everything you wanted to know about the x-ray background … andrea comastri (inaf-oabologna-italy)...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
218 views
TRANSCRIPT
Everything you wanted to know
about the X-ray background …
Everything you wanted to know
about the X-ray background …
Andrea Comastri (INAF-OABologna-Andrea Comastri (INAF-OABologna-Italy)Italy)
Gilli R., Comastri A., Hasinger G. 2006 AA in Gilli R., Comastri A., Hasinger G. 2006 AA in press press
astro-ph/0610939 astro-ph/0610939
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
2
OUTLINE OUTLINE
Demography and evolution of obscured AGN from XRB models -> uncovering the most elusive accreting Black Holes
Does the unified scheme depend from luminosity and redshift ? MISST
Perspectives for future X-ray multi-wavelength surveys and models
ANEW
Demography and evolution of obscured AGN from XRB models -> uncovering the most elusive accreting Black Holes
Does the unified scheme depend from luminosity and redshift ? MISST
Perspectives for future X-ray multi-wavelength surveys and models
ANEW
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
4
Deep X-ray surveys have resolved some 80% of the XRB (below a few keV ) but “only” 50% > 6 keV (Worsley+05) and a few % above 10 keV.
Wealth of X-ray and multi-wavelength follow-up available unlikely to be substantially modified in the next decade or so
Worth to make an effort to constrain the missing population (Compton Thick AGN) and make solid prediction for future missions and for currently ongoing multi- efforts to efficiently select `obscured’ AGN (Risaliti+99, Fiore +03,Tozzi+06,Martinez-Sansigre+05, Georgantopoulos+06; …)
Deep X-ray surveys have resolved some 80% of the XRB (below a few keV ) but “only” 50% > 6 keV (Worsley+05) and a few % above 10 keV.
Wealth of X-ray and multi-wavelength follow-up available unlikely to be substantially modified in the next decade or so
Worth to make an effort to constrain the missing population (Compton Thick AGN) and make solid prediction for future missions and for currently ongoing multi- efforts to efficiently select `obscured’ AGN (Risaliti+99, Fiore +03,Tozzi+06,Martinez-Sansigre+05, Georgantopoulos+06; …)
Why is still worth fitting the XRB ?
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
5
Assuming the same evolution of “known” AGN and the intensity of the 30 keV XRB peak it is possible to estimate the “size” of the “mildly” (24 < logNH < 25) Compton Thick AGN population
A complete (fair) census of the missing Compton Thick AGN is important for BH mass function, SMBH/galaxy evolution, accretion efficicency, Eddington ratios, …
The BH mass density argument could also be used to constrain the number of heavily (logNH > 25; i.e. NGC 1068 like) Compton thick AGN
Assuming the same evolution of “known” AGN and the intensity of the 30 keV XRB peak it is possible to estimate the “size” of the “mildly” (24 < logNH < 25) Compton Thick AGN population
A complete (fair) census of the missing Compton Thick AGN is important for BH mass function, SMBH/galaxy evolution, accretion efficicency, Eddington ratios, …
The BH mass density argument could also be used to constrain the number of heavily (logNH > 25; i.e. NGC 1068 like) Compton thick AGN
Model schemeModel scheme
• XRB flux uncertain, so use the more robust constraints below 10 keV (eg. source counts) to lock the properties (eg obs/unobs ratio, NH dist.) of the Compton Thin (log NH < 24) AGN
• Estimate the Compton Thin/Unobs. ratio by comparing hard vs. soft XLF.
• Absorption distribution from X-ray counts.
• Include continuum slope dispersion.
• Add Compton thick AGN to fit the 30 keV bump
• Verify assumptions/make predictions on Compton Thick AGN
• XRB flux uncertain, so use the more robust constraints below 10 keV (eg. source counts) to lock the properties (eg obs/unobs ratio, NH dist.) of the Compton Thin (log NH < 24) AGN
• Estimate the Compton Thin/Unobs. ratio by comparing hard vs. soft XLF.
• Absorption distribution from X-ray counts.
• Include continuum slope dispersion.
• Add Compton thick AGN to fit the 30 keV bump
• Verify assumptions/make predictions on Compton Thick AGN
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
9
Unabsorbed:logNH<21
Compton-Thin:21<logNH<24(Compton reflection high energy cut-off 200 keV)
Compton-Thick:
Mildly (log NH =24-25)(NGC 6240, Circinus)
Heavily (log NH >25)(NGC1068)
Dispersion Dispersion = 0.2 = 0.2
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
11
Hard XLF=Compton Thin + unobscured
Ueda+03La Franca+05
Soft XLF=unobscured
(Hasinger+05)La Franca+05La Franca+05
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
12
Best fit Best fit ratiosratios
~ 4 at low ~ 4 at low Log Lx < 44Log Lx < 44LuminositiesLuminosities
~ 1 at high~ 1 at highLog Lx > 44Log Lx > 44luminositiesluminosities
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
13
Obscured AGN fraction vs luminosity
Observed Intrinsic(i.e. folded with selection effects) Akylas+06
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
15
Soft counts areSoft counts aremeasured withmeasured with good accuracygood accuracy
over a large over a large range of fluxesrange of fluxes
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
18
The fraction of heavily CT depends The fraction of heavily CT depends from the assumed dispersion and from the assumed dispersion and
reflection efficiency (2%) !reflection efficiency (2%) !
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
19
Obscured AGN fraction vs sample limiting flux
ThickThick
All abs.
