erick guerrero-silva, a071 914 925 (bia may 7, 2013)

Upload: immigrant-refugee-appellate-center-llc

Post on 14-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Erick Guerrero-Silva, A071 914 925 (BIA May 7, 2013)

    1/12

    Mller, Judith SeedsLaw Oce of Judith Seeds Mlle300 18th StreetBakesfield, CA 93301

    Name: GUERRERO-SLVA, ERCK

    m

    Executive Oce r Immgraon Reiew

    Board of Immigraion ppealsOce o he Clerk

    507 Lbug ik, Si 000Fl C Vg 2204

    HS/CE Oce o Chef Counsel - ELC1115 N. Imperal Avel Cento CA 92243

    A 071-1425

    Date of this notice 5/7/2013

    nclosed is a copy of he Board's decson and order n he above-reenced case.

    Encosre

    Pl b:M A

    Sncerey,

    D ctDonna Car

    Chief Clerk

    yg k

    Cite as: Erick Guerrero-Silva, A071 914 925 (BIA May 7, 2013)

  • 7/30/2019 Erick Guerrero-Silva, A071 914 925 (BIA May 7, 2013)

    2/12

    US Depaent of usticeExecutive Oce r Imiation Review

    Decisio of te Board oaio Appeals

    Fas Church, Virginia 2204

    Fie: A071 94 925 El Ceno, CA

    In re ERCK GUERRERO-SLVA

    RMOVAL PROCEDNGS

    APPEAL

    Date:

    ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Judi Seeds Miler Equire

    ON BEHALF OF HS:

    APPLICATION: Terminaion

    Jo D. HollidayAis Chief Counse

    MAY -7 20t3

    The responden, a naive and ciizen of Mexico and a awl peanent residen of te UniedSates apeal om he miaion Judge's decision daed November 26, 202 nding imremovabe. he responden's appeal wll be dismissed.

    The responden's appeal is uimey. The responden' Noice of Appeal om a Deciion ofan Iiaion Judge (Form EOR26) must have been received by his Board win 30 days ofthe miation Judge's decision. 8 CF.R. l 003.38(b), (c). The miation udge's deciionwas daed November 26 2012. Thus he responden's Noice of Appeal was due on WenesdayDecember 26, 202. As e responden's Noice of Appeal was received by this Bod on Friday,

    December 27 202 3 day aer the enry of he mgraion Judge' decision, we deem therespondent' appeal uimey

    n s motion o accep lateed Noice of Appeal, e reponden counel providedevidence ha she place te reponden's appeal in te hds of an oveght deivery eice onDecember 24 202. Raher th delivering he appeal o the Board on is guaneed deliverydae, which wa December 26 because e inervenng day was Chrias, he delivery eicedelivered the appeal on December 27.

    Ahough the Bod' lng deadline is no juridicional in he Ninh Circui, IrgoyenBrones v. Holder 644 3d 943 948 (9 Cir. 201), we decine o use our dicretion to accep

    his laeled apeal. Wile he responden missed his appeal deadline by only I day he has noeabised any "rare or "eaordinary evens ha required waiing unil he as day or 2 ofhe manate lng ero ust bere a hiay, a reyng s compeey on he deiverycomy's oveig guaraee The reponden's ituation does no present ecepionalcircumsances. ee Matter ofJ-J, 2 &N Dec. 976 (BIA 1997)

    IrgoyenBrones involved a pro se alien who os is ce bere he miaion Judge usbere Chrisas. The court decribed e subequen days and aced he acivies of the aliend his counse in cncuding a "[b]oh clien and aer aced with reasonabe diligence tocompy wih the ling deadline. IrgoyenBrones v. Holder supra a 950 (the deays invovedeveral hoidays, the need r the alien to raie money the aoey liening o apes of he

    Cite as: Erick Guerrero-Silva, A071 914 925 (BIA May 7, 2013)

  • 7/30/2019 Erick Guerrero-Silva, A071 914 925 (BIA May 7, 2013)

    3/12

    71 914 925

    herigs d reseching he pplicble l ecessy o ule he oice of ppel dpreped he oice ec.); c Mater of Liadov 23 &N ec. 99 A 26) hodig h asho delay by oveg delivery seice is o re or eordiy eve ha ould cosidero of uimey ppe o ceicio) ad sub nom iadov v Muksey,58 F3d 13 8 Ci. 28).

