environmental and social monitoring report to zero incident ... sub-paragraph (a) ... line at the...

Environmental and Social Monitoring Report

This report has been submitted to ADB by BP Berau Limited and is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s public communications policy (2005). It does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB.

Project Number: 38919 April – October 2011

INDONESIA: Tangguh Liquefied Natural Gas Project Operator’s Environmental, Health and Safety Report

Prepared by BP Berau Limited Tangguh LNG Project Operator

Operator’s Environmental, Health and Safety Report Tangguh LNG Project

April – October 2011

Environmental Health and Safety Report Tangguh LNG Project April - October 2011

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND HEALTH SAFETY REPORT

TANGGUH LNG PROJECT

TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................ 1 Table List....................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 3 1. Regulatory Compliance ....................................................................................... 4

1.1. Summary Description ................................................................................. 4 1.2. Implications for Tangguh ............................................................................ 4

2. Environmental Management Plan...................................................................... 4 2.1. LNG Plant and its Supporting Facilities including Marine Facilities........ 4

2.1.1. Wastewater Management.............................................................. 5 2.1.2. Solid Waste Management .............................................................. 7 2.1.3. Revegetation.................................................................................. 10 2.1.4. Air Emission ................................................................................... 11 2.1.5. Water Management ...................................................................... 11 2.1.6. Hydrocarbon and Chemical Storage and Handling ..................... 11

2.2. Gas Production Facilities and Gas Transmission (GPF) ......................... 12 2.3. Drilling Activities........................................................................................ 12 2.4. Environmental Management System ..................................................... 12

3. Environmental Monitoring Plan ........................................................................ 13 3.1. LNG Plant and its Supporting Facilities including Marine Facilities .............. 13

3.1.1. Wastewater Monitoring................................................................ 13 3.1.2. Solid Waste Monitoring ................................................................ 18 3.1.3. Revegetation.................................................................................. 20 3.1.4. Air Emission ................................................................................... 20 3.1.5. Hydrocarbon and Chemical Storage and Handling ..................... 21

3.2. Gas Production Facilities and Gas Transmission (GPF) ......................... 22 3.3. Drilling Activities........................................................................................ 22

4. Environmental Studies ...................................................................................... 22 5. Health and Safety .............................................................................................. 22 6. External Panel Annual Review and Status of Non Compliances................... 26 7. Additional Information ....................................................................................... 26 8. Evaluation Results ............................................................................................. 27


2

Figure List Figure 1. LNG Plant ............................................................................................. 5 Figure 2. Progress of Produced Water Treatment Plant Construction Project..... 6 Figure 3. Plastic Granulator and Can Compactor ................................................. 8 Figure 4. Wood Chipper....................................................................................... 8 Figure 5. Organic Waste Landfill.......................................................................... 9 Figure 6. Organic Waste Composter ................................................................... 9 Figure 7. Maintenance of Revegetated Area ..................................................... 10 Figure 8. Flaring during Operation Period .......................................................... 11 Figure 9. Wastewater Quality from STP Step 3 Camp Zone A .......................... 14 Figure 10. Wastewater Quality from STP Step 3 Camp Zone C .......................... 14 Figure 11. Wastewater Quality from STP Utility .................................................. 15 Figure 12. Produced Water Quality...................................................................... 16 Figure 13. Desalination Unit Brine Water Quality ................................................ 17 Figure 14. Neutralising Pit Wastewater Quality................................................... 18 Figure 15. Food Waste Profile ............................................................................. 19 Figure 16. Solid Non-Hazardous Waste Profile .................................................... 19 Figure 17. Oil Spill Drill – Oil Boom Deployment ................................................. 22 Figure 18. Industrial Hygine Activities ................................................................. 25

Table List

Table 1. Wastewater Type and Flow Rate ......................................................... 5 Table 2 Ambient Air Sampling LNG Tangguh (July 2011)............................... 20 Table 3 Result of Emission Sampling on AGI (July 2011)................................ 20 Table 4 Result of Emission Sampling on Boiler (July 2011)............................. 21 Table 5 Result of Gas Turbine Emission Sampling (July 2011)........................ 21 Table 6 Result of Flaring Sampling (July 2011)............................................... 21 Table 7 Result of Generator Set Emission Sampling....................................... 21 Table 8. Key Indicators on Safety Performance................................................ 23


3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Tangguh is now fully in operation. During period of May 2011 – October 2011, Tangguh has delivered 49 LNG cargoes and 12 condensate cargoes to the customer. The environmental management and monitoring programmes continue to be implemented in line with the approved AMDAL and relevant permits granted for Tangguh as well as the Environmental Management System ISO 14001:2004 to maintain the certification that was obtained in December 2010. The construction of produced water treatment plant is progressing at 90% completion by end October 2011. The produced water treatment plant is scheduled to complete and in operation by end of 2011. Tangguh issued the AMDAL Implementation report for the period of April–October 2011 on 25 October 2011 to the Minister of Environment (MOE) and related government institutions including the local Government of Teluk Bintuni, Ditjen MIGAS and BPMIGAS. This report is developed mainly based on the AMDAL Implementation report. Tangguh maintains focus strongly on all aspects of HSE. Journey to Zero Incident campaign series has been started in 2011 early, the first round focused on PPE compliance campaign and marine safety campaign on the second round. One Recordable Injury (RI) happened in May when a medical treatment given to worker of Asphalt Mixing Plant after his right hand finger tip caught between gear guard support and crowbar. Another RI case took place in June when a cook splashed by hot oil cooking while cooking. All have been thoroughly investigated and lessons learned have been circulated internally. Safety performance in the second half of 2011 was excellent, with zero recordable injuries up to October. It is expected to maintain zero recordable injury up to the year end to ensure achieving the targeted RIF of 0.11.


