estate of ong v diaz digest

2
Estate of Ong v. Diaz GR No. 171713, December 17, 2007 Chico-Nazario, J. Petition for Review on Certiorari Facts: Minor Joanne Diaz, represented by her mother Jinky Diaz filed a complaint for compulsory recognition with prayer for support against Rogelio Ong before RTC o February 1993: Jinky married Japanese Hasegawa Katsuo o November 1993: Jinky and Rogelio got acquainted and fell in love o January 1994-September 1998: Jinky and Rogelio cohabited o February 1998: Joanne was born, Rogelio paid all expenses, recognized child as his o September 1998: Rogelio abandoned them and stopped giving support, alleging that he is not the father of the child RTC ordered defendant to recognize plaintiff as natural child and provide monthly support RTC granted Rogelio’s Motion for New Trial (because he was declared in default before) RTC declared Joanne to be the illegitimate child of Rogelio Ong with Jinky Diaz. Support to continue until she reaches majority age. Rogelio appealed to CA but he died in February 2005 during its pendency December 2000: CA granted appeal and remanded case to RTC for the issuance of an order directing the parties to make arrangements for DNA analysis for the purpose of determining the paternity of Joanne Issue: WoN CA erred in remanding the case for DNA analysis despite the fact that it is no longer feasible due to Rogelio’s death Held: No, the death of the petitioner does not ipso facto negate the application of DNA testing for as long as there exist appropriate biological samples of his DNA Even if Rogelio already died, any of his biological samples may be used for DNA testing “Biological sample” means any organic material originating from a person’s body, even if found in inanimate objects, that is susceptible to DNA testing. This includes blood, saliva, and other body fluids, tissues, hairs, and bones.

Upload: gelatin528

Post on 02-Jan-2016

257 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Estate of Ong v Diaz GR No. 171713 December 17, 2007 Digest

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Estate of Ong v Diaz DIGEST

Estate of Ong v. DiazGR No. 171713, December 17, 2007Chico-Nazario, J.

Petition for Review on Certiorari

Facts: Minor Joanne Diaz, represented by her mother Jinky Diaz filed a complaint for

compulsory recognition with prayer for support against Rogelio Ong before RTC

o February 1993: Jinky married Japanese Hasegawa Katsuoo November 1993: Jinky and Rogelio got acquainted and fell in loveo January 1994-September 1998: Jinky and Rogelio cohabitedo February 1998: Joanne was born, Rogelio paid all expenses, recognized

child as hiso September 1998: Rogelio abandoned them and stopped giving support,

alleging that he is not the father of the child RTC ordered defendant to recognize plaintiff as natural child and provide

monthly support RTC granted Rogelio’s Motion for New Trial (because he was declared in

default before) RTC declared Joanne to be the illegitimate child of Rogelio Ong with Jinky Diaz.

Support to continue until she reaches majority age. Rogelio appealed to CA but he died in February 2005 during its pendency December 2000: CA granted appeal and remanded case to RTC for the

issuance of an order directing the parties to make arrangements for DNA analysis for the purpose of determining the paternity of Joanne

Issue: WoN CA erred in remanding the case for DNA analysis despite the fact that it is no longer feasible due to Rogelio’s death

Held: No, the death of the petitioner does not ipso facto negate the application of DNA testing for as long as there exist appropriate biological samples of his DNA

Even if Rogelio already died, any of his biological samples may be used for DNA testing

“Biological sample” means any organic material originating from a person’s body, even if found in inanimate objects, that is susceptible to DNA testing. This includes blood, saliva, and other body fluids, tissues, hairs, and bones.

Death of Rogelio cannot bar the conduct of DNA testing. According to jurisprudence, DNA testing, which examines genetic codes obtained from body cells of the illegitimate child and any physical residue of the long dead parent could be resorted to. (People v. Umanito, citing Tecson v. COMELEC)

Petition denied for lack of merit. CA decision is affirmed.