ensafe inc. environmenta and management consultants · oihcr; v^_11l__«, ensafe inc. environmenta...

42
Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTAL AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS 5724 Summer Trees Drive Memphis. Tennessee 38134 Telephone 901-372-7962 Facsimile 901-372-2454 www.ensafe.com February 25, 1999 Mr. Neil Handler Remedial Project Manager USEPA Region 1 1 Congress Street Suite 1100 (HBO) Boston, MA 02114 Re: Stamina Mills Site TCE Spill Area Treatment System Air Data Summary Report Dear Mr. Handler, In producing internal copies of this report, we found that one SDG had been omitted from Appendix A. EnSafe is therefore submitting two copies of this SDG as errata pages for the February 17 th document. If you have any questions regarding this report, please give me a call at 901/372-7962. Sincerely, EnSafe Inc. by: ' liori Anne G Technical Services cc: G. Mackin, Collins & Aikman Products Co. M. DeStefano, RIDEM A. Snow, EnSafe Inc. C. Lizotte, Envirogen T. Mao, Trojan Technologies Charleston Cincinnati Dallas Jackson, TN • Koln Knoxville Lancaster Memphis Nashville Norfolk Paducah Pensacola Raleigh

Upload: others

Post on 23-Aug-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

OihcrV^_11L__laquo

ENSAFE INC ENVIRONMENTAL AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS

5724 Summer Trees Drive bull Memphis Tennessee 38134 bull Telephone 901-372-7962 bull Facsimile 901-372-2454 bull wwwensafecom

February 25 1999

Mr Neil Handler Remedial Project Manager USEPA Region 1 1 Congress Street Suite 1100 (HBO) Boston MA 02114

Re Stamina Mills Site TCE Spill Area Treatment System mdash Air Data Summary Report

Dear Mr Handler

In producing internal copies of this report we found that one SDG had been omitted from Appendix A EnSafe is therefore submitting two copies of this SDG as errata pages for the February 17th document

If you have any questions regarding this report please give me a call at 901372-7962

Sincerely

EnSafe Inc

by liori Anne G Technical Services

cc G Mackin Collins amp Aikman Products Co M DeStefano RIDEM A Snow EnSafe Inc C Lizotte Envirogen T Mao Trojan Technologies

Charleston bull Cincinnati bull Dallas bull Jackson TN bull Koln bull Knoxville bull Lancaster bull Memphis bull Nashville bull Norfolk bull Paducah bull Pensacola bull Raleigh

SDG E0911

Site EPA-NE Reference No 4061-Pig Data Validation Worksheet Cover Page - Page 1

REGION I ORGANIC DATA VALIDATION

The following data package has been validated

Lab Name SOWMethod No CaseProject No SDG No

Sampling Date(s) Shipping Date(s)

No of SamplesMatrix Date Recd by lab

Traffic Report Sample Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No Bottle Blank No Field Duplicate Nos PES Nos

The Region I EPA-NE Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Analyses revision was used to evaluate the data andor approved modifications to the EPA-NE Functional Guidelines were used to evaluate the data and are attached to this cover page (attach modified criteria from EPA approved QAPjP or amendment to QAPjP)

A Tier n or Tier HI evaluation was used to validate the data (circle one) If a Tier n validation with a partial Tier in was used then identify samples parameters etc that received partial Tier ffl validation

The data were evaluated based upon the following parameters

- Overall Evaluation of Data - Field Duplicates - Data Completeness (CSF Audit - Tier I) - Sensitivity Check - Preservation amp Technical Holding Times - PE SamplesAccuracy Check - GCMS amp GCECD Instrument Performance Check - Target Compound Identification - Initial amp Continuing Calibrations - Compound Quantitation and Reported -Blanks Quantitation Limits - Surrogate Compounds -TICs - Internal Standards - Semivolatile and PesticidePCB Cleanup - Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate - System Performance

Region I Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable Data J - Numerical value associated with compound is an estimated quantity R - The data are rejected as unusable The R replaces the numerical value or sample quantitation limit U - Compound not detected at that numerical sample quantitation limit UJ - The sample quantitation limit is an estimated quantity TB BB EB - Compound detected in aqueous trip blank aqueous bottle blank or aqueous equipment blank associated with soilsediment samples

Validators Name Company Phone Number

Date Validation S Date Validation Completed

1296

The data validator generates a Data Validation Report applicable to Data Validation Tiers II and III that consists of the following components in the order specified below (Refer to Section 11 for a description of each of the Data Validation Report components)

1 Organic Regional Data AssessmentInorganic Regional Data Assessment (ORDAIRDA) Form

2 Data Validation Memorandum a Narrative b Table I-Qualifier Recommendation Summary Table c Table H-Overall Evaluation of Data d bdquo Table ffl-Tentatively Identified Compounds e Data Summary Tables

3 Standard Data Validation Worksheets a Manual b Automated Data Review Reports (ie CADRE)

4 Support Documentation a Copy of non-CLP analytical method eg DAS methods modified EPA methods b Copies of PES Score Reports Vendor PES QC Acceptance Limits c Copies of Telephone LogsCommunication Forms for

RSCC communications Requests for laboratory data resubmissionsclarifications Communications with samplers resolving sampling problems Communications with TPOLead Chemist to report contractually-deficient data for rejectionreduced payment Communications with EPA Site Manager concerning possible data rejection EPA Site Manager authorization for alternate DV tier

d Copies of data supporting recommendations for reduced payment resulting from CSF Audit andor PE sample result evaluation

e Original data to support recommendations for data rejectionnon-payment identified from Tier n or Tier ID data validation

f Copies of field sampling notes andor field report supplied by field sampler g Copies of EPA-approved amendments to QAPjP andor SAP describing modified criteria

to be used for validating site data 5 CSF Completeness Evidence Audit 6 DQO Summary Form

The data validator is responsible for implementing all corrective actions required by the contractor Lead Chemist in response to EPA-NE data validation oversight findings

1296

75 poundk

11o 8 1 cr

OJ

QQ hk Praquo ^^ i

fl ee 2

CO re

^SBSS= assess

-H C

s CD -H

Mj cr co c

L ^C oJJ

o -H

bullbull gt

5 -u u

1 i 3

0

i

g ce

CO

1 a 73

bCUu-

CE

O

CD ^ 0

-^ in

-H CE

1 CD

CJ C bullbull

U_ 0) 1

ce

2 cebullo e

H

5 O

T^73

lt

eg mdashi c u- CD o

CO 3 -Hcr CT 4-1

in

cr

CO re

4gt w c

a o si

lppoundcoS-C2-

2 8 8 s

s-t IS|-3lt^3

Q1 CD ^O

C 0 ltTbull-1 mdash( 03

^ J Q gt~ 3

E shyi inCO CD

CO C ~O

co ox

CO O 4J

cu c wgtshy CO E

1 Q

Q (O O Q u rf D U ^

CL o bullbull CD ltmdash CO

CO

^ Co ^ o jj D NC CD E

evt -H m

CC U 01

^^

f O

^T lti

ltJ)

(

O cr

lt^

if)

E80

1Hceo

O

1 1

ce

sect deg

c bullmdash

w

si ce CU

ff

^x CJ CCD

CD -U

i

o a -H

raquoHa

-w c o

l~ C

o cu E

S

Q mdash 73

E

OO

CO aJ

E -w D

CO C

CO CU

E H ) t U

CO Q1

A ce

I S 2 ^ O ex Q

CU

CDt-i

jjCO

CO

CU CD -J CC

JJ CO CU CO -D CO CO

tshy Ushy --4 D D CD mdash

-C 0 u X C CD 0)

ce 4) 1)

