environmental monitoring report · sppl surat pernyataan pengelolaan lingkungan (environmental...

Environmental Monitoring Report

Semi-Annual Report

November 2018

INO: Community-Focused Investments to Address Deforestation and Forest DegradationReporting period: January to June 2018

Prepared by the Directorate General of Social Forestry and Environmental Partnership, Ministry of Environment and Forestry for the Asian Development Bank

This Semi-annual Environmental Monitoring Report is a document of the Recipient. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB Board of Directors, Management or staff, and my be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as the legal or other status of any territory or area.

FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAM 1: COMMUNITY-FOCUSED INVESTMENTS TO ADDRESS

DEFORESTATION AND FOREST DEGRADATION

SEMI-ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARD MONITORING REPORT

(JANUARY-JUNE 2018)

Prepared for:

ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 6 ADB AVENUE

MANDALUYONG CITY 1550 METRO MANILA

PHILIPPINES

Prepared by:

DIRECTORATE OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT FOR SOCIAL FORESTRY AND CUSTOMARY FOREST

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF SOCIAL FORESTRY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PARTNERSHIP

MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTRY REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

GEDUNG MANGGALA WANABAKTI, BLOCK IV, 8TH FLOOR JAKARTA, INDONESIA

NOVEMBER 2018

SA Environmental Safehuards i FIP-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................... I

LIST OF TABLES.................................................................................................... II

LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................. II

LIST OF APPENDICES .......................................................................................... II

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 11.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 1

1.2 OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF THE MONITORING REPORT ............................... 1

2.0 KEY-PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS .......................................... 22.1 PROJECT PROFILE ................................................................................................ 2

2.2 PROGRESS OF KEY-PROJECTS ACHIEVED DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD .............................................................................................. 6

3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS ........................................... 73.1 SCREENING AND CATEGORIZATION PROCESS ............................................... 7

3.2 ADB ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARD POLICY ................................................... 8

3.3 APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS IN INDONESIA .............................................................................................................. 8

3.4 IMPLEMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES .............. 9

3.5 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND RESPONSIBILLITY ............................ 10

4.0 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ...................................................... 12

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING STATUS .............................................. 12

6.0 CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ............................. 12

7.0 CAPACITY BUILDING UNDERTAKEN ...................................................... 13

8.0 FINDINGS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION ................................................... 13

9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................... 15

10.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................ 16

SA Environmental Safehuards ii FIP-1

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Overall Output Details and Activity Description ............................................................................... 2

Table 2. Progress of Sub-Projects during the Reporting Period.................................................................... 6

Table 3. Comparison between ADB and the Government’s Project Categories ........................................... 7

Table 4. Status of Project Screening and Categorization in S1/2018 ............................................................ 7

Table 5. Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures in Semester 1/2018 ................................................. 9

Table 6. Institutional Responsibilities for Environmental Monitoring ........................................................... 10

Table 7. Consultation and Project Disclosure ............................................................................................. 13

Table 8. Findings and Corrective Action During Reporting Period of S1/2018 ............................................ 13

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. FIP-1 Villages in Kapuas Hulu District ........................................................................................... 4

Figure 2. FIP-1 Villages in Sintang District .................................................................................................... 5

Figure 3. Project Organization for Environmental Monitoring ...................................................................... 12

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix 1 Proposed Location of Agroforestry and Rubber Plantation in Radin Jaya Village

Appendix 2 Official Minutes of Public Consultation

Appendix 3 Public Consultation

Appendix 4 GRM Scheme and Complaint Form (GRM)

Appendix 5 Environmental Impact Assessment

Appendix 6 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA)

Appendix 7 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist for Microhydro Power Plant in Kayu Dujung Village

Appendix 8 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist for Solar Panel in Kayu Dujung Village

SA Environmental Safehuards iii FIP-1

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank

AMDAL Analisa Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan (Environmental Impact Assessment - full

process)

ANDAL Analisa Dampak Lingkungan (Environmental Impact Analysis - the study)

AP Affected Person

AWP Annual Work Plan

BBTNBKDS Balai Besar Taman Nasional Betung Kerihun dan Danau Sentarum (Betung

Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park Agency)

BLH Badan Lingkungan Hidup (Local Environmental Office)

BPHP Balai Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi (Production Forest Management Agency)

BPSKL Balai Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan (Social Forestry and

Environmental Partnerhsips)

BUPSHA Bina Usaha Perhutanan Sosial dan Hutan Adat (Business Development of Social

Forestry and Customary)

CBFM Community based forest management

DG Directorate General

EA Executing Agency

EARF Environmental Assessment Review Framework

EIA Environmental impact assessment

FIP Forest Investment Program

FMU Forest Management Unit

FPIC Free Prior and Informed Consent

GHG Greenhouse Gas

GIZ Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit

GOI Government of Indonesia

GPP Grievance Point Person

GRC Grievances Redress Committee

GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism

IA Implementation Agency

IEE Initial Environmental Examination

IFC International Finance Corporation

JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency

KPH Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (Forest Management Unit)

KPHP Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi (Unit of Production Forest Management)

SA Environmental Safehuards iv FIP-1

KSDAE Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam dan Ekosistem (Conservation of Natural

Resources and Ecosystem)

MHA Masyararakat Hutan Adat (Customary Forest Community)

MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forestry

PAM Project Administration Manual

PCU Program Coordination Unit

PHPL Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi Lestari (Management of Sustainable Production

Forests)

PJLHK Pemanfaatan Jasa Lingkungan Hutan Konservasi (Utilization of Conservation

Forest Environmental Services

PSC Project Steering Committee

PSKL Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan (Social Forestry and

Environmental Partnerships)

PISU Project Implementation Supporting Unit

REA Rapid Environmental Assessment

REDD+ Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, conservation,

sustainable forest management and forest carbon (“+” refers to the last three phrases)

RKL Rencana Pengelolaan Lingkungan (Environment Management Plan - companion

To ANDAL)

RPHJP Rencana Pengelolaan Hutan Jangka Panjang (Long-term Forest Management

Plan)

RPL Rencana Pemantauan Lingkungan (Environmental Monitoring Plan - companion

To ANDAL)

SAEMR Semi-Annual Environmental Monitoring Report

SC Steering Committee

SFM Sustainable Forest Management

SNI Indonesia National Standard

SPPL Surat Pernyataan Pengelolaan Lingkungan (Environmental Management

Statement)

SPS Safeguard Policy Statement

TOR Terms of Reference

UKL Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan (Environmental Management Effort)

UPL Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Monitoring Effort)

UPT Unit Pelaksana Teknis (Technical Implementation Unit)

WB World Bank

WWF World Wide Fund for Nature

SA Environmental Safehuards 1 FIP-1

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND

1. The FIP-1 project is part of Indonesia's forestry investment plan that will complement the FIP project managed by the Asian Development Bank (ADB), World Bank (WB) and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) in addressing the causes of deforestation and forest degradation. The project consists of several sub-projects both land-based activities and non-land based activities that invest in community-based REDD+ activities (e.g. community-based land use planning, community-based forest monitoring and fire-caring communities, community-based forest regeneration, and community-based ecotourism) in four forest management units (KPH) in two districts (Kapuas Hulu and Sintang) in the province of West Kalimantan.

2. West Kalimantan, which is a key province in the Heart of Borneo Initiative, has a large forests area and is the fifth largest provincial contributor to Indonesia’s carbon emissions. The four key drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in the province are: (i) commercial logging; (ii) forest conversion to agriculture (primarily to palm oil); (iii) mining (primarily coal and gold); and (iv) uncontrolled fires. ADB’s contribution, as well as the contribution of other institutions (e.g., GIZ and JICA) will support the government to implement the provincial REDD+ strategy, thus helping West Kalimantan to achieve the 2020 GHG reduction target of 266.11 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e) from the forestry and peat sectors.

3. In addition to reducing GHG emissions, which are the main objectives of the FIP-1 program, there are also policies to increase carbon stocks through land rehabilitation programs, provide benefits to the livelihoods of communities around the forest through agroforestry activities, strengthen land management rights for Indigenous Peoples (MHA) on their customary lands, improve conservation and biodiversity, facilitate institutional strengthening, and provide environmental services. Institutional strengthening is more about strengthening the capacity of FMUs/KPHs, districts and province government, and providing support to harmonize policies at the regional and central levels in terms of increasing carbon stocks by building non-monetary incentives and implementing monitoring, environmental safeguards, and fair benefit sharing arrangements and gender responsiveness.