4

1. Regulatory Compliance 1.1. Summary Description As a follow up to the issuance of the new Law no 32 year 2009 regarding the Environmental Protection and Management, Government of Indonesia (GoI) is currently developing related implementation regulations including AMDAL and Environmental Permitting regulations, and these are expected to be issued before end of this year. During the period of April-October 2011, there is no new/update regulation related to environment applicable or specific for Oil & Gas industry issued by government. The latest one was Ministry of Environment Decree no 19 year 2010 regarding Wastewater Discharge Standard for Oil, Gas and Thermal Industry to replace the Decree no 4 year 2007 on the same subject, which was already included in the previous report. 1.2. Implications for Tangguh The new Law no 32 year 2009 is stricter in term of pollution definition and consequence for non-compliance. Tangguh maintains its commitment to comply with the applicable regulatory requirements in Indonesia. 2. Environmental Management Plan This six-monthly report covers the period of April–October 2011 which is consistent with Tangguh AMDAL reporting period to the Indonesian Ministry of Environment. This report has been prepared to fulfil the Borrowers’ obligations under: Section 1.12 (Certain Environmental, Involuntary Resettlement and Indigenous Peoples Matters), Paragraph (B) (Regular Reports), sub-paragraph (a)(Environmental and Health and Safety Report) of the ADB Tranche PSC Parties Agreement dated as of 31 July 2006 and Section 1.18 (Certain Environmental, Involuntary Resettlement and Indigenous Peoples Matters), Paragraph (B) (Regular Reports), sub-paragraph (a) (Environmental and Health and Safety Report) of the Japanese Tranche PSC Parties Agreement" dated as of 31 July 2006. Tangguh LNG environmental, health and safety management and monitoring activities during the 6 month period from April–October 2011 is described in below sections. 2.1. LNG Plant and its Supporting Facilities including Marine Facilities Tangguh is now fully in operation. During period of May 2011 – October 2011, Tangguh has delivered 49 LNG cargoes and 12 condensate cargoes to the customer. The average personnel on board during the reporting period are about 2900. In September 2011, total 2919 personnel on board accommodated at the dormitory A and B, Shorebase camp and Step 3 camp. The number of POB reduced to about 2000 people at the end of October due to managed POB number, including the demobilisation of TAR team and the early stage demobilisation of Wastewater Treatment Plant Project (WWTP) and additional manning from Minor Civil Work Project.


5

Figure 1. LNG Plant

2.1.1. Wastewater Management Wastewater generated from the site activities consists of sewage from camps and dormitories, brine water reject from the Reverse Osmosis (RO-desalination) and desalination units, and waste water from plant operation (chemically contaminated water, oily water and produced water). In line with the approved AMDAL and the Minister of Environment Permit No 222 of 2008. The treated wastewater from the five streams is discharged through -13 m LAT discharge point.

Table 1. Wastewater Type and Flow Rate

Wastewater Maximum Flow (m3/day)

Average Flow (m3/day)

Sewage – Utility 504* 150 Brine Water – Desal Unit 11544* 1003 Produced Water 1992* 582 Oily Contaminated Water 2400* *** Chemically Contaminated Water 3600* 1342 Sewage – Step 3 Camp 2000** 764 Brine Water – RO Unit 5904** 2585

* MoE Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 222/2008 ** MoE Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 562/2007 *** CPI effluent is routed to produced water system due to COD content, so there is no discharge for oily contaminated water Sewage Sewage from dormitory A and B as well as from Admin building and Main Control Building is processed in the permanent STP, while two STPs in Step 3 (Zone A and Zone C) treat sewage from Step 3 Camps and other related buildings. One STP (Zone B) has been dedicated solely to treat produced water from plant since January 2010. The treated waste water from both constructions STP and permanent STP is discharged to -13m LAT outfall line at the LNG jetty. While partially (approximately 20%) ex-construction STP


6

effluent has to be discharged to the outfall of jetty construction due to narrowing of the sewage pipe that caused by sedimentation and clogging by the growth of shellfish. Modification to resolve this issue has been done which includes separating RO and STP line at the BOG area and installing air vent to release air trap. This modification has reduced significant volume of wastewater to the construction jetty however overflow still occuring in the ventline. Further actions are to be executed covering separating RO and STP manifold at the end of horizontal discharge line and fabricating as well as separating vertical pipe of -13 m LAT line. The construction of the pipeline work will be completed in the end of December 2011. Notification letter to the Ministry of Environment has been submitted. Medium-term solution is to replace 200 m long PVC with HDPE line and to close the vent line at the LNG tank. For long term solution, detail inspection for repair and replacement of the RO and STP line will be performed through Mechanical and Electrical Stinkul Project. Brine water Desalination facility processes sea water as raw water into desalinated water. This desalinated water then is processed into dematerialized water and re-mineralized water. Dematerialized water is utilized for process plant supply and re-mineralized water is utilized for domestic supply at dormitory and offices complex (administration building, central building, warehouse, fire station and workshop). Reverse Osmosis (RO) unit product is utilized for the consumption of step 3 camp. Average volume of brine water generated from desalination unit is 1003 m3/day and 2585 m3/day for RO unit. The brine reject is discharged to the common outfall at -13 m LAT. Produced water In this reporting period, produced water has been implemented and managed as per the dispensation letter approved by MOE under the Mekanisme Pembinaan Penaatan PROPER - PROPER Compliance Assistance Mechanism (MP3), Ministry of Environment Letter No B-7088/MENLH/09/2010 dated 22 September 2010. Average volume of treated produced water generated from WWTP zone B at Step 3 camp is approximately 600 m3/day. The construction of produced water treatment plant have been completed by end October 2011. Current focus is the commissioning and start up of the plant. The produced water treatment plant is scheduled to complete and fully operated by end of 2011.

Figure 2. Progress of Produced Water Treatment Plant Construction Project

Progress of this program is reported quarterly to relevant government institutions.


