erratum: dielectric function of colloidal lead chalcogenide quantum dots obtained by a...

1
PHYSICAL REVIEW B 88, 079901(E) (2013) Erratum: Dielectric function of colloidal lead chalcogenide quantum dots obtained by a Kramers-Kr¨ onig analysis of the absorbance spectrum [Phys. Rev. B 81, 235319 (2010)] Iwan Moreels, Guy Allan, Bram De Geyter, Ludger Wirtz, Christophe Delerue, and Zeger Hens (Received 29 July 2013; published 7 August 2013) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.079901 PACS number(s): 78.67.Bf, 73.22.f, 77.22.Ch, 78.67.Hc, 99.10.Cd Figure 5(a) in the original article showed the imaginary part of the dielectric function I after normalization (red curve) to one at the peak maximum. However, the normalization was not mentioned in the main text. To allow quantitative interpretation of I , the figure is updated below, and now plots the data against the correct right axis. The conclusions of the article remain unaffected. FIG. 5. (Color online) (a) Comparison of μ and I for typical PbSe Qdots. Inset: Difference δ (meV) between the spectral position of μ and I . [(b)–(d)] I for three Qdot sizes (full lines) superimposed on bulk data (dots) in the case of PbS (b), PbSe (c), and PbTe (d) Qdots. The expansion of Qdot I by bulk values (0–400 nm) is indicated by a gray zone. 079901-1 1098-0121/2013/88(7)/079901(1) ©2013 American Physical Society

Upload: zeger

Post on 27-Jan-2017

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

PHYSICAL REVIEW B 88, 079901(E) (2013)

Erratum: Dielectric function of colloidal lead chalcogenide quantum dots obtained by aKramers-Kronig analysis of the absorbance spectrum [Phys. Rev. B 81, 235319 (2010)]

Iwan Moreels, Guy Allan, Bram De Geyter, Ludger Wirtz, Christophe Delerue, and Zeger Hens(Received 29 July 2013; published 7 August 2013)

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.079901 PACS number(s): 78.67.Bf, 73.22.−f, 77.22.Ch, 78.67.Hc, 99.10.Cd

Figure 5(a) in the original article showed the imaginary part of the dielectric function εI after normalization (red curve) toone at the peak maximum. However, the normalization was not mentioned in the main text. To allow quantitative interpretationof εI , the figure is updated below, and now plots the data against the correct right axis. The conclusions of the article remainunaffected.

FIG. 5. (Color online) (a) Comparison of μ and εI for typical PbSe Qdots. Inset: Difference δ (meV) between the spectral position of μ

and εI . [(b)–(d)] εI for three Qdot sizes (full lines) superimposed on bulk data (dots) in the case of PbS (b), PbSe (c), and PbTe (d) Qdots. Theexpansion of Qdot εI by bulk values (0–400 nm) is indicated by a gray zone.

079901-11098-0121/2013/88(7)/079901(1) ©2013 American Physical Society