essentials of teachers rating
TRANSCRIPT
Teacher Classroom Observation Rating Checklist
Information
SY
Semester
Teacher
Position
School
District & Division
Indicators
1st ObservationP US S VS O
2 4 6 8 10
P= PoorUS= Under SatisfactoryS= SatisfactoryVS= Very SatisfactoryO= Outstanding
* 3 observations to get the average.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORSI. CLASSROOM PREPARATION/ MANAGEMENT
II. TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS
III. CLASSROOM INTERACTION
IV. A. OBSERVATION/ ASSESSMENT OF PUPILS
B. TESTS RESULTS
V. OTHER COMMENTS ON THE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION
I. CLASSROOM PREPARATION/
MANAGEMENT1. Classroom was structured to enhance learning
(displays boards, seating arrangements, lights, ventilation, etc.)
2. All necessary visual aid/instructional materials were prepared ahead of time.
3. Board work was prepared before classes started.
4. Teacher was flexible in his/her time management.
5. Maintained order and discipline in the classroom.
II. TEACHING-LEARNING
PROCESS THE TEACHER
1. Clearly formulated the objective of the lesson.
2. Attained the objective of the lesson.
3. Showed proficiency in the required language of instruction.
4. Presented the lesson in a way which captured the interest of the learner.
5. Used real life situations, concrete objects, print and non-print materials in the presentation/ development of the lesson.
6. Considered interweaving of task/ skills/ process and content.
7. Provided meaningful connections between and among learning opportunities, prior knowledge, relevant events and the learner’s lives and experiences.
8. Employed / utilized integrated strategies
________ integration of values in the subject taught
________ integration of Science and Health in concepts in English as content.
________ integration of SK/ HKS concepts in Filipino as content
________ integration of EPP, HKS and MSEP
________ integration across learning areas
9. Provided varied activities to encourage participation of everyone especially the slow learners.
10. Provided varied activities to encourage interactive/ group work cooperative learning.
11. Acted facilitator during class discussion
12. Provided varied learning activities congruent to the objectives of the lesson
13. Recognized pupil’s individual differences and provided activities for:
___________ remediation
___________ reinforcement
___________ enrichment
14. Asked questions that developed critical thinking skills, higher order thinking skills (HOTS) e.g. open-ended questions
15. Gave homework as a follow-up of the lesson
------------ Used textbook/ materials
------------ Used textbook/ materials
clearly/ appropriately
------------ Used instructional materials creatively to get ideas across
16. Showed mastery of the subject matter
The Pupils:
17. Were actively engaged throughout the lesson
18. Asked/ answer questions reflecting Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)
19. Were generally motivated to learn
RATE TEACHING- LEARNING
PROCESS AS A WHOLE IN TERMS OF
INTERACTION
Teacher-Pupil Interaction
Pupil-Pupil Interaction
Pupil-Material Interaction
Learning was evaluated through seatwork exercises/ paper and pencil tests
Learning was evaluated through portfolio assessment
Learners’ other needs were diagnosed after the lesson
The lesson was assessed to determine if the objectives were attained within the allotted time
1. At least 85% passed the test
2. At least 75% passed the test
3. At least 50% passed the test
4. At least 25% passed the test
5. At least 24% or less passed the test
SUMMARY OF RATINGI. Classroom Preparation/ Management
II. Teaching-Learning Process
III. Classroom Interaction
IV. A. Observation/ Assessment of Pupils
B. Test Result
V. OTHER COMMENTS ON THE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION
-OVER-ALL RATING
Rating Scale - Descriptive
Rating
10 - Outstanding/ Excellent
8 - Very Satisfactory/ AA
6 - Satisfactory / Average
4 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Poor