experience in the implementation of the · pdf fileprudential standards, guidelines &...
TRANSCRIPT
1
2012 ANNUAL SADC DFI CEOS FORUM
IN WALVIS BAY, NAMIBIA
EXPERIENCE IN THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
PRUDENTIAL STANDARDS,
GUIDELINES & RATING SYSTEM
(PSGRS) – THE CASE OF FINCORP
6 - 7 DECEMBER 2012.
Walvis Bay, Namibia
DUMISANI J. MSIBI
MANAGING DIRECTOR
STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION
FINCORP Background Information.
DFI Regulatory Environment in Swaziland.
Implementation of PSGRS - Observations.
Implementation – Governance.
Independence
Commercial Principles.
Corporate Social Responsibility.
Implementation – Financial Standards.
Asset Quality
Key Weaknesses as identified by PSGRS.
Implementation – Operational Standards.
Loan Appraisal.
PSGRS Implementation Challenges
Conclusions and Observations.
2
3
SWAZILAND DEVELOPMENT FINANCE
CORPORATION (FINCORP) The Swaziland Development Finance Corporation (FINCORP) has just
celebrated its 15th ANNIVERSARY having commenced operations in 1996 as a national DFI with the main aim of economically empowering Swazi people at grassroots level through the provision of access to sound and sustainable financial services. Tenor of facilities generally range between 6 and 60 months.
FINCORP is a registered private corporation with two shareholders namely the Swaziland Government and a local investment company, Tibiyo TakaNgwane, holding 80% and 20% shares respectively. The main objectives of FINCORP are:
To finance and promote the development of Swazi-owned Enterprises;
To support the expansion of loan financing to SMEs and To create jobs;
To make a meaningful contribution to the eradication of poverty among people at grassroots level.
To support the provision of business advisory services, training, monitoring, technical transfers and development of other products and services for SMEs;
Cumulative disbursements to date exceed E1.6 Billion since inception to over 60 000 SME Clients transcending across all sectors of the economy.
MISSION STATEMENT
To empower our clients by providing broad-based financial
services to enable their growth and success.
Through
◦ fostering supportive client relationships
combined with
◦ prudence and competence
to become
◦ a financially self-sustaining institution.
4
5
SWAZILAND DEVELOPMENT FINANCE
CORPORATION (FINCORP)
HIGHEST ASPIRATION
“To be recognized and acknowledged by our
stakeholders nationally and internationally as the
foremost business development institution providing
financial services.”
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
“To economically empower Swazi entrepreneurs through the
provision of accessible and sustainable financial services.”
OUTREACH & SECTORAL
DISTRIBUTION
6
Economic Environment
Swaziland is a small landlocked country measuring 17 000 square kilometers with a low population of + 1.012 million people.
Agricultural oriented economy. Basically everybody is a farmer in the
rural areas. 24% of total domestic national debt represents agriculture.
In July 2007, Government convened a National Agricultural Summit which underscored the importance of agriculture as a strategic tool for economic development for the country.
Manufacturing Sector largely dominated by large sized corporations.
70% of the population live in rural areas. 66% of the population live below poverty line.
High rate of unemployment – 42% Dual unique legal environment – Civil and Traditional. (i.e Land
Tenure).
7
DEVELOPMENTAL FINANCIAL
INTERMEDIATION
Most DFIs financing agriculture in Swaziland
are Government owned but predominantly source funding from multilateral financing organisations.
Presently very low numbers of small businesses (SMEs). Far less than 20% of the population is involved in small businesses – GEMINI STUDY 2005.
Well developed commercial banking system which however has low interest in financing agriculture and small business in general hence the great significance of DFIs.
8
DFI REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT IN
SWAZILAND
Central Bank only regulates deposit taking institutions – Banks.
Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) in the pipeline – meant to regulated all non bank financial institutions and Co-operatives – BUT UNCLEAR WHETHER DFIs SHALL BE INCLUDED – PSGRS COULD COME IN AS A GOOD FOUNDATION FOR FSRA.
Non Deposit taking DFIs self regulated with passive oversight by the Ministry of Finance – Public Enterprise Unit.
So far there are only three (3) DFIs in Swaziland as the rest take the form of MFIs.
9
10
IMPLEMENTATION OF PSGRS
Observed that while there are different classes of DFIs in the continent, the standards tend to be one size fits all. Some DFIs are regional whilst others are domestic and small in scale and scope.
