estudios de permeabilidad en - as-lat.com€¦ · estudios de permeabilidad en cÉlulas caco-2...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
ESTUDIOS DE PERMEABILIDAD EN CÉLULAS CACO-2
Ismael J. Hidalgo, Ph.D.
Absorption Systems, Exton, PA
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 2
Outline Morphology & Barrier Properties of the Intestinal Mucosa
What is Permeability?
Techniques for Studying Permeability
Description of the Caco-2 cell assay system -Origin of Caco-2 cells
-Cell Culture
-Permeability Assay
-Inter-laboratory Variability
Applications of the Caco-2 permeability assay -Absorption potential of drug candidates
-Biopharmaceutics classification systems (BCS): class determination
-Transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions
Final Thoughts
Acknowledgements
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 5
Apical membrane Insert
Well
Cell Monolayer
Microporous filter
Basolateral membrane
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Why Caco-2?
Caco-2 cells express the most common intestinal efflux and uptake transporters
DM β-actin P-gp BCRP MRP2 1B1 1B3 2B1 MRP1 DM
Intestinal Enterocytes C2BBe1 Monolayer
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 11
Origin of Caco-2 Cells
• Heterogeneous cell line derived from a colon adenocarcinoma removed from a 74 years old Caucasian male and deposited at the Sloan-Kettering Memorial Institute in NY in 1974.
• When grown in culture they develop polarity and undergo spontaneous differentiation into an enterocyte-like phenotype.
• Functionally, they mimic the barrier properties of the small intestine and express numerous intestinal enzymes and transporter proteins in the correct cellular domain.
• They have become the pharmaceutical industry standard for in vitro drug absorption/permeability studies.
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 12
Permeability Coefficient (Apparent Permeability Coefficient, Papp)
• An in vitro parameter used to assess the rate at which compounds traverse a barrier (e.g., the intestinal epithelial mucosa). Referred to as apparent because it represents the combined effect of all permeation pathways and not the permeation across any single barrier such as the unstirred water layer, cell membrane or tight junctions.
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 15
Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurement
Transwell
Tray
EVOM Epithelial
Voltohmmeter
Endohm
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 16
Caco-2 Permeability Assay Work Flow
• Cells are cultured in tissue culture flasks and split every 3-5 days.
• Cells seeded on collagen-coated polycarbonate filters (Transwell) at 60,000 cells/cm2 and cultured for 3 weeks in humidified CO2 incubator.
• When ready, the transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) is measured.
• If TEER is acceptable, determine Papp values for control compounds.
• Monolayers are used in permeability experiments.
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
API concentrations
are determined in
the apical and
basolateral dosing
compartments by
sampling the
solutions at
various times after
dosing.
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Permeability Assay: Transport vs Time Profiles
19
Cum
ula
tive T
ransport
Time
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 20
Apparent Permeability Coefficient (Papp)
• An in vitro parameter used to assess the rate at which compounds traverse a barrier (e.g., the intestinal epithelial mucosa). Referred to as apparent because it represents the combined effect of all permeation pathways and not the permeation across any single barrier such as the unstirred water layer, cell membrane or tight junctions.
• Papp = (dQr/dt)/(A x C0)
dQr/dt: Cumulative amount of compound that appears in the
receiver compartment vs time
A: permeation surface area (e.g., cell monolayer or tissue)
C0: Initial compound concentration in the donor compartment
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 21
Is In Vitro Papp a predictor of Fabs in Humans?
0
20
40
60
80
100
1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04Papp (cm/s)
Fab
s (
%)
BBRC (1991) 175:880-85
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 22
Inter-laboratory Variability: Caco-2 Papp vs Fabs data from 5 laboratories
0
20
40
60
80
100
1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04
Papp (cm/s)
Fab
s (
h)
Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 1: 385, 2001
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 23
• Biologic
– Seeding density
– Passage number
– Attachment factors
– Days in culture
– Cell viability
– Permeable support
– Trypsinization process
– Culture conditions
– Uptake Transporters
– Efflux Transporters
– Metabolizing enzymes
• Study Design
– Stirring vs stagnant
– Sampling schedule
– Transport Buffer
– pH
– Drug concentration
– Analytical methods
– Data analysis
– Co-solvents
What Factors Can Cause Variability?