4. The process of implementing community-based forest emission reduction and forest investment policies is carried out through a series of land-based and non-land based sub-projects in 17 villages (both Kapuas Hulu and Sintang Districts). These activities require an environmental and social safeguard that is in line with and in accordance with national regulations and ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) as a donor (Compliance). The environmental mitigation and monitoring process is very important to minimize the potential impacts that are expected to occur during the project implementation phase.

1.2 OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF THE MONITORING REPORT

5. The main objective of this Semi-Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (SAEMR) is to briefly present the progress of the FIP-1 program from January until June 2018. Further, this report will explain the range of potential impacts that will arise during the achievement of each sub-project and mitigation actions that can be taken to minimize these potential impacts.


2.0 KEY-PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS 2.1 PROJECT PROFILE

6. The objective of the FIP-1 program is to improve the capacity and livelihoods of communities around forest areas in 17 villages of the Kapuas Hulu and Sintang Districts. It is expected to provide benefits to the community, in terms of both environmental and livelihood improvements. The results of the FIP-1 project are achieved in several outputs, namely:

▪ Output-1, REDD+ demonstrations that focus on the community and gender responsiveness in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang districts are implemented.

▪ Output-2, Implementation of REDD+ strategies in West Kalimantan Province.

▪ Output-3, Harmonization of Fiscal Policy on REDD+ between subnational and national levels.

7. Based on the Annual Work Plan (AWP) for 2018, which was developed by the Executing Agency i.e. Directorate General of Social Forestry and Environmental Partnerships (Direktur Jenderal Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan) in February 2018, some of the proposed sub-project activities that will be conducted in 2018 – 2021 are provided in Table 1.

Table 1. Overall Output Details and Activity Description

Output Activity on

PAM Description

Year of Implementation

Community focused and gender responsive REDD+ pilots in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang Districts implemented

Agroforestry

The project will develop an Agroforestry system involving coffee, agarwood and rubber in 40 ha from 1.880 ha total of degraded land. The activity will be carried out due to the uncontrolled exploitation of the community. To reduce pressure on natural forests, the project will support the pilot to grow agarwood in an Agroforestry system with coffee.

2018

Rubber Plantation (Land Rehabilitation)

Natural restoration of forests will be conducted for 20 ha from total 6000 ha. The activity will include the identification of a suitable area that matches with the FMU plan, identification of native species for planting, construction of nurseries in three FMU (Sungai Merakai, Kapuas Hulu, and Blok XXI), and planting of around 1.5 million native plants. Nursery design will follow best local practices.

2018

Solar Panel FIP-1 through BPSKL as IA will provide 250 unit solar panels for Radin Jaya Village, (Sintang District).

2018

Micro Hydro Power Plant

Two schemes of community-managed micro-hydro power plants will be installed, with a capacity to produce 40 KVA along with an air power network, to cover around 200 households in Kayu Dujung Village (Sintang District) and Tanjung Lokang (Kapuas Hulu District).

Postponed to 2019

Drinking Water Facilities

This project will construct 2 units of clean water facilities in all targeted villages to overcome the scarcity of clean water. Water is currently obtained

2018


Output Activity on

PAM Description

Year of Implementation

from rivers with poor water quality around residences, as well as rainwater. Access to clean water sources is 6-7 km on average, along difficult terrain.

Road Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation of village roads along 2 km will be carried out through this project. Community access to the main road will be easier to increase the opportunity to market agricultural products, and reduce transportation time and costs.

Postponed to 2019

Source: AWP 2018.

8. The Outputs 2 and 3 will not be included in this environmental monitoring report, as the details of the plan, activity and timeline for implementation have not yet been determined by IA / UPT.

9. The locations of the FIP-1 Program, which cover 17 villages, are provided in Figure 1 and Figure 2.


Figure 1. FIP-1 Villages in Kapuas Hulu District


Figure 2. FIP-1 Villages in Sintang District


2.2 PROGRESS OF KEY-PROJECTS ACHIEVED DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD

10. FIP-1 implementation started with public consultation activities in Sintang District (five villages). The activity was conducted together with FMU-Sintang Utara as the responsible agency for the forest area in Sintang district between 18 - 28 May 2018. The detail of the progress and activities conducted from January to June 2018 is explained as follows:

Table 2. Progress of Sub-Projects during the Reporting Period

Planned Activities in 2018

Proposed Location Description Progress until June 2018

Agroforestry and

Rubber Plantation

Radin Jaya Village, (Mengerat, Nalan Radin, and Sebara Sub –Village)

The location regarding agroforestry and rubber plantation in Radin Jaya Village in Appendix A1

BPSKL as IA will conducted 40 ha of agroforestry with tree species of petai, engkol and gaharu, as well as some vegetables, paddy and 20 ha of rubber by using Community Participation method.

• Public Consultation regarding FIP-1 Program and all sub-projects have been held in Senangan Kecil, Senangan Jaya, Tanjung Sari, Radin Jaya, and Kayu Dujung Villages conducted on 18 – 28 May 2018 (Official Minutes of Public Consultation regarding FIP-1 program in Appendix A2).

• The procurement of the solar panel was delayed.

• The provision of the micro-hydro power plant was delayed.

• The provision of the clean water supply was delayed.

• The rehabilitation of village road was delayed.

Solar Panels Radin Jaya Village (Sungai Sepan Sub Village)

BPSKL as IA will procure 250 units of solar panel.

Micro Hydro Power Plant

Kayu Dujung Village - Sungai Puang Sub-Village.

1 Unit (40 KVA) will provided by BPSKL

Clean water supply facility

In all FIP-1 Villages targeted

10 Unit of drinking facilities in Sintang District will provided by BPSKL

Road Rehabilitation In all FIP-1 Villages targeted (BPHP/KPHP as IA on first semester of 2019 will decide for specific village)

A total of 10 Km of Village Road in Radin Jaya, Senangan Kecil, Senangan Besar villages.


3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS 3.1 SCREENING AND CATEGORIZATION PROCESS

11. In FIP-1 program, the environmental screening and categorization process was carried out by following Government of Indonesia regulations and ADB’s Safeguard Policies (SPS 2009) requirement. All subproject activities should screen out in order to find the influence magnitude by defining the most environmentally sensitive components, including direct, indirect, cumulative and induced impacts in the scope of the subproject (EARF, 2016). Therefore, each proposed subproject in FIP-1 program for S1/2018 has examined related to the type, location, scale and sensitivity and the magnitude of the potential environmental impacts.

12. The categorization for subproject should be included into ADB project categories and National categories, which explained in Table 3.

Table 3. Comparison between ADB and the Government’s Project Categories

ADB Project Categories AMDAL Project Policies

▪ Category A: Projects with potential for significant adverse environmental impacts, requiring an EIA.

AMDAL: Projects with potential for substantial impacts on the environment require AMDAL (including ToR, ANDAL, and RKL/RPL).

▪ Category B: Projects judged to have some adverse environmental impacts, but of lesser degree and/or significance than category A projects. Category B projects require IEE.

UKL-UPL: Projects are not required to have AMDAL but are obliged to have an UKL/UPL.

SPPLH: Projects that do not require AMDAL or UKL/UPL are obliged to submit a Statement of Management and Environmental Monitoring Ability or SPPL.

▪ Category C: Projects unlikely to have adverse environmental impacts.

SPPLH: Projects that do not require AMDAL or UKL/UPL are obliged to submit a Statement of Management and Environmental Monitoring Ability or SPPL.

Source: EARF, 2016

13. Not all of sub-projects has been implemented in the Semester 1/2018, therefore, screening and categorization activities has been carried out only for subproject as listed in Table 4.

