epilepsy and tsc2 haploinsufficiency lead to autistic-like social deficit behaviors in rats
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Epilepsy and Tsc2 Haploinsufficiency Lead to Autistic-Like Social Deficit Behaviors in Rats](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022080105/57502c411a28ab877ed589ab/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Epilepsy and Tsc2 Haploinsufficiency Lead to Autistic-Like SocialDeficit Behaviors in Rats
Robert Waltereit • Birte Japs • Miriam Schneider •
Petrus J. de Vries • Dusan Bartsch
Received: 21 July 2010 / Accepted: 16 September 2010 / Published online: 7 October 2010
� Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010
Abstract There is a strong association between autism
spectrum disorders (ASD), epilepsy and intellectual dis-
ability in humans, but the nature of these correlations is
unclear. The monogenic disorder Tuberous Sclerosis
Complex (TSC) has high rates of ASD, epilepsy and cog-
nitive deficits. Here we used the Tsc2?/- (Eker) rat model of
TSC and an experimental epilepsy paradigm to study the
causal effect of seizures on learning and memory and social
behavior phenotypes. Status epilepticus was induced by
kainic acid injection at P7 and P14 in wild-type and Tsc2?/-
rats. At the age of 3–6 months, adult rats were assessed in
the open field, light/dark box, fear conditioning, Morris
water maze, novel object recognition and social interaction
tasks. Learning and memory was unimpaired in naıve
Tsc2?/- rats, and experimental epilepsy did not impair any
aspects of learning and memory in either wild-type or
Tsc2?/- rats. In contrast, rearing in the open field, novel
object exploration and social exploration was reduced in
naıve Tsc2?/- rats. Seizures induced anxiety and social
evade, and reduced social exploration and social contact
behavior in wild-type and Tsc2?/- rats. Our study shows
that Tsc2 haploinsufficiency and developmental status epi-
lepticus in wild-type and Tsc2?/- rats independently lead to
autistic-like social deficit behaviors. The results suggest that
the gene mutation may be sufficient to lead to some social
deficits, and that seizures have a direct and additive effect to
increase the likelihood and range of autistic-like behaviors.
Keywords Tuberous sclerosis � Autism � Mental
retardation � Epilepsy � Animal models
Introduction
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are characterized by
qualitative abnormalities in reciprocal social interaction,
communication, and repetitive and stereotyped patterns of
behavior. Epilepsy is seen in about 30% of individuals with
ASD. Conversely, in epilepsy populations there is an ASD
prevalence of about 32%. In spite of this strong correlation,
there is so far little experimental evidence for any direct
causal relationship between seizures and ASD (Clarke et al.
2005; Spence and Schneider 2009).
Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) is caused by het-
erozygous mutation in either the TSC1 or TSC2 gene.
About 25% of individuals with TSC meet criteria for
Edited by Pierre Roubertoux.
Robert Waltereit, Birte Japs contributed equally.
Petrus J. de Vries, Dusan Bartsch—Joint senior authorship.
R. Waltereit (&) � B. Japs � D. Bartsch
Department of Molecular Biology, Central Institute of Mental
Health and University of Heidelberg, Mannheim Medical
Faculty, J 5, 68159 Mannheim, Germany
e-mail: [email protected]
R. Waltereit
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute
of Mental Health and University of Heidelberg, Mannheim
Medical Faculty, Mannheim, Germany
M. Schneider
Department of Psychopharmacology, Central Institute of Mental
Health and University of Heidelberg, Mannheim Medical
Faculty, Mannheim, Germany
P. J. de Vries
Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust,
Cambridge, UK
P. J. de Vries
Developmental Psychiatry Section, University of Cambridge,
Cambridge, UK
123
Behav Genet (2011) 41:364–372
DOI 10.1007/s10519-010-9399-0
![Page 2: Epilepsy and Tsc2 Haploinsufficiency Lead to Autistic-Like Social Deficit Behaviors in Rats](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022080105/57502c411a28ab877ed589ab/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
classic infantile autism, about 50% for ASD, and 70–90%
have a lifetime history of epilepsy (Smalley 1998; Bolton
et al. 2002). Approximately 30–40% of TSC patients have
global intellectual disability (IQ \ 70) (Joinson et al.
2003). When the total TSC population is studied, epilepsy
shows strong correlations with intellectual disability and
ASD (Smalley 1998; Gomez et al. 1999; de Vries et al.
2007).
Animal models reduce the complex scenarios of neu-
ropsychiatric disorders to more simply defined variables
and are as such useful to study mechanisms of pathology
(Fisch 2007). To date, three TSC animal models, Tsc1?/-,
Tsc2?/- knockout mice and spontaneous mutation Tsc2?/-
(Eker) rats (Eker and Mossige 1961), have been analyzed
for the neurobiological basis of behavioral phenotypes.
None of the models exhibit spontaneous seizure activity.
Although there is substantial variation between the differ-
ent animals, all models express changes in learning and
memory with the Tsc1?/- mice showing deficits in social
behavior as well (Waltereit et al. 2006; Goorden et al.
