exchange 2010 & 2013/2016 esrp performance report silverton...

4
TWITTER.COM/RAYLUCCHESI | RAYONSTORAGE.COM | GREYBEARDSONSTORAGE.COM +1-720-221-7270 | SILVERTONCONSULTING.COM © 2016 SILVERTON CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Exchange 2010 & 2013/2016 ESRP performance report Silverton Consulting, Inc. StorInt™ Briefing This Storage Intelligence (StorInt™) dispatch covers Microsoft Exchange 2010 and Exchange 2013/2016 Solution Review Program (ESRP) results 1 . Since we last reviewed this 5000 and over mailbox category nine months ago, there have been at least 17 new submissions from Nutanix (1), Pure Systems (1), Tegile (1), Oracle (1), InforTrend (2), Lenovo (2) and Dell (9). A few of these are AFA (Pure & Tegile) and some are hybrid (Oracle, Nutanix & Lenovo). Just about every one of our top 10 charts have changed. We select 3 of these to show below. Latest ESRP V3.0 & 4.0 (E2010&E2013) performance In Figure 1 we show our Exchange database access latency chart. Figure 1 SCI’s ESRP reported access latencies (sorted by read latency) 1 ESRP results from https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/office/dn756396.aspx as of 25Oct2016

Upload: others

Post on 17-Jul-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Exchange 2010 & 2013/2016 ESRP performance report Silverton …silvertonconsulting.com/nwsa/SCIESRP161030-010.pdf · 2016-10-30 · The Oracle FS1-2 had a read latency of 1.0msec

TWITTER.COM/RAYLUCCHESI|RAYONSTORAGE.COM|GREYBEARDSONSTORAGE.COM

+1-720-221-7270|SILVERTONCONSULTING.COM©2016SILVERTONCONSULTING,INC.ALLRIGHTSRESERVED

Exchange 2010 & 2013/2016 ESRP performance report SilvertonConsulting,Inc.StorInt™Briefing ThisStorageIntelligence(StorInt™)dispatchcoversMicrosoftExchange2010andExchange2013/2016SolutionReviewProgram(ESRP)results1.Sincewelastreviewedthis5000andovermailboxcategoryninemonthsago,therehavebeenatleast17newsubmissionsfromNutanix(1),PureSystems(1),Tegile(1),Oracle(1),InforTrend(2),Lenovo(2)andDell(9).AfewoftheseareAFA(Pure&Tegile)andsomearehybrid(Oracle,Nutanix&Lenovo).Justabouteveryoneofourtop10chartshavechanged.Weselect3ofthesetoshowbelow.

LatestESRPV3.0&4.0(E2010&E2013)performanceInFigure1weshowourExchangedatabaseaccesslatencychart.

Figure1SCI’sESRPreportedaccesslatencies(sortedbyreadlatency)

1ESRPresultsfromhttps://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/office/dn756396.aspxasof25Oct2016

Page 2: Exchange 2010 & 2013/2016 ESRP performance report Silverton …silvertonconsulting.com/nwsa/SCIESRP161030-010.pdf · 2016-10-30 · The Oracle FS1-2 had a read latency of 1.0msec

30Oct2016 SCIEXCHANGE2010-2013/2016ESRPPERFORMANCEREPORT PAGE2OF4

TWITTER.COM/RAYLUCCHESI|RAYONSTORAGE.COM|+1-720-221-7270|SILVERTONCONSULTING.COM

©2014SILVERTONCONSULTING,INC.ALLRIGHTSRESERVED

InFigure1Oracle,PureandTegilearenew.HerewecanseetheinfluenceofAFAandhybridstoragebothofwhichprovidegreatdatabaseaccesslatencies.TheOracleFS1-2hadareadlatencyof1.0msecwhilePureandTegiletiedfor2ndwitha1.1msec.readaccesslatency.Databasewritelatencyshowsawholeothersidetothesesystems.Pureperformedbestwithawritelatencyof1.6msec,whileOracleprovided1.8msec.andTegilesupplieda3.1msecwriteresponsetime.AFAandHybridstorageperformworseforsmallblockwritesversusread,butforPureandOracle.theystillrespondmuchfasterthandisk-onlysolutions.Ontheotherhand,Logwritelatencyisameasureoflargeblocksequentialwriteactivity.AFAsgenerallycanperformbetteronlargerthansmallwrites,butsurprisingly,Pure’s#1logwriteresponsetimeof0.41msecwasonlyslightlybetterthanthealldisk,IBMStorwizeV5000system.Largesequentialwritesstillperformverywellondisk.Next,wereportonESRPLogplaybacktimeinFigure2

Figure2ESRPTop10LogPlaybackresults

InFigure2,Pure(#2),Oracle(#4),Tegile(#5),andthetwoDellMD3860f(#8&#10)storagesystemsareallnew.WeliketheLogPlaybackmetricbecauseitisamixtureof

