event sponsors supporting partners - mefma - homemefma.org/images/stories/pdf/mefmaworkshop... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
WORKSHOP & NETWORKING EVENTNovember 12, 2018 - Dammam, KSA
Event Sponsors
Supporting Partners
Value Added of Professional, Comprehensive Facility Management (especially for public facilities, including hospitals)
Peter PrischlManaging Director – Drees & Sommer International
„Value Added“ and „added value“ are practically the same,but let us stick to „Value Added“ as the technical term for the economic concept„Value Added“ or „added value“ - difference
3
„Value Added“ Technical term for the economic concept
„… added value …“ Colloquial term, such as in „he really added value to our football team“
Value Added is – in the end – defined by the buyer / consumerValue Added - definition
4
Value Added =
Price – Cost
Output – Input .
Value of the Output(s) – value of the Input(s) .
Value Added is the value by which the Output exceeds the Input (for producing a service)
Example: Value Added calculation
5
CLIENT gets full FM Services for an office site with 400 workplaces, pays SAR 2.500 per workplace / month..
SERVICE PROVIDER OUTPUT (Income): 400 x 2.500 …. 1.000 TSAR (One million SAR)----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SERVICE PROVIDER INPUT (Costs): – Subcontractors ………………........... 300
– Consumable materials …….......... 60
– Own direct personnel ……..………. 400
– Selling, General & Admin. Costs . 160(incl. Depreciation)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------
SERVICE PROVIDER‘S VALUE ADDED 80 TSAR
?
6
1. What are your three biggest challenges to produce Value Added in Facility Management right now?
2. What would help you most to reach these Values Added in Real Estate and Facility Management in 2019?
What is „professional, comprehensive Facility Management“ (FM)?ISO 41000 Facility Management Standard: Definition
7
“Facility Management is the organizational function which integrates people, place and process
within the built environment with the purpose of improving the quality of life of people
and the productivity of the core business.”
Facility Management has two fundamental aspects:
Space and infrastructure
People and organisation
8
Let us start on the strategic level: With these ten Real Estate & Facility Management strategies you create a coherent Value Added in response to strategic challenges:
9
0 % 100 %
IMPORTANCE
Stimulate innovation
Increase flexibility (of the corporation)
Reduce real estate and workplace cost
Optimise financial structure
Contribute to sustainability
Increase real estate value
Control risks
Support culture and corporate branding
Increase employee engagement
Increase productivity
Definitions / Explanations:Ten Real Estate & Facility Management (CREFM) strategies / 1
10
▪ Increase flexibility- Physical / spatial / technical flexibility – adaptability of building constructions / technical / workplace infrastructure- Functional / organisational flexibility – adaptability of buildings, workspaces and functions to changing demands- Legal / financial flexibility – adaptability to corporate financial demands regarding capital employed – disposability
▪ Increase productivity- Healthy work environment, inducing minimal absence due to (physical and mental) health reasons- Supportive work environment, which minimises hindrances and enables optimal employee output
▪ Reduce real estate and workplace cost- Optimise fixed cost i.e. investment in buildings/facilities(keep in mind that rent is also a compensation for capital employed, same goes for financial leasing)
- Optimise variable i.e. ongoing costs
▪ Stimulate innovation- Stimulate individual and collective creativity- Enable explicit and implicit knowledge and idea sharing
▪ Control risks- Assess risks associated with all elements of real estate and facilities – technical, functional, developmental, operational, location, compliance, etc.- Manage risk portofolio for optimal probability/impact results and costs (financial and non-financial)
Ten Real Estate & Facility Management (CREFM) strategies / 2
11
▪ Increase employee engagement- Design and operate to meet work environment requirements and needs of employees, resulting in positive attitudes and emotions- Relate such a positive emotional state to involvement and input in individual and group work
▪ Contribute to sustainabilityRegarding building and facility design, construction and operation – protect, conserve and restore –- natural environment- natural resources- human (long-term) holistic health and well-being- material goods
▪ Optimise financial structure- Assist finance function in employing capital according to corporate policies (which may change), involving outright ownership, leasing (according tonational and international financial standards and requirements) or rent
▪ Support culture and corporate branding- Use, where appropriate, corporate real estate and facility design to support employee behavior / corporate culture- Employ real estate design to influence and affirm the image of the organisation aligned with the corporate brand
▪ Increase real estate value- For owned real estate – locate, design and operate it with an optimal balance sheet valuation and an eventual optimal sales price in mind
Seven universal principles for sucessful Facility ManagementFM principles (GEFMA) 1/2
12
1. Customer / Service OrientationThe Facility Manager and his internal and/or external Coworkers have a clear Service Provider self-concept and maintaina principled service culture. They know and understand the requirements of their customers and they strive to fulfill orsurpass these.
