evaluation model
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A I L E E N H . B A N A G U A SP H . D . S t u d e n t
C a v i t e S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y( E M G T. 3 5 5 )
![Page 2: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
EVALUATION ModelEMGT.355
(Educational Testing Measurement and Program Evaluation)
![Page 3: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Evaluation Models 1. 4-Level Model (Kirkpatrick) 2. Goals-Free Evaluation (Scriven) 3. System Approach (Bushnell
4. Utilization Program (Patton) 5. Management Oriented, C. I. P. P.(Daniel L.
Stufflebeam; 1969 )
6. Connoisseurship (Elliot Eisner; 1975) 7. Stake responsive ( Robert E.Stake;1967)
![Page 5: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Stufflebeams' CIPP Model(Daniel L.Stufflebeam)
![Page 6: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
?Stufflebeam BiographyDaniel Leroy Stufflebeam, education
educator
Born in Waverly, Iowa, September 19, 1936
BA, State University Iowa, 1958
MS, Purdue University, 1962,
Ph D, 1964; University of Wisconsin
1965,
![Page 7: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Stufflebeams' CIPP Model
describes the "context" in which an innovation occurs, the
"inputs" of the innovation, the formative "processes" occurring, and the summative "products" or
outcomes. (See A Design for Evaluation, Nova)
![Page 8: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Stufflebeam
wrote that evaluation is the 'process of delineating, obtaining, and providing
useful information for judging decision alternatives."
![Page 9: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
SystemActivities
Evaluation3.
1.
2.
General Evaluation Model
Decisions
![Page 10: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
C.I.P.P. Model?
Context - to determine objectives
Input - to determine program design
Process - to control program operations
Product -to judge and react to program
attainments
![Page 11: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The CIPP model suggests the following evaluations steps: 1) Focus the goals of the evaluation; 2) Outline an information collection process; 3) Analyze information; 4) Report information.
In addition, the CIPP model provides for a very detailed costing out of the administration of the evaluation.
![Page 12: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
This evaluation is a client oriented evaluation. Its intention is to help clients make decisions. Thus the structure of the evaluation is important. The literature on decision making is a relevant literature.
![Page 13: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
1. Does the client truly want a wide list of alternative choices or does the client want to stick to familiar solutions to issues and problems?
2. Does the client want to pay for the process of estimating or modeling the costs of different approaches?
![Page 14: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The CIPP is a very useful approach for a c l ient that wants a rat ional analysis of needs. I t tends to be an expensive process because
i t is qui te quant i tat ive in nature, of ten examining the relat ive benef i ts associated
with di fferent al ternat ive choices.
-End-
![Page 15: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Connoisseurship Model
(Elliot Eisner, 1975)
![Page 16: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Elliot W. Eisner
![Page 17: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
He has made a significant contribution to our appreciation of the educational process. He is particularly known for his work in arts education, curriculum studies, and educational evaluation. However, much of what he has to say has a resonance for a far wider readership. Among his most noted works are The Educational Imagination (1979, 1985, 1994) - an exploration of the design and evaluation of curriculum programmes);
![Page 18: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The Art of Educational Evaluation (1985) - a collection of essays covering key aspects of his earlier work; Cognition and Curriculum (1994) - an examination of the mind and representation); and The Enlightened Eye (1991, 1998) - the extension of his thinking to qualitative research into education). He also made an important contribution to the school reform debate in North America especially through his book.
![Page 19: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Connoisseurship Evaluation
(Elliot Eisner)
Expert in a f ield of study estimating the worth of a new innovation. Obvious
biases and threats to validity exist. (See Program Evaluation, Venedam).
![Page 20: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Connoisseurship Model
(Elliot Eisner, 1975)
. This evaluation approach uti l izes the concept of the connoisseur as an
evaluator who enters an organization and serves as a crit ic of the program
under review.
![Page 21: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Elliot W. Eisner on
Connoisseurship Evaluation Model
![Page 22: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Connoisseurship is the art of appreciation. It can be
displayed in any realm in which the character, import, or value
of objects, situations, and performances is distributed and variable, including educational
practice. (Eisner 1998: 63)
![Page 23: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
word connoisseurship comes from the
Latin cognoscere, to know (Eisner 1998: 6).
