environmental contaminants encyclopedia ?· environmental contaminants encyclopedia mineral...
Post on 30-Jun-2018
Embed Size (px)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINANTS ENCYCLOPEDIA
MINERAL SPIRITS ENTRY
July 1, 1997
ROY J. IRWIN, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
WITH ASSISTANCE FROM COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
STUDENT ASSISTANT CONTAMINANTS SPECIALISTS:
MARK VAN MOUWERIK
MARION DUBLER SEESE
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
WATER RESOURCES DIVISIONS, WATER OPERATIONS BRANCH
1201 Oakridge Drive, Suite 250
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525
Where specific products, books, or laboratories arementioned, no official U.S. government endorsement isintended or implied.
Digital format users: No software was independentlydeveloped for this project. Technical questions relatedto software should be directed to the manufacturer ofwhatever software is being used to read the files. AdobeAcrobat PDF files are supplied to allow use of thisproduct with a wide variety of software, hardware, andoperating systems (DOS, Windows, MAC, and UNIX).
This document was put together by human beings, mostly bycompiling or summarizing what other human beings havewritten. Therefore, it most likely contains somemistakes and/or potential misinterpretations and shouldbe used primarily as a way to search quickly for basicinformation and information sources. It should not beviewed as an exhaustive, "last-word" source for criticalapplications (such as those requiring legally defensibleinformation). For critical applications (such aslitigation applications), it is best to use this documentto find sources, and then to obtain the originaldocuments and/or talk to the authors before depending tooheavily on a particular piece of information.
Like a library or many large databases (such as EPA'snational STORET water quality database), this documentcontains information of variable quality from verydiverse sources. In compiling this document, mistakeswere found in peer reviewed journal articles, as well asin databases with relatively elaborate quality controlmechanisms [366,649,940]. A few of these were caughtand marked with a "[sic]" notation, but undoubtedlyothers slipped through. The [sic] notation was insertedby the editors to indicate information or spelling thatseemed wrong or misleading, but which was neverthelesscited verbatim rather than arbitrarily changing what theauthor said.
Most likely additional transcription errors and typoshave been added in some of our efforts. Furthermore,with such complex subject matter, it is not always easyto determine what is correct and what is incorrect,especially with the "experts" often disagreeing. It isnot uncommon in scientific research for two differentresearchers to come up with different results which leadthem to different conclusions. In compiling theEncyclopedia, the editors did not try to resolve suchconflicts, but rather simply reported it all.
It should be kept in mind that data comparability is amajor problem in environmental toxicology sincelaboratory and field methods are constantly changing andsince there are so many different "standard methods"published by EPA, other federal agencies, state agencies,and various private groups. What some laboratory andfield investigators actually do for standard operatingpractice is often a unique combination of variousstandard protocols and impromptu "improvements." Infact, the interagency task force on water methodsconcluded that :
It is the exception rather than the rule thatwater-quality monitoring data from differentprograms or time periods can be compared on ascientifically sound basis, and that...
No nationally accepted standard definitions existfor water quality parameters. The differentorganizations may collect data using identical orstandard methods, but identify them by differentnames, or use the same names for data collected bydifferent methods .
Differences in field and laboratory methods are alsomajor issues related to (the lack of) data comparabilityfrom media other than water: soil, sediments, tissues,and air.
In spite of numerous problems and complexities, knowledgeis often power in decisions related to chemicalcontamination. It is therefore often helpful to be awareof a broad universe of conflicting results or conflictingexpert opinions rather than having a portion of thisinformation arbitrarily censored by someone else.Frequently one wants to know of the existence ofinformation, even if one later decides not to use it fora particular application. Many would like to see a highpercentage of the information available and decide forthemselves what to throw out, partly because they don'twant to seem uniformed or be caught by surprise bypotentially important information. They are in a betterposition if they can say: "I knew about that data,assessed it based on the following quality assurancecriteria, and decided not to use it for thisapplication." This is especially true for users near theend of long decision processes, such as hazardous sitecleanups, lengthy ecological risk assessments, or complexnatural resource damage assessments.
