exploring fulton as a charter system results of community ......purpose of today’s presentation...
TRANSCRIPT
Exploring Fulton as a Charter System
Results of Community Input
Board WorksessionJanuary 20, 2011
A five year contract between the school system and the state
Describes specific operational and instructional innovations and waivers from state law that will be implemented
Defines the common operational and instructional practices that will be in place for all schools
Details the performance that will be improved over the term of the contract
System Charter Description
System Charter Description
Defines the responsibilities of school principals, school governing boards, and the central administration in implementing plans to achieve performance improvements
The Charter System remains under the control and management of the local Board of Education
Waivers and innovations can be phased in over the 5-year charter period
System Charter Description
Current conversion charter schools may join the system charter if they wish
Start-up charters are unaffected by the System Charter status
Why a Charter System?
State law now requires all school systems to convert to an IE2 contract, a system charter contract, or state that they are satisfied with the current structure by June 2013
Charter System Development Process
First semester 2010-11
Determined parameters from Board of Education
• Options that add cost will be considered very cautiously
Held community forums with administrators, teachers and parents
Held input sessions with student groups
Created online forum for input on the website
Charter System Development Process
Purpose of today’s presentation
• Present input from the community to the Board of Education
Next Steps
• Board determines whether and when to pursue charter system status
Develop charter petition
Hold public hearings on charter content
Board votes on final charter petition
Board submits to Georgia Board of Education by November 1, 2011*
March 2012 – GABOE approves Charter System*
August 2012 –Charter System begins for 2012-13 school year*
* Could move a year later and still meet state timelines
Possible Charter System Development Timelines
Exploration Phase - Accomplishments
Hosted seven community forums across the school system in late October and early November
Over 90 Fulton system staff participated as facilitators, scribes, or in other supporting roles at forums
Visited an additional four middle and four high schools to engage students
Created dedicated website, used Twitter and Facebook to enhance electronic communication channels
Actively engage with Fulton’s parents,
teachers, administrators,
students, and the community
Enlist FCS Staff in process and outreach
Utilize new channels to build awareness
Exploration Phase
Accomplishments
9
Seven Forum Locations Across Fulton
October 18th Johns Creek HS
October 19th Westlake HS
October 27th Roswell HS
November 3rd Milton Center
November 4th Creekside HS
November 10th Tri-Cities HS
November 11th Riverwood InternationalCharter HS
10
Selected locations
Over 900 Attended Community Meetings at Locations Across Fulton
120 135 102
88
67
35
2168 5575
34
92
3217
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
20010
/18
John
s Cr
eek
10/1
9 W
estla
ke
10/2
7 Ro
swel
l
11/3
Inde
pend
ence
11/4
Cre
eksi
de
11/1
0 Tr
i-Citi
es
11/1
1 Ri
verw
ood
Parents
Staff
11
Online Presence Enhanced Community Outreach
Launched Exploring Fulton as a Charter System Website with updated content in early November• One-stop location for news and
updates
• Active online feedback option
• Links to related information
Received over 80 additional online comments and questions from the community• Included in our report
12
COMMUNITY FORUMSINITIAL FINDINGS
EXPLORING FULTON AS A CHARTER SYSTEM
Questions for Community Forums
Describe the ideal school for your student(s) in the areas of:
• Curriculum and instruction
• School culture
• Use of funds
• Hiring of teachers and administrators
• Monitoring results and accountability
Given the reality of current resources, which of these ideas do you think will most increase student achievement?
