evaluating company management

62
07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 1 Evaluating Company Management Presented by: Ty Hughes NAIC DC Chapter

Upload: arlene

Post on 13-Jan-2016

65 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Evaluating Company Management. Presented by: Ty Hughes NAIC DC Chapter. What is NAIC?. National Association of Investors Corporation NAIC teaches individuals how to become successful strategic long-term investors NAIC investors use fundamental analysis to study common stocks Websites: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 1

Evaluating Company Management

Presented by:Ty HughesNAIC DC Chapter

Page 2: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 2

What is NAIC?

National Association of Investors Corporation NAIC teaches individuals how to become

successful strategic long-term investors NAIC investors use fundamental analysis to

study common stocks Websites:

www.better-investing.org www.naicdc.org

Page 3: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 3

NAIC Principles

Invest a fixed amount regularly for the long term

Reinvest all of your earnings Invest only in good quality growth companies Diversify (by company size and by industries)

Page 4: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 4

Measuring Managerial Ability

Objective tests of managerial ability are few and rather unscientific. … The most convincing proof of capable management lies in a superior comparative record over a period of time….

– Graham and Dodd

Page 5: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 5

What To Look For in Management A management that has been tested by

competition in both good and bad times A management whose sales and profits are

expanding at a geometric rate A management that will have stronger and

bigger businesses in five years Beware of management that is riding an

industry wave or product cycle – George Nicholson

Page 6: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 6

Management Report Card

SSG serves as a tool to review skills and quality of company management

How is the management performing? Section 2 of the SSG offers important

insights: Pretax profits margins Return on equity Percent debt to equity (Toolkit and Stock Analyst)

Page 7: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 7

Evaluating Management with the SSG Consistent and increasing growth in revenues

Section 1 of the SSG (Visual Analysis) Consistent and increasing growth in earnings

Section 1 of the SSG (Visual Analysis) Consistent or increasing pre-tax profit margin

Section 2a of the SSG Consistent or increasing return on equity

Section 2b of the SSG

Page 8: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 8

Pre-Tax Profits

Line 2a of the SSG Pre-Tax Profits =

Revenues - Expenses Revenues - Cost of goods Sold - Overhead

Are they stable, rising or falling? How do they compare to competitors or

industry average? What is the future PTP trend likely to be?

Page 9: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 9

Factors that Reduce Profits

Increasing expenses: Rising raw material costs Rising labor costs Rising marketing expenses

Lower demand for products or services Pricing pressure from competitors Products going off patent

Page 10: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 10

Page 11: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 11

Pre-Tax Profit Margin

Represents how much of each sales dollar a company keeps before taxes

SSG focuses on pre-tax profit margin rather than net profit margin. Tax rates change from time to time

Sales -Cost of Goods Sold- OverheadPPM =

Sales

Page 12: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 12

Using Value Line

Value Line provides net profit margin (after tax) rather than pretax profit margin

With net profit margin and tax rate, we can calculate the pre-tax profit margin

Net ProfitPre - Tax Profit Margin =

(1- Tax Rate)

Page 13: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 13

Looking for Consistency

Look for a steady upward trend that is above average for the industry

Be skeptical of above average profit margins that make a big jump

Consistent numbers year after year might mean either peak efficiency or stagnation

Look for correlation with consistent and increasing revenues and earnings

Page 14: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 14

Examples

#1 – Lowe’s Companies:

#2 – Orthodontic Centers of America:

Page 15: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 15

Examples

#3 – Wal-Mart Stores:

#4 – Lucent Technologies:

Page 16: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 16Note Increasing Pre-Tax Margin

Page 17: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 17Note Decreasing Pre-Tax Margin

Page 18: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 18

A few More Examples

#5 – Qwest Communications:

#6 – General Motors:

Page 19: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 19

What Profit Margins Tell Us

Efficiency of management in earning money for each dollar of sales

Comparing profit margins within an industry helps find the best company

Reduced profit margins may suggest additional competition or increased costs

Declining profit margins can provide an early warning indicator of declining earnings

Page 20: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 20

Understanding Profit Margins Pre-tax profit margins varies with industry

Grocery – 3.5% Retail Specialty – 9% Insurance (Property & Casualty) – 14% S&P 500 – 17% Major Drugs – 24% Software & Programming – 27%

Always compare a company’s profit margins with its industry peers and competitors

Page 21: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 21

What ROE Means

A measure of how well a company has used reinvested earnings to generate additional earnings