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 24
Caco-2 cell assay: Quality Control
Caco-2 QC Strategy
Batch QC of randomly
selected monolayers
Screen each monolayer
prior to use
by measuring TEER
Check each monolayer
after use by
measuring marker
dye permeability
A Batch consists
of about 20
Transwell plates
or 240 individual
monolayers
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 25
Caco-2 QC chart for control compounds
1.00E-07
1.00E-06
1.00E-05
1.00E-04
1.00E-03
1.00E-02
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
QC assay #
Pa
pp
(c
m/s
ec
)
atenolol
pindolol
propranolol
Permeability Assay: Continuous Monitoring of Monolayer Barrier Properties
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 26
Applications of the Caco-2 Permeability Assay
1. Determination of the absorption potential of new chemical entities (NCEs)
2. Drug classification according to the BCS
3. Support of Formulation Development
4. Transport-mediated drug-drug interaction(s)
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 27
1. Absorption Potential Determination
Low
Medium
High
High
Low
•Drug Discovery
•Assign to a Bin
•Large numbers of NMEs
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 28
2. Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS)
Class III Ranitidine Cimetidine Atenolol Vancomycin
Class IV Furosemide Hydrochlorothiazide
High
Hig
h
Per
mea
bili
ty
Class II Ketoprofen Naproxen Carbamazepine
Class I Propranolol Verapamil Metoprolol
Solubility
Low
Low
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 29
2. BCS Classification
• BCS Based Biowaiver
• Regulatory acceptance of in vitro testing as a reliable surrogate for in vivo
• bioequivalence study
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Caco-2 Cell Monolayers
Permeability and P-gp
Function
• Days in culture: 21-28
• Passage number: 58-76
• Donor pH: 6.5 and 7.4
• Multiple operators
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 33
Caco-2 cell assay: Quality Control
Caco-2 QC Strategy
Batch QC of randomly
selected monolayers
Screen each monolayer
prior to use
by measuring TEER
Check each monolayer
after use by
measuring marker
dye permeability
A Batch consists
of about 20
Transwell plates
or 240 individual
monolayers
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
34
Permeability Classification
Caco-2 Cell Monolayers
Criteria for Biowaiver
► Rapid Dissolution
► Dose-Relevant Solubility
► High Permeability
Phase 1A: Eligibility
Screen
Phase 1B: Protocol
Optimization
Phase 2: Pivotal Classification
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Phase 1A: Eligibility Screen
Determine tolerable concentration range
Determine magnitude of non-specific binding
Is efflux ratio less than three?
Is permeability greater than minoxidil?
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Phase 1B: Protocol Optimization
Impact of Control Compounds
Concentration Range Mass Balance
Obtaining Quality Permeability Data
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Phase 2: Pivotal Study
GLP Analytical Validation
Multiple Concentrations
(0.01X, 0.1X, 1X)
Additional Replicates
(N=4)
GLP Classification
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 38
BCS Permeability Classification
Cum
ula
tive T
ransport
Time
HP, IS
LP, IS
Test Compound
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Minoxidil C
ac
o-2
Pap
p (
x 1
0-6
cm
/s)
Antipyrine: Papp ~63
Metoprolol: Papp ~28
Pindolol: Papp ~17
Minoxidil: Papp ~4
Absolute BA is 98%
• pH 7.4
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Why Minoxidil?
• At least 95% fraction
absorbed
• Passive transport
• No known food effects
or DDI
• No pH effect
How do you justify using minoxidil
as your high permeability internal
standard?