For some categories, the editors found no information andinserted the phrase "no information found." This doesnot necessarily mean that no information exists; it
simply means that during our efforts, the editors foundnone. For many topics, there is probably information"out there" that is not in the Encyclopedia. The moretime that passes without encyclopedia updates (none areplanned at the moment), the more true this statement willbecome. Still, the Encyclopedia is unique in that itcontains broad ecotoxicology information from moresources than many other reference documents. No updatesof this document are currently planned. However, it ishoped that most of the information in the encyclopediawill be useful for some time to come even withoutupdates, just as one can still find information in the1972 EPA Blue Book  that does not seem wellsummarized anywhere else.
Although the editors of this document have done theirbest in the limited time available to insure accuracy ofquotes or summaries as being "what the original authorsaid," the proposed interagency funding of a biggerproject with more elaborate peer review and qualitycontrol steps never materialized.
The bottom line: The editors hope users find thisdocument useful, but don't expect or depend onperfection herein. Neither the U.S. Government northe National Park Service make any claims that thisdocument is free of mistakes.
The following is one chemical topic entry (one file among118). Before utilizing this entry, the reader isstrongly encouraged to read the README file (in thissubdirectory) for an introduction, an explanation of howto use this document in general, an explanation of how tosearch for power key section headings, an explanation ofthe organization of each entry, an information qualitydiscussion, a discussion of copyright issues, and alisting of other entries (other topics) covered.
See the separate file entitled REFERENC for the identityof numbered references in brackets.
HOW TO CITE THIS DOCUMENT: As mentioned above, forcritical applications it is better to obtain and cite theoriginal publication after first verifying various dataquality assurance concerns. For more routineapplications, this document may be cited as:
Irwin, R.J., M. VanMouwerik, L. Stevens, M.D.Seese, and W. Basham. 1997. EnvironmentalContaminants Encyclopedia. National Park Service,Water Resources Division, Fort Collins, Colorado.Distributed within the Federal Government as anElectronic Document (Projected public availability
on the internet or NTIS: 1998).
Mineral Spirits (Mineral Oil Spirits, CAS number 64475-85-0)
Br.Class: General Introduction and Classification Information:
Mineral spirits is derived from the light distillatefractions during the crude oil refining process and arecomposed of the C6-C11 compounds, with the majority ofthe relative mass composed of C9-C11 . Mineralspirits have been recommended as a substitute for puregum turpentine . Pure gum turpentine is a goodthinner or diluent for oil colors, but mineral spirits isan excellent substitute .
There are many different substances referred to as"mineral spirits," with many different CAS numbers[617,620]. Thus, when considering mineral spirits, it isfirst necessary to determine "which one." This entrycovers only mineral oil Spirits, CAS number 64475-85-0.
According to the U.S. Coast Guard Emergency ResponseNotification System (ERNS), mineral spirits is one of themost commonly spilled petroleum products in the U.S.. However, it is not clear exactly which mineralspirits are being frequently spilled, and there may beseveral substances called either mineral spirits ormineral oils at a spill site (see Mineral Oils entry).
For example. at a hardware store, several cans withmineral spirits as the primary label gave no CAS number,but one can with mineral spirits on the label gave theingredients as CAS 8052-41-3 (Roy Irwin, personalcommunication, 1996). CAS 8052-41-3 is actually assignedto Stoddard solvent. Stoddard solvent is one particularkind of mineral spirits . Stoddard solvent is notcovered by this entry. The Agency for Toxic Substancesand Disease Registry (ATSDR) published a toxicologicalprofile for stoddard solvent in 1995, and that documentshould be consulted for information on Stoddard solvent,a particular kind of mineral spirits .
Br.Haz: General Hazard/Toxicity Summary:
Mineral spirits products are fairly volatile , andcontain a fairly high percentage of aromatics [560,747].Therefore, acute and chronic toxicity from the aromaticsis the greatest toxicological concern.