7

Oily contaminated wastewater The oily contaminated wastewater is treated in the CPI (Corrugated Plate Interceptor) to remove hydrocarbon as per MoE permit no 222/2008, prior to discharge to the -13 m LAT discharge point. However, based on the design basis in Tangguh, the oily contaminated sewer also receives wastewater from production system such as from Amine unit, causing high level of COD, hence from CPI can not be discharged directly to the sea. The wastewater is currently routed into the produced water tank to be treated with the produced water. No discharge of treated oily water from CPI to the common outfall. Chemically contaminated wastewater The chemically contaminated wastewater is treated in the neutralization pit to normalize the pH level between 6–9 as per MoE permit no 222/2008 and then discharge through the -13m LAT discharge point. The average discharge from this source is about 1342 m3/day. New wastewater stream was introduced to the neutralizing pit is the wastewater from new carbon bed wash in amine carbon filter unit. Permanent HDPE line was installed to route wastewater. 2.1.2. Solid Waste Management Non Hazardous Solid Waste The activity of this solid waste management includes organic waste i.e. food waste; recyclable waste i.e. cans, bottles, and glass; inert landfill i.e. insulation, rockwool and styrofoam; reusable waste i.e. used tyre and cement bag; and burnable waste i.e. paper, cardbox and thin plastic sheet. The waste management facility at Tangguh includes the non-hazardous waste incinerator, wood chipper machine and composter, plastic shredder and can compactor, as well as the operation of ex-construction inert landfill and new organic waste landfill. The waste profile generated during this reporting period is presented in Monitoring Section. Inert waste is disposed off to dedicated inert landfill located in the eastern side of step 3 camp. This landfill is lined with HDPE sheets and provided leachate collection pit which is regularly sampled by internal and external laboratory. Waste to be disposed off to inert landfill shall be completed with waste transfer note containing type, volume and generator of waste. The report of the inert waste is updated in monthly basis. The reusable waste such as tyre, cement bags and timber waste are stockpiled at Central Waste Accumulation Area (CWAA) located near non hazardous waste container. This waste is available for other contractors wanting to reuse it. Recyclable waste such as beverage cans, plastic bottles and glass bottles is managed at CWAA. Beverage cans are compacted in a can compactor and plastic bottles are shredded in a plastic granulator. These two machines have reduced a significant amount of waste volume and extensively save space in the container. This waste is sent to waste facility at Sorong.


8

Figure 3. Plastic Granulator and Can Compactor

Under the PSC Scheme, scrap metals are categorized as national asset and needs to undergo write off process approval prior to disposal. This waste is currently stockpiled at Shorebase area and the record of the waste is maintained. This waste is contained in wooden boxes until the write off process finalized. The wood chipper machine is operating on continuous basis to chip the timber waste. The wood chip is utilized for covering the organic waste pit and later for new organic landfill, as well as for composting and re-vegetation program. BP through the logistic contractor provides a dedicated team to operate and segregate the timber waste for chipping.

Figure 4. Wood Chipper

Dedicated personnel are assigned to manage and monitor the day to day operation of the landfill. This landfill is lined with HDPE sheet and provided with leachate collection pond. The leachate is then transferred by using vacuum truck for further treatment at STP Zone C.


9

Figure 5. Organic Waste Landfill

Efforts are being done to extend the lifespan of the current organic waste landfill. One of the efforts is to maximize composter’s efficiency. Woodchip feeding to the composter is reduced and replaced by incinerator ash with a volume-based composition 1 incinerator ash : 3 food waste : 5 woodchip. This effort in some extent has increase the amount of food waste to the composter which previously report the volume compost product generated was 18,000 kg/month whereas currently compost product can reached its capacity to 21,000 kg/month. This compost is utilized for re-vegetation program and landscaping activity as planting media and fertilizer to increase soil nutrient. Procuring food dryer will also be other alternative pursued to reduce the water content in the food waste. This equipment is to be purchased in 2012. Other efforts which will be executed is to increase the exiting organic landfill for up to 1.25 meter high equivalent to 5000 m3 additional food waste which is able to prolong the lifespan of the landfill for another 1.5 years, which enable the landfill project to be executed in a better timing.

Figure 6. Organic Waste Composter

Burnable waste such as paper, cardbox and thin plastic sheet is sent off to non hazardous waste landfill at Centralized Waste Accumulation Area. The burnable waste to be sent off to the incinerator shall be completed with transfer note containing the type, volume and generator of waste. Record is maintained and updated in monthly basis.


10

Hazardous Waste Hazardous waste such as used oil, used oil filters, paint cans, spent catalyst, contaminated soil, etc generated from BP operations activities are temporarily stored in a licensed temporary hazardous waste storage prior to the shipment to licensed hazardous waste collector (PPLI) in Cileungsi, West Java. Tangguh has a contract in place with PPLI for hazardous waste disposal, including onsite assistance for packaging and labeling of the hazardous waste. Regular shipment to PPLI has been carried out to meet the maximum 90 days of storage period per permit requirement. Vessel to transport the hazardous waste has a hazardous waste transport permit issued from Directorate General Sea Communication with a recommendation letter from MoE. For this reporting period, there were 4 hazardous waste shipment to PPLI from May to October 2011. From mercury catalyst change out process during TAR 1 and TAR 2, approximately 80 m3 (364 drums) of mercury spent were generated. Two drums of which containing mercury concentration greater than 260 mg/kg currently stored at new temporary hazardous waste storage which the permit has been issued by Bintuni Environmental Office on 26 August 2011. Spent catalyst with mercury content greater than 260 mg/kg are to be sent to permitted retorting facility which currently not available in Indonesia. The permitting process for this will be processed together for the waste from both TAR’s. Due to the lengthy process estimated for this process, request to store this hazardous waste for more than 90 days have been submitted and approved by Bintuni Regent on 26 August 2011. 2.1.3. Revegetation The revegetation program of about 100 ha at the end of LNG construction phase within Tangguh site have been observed to be sustained well. The need to conduct maintenance of the revegetated area has been significantly reduced. The only effort to ensure the sustainability of the trees is now by visual monitoring. Any areas which required particular attention or treatment, is to be reported to logistics for further treatment. No significant impact on erosion and sedimentation are observed in this reporting period.

Figure 7. Maintenance of Revegetated Area


11

2.1.4. Air Emission As per MoE letter no BP-5590/Dep-I/LH/07/2010, MoE has confirmed Tangguh’s updated maximum flaring estimation during normal operation of 8,900 MMSCF from July-December 2010 and 17,800 MMSCF (17.8 BCF) in 2011. The effort in reducing the flaring is continuing to minimize impact to the environment, with the target of 5% reduction from the 2011 number of 17.8 BCF. At the end of October 2011, the actual flaring is 7.8 BCF. This is due to rigorous assurance process and several initiatives for flaring reduction done as part of flaring continuous improvement program.