Prioritization of Input
COMMUNITY FORUM RECOMMENDATIONSSUPPORTED BY WAIVERS TO STATE LAW
Instruction that is Flexible, Relevant and Differentiated -general
17
Differentiated teaching strategies and methods
More autonomy in pacing, move on when ready
More levels of instruction
Instruction that is Flexible, Relevant and Differentiated – Upper Grade Levels
On-line, web-based
External, field experiences
Flexible “seat time” in classes, summer, evening, after-school
Student-selected, student- driven
Hands-on, interactive, application versus theory, problem-based
18
Expand foreign language
Expand music
Rigor and national standards
19
Broader Curriculum Options - general
New ways to earn course credit
Relevance between curriculum and classes
Vocational, career, life skills
Technology
Advanced Placement/college-level
Well-rounded, balanced with arts and athletics
20
Broader Curriculum Options – upper grade levels
Student-driven
Flexible sequencing
Vertical alignment with colleges and businesses
21
Broader Curriculum Options – Upper Grade Levels
Implement performance-based evaluation of teachers
• Student achievement, growth of students
• Not just test scores
• Student ratings
• Parent ratings
Personnel retention based upon performance, not years of service
Remove ineffective teachers more easily
Better support new teachers
22
Teacher Performance
Moderate support for performance-based pay
Some similar comments related to administrators and other staff
23
Teacher Performance - Continued
Local School Flexibility
Hiring and surplus decisions based upon local school criteria and selection
Staffing ratios
“Buy positions” based upon school needs
Flexible hours for certain positions based on school needs
Input from teachers and parents in how funds are spent
Cluster alignment
24
School culture
Increased, mandatory parent involvement and accountability
Allow required uniforms for students
25
COMMUNITY FORUM RECOMMENDATIONSNOT REQUIRING WAIVERS TO STATE LAW
Assessment
Value-added, growth measures
Local school flexibility on district assessments
Portfolios
More qualitative measures
Product-driven demonstration of mastery
Frequent, interim progress monitoring and reporting to parents
Results to parents and students in a timely manner
27
Technology
Online textbooks
Use to deliver instruction
Equitable
More
Integrated
Updated
28
Professional Development
Professionally-led by subject experts
School-based
For all staff
Collaborative planning
Continuous
29
Class Size
Reduce class size
30
School Calendar
Extended
Balanced
Year-round
31
STUDENT DISCUSSION GROUPSINITIAL FINDINGS
EXPLORING FULTON AS A CHARTER SYSTEM
Student Discussion Groups - Overview
Over 70 representative 8th and 9th graders participated in eight facilitated groups in early December
Two Fulton staff members experienced in focus group facilitation and analysis led the discussions
• Arthur Mills, Organizational Advancement
• Korynn Schooley, Assessment and Accountability
Included additional school clusters to those where forums were held
33
Eight Student Group Locations
December 1st Milton HS
December 2nd Renaissance MSLangston Hughes HS
December 7th Hopewell MS
December 8th McNair MS
December 9th Banneker HS
December 10th Centennial HSHolcomb Bridge MS
Selected clusters
34
Student Discussion Groups - Format
An open discussion with the students centered on these questions:
• How do you feel you learn best?
• What makes you enjoy your school learning experience?
• What could be improved?
• Which topics that we discussed did you feel the strongest
about?
Each group discussion lasted about an hour • One class period to reduce missed class-time
Local principals and staff selected a representative sample of students from their school
35
A Good Teacher Makes the Difference
“I learn best in interactive class settings with real-world relevant topics.”
“I feel the pace of work is often too
fast.”
“I appreciate the high expectations and freedoms I’m
provided by my teacher.”
“I want a good
teacher.”
“I like when I can personally
connect with my teacher and
know they care.”
36
How Did Students Define a Good Teacher?
37
Delivers engaging instruction
Effectively uses technology
Aligns class pace with students’ needs
Maintains a supportive and organized classroom culture
“I want a good
teacher.”
Engaging Instruction
Students recognize which teaching methods positively impact their individual learning
• Interactive work with teams
• Hands-on projects and labs
• Experiential learning coupled with basic lecture
“Interactive studies and labs are very helpful, when you see what happens.“
“I remember everything she [my teacher] says because she got on the chair and did a chant…and then did a song with all the prepositions. It was corny, but helpful!”
38
Effective Use of Technology
Students repeatedly mentioned a desire for more uses of technology to engage their class
• PowerPoint lectures and study aids
• Smartboards – especially in Math classes
• Outside learning materials that connect lessons to the real world
“It depends on the teacher…some [teachers] are more original than others”
“It’s almost a reward to write on the Smartboard so when you get to write you remember what you’re doing”
39
Class Pace Aligned with Students’ Needs
Students consistently communicated frustration with class schedules, the pace of units, and a perception of overall inflexibility
• Desire more consistent feedback on progress
• Often would find more time to review concepts helpful
“Sometimes classes go too fast and we don’t get a chance to really understand what’s going on.”
“Sometimes they [the teachers] go too fast to try and get something in for the curriculum.”
40
Students want to know their teacher genuinely cares about their learning
Maintaining a conducive learning environment was also a common theme
• Strong desire exists for more fair and consistent discipline
“In some classes, it feels like the teachers don’t control the classroom. Some of the students don’t care to learn, so it disrupts the class.”
“I used to have a class where our teacher constantly reminded us about how important our education is and so when we did well we feel really accomplished. He had expectations of us.”
41
Supportive and Organized Classroom Culture
Student Discussion Groups - Observations
Consistent themes emerged across middle and high schools in all areas.
Students were highly interactive, opinionated, and very self-aware.
Students were open to flexible and creative methods that enhance their learning.
