evaluation of the incidental solitary liver...

39
1 Lewis R. Roberts, PhD, FAASLD Evaluation of the Incidental Solitary Liver Lesion Postgraduate Course: Challenges in Management of Common Liver Diseases 347

Upload: vukien

Post on 22-May-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Lewis R. Roberts, PhD, FAASLD

Evaluation of the Incidental

Solitary Liver Lesion

Postgraduate Course:

Challenges in Management of Common Liver Diseases

347

© 2016 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

WWW.AASLD.ORG 2

Questions for Reviewers:

1. Is it ok to leave out simple cyst

and abscess slides – 23,24,25?

2. Are LIRADS slides needed –

30,31?

3. Any other suggested changes?

348

A 39 year old female with a 2 cm solitary lesion

on ultrasound and normal liver chemistries

Key Questions/Content Focus:

• Present an algorithm for investigation of

incidental solitary solid liver lesions.

• How does one differentiate a benign from a

malignant lesion?

• Do adenomas and focal nodular hyperplasia

need to be followed and if so, how? © 2016 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

WWW.AASLD.ORG 3

Case

349

© 2016 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

WWW.AASLD.ORG 4

Objectives

• Clinical classification of liver masses

• Evaluation of liver mass lesions

• Common benign mass lesions • Clinical features • Imaging characteristics • Optimal management

• Common malignant mass lesions • Hepatocellular Carcinoma • Cholangiocarcinoma • Metastases from other Primary Sites

350

© 2016 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

WWW.AASLD.ORG 5

Three Categories of Liver Masses

1. Benign lesions usually requiring no further intervention

2. Benign lesions requiring further investigation and therapy

3. Malignant lesions requiring appropriate management

351

© 2016 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

WWW.AASLD.ORG 6

1. Benign lesions usually requiring no further intervention

• Cavernous hemangioma

• Focal nodular hyperplasia

• Simple cyst

• Focal fatty change or sparing

352

© 2016 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

WWW.AASLD.ORG 7

2. Benign lesions requiring further

investigation and therapy

• Hepatic adenoma and adenomatosis

• Biliary cystadenoma

• Hepatic abscess – pyogenic or amebic

• Echinococcal cyst

• Granulomatous inflammation

• Inflammatory pseudotumor

353

© 2016 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

WWW.AASLD.ORG 8

3. Malignant lesions requiring appropriate

management

• Metastases from other primary sites

• Hepatocellular carcinoma

• Cholangiocarcinoma

• Biliary cystadenocarcinoma

• Lymphoma

• Hepatic angiosarcoma

354

© 2016 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

WWW.AASLD.ORG 9

Clinical Approach to Liver Mass Lesions

• Symptoms

• Physical examination

• Laboratory studies

• Imaging characteristics: Ultrasound, CT,

MRI (especially with newer hepatobiliary

contrast agents)

• Need for biopsy

• Optimal management 355

© 2016 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

WWW.AASLD.ORG 10

356

Phasic Vascular Perfusion of the Liver

357

Cavernous Hemangioma: Histology

Large hemangiomas

may have areas of

thrombosis, scarring,

and calcification

Network of vascular spaces separated by thin, fibrous stroma

358

Cavernous Hemangioma

359

Pre-contrast

Arterial phase

Venous phase

Peripheral nodular arterial phase enhancement,

with fill-in to the center in the venous phase

45 y o F with a Liver Mass

360

Focal Nodular Hyperplasia: Histology

• Benign reaction to congenital arterial malformation

• Vascular stellate scar and septal fibrosis

• Polyclonal hepatocytes and functioning bile ductules

• Aspirates indistinguishable from adenoma 361

MRI of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia

362

Sodium Gadoxetate MRI for

Distinguishing FNH from Adenoma

• Brightly enhancing in arterial phase

• Homogeneous enhancement with central scar

• Isointense in portal venous phase

• Retained intensity in the hepatobiliary phase supports the diagnosis of FNH

Arterial Portal Venous Hepatobiliary

363

Histopathology of Adenoma

Monoclonal hepatocytes

Prominent “naked” arteries

No normal portal tracts or bile ducts

Adenoma

364

β-catenin Exon 3 Mutated Adenomas

have Higher Risk of Malignancy

Normal Membrane

Staining

Positive Nuclear

Staining 365

MRI of Hepatic Adenoma

366

Gadobenate Dimeglumine MRI for

Distinguishing FNH from Adenoma

• Heterogeneous arterially enhancing mass • Isointense in portal venous phase • Decreased intensity in the hepatobiliary

phase suggests HNF1A mutated adenoma • Inflammatory and β-catenin mutated

adenomas may retain contrast

Arterial Portal Venous Hepatobiliary

367

Management of Hepatic Adenomas

• Follow up 6 mo, q 1 yr x 5 yrs, then q 2 yrs

• High Risk: Resect

• Lesions ≥ 5 cm (or increasing size)

