environmental surveillance - mm3 admin : login€¦ · environmental surveillance fidssa 2015 ......
TRANSCRIPT
The Scientist
• A scientist, in a broad sense, is a person engaging in a systematic activity to acquire knowledge
• We require evidence
• WE NEED AN ANSWER
Age of Resistance
VRE, MRSA, CRE, ESBL, C difficile, C parapsilosis
• Antibiotic resistant pathogens continues to escalate
Hayden MK. Clin Infect Dis 2006;42:1552-60
HCAI
• HCAI is a major problem for patient safety and its surveillance and prevention must be a first priority
– prolonged hospital stay
– long-term disability
– increased resistance of microorganisms to antimicrobials
– massive additional financial burden
HCAI
• HCAI concerns
– 5–15% of hospitalized patients
– 9–37% of those admitted to intensive care units (ICUs)
– 25 million extra days of hospital stay
– Economic burden of €13–24 billion
Housing Challenge
20x15
R300 billion x1000
R300 000 million/150 000
2 000 000
2.68 million houses built by the state since 1994 according to the 20 Year Review. (134 000/year)
EUR Euro 15.1651409921 0.0659406992
http://www.sanews.gov.za/south-
africa/housing-delivery
The Patient zone
• The patient zone is defined as the patient’s intact skin and his/her immediate surroundings colonized by the patient flora and the healthcare area as containing all other surfaces
Environmental contamination
• Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii (MDR-AB) is an important nosocomial pathogen
– Prospective cohort study of ICU patients colonized or infected with MDR-AB
– For each patient, 10 surfaces in the patient room were sampled
AJIC Volume 39, Issue 9, November
2011, Pages 711–715
Environmental contamination
• Fifty rooms were sampled
• 48% (24/50) were positive at 1 or more sites
– Supply carts (10/50, 20%)
– Floors (8/50, 16%)
– Infusion pumps (7/50, 14%)
– Ventilator touch pads (5/44, 11.4%)
• Surrounding environment is frequently contaminated
AJIC Volume 39, Issue 9, November
2011, Pages 711–715
The Patient zone
• Patients occupying rooms previously occupied by patients with VRE MRSA, Clostridium difficile, and Acinetobacter baumannii infection or colonization have on average a 73% increased risk of acquiring the same pathogen
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:127-32 Epub
February 8, 2006
The Patient zone
• Only 40% of near patient surfaces are being cleaned in accordance with existing hospital policies
• Studies have shown thoroughness of disinfection cleaning can be improved to 82% (on average more than 100% over baseline)
Direct Practice Observation
• Covert monitoring of disinfection cleaning can provide an objective assessment of individual ES staff performance and compliance with cleaning protocols
• Cleaning improved from 48% to 87%
• Maintaining such a program
General Principles: Microbiologic Sampling of the Environment
• Before 1970, US hospitals conducted regularly scheduled culturing of the air and environmental surfaces (e.g., floors, walls, and table tops)
• During 1970–1975, 25% of US hospitals reduced the extent of such routine environmental culturing
High-touch surfaces
• The CDC (2003) recommended that hospitals clean and disinfect ‘‘high-touch surfaces”
• Hospitals ‘‘monitor (ie, supervise and inspect) cleaning performance
• Consistent cleaning and disinfection
• Touched by the patient and health care professionals
Swab Cultures
• Limited feasibility of monitoring multiple surfaces in multiple patient rooms as part of an ongoing monitoring program
Environmental Surface Sampling
Routine environmental-surface sampling (e.g., surveillance cultures) in health-care settings is neither cost-effective nor warranted
Environmental surface surveillance can not directly protect a patient from HCAI
1
Support an investigation of an outbreak of disease or infections when environmental
reservoirs or fomites are implicated epidemiologically in disease transmission
3
Monitor a potentially hazardous environmental condition
Presence of a hazardous chemical or biological agent
Validate the successful abatement
of the hazard
4
Quality assurance to evaluate the effects of a change in infection-control practice or to
ensure that equipment or systems perform according to specifications and expected
outcomes
Agar Slide Cultures
• Agar coated glass slides with finger holds were developed to simplify quantitative cultures of liquids
• Determine pre-cleaning levels of contamination for each object evaluated in order to accurately assess cleaning practice
Fluorescent Markers
• Surfaces that are effectively disinfected but less effectively cleaned may be more likely flagged as failing to meet a quality standard using one of these markers than one of the culture techniques
• Disinfection cleaning improving from 48% to 77%
ATP Bioluminescence
• A specialized swab is used to sample a standardized surface area
• Total amount of ATP, both microbial and non-microbial, is quantified and expressed as relative light units
Cleanliness versus cleaning practice
• Observation and fluorescent gel systems directly evaluate the cleaning process
• The swab or slide culture as well as ATP bioluminescence systems measure cleanliness
• Intrinsically low concentration of most major HAPs on surfaces limits the use of pathogen-specific monitoring
Creepy Crawlies
• Cockroaches
– Gram-negative bacteria • Acinetobacter spp.; Citrobacter freundii; Enterobacter spp., E. cloacae;
Escherichia coli; Flavobacterium spp.; Klebsiella spp.; Proteus spp.; Pseudomonas spp., P. aeruginosa, P. fluorescens, P. putida; Salmonella spp.; Serratia spp., S. marcescens; Shigella boydii
– Gram-positive bacteria • Bacillus spp.; Enterococcus faecalis; Micrococcus spp.; Staphylococcus
aureus, S. epidermidis; Streptococcus spp., S. viridans
– Fungi• Aspergillus niger; Mucor spp.; Rhizopus spp. Candida spp. (houseflies)
Conclusions
• Hand Hygiene
• Bacterial Persistence of MDR organisms
• Patient zone
• Monitoring / Evaluation
“Clutter and confusion are failures of design, not attributes of information.” — Edward Tuft
“Don’t make the process harder than it is.“ — Jack Welch