europeaneuropean society of society of lingual orthodontics · 2015-07-21 · lingual orthodontics...
TRANSCRIPT
EuropeanEuropean Society ofSociety ofLingual Orthodontics Lingual Orthodontics
Patient: Quijada S.
Applicant: Last Name: BECKER First Name: Germain1
RÉSUMÉ OF CASERÉSUMÉ OF CASE
Before
After Active
2
DIAGNOSTIC DESCRIPTION OF THE MALOCCLUSION
Diagnostic:• Age: 42 years – Gender: FemalePatient’s Chiefcomplaint
– 12, 22 rotation– Lower cuspids’ dysharmony– Former 32’s extraction
3
February 2007y
Facial Photographs4
Facial Photographs
February 2007y
5Intra – oral photos
February 2007y
6Skull X-ray
Analyse céphalométrique (Tweed) SCHutz 1Type morphologique
Sens vertical Type squelettique Sens sagittal Type esthétique
NORMES VALEURS CLINIQUES
DIAGNOSTIC
FMA 25° +- 3° 24° Normodivergente
Axe Y 60° 60° Confirme la normodivergence
FMIA 67° +-3° 60° Incisive inférieure bien placé sur sa base
AO BO 2mm 3 mm Classe II squelettiqueAO-BO -2mm -+2mm
3 mm Classe II squelettique
SNA 82° +-2° 84° Normomaxillie
SNB 80° 2° 80° N dib liSNB 80° +-2° 80° Normomandibulie
ANB 2° 4° Classe II squelettique
I/Fr 107° 117° Vestibuloversion incisive supérieure
I/i 135° 125° Bipro
ImPA 90° +-3° 96° Vestibuloversion incisive inférieure
Angle Z 75° +-3° 77° Harmonie facial
Index Hfp / Hfa
0,69 0,73 Index de difficulté
February 2007y
Panoramic X-ray
9
RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS BEFORE TREATMENT
• 1- 4 wisdom teeth2 P i d ti li it d• 2- Periodontics: limitedbone loss, low risk
11
LINGUAL TREATMENT PLAN AND REASON FOR IT
1 UA & LA t i i• 1- UA & LA stripping• 2- Leveling & uprighting• 3- rotations: 12, 22, 33, 43• 4- Archs’ coordination• 5- retention
12
RÉSUMÉ OF THE LINGUAL ORTHODONTICRÉSUMÉ OF THE LINGUAL ORTHODONTICTREATMENT CARRIED OUT INCLUDING ANY
DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTEREDDIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED
• 1- 33 43 took more time than estimated1 33, 43 took more time than estimated• 2- Lower midline not possible, only 3 incisors• 3- Nice success in Class I cuspid relationship• 3- Nice success in Class I cuspid relationship
(3 lower incisors
13
March 2007
14aIntra – oral photos
November 2007
14bIntra – oral photos
June 2008
14…Intra – oral photos
October 2008
Facial Photographs15
Facial Photographs
October 2008
16Intra – oral photos
October 2008
17Skull X-ray
Analyse céphalométrique (Tweed) SCHUTZ 2Type morphologique
Sens vertical Type squelettique Sens sagittal Type esthétique
NORMES VALEURS CLINIQUES
DIAGNOSTIC
FMA 25° +- 3° 24° Normodivergente
Axe Y 60° 60° Confirme la normodivergence
FMIA 67° +-3° 66° Incisive inférieure bien placé sur sa base
AO BO 2mm 2 mm Classe I squelettiqueAO-BO -2mm -+2mm
2 mm Classe I squelettique
SNA 82° +-2° 83° Normomaxillie
SNB 80° 2° 81° N dib liSNB 80° +-2° 81° Normomandibulie
ANB 2° 2° Classe I squelettique
I/Fr 107° 110° Normoversion incisive supérieure
I/i 135° 130° Norme
ImPA 90° +-3° 92° Normoversion incisive inférieure
Angle Z 75° +-3° 78° Harmonie facial
PERIAPICAL OR PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS ATCOMPLETION OF TREATMENTCOMPLETION OF TREATMENT
Panoramic X-ray
20
RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS AT COMPLETION OF TREATMENT
• 1- No periodontic problem occured• 2- 4 wisdom teeth extractions to be planned
21
RESULTDESCRIPTION
• Treatment time: 15 months• 1 33 43 took more time than estimated• 1- 33, 43 took more time than estimated• 2- Lower midline not possible, only 3 p , y
incisors3 Ni i Cl I id• 3- Nice success in Class I cuspid relationship (3 lower incisors)p ( )
22
Intra oral Tx - Result StudyIntra oral Tx Result Study
22b
Intra oral Occlusal Tx - Result Studyy
22c
Facial Tx - Result Study
Smile
Smile
22d