2007; Ehninger et al. 2008). Taking together the current
human and animal data, results suggest that seizures may
not be necessary to cause ASD (de Vries and Howe 2007;
Goorden et al. 2007), and that there might be direct genetic
effects (Smalley 1998; de Vries and Howe 2007). How-
ever, social deficits have only been reported in one TSC
animal model (Goorden et al. 2007), and it is not known
whether seizures may be sufficient to cause social deficit
behaviors in TSC or animal models (Spence and Schneider
2009).
To examine the effect of TSC genotype and epilepsy on
learning and memory and social behaviors, we studied
Tsc2?/- (Eker) and wild-type rats. To examine the impact
of seizures during development, we treated wild-type and
Tsc2?/- rats with kainic acid (KA) injections at postnatal
day 7 (P7) and P14. All animals responded with a typical
crescendo-like status epilepticus that lasted many hours
(Sayin et al. 2004). Animals of all four groups (naıve wild-
type; naıve Tsc2?/-; epilepsy wild-type; epilepsy Tsc2?/-)
were analyzed for behavioral changes at the age of
3–6 months (Fig. 1).
Experimental procedures
Animals
Rats were housed under a 12 h/12 h day–night cycle. Only
male rats were used for experiments. Tsc2?/- (Eker) and
wild-type genotypes were determined by PCR (Rennebeck
et al. 1998). In all experiments, littermates with similar
distribution to Tsc2?/- (Eker) and wild-type were used. All
testing took place during the day phase. All experimental
procedures were performed according to permission from
local state authorities (Regierungsprasidium Karlsruhe).
KA-induced status epilepticus
KA monohydrate (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany) was dis-
solved in phosphate-buffered saline. At P7, male offspring
received an intraperitoneal injection with 3 mg/kg KA, and
at P14, a second injection with 4 mg/kg KA. The animals
were returned to the home cage with their mother. About
15 min after injection, a crescendo-like status epilepticus
started in all injected animals, and lasted for several hours.
For this study, always a Tsc2?/- parent was crossed with a
wild-type parent. During the first status epilepticus, there
was 17.5% mortality, during the second one, there was no
mortality. Of the animals surviving the epilepsy paradigm,
39% revealed the Tsc2?/- (Eker) mutation after genotyping;
of all naıve rats, 44% were Tsc2?/-. Late-onset seizures were
observed neither during animal care nor behavioral analysis.
Open field
The arena had an area of 52 9 52 cm2, a height of 45 cm
and was made of grey polyvinylchloride (PVC). Light
intensity was 50 lux. Movements were recorded with a
digital video camera and analyzed on a personal computer
using Biobserve Viewer (Biobserve, Bonn, Germany)
tracking software. Rearings were detected by light barriers
at a height of 11 cm. At the beginning of the 30 min ses-
sion, animals were placed in the center of the arena. Data
were analyzed as 5 min bins.
Light/dark-box
The apparatus had an area of 75 9 25 cm2, a height of
40 cm and was made of grey PVC. The dark compartment
had an area of 25 9 25 cm2, was separated from the light
compartment by a grey PVC wall with a 10 cm wide,
15 cm high alleyway and was covered by a grey PVC plate.
The light compartment was illuminated with 100 lux. Rats
were initially placed in the dark, closed compartment and
allowed to habituate for 1 min to the apparatus. The
alleyway was then opened, movements in the light
Fig. 1 Experimental design. Tsc2?/- and wild-type rats were chal-
lenged with status epilepticus by KA injections at P7 and P14. Naıve
rats had not undergone the epilepsy paradigm. Behavior was analyzed
at the age of 3–6 months
Behav Genet (2011) 41:364–372 365
123
![Page 3: Epilepsy and Tsc2 Haploinsufficiency Lead to Autistic-Like Social Deficit Behaviors in Rats](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022080105/57502c411a28ab877ed589ab/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
compartment were recorded with a digital video camera for
10 min and analyzed manually by a trained observer.
Novel object recognition
Behavior was recorded with a digital video camera and
analyzed manually by a trained and blinded observer
(Schneider et al. 2008). Objects were made of metal or glass
and existed in duplicate. Rats were habituated to the open
field for 10 min, 24 h before behavioral testing. The test
consisted of an initial 3-min sample phase (P1) and a 3-min
discrimination phase (P2) that were separated either by an
intertrial interval of 15 min or by an interval of 24 h. During
P1, the rat was placed in the centre of the open field and
exposed to an unknown object (A). After cessation of P1 the
rat was returned to the homecage and the object was removed.
The rat was placed back in the open field after 15 min or 24 h
for object discrimination during P2 and was then exposed to
the familiar object (A0, an identical copy of the object pre-
sented in P1) and a novel test object (B). Exploration of the
objects (sniffing, touching and gnawing) was recorded during
P1 and P2. Sitting beside or standing on top of the objects was
not scored as object investigation. Testing for the 15 min
interval was done 1 day before the 24 h interval test and
different objects were used for both tests.