Some will forever be state owned with no prospects of diversified shareholding.
Non deposit taking institutions are prejudiced as things stand. It may be necessary to separate Deposit Taking and Non Deposit Taking Institutions for benchmarking purposes.
Recommended risk mitigating ratios not entirely in tandem with Development Finance Expectations namely making finance more accessible to marginalized sectors of the population - i.e recommendation of at least 110% collateral.
SMEs at the lower end of the economy may find such compliance requirements onerous which may limit growth of the DFI.
11
IMPLEMENTATION OF PSGRS – cont
In order to bring credence to the implementation of the PSGRS, we
strongly advocate for External Verification of results notwithstanding
the cost associated with this.
Indeed External Auditors charge high fees
for the verification exercise - For FINCORP
additional 6% of audit fees was incurred.
Would strongly advocate for a central verification point within
the AADFI Secretariat in order to ensure uniformity.
Interesting to note that SADC DFRC & AADFI are predominantly all
about institutional strengthening and capacity building yet standards
conspicuously ignore that aspect. A DFI is as good as its Human Capital
(101).
Board Appraisal is also omitted (YET GOVERNANCE IS KEY).
12
PSGRS - GOVERNANCE:
INDEPENDENCE FROM GOVERNMENT
State ownership legacy has dictated that DFIs be generally funded by Governments of the economies in which they operate.
PSGRS creates the urge and awareness to diversify capital base and funding sources of the DFI thus enhancing effectiveness and sustainability – FINCORP already talking to external investors and Gvt.
The starting point should be to move away from being established by way of an Act of Parliament to Privately Registered Corporations which properly positions a DFI for divesting shareholding. (Refer FINCORP)
Government supervision of DFIs through line ministries not at all effective.
National Non Bank unregulated DFIs should advocate for a local supervision and regulatory authority that will constantly monitor their activities – Govt Ministries have inadequate capacity !
13
PSGRS - OPERATING ON
COMMERCIAL PRINCIPLES
Non Performance Based Reward Systems pose serious dysfunctional consequences for DFIs.
A recent salary survey found salaries to be quite competitive at FINCORP.
Performance based incentive scheme in place.
However recent salary caps imposed by Governments are counter productive. FINCORP currently battling with this phenomenon as the Swaziland Government issued a circular placing a cap on salaries for executives in state owned enterprises.
Performance related remuneration approach promotes effective service delivery.
14
PSGRS - : CORPORATE CITIZEN
GOVERNANCE
There is often the temptation to undertake Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives on an adhoc basis with no policy in place.
PSGRS has pushed FINCORP to develop a policy on CSR which was approved by the Board and now forms part of the annual budget.
Tendency to have old and static DFI mandate charter from the Shareholders (Govt) which is hardly / never reviewed is a challenge.
PSGRS - : OPERATIONS
STANDARDS - POLICIES FINCORP obtained the lowest of all scores in
2009 which was 25% and this prompted organization to pay particular attention to this shortcoming. (99 &100)
Consequently consideration for possible diversification of income streams through other sources than interest income to other fees and product offering i.e Invoice Discounting.
In April 2011 the Board commissioned a wide ranging inventory and review of all operational policies which were later approved.
15
PSGRS - : OPERATIONS STANDARDS
– LOAN APPRAISAL
Asset Quality a challenge to most DFIs due to volatile operating environment.
Use of standards prompted FINCORP to review upwards collateral and other risk mitigating requirements such as partial collateral and promoting much secure contract farming financing.
Improved Credit Committee composition by involving support departments such as I.T and HR to balance objectivity – as suggested by PSGRS.
110% suggested collateral requirement a big challenge – In fact recently reduced collateral requirement to 70%,
16
PSGRS - : FINANCIAL STANDARDS
– ASSET QUALITY
FINCORP quite rigorous on application of loan
provisioning policies.
Current Bad Debt Provisions covers 57% of
contaminated loans.
Institution faced with a big challenge on FUNDING
as it primarily relies on its Shareholders and
lending institutions for additional equity and
medium term lines of credit and facilities with local
and international funders.
17
KEY WEAKNESSES AS IDENTIFIED
BY PSGRS APPLICATION
STANDARD ACTION
Governance: # 1 & 5
Sufficient Independence from
Government (75%)
• Actively lobbying and looking for private
strategic partners (Pension Funds) – ongoing
discussions.