Page 3: Exchange 2010 & 2013/2016 ESRP performance report Silverton …silvertonconsulting.com/nwsa/SCIESRP161030-010.pdf · 2016-10-30 · The Oracle FS1-2 had a read latency of 1.0msec

30Oct2016 SCIEXCHANGE2010-2013/2016ESRPPERFORMANCEREPORT PAGE3OF4

TWITTER.COM/RAYLUCCHESI|RAYONSTORAGE.COM|+1-720-221-7270|SILVERTONCONSULTING.COM

©2014SILVERTONCONSULTING,INC.ALLRIGHTSRESERVED

largeblock,readsequentialandsmallblock,databaseupdates(read/writes).RecallthatESRP’sLogPlaybackistheaveragetimeittakestoplayback1logfile(1MB)againstasingledatabase,averagedacross10Kruns.HybridandAFAsarenotasdominantinlogplaybackasinaccesslatencyabove.Thecurrent#1inESRPLogPlayback(HP[E]4400EVA)wasanalldisk,mid-rangesystem.ThenewDellsystemsareamidrange,alldisk,FCdirectsubmissions(FCattachedwithnoswitch)runningwith15Kand20Kmailboxes.Finally,wepresentinFigure3,ournormalizedDBtransfers/second/1Kmailboxes.

Figure3SCITop10ESRPDBtransfers/secondnormalizedfor1Kmailboxes

InFigure3,theonlynewsubmissionisthePureFlashArray//m20whichcamein2ndwith751readand373writedatabasetransfers/secondper1000mailboxes.The#1,HP(E)3PARstorageused1202TBdiskdrivesandthe#2PureFlashArrayhad20SSDs,showingthatthere’sasignificant(~6:1)performanceadvantageonaone-to-one,perdevicebasis.It’ssurprisingtherearenootherhybridorAFAsubmissionsinFigure3.ButthismaybeproofofPure’sarchitecturesophisticationascomparedtotheothernewAFA/hybridsolutions.

Page 4: Exchange 2010 & 2013/2016 ESRP performance report Silverton …silvertonconsulting.com/nwsa/SCIESRP161030-010.pdf · 2016-10-30 · The Oracle FS1-2 had a read latency of 1.0msec

30Oct2016 SCIEXCHANGE2010-2013/2016ESRPPERFORMANCEREPORT PAGE4OF4

TWITTER.COM/RAYLUCCHESI|RAYONSTORAGE.COM|+1-720-221-7270|SILVERTONCONSULTING.COM

©2014SILVERTONCONSULTING,INC.ALLRIGHTSRESERVED

SummaryWe’realwayshappytoseenewsubmissions.WefirmlybelievethatESRPisthemostcomprehensive,realworldmeasureofstoragesystemperformancethatexiststoday,evenifMicrosoftwillnotcallita“benchmark”.MoreAFA’sandhybridstoragearegoodtoseeastheybothseemtohavetakenoverthemarketforenterprisestorage.Ontheotherhand,howAFAcompression/deduplicationimpactESRPactivityisunknown.ESRPneedstoreportrealizedcompressionanddeduplicationratios,atleastforAFAs,asitmayprovideasignificantperformanceadvantage.AlsoAFAsubmissionsneedtofullydetailcompression/deduplicationstoragesettingsfordatabaseandlogdevices.IfyouareinterestedinevenmoreinformationonblockstorageperformancepleaseexamineourSANStorageBuyingGuideavailableforpurchaseonourwebsite,whichincludesChampionCharts™forOLTP,ThroughputandEmailworkloadsacrossenterprise,mid-rangeandSMBstoragesystemsandnowincludesanallflasharray(AFA)ChampionsChartforOLTP.UsetheQRcodebelowleftformoreinformationontheSANStorageBuyingGuide.WealsoprovidesomeadditionalESRPresultsanalysisinourrecentlyupdated,SAN-NASBuyingGuide,alsoavailableonourwebsite.ConstructivecommentsonhowtoimproveouranalysesforExchangeoranyofourperformancereportsarealwayswelcome.Moreover,ifyoudetecterrorsinthisoranyofourotherperformancereports,pleasedoletusknowandwewillcorrectthemassoonaspossible.Ifyoureceivedthisreportfromsomeoneelse,pleaseconsidersigningupforyourownfreecopyofSCI’sStorageIntelligence(StorInt™)monthlye-newsletterusingtheQRcodebelowright.Weprovidecommentaryonrecentmajorstoragesystemannouncementsaswellasanalyzecurrentstoragesystemperformanceresults/benchmarkseverymonth.WeplantoanalyzeMicrosoftESRPresultsagaininthreemonths.

Silverton Consulting, Inc., is a U.S.-based Storage, Strategy & Systems consulting firm offering products and services to the data storage community.

(QRcode:SANStorageBuyingGuide)(QRcode:Newslettersignup)