environmental impact of abattoir effluents on surface waters of … · 2018-03-17 · more than 70...
TRANSCRIPT
https://doi.org/10.25240/TJANS.2018.2.2.01
Tropical Journal of Applied Natural Sciences Trop. J. Appl. Nat. Sci., 2(2): 1-9 (2018)
ISSN: 2449-2043
https://doi.org/10.25240/TJANS.2018.2.2.01
Available online: https://tjansonline.com
Environmental Impact of Abattoir Effluents on Surface Waters
of River Idemili
Ibemenuga, K. N.
Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Anambra State, Nigeria.
E-mail: [email protected]; Phone no: +234 812621299
1. INTRODUCTION
Water is a finite resource that is very essential for human
existence, agriculture, industries, etc (Calamari and Naeve,
1994; Aina and Adipe, 1996). It could be described as the
engine of life because water in its varied forms accounts for
more than 70 percent of the entire earth and life forms. Fresh
water has become scarce commodity due to over exploitation
and pollution (Gupta and Shunkle, 2006; Patil and Tijane,
2001; Singh and Mathur, 2005).
Rivers are the most important freshwater resources for man.
Unfortunately, river water in developing areas is increasingly
being polluted by man. Several rivers in urban and semi urban
areas of Nigeria have been polluted with untreated solid
waste and waste waters. This high pollution status threatens
and in many cases, has already altered the ecological balance
of most rivers in Nigeria (Arimoro and Osakwe, 2006;
Zabbey and Hart, 2006; Arimoro and Ikomi, 2008). Untreated
organic effluents from abattoir contaminants flushed into
streams particularly in areas of human activities pollute rivers
and streams.
Mason (1996) reported that the excessive production of
organic matter leads to the buildup of "sludge" and the
mineralization process consumes all dissolved oxygen from
a water column. Organic effluents also frequently contain
large quantities of suspended solids which reduce the light
available to photosynthetic organisms and on setting out,
alter the characteristics of river bed, rendering it an unsuitable
habitat for many organisms (Raheem and Morenikeji, 2008).
This study presents a comprehensive report on the influence
of abattoir wastes on the physico-chemical parameters of
River Idemili.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 Description of the Study Area
River Idemili (Figure 1) is a hydrographic stream in South-
eastern Nigeria. It is located at an elevation of 64 meters
above sea level and its coordinates are 6°7'0"N and 6°46'0"
E. The river lies approximately 7 kilometers south of Onitsha,
along the old Owerri-Onitsha Trunk road. This tropical area
has an average annual rainfall of 2000mm. The river's
tributaries include Idemili stream and close to this river is an
abattoir house located at its bank. Slaughtering of cows
occurs within the slaughter house while roasting of cow
heads, skin and hind limbs with wood and condemned tyres
occur in the open. These activities have darkened the soil
within the roasting area while waste water from washing of
roasted cow parts and abattoir drain into the river. Three
stations were sampled.
ABSTRACT
The physico-chemical parameters of River Idemili that receives effluents from an
abattoir located close to its bank in Umuota Akuora Village, Obosi, Idemili North
Local Government Area of Anambra State Nigeria, was determined using standard
methods. High water temperature (30.030.01 °C), low dissolved oxygen (1.030.04
mg/l), higher levels of BOD (5.530.04 mg/l) and higher levels of hardness
(4.020.03 mg/lCaCO3), nitrate-nitrogen (6.820.03 mg/l), phosphate-phosphorus
(3.130.004 mg/l) and conductivity (52.210.05 scm-1) which were recorded in
station 2 was attributed to discharge of abattoir effluents into the station. Lower levels
of the physico-chemical parameters were, however, recorded in station 3.
Improvement can be achieved by prohibiting the discharge of untreated abattoir
effluents into the river considering the usefulness of this river to the community;
waste water treatment should be applied in order to minimize the influence on water
quality.
Original Research Article
Received: 10th Nov., 2017
Accepted: 18th Jan., 2018
Published: 14rd Mar., 2018
Keywords:
Impact
Abattoir effluents
Surface waters
River Idemili
1
https://doi.org/10.25240/TJANS.2018.2.2.01
Figure 1: Map of the Study Area.
Station 1
This station had a mixture of sandy and loamy soil with
intensive agricultural activities occurring around the river, It
is wide and deep. Light penetrates directly into this station.
There are no canopies of leaves and true aquatic littoral flora
consists of macrophytes growing along the river banks which
include Pennisetum purpereum, Colacasia esculenta and
Elaeis guineensis.
