etp econ lecture chapter 16

Upload: nitin-sharma

Post on 08-Aug-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    1/38

    Oligopoly and Game Theory

    ETP Economics 101

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    2/38

    Imperfect Competition

    Imperfect competition refers to those marketstructures that fall between perfectcompetition and pure monopoly.

    Imperfect competition includes industries inwhich firms have competitors but do notface so much competition that they are price

    takers.

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    3/38

    Types

    Types of Imperfectly Competitive Markets

    Oligopoly

    Only a few sellers, each offering a similar or identical

    product to the others.

    Monopolistic Competition

    Many firms selling products that are similar but notidentical.

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    4/38

    Copyright 2004 South-Western

    Tap waterCable TV

    Monopoly(Chapter 15)NovelsMovies

    MonopolisticCompetition(Chapter 17)

    Tennis ballsCrude oil

    Oligopoly(Chapter 16)

    Number of Firms?

    Perfect

    Wheat Milk

    Competition(Chapter 14)

    Type of Products?

    IdenticalproductsDifferentiatedproductsOnefirm Fewfirms

    Manyfirms

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    5/38

    Key Feature

    Because of the few sellers, the key featureof oligopoly is the tension betweencooperation and self-interest.

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    6/38

    Characteristics

    Characteristics of an Oligopoly Market

    Few sellers offering similar or identical products

    Interdependent firms

    Best off cooperating and acting like amonopolist by producing a small quantity ofoutput and charging a price above marginal cost

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    7/38

    Simple Type: Duopoly

    A duopoly is an oligopoly with only twomembers. It is the simplest type of oligopoly.

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    8/38

    Collusion and Cartel

    The duopolists may agree on a monopolyoutcome.

    Collusion

    An agreement among firms in a market aboutquantities to produce or prices to charge.

    Cartel

    A group of firms acting in unison.

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    9/38

    Is Cartel Possible?

    Although oligopolists would like to formcartels and earn monopoly profits, often thatis not possible. Antitrust laws prohibit

    explicit agreements among oligopolists as amatter of public policy.

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    10/38

    The Equilibrium for an Oligopoly

    A Nash equilibrium is a situation in whicheconomic actors interacting with oneanother each choose their best strategy

    given the strategies that all the others havechosen.

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    11/38

    The equilibrium for an Oligopoly

    When firms in an oligopoly individually chooseproduction to maximize profit, they producequantity of output greater than the level produced

    by monopoly and less than the level produced bycompetition.

    The oligopoly price is less than the monopoly pricebut greater than the competitive price (which

    equals marginal cost).

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    12/38

    Size of an Oligopoly

    How increasing the number of sellers affectsthe price and quantity:The output effect: Because price is above

    marginal cost, selling more at the going priceraises profits.

    The price effect: Raising production willincrease the amount sold, which will lower the

    price and the profit per unit on all units sold.

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    13/38

    Size of an Oligopoly

    As the number of sellers in an oligopolygrows larger, an oligopolistic market looksmore and more like a competitive market.

    The price approaches marginal cost, andthe quantity produced approaches thesocially efficient level.

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    14/38

    Strategic Action

    Because the number of firms in anoligopolistic market is small, each firm mustact strategically.

    Each firm knows that its profit depends notonly on how much it produces but also onhow much the other firms produce.

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    15/38

    Game Theory

    Game theoryis the study of how peoplebehave in strategic situations.

    Strategic decisions are those in which eachperson, in deciding what actions to take,must consider how others might respond tothat action.

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    16/38

    Prisoners Dilemma

    Theprisoners dilemma provides insight into thedifficulty in maintaining cooperation.

    Often people (firms) fail to cooperate with one

    another even when cooperation would makethem better off.

    The prisoners dilemma is a particulargamebetween two captured prisoners that illustrateswhy cooperation is difficult to maintain even whenit is mutually beneficial.

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    17/38Copyright2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning

    Bonnie s Decision

    Confess

    ConfessBonnie gets 8 years

    Clyde gets 8 years

    Bonnie gets 20 years

    Clyde goes freeBonnie goes free

    Clyde gets 20 years

    gets 1 yearBonnie

    Clyde gets 1 year

    Remain Silent

    RemainSilent

    ClydesDecision

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    18/38

    Dominant Strategy

    The dominant strategyis the best strategy for aplayer to follow regardless of the strategieschosen by the other players.

    Dominant strategies in Prisoners dilemma:

    _ Clyde: Confess

    _ Bonnie: Confess

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    19/38

    Nash Equilibrium & BestOutcome

    Nash Equilibrium (self-interest):

    _ Clyde: Confess & Bonnie: Confess

    Best Outcome (cooperation):

    _ Clyde: Silent & Bonnie: Silent

    Cooperation is difficult to maintain, becausecooperation is not in the best interest of theindividual player.