Table 4. Status of Project Screening and Categorization in S1/2018

Sub-projects Planned for 2018

ADB Requirements Status Government of Indonesia

Requirements

Status

Agroforestry

(Conducted by

BPSKL)

REA – Screening Checklist for

Agroforestry -

Appendix A6

Completed

SPPL (does not have

an potential impact,

but still need to

manage)

Not

completed

Rubber Plantation

(Conducted by

BPSKL)

Completed

SPPL (does not have


but still need to

manage)

Not

completed

Microhydro Power

Plant (will conducted

by BPSKL)

REA – Screening Checklist for Micro

Hydro Power-

Appendix A7

In - progress

UKL-UPL (Within

Protected forest)

Not

completed


Solar Panel (BPSKL

as IA will appoint the

third party to install

the equipment)

REA – Screening Checklist for Solar

Panel - Appendix A8

Completed

SPPL (does not have


but still need to

manage)

Not

Completed

Drinking Water

Facilities (will conduct

by BPSKL)

REA – Screening Checklist for Drinking

Water Facilities

Not Completed Not Yet Categorized Not

Completed

Road Rehabilitation

(will conduct By

BPSHP)

REA – Screening Checklist for Road

Rehabilitation

Not Completed Not Yet Categorized Not

Completed

3.2 ADB ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARD POLICY

14. ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) consists of three operational policies on the environment, indigenous peoples, and involuntary resettlement. The safeguard policies require that: (i) impacts are identified and assessed early in the project cycle; (ii) plans to avoid, minimize, mitigate, or compensate for the potential adverse impacts are developed and implemented; and (iii) affected people are informed and consulted during project preparation and implementation.

3.3 APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS IN INDONESIA

15. Indonesia’s relevant environmental laws and regulations focusing on managing the environmental impacts of development projects include:

▪ Law No. 32/2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management;

▪ Ministry of Environmental Regulation No. 5/2012 on Activities Requiring AMDAL Study;

▪ Ministry of Environmental Regulation No. 16/2012 on Guidance to prepare Environmental Documents;

▪ Ministry of Environmental Regulation No. 17/2012 concerning Public Participation and Information Disclosure in AMDAL Process; and

▪ Government Regulation No. 27/2012 on Environmental Permit.

16. Other pertinent legislation includes: Law No. 2/2012 on Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest provides the framework for land acquisition, resettlement, and compensation in Indonesia. Presidential Regulation No. 71/2012 (Implementation of Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest) implements Law No. 2/2012. It is confirmed that the FIP-1 project will not need such a land acquisition process as all activities will be implemented within Indonesian Government lands.

17. Three regulations issued by the Ministry of Forestry support carbon sequestration and REDD+ activities: (1) Minister of Forestry Regulation No. P.36/Menhut-II/2009 regarding License Procedures for Carbon Sequestration and / or Carbon Storage Business in Forest Production and Protection Forests; (2) Minister of Forestry Regulation No. P.68/Menhut-II/2008 regarding Implementation of Demonstration Activities for Reducing Carbon Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation; and (3) Minister of Forestry Regulation No.


P.30/Menhut-II/2009 regarding Procedures to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation. These regulations support SFM and environmental services.

18. West Kalimantan Regulation No. 7/1988 on Management and Conservation of the Environment and West Kalimantan Governor Decree No. 120/1989 on Environmental Quality Standards guide environmental management at the provincial level.

3.4 IMPLEMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES

19. After the screening process and categorization is carried out for each key project as described in Section 3.1, a mitigation and monitoring action plan is developed. The detailed impact assessment of project activities during the pre-construction, construction and operational stages is presented in Appendix A5.

Table 5. Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures in Semester 1/2018

Key-Project Location Impacts Proposed Mitigation

Mitigation Implemented

Compliance Status/Remarks

Agroforestry 40 ha and Rubber Plantation 20 ha – these activities have not been conducted.

Radin Jaya Village

▪ Poor selection in agro and rubber plantation site potentially emerge conflict among local community.

▪ Non-local seed potentially disturb the local biodiversity.

▪ Public Consultation

▪ Select local seed for used in Agroforestry and Rubber Plantation (it will suitable with the local environment)

Only the Public Consultation has been conducted at this village.

Not applicable at this stage

▪ Poor selection of plantation and agro sites can lead into land clearing and habitat loss.

▪ Best Land Use Practices

▪ Minimize land opening and keep existing trees

▪ Implemented in degraded area

None as the project activity has not been started.

Not applicable at this stage.

▪ The use of inorganic fertilizers is thought to cause soil and water pollution around the planting area.

▪ Periodically monitor the nutrient state of the plants and the soil quality to determine correct level of fertilizer application;. Do not over fertilize.



Solar Panel – this is procurement activity which has not been conducted

Radin Jaya Village

Procurement (Goods)

▪ No Need for Mitigation



Micro Hydro Power Plant – this activity has not been conducted

Kayu Dujung Village

▪ Poor Selection of location could lead to habitat loss and

▪ Conduct a Feasibility Study and Detail Engineering Design.




Key-Project Location Impacts Proposed Mitigation

Mitigation Implemented

Compliance Status/Remarks

biodiversity disturbances

▪ Poor consideration of land status and ownerships could arise a potential conflict

▪ Obtain Permit in Protected Forest

▪ Obtain Environmental Permit from local authority

Water quality predicted to decrease during the construct ion.

▪ Monitoring water quality continually

Drinking Water Facilities

All Villages in Sintang and Kapuas Hulu District.

Will implemented in the next reporting period (S2/2018) due to uncertainty of site selection. For the next plan, BPSKL as IA, will communicate with Village Facilitators and District Coordinator for the location of Drinking facilities.

Not Complaint

Road Rehabilitation

All Villages in Sintang and Kapuas Hulu District.

Will implemented in the next reporting period (S2/2018) due to uncertainty of site selection. For the next plan, BPHP as IA, will communicate with Village Facilitators and District Coordinator for the location of Drinking facilities.

Not Complaint

Source: AWP, 2018 and EARF 2016

3.5 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND RESPONSIBILLITY

20. All institutions involved in the FIP-1 program participate in the environmental monitoring activities of each project. The main objective of the involvement of all institutions, both EA, IA, UPT, and PISU is to maintain the framework for implementing each activity so as not to have a negative impact on the surrounding environment. Explanation of the roles and responsibilities of each institution is provided in Table 6.

Table 6. Institutional Responsibilities for Environmental Monitoring

Project Implementation Organization

Management Roles and Responsibilities

Status/Remarks

PCU (Project Coordination Unit)

Will responsible for monitoring and evaluation for all FIP project in Indonesia. PCU will report the project progress to FIP focal point.

Monitoring, evaluation and communication of FIP-1 project from January – December 2018.

PMU (Project Management Unit)

PMU will responsible to manage the project of FIP-1, including monitoring and evaluation as well. PMU also coordinating all technical aspects with EA. PMU also involved in the flows of reporting from PISU, IA, and EA.

During the reporting period, PMU has been involved in several activities regarding monitoring and evaluation for administration aspect regarding FIP-1 whether in Sintang or Putussibau Disrict.

The Project’s EA (Dir. of BUPSHA, DG of PSKL, MoEF)

The EA will oversee project activities as per standards and requirements of the financing modality and will coordinate with MOF and ADB to ensure that the flow of funds is well organized.

During the reporting period, EA acted as supervisor and assessor about the progress of each activity both IA / UPT and PISU. The progress stated in preliminary, quarterly, and semi-annual reports.


Project Implementation Organization

Management Roles and Responsibilities

Status/Remarks

The Project’s IA (Dir of BUPSHA-DG of PSKL, Dir of PJLHK-DG of KSDAE, and Dir of KPHP-DG of PHPL)

Coordinating and managing project activities under each agency. Providing technical advice to the project through the UPT. Obtaining the required environmental approvals from each department, and carrying out inspections of project facility's quality control.

BUPSHA has managed and supervised all the sub-project, which has implemented during 2018 through BPSKL, BBTNBKDS and BPHP. Moreover, together with PISU ensure that safeguard aspect included into AWP and Term Of Refencees of each sub-project.

Technical Implementation Unit (UPT) (BPSKL in Banjarbaru, BPHP in Pontianak, and BBTNBKDS in Putussibau)

Providing technical guidance to PISU and KPH staff in the project activities and holding regular technical committee meetings to obtain directions for implementing project activities. Communicating with the relevant directorates at the national level.

For 2018, BPSKL has approved and conducted agroforestry (40 ha), rubber plantation (20 ha), and Solar panel (250 unit).

FMU (KPH) – KPH Sintang Utara, KPH Kapuas Hulu Utara and KPH Kapuas Hulu Selatan

FMU’s will supervised and monitored all the activities which is related to the FIP-1 program and ensure that all the activities are in line with RPHJP (Long-term Forest Management Plan).