ROE is the key financial factor in defining the growth potential of the company from internal sources

Page 22: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 22

Return on Equity

Line 2b of the SSG Measures management’s skill in profitability,

asset management, and financial leverage Profitability is major driver, so usually tracks PTP

Is ROE stable, rising or falling? How does company compare to competitors,

industry average or market in general? Average ROE for S&P 500 is around 15% Generally, anything above 10% is good

Page 23: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 23

Calculating ROE

Two ways of calculating ROE: EPS ÷ Book Value Net Income ÷ Equity

Two variations of equity/book value Use end of year book value Use start of year book value

NAIC Stock Analyst & Investor’s Toolkit support both options

Page 24: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 24

Components of ROE

Asset turnover (efficiency) Profit margin (profitability) Financial leverage (leverage) Tax Retention Rate (100% - tax rate)

Net IncomeROE =

Equity

Sales Pretax Income Assets Net IncomeROE =

Assets Sales Equity Pretax Income

ROE = Turnover Pretax Profit Margin Leverage Tax Retention Rate

Page 25: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 25

Quarterly PERT for RPM

Warning

Improvement

Page 26: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 26

Trailing 12 mos PERT for RPM

Note drop in 12-mo EPS and PTP

Starting to turn the corner

Page 27: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 27

Pretax Margins as Early Warning

RPM

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

1/2

/97

5/2

/97

9/2

/97

1/2

/98

5/2

/98

9/2

/98

1/2

/99

5/2

/99

9/2

/99

1/2

/00

5/2

/00

9/2

/00

1/2

/01

5/2

/01

9/2

/01

1/2

/02

5/2

/02

9/2

/02

1/2

/03

Decline in

12-mo PTMTTM PTM and Net

Profit Increase

Page 28: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 28

Changes in Net Profit and PTM

Lucent (LU)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

4/4/

96

8/4/

96

12/4

/96

4/4/

97

8/4/

97

12/4

/97

4/4/

98

8/4/

98

12/4

/98

4/4/

99

8/4/

99

12/4

/99

4/4/

00

8/4/

00

12/4

/00

4/4/

01

8/4/

01

12/4

/01

4/4/

02

8/4/

02

Net Profit declines 47%

PTM falls from 14% to 2%

Page 29: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 29

Sometimes the signals are too late

Orthodontic Centers (OCA)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

7/1

/99

11/1

/99

3/1

/00

7/1

/00

11/1

/00

3/1

/01

7/1

/01

11/1

/01

3/1

/02

7/1

/02

11/1

/02

3/1

/03

7/1

/03

11/1

/03

3/1

/04

7/1

/04

11/1

/04

PTM and % Sales

drop off

Page 30: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 30

ROE and Potential Internal Growth Average rate of return earned on earnings

reinvested in the business Theoretical limit on growth without financing Also called the “Implied” or “Sustainable

Growth Rate” of a company ROE can be used to determine potential

earnings growth of company without borrowing Return on Equity x Earnings Retention Rate Generally, use 5-year average for ROE

Page 31: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 31

Sustainable or Implied Growth Rate

Implied Growth Rate = 26.5% x (1 – .362) = 16.9%

Page 32: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 32

How to Assess ROE

Return on Equity is a measure of management’s efficiency in earning profits on shareholder investment and reinvestment

Higher is better, all other things equal An upward trend over time is positive Stability at 15% or higher is acceptable Recent downtrends of two or more years are

a serious “red flag”

Page 33: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 33

ROE Example - HDI

Exceeds IndustryAverage

Trendup

Page 34: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 34

ROE Example - BBBY

Exceeds IndustryAverage

Even toSlightly Down

Page 35: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 35

ROE Example - PSFT

BelowIndustryAverage

Down

Page 36: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 36

Review

Use Section 1 to assess revenue and earnings growth for consistency and growth

Use Section 2 to assess pretax profit margins and ROE (consistent or growing)

Look at with industry peers Cross check quality

Value Line Financial Strength (B+ or better) and Earnings predictability (85 or better)

S&P “Investability Quotient” Rating (85 or better)

Page 37: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 37

Use S&P to Confirm Quality

Page 38: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 38

Value Line Quality Indicators

Earnings Predictability—a measure of the reliability of an earnings forecast. The most reliable forecasts tend to be those with the highest rating (100); the least reliable (5).