Fear conditioning and extinction
The apparatus and tracking system was as described earlier
(Waltereit et al. 2008), with the exception of using a
chamber designed for rats as context A, area 25 9 30 cm2,
height 33 cm (H10-11R-TC, Coulbourn Instruments,
Allentown, GA, USA). Context B was a standard home
cage without litter. The conditioned stimulus (CS) was a
5000 Hz sinus wave of 30 s duration. The unconditioned
stimulus (UCS) was a scrambled footshock of 0.5 mA and
1 s duration, which was applied during the last second of
the CS. Day 1: Habituation. 10 min exploration in context
A. Day 2: Conditioning in context A. 3 min exploration,
30 s CS-UCS, 3 min exploration, 30 s CS-UCS, 3 min
exploration. Day 3: Recall of conditioning. 6 min explo-
ration in context A, 1 h interval, 3 min exploration in
context B, 3 min exploration in context B with CS. Day 4:
Extinction. 3 min exploration in context A, followed by 15
times 30 s CS and 3 min exploration in context A. Day 5:
Recall of extinction. Recall of conditioning. 6 min explo-
ration in context A, 1 h interval, 3 min exploration in
context B, 3 min exploration in context B with CS.
Morris water maze
The pool had a diameter of 145 cm, a height of 50 cm and
was made from black PVC. Rats were trained in the water
maze with extra-maze cues (water made opaque by addi-
tion of 3 L milk, water temperature 26 ± 1�C,
10 9 10 cm2 platform with white rubber surface, height of
the platform 13 cm with its top surface 2 cm below water
level, maximum trial duration 120, 15 s on platform at the
end of trials). Illumination was 30 lux. Animals were
trained for 5 days three times a day with 2 h intervals
(Waltereit et al. 2006). After a total of 15 training trials, the
probe trial was performed with the platform removed
(probe trial duration = 60 s). During training trials, ani-
mals were assessed for the latency to escape to the hidden
platform. During the probe trial, animals were assessed for
the time spent in the four quadrants and for the frequency
with which they crossed the position of the platform in the
target quadrant (and the respective position in the three
non-target quadrants). Swim paths were recorded using the
EthoVision video tracking system (Noldus Information
Technology, Wageningen, The Netherlands).
Social interaction
The test was performed in the open field (Schneider et al.
2008). Social partners were 6 week old male Long-Evans
rats (Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany). All animals were
habituated for 5 min to the arena 24 h before testing. The
experimental animal was first placed into the test arena and
was allowed to habituate for 1 min before the social partner
was introduced. The following behavioral elements were
videotaped and quantified by a trained and blinded obser-
ver only for the experimental rats: (A) Social behavior:
contact behavior, social exploration and approach/follow-
ing were scored as social behaviors. (1) Contact behavior:
contact behavior includes (a) grooming (chewing and
licking the partner’s fur) and (b) crawling over/under the
partner; (2) social exploration: (a) anogenital investigation
(sniffing or licking the anogenital area of the social partner)
and (b) non-anogenital investigation (sniffing at any part of
the partner’s body, except the anogenital area); (3)
approach/following: approaching or following the social
partner in the test arena. (B) Evade: running, leaping or
swerving away from the social partner. Evade, which is
normally defined as a defensive behavior in the context of
social play, was scored in the social interaction test as an
active withdrawal from social contact.
Statistics
Analyzes (two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or two-
way repeated measures ANOVA, respectively, followed by
Bonferroni post-hoc tests) were performed with SigmaStat
software (Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA). Differ-
ences were considered statistically significant if P \ 0.05.
Graphical artwork was created with Prism (GraphPad
366 Behav Genet (2011) 41:364–372
123
![Page 4: Epilepsy and Tsc2 Haploinsufficiency Lead to Autistic-Like Social Deficit Behaviors in Rats](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022080105/57502c411a28ab877ed589ab/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Software, San Diego, CA; USA) and CorelDraw software
(Corel Corporation, Ottawa, Canada). Graphs always show
mean, standard error of the mean (SEM) and significant
results from the two-way ANOVA or two-way repeated
measures ANOVA, respectively. Significant results from
Bonferroni post-hoc tests are indicated in the graphs as
well. One asterisk in a graph represents P \ 0.05, two
asterisks P \ 0.01, three asterisks P \ 0.001.
Results
We first evaluated general behavioral parameters. Loco-
motor activity was assessed in the open field. There were
no differences in distance travelled over time (Fig. 2a, two-
way repeated measures ANOVA for experimental groups
[F(3,230) = 0.9826, P [ 0.05], time [F(5,230) = 190.2,
P \ 0.001] and interaction [F(15,230) = 0.3975, P [ 0.05]),
but Tsc2?/- rats showed less rearings than wild-type animals
(Fig. 2b, two-way ANOVA for genotype [F(1,46) = 4.320,
P \ 0.05], epilepsy [F(1,46) = 1,293, P [ 0.05] and inter-
action [F(1,46) = 0.07021, P [ 0.05]). Anxiety was ana-
lyzed using the light/dark-box. The latency to enter the light
compartment was longer in rats which had undergone the
epilepsy paradigm (Fig. 2c, two-way ANOVA for genotype
[F(1,52) = 0.5466, P [ 0.05], epilepsy [F(1,52) = 4.941,
P \ 0.05] and interaction [F(1,52) = 0.4554, P [ 0.05]).