In 2018, FMU has Support and involved in all activities in sites level with IA and PISU, as consultant and supervisor for each sub - project in Sintang, such as Agroforestry, rubber plantation and solar panel.

Project Implementation Supporting Unit (PISU)

As the supporting unit, PISU works at the different levels of implementation (national, provincial and district) and together with the IA and EA to prepare various technical aspects of key-projects, including risk and impact assessment that are likely to arise during implementation.

During January – June 2018, PISU has prepared workplan and technical assistant for EA, IA/UPT in order to implemented subprojects in Sintang and Kapuas Hulu District. Moreover, PISU has developed a good communication with FMU and local organization/institution in order to minimize problem in sites level.

Source: EARF and PAM 2016.

21. Lines of reporting and chains of coordination for conducting environmental monitoring are provided in Figure 3.


Figure 3. Project Organization for Environmental Monitoring

Source: EARF and PAM FIP-1, 2016

4.0 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 22. The GRM scheme and Complaint Form have been designed by PISU during the reporting period, (appendix 4) but not disseminated nor implemented yet.

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING STATUS 23. There is no monitoring action has been conducted during the reporting period. However, mitigation action plans have been prepared during the January – June 2018 period.

6.0 CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE 24. Consultations and project disclosure concerning Community-Focused Investments to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation were conducted several times between January 2018 and June 2018, as explained in Table 7 through briefing and public consultation, particularly with five targeted villages of the FIP-1 in Sintang District.


Table 7. Consultation and Project Disclosure

Date Phase/Topic Delivered Through Target Stakeholder Outcomes

12 – 15 February

2018

FIP-1 program in Kapuas

Hulu.

FMUs Kapuas Hulu

Office

FMU Kapuas Hulu

Utara, FMU Kapuas

Hulu Selatan, FMU

Sintang Utara, and

BBTNBKDS

FMUs receive project

briefing.

19 – 23 March

2018

FIP-1 program in Kapuas

Hulu.

Sub-District Kapuas

Hulu Office

Sub-district Embaloh

Hulu, Bunut Hilir,

Boyan Tanjung,

Mentebah, Putusibau

Selatan, Putusibau

Utara, Selimbau dan

Badau

Sub District

Stakeholder receive

project briefing.

19 – 22 April 2018

FIP-1 Program in Kapuas

Hulu Kapuas Hulu District

Head of Kapuas Hulu

District and Key

Person

All stakeholder in

Kapuas Hulu receive

project briefing.

18 – 28 May

2018

FIP-1 Program and

Subproject Detail for

2018, (All official minutes

in village level, including

attendant list and other

documentation for the

public consultations is

provided in Appendix A3.)

All five targeted

villages in Sintang

District.

Radin Jaya,

Senangan Jaya,

Senangan Kecil,

Tanjung Sari, and

Kayu Dujung Villages

Key village

Stakeholders, elders

and customary

community including

women received

project briefing

7.0 CAPACITY BUILDING UNDERTAKEN 25. Institutional capacity building related to environmental safeguards for staff of KPH, IA / UPT and the community at the FIP-1 project location has not been implemented in the first semester of 2018. The materials and schedules for this capacity building training is yet to be developed.

8.0 FINDINGS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION 26. Several findings has carried out during the reporting period, and corrective action that will implemented on the next report has explained in Table 8.

Table 8. Findings and Corrective Action During Reporting Period of S1/2018

Finding(s) Corrective Action Due Date Status and Remarks of

Corrective Actions

Mitigation Measures

Screening and categorization of the subprojects as part of the environmental assessment has not been adequately conducted.

Conduct adequate screening and categorization for each subproject by completing the required rapid environmental assessment (REA) checklist; preliminary climate risk screening checklist’ and sub-project environmental categorization form.

December 2018

To be reported in the quarterly progress and detailed in the semi-annual environmental monitoring report.


Monitoring

During January – June 2018, there is no monitoring activities for each subproject, only public consultation regarding FIP-1 program in general.

Conduct adequate Monitoring action for each subproject by following mitigation action plan that has been organized.

December 2018

To be reported on quarterly progress and detailed in the semi-annual environmental monitoring report.

Capacity Building

During reporting period, capacity development for four FMU’s and others such as training, workshop, seminars have not be implemented due to non-allocated budget in BPHP AWP 2018.

PISU has started to give an input regarding trainings, workshops and others to develop capability in safeguard environment, by discuss intensively regarding AWP 2019 with BPHP.

February 2019

To be reported on quarterly progress and detailed in the semi-annual environmental monitoring report

Grievance Readdress Mechanism (GRM)

The GRM mechanism has not implemented during the reporting period, however, the scheme and complaint form has been organized by PISU.

GRM needs to be discussed with the local government at the site level (Village, District, Regency, Province, etc.), as well as the FMU, as a locus of FIP-1 activities, and the next stage, must be socialized to indigenous peoples.

February 2019


Environmental Assessment

Screening and categorization for drinking water facilities and Road Rehabilitation in 2018 has not been conducted due to uncertainty location from IA/UPT

It is necessary to set the target village and the implementation timeline in accordance with the annual work plan (AWP) from each IA (BPHP, BPSKL, BBTNBKDS), so that the screening process can be carried out properly.

February 2019



9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 27. Conclusions. Key conclusions drawn from the environmental safeguards monitoring report of Semester 1/2018 are as follows:

▪ No physical activities on the ground have been conducted as part of the FIP-1 due to procurement process by IA/UPT is always delayed and the allocation of time for implementing activities changes, therefore corresponding environmental mitigation and monitoring have not been conducted.

▪ Public consultations regarding FIP-1 program has been conducted on Day-month-year at five targeted villages in Sintang District. The community members attending these public consultations agreed to participate in the FIP-1 programs (including women), for land base or non-land base activities.

▪ Screening and categorization has been carried out for Agroforestry (40 ha) and Rubber Plantation (20 ha) at Radin Jaya Village, in Sintang District as per the requirements of Government Regulation No. 27/2012 and Ministry of Environment Regulation No. 5/2012 and ADB checklists.

▪ During the reporting period, the capacity development for FMUs, has not implemented due to non-allocation budget by BPHP as IA to conducted that activities.

▪ GRM scheme and complaint form has created by PISU; however, has not implemented yet during reporting period. PISU will consult the draft with FMUs and IA, and implement it on S2/2018.

28. Recommendations. Based on the conclusions presented above, the following actions are recommended:

▪ PISU should work together with IA, such as BPHP, BPSKL, and BBTNBKDS for sharing and discuss regarding AWP 2018, and 2019.

▪ All EA and IA should maximize the role of FMUs as “institution in charge/locus owner” for supervise and monitor each sub-project, and discuss with PISU regarding Environmental Safeguard aspects.

▪ There must fieldwork activity conducted in order to complete checklist for screening or even for categorize the subproject. However, the screening and categorization of should involve FMU’s, and in order to obtained the environmental permit should obtained from BLHD whether SPPL or UKL/UPL.


10.0 REFERENCES ADB, 2016. Project Administration Manual, 2016, Forest Investment Program – 1, Community-Focused

Investments to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Project.

ADB, 2016. Environmental Assesment Review Framework, Forest Investment Program – 1. Community-Focused Investments to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation Project.

ADB Policy Paper, 2009, ADB Safeguard Policy Statement.

Government of Indonesia, Law No. 32/2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management.

Government of Indonesia, 2012. Government Regulation No. 27/2012 on Environmental Permit.

Ministry of Environmental and Forestry (MoEF), Government of Indonesia, 2012.

MoEF Regulation No. 5/2012 on Activities Requiring AMDAL Study.

MoEF Regulation No. 16/2012 on Guidance to prepare Environmental Documents.

MoEF Regulation No. 17/2012 concerning Public Participation and Information Disclosure in AMDAL

Process.

West Kalimantan Province Government, No. 7/1988 on Management and Conservation of the

Environment.

West Kalimantan Governor Decree No. 120/1989 on Environmental Quality Standards guide

environmental management at the provincial level.

