entanglement entropy in shock wave collisions

27
Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions Christian Ecker XI Vienna Central European Seminar Vienna November 27, 2015 Based on work with Daniel Grumiller, Stefan Stricker 1506.02658 (JHEP); & Wilke van der Schee, Philipp Stanzer (15XX.XXXXX); & Ognen Kapetanoski, Behnoush Khavari (16XX.XXXXX)

Upload: others

Post on 23-Dec-2021

13 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Entanglement Entropyin Shock Wave Collisions

Christian Ecker

XI Vienna Central European SeminarVienna

November 27, 2015

Based on work with Daniel Grumiller, Stefan Stricker 1506.02658 (JHEP);& Wilke van der Schee, Philipp Stanzer (15XX.XXXXX);

& Ognen Kapetanoski, Behnoush Khavari (16XX.XXXXX)

Page 2: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Motivation

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 1/22

Central question:

How does a strongly coupled quantum system which is initially far-from equilibrium evolve to its equilibrium state?

[picture: S. Schlichting]

[see also talk by E. Lopez]

Page 3: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Quark-gluon plasma in heavy ion collisions

Quark-gluon plasma (QGP) is a deconfined phase of quarks and gluonsproduced in heavy ion collision (HIC) experiments at RHIC and LHC.

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 2/22

Page 4: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Why AdS/CFT?The QGP produced in HIC's behaves like a strongly coupled liquid rather than a weakly coupled gas.

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 3/22

Perturbative QCD? Lattice QCD?Not at strong

coupling!Not for dynamics!

Page 5: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

AdS/CFT correspondence

AdS/CFT correspondence:

Type IIB string theory on AdS5 x S5 is equivalent to

N =4 super symmetric SU(NC) Yang-Mills theory in 4D.

[Maldacena 97]

Supergravity limit:

Strongly coupled large NC N =4 SU(N

C ) SYM theory is

equivalent to classical (super)gravity on AdS5.

Boundary:4-dim. CFT

Bulk:5-dim. GR

z

Strategy:

● Use N=4 SYM as toymodel for QCD.● Build a gravity model dual to HICs, like colliding gravitational shock waves.● Switch on the computer and solve the 5-dim. gravity problem numerically.● Use the holographic dictionary to compute observables in the 4 dim. field

theory form the gravity result.

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 4/22

[see talks by Takayanagi, Lopez, Ammon, Riegler, ...]

Page 6: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Holographic thermalization

Thermalization = Black hole formation

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 5/22

Page 7: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Entanglement entropy

Divide the system into two parts A,B.The total Hilbert space factorizes:

quantum field theory

lattice model

BA

A B

The reduced density matrix of A is obtained by the trace over

Entanglement entropy is defined as the von Neumann entropy of

A:

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 6/22

Page 8: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Entanglement entropy in a two quantum bit system

Entanglement entropy is a measure for entanglement in a quantum system.

A (maximally) entangled state in a two spin 1/2 system:

Alice Bob

?

A product state (not entangled) in a two spin 1/2 system:

Alice Bob

? ?

Consider a quantum system of two spin 1/2 dof's.Observer Alice has only access to one spin and Bob to the other spin.

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 7/22

Page 9: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

A

B

L

Entanglement entropy in quantum field theories

x

B A B

L

1+1 dim. CFTs

With the replica method one gets analytic results for 1+1 dim. CFTs.

3-sheeted Riemann surface

One finds universal scaling with interval size:

UV cut off

central charge of the CFT

The Basic Method to compute entanglement entropy in quantum field theories is the replica method.

Notable generalization: 1+1 dim. Galilean CFTs

AdS/CFT provides a simpler method that works also in higher dimensions.

Involves path integrals over n-sheeted Riemann surfaces ~ it's complicated!

[Holzhey-Larsen-Wilczek 94]

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 8/22

[Bagchi-Basu-Grumiller-Riegler 15]

Page 10: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Holographic entanglement entropy

AB

zextremal surface

w, y, ...

x

t=const.

[Ryu-Takayanagi 06,Hubeny-Rangamani-Takayanagi 07]

D dim. CFT

UV cut off in CFT

D+1 dim. GR

Within AdS/CFT entanglement entropy can be computed form the area of minimal (extremal) surfaces in the gravity theory.

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 9/22

Page 11: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Holographic entanglement entropy● In practice computing extremal co-dim. 2 hyper-surfaces is

numerically involved.

● Can we somehow simplify our lives?

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 10/22

[E. Tonni 14: minimal surface for a star shaped boundary region (red) in AdS4 computed with Surface Evolver]

Yes we can!