Station 2
The abattoir is located close to this station. It has sandy,
loamy and clayey soil. The soil is mostly oily because of the
slaughtering activities. Human activities in and around this
station include slaughtering of cows, roasting and washing of
cow hides and viscera. Macrophytes in this station include
Bambuseae sp., Heteropogon controtus and Raphia hookeri.
Station 3
This station is located near the bridge across the river that is
along Owerri-Onitsha express road. The soil is sandy and
human activities in and around this station includes
performing of rituals by idol worshippers, washing of
motorcycles, swimming and dumping of refuse. Psidium sp.,
Algae and Heteropogon contortus were among aquatic plants
observed in this station.
2.2 Collection of water samples
Water sample collection was done forth nightly for twelve
months (January to December) between 9am to 10am, using
acidified plastic bottles. Water sample for dissolved oxygen,
which was collected using 500 ml Nessler bottles at about 12
noon. Air and water temperatures were determined in situ by
2 min. immersion of mercury in bulb thermometer.
Transparency was measured using a 25 cm secchi disc. Other
physico-chemical parameters were measured based on
methods described in APHA (1989).
2.3 Data analysis
Data obtained from the study were expressed as mean ± S.D
of triplicate determinations. Differences in means were
compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) at p<0.05.
Where the difference in ANOVA is significant least
significant difference (LSD) was used to separate means.
3. RESULTS
Mean values of physicochemical parameters in the 3 stations
are presented in Figures 2-12.
Air temperature (°C)
Air temperature varied significantly (p<0.05) at the study
stations. The highest mean air temperature value (35.760.01
°C) was recorded in March while the lowest mean value
(25.520.00 °C) was obtained in July (Figure 2). Station 2
with the highest mean air temperature (35.76±0.01°C) is
significantly higher (p<0.05) than station 1 with the lowest
mean value (25.52±0.00 °C) and station 3 (25.90±0.28 °C)
which are not significantly different from each other.
2
https://doi.org/10.25240/TJANS.2018.2.2.01
Figure 2: Mean variation in air temperature (C) in relation to stations of River Idemili.
Water temperature (°C)
Mean water temperature values for the study stations varied
significantly (p<0.05) from 25.150.07 °C at station 1 in July to
30.030.01 °C at station 2 in February (Figure 3) in the three
study stations. Station 2 is significantly higher (p<0.05) than
stations 1 and 3 which are not significantly different from each
other.
Figure 3: Mean variation in water temperature (C) in relation to stations of River Idemili.
pH
The mean pH values of River Idemili did not vary significantly (p>0.05) from 5.000.00 at station 1 in November to 6.760.04 at
station 3 in September in the three stations (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Mean variation in pH in relation to stations of River Idemili.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Air
Te
mp
era
ture
(°C
)Station 1
Station 2
Station 3
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Wat
er
Tem
pe
ratu
re (
°C)
Station 1
Station 2
Station 3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
pH
Station 1
Station 2
Station 3
3
https://doi.org/10.25240/TJANS.2018.2.2.01
Turbidity (NTU)
Turbidity varied during the study. The minimum value
(12.020.02 NTU), station 1 and maximum value
(53.000.00 NTU), station 3 were respectively obtained in
November and May (Figure 5). One-way analysis of variance
revealed that the mean turbidity values in the three stations
were significantly different (p<0.05). Station 3 is
significantly lower (p<0.05) than stations 1 and 2 which are
not significantly dissimilar.
Figure 5: Mean variation in turbidity (NTU) in relation to stations of River Idemili.
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)
Figure 6 revealed that the maximum mean value of dissolved
oxygen was recorded in station 1 (5.48±0.02 mg/l). This was
followed by station 3 (5.45±0.00 mg.l). The minimum mean
value of dissolved oxygen was recorded in station 2
(1.03±0.04 mg/l). Station 2 is significantly lower (p<0.05)
than stations 2 and 3 which are not significantly different
from each other. The values of dissolved oxygen in the
stations ranged from 1.03±0.00 mg/l (Station 2) in January to
5.48±0.00 mg/l (station 1) in July.
Figure 6: Mean variation in dissolved oxygen (mg/l) in relation to stations of River Idemili.
