epidemiology. definition biology “basal-like” the “triple negative” breast cancer estrogen...
TRANSCRIPT
Epidemiology
DefinitionBiology
“Basal-Like”
The “Triple Negative” Breast Cancer
Estrogen Receptor (ER) negativeProgesterone receptor (PR) negative
Her2neu (HER2) negative
ER/PR/HER2 -ER/PR/HER2 -
Clinical features
“Triple-Negative” Breast Cancer: Clinical Features and Patterns of
Recurrence• HBBC database (1987-1997)
• 1601 (80%) of patients had details on hormone receptors/HER2 and were eligible for the study
• 180 (12%) of the 1601 patients were defined as “triple negative” breast cancers
• Mean follow up was 8.1 years
Dent, R. et al. Clin Cancer Res 2007
Characteristics of “Triple Negative” vs. Other Breast Cancers
CharacteristicOther
(N=1421)number (percent)
“Triple Negative”(N=180)
number (percent)
Significancep value *
Mean Age at Diagnosis (yrs) 57.7 53 p < 0.0001
Mean Tumor Size 2.1 cm 3.0 cm p < 0.0001
Tumor Size
T1 (≤ 2 cm) 880 (62.7) 65 (36.5) p < 0.0001
T2 (>2cm to ≤ 5cm) 461 (32.8) 99 (55.6)
T3 (>5cm) 64 (4.6) 14 (7.9)
Missing 16 2
Lymph Node Status
Positive 510 (45.6) 87 (54.4) p = 0.02
Negative 609 (54.4) 70 (44.6)
Missing or Not Tested 302 23
Tumor Grade
I 237 (19.9) 15 (9.8) p < 0.0001
II 616 (51.8) 37 (24.2)
III 336 (28.3) 101 (66.0)
Missing
* p values were calculated with the use of the chi-square test
Dent, R. et al. Clin Cancer Res 2007
Tumor Size by Nodal Status according to “Basal-Like” Group
Non “Basal-like” Group(N=1421)
“Basal-like” Group(N=180)
Tumour Size Lymph Node PositiveNumber (percent)
Lymph Node PositiveNumber (percent)
<1.0 cm 38 (19.3) 5 (55.6)
1 - 2 cm 180 (39.3) 25 (55.6)
2.1- 5 cm 238 (59.5) 43 (48.9)
>5.1 cm 53 (91.4) 12 (92.3)
p<0.0001 p=0.042
* p values were calculated with the use of the chi-square test
Dent, R. et al. Clin Cancer Res 2007
Distant Recurrence
Dent, R. et al. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:4429-4434
Prob
abili
ty o
f bei
ng re
curr
ence
-fre
e
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Years after diagnosis
p<0.0001 (log-Rank test)
Other (290 of 1421) “Triple-negative” (61 of 180)
Overall Survival
Dent, R. et al. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:4429-4434
Prob
abili
ty o
f sur
viva
l
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Years after diagnosis
p<0.0001 (log-Rank test)
Other (261 of 1420) “Triple-negative” (62 of 180)
Non-random distribution X² statistic 42.78p 0.0003
Subtype
Smid et al, Cancer Res, in press
Patterns of Metastatic Spread• More likely to spread to brain, lung and possibly liver
and less likely to spread to bone and soft tissues– Tsuda et al. 2000 Am J of Surgical Pathology– Rodriguez-Pinilla et al. Clinical Cancer Research 2006– Fulford et al. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2007– Hicks et al. 2006 Am J of Surgical Pathology
• More likely to present with visceral metastases versus bone metastases as first site of metastases
– 70% vs 37%, p < 0.001 (Dent et al. SABCS 2007)
Median Time from Distant Relapse to Death
0 5 10 15 20 25
22 months
9 months
Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard K, Hana W, Narod S. et al. Clinical Cancer Res 2007
“Triple Negative” Breast CA
Other Breast CA
Treatment
Days
0 20 40 60 80 100
Tum
or
Volu
me
(m
m3 )
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Control5mg Doxorubicin1.25mg Doxorubicin3mg Cisplatin1.25mg Cisplatin6mg Cisplatin (non-average)
Response of Brca1/p53 Mammary Tumors to Doxorubicin or Cisplatin/Carboplatin in vivo
Characteristics of retrieved studies Characteristics of retrieved studies - I- I
Study ComparisonHER2 status
determined (%)
NSABP B11 Paik S et al, JNCI 1998
PF vs PAF 638/682 (94%)
NSABP B15Paik S et al, JNCI 2000
CMF vs AC 2.034/2.295 (89%)
GUN 3 De Laurentiis M et al, ASCO 2001
CMF vs CMF/EV 123/220 (56%)
BelgianDi Leo A et al, Clin Cancer Res 2002
CMF vs HEC/EC 354/777 (46%)
Milan Moliterni A et al, J Clin Oncol 2003
CMF vs CMF→ A 506/552 (92%)
DanishKnoop AS et al, J Clin Oncol 2005
CMF vs FEC 805/980 (82%)
NCIC MA5 Pritchard KI et al, NEJM 2006
CMF vs CEF 628/710 (88%)
Gennari et al, JNCI 2008
Total (determined/randomised)Total (determined/randomised) 5.088/6.216 (82%)5.088/6.216 (82%)