sectraquo

CO E -fc-J CD JJ 3 CU mdashlt J-J CO CU

O S CO CO CO

ai-l ro C

CO R _

|

00

CO U ca

co rs c3

V

O secten

bullo ee s u

1 en CO H

ec

cu en en ec

re co 0

o 53

S ow

C -Z

o u u w

00mdashc g s

12 e3

gt laquo 00

bull

Isect CO

o CO

CO U

S deg 73 =

a Q

73

w

eObullJ

xgt -2 Ui C8

gt 2~ 2 laquo (8 Q re

O CX Q 03

CO O

I a gtW O 73

EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet VOASV - PestPCB

COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT

Organic Fractions

Missing Information Date Lab Contacted Date Received

Validator 6- 1 lAW^3 Date

1296

pound

u cs a

bullS9 8 5 5Q

1 iibullu u ^s cc re mdash C P

o C Te O

5 CJ 22 2

11| -7 T= deg ^ u mdash 5

= a bdquobull re

1311

10 (J bullmdash

llsl

u mdash u = h w fcu

Si U) IS) win

C3 O

5 C5 U

o ri

J o ST r

gt lt2-2 K

15mdash U a a u D

CO M

II

bullo o

Os 0gt ON

J5 _s 73

lt

o u to OJ

impo

und

Nn

bull3 bull8 tJ St= t

J3 S o

E To pound s E

co CO laquo

e

n _in

u u

c Cl it

Perf

onnn

iSlaquo Ogt i

C ^ Z bulls S s m

poun

d N

n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00

c o =3 CO

yen5 bull Js= _e

z I bullo

fj bullB

U

1 5 Ib i

spound F

c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W

y ee IZ = i telt J5

yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0

O bulliC a I I deg S | a

i rl

o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I

mo U^ ce

P 1 I amp

Vo

latil

e it

Per

forn

in

Sem

irola

tlle

^ w amp5 1 o

Q V) 5 o u

C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI

is

6

so

-fc o

ij13 Q

amp Si

V

trade U

c fO

c3 -2 e3 o

o

C3

es a i

^05

CC

es

u

2 O

S

Q a =u gt255

s5

1

^s bullC

G2O

ca

I Q

o

CO

n

CO

0

cs u

3 o

CO

^3

re

re

cs

CO

O

ei ca -a u

bulla

i

fc 2ipound

O u CO

bull3

oo 5

o3 a

bull o 53y 2

I 5

a 3 o U

o U

C =

II raquou 13

Jpound

re 5

bullI 3 5

gtraquoSlaquoa

S

5 h

TS 2

^12S

S

O

63

I I re

R

o o

55 G ogt

n en

C5 = OJ

TB U sectbull a s

a a

Jea

Si bull=

bull-bullbull-J

S 5

laquo C3

A C3 -J

-lt

bulls^bullc 52 B

bullI

Usect

aE

V

u ce Q

isectn-s raquou

e g

Ishy

=

lt

I U

rj K

o c iS o U

^ ca la en

R Ji amp a So

O U II

C55

CO

a O 5

S o

^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu

l a S

e

o U g

I

r O To^o a

u re H u u CO

CX bullg

o

TO

CA

Si 4)

O o

bulla

o a o u

CO 00 o

C8

V)

J3

U

u Lgt 5 5

U 0gt o 15

pound3 gt

s

u

u Cpound 5 pound

4 pound

osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO

CO C

o gtCO CM u ^ s m

g en

Tol

uene

-tig OO

11 o

V

Z

R

ecov

ery

i1o u 1 oo ^ oo

J

O

I 13 1^

bullB O 1

a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1

C O oO

i

V

amp0^ AfV o

ltigt

u R

aU CX

2 S

o -f^

re

tc

bulla

o

s oo o

(A

O u CM

3

^ o C3

5 a ea

u o =i e CA

m-O

O

5 Z pound a

gt CO o

laquo

e TJ lt

2 2 0) 1ampS W

~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M

c B CO bull llt CT) Cu

^ r0u u C3

u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy

2

1 u

Rkrj

111 V G^gt

6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO

a n campgt

U8 3 -g c amp

2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt

u 22

|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu

ufe 2 i bull= CO

^o ^ o CM CO QJ

S 5 gUa E

n lt Q ^ u -o

rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj

TT

oa - 2 6 -~

Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT

w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM

3

lt ^ o SO

eten

tion

i1

111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]

Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 2: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

SDG E0911

Site EPA-NE Reference No 4061-Pig Data Validation Worksheet Cover Page - Page 1

REGION I ORGANIC DATA VALIDATION

The following data package has been validated

Lab Name SOWMethod No CaseProject No SDG No

Sampling Date(s) Shipping Date(s)

No of SamplesMatrix Date Recd by lab

Traffic Report Sample Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No Bottle Blank No Field Duplicate Nos PES Nos

The Region I EPA-NE Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Analyses revision was used to evaluate the data andor approved modifications to the EPA-NE Functional Guidelines were used to evaluate the data and are attached to this cover page (attach modified criteria from EPA approved QAPjP or amendment to QAPjP)

A Tier n or Tier HI evaluation was used to validate the data (circle one) If a Tier n validation with a partial Tier in was used then identify samples parameters etc that received partial Tier ffl validation

The data were evaluated based upon the following parameters

- Overall Evaluation of Data - Field Duplicates - Data Completeness (CSF Audit - Tier I) - Sensitivity Check - Preservation amp Technical Holding Times - PE SamplesAccuracy Check - GCMS amp GCECD Instrument Performance Check - Target Compound Identification - Initial amp Continuing Calibrations - Compound Quantitation and Reported -Blanks Quantitation Limits - Surrogate Compounds -TICs - Internal Standards - Semivolatile and PesticidePCB Cleanup - Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate - System Performance

Region I Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable Data J - Numerical value associated with compound is an estimated quantity R - The data are rejected as unusable The R replaces the numerical value or sample quantitation limit U - Compound not detected at that numerical sample quantitation limit UJ - The sample quantitation limit is an estimated quantity TB BB EB - Compound detected in aqueous trip blank aqueous bottle blank or aqueous equipment blank associated with soilsediment samples

Validators Name Company Phone Number

Date Validation S Date Validation Completed

1296

The data validator generates a Data Validation Report applicable to Data Validation Tiers II and III that consists of the following components in the order specified below (Refer to Section 11 for a description of each of the Data Validation Report components)

1 Organic Regional Data AssessmentInorganic Regional Data Assessment (ORDAIRDA) Form

2 Data Validation Memorandum a Narrative b Table I-Qualifier Recommendation Summary Table c Table H-Overall Evaluation of Data d bdquo Table ffl-Tentatively Identified Compounds e Data Summary Tables

3 Standard Data Validation Worksheets a Manual b Automated Data Review Reports (ie CADRE)

4 Support Documentation a Copy of non-CLP analytical method eg DAS methods modified EPA methods b Copies of PES Score Reports Vendor PES QC Acceptance Limits c Copies of Telephone LogsCommunication Forms for

RSCC communications Requests for laboratory data resubmissionsclarifications Communications with samplers resolving sampling problems Communications with TPOLead Chemist to report contractually-deficient data for rejectionreduced payment Communications with EPA Site Manager concerning possible data rejection EPA Site Manager authorization for alternate DV tier

d Copies of data supporting recommendations for reduced payment resulting from CSF Audit andor PE sample result evaluation

e Original data to support recommendations for data rejectionnon-payment identified from Tier n or Tier ID data validation

f Copies of field sampling notes andor field report supplied by field sampler g Copies of EPA-approved amendments to QAPjP andor SAP describing modified criteria

to be used for validating site data 5 CSF Completeness Evidence Audit 6 DQO Summary Form

The data validator is responsible for implementing all corrective actions required by the contractor Lead Chemist in response to EPA-NE data validation oversight findings

1296

75 poundk

11o 8 1 cr

OJ

QQ hk Praquo ^^ i

fl ee 2

CO re

^SBSS= assess

-H C

s CD -H

Mj cr co c

L ^C oJJ

o -H

bullbull gt

5 -u u

1 i 3

0

i

g ce

CO

1 a 73

bCUu-

CE

O

CD ^ 0

-^ in

-H CE

1 CD

CJ C bullbull

U_ 0) 1

ce

2 cebullo e

H

5 O

T^73

lt

eg mdashi c u- CD o

CO 3 -Hcr CT 4-1

in

cr

CO re

4gt w c

a o si

lppoundcoS-C2-

2 8 8 s

s-t IS|-3lt^3

Q1 CD ^O

C 0 ltTbull-1 mdash( 03

^ J Q gt~ 3

E shyi inCO CD

CO C ~O

co ox

CO O 4J

cu c wgtshy CO E

1 Q

Q (O O Q u rf D U ^

CL o bullbull CD ltmdash CO

CO

^ Co ^ o jj D NC CD E

evt -H m

CC U 01

^^

f O

^T lti

ltJ)

(

O cr

lt^

if)

E80

1Hceo

O

1 1

ce

sect deg

c bullmdash

w

si ce CU

ff

^x CJ CCD

CD -U

i

o a -H

raquoHa

-w c o

l~ C

o cu E

S

Q mdash 73

E

OO

CO aJ

E -w D

CO C

CO CU

E H ) t U

CO Q1

A ce

I S 2 ^ O ex Q

CU

CDt-i

jjCO

CO

CU CD -J CC

JJ CO CU CO -D CO CO

tshy Ushy --4 D D CD mdash

-C 0 u X C CD 0)

ce 4) 1)

