evacuation escape and rescue
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Evacuation Escape and Rescue
1/16
PRESENTATIONPRESENTATION
BYBYOgbu Chinedu E.Ogbu Chinedu E.
Development of a generic Spreadsheet model for calculating
Fatality Rate from Evacuation, Escape and Rescue process in
offshore Multi-Platform Complex.
Engineering Challenges and Opportunities that could be
faced by Subsea 7
8th Feb. 2012
-
8/3/2019 Evacuation Escape and Rescue
2/16
WHY MODEL FATALITY RATEWHY MODEL FATALITY RATE
FROM EERFROM EER Regulatory Requirement
For Decision Making
-It can identify weaknesses in the evacuation system-It can be used to determine the impact of failure of each ofthe available means of evacuation
-Will result in the development of appropriateprocedures and strategies for any type of emergency
QRASAFETY
CASE
PFEER
Fire and Explosion
Analysis
Evacuation, Escape
and Rescue Analysis
-
8/3/2019 Evacuation Escape and Rescue
3/16
Ecofisk Complex
Mumbai High: before the accident Mumbai High: after the accident
-
8/3/2019 Evacuation Escape and Rescue
4/16
PROJECT METHODOLOGYPROJECT METHODOLOGY
Literature ReviewDiscussions with Industryand Academic Supervisors
Familiarisation withthe EER process
UnderstandingExisting EER
Models
Development of a Model forCalculating Fatality Rate during
EER Process
Test Running the Model on aHypothetical Platform Complex
Recommendations on How toImprove the Model
-
8/3/2019 Evacuation Escape and Rescue
5/16
CONCEPTS IMPLEMENTATIONCONCEPTS IMPLEMENTATION
Personnel are required to move to, and
evacuate from the temporary refuge (TR).
Accident on one of the platforms, leavessome or all the platform cut-off from theTR.
As a result, personnel could evacuate from
a maximum of five possible locations(Evacuation Points)
-
8/3/2019 Evacuation Escape and Rescue
6/16
....concept implementation....concept implementation
Platform used as the TRLocation of accident
Platforms with accessto the TR
Group A
Group B
Group CPlatform
Bridge Link
-
8/3/2019 Evacuation Escape and Rescue
7/16
...concept implementation...concept implementation
Evacuation Points
The five possible evacuation points are:
Platform used as the TR, PLTR Platform where the accident has
occurred, PLaccident
Group A Platforms, PLgrp A Group B Platforms, PLgrp B Group C Platforms, PLgrp C
-
8/3/2019 Evacuation Escape and Rescue
8/16
CALCULATING FATALITY RATECALCULATING FATALITY RATE
-
8/3/2019 Evacuation Escape and Rescue
9/16
...calculating fatality rate...calculating fatality rate
Total Fatalities = ( Evacuation Phase Fatalities )
+ ( Rescue Phase Fatality )
Fatality Rate= Total Fatalities * Evacuation Freq.
-
8/3/2019 Evacuation Escape and Rescue
10/16
Spreadsheet SamplesSpreadsheet Samples
INPUT TABLE FOR PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION
Platforms AP P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 ...........Pn
Number of Personnel 120 35 50 70 60 80 98 60 0 0 0
Helideck 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lifeboat: Number Available 6 2 2 2 1 4 2 3 0 0 0
Capacity 40 40 30 40 40 40 30 40 0 0 0
Liferaft: Number Available 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0
Capacity 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 23 0 0 0
Table 1:Personnel and Equipment Distribution
AP P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 ...........Pn
Platform Used as TR 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Location of Accident 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Platform(s) with Access to the TR 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0
Platform(s) with no Access to the TR: Groups A 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Table 2: For Platform selection
-
8/3/2019 Evacuation Escape and Rescue
11/16
.....continuation.....continuationCASE A
EVACUATION FROM THE ACCIDENT LOCATION PLATFORM (PLaccident)
RESULT
HELICOPTER EVACUATION
FATALITY IN SEA
Total Number of personnel evacuated by helicopter 0
Pre-Embarkation
LIFEBOAT EVACUATION
Number of Personnel to be evacuated by Lifeboat from ALP 12
Number of Lifeboats Launched Successfully 1
Number of Personnel on each Lifeboats 12