Next, we examined novel object recognition and explora-
tion. All animals spent a higher proportion of time exploring
the novel objects during the recall phase, indicating that they
recognized the previously presented object, and there were
no differences between experimental groups after an interval
of 15 min (Fig. 3a, two-way ANOVA for genotype
[F(1,52) = 0.04816, P [ 0.05], epilepsy [F(1,52) = 0.1031,
P [ 0.05] and interaction [F(1,52) = 0.02086, P [ 0.05])
and an interval of 24 h (Fig. 3b, two-way ANOVA for
genotype [F(1,54) = 0.5534, P [ 0.05], epilepsy [F(1,54) =
0.001447, P [ 0.05] and interaction [F(1,54) = 0.08213,
P [ 0.05]). However, Tsc2?/- rats spent less time than wild-
type animals exploring novel objects during the acquisition
phase (Fig. 3c, two-way ANOVA for genotype [F(1,54) =
5.732, P \ 0.05], epilepsy [F(1,54) = 0.01435, P [ 0.05]
and interaction [F(1,54) = 0.5991, P [ 0.05]).
We then started a series of experiments to assess
learning and memory. Fear conditioning is a form of
classical conditioning. Our protocol tested both contextual
and auditory cue conditioning, and also analyzed extinction
of these memories. After conditioning with two CS-UCS
presentations, all rats demonstrated learning of both con-
textual (Fig. 4a, two-way ANOVA for genotype [F(1,51) =
0.04820, P [ 0.05], epilepsy [F(1,51) = 0.08456, P [ 0.05]
and interaction [F(1,51) = 0.9020, P [ 0.05]) and auditory
cue associations (Fig. 4c, two-way ANOVA for experi-
mental group [F(3,100) = 0.1168, P [ 0.05], auditory cue
[F(1,100) = 84.68, P \ 0.001] and interaction [F(3,100) =
0.1482, P [ 0.05]). There were no differences between
experimental groups. After extinction of the associa-
tions by presenting the CS without UCS for 1 h, rats
showed some reduction in both contextual (Fig. 4b, two-
way ANOVA for genotype [F(1,51) = 2.308, P [ 0.05],
epilepsy [F(1,51) = 0.3967, P [ 0.05] and interaction
Fig. 2 Tsc2?/- reduces exploratory behavior and developmental
epilepsy increases anxiety. a Distance travelled in the open field.
Wild-type naıve n = 16, Tsc2?/- naıve n = 13, wild-type epilepsy
n = 12, Tsc2?/- epilepsy n = 9. b Rearings in the open field. Wild-
type naıve n = 16, Tsc2?/- naıve n = 13, wild-type epilepsy n = 12,
Tsc2?/- epilepsy n = 9. c Latency to light in the light/dark-box.
Wild-type naıve n = 16, Tsc2?/- naıve n = 13, wild-type epilepsy
n = 15, Tsc2?/- epilepsy n = 12. Data are expressed as mean and
(b, c) SEM. * P \ 0.05
Behav Genet (2011) 41:364–372 367
123
![Page 5: Epilepsy and Tsc2 Haploinsufficiency Lead to Autistic-Like Social Deficit Behaviors in Rats](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022080105/57502c411a28ab877ed589ab/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
[F(1,51) = 0.0000205, P [ 0.05]) and auditory cue condit-
ionings (Fig. 4d, two-way ANOVA for experimental group
[F(3,100) = 0.6257, P [ 0.05], auditory cue [F(1,100) =
47.11, P \ 0.001] and interaction [F(3,100) = 0.02162,
P [ 0.05]), but there were no differences between groups.
The Morris water maze tests spatial memory, a form of
hippocampus-dependent learning. There were no differ-
ences in latency to escape to the platform during training
trials (Fig. 5a, two-way repeated measures ANOVA for
experimental groups [F(3,700) = 1.390, P [ 0.05], trials
[F(14,700) = 52.61, P \ 0.001] and interaction [F(42,700) =
1.103, P [ 0.05]). During a probe trial after the last
training trial, we analyzed swimming in the target quad-
rant (Fig. 5b, two-way ANOVA for experimental group
[F(3,100) = 0.1293, P [ 0.05], target [F(1,100) = 22.07, P \0.001] and interaction [F(3,100) = 0.6895, P [ 0.05]) and
swimming over the target platform position (Fig. 5c, two-
way ANOVA for experimental group [F(3,54) = 0.2630,
P [ 0.05], target [F(1,54) = 34.55, P \ 0.001] and inter-
action [F(3,54) = 0.3329, P [ 0.05]). All animals had
learned to search in the target region, and there were no
differences between groups. Swim speeds during the probe
trial were without differences between groups (mean ±
SEM): Wild-type naıve 20.58 cm/s ± 1.33, Tsc2?/- naıve
20.19 cm/s ± 1.44, wild-type epilepsy 20.92 cm/s ± 1.16,
Tsc2?/- epilepsy 20.25 cm/s ± 0.43. Wild-type naıve
n = 8, Tsc2?/- naıve n = 7, wild-type epilepsy n = 8,
Tsc2?/- epilepsy n = 8. Two-way ANOVA for genotype
[F(1,27) = 0.6446, P [ 0.05], epilepsy [F(1,27) = 0.8616,
P [ 0.05] and interaction [F(1,27) = 0.9019, P [ 0.05].