sectraquo

CO E -fc-J CD JJ 3 CU mdashlt J-J CO CU

O S CO CO CO

ai-l ro C

CO R _

|

00

CO U ca

co rs c3

V

O secten

bullo ee s u

1 en CO H

ec

cu en en ec

re co 0

o 53

S ow

C -Z

o u u w

00mdashc g s

12 e3

gt laquo 00

bull

Isect CO

o CO

CO U

S deg 73 =

a Q

73

w

eObullJ

xgt -2 Ui C8

gt 2~ 2 laquo (8 Q re

O CX Q 03

CO O

I a gtW O 73

EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet VOASV - PestPCB

COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT

Organic Fractions

Missing Information Date Lab Contacted Date Received

Validator 6- 1 lAW^3 Date

1296

pound

u cs a

bullS9 8 5 5Q

1 iibullu u ^s cc re mdash C P

o C Te O

5 CJ 22 2

11| -7 T= deg ^ u mdash 5

= a bdquobull re

1311

10 (J bullmdash

llsl

u mdash u = h w fcu

Si U) IS) win

C3 O

5 C5 U

o ri

J o ST r

gt lt2-2 K

15mdash U a a u D

CO M

II

bullo o

Os 0gt ON

J5 _s 73

lt

o u to OJ

impo

und

Nn

bull3 bull8 tJ St= t

J3 S o

E To pound s E

co CO laquo

e

n _in

u u

c Cl it

Perf

onnn

iSlaquo Ogt i

C ^ Z bulls S s m

poun

d N

n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00

c o =3 CO

yen5 bull Js= _e

z I bullo

fj bullB

U

1 5 Ib i

spound F

c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W

y ee IZ = i telt J5

yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0

O bulliC a I I deg S | a

i rl

o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I

mo U^ ce

P 1 I amp

Vo

latil

e it

Per

forn

in

Sem

irola

tlle

^ w amp5 1 o

Q V) 5 o u

C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI

is

6

so

-fc o

ij13 Q

amp Si

V

trade U

c fO

c3 -2 e3 o

o

C3

es a i

^05

CC

es

u

2 O

S

Q a =u gt255

s5

1

^s bullC

G2O

ca

I Q

o

CO

n

CO

0

cs u

3 o

CO

^3

re

re

cs

CO

O

ei ca -a u

bulla

i

fc 2ipound

O u CO

bull3

oo 5

o3 a

bull o 53y 2

I 5

a 3 o U

o U

C =

II raquou 13

Jpound

re 5

bullI 3 5

gtraquoSlaquoa

S

5 h

TS 2

^12S

S

O

63

I I re

R

o o

55 G ogt

n en

C5 = OJ

TB U sectbull a s

a a

Jea

Si bull=

bull-bullbull-J

S 5

laquo C3

A C3 -J

-lt

bulls^bullc 52 B

bullI

Usect

aE

V

u ce Q

isectn-s raquou

e g

Ishy

=

lt

I U

rj K

o c iS o U

^ ca la en

R Ji amp a So

O U II

C55

CO

a O 5

S o

^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu

l a S

e

o U g

I

r O To^o a

u re H u u CO

CX bullg

o

TO

CA

Si 4)

O o

bulla

o a o u

CO 00 o

C8

V)

J3

U

u Lgt 5 5

U 0gt o 15

pound3 gt

s

u

u Cpound 5 pound

4 pound

osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO

CO C

o gtCO CM u ^ s m

g en

Tol

uene

-tig OO

11 o

V

Z

R

ecov

ery

i1o u 1 oo ^ oo

J

O

I 13 1^

bullB O 1

a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1

C O oO

i

V

amp0^ AfV o

ltigt

u R

aU CX

2 S

o -f^

re

tc

bulla

o

s oo o

(A

O u CM

3

^ o C3

5 a ea

u o =i e CA

m-O

O

5 Z pound a

gt CO o

laquo

e TJ lt

2 2 0) 1ampS W

~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M

c B CO bull llt CT) Cu

^ r0u u C3

u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy

2

1 u

Rkrj

111 V G^gt

6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO

a n campgt

U8 3 -g c amp

2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt

u 22

|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu

ufe 2 i bull= CO

^o ^ o CM CO QJ

S 5 gUa E

n lt Q ^ u -o

rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj

TT

oa - 2 6 -~

Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT

w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM

3

lt ^ o SO

eten

tion

i1

111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]

Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 3: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

Site EPA-NE Reference No 4061-Pig Data Validation Worksheet Cover Page - Page 1

REGION I ORGANIC DATA VALIDATION

The following data package has been validated

Lab Name SOWMethod No CaseProject No SDG No

Sampling Date(s) Shipping Date(s)

No of SamplesMatrix Date Recd by lab

Traffic Report Sample Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No Bottle Blank No Field Duplicate Nos PES Nos

The Region I EPA-NE Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Analyses revision was used to evaluate the data andor approved modifications to the EPA-NE Functional Guidelines were used to evaluate the data and are attached to this cover page (attach modified criteria from EPA approved QAPjP or amendment to QAPjP)

A Tier n or Tier HI evaluation was used to validate the data (circle one) If a Tier n validation with a partial Tier in was used then identify samples parameters etc that received partial Tier ffl validation

The data were evaluated based upon the following parameters

- Overall Evaluation of Data - Field Duplicates - Data Completeness (CSF Audit - Tier I) - Sensitivity Check - Preservation amp Technical Holding Times - PE SamplesAccuracy Check - GCMS amp GCECD Instrument Performance Check - Target Compound Identification - Initial amp Continuing Calibrations - Compound Quantitation and Reported -Blanks Quantitation Limits - Surrogate Compounds -TICs - Internal Standards - Semivolatile and PesticidePCB Cleanup - Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate - System Performance

Region I Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable Data J - Numerical value associated with compound is an estimated quantity R - The data are rejected as unusable The R replaces the numerical value or sample quantitation limit U - Compound not detected at that numerical sample quantitation limit UJ - The sample quantitation limit is an estimated quantity TB BB EB - Compound detected in aqueous trip blank aqueous bottle blank or aqueous equipment blank associated with soilsediment samples

Validators Name Company Phone Number

Date Validation S Date Validation Completed

1296

The data validator generates a Data Validation Report applicable to Data Validation Tiers II and III that consists of the following components in the order specified below (Refer to Section 11 for a description of each of the Data Validation Report components)

1 Organic Regional Data AssessmentInorganic Regional Data Assessment (ORDAIRDA) Form

2 Data Validation Memorandum a Narrative b Table I-Qualifier Recommendation Summary Table c Table H-Overall Evaluation of Data d bdquo Table ffl-Tentatively Identified Compounds e Data Summary Tables

3 Standard Data Validation Worksheets a Manual b Automated Data Review Reports (ie CADRE)

4 Support Documentation a Copy of non-CLP analytical method eg DAS methods modified EPA methods b Copies of PES Score Reports Vendor PES QC Acceptance Limits c Copies of Telephone LogsCommunication Forms for

RSCC communications Requests for laboratory data resubmissionsclarifications Communications with samplers resolving sampling problems Communications with TPOLead Chemist to report contractually-deficient data for rejectionreduced payment Communications with EPA Site Manager concerning possible data rejection EPA Site Manager authorization for alternate DV tier

d Copies of data supporting recommendations for reduced payment resulting from CSF Audit andor PE sample result evaluation

e Original data to support recommendations for data rejectionnon-payment identified from Tier n or Tier ID data validation

f Copies of field sampling notes andor field report supplied by field sampler g Copies of EPA-approved amendments to QAPjP andor SAP describing modified criteria

to be used for validating site data 5 CSF Completeness Evidence Audit 6 DQO Summary Form

The data validator is responsible for implementing all corrective actions required by the contractor Lead Chemist in response to EPA-NE data validation oversight findings

1296

75 poundk

11o 8 1 cr

OJ

QQ hk Praquo ^^ i

fl ee 2

CO re

^SBSS= assess

-H C

s CD -H

Mj cr co c

L ^C oJJ

o -H

bullbull gt

5 -u u

1 i 3

0

i

g ce

CO

1 a 73

bCUu-

CE

O

CD ^ 0

-^ in

-H CE

1 CD

CJ C bullbull

U_ 0) 1

ce

2 cebullo e

H

5 O

T^73

lt

eg mdashi c u- CD o

CO 3 -Hcr CT 4-1

in

cr

CO re

4gt w c

a o si

lppoundcoS-C2-

2 8 8 s

s-t IS|-3lt^3

Q1 CD ^O

C 0 ltTbull-1 mdash( 03

^ J Q gt~ 3

E shyi inCO CD

CO C ~O

co ox

CO O 4J

cu c wgtshy CO E

1 Q

Q (O O Q u rf D U ^

CL o bullbull CD ltmdash CO

CO

^ Co ^ o jj D NC CD E

evt -H m

CC U 01

^^

f O

^T lti

ltJ)

(

O cr

lt^

if)

