environmental plans for sustainable solutions
TRANSCRIPT
Environmental Planning
To Employ the Environment
For Our Benefit
PlanningTo Employ
Natural Hydrological
Occurrence to Generate
Electricity and Prevent Flooding
Environmental-Political Reality
• 6 Aging NPS in the Northeast with no replacement strategy and protracted shutdown costs due to neutron bombardment. Oyster Creek NPS. will close in 2021.
• New Jersey will be dependent on its neighbors for electrical energy.
• The Pinelands burns while the Hackensack, Passaic, and Raritan Drainage Areas Flood.
• The Shorelines remain vulnerable to Cyclonic and Barometric Weather Events.
Local Concerns
We cannot control the environment, we can, for a reasonable cost, mitigate its most severe effects:
• Massive, catastrophic thermal-barometric fires rage.• A failure to cooperatively balance water use
between agricultural, environmental, and public-private aquifers.
• Inept political-environmental management.• California radical environmental interests are
destroying the states’ second largest economic engine, its agricultural industry.
• Arizona, California, and Nevada squabble endlessly over water rights while wasting precious resources with faulty engineering practices.
• The central and southwest is drought stricken while the coastal states and northwest suffer catastrophic flooding from precipitation
• The Federal Government has limited Constitutional Authority
Environmental-Political RealityNational Concerns that Require
State Driven Cooperative Solutions
Weather is a statistical anomaly, the reoccurrence of stormor droughtIs not a matter of if, but of When . . .And where . . .
Point Pleasant Beach, October 29th, 2012
Long Branch, September 8th, 1889
This is a Historical ProblemIn the United States
That Remains Unaddressed
A South Dakota Family Farm, August, 1936
We have, lacking a consistentEmployment of known skills,Increased our loss of life, damages, And extremes of expense.
We are Not Taking mitigativeActions, just complaining
AndPaying Damages
Lower 9th Ward, N.O.L.A., August 2005
F.E.M.A. isDespite the Best Plans,
Only Reactive
Gilford Park, Ocean County, New Jersey; 29 October 2012
Renewable Electric Power
From Storm And Tidal Flood Mitigation
Ortley Beach, November 6th, 2012
• Just 25 to 33 percent of the personal and insurance loses are Beach Front, 66 to 75 percent of the damage totals are on the Flood Plains along the bay shores and rivers•Proposed Dunes only protect the beach and do not mitigate trapped Precipitation.
Zuider Zee Sea Gates,
Zuider Zee Tidal Gates,
St. Petersburg, RU. Sea Gates,
Rotterdam Harbor Sea Gates,
Pro-Active protection ofHuman Life and Property must
takePrecedence over all other
concernsHuge Opportunities for Electrical
Power Generation are a SecondaryConsideration, allowing cost reduction
Statistics Suggest thatSea Gates like these
At Rotterdam
Combined with Coastal Strengthening Works And DunesWould mitigate storm Effect and damagesBy 70 to 80 Percent
An Illustration of aStorm and TidalSurge ProtectionInstallation created by a Private-PublicConsortium to Protect New York Harbor and to Generate 2,000* Megawatts of Renewable Electrical Energy annually byEmploying the Tidal Flow*Low ended estimate, based in rumored Con-Edison East River Project results.
New York Approaches
Barnegat Inlet Sea Gate & Generator Footprint
Dunes
Barnegat Bay Approaches• Combined with
facilities at Manasquan and Egg River Inlet would replace Oyster Creek NPS.• Revenue Positive with no impact on employment.
Harlech Beach, Bristol Bay, Wales, U.K.
Ideal Engineered Dune Structure
Chevroned Dune Structure
Project to RelocateExcess Precipitation
To Drought EndangeredAreas
The U.S.A. is the BreadbasketOf the World and
Drought is destroying it!