    like he siuaion i Irigoyen-Briones he espodes cousel represeed heespode bere he mmiio Judge d she hs o provided deils regrdig her cliescios or her repesenio oig he mmiio Judges decisio. sho heespode hs o esblished a he d counse ced ih resoble diligece i iigunil he ed of he ig period d relying o he ovegh guee of he deivey seice.

    us he migrio Judges decisio is o nd e record il be eed o emmiio Cou iou he cio. See 8 C.F.R 13.3) 13.38 13.39 124.14ad 124.15. Becuse e re dismissig he ppel s uimely eiher p ishig o le moio i his ce shoud llo he oig guidelies f you ish o le moio orecosider challegig he ding h he appel s uimely you mus le your moio hhe ord. Hoeve if you e chllegig y oher dig or seek o reope your case youmus le you moio ih he mmiio Cour. See Matter of adineo 14 &N ec. 591A 974); Mater of opez 22 &N ec. 16 BA 998). You shoud lso keep in mid hhere re sic ime d umber limis o moios o recoside d moios o reope. Seesecions 24c)6)A) & ) d 24c)7)A) & C of he iio d Nioiy Ac8 S.C. 1229c)6)A) & ) d c)7)A) & C; 8 C.FR. 13.2c)2) 13.23b)).

    ligh of he regoig he lloig order is eered.

    ORR The record is reed o he mmiio Cour ihou he cio

    2

    Cite as: Erick Guerrero-Silva, A071 914 925 (BIA May 7, 2013)

  • 7/30/2019 Erick Guerrero-Silva, A071 914 925 (BIA May 7, 2013)

    4/12

    UNTED STTES DEPRTMENT F JUSTC

    EXECUTVE FFCE FR GRTN REVEW

    UNTED STTES IGRTN CURT

    Fi: 0794-92

    n h Mar of

    ERCK GUERRER-SLV

    RESPNDENT

    L CNTR, CLFRN

    Novmr 6, 202

    N REMVL RCEEDNGS

    CHRGES ion 23a E , in sggng, igraionand Naionaiy N; odgd harg, ion22 a 2 i , admis onrod ssan offns, N22 a C , iii raffking n a onrod ssan ,N

    PPLCTN Trnaion

    N EHF F RESPNDENT JUDT SEES MLLE R, ESQURE, 300 8TSTREET, RFLD, CLFRN 9330

    N EHL F F DHS JN HLLDY, SQURE, NRTH MRLVENUE, E CENTR, CL FR 92243

    RL DECSN F TE MGRTN JUDGE

    Rspondn s an ad an who is a nav and iizn

    of Mxo, and who has n a ga prmann rsidn o

    Unid Sas Th ar s fo afr havng n

    andd y an ordr of h oard of ppas of Jn 4, 20

  • 7/30/2019 Erick Guerrero-Silva, A071 914 925 (BIA May 7, 2013)

    5/12

    a prior haring, fond hat Rspondn was rmovab. h

    oard dtrind that thr wr isss abo th Rspondnts

    "vidn ak of ndrstanding of h nar of h

    prodings, so th ar was randd or an vaation of

    his optny ndr th frawork of Mattr o M---, 2 &N

    D 474 20 .

    Th Rspondnts na omptn has n

    rassssd. ' prsadd that h Rspondnt is omptnt,

    thogh h dos not aways a in his own s intrsts. Th

    iss of omptn onrns tiay whthr h an

    ndrstand h hargs and onsqns of his aions and an

    oopra with his ons in his own dfns. n his as,

    th Rspondnt ary in y viw ndrstands th onsqns.