E80

1Hceo

O

1 1

ce

sect deg

c bullmdash

w

si ce CU

ff

^x CJ CCD

CD -U

i

o a -H

raquoHa

-w c o

l~ C

o cu E

S

Q mdash 73

E

OO

CO aJ

E -w D

CO C

CO CU

E H ) t U

CO Q1

A ce

I S 2 ^ O ex Q

CU

CDt-i

jjCO

CO

CU CD -J CC

JJ CO CU CO -D CO CO

tshy Ushy --4 D D CD mdash

-C 0 u X C CD 0)

ce 4) 1)

sectraquo

CO E -fc-J CD JJ 3 CU mdashlt J-J CO CU

O S CO CO CO

ai-l ro C

CO R _

|

00

CO U ca

co rs c3

V

O secten

bullo ee s u

1 en CO H

ec

cu en en ec

re co 0

o 53

S ow

C -Z

o u u w

00mdashc g s

12 e3

gt laquo 00

bull

Isect CO

o CO

CO U

S deg 73 =

a Q

73

w

eObullJ

xgt -2 Ui C8

gt 2~ 2 laquo (8 Q re

O CX Q 03

CO O

I a gtW O 73

EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet VOASV - PestPCB

COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT

Organic Fractions

Missing Information Date Lab Contacted Date Received

Validator 6- 1 lAW^3 Date

1296

pound

u cs a

bullS9 8 5 5Q

1 iibullu u ^s cc re mdash C P

o C Te O

5 CJ 22 2

11| -7 T= deg ^ u mdash 5

= a bdquobull re

1311

10 (J bullmdash

llsl

u mdash u = h w fcu

Si U) IS) win

C3 O

5 C5 U

o ri

J o ST r

gt lt2-2 K

15mdash U a a u D

CO M

II

bullo o

Os 0gt ON

J5 _s 73

lt

o u to OJ

impo

und

Nn

bull3 bull8 tJ St= t

J3 S o

E To pound s E

co CO laquo

e

n _in

u u

c Cl it

Perf

onnn

iSlaquo Ogt i

C ^ Z bulls S s m

poun

d N

n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00

c o =3 CO

yen5 bull Js= _e

z I bullo

fj bullB

U

1 5 Ib i

spound F

c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W

y ee IZ = i telt J5

yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0

O bulliC a I I deg S | a

i rl

o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I

mo U^ ce

P 1 I amp

Vo

latil

e it

Per

forn

in

Sem

irola

tlle

^ w amp5 1 o

Q V) 5 o u

C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI

is

6

so

-fc o

ij13 Q

amp Si

V

trade U

c fO

c3 -2 e3 o

o

C3

es a i

^05

CC

es

u

2 O

S

Q a =u gt255

s5

1

^s bullC

G2O

ca

I Q

o

CO

n

CO

0

cs u

3 o

CO

^3

re

re

cs

CO

O

ei ca -a u

bulla

i

fc 2ipound

O u CO

bull3

oo 5

o3 a

bull o 53y 2

I 5

a 3 o U

o U

C =

II raquou 13

Jpound

re 5

bullI 3 5

gtraquoSlaquoa

S

5 h

TS 2

^12S

S

O

63

I I re

R

o o

55 G ogt

n en

C5 = OJ

TB U sectbull a s

a a

Jea

Si bull=

bull-bullbull-J

S 5

laquo C3

A C3 -J

-lt

bulls^bullc 52 B

bullI

Usect

aE

V

u ce Q

isectn-s raquou

e g

Ishy

=

lt

I U

rj K

o c iS o U

^ ca la en

R Ji amp a So

O U II

C55

CO

a O 5

S o

^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu

l a S

e

o U g

I

r O To^o a

u re H u u CO

CX bullg

o

TO

CA

Si 4)

O o

bulla

o a o u

CO 00 o

C8

V)

J3

U

u Lgt 5 5

U 0gt o 15

pound3 gt

s

u

u Cpound 5 pound

4 pound

osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO

CO C

o gtCO CM u ^ s m

g en

Tol

uene

-tig OO

11 o

V

Z

R

ecov

ery

i1o u 1 oo ^ oo

J

O

I 13 1^

bullB O 1

a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1

C O oO

i

V

amp0^ AfV o

ltigt

u R

aU CX

2 S

o -f^

re

tc

bulla

o

s oo o

(A

O u CM

3

^ o C3

5 a ea

u o =i e CA

m-O

O

5 Z pound a

gt CO o

laquo

e TJ lt

2 2 0) 1ampS W

~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M

c B CO bull llt CT) Cu

^ r0u u C3

u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy

2

1 u

Rkrj

111 V G^gt

6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO

a n campgt

U8 3 -g c amp

2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt

u 22

|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu

ufe 2 i bull= CO

^o ^ o CM CO QJ

S 5 gUa E

n lt Q ^ u -o

rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj

TT

oa - 2 6 -~

Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT

w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM

3

lt ^ o SO

eten

tion

i1

111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]

Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 4: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

The data validator generates a Data Validation Report applicable to Data Validation Tiers II and III that consists of the following components in the order specified below (Refer to Section 11 for a description of each of the Data Validation Report components)

1 Organic Regional Data AssessmentInorganic Regional Data Assessment (ORDAIRDA) Form

2 Data Validation Memorandum a Narrative b Table I-Qualifier Recommendation Summary Table c Table H-Overall Evaluation of Data d bdquo Table ffl-Tentatively Identified Compounds e Data Summary Tables

3 Standard Data Validation Worksheets a Manual b Automated Data Review Reports (ie CADRE)

4 Support Documentation a Copy of non-CLP analytical method eg DAS methods modified EPA methods b Copies of PES Score Reports Vendor PES QC Acceptance Limits c Copies of Telephone LogsCommunication Forms for

RSCC communications Requests for laboratory data resubmissionsclarifications Communications with samplers resolving sampling problems Communications with TPOLead Chemist to report contractually-deficient data for rejectionreduced payment Communications with EPA Site Manager concerning possible data rejection EPA Site Manager authorization for alternate DV tier

d Copies of data supporting recommendations for reduced payment resulting from CSF Audit andor PE sample result evaluation

e Original data to support recommendations for data rejectionnon-payment identified from Tier n or Tier ID data validation

f Copies of field sampling notes andor field report supplied by field sampler g Copies of EPA-approved amendments to QAPjP andor SAP describing modified criteria

to be used for validating site data 5 CSF Completeness Evidence Audit 6 DQO Summary Form

The data validator is responsible for implementing all corrective actions required by the contractor Lead Chemist in response to EPA-NE data validation oversight findings

1296

75 poundk

11o 8 1 cr

OJ

QQ hk Praquo ^^ i

fl ee 2

CO re

^SBSS= assess

-H C

s CD -H

Mj cr co c

L ^C oJJ

o -H

bullbull gt

5 -u u

1 i 3

0

i

g ce

CO

1 a 73

bCUu-

CE

O

CD ^ 0

-^ in

-H CE

1 CD

CJ C bullbull

U_ 0) 1

ce

2 cebullo e

H

5 O

T^73

lt

eg mdashi c u- CD o

CO 3 -Hcr CT 4-1

in

cr

CO re

4gt w c

a o si

lppoundcoS-C2-

2 8 8 s

s-t IS|-3lt^3

Q1 CD ^O

C 0 ltTbull-1 mdash( 03

^ J Q gt~ 3

E shyi inCO CD

CO C ~O

co ox

CO O 4J

cu c wgtshy CO E

1 Q

Q (O O Q u rf D U ^

CL o bullbull CD ltmdash CO

CO

^ Co ^ o jj D NC CD E

evt -H m

CC U 01

^^

f O

^T lti

ltJ)

(

O cr

lt^

if)

E80

1Hceo

O

1 1

ce

sect deg

c bullmdash

w

si ce CU

ff

^x CJ CCD

CD -U

i

o a -H

raquoHa

-w c o

l~ C

o cu E

S

Q mdash 73

E

OO

CO aJ

E -w D

CO C

CO CU

E H ) t U

CO Q1

A ce

I S 2 ^ O ex Q

CU

CDt-i

jjCO

CO

CU CD -J CC

JJ CO CU CO -D CO CO

tshy Ushy --4 D D CD mdash

-C 0 u X C CD 0)

ce 4) 1)

sectraquo

CO E -fc-J CD JJ 3 CU mdashlt J-J CO CU

O S CO CO CO

ai-l ro C

CO R _

|

00

CO U ca

co rs c3

V

O secten

bullo ee s u

1 en CO H

ec

cu en en ec

re co 0

o 53

S ow

C -Z

o u u w

00mdashc g s

12 e3

gt laquo 00

bull

Isect CO

o CO

CO U

S deg 73 =

a Q

73

w

eObullJ

xgt -2 Ui C8

gt 2~ 2 laquo (8 Q re

O CX Q 03

CO O

I a gtW O 73

EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet VOASV - PestPCB

COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT

Organic Fractions

Missing Information Date Lab Contacted Date Received

Validator 6- 1 lAW^3 Date

1296

pound

u cs a

bullS9 8 5 5Q

1 iibullu u ^s cc re mdash C P

o C Te O

5 CJ 22 2

11| -7 T= deg ^ u mdash 5

= a bdquobull re

1311

10 (J bullmdash

llsl

u mdash u = h w fcu

Si U) IS) win

C3 O

5 C5 U

o ri

J o ST r

gt lt2-2 K

15mdash U a a u D

CO M

II

bullo o

Os 0gt ON

J5 _s 73

lt

o u to OJ

impo

und

Nn

bull3 bull8 tJ St= t

J3 S o

E To pound s E

co CO laquo

e

n _in

u u

c Cl it

Perf

onnn

iSlaquo Ogt i

C ^ Z bulls S s m

poun

d N

n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00

c o =3 CO

yen5 bull Js= _e

z I bullo

fj bullB

U

1 5 Ib i

spound F

c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W

y ee IZ = i telt J5

yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0

O bulliC a I I deg S | a

i rl

o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I

mo U^ ce

P 1 I amp

Vo

latil

e it

Per

forn

in

Sem

irola

tlle

^ w amp5 1 o

Q V) 5 o u

C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI

is

6

so

-fc o

ij13 Q

amp Si

V

trade U

c fO

c3 -2 e3 o

o

C3

es a i

^05

CC

es

u

2 O

S

Q a =u gt255

s5

1

^s bullC

G2O

ca

I Q

o

CO

n

CO

0

cs u

3 o

CO

^3

re

re

cs

CO

O

ei ca -a u

bulla

i

fc 2ipound

O u CO

bull3

oo 5

o3 a

bull o 53y 2

I 5

a 3 o U

o U

C =

II raquou 13

Jpound

re 5

bullI 3 5

gtraquoSlaquoa

S

5 h

TS 2

^12S

S

O

63

I I re

R

o o

55 G ogt

n en

C5 = OJ

TB U sectbull a s

a a

Jea

Si bull=

bull-bullbull-J

S 5

laquo C3

A C3 -J

-lt

bulls^bullc 52 B

bullI

Usect

aE

V

u ce Q

isectn-s raquou

e g

Ishy

=

lt

I U

rj K

o c iS o U

^ ca la en

R Ji amp a So

O U II

C55

CO

a O 5

S o

^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu

l a S

e

o U g

I

r O To^o a

u re H u u CO

CX bullg

o

TO

CA

Si 4)