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) (mg/l)
Station 1 had the lowest biochemical oxygen demand mean
value (1.020.69 mg/l) in March (Figure 7). The highest
mean value (5.530.04 mg/l) was recorded in May. Station 2
with the highest mean value (5.53±0.04 mg/l) is significantly
higher (p<0.05) than stations 1 and 3 which do not differ
significantly.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60Tu
rbid
ity
(NTU
)
Station 1
Station 2
Station 3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Dis
solv
ed
oxy
gen
(m
g/l)
Station 1
Station 2
Station 3
4
https://doi.org/10.25240/TJANS.2018.2.2.01
Figure 7: Mean variation in biochemical oxygen demand (mg/l) in relation to stations of River Idemili.
Alkalinity (mg/l CaCO3)
The mean values of alkalinity which ranged from 0.210.01 mg/l at station 1 and 4.220.03 mg/l at station 2 were both obtained
in June (Figure 8). Analysis of variance result showed a significant difference (p<0.05) in alkalinity at the three stations. Station
2 is significantly higher (p<0.05) than stations 1 and 3 which are not significantly different from each other.
Figure 8: Mean variation in alkalinity (mg/l CaCO3) in relation to stations of River Idemili.
Hardness (mg/lCaCO3)
There was wide variation in mean values of hardness
recorded during the study. Station 1 had the lowest mean
value of 0.520.03 mg/l while station 2 had the highest mean
hardness concentration (4.020.03 mg/l) (Figure 9). Station
2 is significantly higher (p<0.05) than stations 1 and 3 which
did not differ significantly from each other. Hardness mean
values in the months varied between 0.52±0.03 mg/l in April
(station 1) and 4.02±0.03 mg/l in July (station 2).
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Bio
che
mic
al o
xyge
n d
em
and
(m
g/l)
Station 1
Station 2
Station 3
00.5
11.5
22.5
33.5
44.5
Alk
alin
ity
(mg/
l CaC
O3)
Station 1
Station 2
Station 3
5
https://doi.org/10.25240/TJANS.2018.2.2.01
Figures 9: Mean variation in hardness (mg/l CaCO3) in relation to stations of River Idemili.
Nitrate-nitrogen concentration (mg/l)
The mean concentration of nitrate-nitrogen recorded for the
three stations ranged from 3.520.03 mg/l at station 1 to
6.820.03 mg/l at station 2 (Figure 10). Station 2 with highest
mean value (6.82±1.03 mg/l) was significantly higher
(p<0.05) than stations 1 and 3. The highest mean
concentration value (6.82±1.03 mg/l (station 2) and the
lowest mean value (3.52±0.03 mg/l, station 1) of nitrate-
nitrogen were recorded in September and January
respectively.
Figure 10: Mean variation in nitrate-nitrogen (mg/l) concentration in relation to stations of River Idemili.
Phosphate-phosphorus concentration (mg/l)
Figure 11 showed that the range of mean phosphate-
phosphorus values recorded during the study was 0.020.01
mg/l at station 1 in April and May, and 3.130.04 mg/l at
station 2 in July. The mean concentrations of phosphate-
phosphorus at station 2 is significantly higher (p<0.05) than
that of stations 1 and 3 which are not significantly different
form each other.
Figure 11: Mean variation in phosphate-phosphorous (mg/l) in relation to stations of River Idemili.
00.5
11.5
22.5
33.5
44.5
Har
dn
ess
(m
g/l C
aCO
3)
Station 1
Station 2
Station 3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Nit
rate
-nit
roge
n c
on
cen
trat
ion
(m
g/l)
Station 1
Station 2
Station 3
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
ph
osp
hat
e p
ho
sph
oro
us
(m
g/l)
Station 1
Station 2
Station 3
6
https://doi.org/10.25240/TJANS.2018.2.2.01
Conductivity (μscm-1)
The lowest mean value for conductivity was recorded at
station 1 (31.020.01 mg/l) in January (Figure 12) while the
highest mean value of 52.210.05 scm-1 was recorded at
station 2 in October. The mean conductivity values at the
three stations are not significantly different (p>0.05).
Figure 12: Mean variation in conductivity (μscm-1) in relation to stations of River Idemili.