    H is, to s h trm, ostinat. H rs th ida tha h

    shod ad pon to dfnd hisf agains igration

    hargs. Consqnty, h is noopraiv vn in his own

    dfns ad dision-aking, howvr, dos no man that h is

    a prson who is inoptnt. ndd, think h vidn is

    rpt with h instans of his ar ndrstanding of hs

    prodings I n th prior haring, h mad oions whih

    wr optn obtions H mad omns and obsrvations

    whih wr astt in h irstans. His prostaions,

    whih h ontins to ak ao not ndrstanding, ar spy

    his protstations and his xprssion o otrag of it bing

    ad pon o dfnd hisf in sh irsans. Howvr,

    O?-94-92 2 Novr 26, 202

  • 7/30/2019 Erick Guerrero-Silva, A071 914 925 (BIA May 7, 2013)

    6/12

    i is pain o m a dos indd undrsand naur of

    h prodings of h onsquns of prodings is

    a o oopra, houg i sms ha has no n wiing

    o radily ap hp of his aorny Thus, h is

    ompn.

    h mar was again onsidrd vidn in a

    nus is a h Rspondn appard a h por of nry

    driving is own vhi, wi h ad ownd for 3 yars.

    Srd wiin h d of pikup ruk was driving was

    mor an kios of marijuana h Rspondn has nvr akn

    winss sand o dny ownrsip of i and as rfusd

    o sify undr oa pross a h was xonrad in

    rimina ours. owvr, h was no xonrad Simply,

    as was no pursud H rfuss o no h disinion

    wn h rimina prodings and h igraion

    prodings. n rimina prodings, h Govrnmn mus

    soudr a avy urdn of sowing i is ar yond a

    rasonal dou ha h was guiy of his offns n

    igraion Cour, h Govrnmn mus sow ihr ha hr is

    ar and onvining vidn of his rmovaiiy, or, aus

    of pariuar naur of is as, ha as a onsqun of

    a, hr is rason o liv ha has n a raffikr

    in drugs.

    T Rspondn's as on rmand ook a rain wis

    appars ha h Rspondn appid for nry was akn

    074-2 3 Novr 26, 202

  • 7/30/2019 Erick Guerrero-Silva, A071 914 925 (BIA May 7, 2013)

    7/12

    into stody withot ing admittd H was handd over to th

    athorities for prosetion Prosution was dind. H was

    returnd to th ustody of th order agnts who thn rasd

    him into th Unitd Stats was prsdd thn that th

    spondnt was admittd to th Unitd Stts and ths hargs

    ndr Stion 22 a 2 od no ongr sstained Th

    Govrnmnt had ong go aandond th harg of in smgging.

    Th Govrnmnt threfor odgd yet anothr harg n this

    hrge, th Govrnmnt sys that th spondent is remova

    ase h was inadmissi at th tim of ntry as thre

    was reason to iv that h was traffikr in a ontrod

    sustane See xhiit 3

    timatey, find that this harg an and mst e

    sustaind. The spondnt has inded n found to th

    driver of his own automoie, whih he ownd for 3 yars.

    Thr were mor than kiograms of mariana onead in th

    vehi No expanation has en offrd for how that iiit

    argo fond ts way into his vehi. Knowdg may reasonay

    inferred whn a Respondnt drivs an tomoi adn with

    iega sstanes and th mer possssion of sh a qantity of

    drgs an support an infren of knowdg See

    U S v Qntrorrza, 78 3d 344 9th ir. 99 , ert

    denid 7 S t 3 996 . Th nt worth of the payoad n

    so prmit an infren of knowdg S v Cstro, 972 2d

    07, 9th ir 992

    07-94-92 4 Novmr 26, 202

  • 7/30/2019 Erick Guerrero-Silva, A071 914 925 (BIA May 7, 2013)

    8/12

    h Rspndns as ds prsn an nrsng

    ssu 's ar ha hr was rasn lv a h

    f h spndns arrval ha h had n a raffkr

    n drugs Hwvr, wng h fa ha h was susquny

    add whn h Gvrnmn dd n pursu a as agans h

    afr h rna as was dsssd u nsad allwd h

    n h nd Sas, h ssu hn s wh had knw

    wha and whn Spfay, nfrman has n knwn

    h xanng agns a h rdr whr h Aln sugh

    adssn an prprly rvd and nsdrd y h

    gran Judg whn drmnng whhr hr was rasn

    v h Aln was knwngy ransprng h maruana whn

    h arrvd h nd Sas S G-Grnll v Hdr,

    64 F 3d 826 9h r 20

    Th ssu arss hnk n a slghy dffrn

    nx aus h Rspndn was add and nw w us lk

    akwards hnk hs akwards lk spy rqurs, hugh,

    ha hr has n nfran a h f h Rspndn's

    apd nry whh wuld suppr h vw ha hr s

    rasn lv ha h'd n a raffkr n a nrlld

    susan f urs, suh an nqury ds n rqur ha

    hr a nvn n rdr fr h Rspndn fund

    rval Lopez-Molina v Ashr, 368 F3d 06, 09 9hCr 2007 ; s als Mar f , 6 &N D 8, 84 A