It was clear the students appreciated their voices had a chance to be heard.
42
AREAS OF CONCERN FROM COMMUNITY MEETINGS AND ONLINE COMMENTS
EXPLORING FULTON AS A CHARTER SYSTEM
Implications for teacher jobs
• Confusion with “restructuring”
• Mistaken assumption that all would need to reapply for their positions
Implications for school themes and choice
• Mistaken assumption that schools would need to differentiate from each other
• Concern that attendance zones would be eliminated
44
Areas of Concern
Complexity and risk of local school governance councils
• Who?
• How?
• When?
• What?
• Training?
• Oversight?
45
Areas of Concern - Continued
Administrative costs to implement a charter system
• Training
• Development, review, approval, monitoring, accountability for system and schools
Potential for added costs due to new initiatives
Assurance that charter system initiatives have a research-based alignment with student achievement
46
Areas of Concern Emerging in Online Comments
RECOGNITION OF CENTRAL STAFF AND LOCAL SCHOOLS
EXPLORING FULTON AS A CHARTER SYSTEM
48
Anderson, Carice Fasan, Florence LaForge, John C Scott, Vickie P
Anderson, Linda D Gaddy, Richard M Long, June Seda, Pamela
Barger, Amy P Gamble, Jackquline Lott, Woody Shaffer, Emmett G
Beaverson, Barbara Gayles, Pamela L Maggert, Constance R Simpson, Lynn P
Bellcross, Wayne Gillette, Daniel W Matthews, Christopher Stansberry, Celeste
Bennett, Tishangi Gore, Montreal McKie, Wayne Stephens, Karol
Blanton, Brenda M Greenlee, Marisa Meadows, Lynne P Stowell, Laura
Bonner, Monique Greenway, Martha Medlock, Annulet Taylor, Samuel E
Booth, Jessica L Guillory, Patricia H Miller, Tawana D Toller, Allison
Box, Leonard F Gunter, Doryiane Mills, Arthur Wade, Ronnie
Burke, Patrick Hale, Susan Moody, Janet Brown Washington, Eulonda H
Carey, Douglas P Ham, R. Sam Morales, Robert Waters, Alyssia
Cason, Randall A Harness, Terry G Moran, Iris J Watlington, Terry
Clements, Joseph A Hart, Shannon Moss, Sherrie M White, Catherine
Clemons, Cheryl Raiford Helton, David Muma, Mark Woody, Mitzi
Cranford, Haywood C Holly, Russell R Munn, Tom Yarbrough, Kathleen A
Dell, Joseph S Hopkins, Kelly Pass, Donna Yerich, James
Dereef, Marvin Hughes, Jeffery E Peek, Michael H Young, Angela
Dorenkamp, Susan J Ingraham, Deana Pettes, Dorothy A Young, Lance
Dove, Joshua Ivey, Jessie M Politis, Kathy
Dunn, Timothy A Jaffe, Debbie Pruitt-Annisette, Brenda Dallas, Marilyn
Ellis, Gary M Jean, Yvette Rice, Daryl Nichols, Natasha N
Ellison, Daphne, P Johnson, Patty Rice, Lydia Phillips, Tameria
Erickson, Judie Knotts, David J Rumbaugh, Will
Erickson, Nancy B Krause, Amy Schooley, Korynn
Special Thanks – Central Office Staff
Special Thanks – Local School Hosts
49
Johns Creek HS Creekside HS
Buck Greene, Principal Kevin Robinson, Principal
Mike Ilnseher, Assistant Principal Constance Morman, Parent Liaison
Westlake HS Tri-Cities HS
Byron White, Principal Dan Sims, Principal
Kisha Howard, Assistant Principal Audrey Williams, Assistant
Roswell HS Riverwood HS
Ed Spurka, Principal Ed Echols, Principal
"Coach" James Coyle, Assistant Principal Kari Schrock, Assistant Principal
Independence HS at Milton Center
Tabatha Taylor, Principal
Gary Fox, Head Custodian
Special Thanks – Local School Hosts
50
Milton HS McNair MS
Cliff Jones, Principal Paul Brown, Principal
Brandi Terrell, Assistant Principal
Renaissance MS
Maureen Wheeler, Principal Banneker HS
Christian Harden, Assistant Principal Will Bradley, Principal
Kwame Carr, Assistant Principal
Langston Hughes HS
Michael Robinson, Principal Centennial HS
Tomeka Crum, Assistant Steve Miletto, Principal
Jennifer Cassidy, Assistant Principal
Hopewell MS
Bill Thompson, Principal Holcomb Bridge MS
Joy Schroerlucke, Principal