• Hemorrhage

• Male Gender (increased malignant risk)

• β-Catenin mutated adenomas

• Older females with no history of OCP use

• Low Risk: Stop OCPs, lose weight

• Young Females, lesions < 5 cm on OCP

• Follow w US q 6-12 weeks during pregnancy

• Alternatives to Resection: RFA, embolization 368

Imaging Characteristics of Liver Cysts

Ultrasound

• Best test

• No internal echoes

• No flow on color flow

or duplex Doppler

• Through transmission

• Well-defined posterior

walls

• May have thin

echogenic septa 369

Symptomatic Cyst in a 72 y o F with Painless Jaundice and Leg Edema

Presentation

1 year after cyst aspiration

& EtOH sclerosis 2 years later

370

Pyogenic Liver Abscess

• Rupture or leak of

bile duct or bowel

• Biliary stenting,

instrumentation, or

chemoembolization

• Increased risk in

diabetes mellitus

• Biliary: enteric gram

-ves & enterococci

• Other sites: mixed

aerobic & anaerobic

41 yo F with new diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis and liver mass

371

Imaging Characteristics of Focal Fat:

65 y o Woman Referred for Presumed

Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma

Ultrasound Hyperechoic

T1 Weighted In & Out of Phase

3 Month Follow-Up

372

© 2016 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

WWW.AASLD.ORG 27

• Epidemiology:

• Fatty liver is increasingly common

• Focal fatty infiltration looks like a mass

• Also focal sparing in diffuse fatty infiltration

• Associations:

• Obesity

• Diabetes mellitus

• High alcohol consumption

• Altered metabolism due to chemotherapy

Focal Fat or Fat Sparing

373

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

374

Non-Invasive Diagnosis: Arterial Enhancement, Venous Washout, Capsule and Threshold Growth

Arterial

Portal

Late venous phase 375

LIRADS System for HCC Diagnosis

Threshold Growth

376

© 2016 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

WWW.AASLD.ORG 31

Lesion

Characteristics

LIRADS System for HCC Diagnosis

Schema

377

20 year old F with Long History of Vague Symptoms and Large Liver Mass

Fibrolamellar Subtype of HCC

Arterial phase Portal phase

• Young females

• Lymph node metastases

• Aggressive surgery recommended

• DNAJB1-PRKACA Chimeric Transcripts 378

Intrahepatic CCA

Perihilar CCA

Distal CCA

Image Courtesy of Dr. Gregory Gores

Gall bladder

Cystic duct

Pancreas

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA)

Small

intestine

Liver

Bile duct

379

Imaging of Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

380

Imaging and Pathology of CCA

Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Histopathology Peripheral

Enhancement

381

© 2016 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

WWW.AASLD.ORG 36

Case

A 39 year old female with a 2 cm solitary lesion

on ultrasound and normal liver chemistries

Key Questions/Content Focus:

• Present an algorithm for investigation of

incidental solitary solid liver lesions.

• How does one differentiate a benign from a

malignant lesion? Imaging and/or biopsy

• Do adenomas and focal nodular hyperplasia

need to be followed and if so, how? Follow

adenomas – 6 mo, q 1 yr x 5 yrs, then q 2 yr 382

© 2016 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

WWW.AASLD.ORG 37

Summary

• History, physical, and laboratory tests are important in the evaluation of liver masses

• Imaging techniques allow distinction between most benign and malignant liver masses

• Repeat imaging after an interval or biopsy when the diagnosis remains uncertain

• The commonest conundrum is the distinction between FNH and adenoma

• Focal fat or sparing in a fatty liver frequently masquerade as a mass

• HCCs show distinct differences from adenocarcinomas such as cholangiocarcinoma

383

© 2016 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

WWW.AASLD.ORG 38

Thank You for Your Attention!

384

© 2016 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

WWW.AASLD.ORG 39

Questions for Reviewers:

1. Is it ok to leave out simple cyst

and abscess slides – 23,24,25?

2. Are LIRADS slides needed –

30,31?

3. Any other suggested changes?

385