ex 2.4 double pendulum
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
1/47
INTRODUCTORY COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
NAME: AROOJ MUKARRAM
EXERCISE 2.4:
SOLUTION:
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
2/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
3/47
Theta1/ Theta2 = 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, . , 1.0 (Angle vs Time)
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
4/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
5/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
6/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
7/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
8/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
9/47
Theta1/ Theta2 = 0.0, -0.1, -0.2, . , -1.0 (Angle vs Time)
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
10/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
11/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
12/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
13/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
14/47
Theta1/ Theta2 = 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, . , 1.0 (Lissajous curves)
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
15/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
16/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
17/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
18/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
19/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
20/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
21/47
Theta1/ Theta2 = 0.0, -0.1, -0.2, . , -1.0 (Lissajous curves)
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
22/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
23/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
24/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
25/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
26/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
27/47
Theta1/ Theta2 = 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, . , 1.0 (Trace)
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
28/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
29/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
30/47
Theta1/ Theta2 = -0.1, -0.2, . , -1.0 (Trace)
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
31/47
OUTPUT ANALYSIS:
For positive values of 1 / 2 :
From angle vs time graphs: At 0.7 both masses move together in same direction and reach their
maximum and minimum values at same time. At smaller values of 0.0 and 0.1, the motions of masses
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
32/47
are very different. But as this ratio is increased, masses start moving in sync and at 0.7 they move
together in same directions.
From Lissajous figures: At 0.7 it shows, the Lissajous figure shows a straight line (positive slope). At
other times, the figures cover some area (with particular boundary shapes) in the configuration space. If
simulation is run for a much longer time, the space inside these graphs will be completely filled.
From trace graphs: At 0.7 the trace is a nice parabola. For other ratios, the trace is comparatively
complex.
This implies that 1 / 2 = 0.7 gives a normal mode (symmetric).
For negative values of 1 / 2 :
From angle vs time graphs: At 0.7 both masses move in opposite direction so that when one mass
reaches its maximum, the other is at minimum. At other ratios the motions of the masses have no such
relationship.
From Lissajous figures: At 0.7 it shows, the Lissajous figure shows a straight line (negative slope). At
other times, the figures cover some area (with particular boundary shapes) in the configuration space. If
simulation is run for a much longer time, the space inside these graphs will be completely filled.
From trace graphs: At 0.7 the trace is a parabola, that fills up some area in the figure. For other ratios,
the trace is comparatively complex.
This implies that 1 / 2 =- 0.7 gives a normal mode (anti-symmetric).
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
33/47
EXERCISE 2.4 Part b
The program is run with following input values (Exercise 2.4-b.py):
2 = 0.0
1 = [1.57,1.58, 2.8, 3.8, 4.7, 4.8]
Keeping 2 constant and changing the 1 values from /2 to 3/2 give the following output for
Angle vs time graphs
Lissajous figures
Trace graphs
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
34/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
35/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
36/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
37/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
38/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
39/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
40/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
41/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
42/47
OUTPUT ANALYSIS:
From the above graphs, we see that motion is chaotic for 1 between /2 and 3/2. The angles versustime graphs in this region do not show regular repetitive behavior. Also the Lissajous figures and trace
do not have a pattern and are rather messy figures.
Step size effect on evolution of the system:
If the programs are run by decreasing the step size (for chaotic and non-chaotic regimes), the Lissajous
figures and traces graphs are no longer smooth curves .
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
43/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
44/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
45/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
46/47
-
7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum
47/47