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
FDA Experience with Biowaivers
Mehta, Sept. 2010; AAPS Webinar: Application of Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) in Regulatory Submissions
Davit, June 2011, ‘BCS Classification Workshop, Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences ‘FDA Experience with Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) Biowaivers
>75%
Caco-2
Types of Data Submitted New Drugs vs. Generics
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 42
Applications of Biowaivers
• Approval for Generic Medicinal Products
• Formulation Development for New Drug Products
• Line Extensions Based on Proportional Similarity
• Post-approval Changes: Innovator and Generics
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Our Experience
Number of BCS Studies per Year at Absorption Systems
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Waive Complex BE Studies
•Therapeutic Area and PK Independent
Special Population
Special Population with
Reference Scaled Approach
Fed/Fasted
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 46
Compound Indication FDA Product Recommendation
Tested at Absorption
Systems (AS) Pemeability Classification at AS (High, Low or Not Performed)
BCS Classification by AS Based on Permeability in
Caco-2
BCS Classification based on human PK data or Mass
Balance
Buspirone Anxiety Buspirone Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Capecitabine Colorectal and breast cancers Capecitabine Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Cefadroxil Hemihydrate Antibiotic Cefadroxil Recommendation No NP NP Class I
Donepezil HCl Alzheimer-related dementia Donepezil Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Emtricitabine# HIV Emtricitabine Recommendation No NP NP Class I
Galantamine HBr Alzheimer’s dementia Galantamine Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Granisetron HCl Antiemetic Granisetron Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Levetiracetam Epileptic seizures Levetiracetam Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Levofloxacin Antibiotic Levofloxacin Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Linezolid Antibiotic Linezolid Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Memantine HCl Alzheimer-related dementia Memantine Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Milnacipran HCl Fibromyalgia Milnacipran Recommendation Yes Low* Class III* Class I
Palonosetron HCl Chemotherapy-induced nausea Palonosetron Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Pramipexole Dihydrochloride Parkinson’s disease Pramipexole Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Pregabalin Epileptic seizures Pregabalin Recommendation Yes Low** Class III ** Class I
Propranolol HCl Hypertension, tremors, migraine Propranolol Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Protriptyline HCl Depression Protriptyline Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Ramelteon Insomnia Ramelteon Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Rivastigmine Tartrate Alzheimer-related dementia Rivastigmine Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Sotalol HCl Cardiac arrhythmia Sotalol Recommendation Yes Low*** Class III *** Class I
Tapentadol HCl Pain Tapentadol Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Temozolomide Glioblastoma Temozolomide Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Tiagabine HCl Epileptic seizures Tiagabine Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Varenicline Tartrate Smoking cessation Varenicline Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Venlafaxine HCl Depression Venlafaxine Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
23 of the 25 have been tested at Absorption Systems
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 47
Conclusions
Caco-2 Permeability assays can be used to: • Investigate mechanisms of intestinal drug absorption (e.g.,
paracellular vs transcellular or passive diffusion vs transporter-mediated)
• Determine the absorption potential of NMEs
• Rank order sets of compounds to help prioritize resources
• Classify compounds according to BCS to apply for biowaver or guide formulation strategy
• Help identify clinically important transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions (development)
• Evaluate the role of specific excipients in drug absorption
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Obtaining Quality Permeability Data
• Mass balance
• Replicates
• Time points
• Relevant concentrations
• Lack of interactions between test
compound and co-dosed controls
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 50
BCS Studies by Year at Absorption Systems
Unique Compounds Classified: 85 Highly Permeable: 35 (41%)
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 51
Use of BCS by the Pharmaceutical Industry
From 2004-2010, 45 drug products were submitted to the FDA for classification
Adapted from: Mehta, Sept. 2010; AAPS Webinar: Application of Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) in Regulatory Submissions
0
5
10
15
20
25
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
BE
BCS
Adapted from PPB Open Forum 2010 FIP PSWC/AAPS Annual Meeting, Lawrence Yu
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 52
BCS Data Received by FDA for Biowaiver Applications
Caco-2 accounts for ~80% of non-clinical experimental data submitted.