Financial Strength Rating—a relative measure of financial strength of the companies reviewed by Value Line. The relative ratings range from A++ (strongest) down to C (weakest), in nine steps.

Page 39: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 39

Value Line Quality Indicators

Financial Strength (B++ or better)

Earnings Predictability(85 or better)

Page 40: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 40

Robertson Quality Rating (RQR)

Financial

Financial Strength A++ = 25 … C = 0 Up to 25 points

EPS Predictability VL score (100 max)

divided by 4. e.g., 90 yields 90/4 = 22.5 points

Future Performance

Sales Growth 25/2 * (Co Grw / Ind Grw)

e.g., co = 15, ind = 10, = 25/2 * 15/10 = 18.75

Relative Profitability 25/2 * (Co NM /Ind NM) e.g., co = 18, ind = 14,

= 25/2 * 18/14 = 16

Page 41: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 41

RQR for BBBY

Financial Financial Strength

A++ = 25 EPS Predictability

100 = 25

25+25+20.6+22.2 = 92.8

Future Performance Sales Growth

Retail (special lines) (17 / 10.3)* (25/2) 20.6

Relative Profitability (11 / 6.2)* (25/2) 22.2

Page 42: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 42

RQR for WMT

Financial Financial Strength

A++ = 25 EPS Predictability

100 = 25

25+25+18.4+11.6 = 80

Future Performance Sales Growth

Retail Store (13 / 8.8)* (25/2) 18.4

Relative Profitability (3.7 / 4)* (25/2) 11.6

Page 43: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 43

RQR for INTC

Financial Financial Strength

A++ = 25 EPS Predictability

50 = 12.5

25+12.5+10.4+16.7 = 64.6

Future Performance Sales Growth

Semiconductor (10.5 / 12.6)* (25/2) 10.4

Relative Profitability (24 / 18)* (25/2) 16.7

Page 44: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 44

RQR for GM

Financial Financial Strength

B = .25 * 30 = 7.5 EPS Predictability

35 = .25 * 35 = 12.5

7.5+12.5+5.1+5.1 = 30.2

Future Performance Sales Growth

Semiconductor (1.5 / 3.7)* (25/2) 5.1

Relative Profitability (2.0 / 4.9)* (25/2) 5.1

Page 45: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 45

Example of Weak Management

Page 46: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 46

Looking at the Data – LTR

Page 47: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 47

Example of Solid Management

Page 48: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 48

Look at the Data – BBBY

Page 49: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 49

Good Management = Quality

Note the correlation with quality factors Consistent growth in

sales and earnings Increasing profit margin Increasing ROE

Page 50: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 50

Finding Quality Management

Software Programs NAIC Prospector AAII Stock Investor Pro Microsoft Money Website

Screening is just that – a screen Further research and analysis is always

required

Page 51: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 51

Screening for Quality

ROE > Industry ROE ROE > 10% EPS Growth > Industry EPS Growth Sales Growth > Industry Sales Growth Historical EPS and Rev Growth > 10% Consistent EPS Growth or (R2 > 0.9) Revenues > $100 million At least five years of public data

Page 52: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 52

Translating to Prospector

Page 53: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 53

Prospector Results

Page 54: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 54

Prospector Report Weighting

Page 55: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 55

Top Four from the Quality Screen Harley Davidson (HDI)

RQR = 80.1, PAR = 13.9 Bed, Bath and Beyond (BBBY)

RQR = 92.6, PAR = 23.0 D.H. Horton (DHI)

RQR = 64.5, PAR = 10.6 SCP Pool Corp. (POOL)

Page 56: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 56

Page 57: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 57

Page 58: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 58

Page 59: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 59

Page 60: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 60

On-line Resources

NAIC – OPS Data for SSGs Available with NAIC membership

Reuters – www.investor.reuters.com Value Line – www.valueline.com S&P Reports – Most on-line brokers provide

Page 61: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 61

Recommended Reading

Evaluating Management by Amy Rauch-Neilson www.better-investing.org/articles/bi/120/1000

Determining the Quality of Management by Nancy Isaacs www.better-investing.org/articles/bi/11/108

Quality: A Measure of Excellence by Mark Robertson www.better-investing.org/articles/web/4654

Page 62: Evaluating Company Management

07 May 2005 NAIC DC Chapter 62

Conclusion

Any final questions? You can contact me at:

Ty Hughes – [email protected]://tyhughes.net/moosepond

Better Investing!