All abs.
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
20
Correction for Compton-Thick sources from XRB models wholeAGN pop considered
The only free parameters are the accretion efficiency and Eddington ratio
L = ε dM/dt c2
L = λ LEdd
Correction for Compton-Thick sources from XRB models wholeAGN pop considered
The only free parameters are the accretion efficiency and Eddington ratio
L = ε dM/dt c2
L = λ LEdd
Marconi+04Marconi+04
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
21
Determine locus in ε-λ plane where there is the best match between local and relic BHMF!
ε=0.04-0.10 λ=0.08-0.5 which are consistent with common ‘beliefs’ on AGNs
Determine locus in ε-λ plane where there is the best match between local and relic BHMF!
ε=0.04-0.10 λ=0.08-0.5 which are consistent with common ‘beliefs’ on AGNs
2%
0.5%10%
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
22
Summary of XRB model results
Summary of XRB model results CT as many as thin , fraction depends from
scattering efficiency, dispersion in spectral slopes and 30 keV intensity
More obscured AGN at low L -> at QSO luminosities 1 Thin + 1 Thick for each bright unobscured quasar
A “high” 2-10 keV XRB intensity cannot be easily accounted for without violating other constraints (counts, average spectra,…)
Predictions for the space density of obscured (CT) AGN to be compared with present (Spitzer) and future (Herschel) IR surveys and especially > 10 keV survey (Simbol-X)
CT as many as thin , fraction depends from scattering efficiency, dispersion in spectral slopes and 30 keV intensity
More obscured AGN at low L -> at QSO luminosities 1 Thin + 1 Thick for each bright unobscured quasar
A “high” 2-10 keV XRB intensity cannot be easily accounted for without violating other constraints (counts, average spectra,…)
Predictions for the space density of obscured (CT) AGN to be compared with present (Spitzer) and future (Herschel) IR surveys and especially > 10 keV survey (Simbol-X)
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
23
Luminosity and redshift dependence
Luminosity and redshift dependence
Obscuration (anti)-correlates with Luminosity (Lawrence & Elvis 1982) -> Ueda+03, Hasinger04, La Franca+05 … but see Dwelly & Page 06
The obscured fraction increases with z (La Franca+05, Ballantyne+05, Treister & Urry 06) or remains constant (Ueda+03, Hasinger04, Tozzi+06; Dwelly & Page 06; Akylas+06)
Obscuration (anti)-correlates with Luminosity (Lawrence & Elvis 1982) -> Ueda+03, Hasinger04, La Franca+05 … but see Dwelly & Page 06
The obscured fraction increases with z (La Franca+05, Ballantyne+05, Treister & Urry 06) or remains constant (Ueda+03, Hasinger04, Tozzi+06; Dwelly & Page 06; Akylas+06)
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
24
Need to uniformely sample the Luminosity-Redshift Plane
Take into account selection biases associated to low counting statistic
Incompleteness of spectroscopic redshifts and photo-z uncertainties
Need to uniformely sample the Luminosity-Redshift Plane
Take into account selection biases associated to low counting statistic
Incompleteness of spectroscopic redshifts and photo-z uncertainties
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
25
The Cosmic Cycle of Galaxy and AGN
evolution The Cosmic Cycle of Galaxy and AGN
evolution (Hopkins et al. 2005) Mergers between gas
rich galaxies drive gas which fuel both SF andQSO activity (QSO mode)Obscured growth (ULIRG, SCUBA phase, 4pi Covering ?)
BH feedback expels Gas --> BL QSO
Shut down of BH activity dead quasars (or slowly accreting BH) in red galaxies (radio mode)
The QSO light curvesare mass and obscuration dependent
X-ray Surveys Cambridge November 6, 2006
26
AGN activityAGN activity
Models predict bolometric luminosity/properties
bolometric approach is needed for a proper census of SMBH (most of them are obscured or elusive)
Bolometric LF and evolution is a key parameter
(poorly known–”attempt” by Hopkins+06, HX,SX, B-band and 15 micron, obscuration and SEDs are luminosity dependent and likely redshift dependent)
Models predict bolometric luminosity/properties
bolometric approach is needed for a proper census of SMBH (most of them are obscured or elusive)
Bolometric LF and evolution is a key parameter
(poorly known–”attempt” by Hopkins+06, HX,SX, B-band and 15 micron, obscuration and SEDs are luminosity dependent and likely redshift dependent)
The evolution of both brightThe evolution of both brightand faint end can be better and faint end can be better measured with a bolometric measured with a bolometric
approach (modulo Compton Thick)approach (modulo Compton Thick)
SummarySummary A proper census of SMBH demography and
evolution (especially for the most obscured sources) cannot rely only on multi- follow-ups
of X-ray surveys but requires a bolometric approach : multiwavelength selection and in
particular IR (Spitzer) + XRB and Mass density/function arguments -> “IR background as a bonus” Fit the data (XRB, counts, …) with a time
dependent model for the AGN activity to account for Redshift and Luminosity
dependence.
A proper census of SMBH demography and evolution (especially for the most obscured sources) cannot rely only on multi- follow-ups
of X-ray surveys but requires a bolometric approach : multiwavelength selection and in
particular IR (Spitzer) + XRB and Mass density/function arguments -> “IR background as a bonus” Fit the data (XRB, counts, …) with a time
dependent model for the AGN activity to account for Redshift and Luminosity
dependence.