evaluating today’s landscape multifunctionality and...
TRANSCRIPT
Evaluating today’s landscape multifunctionalityand providing an alternative future: a normative scenario approach
R. Waldhardt1, M. Bach2, R. Borresch3, L. Breuer2, T. Gottschalk4, H.G. Frede2, S. Gäth5, S. Julich2, W. Köhler6, R. Lange4, M. Krumpholz7, F. Kuhlmann7, S. Mayr4, A. Otte1,
B. Reger1, W. Reiher2, P. Sheridan7, K. Schmitz3, P.M. Schmitz3, D. Simmering1, C. Weist6, S. Witzel7, V. Wolters4, D. Zoerner5
Participating Research Units1 Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning
2 Resource Management3 Agricultural and Development Policy
4 Animal Ecology5 Waste Management and Environmental Research
6 Biometry and Population Genetics7 Agribusiness Management
Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Interdisciplinary Research Centre for BioSystems, Land Use and Nutrition
IALUC Conference at Humboldt-University BerlinApril 9, 2008
Multifunctionality of landscapes
Landscapes are required to maintain multiple environmental / ecological and societal functions■ habitat function (flora, fauna)■ filter function (surface and ground water)■ aesthetic function (natural scenery, cultural heritage)■ …■ production function (food, fodder crops, bioenergy)
However, to date (most) landscapes do not fulfil the requirements of theconcept of multifunctionality.
The degree of multifunctionality is hard to be evaluated as long as ‚multifunctional reference landscapes‘ are being missed.
Designing multifunctional landscapes by means of normative landscapescenarios – ‚that portray futures that should be‘* – may support the evaluationof the current situation.
* Nassauer & Corry (2004): Using normative sceanrios in landscape ecology. – Landsc. Ecol. 19: 343-356.
I. documentation of today‘s land use at the scale of uniformly managed land units
II. detection of functional deficits of today‘s land use considering environmental, social and economic attributes
III. compilation of a catalogue of alternative land uses suitable to minimise thedetected functional deficits
IV. determination of rules for the incorporation of alternative land uses in a normative scenario
V. rule-based modification of today‘s land use pattern in a normative scenario
VI. evaluation of today‘s landscape against the normative scenario (reference) with respect to multifunctionality
an application of the spatially explicit and GIS-based SFB 299 model network ITE²M
Normative scenario approach
Model network ITE²M
talk given by M. Bach:The Integrated Tool for Economic and Ecological Modelling (ITE2M): Assessment of trade-offs in landscape services.
cf. Waldhardt 2006 in Colloquium Geographicum (Bonn)
soil
fauna
flora
water
people‘s perspective
economy
Study area: Water catchment ‚Wetter‘ (Wetterau, Hesse)
Area B
Frankfurt
Hamburg
Munich
Berlin
#
#
#
#
GERMANY
A
Study area
elevation a.s.l. 120 – 250 m
mean annual temperature 9 – 10,5 °C
mean annual rainfall 500 – 650 mm
predominance of fertile and well-drained luvisols
land cover in 2003
total area 16.600 ha
- arable land 52 %
Münzenberg
Intensive arable production (breadbasket of Hesse)
land-use intensity is high with respect to fertilization and pesticide applicationconsidered as an area that does not provide much ‚space for biodiversity’
Habitat of endangered species (e.g., common hamster)
protected by the European flora-fauna habitat directive
Foto: Manfred Sattler
Nature reserves (e.g., riparian habitat network ‚Auenverbund Wetterau‘)
extensively managed grasslandsamongst the most ambitious nature-conservation projects in Hesse
Nature reserve ‚Mittlere Horloffaue‘
Problems arising from land-use intensity of the agricultural matrix
■ fertilizer and pesticide contamination of surface and ground water and terrestrial non-target habitats
■ biodiversity loss
■ enrichment of heavy metals in arable soils
■ soil erosion
■ …
degree of multifunctionality?
I. documentation of today‘s land use at the scale of uniformly managed land units
II. detection of functional deficits of today‘s land use considering environmental, social and economic attributes
III. compilation of a catalogue of alternative land uses suitable to minimise thedetected functional deficits
IV. determination of rules for the incorporation of alternative land uses in a normative scenario
V. rule-based modification of today‘s land use pattern in a normative scenario
VI. evaluation of today‘s landscape against the normative scenario (reference) with respect to multifunctionality
Normative scenario approach
arable landgrasslandforestopen watersettlementsinfrastructureothers
data aggregated for presentation puposes
► common high-resolution GIS-database on land use and site conditionsfor all research partners
I. documentation of today‘s land use at the scale of uniformlymanaged land units
air photo interpretation covering the entire areabased on data from the EU subsidy control system(‚InVeKoS‘) and considering data on nature reservesand other protected areas(conducted by EFTAS Fernerkundung, Münster)
documentation of production systemsbased on local farmer‘s informationand business statistics
consideration of digital site information(e.g., soils, topography)
2006: 6 months
Example: field research on weed vegetation, considering production systemsand site conditions (habitat types)
In 300 plots, only 47 segetal species were recorded, mainly in cultivated fieldmargins.
In contrast, about 150 segetal species are to be expected according to regional floristic databases.