2011 CUMULATIVE FLAREActual vs Limit (as of 30-Oct-2011)

7,778 - Actual

14,878 - Limit

16,910

-

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

20,000

01-J

an

16-J

an

30-J

an

13-F

eb

27-F

eb

13-M

ar

27-M

ar

10-A

pr

24-A

pr

08-M

ay

22-M

ay

05-J

un

19-J

un

03-J

ul

17-J

ul

31-J

ul

14-A

ug

28-A

ug

11-S

ep

25-S

ep

09-O

ct

23-O

ct

06-N

ov

20-N

ov

04-D

ec

18-D

ec

31-D

ec

MM

SCF

Actual Weekly Flare Cumulative Actual Flare Cumulative Limit Flare Figure 8. Flaring during Operation Period

Actual CO2 emission from Tangguh activities from January–October 2011 is 3.8 million tonnes. The source of the emission are the LNG plant operation (flaring, turbines, boilers, Acid Gas Incinerator, etc) and smaller portion from internal combustion engine emission calculated based on fuel consumption used for vehicle, boat, and other equipments using diesel/gasoline fuel. The total number for 2011 would be lower than the initial estimate of about 5.2 millions tonnes. Tangguh continues to monitor CO2 emissions in 2012. 2.1.5. Water Management Fresh water supplies required for project activities are secured from several sources including bottled water, temporary RO facility and the permanent desalination facility. The average water production of the RO is 1000 m3/day while the permanent desalination facility is 750 m3/day which gives the total production of 1750 m3/day. Fresh water is processed through a filtration system by using sands and occasionally using chlorination. 2.1.6. Hydrocarbon and Chemical Storage and Handling The Tangguh LNG’s policy is to confine all fuel and liquid chemical storage in retention berms/secondary containment to prevent against the risk of spill contamination to the soil. Tank identity, content, volume and warning sign shall be labelled on the tank. Any chemicals shall be accompanied with MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet). Emergency equipments are put in place in each chemical and fuel storage such as fire extinguisher,


12

first aid kit, spill kit and eye/body wash unit. The standards for the containment are being monitored periodically for compliance through internal audits and inspections. Risk analysis on any to-be–purchased chemicals by company is carried to ensure the chemicals having low impact to the environment, health and safety. Inspection to all fuel storage and chemical storage is conducted regularly. Any findings from the inspection recorded in the inspection checklist and followed up accordingly. As part of the continuous improvement program, the secondary containments of some tanks have been re-modified to meet the 110% capacity. Secondary containment re-modification is monitored in regular basis to track the progress. Most tanks have also been completed with labels, warning signs, oily water separator and oil spill kit, others are in progress as per schedule. Drip pan trays are used during maintenance and refuelling and personnel involved in these activities have been properly trained. Posters are strategically placed to maintain awareness on proper refuelling and maintenance procedures. Oil and chemical spill kit have been distributed within needed area for immediate response in case of spill. Full and detailed records are maintained of any spills, however minor. Any spill is recorded and reported every 6 months to Ditjen Migas for spill less than 15 bbls. Immediate notification to Ditjen Migas will be prepared for spill more than 15 bbls. No spill more than 15 bbls occurred during the reporting period. Any deficiencies found within operation activities are directed to relevant department within BP Operation. There were 6 minor spill incident reported in the reporting period with total spill less than 15 bbls. Immediate actions were taken to response to these spills and investigations were conducted for improvement.

2.2. Gas Production Facilities and Gas Transmission (GPF) The two VR-A and VR-B platforms, as well as the two subsea pipelines are operational. The platforms are normally unattended platform; however, routine monitoring/ maintenance visit are ongoing. Pipeline inspection program has been done to check the integrity of the pipeline. 2.3. Drilling Activities There is no drilling activity in this reporting period. Drilling program as part of the Tangguh Exploration and Appraisal Plan (TEAP) is scheduled for 1Q 2012, with 3 firm and 1 optional wells are planned to be drilled as part of this TEAP. This exploration well activity is not covered under Integrated Tangguh AMDAL. Separate UKL/UPL is has been developed and submitted to Local Government of Bintuni and West Papua Province. The UKL/UPL presentation to the Local Government of Bintuni was held on 28 October 2011. 2.4. Environmental Management System

Fourth internal audit was conducted on 22–24 July 2011 with finding results of 39 minor non-Conformities and 45 observations. ISO champions meetings are regularly conducted. An enhancement program on employees’ awareness relating to environmental management through ISO14001 campaign is ongoing. Champions and Document Controls


13

from each department are responsible to ensure ISO 14001 requirements in their respective areas are fully followed with the supervision of ISO14001 coach. ISO campaign as part of the preparation of Surveillance Audit on 24–27 October 2011, was conducted on 29 September–3 October 2011. The one of the objective of this campaign was to increase employees’ awareness on ISO 14001 requirements especially waste management which has been an issue for previous audits. The activities covered waste segregation race, ISO14001 quiz, housekeeping competition and recordkeeping competition. Training for trainings were also been held by our ISO14001 consultant. These certified trainers were targeted to conduct ISO 14001 awareness trainings so that the ISO14001 awareness training target can be achieved. External surveillance audit by external accreditation body was conducted at the end of October with no finding and some recommendations. 3. Environmental Monitoring Plan The objective of environmental monitoring program is to ensure that environmental management has been performed effectively and to ensure compliance with AMDAL’s requirements and applicable environmental regulations. BP has secured environmental monitoring contract with a certified external Indonesian laboratory to perform regular monthly and quarterly sampling and laboratory analysis in line with AMDAL and permitting requirements. In addition, BP has also internal site laboratory to conduct regular day-to-day internal sampling and monitoring programs onsite. 3.1. LNG Plant and its Supporting Facilities including Marine Facilities 3.1.1. Wastewater Monitoring Sewage The treated effluent from Sewage Treatment Plants is sampled and analysed at the discharge points prior to discharge into the seawater at the common outfall -13 meter LAT. The effluent discharge and receiving ambient sea water are monitored weekly and measured against the prevailing Indonesian regulations KEP-112/MENLH/2003 and KEP 51/2004 respectively as stipulated in AMDAL and applicable Indonesian regulation and permit no.562/2007, permit no. 222/2008. In this reporting period, all parameters for STP zone A, Zone C and Permanent STP effluent are in compliance with the standards except BOD5 concentration 120 mg/l at STP zone C for one time in June 2011. This most likely happened due to sludge build up in the treatment tank. It returned to normal after sludge was skimmed. Sludge clean up program has been put in place in order to mitigate recurrence.