Finally, we performed a series of experiments to assess
various social behaviors in the open field with a young
adolescent wild-type rat as social partner. Firstly, social
exploration was examined using anogenital and non-ano-
genital exploration and approach & follow behaviors.
Summary scores of these three social exploration tasks
showed that naıve Tsc2?/- rats had reduced social behav-
iors (Fig. 6a) and that epilepsy induced reduction in social
exploration behaviors in the wild-type rats to rates similar
to the naıve Tsc2?/- rats (Fig. 6a, two-way ANOVA for
genotype [F(1,27) = 3.201, P [ 0.05], epilepsy [F(1,27) =
6.691, P \ 0.05] and interaction [F(1,27) = 1.923,
P [ 0.05], significant Bonferroni post-hoc tests: epilepsy
within wild-type P \ 0.01, genotype within naıve
P \ 0.05). These differences were predominantly attribut-
able to reduction in non-anogenital exploration (Fig. 6b,
two-way ANOVA for genotype [F(1,27) = 0.9666, P [0.05], epilepsy [F(1,27) = 0.9666, P [ 0.05] and interaction
[F(1,27) = 1.223, P [ 0.05]) rather than to significant
change in anogenital (Fig. 6c, two-way ANOVA for
genotype [F(1,27) = 2.839, P [ 0.05], epilepsy [F(1,27) =
16.35, P \ 0.001] and interaction [F(1,27) = 1.527,
P [ 0.05], significant Bonferroni post-hoc tests: epilepsy
within wild-type P \ 0.001) or approach and follow
behaviors (Fig. 6d, two-way ANOVA for genotype [F(1,27)
= 3.073, P [ 0.05], epilepsy [F(1,27) = 1.073, P [ 0.05]
and interaction [F(1,27) = 1.115, P [ 0.05]). Next we
examined social evade and contact behavior. Social evade
is the active avoidance of contact with the social partner.
Naıve rats in both groups showed similarly low rates of
evade. Rats which had undergone the epilepsy paradigm
Fig. 3 Novel object recognition. a Novel object preference (15 min
interval). Wild-type naıve n = 15, Tsc2?/- (Eker) naıve n = 12,
wild-type epilepsy n = 17, Tsc2?/- (Eker) epilepsy n = 12. b Novel
object preference (24 h interval). Wild-type naıve n = 16, Tsc2?/-
(Eker) naıve n = 13, wild-type epilepsy n = 17, Tsc2?/- (Eker)
epilepsy n = 12. c Object exploration time (mean values from
animals used both 15 min and 24 h interval experiments). Wild-type
naıve n = 16, Tsc2?/- naıve n = 13, wild-type epilepsy n = 17,
Tsc2?/- epilepsy n = 12. Data are expressed as mean and SEM.
* P \ 0.05
368 Behav Genet (2011) 41:364–372
123
![Page 6: Epilepsy and Tsc2 Haploinsufficiency Lead to Autistic-Like Social Deficit Behaviors in Rats](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022080105/57502c411a28ab877ed589ab/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
showed increased social evade (Fig. 6e, two-way ANOVA
for genotype [F(1,27) = 2.467, P [ 0.05], epilepsy [F(1,27)
= 15.97, P \ 0.001] and interaction [F(1,27) = 1.471,
P [ 0.05], significant Bonferroni post-hoc tests: epilepsy
within Tsc2?/- P \ 0.01). Contact behavior is a further
type of normal social interaction in rodents. Epilepsy also
reduced contact behavior in wild-type and Tsc2?/- rats
(Fig. 6f, two-way ANOVA for genotype [F(1,27) =
0.008507, P [ 0.05], epilepsy [F(1,27) = 9.642, P \ 0.01]
and interaction [F(1,27) = 0.1144, P [ 0.05], significant
Bonferroni post-hoc tests: epilepsy within wild-type
P \ 0.05).
Discussion
Our study revealed that neither the Tsc2?/- (Eker) muta-
tion, KA-induced status epilepticus at P7 and P14 nor
combination of these paradigms induced learning and
memory deficits in rats. However, both the Tsc2?/-
mutation and the epilepsy paradigm independently caused
autistic-like social deficit behaviors with reduced novel
object, environmental and social exploration behaviors in
the naıve Tsc2?/- rat, and increased anxiety, social evade,
reduced social exploration and contact behavior in Tsc2?/-
and wild-type rats after experimental epilepsy.
The epilepsy paradigm induced status epilepticus on two
separate occasions for several hours during development.