    977

    A07-94-92 Nvr 26, 202

  • 7/30/2019 Erick Guerrero-Silva, A071 914 925 (BIA May 7, 2013)

    9/12

    Mh of h Rspondns pros, hogh, s I no,

    h nvr ook n oh aay, has bn h h didn s h

    sbsn His vis inspion of h sbsn is no of

    i onsqn Th iss is whhr h sbsn

    xisd nd whhr hr is rason o biv h i did.

    Thrs no hng o h drinion ha hr was

    rijn, h i fid-sd posiiv, h i wighd or

    hn 11 kios. onsqny, prsdd by h offirs

    siony nd hir rpors so of rord whih show h hr

    wr indd or hn kios of rin fond in h

    Rspondns vhi.

    Whi i is h brdn of h Govrnn o prov is

    s gins h Rspondn, on h Govrnn os forwrd

    wih vidn spporing is brdn, hn h Rspondn hs h

    brdn of going forwrd wih h vidn o ovro h

    vidn agins hi h Rspondn hs offrd nohing Hs

    rfsd o sify or k h oh. Consqny, h

    Govrns vidn bsiy snds nhngd. This s

    igh b in so wys oprd o riving-son-propry

    ss. Whi i is indd h Govrnns brdn o show h

    h propry is son, h fa h on hs son propry

    wiho ny xpnion an b sffiin in h irsns

    for inding of gi byond a rsonb dob n his as,

    h Rspondn has bn fond o b h drivr of his vhi

    dn s i wr wih or hn 1 kios of arijn H

    071-42 6 Novbr 26 202

  • 7/30/2019 Erick Guerrero-Silva, A071 914 925 (BIA May 7, 2013)

    10/12

    offers no explanation. He simply complains that the proess is

    not fair Therefore, I'm onstrained to find that the

    Government has shown by lear and onvining eidene tat there

    is indeed reason to believe that the Responden has been an

    illiit trafficker in marijuana or has at least been the knowing

    aider, abettor, assster, conspirator, or olluder with others

    He is therefore removable as charged

    The espondent has declined throughout these

    proceedings to seek cancelation of remoal At a hearing on

    November 26, 2012, muh discussion was had with the espondent

    as to the consequenes of what would happen to him While he

    acknowledges that deportation means that he will depart to

    Mexio and be separated from his family, he neertheless refuses

    to undertake any effort to avoid hat consequene Therefore, I

    find that in the end he has knowingly, intelligently, and

    voluntarily waied the opportunity for canellation of removal

    There is no other remedy under the irmstanes

    is role in drug traffking means he aks good moral

    character See Setion O(f) I NA Lacking good moral

    harater, he cannot receive voluntary departure See etion

    240B(b INA Furthermore, he annot adust his status because

    his involvement in drug smuggling is not a single offense which

    involves 30 grams or less o mariuana hus, Section 22(h

    could not waive those grounds of inadmissibility I am unaware

    of any relief that is available in circumstanes suh as these

    07-914-925 7 November 26 2012

  • 7/30/2019 Erick Guerrero-Silva, A071 914 925 (BIA May 7, 2013)

    11/12

    Thror r hvng onsir ll o h vin o ror

    whhr suss ov or no us k h ollowing orr:

    D

    T S HY DD h h sponn mov

    from h ni Ss o Mxio on h sis o h lgions

    in h rgs n h log hrg xh 3}.

    07949

    P1oas se th nt pave r 1crc siqaturA W STATNigrion Jug

    8 Novr 6, 0

  • 7/30/2019 Erick Guerrero-Silva, A071 914 925 (BIA May 7, 2013)

    12/12

    {

    .

    /Is//

    igration Judge JACK W SAONstatonj on Febrary 13, 2013 at 4:28 PM GMT

    A?l-914925 9 Novembe 26 202