Adapted from: Mehta, Sept. 2010; AAPS Webinar: Application of Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) in Regulatory Submissions
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 53
ADVANTAGES OF IN VITRO BCS STUDIES OVER CLINICAL BE STUDIES
• In vitro studies reduce drug development costs.
• In vitro studies assess drug absorption more directly than human BE studies, for which the approach is indirect and the interpretation often complicated.
• In vitro permeability data is inherently more precise than clinical data. This is especially true for highly variable drugs for which a large number of subjects may be required to adequately power a clinical BE study.
• It is unethical to expose healthy volunteers to NCEs, about which very little is known, considering that a validated in vitro alternative is available.
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 54
•“…when the in vivo dissolution of an IR solid oral dosage form is rapid
in relation to gastric emptying and the drug has high permeability, the
rate and extent of drug absorption is unlikely to be dependent on
drug dissolution and/or gastrointestinal transit time. Under such
circumstances, demonstration of in vivo BA or BE may not be
necessary for drug products containing class I drug substances…”
•FDA Guidance for Industry: Waiver of In Vivo Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification System, CDER 2000.
Rationale for Biowaivers
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Clinical Waiver of Transporter Studies
• EMA Perspective
“…If the permeability in the absence of transporters is high
(> the permeability constant of the highly permeable drug
metoprolol) the effect of active drug transport will be
negligible as compared to the passive concentration-
gradient driven absorption of the drug.”
FDA Perspective
“For drugs that are highly permeable and highly
soluble, the intestinal absorption is not a rate-limiting
step, and, therefore it may be appropriate to exempt
such drugs from the in vivo evaluation with a P-gp or
BCRP inhibitor.”
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
What Does the IPR Mean?
Firm can explore a BCS waiver if the firm believes that a drug product meets BCS class I criteria
Does not mean:
• FDA classifies this as BCS I
• IPR can be used as a basis for requesting a waiver of in vivo BE studies
You need data.
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Aqueous Solubility
Intestinal Absorption
Gastric Dissolution
Scientific Framework for BCS
• Gastric emptying
• Luminal contents
• GI transit time
•Intrinsic membrane
permeability
• Drug dissolution, solubility, and GI permeability are
the fundamental parameters controlling rate and
extent of absorption.
• pH range
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
How is a Biowaiver Possible?
Dn = tres/tdiss Do = Mo/CS x Vo An = Peff x tres / R
• High Permeability
• High Solubility
• Rapid Dissolution
• Solubility does not
limit dissolution or
absorption
• Absorption is not
limited by GI
transit time
• Absorption/gastric
emptying not limited by
dissolution
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Choice of High Permeability Internal Standard (HPIS)
How did you choose your
high permeability internal
standard?
• Common Issues with HPIS:
• High Papp
• Variations with pH
• Misclassification
HPIS AB Papp pH
6.5
AB Papp pH
7.4
%F
Antipyrine 63.44 62.54 100
Metoprolol 11.65 27.88 95
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
pH Considerations: Asymmetry
pH
6.5/7.4
Efflux Ratio
Without
CsA
6.30
With
CsA
7.34
pH gradient may result in pKa-related artifacts
Why use pH 7.4 in the
apical and basolateral
compartments?
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Mass Balance
0
/
CA
VdtdCP rr
app
)(
)(
BAapp
ABapp
P
PR
Underestimated Papp
Exaggerated efflux ratio
FDA expects >80% recovery
Ca
co
-2 P
ap
p (
x 1
0-6
cm
/s)
Provide
intracellular
accumulation data
to demonstrate
mass balance
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 64
Relevant Concentration Range
Test
Compound
Concentration
Efflux Ratio
Permeability
Classificatio
n
10 µM 6.2 Similar
32 µM 1.9 High
100 µM 1.2 High
320 µM 0.9 High • Consider:
• Highest dose per administration vs. highest dose
strength
• Tolerability
• Analytical sensitivity
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Lack of Interaction with Internal Standards
• Phase 1A:
– Test compound codosed
with controls
• Phase 1B:
– Test compound dosed alone
•
Does the test compound impact
permeability of internal standards
and vice versa?