Late-onset seizures were observed neither during animal
care nor behavioral analysis. We did not assess the animals
by electroencephalography (EEG) or electrocorticography
(ECoG) to detect subtle or non-convulsive epileptic dis-
charges during adult age. However, because the epilepsy
paradigm did not induce any learning and memory deficits,
it seems unlikely that long-lasting or late-onset epileptic
activity confounded the other results.
The findings for the naıve Tsc2?/- rats are in agreement
with our previous study, which found no learning and
memory deficits in conditioned taste aversion, radial maze
and the Morris water maze (Waltereit et al. 2006). Sur-
prisingly, the experimental epilepsy paradigm did not
induce learning and memory deficits. This is in contrast to
a similar study which made also use of a status epilepticus
paradigm (Sayin et al. 2004). The latter study used
Fig. 4 Fear conditioning and extinction are not altered. a Freezing
after contextual conditioning. Wild-type naıve n = 16, Tsc2?/- naıve
n = 13, wild-type epilepsy n = 15, Tsc2?/- epilepsy n = 11.
b Freezing after extinction of contextual conditioning. Wild-type
naıve n = 16, Tsc2?/- naıve n = 13, wild-type epilepsy n = 15,
Tsc2?/- epilepsy n = 11. c Freezing after auditory cue conditioning.
Wild-type naıve n = 16, Tsc2?/- naıve n = 13, wild-type epilepsy
n = 15, Tsc2?/- epilepsy n = 11. d Freezing after extinction of
auditory cue conditioning. Wild-type naıve n = 16, Tsc2?/- naıve
n = 13, wild-type epilepsy n = 15, Tsc2?/- epilepsy n = 11. Data
are expressed as mean and SEM
Behav Genet (2011) 41:364–372 369
123
![Page 7: Epilepsy and Tsc2 Haploinsufficiency Lead to Autistic-Like Social Deficit Behaviors in Rats](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022080105/57502c411a28ab877ed589ab/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Sprague–Dawley rats (Dr. Stafstrom, personal communi-
cation), whereas our rats were bred on Long-Evans back-
ground. Thus, strain differences may explain the discrepant
findings for wild-type rats. Learning and memory deficits
in rats are not an equivalent of global intellectual disability
in TSC patients. Nevertheless, it is surprising that the
combination of Tsc2 haploinsufficiency and developmental
seizures did not result in any learning and memory deficits.
Global intellectual deficit in TSC (de Vries and Prather
2007) is strongly associated with prolonged seizures,
infantile spasms (Joinson et al. 2003; O’Callaghan et al.
2004) and onset of seizures in the first year of life (Jozwiak
et al. 1998; Gomez et al. 1999; Bolton et al. 2002; Curatolo
et al. 2008). An explanation for the discrepancy between
these TSC patients and our model could lie in the duration,
type or developmental timepoint of the experimental sei-
zures. We therefore acknowledge the possibility that the
epilepsy paradigm used here may not have been of suffi-
cient duration or intensity to induce global intellectual
impairment, that KA-induced status epilepticus may not
model the pathology of infantile spasms adequately, and
that the time point of epilepsy induction could also have
been too late in development given, that P7 and P14 in rats
is later in brain development than seizures during the first
6–12 months of human life. These would be important
experimental parameters to modify in future studies.
Our experiments focused on social interaction and
anxiety-related behaviors rather than on communication or
repetitive and stereotyped patterns of behavior, the other
two diagnostic domains of ASD (Tordjman et al. 2007;
Viding and Blakemore 2007). Tsc2?/- rats displayed
reduced exploratory behaviors. In the open field, Tsc2?/-
rats exhibited less rearings, which can be interpreted as
reduced exploration of the environment, given that loco-
motor behavior was unchanged. Object exploration time in
the novel object recognition task was reduced. Naıve
Tsc2?/- rats also showed less social exploration. In a
similar pattern, Tsc1?/- KO mice showed less interaction
with a social partner and reduced nest building behavior,
interpreted as analogous to autistic-like behavior in patients
with TSC (Goorden et al. 2007). In contrast, Tsc2?/- KO
mice were not impaired in exploration and social behavior
tests, which was explained by a modifier gene hypothesis
(Ehninger et al. 2008). In the light/dark-box, wild-type and
Tsc2?/- rats which had undergone the epilepsy paradigm
expressed increased anxiety. The study by Sayin and col-
leagues which made similar use of KA-induced status
epilepticus during development, also described increased
anxiety in adult rats in the elevated plus maze (Sayin et al.
2004). The social interaction test is a test traditionally used
to study anxiety-related behavior in animals due to its
sensitivity to both anxiolytic and anxiogenic effects (File
2000; File et al. 2001; Irvine et al. 2001) and is therefore
thought to present a model of social anxiety in humans
(File and Hyde 1978). In humans, social anxiety and ASD
are often seen in conjunction (Moldin and Rubenstein
2006). Moreover, impaired reciprocal social interaction is a
core deficit in ASD. These tests are therefore recognized as
ASD phenotype tasks (Crawley 2007; Moy et al. 2007).