14

pH STP Zone A

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Mar-11

Apr-11

May-11

Jun-11

Jul-11 Aug-11

Sep-11

Oct-11

BulanpH Baku Mutu Baku Mutu

BOD5 STP Zone A

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Mar-11

Apr-11

May-11

Jun-11

Jul-11 Aug-11

Sep-11

Oct-11

Bulan

BO

D

BOD5 Baku Mutu

O & G STP Zone A

0123456789

1011

Mar-11

Apr-11

May-11

Jun-11

Jul-11 Aug-11

Sep-11

Oct-11

Bulan

O &

G

O & GBaku Mutu

TSS STP Zone A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Mar-11

Apr-11

May-11

Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11

Sep-11

Oct-11

Bulan

TSS

TSS Baku Mutu

Figure 9. Wastewater Quality from STP Step 3 Camp Zone A

pH STP Zone C

0123456789

10

Mar-11

Apr-11

May-11

Jun-11

Jul-11

Aug-11

Sep-11

Oct-11

Bulan

pH

pH Baku Mutu Baku Mutu

BOD5 STP Zone C

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11Bulan

BO

D

BOD5 Baku Mutu

O & G STP Zone C

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Mar-11

Apr-11

May-11

Jun-11

Jul-11

Aug-11

Sep-11

Oct-11

Bulan

O &

G

O & G Baku Mutu

TSS STP Zone C

0

20

40

60

80

100

120


TSS

TSS Baku Mutu

Figure 10. Wastewater Quality from STP Step 3 Camp Zone C


15

pH STP Utility

0123456789

10

Mar-11

Apr-11

May-11

Jun-11

Jul-11 Aug-11

Sep-11

Oct-11

Bulan

pH

pH Baku M utu Baku M utu

BOD5 STP Utility

0

20

40

60

80

100

120


BO

D

BOD5 Baku Mutu

O & G STP Utility

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Mar-11

Apr-11

May-11

Jun-11

Jul-11

Aug-11

Sep-11

Oct-11

Bulan

O &

G

O & G Baku M utu

TSS STP Utility

0

20

40

60

80

100


TSS

TSS B aku Mutu

Figure 11. Wastewater Quality from STP Utility Produced Water Short term plan of produced water treatment which currently being applied is the installation of temporay filtration unit, aeration unit and biological treatement in STP Zone B Step 3 camp. This treatment configuration will be applied until the completion of permanent produced water treatment plant constrution which expected by end of 2011. As per approval from MoE through a letter no. B-7088/MENLH/09/2010 to use load-based standard for the parameter COD, phenol and NH3-N until the completion of the permanent WWTP by 30 December 2011, the quality effluent of produced water is in compliance with the standards.

COD Produced Water

010002000300040005000600070008000

Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11

Bulan

CO

D

COD B aku M utu

O & G Produced Water

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0


Bulan

O &

G

O & G Baku M utu


16

H2S Produced Water

0.0000.100

0.2000.300

0.400

0.500

0.600

Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11


Sep-11 Oct-11

Bulan

H2S

H2S Baku M utu

NH3-N Produced Water

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep OctBulan

NH

3-N

NH3-N Baku M utu

Phenol Produced Water

0.003.006.009.00

12.0015.0018.0021.0024.00


Bulan

Phen

ol

Phenol Total Baku M utu

pH Produced Water

0

2

4

6

8

10


Bulan

pH


TDS Produced Water

0500

10001500200025003000350040004500

Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11


Sep-11 Oct-11

Bulan

TDS

TDS Baku M utu

Methanol Produced Water

0

20

40

60

80

100

120


Bulan

Met

hano

l

M ethano l Baku M utu

Figure 12. Produced Water Quality

Brine Water Monitoring result of brine water from RO and Desalination unit is in compliance with MoE wastewater discharge permit except TSS of desalination brine water in June amd September 2011. Bintuni Bay is naturally turbid and has high TSS content. During AMDAL baseline survey in 2000-2001, TSS was found to be high in some stations up to 144 mg/l. The event of TSS from desalination discharge that is higher than standard of 80 mg/l (based on MoE Decree no 51/2004) would likely occur again due natural condition of Bintuni Bay.


17

pH Desalination Unit

0

2

4

6

8

10


pH

pH Baku M utu Baku Mutu

TSS Desalination Unit

020406080

100120140160180


TSS

TSS B aku M utu

Salinity Desalination Unit

0

20

40

60

80

100

Mar-11

Apr-11

May-11

Jun-11

Jul-11

Aug-11

Sep-11

Oct-11

Bulan

Salin

ity

Salintas pada 30 m titik pembuangan

Figure 13. Desalination Unit Brine Water Quality

Oily Contaminated Wastewater The oily contaminated wastewater is treated in the CPI (Corrugated Plate Interceptor) to remove hydrocarbon content up to permitted level as per MoE permit no 222/2008, prior to discharge to the -13 m LAT discharge point. However, the oily contaminated sewer also receives wastewater from production system such as from Amine unit, causing high level of COD, hence from CPI can not be discharged directly to the sea. All CPI effluent is routed to produced water tank for further treatment in WWTP zone B. Chemically contaminated wastewater The chemically contaminated wastewater is treated in the neutralization pit to normalize the pH level between 6-9 as per MoE permit no 222/2008 which then discharge through the -13m LAT discharge point.


18

pH Neutralization Pit

0

2

4

6

8

10

Mar-11

Apr-11

May-11

Jun-11

Jul-11 Aug-11

Sep-11

Oct-11

Bulan

pH


COD Neutralization Pit

0

50

100

150

200

250


CO

D

COD Baku Mutu TSS Neutralization Pit

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Mar-11

Apr-11

May-11

Jun-11

Jul-11

Aug-11

Sep-11

Oct-11

Bulan

TSS

TSS Baku Mutu

Toxic Neutralization Pit

0

2

3

5

6

8


Toxi

c M

etal

Toxic M etal Baku Mutu

Figure 14. Neutralising Pit Wastewater Quality 3.1.2. Solid Waste Monitoring Monitoring continues on Tangguh Operation waste management also including on subcontractor’s temporary waste storage facilities to ascertain regular collection of waste, collection place and disposal at the organic waste pits or inorganic waste collection place to be later sent to waste collector to offsite recycling facility. Documentation for waste transportation, including waste manifests, are assessed as part of monitoring process. Routine monitoring is also carried out in CWAA, landfill, STP and incinerator. Solid waste profile is shown in the following figure.


