exploring high-spin states in 39ar using a fusion-evaporation · exploring high-spin states in 39ar...

1
Exploring High - Spin States in 39 Ar using a Fusion - Evaporation Reaction B. Abromeit , S. L. Tabor, Vandana Tripathi , R. S. Lubna , K.Kravvaris , E. Rubino , A. Volya Motivation Theory Preliminary Analysis and Results The Future This material is based upon work supported by the U. S. National Science Foundation under Grants No. PHY 14-01574 and PHY 17- 12953. Supported in part by the Stewardship Science Academic Alliance through the Centaur Center of Excellence under Grant No. NA0003841. Acknowledgements References [1] R.Bass et al., Nuc Phys A Vol 95, Iss 1, 38-64 (1967) [2] A.Graue et al., Phys Norvegica 2, 137 (1967) [3] R.Bass et al., Nuc Phys A Vol 131, Iss 3, 673-678 (1969) [4] J.L.Wiza et al., Nuc Phys A Vol 183, Iss 2, 439-448 (1972) [5] S.Sen et al., Phys Rev C 5, 1278 (1972) [6] E.K.Warburton et al., Phys Rev C 13, 1762(R) (1976) [7] J.Keinonen et al., Z.Phys A282, 227 (1977) [8] William C. Corwin et al., Phys Rev C 15, 505 (1977) [9] H.Nann et al., Phys Rev C 15, 1959 (1977) [10] J.F.Tonn et al., Phys Rev C 16, 2065(R) (1977) [11] W.A.Sterrenburg et al., Nuc Phys A Vol 306, Iss 1-2,14-21, 157-172 (1978) [12] R.S.Lubna, FSU Shell Model Interaction – Private Communication Department of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA Further comparison and development of the FSU shell model interaction will be conducted in order to help predict the J π of the newly discovered states. Because of the nature of the reaction and the J π of the previously known transitions, it is suspected that these new states will have high spin. Fitting an interaction to these new states will help build an interaction that is applicable for other isotopes that might also have intruder states. John D. Fox Superconducting Linear Accelerator Laboratory Intruder States : Excited states that arise when particles cross a shell gap Standard shell model of 39 Ar in ground state To the left is the standard configuration of protons and neutrons in the ground state of 39 Ar. A state’s spin parity, J π , is determined by the coupling of protons, π, and neutrons, ν, in the various particle shells. Ground state comes from uncoupled neutron in 1f 7/2 shell J π of ground state of 39 Ar: 7/2 - 1s 1/2 1p 3/2 1p 1/2 2s 1/2 1d 5/2 1d 3/2 1f 7/2 2p 3/2 1f 5/2 2p 3/2 20 8 2 1s 1/2 1p 3/2 1p 1/2 2s 1/2 1d 5/2 1d 3/2 1f 7/2 2p 3/2 1f 5/2 2p 1/2 20 8 2 π ν 2 4 2 6 2 4 6 8 4 4 Standard shell model of 39 Ar in an excited state 1s 1/2 1p 3/2 1p 1/2 2s 1/2 1d 5/2 1d 3/2 1f 7/2 2p 3/2 1f 5/2 2p 3/2 20 8 2 1s 1/2 1p 3/2 1p 1/2 2s 1/2 1d 5/2 1d 3/2 1f 7/2 2p 3/2 1f 5/2 2p 1/2 20 8 2 π ν 2 4 2 6 2 4 6 8 4 4 J π of excited state: 17/2 + The new state created by promoting a 1d 3/2 proton into the 1f 7/2 shell gives a new energy level with a J π of 17/2 + . Importance: this state is an intruder state, which are useful when helping to adjust/create theory models that are applicable for all isotopes 14 C 14 C 27 Al 41 K Experimental Details : Ran for approximately 7 days using a Tandem Van de Graaff accelerator Used 14 C beam with an energy of 25.6 MeV Used self-supporting, 100 μg/cm 2 27 Al target Gamma Spectroscopy Array : Consisting of 3 Compton-suppressed HpGe clover detectors and 7 HpGe single crystal detectors at angles 90°, 35°, and 145° Utilized a particle telescope, made from two silicon detectors (100μm and 1000μm thicknesses), placed at 0° [1] Compound nucleus: 41 K Decay channel selected: proton-neutron A particle ID chart was created, as seen to the right, by taking the energy relationship between the E detector and dE detector in the particle telescope PID allows to select all events that occur with the decay through proton-neutron channel Total energy deposited in E detector Energy lost in dE detector After selecting events that occur in coincidence with the proton-neutron decay channel, a partial level scheme for 39 Ar could be created using gamma-gamma coincidences. Determining γ-γ Coincidences: Observe the gamma rays that are in coincidence with another gamma ray(s), taken from a specific cut on the data If in true coincidence, making a “reverse” cut on the new gamma ray will show the original gamma ray and possibly other gamma rays. If there is no evidence of the original gamma ray, the coincidence is a random coincidence . Below and above are a few examples of γ-γ coincidences that were used to build the level scheme Preliminary Partial level scheme of 39 Ar, depicting high-spin states [1-11] Legend : Black: Previously measured gamma transition Red: New gamma transition Blue: Contaminant Green: electron annihilation At FSU, we are in the process of developing a new interaction that will better predict intruder states for excitations across the n = 20 shell gap [12]. Above is the comparison of the FSU interaction predictions to the experimental results for 39 Ar. Legend : Red : negative parity theory states Blue : positive parity theory states p n α

Upload: others

Post on 28-Sep-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Exploring High-Spin States in 39Ar using a Fusion-Evaporation Reaction

B. Abromeit, S. L. Tabor, Vandana Tripathi, R. S. Lubna, K.Kravvaris, E. Rubino, A. Volya

Motivation

TheoryPreliminary Analysis and Results

The Future

This material is based upon work supported by the U. S. National Science Foundation under Grants No. PHY 14-01574 and PHY 17-12953. Supported in part by the Stewardship Science Academic Alliance through the Centaur Center of Excellence under Grant No. NA0003841.