2. Process OrientiationThe FM Service Providers plan and control their processes. Responsibility for resource provision and for work executionand supervision always lie in one hand.
3. Product (Result) OrientationThe customer (User / Contract Partner) judges sucess of the Facility Management unit by its results and leaves theService Providers as much room as possible in applying their Facility Processes.
We should actually look beyond „Result“ to Outcome = which benefits have the users and stakeholdersreceived
Seven universal principles for sucessful Facility ManagementFM principles (GEFMA) 2/2
13
4. Life Cycle OrientationFacility Management spans the whole life cycle of facilities. The causalities among the facilities‘ life cycle phases arerecognized and considered in planning to optimize the sustainable succes of the business.
5. Holistic approachServices within a Facility Management system are planned and controlled with their interdependencies in a way whichsecures a total optimum for the customer and not a suboptimum for one area at the cost of others.
6. Market OrientationThere are clear customer-vendor relationships on the basis of Service Level Agreements (SLA) and invoicing, also forrelationships within one company.
7. PartnershipTreating each other as partners facilitates the smooth deployment of Facility Management‘s support processesinterwoven with the User‘s core processes.
3 key drivers of productivity in the workplace – according to 200 CRE managers
14
Results
86% 85%
50%
42%
19%
11%6% 3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Appropriate toolsand technology
Leadership anddirection
Flexibleworkspace that
enablescollaboration and
focus
Project and skill-set alignment
Financialincentives
Employeeamenities -
cafeteria, fitnesscenter, incentive
programs
Negativerepercussions,
fear of failure, jobinsecurity
Other, pleasespecify
17%
22%
28%
55%
62%
82%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Other, please specify
Recordable instances
Work order completion
FM performance to budget
Project scheduling and budget accuracy
Total cost of occupancy
49%
51%
Yes No
Do organizations link core business productivity measures with Real Estate/Facility Management performance measures? – HOW?
15
Results
Which CREFM performance drivers are key? Which levers work best?
16
▪ Increase value of assets
Real Estate Strategies
▪ Obtain current valuations of facilities/ Select suitable locations▪ Manage risk associated with properties▪ Make lease/purchase decision on a facility by facility basis▪ Redevelop obsolete properties
▪ Select locations that attract customers/ Provide space that attracts employees▪ Make symbolic statement through design and location▪ Create workplaces that support the environment and workers▪ Provide environment that supports productivity
▪ Develop usability of the workplaces▪ Design facilities that allow innovative processes▪ Emphasize knowledge work settings▪ Allow users to participate in design phase
▪ Seek locations convenient to employees/ Provide pleasant working environment▪ Provide functional workplace▪ Provide desired amenities▪ Respond quickly to real estate requests
▪ Maintain facilities to accommodate optimal operations▪ Provide environment that enhances productivity▪ Choose convenient layouts and locations for providers▪ Design facilities that improve the creation and delivery of products▪ Choose convenient locations for employees in separate buildings
▪ Choose leasing instead of owning/ Negotiate short - term leases▪ Create flexible workplace solutions▪ Favour multiple use facilities▪ Select serviced offices
▪ Minimize acquisition and financing costs/ Minimize operating expenses▪ Create economies of scale in acquisitions/ Use workplaces more efficiently▪ Conduct routine maintenance▪ Balance between outsourced and in-house services▪ Act as a control mechanism/ Utilize government incentives▪ Establish workplace standards
Productivitygrowth
Revenuegrowth
Core business
performance
Real estate performance drivers Real estate performance levers
▪ Reduce environmental impact
▪ Increase innovations
▪ Increase employee satisfaction
▪ Increase productivity
▪ Increase flexibility
▪ Reduce Cost
Ca. 50 proven REFM-related cost levers are availableCost (and waste!) reducing levers
17
28 Capacity evaluation
29. Level of administrative tasks
30. Reduction of duplication of
work
31. Definition of interfaces
32. Evaluation of service scope
33. Evaluation of competencies