Number of Personnel Remaining After Lifeboat Evacuation 0
LIFERAFT EVACUATION
Number of Personnel falling into the Sea During Embarkation 0
Number of fatality as a result of falling into sea during Embarkation 0
Number of Personnel alive in sea as a result of falling into sea during Embarkation 0
Number of Liferaft Launched Successfully 0
Number of Personnel on each Liferaft 0.0
ESCAPE TO SEA
Number of Personnel Remaining after Liferaft Evacuation that will Escape to Sea 0
Number of Fatalities from Initial Drowning 0Number of personnel alive in sea 0
Sub-Total (Pre-Embarkation) 0 0
Post-Embarkation
LIFEBOAT EVACUATION
LAUNCH RESULTS FATALITY IN SEA
Number of personnel Successfully Evacuated by Lifeboat 12
DESCENT
Probability of failure during descent 0
Number of Fatality as a Result of Lifeboats failure during descent 0
Number of Personnel alive in Sea as a Result of Lifeboat Failure during descent 0
Number of Personnel intact in Lifeboat after descent 12
IN SEA
Probability of Hook failing to release 0
Probability of Lifeboat capsizing 0
Probability of lifeboat colliding with Structure 0.3
Probability of lifeboat failing after successful descent 0.3
Number of Personnel in sea due to lifeboat failure after successful descent 3.6
LIFERAFT EVACUATION
LAUNCH
Number of personnel Successfully Evacuated by Lifeboat 0
DESCENT
Probability of Liferaft failure during descent 0
Number of Fatality as a Result of Liferaft failure during descent 0
Number of Personnel alive in Sea as a Result of Liferaft Failure during descent 0
Number of Personnel intact in Lifeboat after descent 0
IN SEA
Probability of Hook failing to release 0
Probability of Liferaft Deflating 0.3
Probability of Liferaft colliding with Structure 0.1
Probability of Liferaft failing after successful descent 0.4
Number of Personnel in sea due to liferaft failure after successful descent 0
FATALITY IN SEA
Sub-Total (Post-Embarkation) 0 3.6
TOTAL 0.00 3.60
-
8/3/2019 Evacuation Escape and Rescue
12/16
.....continuation.....continuation
RESULT FOR CASE A
Platform Used as the TR AP
Platforms with access to the TR P4 P6 P7
Number of Personnel to be Evacuated from this Pl atform 356
Number of Fatality f rom the Evacuation phase 54.38
Number of fatality fron the Rescue phase 85.128
Total number of fatality 139.51
Location of Accident P4
Number of personnel to be e vacuated from this Platform 12.00
Number of fatalities f rom the Evacuation phase 0.00
Number of fatalities from the Rescue Phase 1.44
Total number of fatality 1.44Group A Platform(s) P3
Number of personnel to be e vacuated from this group 80.8
Number of fatalities f rom the Evacuation phase 0.00
Number of fatalities from the Rescue Phase 9.7248
Total number of fatality 9.72
Group B Platform(s) P1 P2
Number of personnel to be e vacuated from this group 92.2
Number of fatalities f rom the Evacuation phase 0.00
Number of fatalities from the Rescue Phase 11.064
11.06
Group C Platform(s) Total number of fatality P5
Number of personnel to be e vacuated from this group 80
Number of fatalities f rom the Evacuation phase 0.00
Number of fatalities from the Rescue Phase 9.6Total number of fatality 9.60
Overral Result for Case A
NUMBER OF FATALITY FROM EVACUATION PHASE 54.38
NUMBER OF FATALITY FROM RESCUE PHASE 116.9568
TOTAL FATALITY FROM BOTH OPERATIONS 171.34
FATALITY RATE (Per installation year) 5.14E-01
-
8/3/2019 Evacuation Escape and Rescue
13/16
-
8/3/2019 Evacuation Escape and Rescue
14/16
ENGINEERING SKILLSENGINEERING SKILLS
DEMONSTRATEDDEMONSTRATEDAbility to solve engineering problems throughcreative and innovative thinking
The ability to apply mathematical, scientific and
technological tools
Enthusiastic, in the application of knowledge,understanding and skills in solving problems
Self-motivation
Good time management skills
-
8/3/2019 Evacuation Escape and Rescue
15/16
Engineering Challenges andEngineering Challenges andOpportunitiesOpportunities
y Increase in technical complexity ofprojects will mean that
y Onerous regulatory requirements.y Extending the life of subsea infrastructure
and decommissioning uneconomic subsea
asset.
-
8/3/2019 Evacuation Escape and Rescue
16/16