ethical theories. parable of the sadhu what would you have done? are there any good solutions? how...
TRANSCRIPT
Ethical Theories
Parable of the Sadhu
Parable of the Sadhu
What would you have done? Are there any good solutions?
•How would we compare solutions?
What is the best way to decide the right course of action?
Rest: 4 stage model of EDM
Moral awareness
moral judgment
moral intent
moral behavior
3 C’s
Controlled Conscious Cognitive
A woman was near death from a special kind of cancer. There was one drug that the doctors
thought might save her. It was a form of radium that a druggist in the same town had recently discovered. The drug was expensive to make, but the druggist was charging ten times what
the drug cost him to produce. He paid $200 for the radium and charged $2,000 for a small
dose of the drug. The sick woman's husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow the
money, but he could only get together about $1,000 which is half of what it cost. He told the druggist that his wife was dying and asked him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later. But the druggist said: "No, I discovered the drug and
I'm going to make money from it."
So Heinz got desperate and broke into the man's store to steal the drug for his wife.
Heinz Dilemma
Should Heinz have broken into the store to steal the drug
for his wife?
Why or why not?
Stages 1 & 2
Obedience•Heinz should not steal the medicine because he will
consequently be put in prison which will mean he is a bad person.
•Heinz should steal the medicine because it is only worth $200 and not how much the druggist wanted for it; Heinz had even offered to pay for it and was not stealing anything else.
Self-interest•Heinz should steal the medicine because he will be much
happier if he saves his wife, even if he will have to serve a prison sentence.
•Heinz should not steal the medicine because prison is an awful place, and he would probably languish over a jail cell more than his wife's death.
Stages 3 & 4
Conformity•Heinz should steal the medicine because his wife expects
it; he wants to be a good husband.•Heinz should not steal the drug because stealing is bad and
he is not a criminal; he tried to do everything he could without breaking the law, you cannot blame him.
Law-and-order•Heinz should not steal the medicine because the law
prohibits stealing, making it illegal.•Heinz should steal the drug for his wife but also take the
prescribed punishment for the crime as well as paying the druggist what he is owed. Criminals cannot just run around without regard for the law; actions have consequences.
Stages 5 & 6
Human rights•Heinz should steal the medicine because everyone has a
right to choose life, regardless of the law. •Heinz should not steal the medicine because the scientist
has a right to fair compensation. Even if his wife is sick, it does not make his actions right.
Universal human ethics•Heinz should steal the medicine, because saving a human
life is a more fundamental value than the property rights of another person.
•Heinz should not steal the medicine, because others may need the medicine just as badly, and their lives are equally significant.
Who cares about my stage?!
Your stage matters!
Problem-solving changes in your 20s-30s
Specific educational attempts to influence awareness
Behavior is influenced by moral perception and moral judgments
3 C’s
Controlled Conscious Cognitive
Can the 3 C’s explain everything?
Julie and Mark are brother and sister. They are traveling together in France on summer vacation from college. One night they are staying alone in
a cabin near the beach. They decided that it would be interesting and fun if they tried making
love. At the very least it would be a new experience for each of them. Julie was already
taking birth control, and Mark used a condom just to be safe. They both enjoy it, but decided not to
do it again. They keep that night as a special secret, which
makes them feel even closer.
Can this explain it?
Moral awareness
moral judgment
moral intent
moral behavior
Emotion
Cognition Judgment & Behavior
Decision-making
Often outside of our awareness The effect of “primes” in research
Moral stages don’t stop dilemmas from occurring…
Trolley problem
Ethical Dilemmas = Tension
Rules vs. resultsMeans vs. endsThe good vs. the rightPrinciple vs. practicalityThe needs of many vs. the rights of the few (or the one)
Ethical Lenses
The battle between rules, rights, relationships and reputation
T. L. Ceranic Business & Society (ETLW 302)
Rights/Responsibilities Lens (duties)
Emphasizes DUTY Consequences play a minor role
PlatoImmanuel Kant
Focuses on the ideals (whether through Nature or God) that we as people should seek.
Deontology
Relationship Lens (fair systems)
Seeks justice and to care for those less fortunate
•John Rawls
Deontology
Results Lens (goals)
Focuses on individual results, goals and what makes individuals happy.
Adam SmithJeremy BenthamJohn Stuart Mill
Utilitarianism/Teleological
Reputation Lens (virtues)
Focuses on what virtues are valued by the community and that those in positions of responsibility should cultivate.
The What makes us responsible and virtuous citizens within our workplace/community?
AristotleAlisdair MacIntyre.
Utilitarian/Teleological Virtue ethics
Utilitarianism (GREY)
Advantages
Maximization of the good“Easy” decision processPopular
Disadvantages
MeasurementThe meansIndividual rights
Formalism (BLACK/WHITE)
Advantages
Protects the meansProtects individual rightsMorally more appealing
Disadvantages
InflexibleImpractical
T. L. Ceranic Business & Society (ETLW 302)
Student Privileges with Strings Attached
So what Lens are you?
Why is this important?
To understand how we make decisions To understand multiple positions To uncover biases To create powerful and effective responses To generate options To make ethical decisions
All individuals are morally autonomous beings with the power and right to choose their values,
but it does not follow that all choices and all value systems have an equal claim to be called
ethical.
When in Rome…
This makes ethics only a matter of opinion Denies that we can make rational or objective
ethical judgments No right or wrong
“Relative” harassment?
A male manager tells a female job applicant she will only be hired if she submits to his sexual advances.
The manager feels the behavior is fine and the woman feels it’s wrong.
According to the relativist:
•Each opinion is equally valid.•Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
Next class
Organizational culture