34. Identification of process
breaks
35. Defined responsibilities
36. Management mechanisms
37. Reporting
38. Internal Benchmarking
39. Reduction of repeated
process steps; short decision
making processes
40. IT-costs
• Consideration of all real estate costs
• Comprehensive cost-reduction by reviewing more than
50 leverages per property
• Individual appraisal with regard to potentials and
feasibility
• Identification of Quick Wins
Cost Levers
1. Standardization
Service Levels
2. Reduction Service Levels
3. Price negotiations
4. New tender offers
5. Service provider bundling
6. Introduction of standardized
contracts
7. Outsourcing
8. Management of service
providers
9. Bonus/ Malus- systems for
external mngt,
10. Quality inspection and defining
Malus-regulations
11. Renegotiation
12. Effective maintenance strategy
13. Consumption management
14. Retrofitting of the property
15. Costs of utilities
16. Bundling of purchases
17. Form of contract
18. Lease term/ Extension
19. Reduction of the rent
20. Additional services
21. Space optimization
22. Relocation
23. Rate of internal services
24. Fixtures
25. Rent-free periods
26. Space reduction
27. Evaluation rent vs. ownership
FM-Costs Utilities Rental costs Organizational costs
Appraisal leverages
41. Portfolio adjustments
42. Space optimization
43. Sale/ relocation
44. Extension
45. Ownership vs. rents
46. Off-Balance -strategies
47. Optimization of financing
48. Tax optimization
Costs of equity capital
44%
30%
13%
11%
1% 1%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
10% 20% 30% Less than 5% 40% Over 40%
More than two thirds of FMs estimate workplace productivity improvement potential between 10 and 20%
18
Benchmark vs. actual analysis led to savings against benchmarkActual example, German global company
19
Building Electrical Systems
General Building Maintenance/Repair
CleaningServices General
Achieved Savings
1.6
1.4
3.5
2011 actual spend(Baseline)
8.0
1.7
2.2
4.1
-1.4
(-18%)6.6
Savings validation
The estimated saving are calculated and validated against site benchmarks
Savings through CREM initiatives total up to 8-14% of opexActual example, industrial client with 120 sites in Europe
20
20
Value Delivery Typical Value Delivery Curve
▪ Highest savings in Year 1: 10% - 12%
▪ Additional savings of 2% year 2 and 3
▪ Contract duration: 3 + 1 + 1
506.821
589.327
20142013
11.787
(2%)
2012
11.787
(2%)
2011
58.933
(10%)
2010
FM + E&S spend, Baseline 2009
If there is one thing you should focus on when you want to improve Value Added –which is it?
workplace
21
The five stages of Real Estate & Facility Management (REFM) maturity
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology model for Real Estate & Facility Management
22
• BUs as process driver
• RE costs absorbed as corporate G&A
• Reactive
• Traditional cost control standards
• BUs pay depreciation
• Reactive
• Cost and usage standards
• BUs pay (opportunity)
• Proactive
• Benchmarking
• Outsourcing alliance
• RE becomes profit center
• BUs pay market rent
• CREM
• Anticipating and measuring business trends
• Business strategy drives RE decision
• Serving stakeholders
• BUs must justify market rentsCaretaker
Controller
Dealmaker
Entrepreneur
Business strategists
Technical Analytic Problem solving Business planning Strategic
Market orientation
Engineering buildings Minimizing building cost Standardizing building usage
Matching market options
Integrated market orientation
Hospitals are leaving Value Added on the table –by overemphasizing self-delivery in Facility management
23
Study of more than 100 German hospitals shows: Outsourcing is neglectedboth for operations and maintenance
Single Facility Service Tendering is still the prevailing method in hospitals
24
The Value Added principleis ignored in Hospital FM
In soft services, outsourcing is common – but still for single services – no Value Added
25
Reinigung (innen/außen) und Wäscherei – Fremdvergaben weitestgehend
umgesetzt! Potenzial für die weiteren Leistungsbereiche bei 30-50%!
Heterogener Modell-Mix – Einzelvergabe nach wie vor noch weit verbreitet
Motives for Outsourcing: Flexibility strongest
26
Biggest risk seen in Outsourcing: 1. Hyginie 2. Utilities supply 3. Facility availability
27
Outsourcing risk – hyginie
28
Eintrittswahrscheinlichkeit und Auswirkungen bei einer
„Servicegesellschaft“ am geringsten!
Outsourcing risk – facility availability
29
Eintrittswahrscheinlichkeit und Auswirkungen bei einer „Servicegesellschaft“ und „Gesamtvergabe“
am geringsten!