O o

bulla

o a o u

CO 00 o

C8

V)

J3

U

u Lgt 5 5

U 0gt o 15

pound3 gt

s

u

u Cpound 5 pound

4 pound

osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO

CO C

o gtCO CM u ^ s m

g en

Tol

uene

-tig OO

11 o

V

Z

R

ecov

ery

i1o u 1 oo ^ oo

J

O

I 13 1^

bullB O 1

a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1

C O oO

i

V

amp0^ AfV o

ltigt

u R

aU CX

2 S

o -f^

re

tc

bulla

o

s oo o

(A

O u CM

3

^ o C3

5 a ea

u o =i e CA

m-O

O

5 Z pound a

gt CO o

laquo

e TJ lt

2 2 0) 1ampS W

~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M

c B CO bull llt CT) Cu

^ r0u u C3

u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy

2

1 u

Rkrj

111 V G^gt

6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO

a n campgt

U8 3 -g c amp

2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt

u 22

|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu

ufe 2 i bull= CO

^o ^ o CM CO QJ

S 5 gUa E

n lt Q ^ u -o

rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj

TT

oa - 2 6 -~

Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT

w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM

3

lt ^ o SO

eten

tion

i1

111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]

Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 5: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

75 poundk

11o 8 1 cr

OJ

QQ hk Praquo ^^ i

fl ee 2

CO re

^SBSS= assess

-H C

s CD -H

Mj cr co c

L ^C oJJ

o -H

bullbull gt

5 -u u

1 i 3

0

i

g ce

CO

1 a 73

bCUu-

CE

O

CD ^ 0

-^ in

-H CE

1 CD

CJ C bullbull

U_ 0) 1

ce

2 cebullo e

H

5 O

T^73

lt

eg mdashi c u- CD o

CO 3 -Hcr CT 4-1

in

cr

CO re

4gt w c

a o si

lppoundcoS-C2-

2 8 8 s

s-t IS|-3lt^3

Q1 CD ^O

C 0 ltTbull-1 mdash( 03

^ J Q gt~ 3

E shyi inCO CD

CO C ~O

co ox

CO O 4J

cu c wgtshy CO E

1 Q

Q (O O Q u rf D U ^

CL o bullbull CD ltmdash CO

CO

^ Co ^ o jj D NC CD E

evt -H m

CC U 01

^^

f O

^T lti

ltJ)

(

O cr

lt^

if)

E80

1Hceo

O

1 1

ce

sect deg

c bullmdash

w

si ce CU

ff

^x CJ CCD

CD -U

i

o a -H

raquoHa

-w c o

l~ C

o cu E

S

Q mdash 73

E

OO

CO aJ

E -w D

CO C

CO CU

E H ) t U

CO Q1

A ce

I S 2 ^ O ex Q

CU

CDt-i

jjCO

CO

CU CD -J CC

JJ CO CU CO -D CO CO

tshy Ushy --4 D D CD mdash

-C 0 u X C CD 0)

ce 4) 1)

sectraquo

CO E -fc-J CD JJ 3 CU mdashlt J-J CO CU

O S CO CO CO

ai-l ro C

CO R _

|

00

CO U ca

co rs c3

V

O secten

bullo ee s u

1 en CO H

ec

cu en en ec

re co 0

o 53

S ow

C -Z

o u u w

00mdashc g s

12 e3

gt laquo 00

bull

Isect CO

o CO

CO U

S deg 73 =

a Q

73

w

eObullJ

xgt -2 Ui C8

gt 2~ 2 laquo (8 Q re

O CX Q 03

CO O

I a gtW O 73

EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet VOASV - PestPCB

COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT

Organic Fractions

Missing Information Date Lab Contacted Date Received

Validator 6- 1 lAW^3 Date

1296

pound

u cs a

bullS9 8 5 5Q

1 iibullu u ^s cc re mdash C P

o C Te O

5 CJ 22 2

11| -7 T= deg ^ u mdash 5

= a bdquobull re

1311

10 (J bullmdash

llsl

u mdash u = h w fcu

Si U) IS) win

C3 O

5 C5 U

o ri

J o ST r

gt lt2-2 K

15mdash U a a u D

CO M

II

bullo o

Os 0gt ON

J5 _s 73

lt

o u to OJ

impo

und

Nn

bull3 bull8 tJ St= t

J3 S o

E To pound s E

co CO laquo

e

n _in

u u

c Cl it

Perf

onnn

iSlaquo Ogt i

C ^ Z bulls S s m

poun

d N

n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00

c o =3 CO

yen5 bull Js= _e

z I bullo

fj bullB

U

1 5 Ib i

spound F

c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W

y ee IZ = i telt J5

yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0

O bulliC a I I deg S | a

i rl

o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I

mo U^ ce

P 1 I amp

Vo

latil

e it

Per

forn

in

Sem

irola

tlle

^ w amp5 1 o

Q V) 5 o u

C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI

is

6

so

-fc o

ij13 Q

amp Si

V

trade U

c fO

c3 -2 e3 o

o

C3

es a i

^05

CC

es

u

2 O

S

Q a =u gt255

s5

1

^s bullC

G2O

ca

I Q

o

CO

n

CO

0

cs u

3 o

CO

^3

re

re

cs

CO

O

ei ca -a u

bulla

i

fc 2ipound

O u CO

bull3

oo 5

o3 a

bull o 53y 2

I 5

a 3 o U

o U

C =

II raquou 13

Jpound

re 5

bullI 3 5

gtraquoSlaquoa

S

5 h

TS 2

^12S

S

O

63

I I re

R

o o

55 G ogt

n en

C5 = OJ

TB U sectbull a s

a a

Jea

Si bull=

bull-bullbull-J

S 5

laquo C3

A C3 -J

-lt

bulls^bullc 52 B

bullI

Usect

aE

V

u ce Q

isectn-s raquou

e g

Ishy

=

lt

I U

rj K

o c iS o U

^ ca la en

R Ji amp a So

O U II

C55

CO

a O 5

S o

^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu

l a S

e

o U g

I

r O To^o a

u re H u u CO

CX bullg

o

TO

CA

Si 4)

O o

bulla

o a o u

CO 00 o

C8

V)

J3

U

u Lgt 5 5

U 0gt o 15

pound3 gt

s

u

u Cpound 5 pound

4 pound

osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO

CO C

o gtCO CM u ^ s m

g en

Tol

uene

-tig OO

11 o

V

Z

R

ecov

ery

i1o u 1 oo ^ oo

J

O

I 13 1^

bullB O 1

a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1

C O oO

i

V

amp0^ AfV o

ltigt

u R

aU CX

2 S

o -f^

re

tc

bulla

o

s oo o

(A

O u CM

3

^ o C3

5 a ea

u o =i e CA

m-O

O

5 Z pound a

gt CO o

laquo

e TJ lt

2 2 0) 1ampS W

~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M

c B CO bull llt CT) Cu

^ r0u u C3

u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy

2

1 u

Rkrj

111 V G^gt

6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO

a n campgt

U8 3 -g c amp

2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt

u 22

|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu

ufe 2 i bull= CO

^o ^ o CM CO QJ

S 5 gUa E

n lt Q ^ u -o

rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj

TT

oa - 2 6 -~

Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT

w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM

3

lt ^ o SO

eten

tion

i1

111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]

Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 6: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

ai-l ro C

CO R _

|

00

CO U ca

co rs c3

V

O secten

bullo ee s u

1 en CO H

ec

cu en en ec

re co 0

o 53

S ow

C -Z

o u u w

00mdashc g s

12 e3

gt laquo 00

bull

Isect CO

o CO

CO U

S deg 73 =

a Q

73

w

eObullJ

xgt -2 Ui C8

gt 2~ 2 laquo (8 Q re

O CX Q 03

CO O

I a gtW O 73

EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet VOASV - PestPCB

COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT

Organic Fractions

Missing Information Date Lab Contacted Date Received

Validator 6- 1 lAW^3 Date

1296

pound

u cs a

bullS9 8 5 5Q

1 iibullu u ^s cc re mdash C P

o C Te O

5 CJ 22 2

11| -7 T= deg ^ u mdash 5

= a bdquobull re

1311

10 (J bullmdash

llsl

u mdash u = h w fcu

Si U) IS) win

C3 O

5 C5 U

o ri

J o ST r

gt lt2-2 K

15mdash U a a u D

CO M

II

bullo o

Os 0gt ON

J5 _s 73

lt

o u to OJ

impo

und

Nn

bull3 bull8 tJ St= t

J3 S o

E To pound s E

co CO laquo

e

n _in

u u

c Cl it

Perf

onnn

iSlaquo Ogt i

C ^ Z bulls S s m

poun

d N

n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00

c o =3 CO

yen5 bull Js= _e

z I bullo

fj bullB

U

1 5 Ib i

spound F

c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W

y ee IZ = i telt J5

yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0

O bulliC a I I deg S | a

i rl

o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I

mo U^ ce

P 1 I amp

Vo

latil

e it

Per

forn

in

Sem

irola

tlle

^ w amp5 1 o

Q V) 5 o u

C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI

is

6

so

-fc o

ij13 Q

amp Si

V

trade U

c fO

c3 -2 e3 o

o

C3

es a i

^05

CC

es

u

2 O

S

Q a =u gt255

s5

1

^s bullC

G2O

ca

I Q

o

CO

n

CO

0

cs u

3 o

CO

^3

re

re

cs

CO

O

ei ca -a u

bulla

i

fc 2ipound

O u CO

bull3

oo 5

o3 a

bull o 53y 2

I 5

a 3 o U

o U

C =

II raquou 13

Jpound

re 5

bullI 3 5

gtraquoSlaquoa

S

5 h

TS 2

^12S

S

O

63

I I re

R

o o

55 G ogt

n en

C5 = OJ

TB U sectbull a s

a a

Jea

Si bull=

bull-bullbull-J

S 5

laquo C3

A C3 -J

-lt

bulls^bullc 52 B

bullI

Usect

aE

V

u ce Q

isectn-s raquou

e g

Ishy

=

lt

I U

rj K

o c iS o U

^ ca la en

R Ji amp a So

O U II

C55

CO

a O 5

S o

^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu

l a S

e

o U g

I

r O To^o a

u re H u u CO

CX bullg

o

TO

CA

Si 4)

O o

bulla

o a o u

CO 00 o

C8

V)

J3

U

u Lgt 5 5

U 0gt o 15

pound3 gt

s

u

u Cpound 5 pound

4 pound

osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO

CO C

o gtCO CM u ^ s m

g en

Tol

uene

-tig OO

11 o

V

Z

R

ecov

ery

i1o u 1 oo ^ oo

J

O

I 13 1^

bullB O 1

a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1

C O oO

i

V

amp0^ AfV o

ltigt

u R

aU CX

2 S

o -f^

re

tc

bulla

o

s oo o

(A

O u CM

3

^ o C3

5 a ea

u o =i e CA

m-O

O

5 Z pound a

gt CO o

laquo

e TJ lt

2 2 0) 1ampS W

~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M

c B CO bull llt CT) Cu

^ r0u u C3

u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy

2

1 u

Rkrj

111 V G^gt

6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO

a n campgt

U8 3 -g c amp

2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt

u 22

|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu

ufe 2 i bull= CO

^o ^ o CM CO QJ

S 5 gUa E

n lt Q ^ u -o

rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj

TT

oa - 2 6 -~

Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT

w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM

3

lt ^ o SO

eten

tion

i1

111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]

Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 7: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet VOASV - PestPCB

COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT

Organic Fractions

Missing Information Date Lab Contacted Date Received

Validator 6- 1 lAW^3 Date

1296

pound

u cs a

bullS9 8 5 5Q

1 iibullu u ^s cc re mdash C P

o C Te O

5 CJ 22 2

11| -7 T= deg ^ u mdash 5

= a bdquobull re

1311

10 (J bullmdash

llsl

u mdash u = h w fcu

Si U) IS) win

C3 O

5 C5 U

o ri

J o ST r

gt lt2-2 K

15mdash U a a u D

CO M

II

bullo o

Os 0gt ON

J5 _s 73

lt

o u to OJ

impo

und

Nn

bull3 bull8 tJ St= t

J3 S o

E To pound s E

co CO laquo

e

n _in

u u

c Cl it

Perf

onnn

iSlaquo Ogt i

C ^ Z bulls S s m

poun

d N

n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00

c o =3 CO

yen5 bull Js= _e

z I bullo

fj bullB

U

1 5 Ib i

spound F

c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W

y ee IZ = i telt J5

yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0

O bulliC a I I deg S | a

i rl

o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I

mo U^ ce

P 1 I amp

Vo

latil

e it

Per

forn

in

Sem

irola

tlle

^ w amp5 1 o

Q V) 5 o u

C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI

is

6

so

-fc o

ij13 Q

amp Si

V

trade U

c fO

c3 -2 e3 o

o

C3

es a i

^05

CC

es

u

2 O

S

Q a =u gt255

s5

1

^s bullC

G2O

ca

I Q

o

CO

n

CO

0

cs u

3 o

CO

^3

re

re

cs

CO

O

ei ca -a u

bulla

i

fc 2ipound

O u CO

bull3

oo 5

o3 a

bull o 53y 2

I 5

a 3 o U

o U

C =

II raquou 13

Jpound

re 5

bullI 3 5

gtraquoSlaquoa

S

5 h

TS 2

^12S

S

O

63

I I re

R

o o

55 G ogt

n en

C5 = OJ

TB U sectbull a s

a a

Jea

Si bull=

bull-bullbull-J

S 5

laquo C3

A C3 -J

-lt

bulls^bullc 52 B

bullI

Usect

aE

V

u ce Q

isectn-s raquou

e g

Ishy

=

lt

I U

rj K

o c iS o U

^ ca la en

R Ji amp a So

O U II

C55

CO

a O 5

S o

^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu

l a S

e

o U g

I

r O To^o a

u re H u u CO

CX bullg

o

TO

CA

Si 4)

O o

bulla

o a o u

CO 00 o

C8

V)

J3

U

u Lgt 5 5

U 0gt o 15

pound3 gt

s

u

u Cpound 5 pound

4 pound

osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO

CO C

o gtCO CM u ^ s m

g en

Tol

uene

-tig OO

11 o

V

Z

R

ecov

ery

i1o u 1 oo ^ oo

J

O

I 13 1^

bullB O 1

a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1

C O oO

i

V

amp0^ AfV o

ltigt

u R

aU CX

2 S

o -f^

re

tc

bulla

o

s oo o

(A

O u CM

3

^ o C3

5 a ea

u o =i e CA

m-O

O

5 Z pound a

gt CO o

laquo

e TJ lt

2 2 0) 1ampS W

~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M

c B CO bull llt CT) Cu

^ r0u u C3

u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy

2

1 u

Rkrj

111 V G^gt

6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO

a n campgt

U8 3 -g c amp

2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt

u 22

|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu

ufe 2 i bull= CO

^o ^ o CM CO QJ

S 5 gUa E

n lt Q ^ u -o

rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj

TT

oa - 2 6 -~

Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT

w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM

3

lt ^ o SO

eten

tion

i1

111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]

Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 8: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

pound

u cs a

bullS9 8 5 5Q

1 iibullu u ^s cc re mdash C P

o C Te O

5 CJ 22 2

11| -7 T= deg ^ u mdash 5

= a bdquobull re

1311

10 (J bullmdash

llsl

u mdash u = h w fcu

Si U) IS) win

C3 O

5 C5 U

o ri

J o ST r

gt lt2-2 K

15mdash U a a u D

CO M

II

bullo o

Os 0gt ON

J5 _s 73

lt

o u to OJ

impo

und

Nn

bull3 bull8 tJ St= t

J3 S o

E To pound s E

co CO laquo

e

n _in

u u

c Cl it

Perf

onnn

iSlaquo Ogt i

C ^ Z bulls S s m

poun

d N

n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00

c o =3 CO

yen5 bull Js= _e

z I bullo

fj bullB

U

1 5 Ib i

spound F

c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W

y ee IZ = i telt J5

yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0

O bulliC a I I deg S | a

i rl

o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I

mo U^ ce

P 1 I amp

Vo

latil

e it

Per

forn

in

Sem

irola

tlle

^ w amp5 1 o

Q V) 5 o u

C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI

is

6

so

-fc o

ij13 Q

amp Si

V

trade U

c fO

c3 -2 e3 o

o

C3

es a i

^05

CC

es

u

2 O

S

Q a =u gt255

s5

1

^s bullC

G2O

ca

I Q

o

CO

n

CO

0

cs u

3 o

CO

^3

re

re

cs

CO

O

ei ca -a u

bulla

i

fc 2ipound

O u CO

bull3

oo 5

o3 a

bull o 53y 2

I 5

a 3 o U

o U

C =

II raquou 13

Jpound

re 5

bullI 3 5

gtraquoSlaquoa

S

5 h

TS 2

^12S

S

O

63

I I re

R

o o

55 G ogt

n en

C5 = OJ

TB U sectbull a s

a a

Jea

Si bull=

bull-bullbull-J

S 5

laquo C3

A C3 -J

-lt

bulls^bullc 52 B

bullI

Usect

aE

V

u ce Q

isectn-s raquou

e g

Ishy

=

lt

I U

rj K

o c iS o U

^ ca la en

R Ji amp a So

O U II

C55

CO

a O 5

S o

^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu

l a S

e

o U g

I

r O To^o a

u re H u u CO

CX bullg

o

TO

CA

Si 4)