4. DISCUSSION
The mean air and water temperature range recorded from
River Idemili are typical of tropical rivers. Water temperature
falls within the surface water stipulated range of 25-30 °C for
aquatic organisms (WHO, 1984). The maximum water
temperature obtained in station 2 can be attributed to abattoir
effluent discharge from the abattoir located around this
station. Temperature rise depends on the amount of heat
discharge, the mode of release, the properties and quantity of
receiving waters, climate and weather (Haslam, 1990;
Reheem and Morenikeji, 2008). An increase in temperature
will lead to an increase in the rate of chemical reactions and
formation of dangerous complexes. It also shortens the life
cycles of some invertebrates in a river below a heated
discharge (Raheem and Morenikeji, 2008).
pH measures the acidity or basic nature of solution
(Chapman, 1996). The maximum pH in station 3 may be due
to the photosynthetic activities of algal and plant growth in
this station. pH is a vital environmental characteristic that
decides the physiological, metabolic survival, and growth of
aquatic organisms (Ramanathan et al., 2005). The mean pH
recorded indicates that River Idemili was slightly acidic.
Normal biological activity is restricted to 6-8, for natural
water (Adakole and Anunne, 2003; Adakole, et al., 2008). pH
varied slightly at the study stations with an approximate mean
range of 6.80.04 to 5.00+0.00. This is in consonance with
the observation of Wetzel (1975) that, low pH are found in
natural water rich in dissolved organic matter. The low
variability of pH value could be as a result of abattoir wastes
not having significant effect on the pH of the River. Hynes
(1975) has attributed low variability to streams being
resistant to pH changes to chemical buffering effects.
Although definitive, pH range of the aquatic systems is an
important indicator of the water quality and the extent of
pollution in watershed area (Adakole, 2007). Ibemenuga and
Inyang (2007) recommended a pH range of 6.5-9.5 as suitable
for aquatic life.
Turbidity was highest in station 3 as a result of excessive
algal growth, riparian vegetation, in addition to the abattoir
effluent transported downstream from station 2. Turbidity
measures the clarity or cloudiness of water. The more
suspended solids in the water the murkier it seems and the
higher the turbidity (Rao, 1993). High turbidity will reduce
primary production and also oxygen levels in pond which will
increase the susceptibility of fish to fungal diseases (Boyd,
1979).
Dissolved oxygen is an important gas, necessary for
respiration of aquatic biota hence Adeniji (1986) described it
as one of the most important substances which aquatic
organisms cannot survive without. Dissolved oxygen is a
relative measure of the amount of oxygen that is dissolved or
carried in a given medium (Chiya and Izumi, 1995). The
minimum concentration of dissolved oxygen in fresh water
necessary for aquatic fauna to live in is about 5 mg/litre
(Odiete, 1999). Dissolved oxygen mean value obtained for
the three stations ranged from 1.030.04 mg/l in station 2 to
5.480.2 mg/l in station 1. These values were lower than the
value Offem et al. (2011) reported for Calabar River, and the
WHO (2004) limit of 6.0 mg/l. The low dissolved oxygen
recorded during the study could be attributed to high organic
pollution. BOD which measures organic pollution of aquatic
bodies was maximum in station 2. This could be due to
abattoir effluents containing large amounts of organic waste
which was as a result of the abattoir located here.
Low alkalinity values were recorded in the three stations.
ANOVA revealed significant difference (p<0.05) in the mean
concentrations of alkalinity in the three stations.
The mean hardness values for the stations which ranged from
0.520.03 mg/l CaCO3 in station 2 falls within the
classification of soft water. This probably was due to inflow
of rain water which neutralizes the chemical composition of
the abattoir effluent within the river. The maximum mean
value of hardness recorded in station 2 could be due to
concentration effect from entry of organic effluents and
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
con
du
ctiv
ity
(μsc
m-1
)
Station 1
Station 2
Station 3
7
https://doi.org/10.25240/TJANS.2018.2.2.01
evaporation due to high temperature based on the hardness
classification of water; soft (0-55 mg/lCaCO3), slightly hard
(56-100 mg/lCaCO3), moderately hard (101-200 mg/lCaCO3
and 201-500 mg/lCaCO3 as modified from Outreach
Department (OD) of natural Water Resources Institute
Kaduna (1997).
Nitrate-nitrogen is among the common nitrogen compounds
occurring in dissolved particulate and gaseous forms. Nitrate-
nitrogen is soluble and easily absorbed by aquatic biota.
Generally, the mean value (4.570.9 mg/l) of nitrate
concentration in River Idemili was lower than the WHO
(2004) limits of 10 mg/l for rivers and streams. Odiete (1999)
noted that a characteristic feature of most tropical waters is
low rate which results in rapid utilization of nutrients. The
low level of nitrate- nitrogen also indicates the good health
status and self-purification capacity of the river despite the
discharge of abattoir waste into it as excessive concentrations
of nutrients can over stimulate aquatic plant and algal growth
and cause oxygen depletion and eutrophication which may
deprive fish and invertebrates of available oxygen in the
water (Agwa et al., 2013).