National Standard of Indonesia, 2008. SNI 7313 – 2008, Maximum limit of pesticide residues on agricultural product

APPENDICES

Appendix 1 Proposed Location of Agroforestry and Rubber Plantation in Radin Jaya Village

Appendix 1: Proposed Location of Agroforestry and Rubber Plantation in Radin Jaya Village

Appendix 2 Official Minutes of Public Consultation

Appendix 2: Official Minutes of Public Consultation

Official Minute – Radin Jaya Village

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------

Official Minute – Kayu Dujung Village

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------

Official Minute – Senangan Jaya Village

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------

Official Minute – Senangan Kecil Village

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------

Official Minute – Tanjung Sari Village

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------

Appendix 3 Public Consultation

Appendix A3 Public Consultation

Senangan Jaya Village (12/April/2018) Senangan Kecil Village (13/April/2018)

Signing Of Minuttes in Senangan Jaya

(13/April/2018)

Radin Jaya Village (13/April/2018)

Pubic Consultation of Agroforestry, in Radin Jaya

Village (21/May/2018)

Public Consultation of Agroforestry, in Radin

Jaya Village (21/May/2018)

Appendix 4 GRM Scheme and Complaint Form (GRM)

Appendix 4 A: GRM Scheme and Complaint Form (GRM)

AP = Affected Person, AH = Affected Household, GPP = Grievance Point Person

Valid

GPP (Site Level)

Step (2)

Affected Person (AP)/

Affected Household (AH) Step (1)

Verification (Complaint

Material/content)

Complaint Registration (Fill in

Complaint Form)

Yes Discuss in Village Level

(7 Days)

(Step 3)

No Solution Reached

Yes Discuss in Sub-District Level

(14 Days)

(Step 4) Court

No Solution Reached

Yes Discuss in District Level

(14 Days)

(Step 5)

No Solution Reached

Yes Discuss in Provincial Level

(22 Days)

(Step 6)

No Solution Reached

Yes

Discuss in MoEF

Government Of Indonesia

(22 Days)

(Step 7)

No Solution Reached

Complaint has Solved

and mitigation has

implemented

Appendix 4 B : Complaint Form ADB FIP-1

Filled by PISU FIP-1 (Village Facilitator):

Filled by Informer

Informer Detail:

Name :

Address :

Phone :

Fax :

E-mail :

Complaint Information

Location :

Programme :

Reporter Party :

Date of Occurrence :

Contents of Complaint:

(Complete with evidence or related documents) (If this part is not enough, you can use additional paper)

Name and Signature of Informer

Date:

Name and Signature

Recipient of the Complaint

Date:

Information: Forms are made in 2 copies: 1 (one) sheet for Informer and second sheet for archives.

Complaint No. Date:

Informer

Source/s sms/e-mail/postmail/fax/phone/visit/others: .....................

Appendix 5 Environmental Impact Assessment

and Mitigation Action Potential

Appendix 5: Environmental Impact Assesment and Mitigation Action Potential

Impact, Mitigation Plan, and Implemented in 2018

Key-Projects Activities Phase Potential Impact Mitigation Plan Implemented on S1/2018

Agroforestry (75 ha) and Rubber Plantation 20 ha

Pre-Construction Phase

▪ Land Preparation (site Selection)

▪ The Status of land’s ownerships and permission can create potential conflict

between the local community and the

program itself.

▪ Poor selection of plantation sites could lead to land clearing and habitat loss.

▪ Conduct socialization to the beneficiaries of Agroforestry benefits, so all community

groups can receive the activity.

▪ Coordinate with local government to get the clearance/permit of land/region where

Agroforestry Activity take place.

▪ Implemented in Degraded Area

▪ Socialization and agreement

regarding key-project – completed (poured in official

minute of letter)

▪ Permit/Clearance from

Directorate of General

PSKL

▪ Land Clearing ▪ Land clearing is estimated to cause permanent or temporary disturbances,

and damage existing vegetation (for

example, use of herbicides for round up,

or activity of burning), will disrupt animal

traces, wipe out small animal and plants,

increase overland flow and soil erosion,

or incurs a soil nutrient loss.

▪ The remaining land clearing, which is debris/crumbs, can increase the risk of

forest fires.

▪ No specific land clearing programmed under land-based activities before plant

ation establish ment and land clear ing will

be minimized during operations

▪ Activities need to be stopped if protected species (as defined by Government

Regulation No.7 / 1999, and MoEF No

20/2018, concerning Wildlife and Animal

Conservation and Red List IUCN) are

found during land rehabilitation work.

▪ The remnants of land clearing must be collected and transferred to other place or

put in together garbage dump.

Not Started

▪ Seed Selection ▪ Introduce a New Species, will predicted can disturb local biodiversity condition.

▪ Select local seed for used in Agroforestry and Rubber Plantation (it will suitable with

the local environment)

▪ Build temporary shelters for nurseries near Agroforestry areas.

Not Started

▪ Material and Seed Distribution

▪ The distribution of Material and seed for 75 ha and 20 ha will need a heavy

transportation such as truck, and it will

predicted to increase air pollution.

▪ Using alternative transportation that is environmentally friendly (for example:

using animals as a carrier, or participation

Not Started


▪ Needs of road in order to distribute material or seed, so it can increase runoff

and devastate plant habitat.

▪ If the area near the protected forest, it can predict to disturb animal, or devastate

plants habitat.

of local community to move seed from

truck to Agroforestry area).

▪ shorten the distance between the nursery and Agroforestry land

Construction Phase

▪ Land Practices ▪ Poor land clearing practices could increase soil erosion and soil nutrient loss.

▪ Land Practices estimated to change land surface and increase run off capacity.

▪ Implement site-appropriate agroforestry management practices to reduce erosion

(e.g., terracing, silt pitting, and bunding),

enrich soils (e.g., leguminous cover plants

▪ between the rows to assist with nitrogen fixation), and improve soil physical

properties (e.g., moisture retention and

infiltration).

Not Started

▪ Planting Activities ▪ Planting Activities Estimated to threaten the existence of protected flora and fauna

(endangered species)

▪ If the planting activity near protected forest it will threaten an endemic species.

▪ Workers who will carry out planting activities are expected to pose a threat to

the flora and fauna in the protected forest.

▪ Needs for close supervision regarding the invasion of plant seeds that can interfere

with endemic species in the region.

▪ It is necessary to monitor labor, which will carry out Agroforestry activities to not take

actions that threaten the existence of

biodiversity in the protected forest such as

hunting, disturbing, or even forest

encroachment activities.

Not Started

Operasional Phase

▪ Carry out the remaining material (such polybag,

stake, etc)

▪ It is estimated that it will have a potential impact due to the accumulation of residual

plant material

▪ The remnants of land clearing must be collected and transferred to other place or


Not Started

▪ Maintain Plant Growth by giving pesticide and fertilizer

▪ Excess fertilizer use could damage soils, pollute water supplies for biodiversity and

humans, and directly or indirectly

endanger the health of the residents,

livestock, crops, and wild animals.

▪ Use SNI approved fertilizers.

▪ Prioritize the use of organic fertilizers.

▪ Periodically monitor the nutrient state of the plants and the soil quality to determine

Not Started


▪ The use of inorganic fertilizers is thought to cause soil and water pollution around

the planting area.

▪ The use of pesticide without the right measurement can create land and water

pollution surround the area.

correct level of fertilizer application;. Do not

over fertilize.

▪ Agroforestry activities are directed at using organic fertilizer. For the beginning of

planting (1 year early) can use inorganic

fertilizer that is Indonesian National Certified

(SNI), but the next year is required to use

organic fertilizer (or replacing with

composting waste vegetation).

▪ Using Standard and Registered Pesticide (Regulation of pesticide use must be based

on SNI 7313 – 2008) ▪ During the maintenance phase the plant is

kept clean so as not to pollute the soil and

water around it.

Land Rehabilitation (Rubber Plantation) 20 ha

Pre-Construction phase

▪ Land Preparation (Site Selection)

▪ Poor selection of plantation sites could lead to land clearing and habitat loss.

▪ Land Status has predicted will arise the potential risk.

▪ Poor coordination with local government can create potential conflict between the

local community and the program itself.

▪ Land clearing is estimated to cause temporary or even permanent

disturbances, and threaten the existing

vegetation (for example, use of herbicides

for round up, or activity of burning) in a big

scale, will disrupt animal habitat, wipe out

small animal and plants, increase overland

flow and soil erosion.

▪ The activity can cause a soil nutrient loss. The remaining land clearing, which is

debris/crumbs, can increase the risk of

forest fires.