The epilepsy paradigm reduced social exploration in adult
rats. In addition, social evade and contact behavior tasks
also showed significant impairments induced by the epi-
lepsy paradigm. This reduction might thus be related to the
Fig. 5 No learning and memory deficit in the Morris water maze.
a Latency to platform during training trials. Wild-type naıve n = 15,
Tsc2?/- naıve n = 13, wild-type epilepsy n = 14, Tsc2?/- epilepsy
n = 12. b Time in quadrants during probe trial. Wild-type naıve
n = 15, Tsc2?/- naıve n = 13, wild-type epilepsy n = 14, Tsc2?/-
epilepsy n = 12. c Platform crossings during probe trial. Wild-type
naıve n = 8, Tsc2?/- naıve n = 7, wild-type epilepsy n = 8, Tsc2?/-
epilepsy n = 8. Data are expressed as mean and SEM
370 Behav Genet (2011) 41:364–372
123
![Page 8: Epilepsy and Tsc2 Haploinsufficiency Lead to Autistic-Like Social Deficit Behaviors in Rats](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022080105/57502c411a28ab877ed589ab/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
increased anxiety-related response towards the unfamiliar
social partner, but it could also indicate a general perfor-
mance deficit in appropriate social behavior. Taken toge-
ther, both Tsc2 haploinsufficiency and epilepsy
independently lead to autistic-like social deficits. It is of
note that the nature of social deficits was not identical in
the Tsc2?/- and developmental epilepsy groups. In the
human ASD literature, there have been suggestions of
subtle phenotypic differences between ASD with and
without epilepsy. Children with ASD and epilepsy, for
instance, showed significantly reduced social interaction
with peers of a similar age (Turk et al. 2009). We suggest
that in TSC the neurobiological abnormalities caused by
gene mutation may be sufficient to lead to some autistic-
like social deficit behaviors, and that seizures may have a
direct and additive effect by inducing further social deficits
to increase the likelihood and range of autistic-like
behaviors.
The apparent dissociation between learning and memory
and social deficits is of further interest. The results suggest
the possibility of a differential threshold of vulnerability—
that is, fewer seizures may be required to induce social
deficits and that more, prolonged or developmentally ear-
lier seizures may be required to lead to learning and
memory deficits. Returning to ASD, our results suggest that
epilepsy in general may induce social, but not necessarily
learning and memory deficits in individuals who have ASD
or who are at risk of ASD. This may help to explain the
increased rates of ASD in epilepsy populations and the
significantly increased rates of ASD in those with genetic
syndromes associated with a high risk of ASD.
Acknowledgments This work was supported by research grants
from Tuberose Sklerose Deutschland to R.W. and Deutsche For-
schungsgemeinschaft SFB 636 to D.B. The authors would like to
thank Lena Wendler for excellent technical support and Dr. Mathias
Zink for help with an initial experiment.
Fig. 6 Tsc2?/- and developmental epilepsy lead to deficits in social
behavior. a Total social exploration (total of b–d). Wild-type naıve
n = 8, Tsc2?/- naıve n = 7, wild-type epilepsy n = 8, Tsc2?/-
epilepsy n = 8. b Anogenital exploration. Wild-type naıve n = 8,
Tsc2?/- (Eker) naıve n = 7, wild-type epilepsy n = 8, Tsc2?/-
(Eker) epilepsy n = 8. c Non-anogenital exploration. Wild-type naıve
n = 8, Tsc2?/- (Eker) naıve n = 7, wild-type epilepsy n = 8,
Tsc2?/- (Eker) epilepsy n = 8. d Approach and follow. Wild-type
naıve n = 8, Tsc2?/- (Eker) naıve n = 7, wild-type epilepsy n = 8,
Tsc2?/- (Eker) epilepsy n = 8. e Social evade. Wild-type naıve
n = 8, Tsc2?/- naıve n = 7, wild-type epilepsy n = 8, Tsc2?/-
epilepsy n = 8. f Contact behavior. Wild-type naıve n = 8, Tsc2?/-
naıve n = 7, wild-type epilepsy n = 8, Tsc2?/- epilepsy n = 8. Data
are expressed as mean and SEM. * P \ 0.05, ** P \ 0.01,
*** P \ 0.001
Behav Genet (2011) 41:364–372 371
123
![Page 9: Epilepsy and Tsc2 Haploinsufficiency Lead to Autistic-Like Social Deficit Behaviors in Rats](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022080105/57502c411a28ab877ed589ab/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
References
Bolton PF, Park RJ, Higgins JN, Griffiths PD, Pickles A (2002)
Neuro-epileptic determinants of autism spectrum disorders in
tuberous sclerosis complex. Brain 125:1247–1255
Clarke DF, Roberts W, Daraksan M, Dupuis A, McCabe J, Wood H,
Snead OC III, Weiss SK (2005) The prevalence of autistic
spectrum disorder in children surveyed in a tertiary care epilepsy
clinic. Epilepsia 46:1970–1977
Crawley JN (2007) Mouse behavioral assays relevant to the
symptoms of autism. Brain Pathol 17:448–459
Curatolo P, Bombardieri R, Jozwiak S (2008) Tuberous sclerosis.