19

Weekly Food Waste Delivery and Compost Production March - October 2011

0500

100015002000250030003500400045005000550060006500

W1

- M

arW

2 -

Mar

W3

- M

arW

4 -

Mar

W5

- M

arW

1 -

Apr

W2

- Ap

rW

3 -

Apr

W4

- Ap

rW

5 -

Apr

W1

- M

ayW

2 -

May

W3

- M

ayW

4 -

May

W5

- M

ayW

1 -

June

W2

- Ju

neW

3 -

June

W4

- Ju

neW

5 -

June

W1

- Ju

lyW

2 -

July

W3

- Ju

lyW

4 -

July

W5

- Ju

lyW

1 -

Aug

W2

- Au

gW

3 -

Aug

W4

- Au

gW

5 -

Aug

W1

- Se

ptW

2 -

Sept

W3

- Se

ptW

4 -

Sept

W5

- Se

ptW

1 -

Oct

W2

- O

ctW

3 -

Oct

W4

- O

ctW

5 -

Oct

Period (week)

Was

te D

eliv

ery/

Pro

duct

(Kg)

Food Waste (kg) Wood Chip (kg) Compost Product (kg)

Figure 15. Food Waste Profile

Weekly Waste Delivery on CWAA2 Area March - October 2011

0

50

100

150

200

W1

- Mar

W2

- Mar

W3

- Mar

W4

- Mar

W5

- Mar

W1

- Ap

rW

2 -

Apr

W3

- Ap

rW

4 -

Apr

W5

- Ap

rW

1 -

May

W2

- M

ayW

3 -

May

W4

- M

ayW

5 -

May

W1

- Jun

eW

2 - J

une

W3

- Jun

eW

4 - J

une

W5

- Jun

eW

1 -

July

W2

- Ju

lyW

3 -

July

W4

- Ju

lyW

5 -

July

W1

- A

ugW

2 -

Aug

W3

- A

ugW

4 -

Aug

W5

- A

ugW

1 -

Sept

W2

- Se

ptW

3 -

Sept

W4

- Se

ptW

5 -

Sept

W1

- O

ctW

2 -

Oct

W3

- O

ctW

4 -

Oct

W5

- O

ct

Period (week)

Tota

l Del

iver

y(m

3)

Incinerated waste (m3) Mixed wood waste (m3) Metal Scrap (m3)

Saw Dust Waste (m3) Tire Waste (piece)

Figure 16. Solid Non-Hazardous Waste Profile


20

3.1.3. Revegetation No significant impact on the erosion and sedimentation management as revegetation program at site has been observed sustained well. The only effort to ensure the sustainability of the trees by visual monitoring. Any areas which required particular attention or treatment, is to be reported to logistics department for further treatment. 3.1.4. Air Emission The result of emission and ambient air monitoring activities conducted in July 2011 shows that all parameters are in compliance with relevant Indonesian regulation (Kep-13 of 2009 for emission air and PP 41/1999 for ambient air) as well as Tangguh LNG project standard as stipulated in the AMDAL. BP contracted external laboratory to perform sampling on boilers, acid gas incinerator stack, gas turbine, gensets, solid waste incinerators, and several points within the site as outlined in the following tables.

Table 2 Ambient Air Sampling LNG Tangguh (July 2011) Standard

Nearshore 1 Nearshore 2

Shorebase Behind Mobile Blueroof Onshore I

PP No. 41/1999

SO2 mg/Nm3 <90 <90 <90 <90 <90 900

CO mg/Nm3 <5000 <5000 <5000 <5000 <5000 30000

NO2 mg/Nm3 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 150

HC mg/Nm3 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 160

Particulate mg/Nm3 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 230

PM 10 mg/Nm3 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 150

PM 2.5 mg/Nm3 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 65

Parameter Unit

Monitoring Result

Overall, ambient air parameters are still within the standard indicating no significant impact of the operations activities to the ambient air within the site. The emission from solid waste incinerator, boiler, regent gas heater and Acid Gas Incinerator (AGI) stack is also still within the standard as outlined in the following tables. The standard derived from Tangguh Integrated AMDAL and the MoE Decree no 13/2009 regarding Air Emission Standard from Oil and Gas Industry.

Table 3 Result of Emission Sampling on AGI (July 2011)

Unit

Acid Gas Incinerator

B Utility

Acid Gas Incinerator A

Utility

Standard (KepMen

KLH 13/2009)

Sulphur Dioxide SO2 mg/m3 10 29 2600Parameter


21

Table 4 Result of Emission Sampling on Boiler (July 2011)

UnitBoiler Stack

A Boiler Stack BBoiler Stack

C

Standard (KepMen

KLH 13/2009)

Total Particulate mg/m3 <1 <1 <1 50

Opacity * % <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 20

Nitrogen Dioxide NOx mg/m394.8 102 96.6 400

Sulphur Dioxide SO2 mg/m3 <6 6 8 150

Parameter

Table 5 Result of Gas Turbine Emission Sampling (July 2011)

UnitGas Turbine Train 1 - PR

Gas Turbine Train 1 - MR

Standard (KepMen KLH

13/2009)

mg/m3 <1 <1 50Nitrogen Dioxide NOx mg/m3 30.4 46.4 320Sulphur Dioxide SO2 mg/m3 <6 <6 150

Total ParticulateParameter

Table 6 Result of Flaring Sampling (July 2011)

UnitFlare Stack -

ORFFlare Stack -

BOG

Standard (KepMen KLH

13/2009)

Opasitas % 12.8 * 40Parameter

Note : *Flare Stack at BOG only used intermittent (not continuous)

Table 7 Result of Generator Set Emission Sampling

Parameter Unit Step 1 G2

Step 3 Zone A

G-1

Step 3 Zone B

G-2

Step 3 Zone C

G-3

Combo Dock G-

1

Standard (KepMen

KLH 13/2009

and AMDAL)

Hydrogen Sulfide H2S mg/m3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 30