These Charts from 2011 representNation Precipitation Levels
Actual precipitation, > 40 Inches are Surpluses
Shortages are shown above, less than 6 inches is critical in most areas
8%22%
70%
Worldwide Water UseDomesticIndustrialAgricultural
• This worldwide use depiction apportioned according to ISO Standard 3166-1 • Top three users, of water are, in order: China, India
and the United States• Top uses by percent:• Agricultural 70 percent (Low to moderate profit
made)• Industrial 22 percent (Median profits made)• Domestic 8 percent water use (Expense for
necessary use)• Billing must be based on a use ~ profit ratio• The highest bills will be accrued by industrial users and
then agricultural users with domestic use paying the least
Resource Stabilization Requirements• Rainwater Harvesting must become a National
initiative funded as a joint State, City, and Private Venture.
• Public, Private, and Commercial aquifer capping must require state permits.
• All storm-water runoff collectors must include petroleum and controlled substances collection and separation with aquifer repatriation.
• Non-estuarine Watersheds such as NJ’s Great Swamp must be monitored with excesses transferred to aquifers.
• A Nationwide, Inter and Intrastate Redistribution System of Large Mains, with above and below ground Cisterns.
• Geophysical Pumping Systems must be built to transfer errant natural deliveries to locations having needs.
• A Worldwide ban on nitrogen based fertilizers and other similar pollutants must be strictly enforced.
To Equalize Natural Inadequacies:
Roman Planned Distribution:From169 - 75 BCE to 247 – 476 ECE •Planned Distribution: 67 Liters (17.6 U.S. Gal. ea.) (86.7 Mil. USG.) per individual per day •Distribution required no energy or power expense Pont du Gard, Le Cote du Rhone Provence,
France
Roman Aqueducts
Were Everywhere
While the majority of theAqueducts we can see todayAre open topped ruins, most
Were actually 1 to 3Meters below ground
To reduce evaporation
Aqua Traiana (Aqueduct)– Dated June 109 ECE, Traiana was designed to supply grain mills. During the 17th Century, it was reconstructed by the Vatican. It still delivers water to the gardens of Rome today.
Roman Aqueduct, Tarragona Spain
In most cases the engineeredPitch of the fluid path did not
Exceed 1:4,800 (Pes) [Roman Feet]
Inverted Siphons: were used for engineering convenience, To raise or lower the height of the flows feed
or to control the water pressure. Roman Engineers employed these in many instances, in spite of poor plumbing lacking sufficient quality to restrain the
pressure. That is not significant today. The generation station is inserted where the Romans might have installed
a granary.
Electrical Power Generator
Association of States Environmental And Water Administration Corporation
(a non-profit GSE)
Board of Governors and Business Management
NortheastRegion
9 State Systems,
SoutheastRegion
10 State Systems, Puerto Rico & US. VI.,
North Central Region
7 State Systems,
South CentralRegion
7 State Systems,
NorthwestRegion
9 State Systems &
Alaska
Southwest Region
12 State Systems & Hawaii, Guam, and
Amer. Samoa
Specialization Guidance ACoE – Engineering, DEP – Water
Quality, NOAA – Environmental Prediction &
Equalization,
Control of Storm & Tidal Surge Protection, and Precipitation Redistribution and Power Generation
Systems
Organizational Headquarters: Kansas City, Mo.1. Region One, Northeast: Me, VT, NH, MA, NY, RI, CT, PA, NJ; 9 Org.2. Region Two, Southeast: DE, MD, WVA, VA, NC, SC, GA, AL, FL, USVI,
10 Org.3. Region Three, North Central: MN, WI, MI, OH, IA, IL, IN; 7 Org.4. Region Four, South Central: MO, KY, TN, AR, LA, MS, PR; 7 Org.5. Region Five, North West: WA, ID, MT, ND, OR, WY, SD, NE, AK; 9 Org.6. Region Six, South West: CA, NV, UT, CO, KS, AZ, NM, TX, OK, HI, Gu,
As; 12 Org.
+
Projected Fiscal ArrangementsFINANCIAL GUARANTEE REQUIREMENTS:
• 2.5 TRILLION FEDERAL DOLLAR LOAN GUARANTEE (62,500,000,000 PER YEAR OVER 30 YEARS).• FOR LOANS TAKEN BY STATE ASSOCIATIONS
AND THEIR WATER AND POWER UTILITY COMPANIES (1,116,071,429 STATES’ ANNUAL LIMIT).
• LOANS MADE BY BANKS, AND INSURANCE COMPANIES.
• COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATIONS & CORPORATE USERS REPAYMENT OF LOANS AND EXPENSES BEGINNING IN 10TH YEAR FROM USE FEES, DEBT PAID OUT IN YEAR 30 PAYING FEES AND TAXES IN YEAR 40. ASSOCIATION AND STATE PAYMENTS WILL DEPEND ON THE NUMBER OF STATES AND PROJECTS INVOLVED.
Tidal Electrical Generation ProjectEstimated Manpower Requirements, Dependent on Decided Scope of Project(s)
Months 1-6
Months 6-12 Year 2 Year 3-
5Year 6-
10Year
11-20Year
20-30Year
30-40Full Time
Permanent Renewable Power Generation from Storm and Tidal Abatement Projects
Business Management By State
Total of States
Business/Financial 15 30 60 60 60 60 60 60 50Logistical 0 15 120 120 120 120 120 120 100
Management Employment
Project Managers 30 100 500 500 500 500 500 500 50Planners 120 240 400 240 200 200 200 200 100Planners
Assistants 60 120 240 120 120 120 120 120 100Engineers 60 180 420 420 360 360 180 120 100Specialty Engineers 30 60 120 120 120 60 60 60 50
Engineering Assistants 60
Draftsmen/CAD 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120Foremen 10 10 40 100 200 200 200 100 100Assistant Foremen 10 10 40 200 400 400 400 200 200
Skilled LaborTransport 25 100 1000 2000 2500 3000 2500 2000 500Logistical 10 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 500Concrete Specialty 0 Dependent on Project Demand 1000Concrete 0 Dependent on Project Demand 1000
Steel & Iron Workers 0 Dependent on Project Demand 1000
Underground Specialty 0 Dependent on Project Demand 1000
Unskilled Labor Dependent on Project Demand 1000Above Grade 0 Dependent on Project Demand 1000Below Grade 0 Dependent on Project Demand 1000
Drought Mitigation ProjectEstimated Manpower Requirements, Dependent on Decided Scope of Project(s)
Months 1-6
Months 6-12 Year 2 Year 3-
5Year 6-
10Year
11-20Year
20-30Year
30-40Full Time
Permanent Excess Precipitation Adjustment
Business Mgt. By State
Total of States
Business/Financial 15 30 60 60 60 60 60 60 50Logistical 0 15 120 120 120 120 120 120 100
Management Employment
Project Managers 30 100 500 500 500 500 500 500 50Planners 120 240 400 240 200 200 200 200 100Planners
Assistants 60 120 240 120 120 120 120 120 100Engineers 60 180 420 420 360 360 180 120 100Specialty Engineers 30 60 120 120 120 60 60 60 50
Engineering Assistants 60Foremen 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120Assistant Foremen 10 10 40 100 200 200 200 100 100
Skilled Labor 10 10 40 200 400 400 400 200 200TransportLogistical 25 100 1000 2000 2500 3000 2500 2000 500Concrete Specialty 10 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 500Concrete 0 Dependent on Project Demand 1000
Steel & Iron Workers 0 Dependent on Project Demand 1000
Underground Specialty 0 Dependent on Project Demand 1000
Unskilled Labor 0 Dependent on Project Demand 1000
Above Grade Dependent on Project Demand 1000Below Grade 0 Dependent on Project Demand 1000
0 Dependent on Project Demand 1000
Anticipated ProjectionsOf Permanent Employment
Estimated Manpower Requirements, Dependent on Decided Scope of Project(s))
Months 1-6
Months 6-12
Year 1-2
Year 3-5
Year 6-10
Year 11-20
Year 20-30
Year 30-40
Full Time Permanent
(Total/ Year)
Total of States
Total Labor Force 1,650 5,955 12,180 15,000 17,100 18,420 16,380 13,800 2,512
NJ LaborForce 28 104 213 263 300 320 287 242 35
Estimates of actual required labor force is intentionally low ended. There will be situational adjustments as required by the ongoing plan. Financial arrangements must be flexible through forty year building period, beyond that time state and regional support budgets are anticipated to be self-supporting based on Energy and Product consumption receipts.