evaluation of hydrodynamic coefficients on riser floaters ... · riser sector: diameter 0.2755 m...
TRANSCRIPT
Evaluation of hydrodynamic coefficients on riser floaters using CFD Erico Santos, Pedro Mendes, Bruno Luna – PETROBRAS (CENPES/PDEP/TDUT)
Ricardo Damian – ESSS
AGENDA
• MOTIVATION
• PROCEADURE OVERVIEW
• RISER GLOBAL ANALYSIS
• CFX SIMULATION
• PARAMETER ESTIMATION PROCEDURE
• PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS
• CFD RESULTS
• HYDRODYNAMIC PARAMETERS RESULTS
• CONCLUSIONS & NEXT STEPS
PROCEADURE OVERVIEW
Characterization
• Object
• Amplitude
• Period
• Current
CFD
• Domain
• Mesh
• Parametric Setup
• Export Forces
Estimation
• Morison Model
• Drag (Re, Direction)
• Added Mass (Re, Direction)
Global Analysis
RISER GLOBAL ANALYSIS
• Waves
• Current
• Offset
• Soil
• Floatings
• Riser Properties
• Fluid
– Internal
– external
FLUID FORCES
• Morison´s Equation
– Inertia: linear function of structural acceleration
– Added mass: proportional to the fluid acceleration
– Drag: proportional to the relative velocity between fluid and structure
MOTION CHARACTERIZATION
-0,4
-0,3
-0,2
-0,1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
tempo [s]
Am
plitu
de
XL
YL
ZL
Z
X
CFD DOMAIN
Riser Sector:
Diameter 0.2755 m
Cylindrical Floaters:
Diameter 1.6 m
Length 1.8 m
Spacing 4.2 m
Corner Rounding 0.1 m
Cylindrical Domain:
Diameter 20 m
Length 22.2 m
CFD MESH
ANSYS Meshing (Workbench)
Global Sizing:
Min Size 0.05 m
Max Size 2.0 m
Growth Ration 1.1
Curvature Sensitive
Riser & Floaters:
Max Size 0.1 m
10 Prismatic Layers
Growth Ration 1.25
Transition Ratio 0.6
Turbulence:
SST Model
Y+ ≈ 100
CFD SETUP – BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
Transient Setup
Moving Domain
Rigid Mesh Motion
Farfield:
CFX Opening
Moving Boundary
Velocity
Current Conditions
Turbulence
5% Intensity
Length Scale => L Floater
Riser & Floaters:
Moving Wall
Stationary Setup
Farfield:
CFX Opening
Velocity
Current Conditions
Turbulence
5% Intensity
Length Scale => L Floater
Riser & Floaters:
Wall
CFD SETUP – RISER/FLOATER MOTION
Typical Motion Behavior
Period
Ocean Wave Motion
12.5 s chosen
Amplitude
≈ Floater Diameter / 10
0.16 m chosen
Harmonic Motion chosen
CFD SETUP – PARAMETERIZATION
Current Parameters
Direction (Horizontal Angle)
Reynolds Number
Characteristic Length
Floater Diameter
U, V, W, ρ & µ
Motion Parameters
Amplitude
Orientation (i, j , k)
Period
Rigid Mesh Motion
Monitor Points
Total Force (pressure + shear)
Central Floater
X, Y, Z directions
PARAMETER ESTIMATION PROCEDURE
CFD Model
Monitor Points
Forces along time
Position
Velocity
Acceleration
Morison Equation
Minimum Square Method
Optimization Algorithm
Minimize Sum of the Quadratic Error
• For the tested motion, added mass is the dominant force – The amplitude and period produces small velocities
• The estimation of drag and added mass coefficients in the same time isn't precise for the drag
• The added mass coefficient doesn't depend on the current (speed or direction)
• Drag coefficient can be easily obtained with stationary runs
• New strategy established:
PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS
Stationary CFD for all current direction
Drag coefficient estimation
Single Transient CFD w/ motion & no
current
Added Mass coefficient estimation
CFD RESULTS
N – 90° NE – 45°
N – 22.5° E – 0°
NNE – 67.5°
Vortex core isosurface colored with velocity
• A systematic CFD procedure for hydrodynamic coefficient estimation of moving submerged bodies was established
• Stationary runs are used for drag estimation according to the current direction
• A single transient run with body motion is used for added mass estimation
• Only the drag coefficient depends on current direction
• The CFD setup parameterization saves user´s time
• Next steps:
– To automate the parameter estimation step
– To perform similar analysis to complex bodies (manifold, anchor, subsea separator, etc)
CONCLUSIONS & NEXT STEPS