Nitrogen Dioxide NO2 mg/m3 38 15 19 53 53 320

Sulphur Dioxide SO2 mg/m3 92 121 131 139 50 873

Carbon Monoxide CO mg/m3 300 263 168 163 258 -

Total Particulate mg/m3 26 26 24 23 105 350

Tangguh LNG has installed online continuous emission monitoring (CEM) equipment on four stacks, which are from two Acid Gas Incinerators and two turbines. The equipments are now operating however still needs some adjustments to calibrate the results. O2 online analyser is in progress to be completed at the end of 2011. CEM result is reported to MoE on a 3-monthly basis. 3.1.5. Hydrocarbon and Chemical Storage and Handling The management of fuel and chemical used onsite is robust and in compliance with AMDAL and the Indonesian regulations. The number and volumes of spills were significantly reduced. Actions were immediately taken to clean up all spills and lesson


22

learned to mitigate recurrence. The waste from the spill, including the contaminated soil/gravel is handled as hazardous waste, to be later disposed to offsite hazardous waste treatment facility. Regular spill drill and training were performed to ensure the readiness of response team in handling oil/chemical spill. Regular inspection and socialization was conducted on the storage area with particular focus on the storage for chemicals and oil. Comprehensive inspection was conducted to identify all storage tanks within the site and recommendations for improvement have been provided for further follow up. Actions have been taken in steps to close all gaps. The actions include secondary containment remodification to meet 110% capacity, improvement of secondary containment liner, labeling, warning sign, oily water separator and oil spill kit availability.

Figure 17. Oil Spill Drill – Oil Boom Deployment

3.2. Gas Production Facilities and Gas Transmission (GPF) The GPF construction activities are completed and the monitoring of the GPF area is part of the whole BP Operation activities as outlined in the previous section of LNG and its supporting facilities. 3.3. Drilling Activities No drilling activity in this reporting period. 4. Environmental Studies During the reporting period, no environmental related study is conducted. Flora and fauna is conducted in November-December 2011 and Marine mammal monitoring update study is planned to be conducted by Q2 2012. 5. Health and Safety Safety Journey to Zero Incident campaign series started this year, was rolled out with the first quarter focus in Procedure compliance and PPE compliance. The second half campaign was focused in Marine Safety. Another campaign is being rolled out in order to maintain the good HSE performance up to the year end. New ways were introduced for energizing


23

people and driving their Safety awareness through safety leadership message videos and safety quiz for particular subjects. These approaches are expected to drive more attention of the supervisors or leaders as well as the workers involved routine activities on the task risks and the subsequent impact from inadequately controlled risks. One of videos was a sharing lessons learned from injured person (IP) of an incident. As part of improving organization capability of Safety section, most of safety advisors have completed HSE Professional Certification (AK3 Migas) this year. HSE performance for the period is outlined in the following table.

Table 8. Key Indicators on Safety Performance 2011 Nov 2011 YTD 2011 Target Fatality [Number of incidents]

0 0 0

High Potential Incidents [Number of incidents]

0 0 Monitor

Day Away From Work Frequency [Frequency per 200,000 hours]

0 0 0

Recordable Injury Frequency [Frequency per 200,000 hours]

0 0.12(6) 0.11 (7)

Safety performance in the second half of 2011 was excellent, with zero recordable injuries up to November. It is expected to maintain zero recordable injury up to the year end to ensure achieving the targeted RIF of 0.11. All 6 Recordable Injuries (RI) occurred in the fist half involved contractor personnel. Four RI cases in period of January to April have been included in the previous report. One RI happened in May when a medical treatment given to worker of Asphalt Mixing Plant after his right hand finger tip caught between gear guard support and crowbar. Another RI case took place in June when a cook splashed by hot oil cooking while cooking. The critical contributors to the incidents are lack of focus, lack of planning and improper use of tools. All incidents have been thoroughly investigated and lessons learned have been circulated internally. TLNG site field safety stand-down series have been conducted to re-emphasize the important of always stay focus in every work we do and persistently conduct thorough hazard identifications. In the second half of 2011 the Tangguh Process Safety (PS) focus has been on conducting safe shutdown work and delivering robust assurance for the safe re-start of equipment after intrusive work, where we could have the risk of a Loss of Primary Containment (LOPC) leading to injury, environmental impact and business loss. Our integrity and re-instatement of plant focus has been successful, year-to-date, as we have undertaken major equipment re-starts without serious incident. Our PS KPIs continue to develop and we are showing a significant quarter by quarter improvement. Lastly, we completed our 4th quarter review of risk registers at site, with the risk owners and teams and this review will set our risk reduction plans for 2012 to ensure we continue to be proactive in the goal of continuous risk reduction.


24

The BP Control of Work (CoW) implementation is continuously improving. CoW Audit monthly target set higher than 2010 was always achieved every month. Regular PA meetings were held to communicate and discuss the audit findings as well as lessons learned to relevant PA, AA & SC. A series of PA coaching were also run as part of follow up recommendation from steering committee to improve the quality of toolbox talk. The effectiveness of the CoW audit is evident as shown by the minor audit findings such as administrative compliance. A special task force has been developed and now is working to incorporate all relevant lessons learned in the reviewed CoW procedures. CoW self assessment is now being progressed to asses the compliance to CoW standard requirements. Assessments have been started since September for Babo and Non Production Facilities and will be continued with assessment in Process Area. Contractor safety management system is consistently implemented across Tangguh Organisation. HSE meeting with Contractors Site leadership are conducted regularly on weekly and monthly basis. Contractor Senior Leadership engagement with BP Senior Leadership were carried out twice this year, ie June and November. Participations of contractor site leadership are maintained in Control of Work Audit, safety talk, and site visit. Contractors’ initiatives such as internal Contractor HSE campaign, HSE meeting and HSE reward program effectively improved HSE awareness of their team. HSE performances for Contractors are monitored on monthly basis against agreed KPI. As part of monitoring implementation of HSE Plan and BP HSE requirements contractors are audited in periodically. Contractors overall performance reviews are carried out at defined interval with respective users. Revision of HSE requirements in contract document (Exhibit H) is being progressed and planned to be implemented for future contracts starting 2012. This revision has included all good practices and applied standards previously not standardized in the contract document as well as ad Good progress was shown by contractors for getting professional certification (AK3 Migas) for their HSE officers. The effectiveness of the program is evident as indicated on monthly HSE KPI (Lagging/Leading Indicators) All contractors started engagement on the implementation of Tangguh How We Operate (HWO) as Tangguh LNG Operating & Safety Culture starting April this year and continued in monthly basis. The contractors HWO implementations are further reviewed and incorporated to relevant department HWO implementation. Quarterly review of contractors and department HWO implementations were done twice this year led by AOM. Industrial Hygiene More thorough industrial hygiene programs have been enrolled to manage health hazards which may occur during both normal and maintenance operations. The turn around projects had been utilized to gather worker’s exposure profiles during specific activities. The exposure monitoring includes BTEX (Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylene), mercury, welding fumes, noise, particulates, etc. These data is fed into the development