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    20/38

    Game Example: OPEC

    Iraq and Iran: Members of OPEC

    Their decisions on oil production.

    Decisions: High Production or LowProduction

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    21/38Copyright2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning

    Iraqs Decision

    HighProduction

    High ProductionIraq gets $40 billion

    Iran gets $40 billion

    Iraq gets $30 billion

    Iran gets $60 billionIraq gets $60 billion

    Iran gets $30 billion

    Iraq gets $50 billion

    Iran gets $50 billion

    Low Production

    LowProduction

    IransDecision

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    22/38

    Nash Equilibrium

    Dominant strategies:_ Iran: High Production_ Iraq: High Production

    Nash Equilibrium (self-interest):_ Iran: High Production & Iraq: High Production

    Best Outcome (cooperation):_ Iran: low production & Iraq: low production

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    23/38

    Game Example: Arm Race

    Game Players: USA & Russia

    Decisions: Arm or Disarm

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    24/38Copyright2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning

    Decision of the United States (U.S.)

    Arm

    ArmU.S. at risk

    USSR at risk

    U.S. at risk and weak

    USSR safe and powerfulU.S. safe and powerful

    USSR at risk and weak

    U.S. safe

    USSR safe

    Disarm

    Disarm

    Decision

    of the

    Soviet Union

    (USSR)

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    25/38

    Nash Equilibrium

    Dominant strategies:_ USA: Arm_ Russia: Arm

    Nash Equilibrium (self-interest):_ USA: Arm & Russia: Arm

    Best Outcome (cooperation):_ USA: Disarm & Russia: Disarm

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    26/38

    Game Example: Advertising

    Players: Camel & Marlboro

    Decisions: Advertise or Dont advertise

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    27/38Copyright2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning

    Marlboro s Decision

    Advertise

    AdvertiseMarlboro gets $3

    billion profitCamel gets $3billion profit Camel gets $5billion profit

    Marlboro gets $2billion profit

    Camel gets $2billion profit

    Marlboro gets $5billion profit

    Camel gets $4billion profit

    Marlboro gets $4billion profit

    Dont Advertise

    DontAdvertise

    CamelsDecision

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    28/38

    Nash Equilibrium

    Dominant strategies:_ Camel: Advertise_ Marlboro: Advertise

    Nash Equilibrium (self-interest):_ Camel: Advertise_ Marlboro: Advertise

    Best Outcome (cooperation):_ Camel: Dont Advertise_ Marlboro: Dont Advertise

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    29/38

    Game Example: CommonResource such as Oil

    Players: Texaco & Exxon

    Decisions: Drill Two Wells or Drill one Well

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    30/38

    Copyright2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning

    Exxons Decision

    Drill TwoWells

    Drill Two WellsExxon gets $4

    million profit

    Texaco gets $4million profit Texaco gets $6million profit

    Exxon gets $3million profit

    Texaco gets $3million profit

    Exxon gets $6million profit

    Texaco gets $5million profit

    Exxon gets $5million profit

    Drill One Well

    Drill OneWell

    TexacosDecision

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    31/38

    Nash Equilibrium

    Dominant strategies:_ Texaco: Drill Two Wells_ Exxon: Drill Two Wells

    Nash Equilibrium (self-interest):_Texaco: Drill Two Wells_ Exxon: Drill Two Wells

    Best Outcome (cooperation):_ Texaco: Drill One Well_ Exxon: Drill One Well

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    32/38

    Game Example: Where toAdvertise?

    Players: Competitor.com or We.com

    Decisions: NBA and NHL

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    33/38

    No Nash equilibrium in pure strategies

    Competitor.com

    NBA NHL

    NBA W: 4,C: 3

    W: 3,C: 4

    We.comNHL W: 3,

    C: 4

    W: 4,

    C: 3

    Where to advertise?

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    34/38

    No Nash Equilibrium

    Dominant strategies:_ We.com: none_ Competitor.com: none

    Nash Equilibrium (self-interest):_ We.com: none_ Competitor.com: none

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    35/38

    Game Example: Evening News

    Players: ATV and TVB

    Decisions: 7:30 pm or 8:00 pm

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    36/38

    Evening News:

    TVB

    7:30pm 8:0pm

    7:30pm A: 1,

    B: 1

    A: 3,

    B: 4

    ATV 8:0pm A: 4,B: 3

    A: 2.5,B: 2.5

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    37/38

    Nash Equilibrium

    Dominant strategies:_ ATV: none_ TVB: none

    Two Nash Equilibria (self-interest):

    _ ATV: 7:30pm & TVB: 8:00pmor

    _ ATV: 8:00pm & TVB: 7:30pm

    Wh P l S ti

  • 8/22/2019 ETP Econ Lecture Chapter 16

    38/38

    Why People SometimesCooperate

    Firms that care about future profits willcooperate in repeated games rather thancheating in a single game to achieve a one-

    time gain.