AcknowledgementsReferences

[1] R.Bass et al., Nuc Phys A Vol 95, Iss 1, 38-64 (1967)

[2] A.Graue et al., Phys Norvegica 2, 137 (1967)

[3] R.Bass et al., Nuc Phys A Vol 131, Iss 3, 673-678 (1969)

[4] J.L.Wiza et al., Nuc Phys A Vol 183, Iss 2, 439-448 (1972)

[5] S.Sen et al., Phys Rev C 5, 1278 (1972)

[6] E.K.Warburton et al., Phys Rev C 13, 1762(R) (1976)

[7] J.Keinonen et al., Z.Phys A282, 227 (1977)

[8] William C. Corwin et al., Phys Rev C 15, 505 (1977)

[9] H.Nann et al., Phys Rev C 15, 1959 (1977)

[10] J.F.Tonn et al., Phys Rev C 16, 2065(R) (1977)

[11] W.A.Sterrenburg et al., Nuc Phys A Vol 306, Iss 1-2,14-21, 157-172 (1978)

[12] R.S.Lubna, FSU Shell Model Interaction – Private Communication

Department of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA

Further comparison and development of the FSU shell model interaction will be conducted in order to help predict the Jπ of the newly discovered states.

Because of the nature of the reaction and the Jπ of the previously known transitions, it is suspected that these new states will have high spin. Fitting an interaction to these new states will help build an interaction that is applicable for other isotopes that might also have intruder states.

John D. Fox Superconducting Linear Accelerator Laboratory

Intruder States: Excited states that arise when particles cross a shell

gap

Standard shell model of 39Ar in ground state

• To the left is the standard configuration of protons and neutrons in the ground state of 39Ar.

• A state’s spin parity, Jπ, is determined by the coupling of protons, π, and neutrons, ν, in

the various particle shells.

• Ground state comes from uncoupled neutron in 1f7/2 shell

Jπof ground state of 39Ar: 7/2-

1s1/2

1p3/2

1p1/2

2s1/2

1d5/2

1d3/2

1f7/2

2p3/2

1f5/2

2p3/2

20

8

21s1/2

1p3/2

1p1/2

2s1/2

1d5/2

1d3/2

1f7/2

2p3/2

1f5/2

2p1/2

20

8

2

π ν2

42

62

4

6

8

4

4

Standard shell model of 39Ar in an excited state

1s1/2

1p3/2

1p1/2

2s1/2

1d5/2

1d3/2

1f7/2

2p3/2

1f5/2

2p3/2

20

8

21s1/2

1p3/2

1p1/2

2s1/2

1d5/2

1d3/2

1f7/2

2p3/2

1f5/2

2p1/2

20

8

2

π ν2

42

62

4

6

8

4

4

Jπof excited state: 17/2+

• The new state created by promoting a 1d3/2 proton into the 1f7/2 shell gives a new energy level with a Jπof 17/2+.

• Importance: this state is an intruder state, which are useful when helping to adjust/create theory models that are applicable for all isotopes

14C 14C 27Al41K

Experimental Details: Ran for approximately 7 days using a

Tandem Van de Graaff accelerator

• Used 14C beam with an energy of 25.6 MeV

• Used self-supporting, 100 μg/cm2 27Al target

• Gamma Spectroscopy Array: Consisting of 3 Compton-suppressed HpGe clover detectors and 7 HpGe single crystal detectors at angles 90°, 35°, and 145°

• Utilized a particle telescope, made from two silicon detectors (100μm and 1000μm thicknesses), placed at 0° [1]

• Compound nucleus: 41K

• Decay channel selected: proton-neutron

A particle ID chart was created, as seen to the right, by taking the energy relationship between the E detector and dE detector in the particle telescope

• PID allows to select all events that occur with the decay through proton-neutron channel

Total energy deposited in E detector

Energ

y lost

in d

Edete

ctor

After selecting events that occur in coincidence with the proton-neutron decay channel, a partial level scheme for 39Ar could be created using gamma-gamma coincidences.

Determining γ-γ Coincidences:

• Observe the gamma rays that are in coincidence with another gamma ray(s), taken from a specific cut on the data

• If in true coincidence, making a “reverse” cut on the new gamma ray will show the original gamma ray and possibly other gamma rays.

• If there is no evidence of the original gamma ray, the coincidence is a random coincidence .

Below and above are a few examples of γ-γ coincidences that were used to build the level schemePreliminary

Partial level scheme of 39Ar, depicting high-spin states [1-11]

Legend:• Black: Previously measured gamma transition• Red: New gamma transition• Blue: Contaminant• Green: electron annihilation

At FSU, we are in the process of developing a new interaction that will better predict intruder states for excitations across the n = 20 shell gap [12]. Above is the comparison of the FSU interaction predictions to the experimental results for 39Ar.

Legend:• Red: negative parity theory states• Blue: positive parity theory states

p

n

α