capacity• Willingness and
feasibility of potential partners
Programming Options
• Community Readso Events based on one book hosted across the
community by each partner
• Culturalo Partners coordinate community learning
opportunitieso Utilizing partner expertise and resources
Programming Options
• Service-Learning Programmingo Students volunteer in coordination with courses
• Public Health Literacy Programmingo Regularly scheduled drop-in sessions for
community members to access health information
• Librarian Training Programmingo UWM School of Information Studieso Children’s services, outreach, and branch services
Satellite Collection Option
• Small number of MPL's popular materials loaned to academic partners
• Academic partners house and maintain the loaned materials
• Provides MPL with an initial physical presence on the campuses
• Potential opportunity cost related to availability of materials
EvaluationMost Efficient for MPL (cost)• Service-Learning• Health Literacy• Satellite Collection
Best Enhances MPL Services• Community Reads• Cultural Programming
Best Expands MPL Capacity• Service-Learning• Health Literacy
Most MPL/Partner Interest• Cultural Programming• Service-Learning• Health Literacy
Most Feasible for MPL/Partner• Cultural Programming • Service-Learning• Health Literacy
Recommendations
1. Implement service-learning programming• Most feasible, increases services, limited
budgetary cost2. Implement community reads, public health literacy,
librarian training, and cultural programming as well• Moderate costs, would improve quality and
quantity of services MPL provides to community 3. Pursue satellite collection option after initial
partnership relationships are established • Feasibility for partners is low
Special Thanks
Paula Kiely and Joan Johnson, Milwaukee Public Library
Eric Pearson, City of Milwaukee Division of Budget and Management
Melissa Berger, Erika Cheng, Paco Fuchs, Emily Ley, and Lara Rosen
Professor Andrew Reschovsky
Karen Faster, La Follette School of Public Affairs
For further informationContact the La Follette School’s publications office at 608-263-7657 or [email protected]
Or see www.lafollette.wisc.edu/publications/workshops.html
Thank you
San Jose King Library (Joint-use facility)• Partnership between San Jose State University and the
city of San Jose
• $177 million facility that opened in 2003o Funding split 66.5% (SJSU) and 33.5% (City of San Jose)
• A marriage between each partner libraryo Separate staffs, material purchases, and budgetso Share access to space, material circulation, and personnel
resources
• Potential Challengeso Political environment, personnel and management alignment