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Papp 33.6
Minoxi
dil
4.33
Atenol
ol
0.26
Efflux
Ratio
1.1
Recove
ry
89%
Extensive Metabolism, High
Variability
• Rapid absorption
• Extensive metabolism
– 29-63% in urine
– 18-38% in feces
• Plasma concentrations of unchanged drug very
low and highly variable (Cmax 1-6 ng/mL, 40-90
min)
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Stability
• Phase 1 and Phase 2 Metabolism
• SGF/SIF
• Pro-drugs
• Additional matrices may be required
• Intestinal brush border membrane
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com 69
Compound Indication FDA Product Recommendation
Tested at Absorption
Systems (AS) Pemeability Classification at AS (High, Low or Not Performed)
BCS Classification by AS Based on Permeability in
Caco-2
BCS Classification based on human PK data or Mass
Balance
Buspirone Anxiety Buspirone Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Capecitabine Colorectal and breast cancers Capecitabine Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Cefadroxil Hemihydrate Antibiotic Cefadroxil Recommendation No NP NP Class I
Donepezil HCl Alzheimer-related dementia Donepezil Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Emtricitabine# HIV Emtricitabine Recommendation No NP NP Class I
Galantamine HBr Alzheimer’s dementia Galantamine Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Granisetron HCl Antiemetic Granisetron Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Levetiracetam Epileptic seizures Levetiracetam Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Levofloxacin Antibiotic Levofloxacin Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Linezolid Antibiotic Linezolid Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Memantine HCl Alzheimer-related dementia Memantine Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Milnacipran HCl Fibromyalgia Milnacipran Recommendation Yes Low* Class III* Class I
Palonosetron HCl Chemotherapy-induced nausea Palonosetron Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Pramipexole Dihydrochloride Parkinson’s disease Pramipexole Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Pregabalin Epileptic seizures Pregabalin Recommendation Yes Low** Class III ** Class I
Propranolol HCl Hypertension, tremors, migraine Propranolol Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Protriptyline HCl Depression Protriptyline Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Ramelteon Insomnia Ramelteon Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Rivastigmine Tartrate Alzheimer-related dementia Rivastigmine Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Sotalol HCl Cardiac arrhythmia Sotalol Recommendation Yes Low*** Class III *** Class I
Tapentadol HCl Pain Tapentadol Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Temozolomide Glioblastoma Temozolomide Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Tiagabine HCl Epileptic seizures Tiagabine Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Varenicline Tartrate Smoking cessation Varenicline Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
Venlafaxine HCl Depression Venlafaxine Recommendation Yes High Class I Class I
23 of the 25 have been tested at Absorption Systems
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Minoxidil C
ac
o-2
Pap
p (
x 1
0-6
cm
/s)
Antipyrine: Papp ~63
Metoprolol: Papp ~28
Pindolol: Papp ~17
Minoxidil: Papp ~4
Papp Recove
ry
Test
Compound
11.8 92.5%
Pindolol 13.9 96.1%
Atenolol 0.21 93.1%
Pindolol is Inadequate Standard
Biowaiver Recommendation in IRP
Absolute BA is 98%
• pH 7.4
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Why Minoxidil?
• At least 95% fraction
absorbed
• Passive transport
• No known food effects
or DDI
• No pH effect
How do you justify using minoxidil
as your high permeability internal
standard?
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com
Absorption: Solubility and Permeability
J = D ∆C
∆x
J= drug flux (mass/area/time)
P= membrane permeability
D = diffusion coefficient
∆x = width of membrane
k = partition coefficient
C = concentration available for transport
P = k • D
∆x
= Co • P
Absorption
Solubility Permeability
© 2011 Absorption Systems
absorption.com YES!
Question… • For a rapidly dissolving IR product with
High permeability
• High solubility
Adequate stability
• Will absorption always be complete?