▪ Implement plantation activity only in degraded areas,

▪ Public consultation required to the beneficiaries of Land Rehabilitation benefits,

so the activity can be received by all

community groups.

▪ Coordinate with local government to get the clearance/permit of land/region where

Rubber Plantation Activity take place.

▪ Activities need to be stopped if protected species (as defined by Government

Regulation No.7 / 1999, and MoEF No

20/2018, concerning Wildlife and Animal

Conservation and Red List IUCN) are found

during land rehabilitation work.

▪ The remnants during land clearing must be collected and transferred to other place or


▪ Sosialization and agreement regarding key-

project – completed ▪ Permit/Clearance from

Directorate of General

PSKL


▪ Selection seed of Rubber for 20 ha

▪ Use of non-local seeds results in poorly adapted plantations and loss of local

biodiversity.

▪ Select local seeds for plantations, to maintain local biodiversity and ensure that

plants are adapted to local conditions.

Not Started

▪ Material and Seed Distribution

▪ The distribution of Material and seed for 50 ha will need a heavy transportation

such as truck, and it will have predicted to

increase air pollution.

▪ needs road in order to distribute material or seed, so it can increase runoff and

devastate plant habitat

▪ If the area near the protected forest, it can predict to disturb animal, or devastate

plants habitat.

▪ Prepared temporary shelters for nurseries near Plantation areas.

▪ using alternative transportation that is environmentally friendly (for example:

using animals as a carrier, or participation

of local community to move seed from

truck to Plantation area).

▪ shorten the distance between the nursery and Plantation area

Not Started

Construction phase

▪ Land Practices ▪ Land Practices are estimated to change land surface and increase run off

capacity.

▪ Poor farm practices, related to management of vegetation debris, could

increase the risk of fire.

▪ Implement site-appropriate Rubber Plantation management practices to

reduce erosion and run off capacity.

▪ Land clearing or cleaning for plantations will be avoided or minimized.

▪ Apply an appropriate waste management system for vegetation debris (e.g., compost

the debris and use as fertilizer or soil

conditioner).

Not Started

▪ Planting Activities ▪ Planting Activities Estimated to threaten the existence of protected flora and

fauna (endangered species)

▪ If the planting activity near protected forest it will threaten an endemic

species.

▪ Workers who will carry out planting activities are expected to pose a threat

to the flora and fauna in the protected

forest.

▪ Needs for close supervision regarding the invasion of plant seeds that can interfere

with endemic species in the region.

▪ It is necessary to monitor labor, which will carry out land rehabilitation activities to not

take actions that threaten the existence of

biodiversity in the protected forest such as

hunting, disturbing, or even forest

encroachment activities

Not Started


. Operational Phase

▪ Carry out the remaining material (such polybag,

stake)

▪ Poor farm practices, related to management of vegetation debris, could

increase the risk of fire.

▪ It is estimated that it will have a potential impact due to the accumulation of

residual plant material

▪ The remnants after planting activity must be collected and transferred to other place

or put in together garbage dump.

▪ Replacing with composting waste vegetation. Regulation of pesticide use

must be based on SNI.

▪ During the maintenance phase the plant is kept clean so as not to pollute the soil and

water around it.

Not Started

▪ Maintain Plant Growth by giving pesticide and fertilizer

▪ Pesticide without the right measurement can create land and water pollution

surround the area.

▪ Non-organic fertilizers is thought to cause soil and water pollution around the

planting area.

▪ Avoid the use of inorganic pesticides.

▪ Avoid using herbicides.

▪ Apply only SNI certified pesticides.

▪ Collect and correctly manage pesticide wastes (e.g., excess chemical or

packaging must be sent to a central

facility).

▪ Rubber Plantation activities are directed at using organic fertilizer. For the beginning of

planting (1 year early) can use inorganic

fertilizer that is Indonesian National

Certified (SNI), but the next year is required

to use organic fertilizer.

Not Started

Micro Hydro Power Plant (40 KW)

Pre-Construction Activities.

▪ Land Preparation (Site Selection)

▪ Poor Selection of location could lead to habitat loss and biodiversity disturbances

▪ Poor consideration of land status and ownerships could arise a potential conflict

▪ Conduct a Feasibility Study and Detail Engineering Design.

▪ Obtain Permit in Protected Forest (IPPKH)

▪ Needs Clearance from local Authority (PIPPIB)

In - Progress

▪ Land Clearing ▪ Land clearing is estimated could lead to temporary or permanent disturbances, and

damage existing vegetation (for example,

▪ No specific land clearing programmed under land-based activities before

Construction establishment and land

Not-Started


use of herbicides for round up, or activity of

burning), will disrupt animal traces, wipe

out small animal and plants, increase

overland flow and soil erosion, or incurs a

soil nutrient loss.

clearing will be minimized during

operations.

Construction Phase

▪ Material Distribution ▪ The distribution of turbin and pipes Material ha will need a heavy

transportation such as truck, and it will

predicted to increase air pollution (dust

particle).

▪

▪ Prepare the laydown area, near construction site.

▪ Rearrange the schedule settings and the maximum amount of transportation of tools

and materials

▪ Participation of local community in order to carry- out the material

Not-Started

▪ Build the Inspection Road ▪ Air Pollution and surface run off predicted to increase during the build of inspection

road.

▪ Create drainage channel in order to minimize the surface run off.

Not-Started

▪ Assembling turbin and generator

▪ Water quality predicted to decrease during the construct ion

▪ Builds the temporary water storage to supply water during the construction

activity

▪ Monitoring water quality continually.

Not-Started

Operational Activities

▪ Turbin operational ▪ Water availability fluctuates too much, causing power generation issues (electric

force will be weakened if the source of the

water fluctuates too much).

▪ Correctly site micro hydropower to avoid water availability problems.

▪ Promote reforestation in upstream of the river/stream to avoid reduction of water

flow

Not-Started

▪ Maintenance Activities ▪ Oil spill and paints during the maintain of turbin/generator can decrease water quality

▪ Close Supervise during maintenance activity.

▪ Water quality monitoring every 6 month.

Not-Started

Appendix 6 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA)

Checklist for Forestry in Radin Jaya Village

Appendix 6 Rapid Environmental Assesment (REA) Checklist For Forestry in Radin Jaya Village

Instructions:

Country/Project Title: Sector Division:

INO/FIP-1/Agroforestry and Rubber Plantation

Radin Jaya Village

Screening Questions Yes No Remarks

A. Project Siting Is the Project area adjacent to or within any of the following environmentally sensitive areas?

▪ Cultural heritage site v ▪ Protected Area v ▪ Wetland v ▪ Mangrove v ▪ Estuarine v ▪ Buffer zone of protected area v The Location is adjacent to the Kapuas

River.

▪ Special area for protecting biodiversity v B. Potential Environmental Impacts will the project cause?

▪ Increase in soil erosion and siltation? v ▪ Increase in peak and flood flows? v

▪ Loss of downstream beneficial uses (water supply or fisheries)?

v

▪ Impairment of ecological and recreational opportunities?

v

▪ Impairment of beneficial uses of traditional forests?

v

▪ Any loss of precious ecology? v

▪ Possible conflicts with established management policies?

v This activity was discussed with the KPH – Sintang Utara dan BPSKL as IA.

▪ Dislocation or involuntary resettlement of people?

v

FORESTRY

(i) Project. It is to be attached to the environmental categorization form and submitted to the

Environment and Safeguards Division (SDES) for endorsement by Director, SDES and for

approval by the Chief Compliance Officer.

(ii) This checklist focuses on environmental issues and concerns. To ensure that social

dimensions are adequately considered, refer also to ADB's (a) checklists on involuntary resettlement and Indigenous Peoples; (b) poverty reduction handbook; (c) staff guide to consultation and participation; and (d) gender checklists.

(iii) Answer the questions assuming the “without mitigation” case. The purpose is to identify

potential impacts. Use the “remarks” section to discuss any anticipated mitigation measures.