25

process of similar exposure groups (SEGs) and task based exposure profiles. The data than used to comprehend the industrial hygiene baseline risk assessment and linked to the health surveillance programs. The overall process/methods have been recognized as one of best practice in the Region. A series of fatigue management training programs have been completed both at Tangguh LNG site and Jakarta office to increase people awareness on fatigue and know how to manage it appropriately. The program include a train of trainer sessions which is designed to provide in-depth knowledge and skill on fatigue management to enable people to coordinate and drive the fatigue management program within his/her team. The programs are provided for BP employees and contractors. A collaborative efforts done by the Food Safety Committee and the Engineering (Project Modification) team in conducting a comprehensive assessment to ensure the food safety management system is implemented appropriately during the new Steenkool kitchen commissioning and critical aspects are addressed prior to operations. Asbestos survey is completed and the results have been consolidated to enhance the asbestos management program. A set of action plans which addressing the required follow-up actions in relevant areas have been agreed and registered into the Traction. A Tangguh Operations Asbestos Network is formed to facilitate discussion, sharing information and ideas, and updating the latest news on asbestos issues at site. A comprehensive asbestos register is maintained, updated and communicated to relevant parties.

Figure 18. Industrial Hygine Activities

(Food Safety Inspection, PPE Training and Fit Test, and Health Hazard Awareness ) Occupational Health Continuous improvement has been carried out in all Occupational Health programs, such as widening the scope of Fitness for Task program, maintaining knowledge and skill of Medical Emergency Response personnel by conducting regular drill on some areas, enhancing the integration of Health Surveillance program with Industrial hygiene exposures assessment results, conducting continues Malaria Control program and performing continuous Health Promotion activities both on Occupational and general health issues. Drug and Alcohol program has been launched by conducting random drug test at site. All employees can be asked to do the test randomly, but the priority is on employees who


26

identified having higher safety risk on their tasks. Senior Management was the first group underwent the test, this is reflection of their commitment to this policy and program. As part of the Global Health promotion activities, we had conducted a wellness promotion event (Run-A-Muck 2011) to encourage all employees having routine exercises. This event was well responded, reflected by many of employees contributed to this event. Quality of Live Improvement program that has been launched is also well accepted by our employees and many of them have obtained significant benefit for their health from this program. 6. External Panel Annual Review and Status of Non Compliances The Tangguh Lenders’ External Panel visited Jakarta and Papua in November 2011. This is the first visit of the new External Panel (EP-2) with the objective of performing a compliance review of environmental and social performance. During their visit, the External Panel found no Level-2 non compliance related to the environment or social section. There might be few potential Level-1 non-compliances and also some recommendations proposed by EP on the environmental program. The Lenders’ EP report is still being developed; hence actual findings are not yet confirmed. Any finding will be followed up accordingly. As per the Tangguh ADB Loan Tranche Agreement non-compliance is defined as follows: Level 1 E&S Non Compliance: “means any failure to comply with, or any action or omission which is inconsistent with, any Environmental and Social Requirement, but which failure, action, or omission does not constitute a Level 2 E&S Non Compliance.” Level 2 E&S Non Compliance: “means any failure to comply with, or any action or omission which is inconsistent with, any Environmental and Social Requirement, but which failure, action, or omission (considered either on its own or in conjunction with any other one or more such failure(s), action(s) or omission(s)): Has resulted in or is reasonably likely to result in material damage or harm to, or a

material and adverse impact on, the environment; Constitutes or is reasonably likely to constitute a “significant impact” for the purposes

of and as defined in the Indonesian Decree Concerning Guidelines for the Determination of Significant Impacts (BAPEDAL Decree No. KEP056/1994);

Has resulted in or is reasonably likely to result in material damage or harm to, or a material and adverse impact on, the lives, livelihood, quality of life, health, safety, security, property or cultural heritage of affected people; or

Has resulted in or is reasonably likely to result in the revocation of, or the refusal to grant, any approval, consent, permit or other authorization required for the implementation of the Tangguh E&S Project (but only to the extent that such approval, consent, permit or other authorization is required for implementation o the Tangguh E&S Project at that time.”

7. Additional Information NA


27

8. Evaluation Results There were continuous improvements in the environmental management practices across the Tangguh LNG activities both start up and operation phase during the reporting period. The challenge is to maintain consistency and continuous implementation of the environmental management programs. Flaring reduction initiative where Tangguh managed to reduce flaring due to rigorous assurance process as part of continuous improvement process. As of end October 2011, the actual flaring is 7,8 BCF (much less than the forecast 2011 of 17,8 BCF). Another example related to solid waste management to improve composter efficiency from 18,000 kg/month to 21,000 kg/month. Tangguh LNG environmental team conducts regular discussions with other departments as well as with the operations’ contractors to review any issues that potentially lead to a non-compliance to AMDAL and relevant regulations. Actions to prevent the non compliance incident is discussed, agreed and be followed up with the relevant team. A weekly Tangguh Compliance Tracking Matrix is maintained. Implementation of Environmental Management System – ISO 14001 has consistently been carried out well. In maintaining the requirements of ISO 14001, in this reporting period, internal audit was conducted. All findings have been closed out in timely manner. Champion meetings are regularly held to update the status of EMP and empowering champions with ISO 14001 knowledge. Surveillance Audit was scheduled conducted at the end of October 2011, with no finding and some recommendations. The recommendations will be tracked for closure.

environmental and social monitoring report to zero incident ... sub-paragraph (a) ... line at the...

Documents