![Page 24: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
It involves the ability to see, not merely to look. To do this
we have to develop the ability to name and
appreciate the different dimensions of situations and
experiences, and the way they relate one to another.
![Page 25: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Connoisseurship is something that needs
to be worked at. Educators need to become something
more than connoisseurs.
![Page 26: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Responsive Evaluation model
(Robert E. Stake 1967)
![Page 27: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
R e s p o n s i v e e v a l u a t i o n
- i s a n a l t e r n a t i v e . I t i s e v a l u a t i o n b a s e d o n w h a t p e o p l e d o n a t u r a l l y t o e v a l u a t e t h i n g s : t h e y o b s e r v e a n d r e a c t .
![Page 28: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
RESPOSIVE EVALUATION
1. Orients more directly to program activities than to program intents.2. Respond to audience requirements for information.3. The different value-perspectives of the people at hand are referred to in reporting the success and failure of the program.
![Page 29: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Responsive evaluations
-require planning and structure;
but they rely l i tt le on formal statements
and abstract representations, e.g., f low
charts, test scores. Statements of
objectives, hypotheses.
![Page 30: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Egon Guba and Yvonna Lincoln (1989) rely on
Stake’sresponsive evaluation
![Page 31: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Four
Generations of
Historical
Development of
Stake
Responsive model
Measurement
Description
Judgment
Negotiation
Four Generation in Histori
cal Development
in Stake
Responsive
Evaluation
![Page 32: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
In a responsiveevaluation stakeholders should
actively participate in theevaluation process; they are involved in the formulation of
questions, the selection of participants and the
interpretationof findings (Greene, 1997).
![Page 33: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Case Example:
Traditionally music and dance are considered to be performance arts. Yet, there are those who have compared dance and music with top-sport. Hans van Maanen, a famous Dutch horeographer, even devoted a ballet to this theme (Schaik, 1997).
![Page 34: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
There is, for example, no team of (para-) medical experts to assist dancers and musicians. Due to the lack of resources and the dependency of dancers on the choreographer—he is the one who chooses the cast— dancers feel obliged to go on, evening after evening, even if they suffer from injuries. Pain is accepted as an inevitable part of dancing. Musicians also experience the pressure to perform despite health problems.
![Page 35: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
The lack of attention paid to the prevention of injuries and health related problems in the professional practice of dancers and musicians does not differ from what is going on in the schools. Until recently no systematic attention was paid to the health condition of dance or music students.
![Page 36: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Lately and gradually this is changing (Jowitt et al., 2001). In 1990 the Dance Academy of the Higher School for the Arts in msterdam formed a special department within the school for health problems. This department developed an injury prevention program.
![Page 37: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Program Description: Injury PreventionEvaluators identified three groups of stakeholders:students, teachers and medical experts.
![Page 38: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Findings :
The interviews and conversations with students and teachers revealed that an injury is not only a physical problem, but that it affects the person’s whole well-being. Getting an injury is a dramatic episode in the l ives of students and evokes intense feelings and emotions. Students often start at a very young age with a disciplined and monomaniac training program to work on their career.
![Page 39: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Their identity and future is directly connected with dance or music, and health problems are experienced as a threat to their identity and as long as possible denied. The injury evokes feelings of uncertainty, fear and powerlessness.
![Page 40: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
I t showed that injury prevention is not only a matter of a lack of medical knowledge about r isks, but related to human aspirations and fears, social interactions and exclusion and the organizational culture. Injury prevention only works if this complex context is taken into account. Responsive evaluation gives voice to persons otherwise not heard, in this case the students. Giving voice meant creating a safe space for students to talk about their experiences and concerns..
![Page 41: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
![Page 42: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Thank you listening and for your active participation….
![Page 43: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
1. Delineating - focusing the requirements for information to be collected through specifying, defining and explicating
Back
![Page 44: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
2. Obtaining
- making information available through processes such as collecting, organizing and analyzing and through means such as statistics and measurement back
![Page 45: Evaluation model](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070509/58a60fc41a28ab57488b45d9/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
3. Providing
- fitting together into systems or sub-systems that best serve the needs or purposes of the evaluation
back