[ongoing work: CE-Grumiller-Kapetanoski-Khavari]

Page 12: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Entanglement entropy from geodesics

z

w, y, ...A

homogeneousdirections

B

x

t=const.D dim. CFT

D+1 dim. GR

UV (IR) cut off in CFT (GR)

L

Consider a stripe region of infinite extend in homogeneous directions of the geometry.The entanglement entropy is prop. to the geodesics length in an auxiliary spacetime.

geodesic

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 11/22

Page 13: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Numerics: relax, don't shoot!

● There are two standard numerical methods for solving two point boundary value problems. Shooting:Very sensitive to initialization on asymptotic AdS spacetimes.

Relaxation:Converges very fast if good initial geodesic is provided.

Geodesic equation as two point boundary value problem.

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 12/22

[see Numerical Recipes]

Page 14: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Isotropization of homogeneous plasma

A homogeneous but initially highly anisotropic (N=4 SYM) plasma relaxates to its isotropic equilibrium state.

The dual gravity model describes the formation of a black brane in an anisotropic AdS5 geometry.

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 13/22

[Chesler-Yaffe 09]

[CE-Grumiller-Stricker 15]

Page 15: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Geodesics in anisotropic AdS5 black

brane background

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 14/22

● Far-from equilibrium geodesics can go beyond the horizon.

● Near equilibrium geodesics stay outside the horizon.

[CE-Grumiller-Stricker 15]

Page 16: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Quasinormal ringdown of entanglement entropy

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 15/22

The late time dynamics of EE is captured by a single (complex) number:

[CE-Grumiller-Stricker 15]

Page 17: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Holographic shock wave collisions

HIC is modeled by two colliding sheets of energy with infinite extend in transverse direction and Gaussian profile in beam direction. [Chesler-Yaffe 10]

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 16/22

y

Page 18: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Wide vs. narrow shocks

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 17/22

Two qualitatively different dynamical regimes

● Wide shocks (~RHIC): full stopping

[Solana-Heller-Mateos-van der Schee 12]

● Narrow shocks (~LHC): transparency

y y

transparency

Page 19: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Geodesics and apparent horizon

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 18/22

[CE-Grumiller-Van der Schee-Stanzer-Stricker 15?]

Page 20: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Two point functions

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 19/22

Preliminary Preliminary

Two point functions for operators O(t,x) of large conformal weight can be computed form the length of geodesics.

t=const.

z

x x'

[Balasubramanian-Ross 00]

[CE-Grumiller-Van der Schee-Stanzer-Stricker 15?]

L

transparency (?)

Page 21: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Entanglement entropy

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 20/22

PreliminaryPreliminary

t=const.

L

A

z

[CE-Grumiller-Van der Schee-Stanzer-Stricker 15?]

Page 22: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Summary● The near equilibrium dynamics of holographic entanglement shows

quasinormal mode behaviour.

● In holographic shock wave collisions the entanglement entropy and the two point function may serve as order parameter for the full stopping–transparency transition.

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 21/22

Ongoing Work● Going beyond supergravity: string corrections, semi-holography, …

● Better understanding of EE in HICs: different shapes, higher dim. surfaces, other backgrounds, …

[CE-Mukhopadhyay-Preiss-Rebhan-Stricker]

[CE-Grumiller-Van der Schee-Stanzer-Stricker 15?]

[CE-Grumiller-Stricker 15]

[CE-Grumiller-Kapetanoski-Khavari-Stanzer]

Page 23: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Take home messageComplicated stuff in CFT often is very simple on the AdS side.

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 22/22

thermalization

entanglement entropy

two point function

?

= black hole formation

area of extremal surface

=length of geodesic

=

Page 24: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Strong subadditivity● A fundamental property of entanglement entropy is strong subadditivity.● Hard to prove within QFT, very intuitive in the dual gravity picture.

X X

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 23/22

Page 25: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Strong subadditivity

X X

Z Z

● A fundamental property of entanglement entropy is strong subadditivity.● Hard to prove within QFT, very intuitive in the dual gravity picture.

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 24/22

Page 26: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Strong subadditivity

X X

Z Z

● A fundamental property of entanglement entropy is strong subadditivity.● Hard to prove within QFT, very intuitive in the dual gravity picture.

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 25/22

Page 27: Entanglement Entropy in Shock Wave Collisions

Numerical check of strong subadditivity

Preliminary

804.5

805

805.5

806

806.5

807

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

S

t

S(A)+S(B)S(A and B)+S(A or B)

Christian Ecker (TU-Wien) Vienna, Nov. 27, 2015 26/22

[CE-Grumiller-Van der Schee-Stricker 15?]