Characteristics of studies - IICharacteristics of studies - II
Study MethodHER2
positive/screened
%
NSABP B11 IHC 239/638 37%
NSABP B15 IHC 599/2.034 29%
GUN 3 IHC 30/123 24%
Belgian FISH 73/354 21%
Milan IHC 95/506 19%
Danish IHC/FISH 246/805 33%
NCIC MA5 IHC/FISH/PCR 163/628 (FISH) 26%
Total (positive/screened)Total (positive/screened) 1.445/5.0881.445/5.088 28%28%
Gennari et al, JNCI 2008
Adjuvant Anthracyclines and HER2:Adjuvant Anthracyclines and HER2:Disease Free SurvivalDisease Free Survival
Anthra betterStudy HER2 status HR (95% CI)
+ 0.60 (0.44 to 0.82)- 0.96 (0.75 to 1.23)
+ 0.84 (0.65 to 1.08)- 1.02 (0.86 to 1.20)
+ 0.65 (0.34 to 1.26)- 1.35 (0.93 to 1.97)
+ 0.83 (0.46 to 1.49)- 1.22 (0.91 to 1.64)
+ 0.75 (0.53 to 1.06)- 0.79 (0.60 to 1.05)
+ 0.52 (0.34 to 0.80)- 0.91 (0.71 to 1.17)
Overall 0.90 (0.82 to 0.98)+ 0.71 (0.61 to 0.83)- 1.00 (0.90 to 1.11)
NSABP B11
NSABP B15
Belgian
Milan
DBCG 89D
NCIC MA5
HER2 specific
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00
Test for interaction: 2 13.7, p< .001
Non anthra better
Gennari A. et al. JNCI 2008Gennari A. et al. JNCI 2008
Adjuvant Anthracyclines and HER2 :Adjuvant Anthracyclines and HER2 :Overall SurvivalOverall Survival
Study HER2 status HR (95% CI)
+ 0.66(0.42 to 1.01)- 0.90(0.69 to 1.18)+ 0.82(0.63 to 1.06)- 1.07(0.88 to 1.30)+ 0.85(0.27 to 2.69)- 1.64(0.85 to 3.15)+ 0.61(0.32 to1.16)- 1.26(0.89 to 1.79)+ 0.73(0.50 to 1.05)- 0.82(0.59 to 1.13)
+ 0.65(0.42 to 1.01)- 1.06(0.80 to1.40)+ 0.71(0.32 to 1.55)- 1.25(0.58 to 2.67)
Overall 0.91(0.79 to 1.04)+ 0.73(0.62 to 0.85)- 1.03(0.92 to 1.16)
NSABP B11
NSABP B15
GUN
Milan
DBCG 89D
NCIC MA5
HER2 specific
GOIRC
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.003.50
Test for interaction: 2 12.6, p< .001
Anthra betterNon anthra better
Gennari A. et al. JNCI 2008Gennari A. et al. JNCI 2008
Efficacy summaryEfficacy summary
•Risk of relapse
29%
HR 0.71 (0.61-0.83)
•Risk of death
27%
HR 0.73 (0.62-0.85)
HER2 positiveHER2 positive
Risk of relapse anthra ≈ non anthra HR 1.00 (0.90-1.11)
Risk of death anthra ≈ non anthra
HR 1.03 (0.92-1.16)
HER2 negativeHER2 negative
p <0.001p <0.001
p <0.001p <0.001
Gennari et al, JNCI 2008
Highly hormon-sensitive
Moderately hormon-sensitive
HER-2 amplified
Triple negative
Pathological Complete Response to Chemotherapy Differs by Subtipes
AC → TCarey CCR 07
T → FACRouzier CCR 05
Luminal A/B 4/62 (7%) 2/30 (7%)
Normal-like NA 0/10 (0)
HER2+ and ER- 4/11 (36%) 9/20 (45%)
Triple negative 9/34 (27%) 10/22 (45%)
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple Negative Patients. MD Anderson Experience
• The largest date set available (1118 pts) 23% TNBC, pCR 15%
Regimens pts TNBC non-TNBC
FAC/FEC/AC 308 20% 5%
TFAC/TFEC 588 28% 17%
Taxanes 58 12% 2%
Other 164 14% 7%
Total 1118 22% 11%p 0.034
Liedtke, M. et al. J Clin Oncol; aheadof print on Febr 4, 2008
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in TNBCSurvival by Pathological Response
Liedtke, M. et al. J Clin Oncol; aheadof print on Febr 4, 2008
Ixabepilone+Capecitabine a Phase III TrialIxabepilone+Capecitabine a Phase III Trial
MetastaticMetastaticbreast cancerbreast cancer
N = 752N = 752
IxabepiloneIxabepilone++
CapecitabineCapecitabine
N = 375N = 375
CapecitabineCapecitabine
N = 377N = 377
Previous AnthraPrevious Anthra
Taxane ResistantTaxane Resistant
Vahdat LTVahdat LT et al: et al: ASCO2007ASCO2007
1.01.0
0.00.0
Prop
ortio
n Pr
ogre
ssio
n Fr
eePr
opor
tion
Prog
ress
ion
Free
MonthsMonths
0.60.6
0.80.8
0.40.4
0.20.2
00
MedianMedian
5.8 mo5.8 mo
4.2 mo4.2 mo
95 % Cl95 % Cl
(5.5 - 7.0)(5.5 - 7.0)
(3.8 - 4.5)(3.8 - 4.5)
HR: 0.75 (0.64-0.88)HR: 0.75 (0.64-0.88)p = 0.0003p = 0.0003
44 88 1212 1616 2020 2424 2828 3232 3636
IxabepiloneIxabepilone++ Capecitabine Capecitabine
CapecitabineCapecitabine
Vahdat LTVahdat LT et al: et al: ASCO2007ASCO2007
Ixabepilone+Capecitabine a Phase III TrialIxabepilone+Capecitabine a Phase III Trial
Ixabepilone+Capecitabine a Phase III TrialIxabepilone+Capecitabine a Phase III Trial
RugoRugo et al: et al: SABCS 2007SABCS 2007
Perspectives
Basal-like Breast Cancer and BRCA1
= BRCA1+
Sorlie T et al. PNAS 03