evaluation 0500311
DESCRIPTION
Evaluation report for yr 2 Study Day 2, 5 March 2011TRANSCRIPT
Evaluation of Study Day5 March 2011
Based on 85 responses
Faculty of Education, Sport and Travel
PGCE/Certificate in Education (Post-Compulsory Education)
Q1 n
Very 28.9% 24
Quite 48.2% 40
A little 16.9% 14
No 3.6% 3
Q2Very 45.8% 38
Quite 34.9% 29A little 15.7% 13
No 2.4% 2
Write-in comments on lecture
• Not sure how to use lecture info,
• Amazed some did not get KE's position,
• KE could have promoted own view more,
• KE a refreshing voice in today's world,
• Balanced view of topic,
• Not clear what topic was,
Q3Very 32.5% 27
Quite 31.3% 26A little 16.9% 14
No 12.0% 10
Write-in comments on “What next?”
• What next covered before,
• What next more for PGCE, (2)
• MA stuff irrelevant,
Q4Very 37.3% 31
Quite 34.9% 29A little 14.5% 12
No 9.6% 8
Write-in comments on technology session
• Should be hands on
• Needs more time (several)
• Great from people like us (i.e. student contributions)
• Shame ICT resources limited
• Purpose of tech session not clear
Q5Very useful 9.6% 8
Quite useful 61.4% 51Not at all useful 24.1% 20
No answer 3.6% 3
Write in comments on Interest Groups
• No feedback
• Have more specific tasks
• more lectures, less Igs
• make_forum_required
• lacked_continuity,
• too small
• Most effective work on resources
• A combined responsibility
• not appropriate
• need more structure (several)
Q6
A lot? 8.4% 7
Some? 43.4% 36
A little? 41.0% 34
Not at all? 7.2% 6
Q7Plenaries 48.2% 40
Interest groups 19.3% 16Networking 22.9% 19
Other 2.4% 2
Q8 nPlenaries 12.0% 10
Interest groups 49.4% 41Networking 20.5% 17
Other 2.4% 2
Write-in general comments
• Most useful study day (several)
• All useful (2)
• Need to share,
• Provision for disabled poor,
• Only Sue C useful, ,
• Not enough practical tips,
• Sorry missed Coffield,