Phosphate-phosphorus is among nutrient determinants of
phytoplankton productivity and hence fish production
(Welcome, 1978; Boyd and Lichtkoppler, 1979; Wetzel and
Likens, 1978; King, 1998). The concentration of phosphate-
phosphorous above 0.5 mg/l was an indication of pollution
(Agarwal, 1991; Raheem and Morenikeji, 2008). This
indicates that station 1 with the maximum mean phosphate-
phosphorous concentration (1.60.75 mg/l) is polluted. This
station is mostly polluted compared with station 1 (0.250.19
mg/l) upstream and station 3 (0.420.23 mg/l) downstream.
Electrical conductivity in natural waters depends on the
geology, land use, flow, runoff, ground water inflows’
temperature, evaporation and dilution. The higher mean
value 45.710.01 uscm-1 recorded in station 2 may be
attributed to concentration effect of the water due to abattoir
effluent discharged through this point into the river.
Conductivity of freshwater ranged from 10-1000 μscm-1 but
may exceed 1000 μscm-1 (Asuquo, 1999; Offem et al., 2011).
The mean value of conductivity recorded for the three
stations is within the range for fresh water.
5. CONCLUSION
The result of this study revealed that the abattoir effluents
discharged into River Idemili impacted negatively on the
physical and chemical characteristics of the river. Since water
quality attributes are prime factors that influence the survival
of aquatic life, there is need to treat abattoir effluents before
discharge into the river.
REFERENCES
Adakole, J.A. (2007). Bacteriological quality of an urban stream in
Northern Nigeria. Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 22(1):1-10.
Adakole, J.A. and Anunna, P.A. (2003). Benthic macro
invertebrates as indicators of Environmental quality of an urban
stream, Zaria, Nigeria. Journal of Aquatic Sciences,18(2):85-92.
Adakole, J.A., Abulode, D.S. and Balarabe, M.I. (2008).
Assessment of Water Quality of a Man-Made Lake in Zaria, Nigeria
(Sengupta, M. and Dalwani, R. eds.). Proceedings of Taal 2007: The
12th World Lake Conference, 1373-1382.
Adeniji, H.A. (1986). Some Limnological precautions for fish
farmers. Fisheries enterprises and information Brochure in
commemoration of the 5th annual conference of the Fisheries
Society of Nigeria (FISON) Set. 22nd - 25th, 54-56.
Agarwal, S.K. (1991). Pollution Ecology, Humanshu Publications
Udaipur.
Agwa, O.K., Sito, E. and Ogugbue, C.J. (2013). A Spatial
Assessment of the Microbiological and Physicochemical Quality of
a Stream Receiving Raw Abattoir Waste. Middle-East Journal of
Scientific Research, 14(7):879-886.
Aina, E.G. and Adipe, N.O. (eds) (1996). Water quality monitoring
and environmental status in Nigeria. FEPA monography 6, Abuja,
Nigeria. Pp. 239.
APHA, (1989). Standard Methods for the examination of water and
waste waters. 18th edition, American Public Health Association
Washington D.C. 1134pp.
Arimoro, F.O. and Osakwe, E,l. (2006). Influence of sawmill wood
wastes on the distribution and population of macro benthic
invertebrates in Benin River at Sapele, Niger Delta, Nigeria.
Chemistry and Biodiversity, 3:578-592.
Arimoro, P.O. and Ikoni, R.B. (2008). Response of macro
invertebrates to abattoir waste and other anthropogenic activities in
municipal stream in Niger Delta, Nigeria. Environmentalist, 28:85-
98.
Asuquo, F.E. (1999). Physico-chemical characteristics and
anthropogenic pothition of the surface waters of Calabar River,
Nigeria. Global Journal of pure and Applied Science,5(4);595-600.
Boyd, C.E. (1979). Water quality in warm water fish pond. Craft
masters printers, INC. Opelika Alabama.
Boyd, C.E. and Lichkoppler, F. (1979). Water quality management
in pond fish culture. Int. Center for Aquaculture, Agricultural
experiment station, Auburn Univ, research and Development. Series
No. 22 Project AID/DSANG0039, 30PP.