• Appointment of Board Members skills base
fairly balanced / diversified over last 15 years but
criteria not policy but has simply been practice by
current Minister.
Financial: # 55 & 58
Asset Diversity & Safety (64%)
• Largest single exposure of one extreme
investment – Hotel Investment.
• No equity investment as yet but included equity
investment in new business strategy.
• Currently looking at investing in own office
block. Already purchased two plots in the Capital
City and looking at investing E36 Million ($4.5M)
in office buildings. 18
KEY WEAKNESSES AS IDENTIFIED
BY PSGRS APPLICATION
19
STANDARD ACTION
Operational: # 86,87 & 100
Loan Appraisal Policy &
Procedures (72%)
• 110% Security requirement not compatible
with SME Lending.
• No equity financing as yet but part of new
strategy.
• Projects predominantly assessed on viability than
propensity to create new jobs / impact.
•Already engaged a Consultant through
Commonwealth Secretariat to review and
strengthen policies.
Operations Strategy Policies
(75%)
• Non deposit taking owing to regulation but have
mitigated such by taking deposits and keeping them
with a local bank – which however does not rectify
problem.
• New Products have recently been developed to
diversify income streams as part of new strategy i.e
Invoice Discounting; Property Development; and
Insurance Agency.
PSGRS – GENERAL CHALLENGES
Compliance with environmental requirements for
low end financed small & medium enterprises.
Cap placed on interest rates prevents proper
pricing for risk thus compromising optimal risk
management.
Unclear performance contract / mandate from
Shareholders – Shifting regime priorities.
Prevalence of unclear criteria for appointing Board
Members among state owned DFIs.
20
IMPLEMENTATION OF PSGRS:
CONCLUSIONS DFIs in the continent are quite diversified in nature and
application of standards ought to somehow recognize
that.
The Standards are a powerful medium of raising
awareness among DFIs on key operations and governance
principles. Should be institutionalized – As FINCORP we
are certainly now more aware / conscious of critical best
practice elements than we were before.
The Standards present a good foundation for the
development of regulatory guidelines for countries not yet
supervising & regulating DFIs. 21
IMPLEMENTATION OF PSGRS:
CONCLUSIONS
Standards will in the long run bring immense credibility to the operations of African DFIs historically associated with lackluster financial performance, impact and outreach.
Standards will enhance ability to attract more capital and investment into DFIs.
FINCORP’s 2009 assessment results enhanced the resource mobilization efforts locally and internationally. Most creditors derived confidence – over last 3 years raised over E200 Million.
22
IMPLEMENTATION OF PSGRS:
CONCLUSIONS
Benchmarking against one another should in the long run bring uniformity and positive impact on performance and delivery of respective mandates.
FINCORP fully supports ANNUAL AWARDS in order to provide an incentive to DFIs to adopt standards as they are destined to strengthen the Domestic Financial Systems.
23
IMPLEMENTATION OF PSGRS:
CONCLUSIONS
The direct interest and partnership of AfDB on the PSGRS should be maintained going forward as it brings immense credence to the process.
More focus for DFIs should be on reported areas of weakness identified by the PSGRS in order to improve.
FINCORP has managed to involve key structures of the organization on the PSGRS namely Executive Management and the Board. The Board directed that standards should form part strategic planning and monitoring tool.
24
IMPLEMENTATION OF PSGRS:
CONCLUSIONS Efforts should be made to get national Central Banks to
embrace the PSGRS and incorporate them into their regulation and supervision efforts for national DFIs.
Year on Year results comparison:
Above results largely due to improved profitability; adoption and formalization of policies; strengthened provision policies (Risk Management) and product diversification.
FINCORP sees great value in the implementation of PSGRS and has institutionalized the process by allocating responsibility over the key components of the PSGRS to senior executives (MD; GM & FM).
25
2009 2011 2012
79% (B) 84% (A) 87% (A+)
AWARDS – IMAGE BUILDING
26
2011 AADFI AWARDS 2012 EURO BID AWARDS >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2012 GLOBAL TRADE LEADERS
CLUB (GTLC)
IMAGE BUILDING !!!
27
28
Thank you ……
FEEDBACK !
“HELPING SWAZI ENTREPRENEURS TO HELP THEMSELVES”