▪ Loss of downstream ecological and economic functions due to any construction of social infrastructure (e.g., road, training or information center, office or housing)?

v

▪ Displacement of people or reduce their access to forest resources?

v

▪ Disproportionate impacts on the poor, women and children, Indigenous Peoples or other vulnerable groups?

v

▪ Uncontrolled in-migration, including the influx of workers and their followers, with opening of roads to forest area and overloading of social infrastructure?

v

▪ Unnecessary loss of ecological value and decreased biodiversity by replacement of natural forest with plantation with limited number of species?

v

▪ Technology or land use modification that may change present social and economic activities?

v

▪ Ecological problems as well as community health and safety hazards due to land clearance prior to reforestation (e.g., soil erosion, disruption of hydrological cycle, loss of nutrients, decline in soil fertility)?

v

▪ Other ecological problems as well as community health and safety hazards (e.g., pollution of water bodies from fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides used in the

v

▪ Dangers to a safe and healthy working environment due to physical, chemical and biological hazards during project construction and operation?

v

▪ Social problems and conflicts related to land tenure and resource use rights?

v

▪ Social conflicts if workers from other regions or countries are hired?

v

▪ Risks to community health and safety due to the transport, storage and/or disposal of materials such as explosives, fuel, pesticide and other chemicals during construction and operation?

v

A Checklist for Preliminary Climate Risk Screening (Forestry)

Screening Questions Score Remarks21

Location and Design of project

Is siting and/or routing of the project (or its components) likely to be affected by climate conditions including extreme weather r e l a t e d events such as floods, droughts, storms, landslides?

0

Would the project design (e.g. the clearance for bridges) need to consider any hydro-meteorological parameters (e.g., sea- level, peak river flow, reliable water level, peak wind speed etc.)?

0

Materials and Maintenance

Would weather, current and likely future climate conditions (e.g. prevailing humidity level, temperature contrast between hot summer days and cold winter days, exposure to wind and humidity hydro-meteorological parameters likely affect the selection of project inputs over the life of project outputs (e.g. construction material)?

0

Would weather, current and likely future climate conditions, and related extreme events likely affect the maintenance (scheduling and cost) of project output(s)?

0

Performance of project outputs

Would weather/climate conditions and related extreme events likely affect the performance (e.g. annual power production) of project output(s) (e.g. hydro-power generation facilities) throughout their design life time?

0

Options for answers and corresponding score are provided below:

Response Score

Not Likely 0 Likely 1

Very Likely 2

Responses when added that provide a score of 0 will be considered low risk project. If adding all responses will result to a score of 1-4 and that no score of 2 was given to any single response, the project will be assigned a m e d i u m r i s k category. A total score of 5 or more (which include providing a score of 1 in all responses) or a 2 in any single response will be categorized as high risk project.

Result of Initial Screening (Low, Medium, High): Low

Other Comments:

Prepared by: Fransz.S.S

Environmental Safeguard Specialist

21 If possible, provide details on the sensitivity of project components to climate conditions, such as how climate parameters are considered in design standards for infrastructure components, how changes in key climate parameters and sea level might affect the siting/routing of project, the selection of construction material and/or scheduling, performances and/or the maintenance cost/scheduling of project output

Country/Project Title: INO/FIP-1/Agroforestry and Rubber Plantation Sector : Radin Jaya Subsector: - Division/Department: Environmental Safeguard

Environmental Screening and Categorization of Agroforestry and Rubber Plantation

I. SUBPROJECT INFORMATION Subproject Title: Agroforestry and Rubber Plantation Location: Radin Jaya Village

Physical Target: -

General Specifications:

II. PARAMETERS FOR RAPID ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (REA) Bold font in italics were derived from ADB REA checklist

Answers for the question being asked may either be “Yes”, “No”, or “N/A”. “N/A” means not applicable for the subproject. Under the Remarks column, environmentally sensitive or critical area is specified, indicating if the subproject is only adjacent to, or if it is within the area.

SCREENING QUESTIONS

ANSWER (YES, NO, OR N/A)

REMARKS

A. Sub-Project Siting

Is the subproject area adjacent to or within any of the following environmentally sensitive areas (by ADB*) or critical areas?

a. All areas declared by law as national parks, watershed reserves, wildlife preserves and sanctuaries.

(protected area, buffer zone of protected area, special area for protecting biodiversity)*

No

b. Areas set aside as aesthetic potential tourist spots; areas reserved by appropriate authorities for tourism development.

No

c. Areas which constitute the habitat for endangered or threatened species of indigenous Indonesian Wildlife (flora and fauna).

No

d. Areas of unique historic, archaeological, or scientific interests; includes national historical landmarks, geological monuments, and paleontological and anthropological reservations as may be designated or determined by relevant governmental institutions.

No

e. Areas which are traditionally occupied by customary communities or tribes; No

Ancestral lands of customary communities No

All areas that are occupied or claimed as ancestral lands or ancestral domains by Masyarakat hukum adat (MHA) communities, or certified as such.

No

f. Areas frequently visited and/or hard-hit by natural calamities (geologic hazards, floods, typhoons, volcanic activity, etc.);

No

Areas frequently visited or hard hit by earthquakes: all areas subjected to earthquakes of at least intensity VII in the Rossi-Forel scale during the period 1949 until the year of reckoning orl areas identified as such by the Indonesian relevant agency such as Meteorology and Geophysics Agency (Badan Meteorologi dan Geofisika / BMG)

No

Flood-prone areas: low-lying areas usually adjacent to large active water bodies experiencing regular or seasonal inundation as a result of changes in mean water level of these water bodies.

No

Areas prone to volcanic activities: all areas identified as such by the center for volcanology and geological hazard mitigation (Pusat Vulkanologi dan Mitigasi Bencana Geologi)

No

Areas located along fault lines or within fault zones: This refers to all areas identified as such by the center for volcanology and geological hazard mitigation

No

Drought-prone areas: all areas identified as such by the relevant Indonesian agency

No

g. Areas with critical slopes; all lands with slope of 50% or more not classified in this listing as environmentally critical; also cover alienable and disposable forest lands and unclassified forests.

No

h. Areas classified as prime agricultural lands; all irrigated and irrigable areas and other areas:

No

i. Recharge areas of aquifers; sources of water replenishment where rainwater or seepage actually enters the aquifers: Areas under this classification shall be limited to all local or non-national watersheds and geothermal reservations.

No

j. Water bodies characterized by one or any combination of the following

conditions:

1) Tapped for domestic purposes No

2) Within the controlled and/or protected areas declared by appropriate authorities No

3) Which support wildlife and fisher activities (wetland, estuarine)* No

k. Mangrove areas characterized by one or any combination of the following conditions:

No

1) with primary pristine and dense young growth; No

2) adjoining mouth of major river systems; No

3) near or adjacent to traditional productive fry or fishing grounds; No

4) which act as natural buffers against shore erosion, strong winds and storm floods;

No

5) on which people are dependent for their livelihood. No

Areas declared as mangrove swamp forest reserves by the relevant Indonesian entity.

No

Is the sub-project siting consistent with the protected area zoning? No

Is the sub-project siting consistent with land use zoning of the area? Yes

B. Potential Environmental Impacts: Will the project likely causeO

Physical Environment

Land

1. Destabilization of slopes due to earthworks at the construction site? No

2. Erosion of river banks due to clearing/excavation operations? No

3. Soil erosion before compaction and lining of canals? No

4. Leaching of soil nutrients and changes in soil characteristics due to excessive application of irrigation water?

No

5. Soil salinization due to insufficient drainage? No

Hydrology

6. Redistribution of river flow or decrease in water flow rate downstream? No

7. Reduction of downstream water supply during peak seasons? No

8. Soil erosion and siltation leading to decreased stream capacity? Yes

9. Water logging along completed section of the irrigation canal as observed after heavy rains?

N/A

10. Obstruction of water flow due to aggregation of garbage at check gates/control gates

N/A

Water Quality

11. Deterioration of surface water quality due to the following:

a. Increased sediment run-off from the construction site? No During Construction activity only.

b. Improper disposal of sanitary and solid wastes from workers’ base camps? No c. Contamination from oil, grease and fuel spills? No

d. Excessive application of fertilizers and pesticides leading to discharge of agro- chemical contaminated waters from the service area?