II. detection of functional deficits of today‘s land use consideringenvironmental, social and economic attributes
► disciplinary qualitative and quantitative analysis of landscape attributes
2007: 4-6 months
Example: alternative evaluation of agricultural environmental schemessuitable for weed protection under consideration of the Hessian IntegratedAgricultural Environmental Programme ‚HIAP‘
III. compilation of a catalogue of alternative land uses suitable to minimise the detected functional deficits
► disciplinary ideas for alternative futures
2007: 3 months
interdisciplinary expert discussions on regionally-applicable agriculturalproduction systems and landscape structure, considering
■ a network of extensively cultivated field margins■ enhancement of extensively managed grasslands■ restoration of formerly common fruit orchards (mainly with apple trees)■ alternative crop rotations■ alternative tillage operations■ …
■ regional land rent
IV. determination of rules for the incorporation of alternative land uses in a normative scenario
► interdisciplinary portray of ‚a future that should be‘
2007: 3 months
V. rule-based modification of today‘s land use pattern in a normative scenario
V. rule-based modification of today‘s land use pattern in a normative scenario
► GIS realization of multifunctionality
0 200 400 600 800 1000100Meter ´
LegendeGetreide
Raps
Hackfrüchte (Mais, Rüben, Kartoffeln)
Wiesen und Weiden; Graswege
Gebüsch, Hecke
Straßen und geteerte Wege
base case
0 200 400 600 800 1000100Meter
LegendeGetreide
Raps
Hackfrüchte (
Blühflächen
Wiesen und W
Streuobstwies
Gebüsch, Hec
Straßen und g
Krautsäume
Ackerschonst
´
multifunctional scenario
LegendeGetreide
Raps
Hackfrüchte (Mais, Rüben, Kartoffeln)
Blühflächen
Wiesen und Weiden; Graswege
Streuobstwiesen
Gebüsch, Hecke
Straßen und geteerte Wege
Krautsäume
Ackerschonstreifen
cropsrapeseedmaize, beetroot, potatoeflowering fieldmeadow and pasturefruit orchardhedgeroadflowering marginextensively managed field margin
2007 / 2008: 4 months
34
3
10.5 11.8
base case multifunctional scenario
GEPARD Output: number of breeding bird species
VI. evaluation of today‘s landscape against the normative scenariowith respect to multifunctionality (ITE²M model network anlaysis)
higher number of breeding bird species in multifunctionality scenariounequal distribution of effects
GEPARD Output: Yellowhammer territories
889 1052
0.34 Terr./pixel
0 Terr./pixel
VI. evaluation of today‘s landscape against the normative scenariowith respect to multifunctionality (ITE²M model network anlaysis)
base case multifunctional scenario
higher number of Yellowhammer territories in multifunctionality scenariounequal distribution of effects
ProF Output: number of plant species per km²base case: 206 multifunctional scenario: 255
VI. evaluation of today‘s landscape against the normative scenariowith respect to multifunctionality (ITE²M model network anlaysis)
LegendeGetreide
Raps
Hackfrüchte (Mais, Rüben, Kartoffeln)
Blühflächen
Wiesen und Weiden; Graswege
Streuobstwiesen
Gebüsch, Hecke
Straßen und geteerte Wege
Krautsäume
Ackerschonstreifen
cropsrapeseedmaize, beetroot, potatoeflowering fieldmeadow and pasturefruit orchardhedgeroadflowering marginextensively managed field margin
higher number of plant species at various spatial scales in multifunctionalityscenariounequal distribution of effects
ProLand Output: land rent and direct payments*
VI. evaluation of today‘s landscape against the normative scenariowith respect to multifunctionality (ITE²M model network anlaysis)
ScenarioLand Rent*
in.
Direct Payments
1,000 €Base 9,405 2,899Multifunctionality 8,218 3,052
*land rent total includes direct transfer payments
higher land rent and lower transfer payments in base casehigher share of direct transfer payments in multifuntionality scenario
* as projected for 2013: 302 €
ProLand Output: total land rent
VI. evaluation of today‘s landscape against the normative scenariowith respect to multifunctionality (ITE²M model network anlaysis)
base case multifunctionality scenario
unequal distribution of effects
Breuer L., Reiher W., Pohlert T., Huisman J.A., Weinmann B., Vaché K.B., Bach M., Frede H.G., 2007: Integrated assessment of potential impacts on water and soil related ecosystem services due to the European Common Agricultural Policy. In: Schumann, A., Pahlow, M. (ed.), Reducing the Vulnerability of Societies to Water related Risks at the Basin Scale. IAHS-Publ. 317: 90-95.
Ecosystem services for the CAP and AGENDA land use scenario as derived by ITE2M. Model outputs were standardized [100%].
VI. evaluation of today‘s landscape against the normative scenariowith respect to multifunctionality (ITE²M model network anlaysis)
► disciplinary and integrated quantitative and qualitative evaluation
2008: > 4 months
Advantages and challenges
Designing multifunctional landscapes by means of normative landscape scenariosmay support- the evaluation of the current situation (reference system)- ex-ante impact assessment (reference system)- strategy making and planning (visionary system).
Various alternative futures may be designed that meet multifunctionality criteria.
Spatially-explicit analyses of trade-offs between considered landscape attributes / functions / services are needed for a better understanding of the underlyingprocesses in the human-environment system (landscape).
►distinguish between reality, visions and dreams
This study was carried out as part of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 299.
www.uni-giessen.de/waldhardt www.sfb299.de
Upcoming events:
Symposium ‚Effects of bioenergy production on biodiversity: local to global case studies and scenarios‘ – EURECO-GfOE Conference 2008 – Sept. 2008 –www.eureco-gfoe2008.ufz.de/
Workshop ‚Energiepflanzenanbau - ökologische Folgen für die Landschaft‘ –GfOE Specialist Group Landscape Ecology – May 2008 – www.gfoe.org/
We thank the DFG for financial assistance