Lancet 372:657–668
de Vries PJ, Howe CJ (2007) The tuberous sclerosis complex
proteins—a GRIPP on cognition and neurodevelopment. Trends
Mol Med 13:319–326
de Vries PJ, Prather PA (2007) The tuberous sclerosis complex.
N Engl J Med 356:92
de Vries PJ, Hunt A, Bolton PF (2007) The psychopathologies of
children and adolescents with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC):
a postal survey of UK families. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry
16:16–24
Ehninger D, Han S, Shilyansky C, Zhou Y, Li W, Kwiatkowski DJ,
Ramesh V, Silva AJ (2008) Reversal of learning deficits in a
Tsc2?/- mouse model of tuberous sclerosis. Nat Med 14:
843–848
Eker R, Mossige J (1961) A dominant gene for renal adenomas in the
rat. Nature 189:858–859
File SE (2000) NKP608, an NK1 receptor antagonist, has an
anxiolytic action in the social interaction test in rats. Psycho-
pharmacology (Berl) 152:105–109
File SE, Hyde JR (1978) Can social interaction be used to measure
anxiety? Br J Pharmacol 62:19–24
File SE, Cheeta S, Akanezi C (2001) Diazepam and nicotine increase
social interaction in gerbils: a test for anxiolytic action. Brain
Res 888:311–313
Fisch GS (2007) Animal models and human neuropsychiatric
disorders. Behav Genet 37:1–10
Gomez MR, Sampson JR, Whittemore VH (1999) The tuberous
sclerosis complex. Oxford University Press, New York
Goorden SM, van Woerden GM, van der Weerd L, Cheadle JP,
Elgersma Y (2007) Cognitive deficits in Tsc1?/- mice in the
absence of cerebral lesions and seizures. Ann Neurol 62:
648–655
Irvine EE, Cheeta S, Marshall M, File SE (2001) Different treatment
regimens and the development of tolerance to nicotine’s
anxiogenic effects. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 68:769–776
Joinson C, O’Callaghan FJ, Osborne JP, Martyn C, Harris T, Bolton
PF (2003) Learning disability and epilepsy in an epidemiological
sample of individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex. Psychol
Med 33:335–344
Jozwiak S, Goodman M, Lamm SH (1998) Poor mental development
in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex: clinical risk factors.
Arch Neurol 55:379–384
Moldin SO, Rubenstein JLR (2006) Understanding autism: from basic
neuroscience to treatment. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Moy SS, Nadler JJ, Young NB, Perez A, Holloway LP, Barbaro RP,
Barbaro JR, Wilson LM, Threadgill DW, Lauder JM, Magnuson
TR, Crawley JN (2007) Mouse behavioral tasks relevant to
autism: phenotypes of 10 inbred strains. Behav Brain Res
176:4–20
O’Callaghan FJ, Harris T, Joinson C, Bolton P, Noakes M, Presdee D,
Renowden S, Shiell A, Martyn CN, Osborne JP (2004) The
relation of infantile spasms, tubers, and intelligence in tuberous
sclerosis complex. Arch Dis Child 89:530–533
Rennebeck G, Kleymenova EV, Anderson R, Yeung RS, Artzt K,
Walker CL (1998) Loss of function of the tuberous sclerosis 2
tumor suppressor gene results in embryonic lethality character-
ized by disrupted neuroepithelial growth and development. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 95:15629–15634
Sayin U, Sutula TP, Stafstrom CE (2004) Seizures in the developing
brain cause adverse long-term effects on spatial learning and
anxiety. Epilepsia 45:1539–1548
Schneider M, Schomig E, Leweke FM (2008) Acute and chronic
cannabinoid treatment differentially affects recognition memory
and social behavior in pubertal and adult rats. Addict Biol 13:
345–357
Smalley SL (1998) Autism and tuberous sclerosis. J Autism Dev
Disord 28:407–414
Spence SJ, Schneider MT (2009) The role of epilepsy and epilep-
tiform EEGs in autism spectrum disorders. Pediatr Res
65:599–606
Tordjman S, Drapier D, Bonnot O, Graignic R, Fortes S, Cohen D,
Millet B, Laurent C, Roubertoux PL (2007) Animal models
relevant to schizophrenia and autism: validity and limitations.
Behav Genet 37:61–78
Turk J, Bax M, Williams C, Amin P, Eriksson M, Gillberg C (2009)
Autism spectrum disorder in children with and without epilepsy:
impact on social functioning and communication. Acta Paediatr
98:675–681
Viding E, Blakemore SJ (2007) Endophenotype approach to devel-
opmental psychopathology: implications for autism research.
Behav Genet 37:51–60
Waltereit R, Welzl H, Dichgans J, Lipp HP, Schmidt WJ, Weller M
(2006) Enhanced episodic-like memory and kindling epilepsy in
a rat model of tuberous sclerosis. J Neurochem 96:407–413
Waltereit R, Mannhardt S, Nescholta S, Maser-Gluth C, Bartsch D
(2008) Selective and protracted effect of nifedipine on fear
memory extinction correlates with induced stress response.
Learn Mem 15:348–356
372 Behav Genet (2011) 41:364–372
123