Calamari, D. and Naeve, H. (eds.) (1994). Review of pollution in the
African aquatic environment. CIFA Technical Paper No, 25 FAO,
Rome, 118pp.
Chapman, D. (1996). Water Quality Assessment – A guide to use of
biota sediments and water environmental monitoring. 2nd edition
EPFN. Spon, London. 66pp.
Chiya, N. and Izumi, N. (1995). "XAFS studies of some
precipitation and colouration reaction used in analytical chemistry".
Physical condensed matter, 208-209: 387-388.
Guputa, G.K. and Shunkle, R. (2006). Physico-chemical and
bacteriological quality in various sources of drinking water from
Auriya District (UP) Industrial Area, Pollution Research,
23(4):205-209.
Haslam, S.M. (1990). River Pollution: an Ecological Perspective.
Behaven Press, p.253.
8
https://doi.org/10.25240/TJANS.2018.2.2.01
Hynes, B.N, (1975). The stream and its valley: Edgardo Baldi
Memorial Lecture. Verhandlungen International Vereinigung der
Limnologie, 19: 1-5.
Ibemenuga, K.N. and Inyang, N.M. (2007). Physico-chemical
characteristics of tropical stream in Nigeria. Journal of Biological
Research and Biotechnology, 2: 275-281.
King, R.P. (1998). Physico-chemical indices of the fisheries
potential of Nigeria rainforest pond. Journal of Aquatic Sciences,
13: 49-54.
Mason, C.F. (1996). Biology of freshwater pollution. 3rd edition.
Longman Group Limited, UK, 258pp.
Odiete, W.O. (1999). Environmental physiology, Animals and
Pollution. Diversities Publ. Limited, Lagos. 261pp.
Offem, B.O., Ayotunde, F.Q., Ikpe, G.U., Ochang, S.N. and Ada,
F.B. (2011). Influence of seasons on water quality, Abundance of
fish and plankton species of Ikwori Lake, South-Eastern Nigeria.
Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal, 2011: Faj-13
http//astonjournals.com/faj.
Outreach Department (OD) National Water Resources Institute-
Kaduna (1997). Water Quality Testing and Control. 115pp.
Patil, D.R. and Tijane, R.V. (2001). Investigation of suspected
carcinogen Cr (iv) and its control. Journal of J.ld. Pollution Control
course,18(l): 43-47
Raheem, N.K. and Morenikeji, O.A. (2008). Impact of abattoir
effluents on surface waters of the Alanuyo Stream in Ibadan.
Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 12(l):
73-77.
Rao, K.S. (1993). Practical Ecology-1st edition school of studies in
Zoology. Vikram University. Pp. 16-17.
Remanathan, N., Padmavatly, P., Francis, T., Athithian, S. and
Selvaranjitham (2005). Manual on polyculture of tier shrimp and
carps in firewater. Tmail Nadu vertermany and animal sciences
University, Fisheries college and research Thothukudi. Pp. 1-161.
Singh, R.P. and Mathur, P. (2005). Investigation of variation in
phsico-chemical characteristics of a freshwater reservoir of Aginer
City, Rajasthan; Indian Journal of Environmental Science, 9(1): 57-
61.
Welcome, R.L. (1978). Some factors affecting the catch of tropical
river fisheries. Welcome, R.L. (ed). In: Africa, Boujumbra, Burundi,
21-23 November, 1977. Review and experience papers. CIFA Tech.
Pap/Doc/Tech. CPCA., 5:266-275.
Wetzel, R.G and Likens, G.E. (1978). Limnological analysis.
W.B. Saunders Company, USA, 375pp.
Wetzel, R.G. (1975). Limnology. Saunders college publications,
New York. 222pp
WHO (World Health Organization) (1984). Guidelines for Drinking
Water Quality. Volume 2. Health Criteria and other supporting
information, Geneva. 335pp.
WHO (World Health Organization) (2004). Guidelines for Drinking
Water Quality. 3rd ed., Recommendation, Geneva 515pp.
Zabbey, N. and Hart, A.I. (2006). Influence of some physico-
chemical parameters on the composition and distribution of benthic
fauna in Woji creek, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Global Journal of Pure
and Applied Sciences, 12(l): l-5.
How to cite this article
Ibemenuga, K. N. (2018). Environmental Impact of Abattoir Effluents on Surface Waters of River Idemili. Tropical Journal of Applied
Natural Sciences, 2(2): 1-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.25240/TJANS.2018.2.2.01.
Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
.
9