example 18.5 determining a suitable binder grade

Upload: veronica-tobias

Post on 04-Jun-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    1/22

    Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    - Correct for slow moving traffic: Move binder one grade higher. For

    minimum 50 percent reliability, binder if PG 64-16. For minimum of 98

    percent reliability, binder is PG 70-16.

    - Correct for ESAL > 30 x 108 . Move binder one grade higher. For minimum

    50 percent reliability, binder is PG 70-16. for minimum 98 percent reliability,

    binder is PG 76-16.

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    2/22

    Table 18.13 Section of Asphalt Binder Performance Grades on the Basis of

    Climate, Traffic Speed, and Traffic Volume

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    3/22

    1. Select the types of loading.

    2. Move horizontally to the high pavement design temperature.

    3. Move down the low pavement design temperature.

    4. Identify the Binder Grade.

    5. ESALS > 107consider increase of one high temperature grade. ESALS > 3 x 102

    increase one high temperature grade.

    Example:

    Standing load, high design temperature

    Low design temperature = - 25oC

    Grade = PG 70-28

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    4/22

    Table 18.14 Coarse Aggregate Angularity Criteria

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    5/22

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    6/22

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    7/22

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    8/22

    The clay content is defined as the percentage of clayey material in the

    portion of aggregate passing through the 4.75-mm sieve. It is obtained by

    conducting the AASHTO T176 designated test Plastic Fines in Graded Aggregates

    and Soils by Use of Sand Equivalent Test.

    Tapping Bottom of

    Cylinder

    ApparatusManually-Operated Shaker

    Irrigation Clay Reading

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    9/22

    Table 18.17 Clay Content Criteria

    Table 18.17 gives minimum allowable values for sand equivalent for

    different traffic loads.

    Traffic, Million ESALs Sand Equivalent

    Minimum, Percent

    < 0.3 40

    < 1 40

    < 3 40

    < 10 45

    < 30 45< 100 50

    100 50

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    10/22

    Gradation. The distribution of aggregate particle sizes for a given blend of

    aggregate mixture is known as the design aggregate structure. The gradation

    system used for Superpave is based on the 0.45 gradation plot. In order to

    understand the gradation system used, it is first necessary to define certain

    gradation terms that the Superpave system uses. These are maximum sizes,

    nominal maximum sizes and maximum density gradation.

    Maximum size is defined is one sieve larger than the nominal maximum size, and

    the nominal maximum size is one sieve larger than the first sieve that retains more

    than 10 percent of the aggregate. Five mixture gradations are specified in the

    Superpave system, as shown in Table 18.18.

    Maximum density gradationis obtained when the aggregate particles fit together

    in their densest form. An important characteristic of the 0.45 power plot is that

    the maximum density gradation for a sample of soil is given by the straight line

    joining the maximum size and the origin (Figure 18.16).

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    11/22

    An acceptable aggregate gradation is defined by specifying control points on the

    maximum density gradation chart for the smallest sieve size (0.075 mm), the

    nominal maximum size, and an intermediate size sieve (2.36 mm). An acceptable

    soil blend therefore should have maximum density gradation line that lies within

    these control points.

    Table 18.18 Superpave Mixture Gradation

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    12/22

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    13/22

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    14/22

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    15/22

    18.6.2 Volumetric Trial Mixture Design

    This consists of:

    Selection of design aggregate structure

    Determining trial percentage of asphalt binder for each trial aggregate blend

    Evaluating trial mix designs

    Obtaining design asphalt binder content

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    16/22

    Determining Trial Percentage of

    Asphalt Binder for each Trial Aggregate Blend

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    17/22

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    18/22

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    19/22

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    20/22

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    21/22

  • 8/13/2019 Example 18.5 Determining a Suitable Binder Grade

    22/22