Relations between operator model risks and degree of outsoucing
30
Risk assessment of Total Outsoucing and captive FM company
31
Operator model risk overview
32
Risk valuation of abstract operator models vs. actual in-house situation „incongruent“
33
Ergebnis der Risikobewertung der Betreibermodelle und Status-Quo nicht
kongruent! Realität vs. Vision?!
Counclusion and outlook for CREFM in hospitals
34
▪ Single Facility Service tenders are still the dominating model in hospitals
▪ Risk potenzial of a given operator model reduces with -
• Increased bundling of Facility Services
• Increased influence of the hospital management on the operator
• Decreasing number of Facility Service providers
▪ Cost pressure vs. Risk potential?
▪ Single service tender vs. …. No, not total FM provider, but Facility Service company!
▪ Short-sighted cost thinking vs. Value Added management!
So why is nothing chaningin practice?
The ROI model co-developed by Peter Prischl measures speed and Economic Value Added (EVA) of improvement actions within the Facility Management function
35
Legend:
4. Vacancy17. Real Estate Portfolio Management7. Transparency (Cost, clarity,
visualisation)15. Transaction support: More speed,
more detail, less uncertainty, higher attractiveness
10. Service desk2. Cleaning3. Efficiency (room booking)12. Contract management1. Maintenance (Condition, reasons,
spare parts)8. Moves11. Security and Access Management6. Standardisation13.Procurement and outsourcing16. Energy management
36
BACKUP
Context of the Organization
• External & Internal Issues
• Interested Party Requirements
• Establish Scope
• Document Scope
• FM Management System
Leadership
• Leadership & Commitment
• Establish FM Policy
• Communicate FM Policy
• Relevant Roles
• Responsibility & Authority
Support
• ID & Secure Resources
• Source & Monitor
• Competencies
• Awareness
• Communications
• Information Required
Performance Evaluation
• Scope of Monitoring
• Monitoring Means & Methods
• Documented Results
• Evaluate Performance
• Performance Audits
• Top Management Review
• Communicate / Act on Results
Planning
• Risks & Opportunities
• Plan / Address Risks
• Requirements of Stakeholders
• FM Objectives
• Implementation Plan
• Planning Horizons
Operation
• Processes
• Change Control
• Control Processes
• Customer Relationships
• Integrate Service Delivery
Improvement
• Nonconformity
• Corrective Actions
• Proactive Measures
• Gap Analysis
• Continually ImproveSource: ISO TC 267
37
The typical projekt-scope – What is often our task in the project?(Excerpt)
38
Optimisation of Rental Contracts− Reviewing lease contracts / break options− Ownership vs. Rental− Standardisation of rental contracts− Continuous lease management− Reduce vacancies
Project management− Execute projects within budget frame− Construction projects/Manage acquisition and sale− Integration of Knowhow during the planning
Avoiding risks− Define and assign operator responsibilities− Meet production requirements− Central safety and fire protection regulations− Supervision of insurances
Defining portfolio strategy− Linkage to core business requirements− Portfolio adjustment / off balance strategies− Sales & Relocation− Optimize sites− Optimization of financing
Optimisation of FM-Costs− Define standards− Control of qualities and maintenance− Reduce costs by benchmarking
Maintenance− Managing maintenance backlog− Preventive Maintenance− Reactive Maintenance − Introduction of standards
Define Service provider strategy − Define in-house service depth− Bundle/tender of service providers− Standardisation/optimisation of contractual design− Reviewing and renegotiation of existing contracts− Service Provider management and controlling
Consumption − Energy Saving Measures− SLA / KPI definition− Strengthening cost awareness (user)− Introduction of standards (security, cleaning, etc.)− Control of qualities and maintenance
Reduction of Costs Optimisation of Assets
Purchasing Production FM/RE … Production Plots Buildings …
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
Moderator: Mr. Peter Prischl - Managing Director, Drees & Sommer International
• Eng. Sultan Alkhuraissi – General Manager for Operations & Maintenance, Royal Commission in Jubail
• Mr. Ali Manajem – Performance Improvement Consultant, Saudi Aramco
• Eng. Naif Al-Trad – Executive Director Hospital Operations, King Fahad Specialist Hospital
• Dr. Abdulaziz Saud Almohassen – Assistant Professor (Building Engineering Dept.), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
• Eng. Mohammed Salim Patel – Facility Management Director, Tadbeir Real Estate Company
PANEL DISCUSSION
THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS & PARTNERS
Event Sponsors
Supporting Partners