No Close Supervised regarding pesticide and fertilizer utilization and conduct Monitoring of Residue of Fertilize ad Pesticide constantly

e. Salinization due to over pumping of groundwater, insufficient drainage? No 12. Will the project and/or its component infiltrate in community water source? No Air Quality

13. Deterioration of air quality due to the following impacts arising from heavy equipment operations and other construction works:

a. Dust suspension? Yes During Material distribution and Construction Activity Only

b. Obnoxious gas & particulate emissions? No

c. Noise generation? No During Material distribution and Construction Activity Only

Biological Environment

14. Tree cutting or vegetation clearing? No

15. Dislocation, disruption or other disturbance to terrestrial wildlife? No During construction activities only.

16. Impediments to movements of animals? No

17. Loss of precious ecological values (e.g. result of encroachment into forests/swamplands or historical/cultural buildings/areas, disruption of hydrology of natural waterways, regional flooding, and drainage hazards)?

No

18. Localized damage and/or disturbance to ecologically significant/economically important flora and fauna in forest areas/other critical habitats or agricultural crops?

No

19. Smothering or other adverse effects on aquatic species? No

20. Will the project make use of non-native, invasive and/or alien species? No

21. Will the project involve harvesting of major and/or minor forest products? No

22. Will there be modification of habitats such as change of forest/ crop species? Yes Substitue with Local Species

23. Is the project area vulnerable to wild fire? Yes During the construction activity only.

Social Environment

24. Disfiguration of landscape in historical/cultural areas? No

25. Dislocation or involuntary resettlement of people along the right-of-way? No

26. Loss of private land rights/ownership/property of the right-of-way of the project? No

27. Encroachment of informal dwellers along the irrigation canals/dikes? No

28. Increase in cropping intensity or cropping area? Yes

29. Loss of income from crop damage along the right-of-way? Yes

30. Exposure of workers to emergency or hazards of flashfloods? No

31. Obstruction of public access through the construction area, delaying people movement and transport of farm products?

No

32. Generation of solid waste and sanitary waste in construction camps and work sites?

No

33. Increased health risk from the increase in the population of rodents, insects or other vectors of disease during construction?

No

34. Increase in incidence of waterborne or water related diseases? No

35. Non-participation of customary communities in sub-project planning to implementation?

No

36. Gender issues (non-participation of women and other marginalized sectors in sub-project planning to implementation)

No

III. Key Issues Identified

1.

2.

3.

Per item 137 ADB EA Guidelines, 2003, environmentallysensitiveissues include the following: Destructive to tropical forest, conversion of wetlands, potential adverse effects of protected areas, encroachment on lands or rights of IPs or other vulnerable minorities, involuntary resettlement, toxic waste disposal. IV. MOEF CATEGORIZATION (check appropriate box to determine requirement)

Category A □ Category B □ Category C* √ Category D □ Remarks: V. RECOMMEDED ADB ENVIRONMENTALCATEGORY (check appropriate box to determine requirement)

A □ B □ C √ see requirements below Remarks: No environmentally sensitive issue apart from key issues raised during screening process. All key issues are mitigatable at the local community level and during sub-project design or thru the sub-projects operation and maintenance.

BASIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS

Category A Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Environmental Management Plan including a Budget Public Consultation (at least twice) Disclosure 120 days in advance of Board Consideration (ADB only)

Category B Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) [for ADB/DMC, or IEE or EIS (for DMC)] Public Consultation (or if EIS for DMC)

[ ] check if the project is to be deemed environmentally sensitive Environmental Management Plan including a Budget Disclosure 120 days in advance of Board Consideration (ADB only)

Category C (for ADB) or Category C/D (for DMC) Review of Environmental Implications (Note: No requirement for DMC for Category D projects; Project Description and acquisition of Certificate of Non-Coverage for Category C projects)

Appendix 7 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist for Micro Hydropower in Kayu Dujung Village

Country/Project Title: INO/FIP-1/Microhydro

Sector Division: Kayu Dujung

A. Basic Project Design Data

1. Dam height, m = N/A

2. Surface area of reservoir, (ha) = N/A

3. Estimated number of people to be displaced = 0

4. Rated power output, (MW) = 40 KVA

Other Considerations:

1. Water storage type: reservoir √ Run of river

Pumped storage

3. base load Type of power demand to address: √ peak load

Instructions:

I. The project team completes this checklist to support the environmental classification of a

project. It is to be attached to the environmental categorization form and submitted to the

Environment and Safeguards Division (SDES) for endorsement by Director, SDES and for

approval by the Chief Compliance Officer.

II. This checklist focuses on environmental issues and concerns. To ensure that social

dimensions are adequately considered, refer also to ADB's (a) checklists on involuntary

resettlement and Indigenous Peoples; (b) poverty reduction handbook; (c) staff guide to

consultation and participation; and (d) gender checklists.

III. Answer the questions assuming the “without mitigation” case. The purpose is to identify potential impacts. Use the “remarks” section to discuss any anticipated mitigation measures.

√ in-Stream diversion

Appendix 7: REA Checklist for Hydropower

Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist

2.

River diversion scheme:

trans-basin diversion

in-stream Flow

HYDROPOWER


B. Project location Is the dam and/or project facilities adjacent to or within any of the following areas?

Unregulated river √ Undammed river tributaries below the proposed dam √ Unique or aesthetically valuable land or water form

Special area for protecting biodiversity √ Protected area √ Buffer zone of protected area √ Primary forest √ Range of endangered or threatened animals √ Area used by indigenous peoples √ Cultural heritage site √ Wetland √ Mangrove √ Estuary √

C. Potential Environmental Impacts Will the project cause……

Short-term construction impacts such as soil erosion, deterioration of water and air quality, noise and vibration from construction equipment?

√

Disturbance of large areas due to material quarrying? √ Disposal of large quantities of construction spoils? √ Clearing of large forested area for ancillary facilities and access road?

√

Impounding of a long river stretch? √ Dryness (less than 50% of dry season mean flow) over a long downstream river stretch?

√

Construction of permanent access road near or through forests?

√

Creation of barriers for migratory land animals √

Loss of precious ecological values due to flooding of agricultural/forest areas, and wild lands and wildlife habitat; destruction of fish spawning/breeding and nursery grounds?

√

Deterioration of downstream water quality due to anoxic water from the reservoir and sediments due to soil erosion?

√

Significant diversion of water from one basin to another? √ Alternating dry and wet downstream conditions due to peaking operation of powerhouse?

√

Significant modification of annual flood cycle affecting downstream ecosystem, people’s sustenance and livelihoods?

√

Loss or destruction of unique or aesthetically valuable land or water forms?

√

Proliferation of aquatic weeds in reservoir and downstream impairing dam discharge, irrigation systems, navigation and fisheries, and increasing water loss through transpiration?

√

Scouring of river bed below dam? √

Downstream erosion of recipient River in trans-basin diversion?

√


Increased flooding risk of recipient river in trans-basin diversion?

√

Decreased groundwater recharge of downstream areas? √ Draining of downstream wetlands and riparian areas? √ Decline or change in fisheries below the dam due to reduced peak flows and floods, submersion of river stretches and resultant destruction of fish breeding and nursery grounds, and water quality changes?

√

Loss of migratory fish species due to barrier imposed by the dam?

√

Formation of sediment deposits at reservoir entrance, creating backwater effect and flooding and waterlogging upstream?

√

Significant disruption of river sediment transport downstream due to trapping in reservoir?

√

Environmental risk due to potential toxicity of sediments trapped behind the dams?

√

Increased saltwater intrusion in estuary and low lands due to reduced river flows?

√

Significant induced seismicity due to large reservoir size and potential environmental hazard from catastrophic failure of the dam?

√

Cumulative effects due to its role as part of a cascade of dams/ reservoirs?

√

Depletion of dissolved oxygen by large quantities of decaying plant material, fish mortality due to reduced dissolved oxygen content in water, algal blooms causing successive and temporary eutrophication, growth and proliferation of aquatic weeds?

√

Risks and vulnerabilities related to occupational health and safety due to physical, chemical, biological, and radiological hazards during project construction and operation?

√

Large population influx during project construction and operation that causes increased burden on social infrastructure and services (such as water supply and sanitation systems)?

√

Creation of community slums following construction of the hydropower plant and its facilities?

√

Social conflicts if workers from other regions or countries are hired?

√

Uncontrolled human migration into the area, made possible by access roads and transmission lines?

√

Disproportionate impacts on the poor, women, children or other vulnerable groups?

√

Community health and safety risks due to the transport, storage, and use and/or disposal of materials likely to create physical, chemical and biological hazards?

√

Risks to community safety due to both accidental and natural hazards, especially where th