O o

bulla

o a o u

CO 00 o

C8

V)

J3

U

u Lgt 5 5

U 0gt o 15

pound3 gt

s

u

u Cpound 5 pound

4 pound

osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO

CO C

o gtCO CM u ^ s m

g en

Tol

uene

-tig OO

11 o

V

Z

R

ecov

ery

i1o u 1 oo ^ oo

J

O

I 13 1^

bullB O 1

a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1

C O oO

i

V

amp0^ AfV o

ltigt

u R

aU CX

2 S

o -f^

re

tc

bulla

o

s oo o

(A

O u CM

3

^ o C3

5 a ea

u o =i e CA

m-O

O

5 Z pound a

gt CO o

laquo

e TJ lt

2 2 0) 1ampS W

~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M

c B CO bull llt CT) Cu

^ r0u u C3

u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy

2

1 u

Rkrj

111 V G^gt

6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO

a n campgt

U8 3 -g c amp

2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt

u 22

|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu

ufe 2 i bull= CO

^o ^ o CM CO QJ

S 5 gUa E

n lt Q ^ u -o

rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj

TT

oa - 2 6 -~

Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT

w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM

3

lt ^ o SO

eten

tion

i1

111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]

Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 9: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

bullo o

Os 0gt ON

J5 _s 73

lt

o u to OJ

impo

und

Nn

bull3 bull8 tJ St= t

J3 S o

E To pound s E

co CO laquo

e

n _in

u u

c Cl it

Perf

onnn

iSlaquo Ogt i

C ^ Z bulls S s m

poun

d N

n U CJ ~ pound 5 trade trade ra -z s o CJ li| 00

c o =3 CO

yen5 bull Js= _e

z I bullo

fj bullB

U

1 5 Ib i

spound F

c W 2 5 U ^2 bd s 1 amp deg U E t-3 W

y ee IZ = i telt J5

yS o s laquo lt pound lt i a 0

O bulliC a I I deg S | a

i rl

o ^ i 1 1 Ic 2 I

mo U^ ce

P 1 I amp

Vo

latil

e it

Per

forn

in

Sem

irola

tlle

^ w amp5 1 o

Q V) 5 o u

C C p S u -x a So 3 1 JI

is

6

so

-fc o

ij13 Q

amp Si

V

trade U

c fO

c3 -2 e3 o

o

C3

es a i

^05

CC

es

u

2 O

S

Q a =u gt255

s5

1

^s bullC

G2O

ca

I Q

o

CO

n

CO

0

cs u

3 o

CO

^3

re

re

cs

CO

O

ei ca -a u

bulla

i

fc 2ipound

O u CO

bull3

oo 5

o3 a

bull o 53y 2

I 5

a 3 o U

o U

C =

II raquou 13

Jpound

re 5

bullI 3 5

gtraquoSlaquoa

S

5 h

TS 2

^12S

S

O

63

I I re

R

o o

55 G ogt

n en

C5 = OJ

TB U sectbull a s

a a

Jea

Si bull=

bull-bullbull-J

S 5

laquo C3

A C3 -J

-lt

bulls^bullc 52 B

bullI

Usect

aE

V

u ce Q

isectn-s raquou

e g

Ishy

=

lt

I U

rj K

o c iS o U

^ ca la en

R Ji amp a So

O U II

C55

CO

a O 5

S o

^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu

l a S

e

o U g

I

r O To^o a

u re H u u CO

CX bullg

o

TO

CA

Si 4)

O o

bulla

o a o u

CO 00 o

C8

V)

J3

U

u Lgt 5 5

U 0gt o 15

pound3 gt

s

u

u Cpound 5 pound

4 pound

osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO

CO C

o gtCO CM u ^ s m

g en

Tol

uene

-tig OO

11 o

V

Z

R

ecov

ery

i1o u 1 oo ^ oo

J

O

I 13 1^

bullB O 1

a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1

C O oO

i

V

amp0^ AfV o

ltigt

u R

aU CX

2 S

o -f^

re

tc

bulla

o

s oo o

(A

O u CM

3

^ o C3

5 a ea

u o =i e CA

m-O

O

5 Z pound a

gt CO o

laquo

e TJ lt

2 2 0) 1ampS W

~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M

c B CO bull llt CT) Cu

^ r0u u C3

u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy

2

1 u

Rkrj

111 V G^gt

6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO

a n campgt

U8 3 -g c amp

2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt

u 22

|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu

ufe 2 i bull= CO

^o ^ o CM CO QJ

S 5 gUa E

n lt Q ^ u -o

rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj

TT

oa - 2 6 -~

Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT

w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM

3

lt ^ o SO

eten

tion

i1

111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]

Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 10: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

so

-fc o

ij13 Q

amp Si

V

trade U

c fO

c3 -2 e3 o

o

C3

es a i

^05

CC

es

u

2 O

S

Q a =u gt255

s5

1

^s bullC

G2O

ca

I Q

o

CO

n

CO

0

cs u

3 o

CO

^3

re

re

cs

CO

O

ei ca -a u

bulla

i

fc 2ipound

O u CO

bull3

oo 5

o3 a

bull o 53y 2

I 5

a 3 o U

o U

C =

II raquou 13

Jpound

re 5

bullI 3 5

gtraquoSlaquoa

S

5 h

TS 2

^12S

S

O

63

I I re

R

o o

55 G ogt

n en

C5 = OJ

TB U sectbull a s

a a

Jea

Si bull=

bull-bullbull-J

S 5

laquo C3

A C3 -J

-lt

bulls^bullc 52 B

bullI

Usect

aE

V

u ce Q

isectn-s raquou

e g

Ishy

=

lt

I U

rj K

o c iS o U

^ ca la en

R Ji amp a So

O U II

C55

CO

a O 5

S o

^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu

l a S

e

o U g

I

r O To^o a

u re H u u CO

CX bullg

o

TO

CA

Si 4)

O o

bulla

o a o u

CO 00 o

C8

V)

J3

U

u Lgt 5 5

U 0gt o 15

pound3 gt

s

u

u Cpound 5 pound

4 pound

osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO

CO C

o gtCO CM u ^ s m

g en

Tol

uene

-tig OO

11 o

V

Z

R

ecov

ery

i1o u 1 oo ^ oo

J

O

I 13 1^

bullB O 1

a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1

C O oO

i

V

amp0^ AfV o

ltigt

u R

aU CX

2 S

o -f^

re

tc

bulla

o

s oo o

(A

O u CM

3

^ o C3

5 a ea

u o =i e CA

m-O

O

5 Z pound a

gt CO o

laquo

e TJ lt

2 2 0) 1ampS W

~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M

c B CO bull llt CT) Cu

^ r0u u C3

u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy

2

1 u

Rkrj

111 V G^gt

6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO

a n campgt

U8 3 -g c amp

2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt

u 22

|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu

ufe 2 i bull= CO

^o ^ o CM CO QJ

S 5 gUa E

n lt Q ^ u -o

rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj

TT

oa - 2 6 -~

Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT

w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM

3

lt ^ o SO

eten

tion

i1

111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]

Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 11: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

^s bullC

G2O

ca

I Q

o

CO

n

CO

0

cs u

3 o

CO

^3

re

re

cs

CO

O

ei ca -a u

bulla

i

fc 2ipound

O u CO

bull3

oo 5

o3 a

bull o 53y 2

I 5

a 3 o U

o U

C =

II raquou 13

Jpound

re 5

bullI 3 5

gtraquoSlaquoa

S

5 h

TS 2

^12S

S

O

63

I I re

R

o o

55 G ogt

n en

C5 = OJ

TB U sectbull a s

a a

Jea

Si bull=

bull-bullbull-J

S 5

laquo C3

A C3 -J

-lt

bulls^bullc 52 B

bullI

Usect

aE

V

u ce Q

isectn-s raquou

e g

Ishy

=

lt

I U

rj K

o c iS o U

^ ca la en

R Ji amp a So

O U II

C55

CO

a O 5

S o

^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu

l a S

e

o U g

I

r O To^o a

u re H u u CO

CX bullg

o

TO

CA

Si 4)

O o

bulla

o a o u

CO 00 o

C8

V)

J3

U

u Lgt 5 5

U 0gt o 15

pound3 gt

s

u

u Cpound 5 pound

4 pound

osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO

CO C

o gtCO CM u ^ s m

g en

Tol

uene

-tig OO

11 o

V

Z

R

ecov

ery

i1o u 1 oo ^ oo

J

O

I 13 1^

bullB O 1

a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1

C O oO

i

V

amp0^ AfV o

ltigt

u R

aU CX

2 S

o -f^

re

tc

bulla

o

s oo o

(A

O u CM

3

^ o C3

5 a ea

u o =i e CA

m-O

O

5 Z pound a

gt CO o

laquo

e TJ lt

2 2 0) 1ampS W

~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M

c B CO bull llt CT) Cu

^ r0u u C3

u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy

2

1 u

Rkrj

111 V G^gt

6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO

a n campgt

U8 3 -g c amp

2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt

u 22

|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu

ufe 2 i bull= CO

^o ^ o CM CO QJ

S 5 gUa E

n lt Q ^ u -o

rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj

TT

oa - 2 6 -~

Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT

w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM

3

lt ^ o SO

eten

tion

i1

111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]

Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 12: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

oo 5

o3 a

bull o 53y 2

I 5

a 3 o U

o U

C =

II raquou 13

Jpound

re 5

bullI 3 5

gtraquoSlaquoa

S

5 h

TS 2

^12S

S

O

63

I I re

R

o o

55 G ogt

n en

C5 = OJ

TB U sectbull a s

a a

Jea

Si bull=

bull-bullbull-J

S 5

laquo C3

A C3 -J

-lt

bulls^bullc 52 B

bullI

Usect

aE

V

u ce Q

isectn-s raquou

e g

Ishy

=

lt

I U

rj K

o c iS o U

^ ca la en

R Ji amp a So

O U II

C55

CO

a O 5

S o

^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu

l a S

e

o U g

I

r O To^o a

u re H u u CO

CX bullg

o

TO

CA

Si 4)

O o

bulla

o a o u

CO 00 o

C8

V)

J3

U

u Lgt 5 5

U 0gt o 15

pound3 gt

s

u

u Cpound 5 pound

4 pound

osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO

CO C

o gtCO CM u ^ s m

g en

Tol

uene

-tig OO

11 o

V

Z

R

ecov

ery

i1o u 1 oo ^ oo

J

O

I 13 1^

bullB O 1

a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1

C O oO

i

V

amp0^ AfV o

ltigt

u R

aU CX

2 S

o -f^

re

tc

bulla

o

s oo o

(A

O u CM

3

^ o C3

5 a ea

u o =i e CA

m-O

O

5 Z pound a

gt CO o

laquo

e TJ lt

2 2 0) 1ampS W

~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M

c B CO bull llt CT) Cu

^ r0u u C3

u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy

2

1 u

Rkrj

111 V G^gt

6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO

a n campgt

U8 3 -g c amp

2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt

u 22

|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu

ufe 2 i bull= CO

^o ^ o CM CO QJ

S 5 gUa E

n lt Q ^ u -o

rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj

TT

oa - 2 6 -~

Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT

w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM

3

lt ^ o SO

eten

tion

i1

111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]

Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 13: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

Ishy

=

lt

I U

rj K

o c iS o U

^ ca la en

R Ji amp a So

O U II

C55

CO

a O 5

S o

^=raquo bullso gtamplt S w re ltu

l a S

e

o U g

I

r O To^o a

u re H u u CO

CX bullg

o

TO

CA

Si 4)

O o

bulla

o a o u

CO 00 o

C8

V)

J3

U

u Lgt 5 5

U 0gt o 15

pound3 gt

s

u

u Cpound 5 pound

4 pound

osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO

CO C

o gtCO CM u ^ s m

g en

Tol

uene

-tig OO

11 o

V

Z

R

ecov

ery

i1o u 1 oo ^ oo

J

O

I 13 1^

bullB O 1

a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1

C O oO

i

V

amp0^ AfV o

ltigt

u R

aU CX

2 S

o -f^

re

tc

bulla

o

s oo o

(A

O u CM

3

^ o C3

5 a ea

u o =i e CA

m-O

O

5 Z pound a

gt CO o

laquo

e TJ lt

2 2 0) 1ampS W

~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M

c B CO bull llt CT) Cu

^ r0u u C3

u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy

2

1 u

Rkrj

111 V G^gt

6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO

a n campgt

U8 3 -g c amp

2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt

u 22

|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu

ufe 2 i bull= CO

^o ^ o CM CO QJ

S 5 gUa E

n lt Q ^ u -o

rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj

TT

oa - 2 6 -~

Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT

w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM

3

lt ^ o SO

eten

tion

i1

111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]

Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 14: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

u re H u u CO

CX bullg

o

TO

CA

Si 4)

O o

bulla

o a o u

CO 00 o

C8

V)

J3

U

u Lgt 5 5

U 0gt o 15

pound3 gt

s

u

u Cpound 5 pound

4 pound

osu 1 z a OS 2 S 1NO

CO C

o gtCO CM u ^ s m

g en

Tol

uene

-tig OO

11 o

V

Z

R

ecov

ery

i1o u 1 oo ^ oo

J

O

I 13 1^

bullB O 1

a u 2 _33 O 5 vtt Z73 ctf Ogt laquos ^OS N 5 imdashbull gt sC3Kre 1 cn lt O 1

C O oO

i

V

amp0^ AfV o

ltigt

u R

aU CX

2 S

o -f^

re

tc

bulla

o

s oo o

(A

O u CM

3

^ o C3

5 a ea

u o =i e CA

m-O

O

5 Z pound a

gt CO o

laquo

e TJ lt

2 2 0) 1ampS W

~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M

c B CO bull llt CT) Cu

^ r0u u C3

u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy

2

1 u

Rkrj

111 V G^gt

6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO

a n campgt

U8 3 -g c amp

2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt

u 22

|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu

ufe 2 i bull= CO

^o ^ o CM CO QJ

S 5 gUa E

n lt Q ^ u -o

rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj

TT

oa - 2 6 -~

Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT

w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM

3

lt ^ o SO

eten

tion

i1

111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]

Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 15: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

V

amp0^ AfV o

ltigt

u R

aU CX

2 S

o -f^

re

tc

bulla

o

s oo o

(A

O u CM

3

^ o C3

5 a ea

u o =i e CA

m-O

O

5 Z pound a

gt CO o

laquo

e TJ lt

2 2 0) 1ampS W

~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M

c B CO bull llt CT) Cu

^ r0u u C3

u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy

2

1 u

Rkrj

111 V G^gt

6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO

a n campgt

U8 3 -g c amp

2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt

u 22

|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu

ufe 2 i bull= CO

^o ^ o CM CO QJ

S 5 gUa E

n lt Q ^ u -o

rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj

TT

oa - 2 6 -~

Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT

w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM

3

lt ^ o SO

eten

tion

i1

111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]

Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 16: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

e TJ lt

2 2 0) 1ampS W

~ mdash bullmdash pound7 5 eu o laquobullbull cu o ^C M

c B CO bull llt CT) Cu

^ r0u u C3

u r- pound a 55 T3 Obullbull ^^ 4gt p e u u rshy

2

1 u

Rkrj

111 V G^gt

6 sect 0 I en U deg^ ^ CO

a n campgt

U8 3 -g c amp

2 bull- w o 5 gt -r ampgt

u 22

|i 1laquo 2 3 0 a trade o deg g uu

ufe 2 i bull= CO

^o ^ o CM CO QJ

S 5 gUa E

n lt Q ^ u -o

rU t f -sas bulllt laquo mdashj

TT

oa - 2 6 -~

Z g = Eu X CO g i E FT

w bull CO 2 mdash H ( bull WM

3

lt ^ o SO

eten

tion

i1

111SZ - lt Ci t_ V]

Z j pound2 S2 mdash) o^bull^iJ i H gtbull C5 raquo r bullbull

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 17: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

so u

3 nsectre

U a

c u u

Co

ra

on

e o

re

re

O U

U CO a

J 73

a 5

U

tt

Q Q

a CO

x 2 U

^OCO

- s CJ

73 U O

laquo rt j OS laquo Q Blaquo H = 2

ltI mdash 03

s s Q

u2 55 en

Par

ame

Com

pou

2S ra C8

12 t5 CO 13 ugt

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 18: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

s V~7 h 7

e cr

iteria

mdashi

g f e IBt amp5

Ja lt3f

CO a o O5 X

Ol 8 E ex s bullj

o Qla CO

^o vf S poundJ 03 3

Is amp3 VO

n0) CO bullbull

aC TO 1)

a n O j CO 0 0 ^

mdash bullbull

S ogt bulla o a

H mdash a J eo sgt CO bullmdash o J5 lty lO ^ Q e w 5 E

CO 2 o pound2 pound2

JL) 3 laquo 4gt a pound tn

Z C ZU poundgt JLgt re2 -5 C3 1J cr If)

00 laquo K _O

u M O TEL 3Q bulla

u Qu s ~h ^ in o

lt7i Ix y ^ O i S-S iS

CM UV

a I 13ki 0

t sCfl laquo1

3

fr io

Qft s laquo E = u

bull z bl 4gt e a oSo lt2 CQ

oo

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 19: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

zzzz ZZZ

S raquoltgt JBgtltgtgtltgtlaquo 75 lt Q

U ltcc

poundJ1) 5C

_c OJ

u_ ul ^ O

KO CK

ult | i

IS O

ulsl

clM 4 XN5 - 1 1 bullg

^ 5 Uc O a u mdash-^^bullo u ^ lt^gt1 Jgt

re S o lt 5 2 2 | inft) OJ

EL C8laquo 1 ~ iQ- V^ (O raquo^ sbulln g

O ff ( 2 laquo VJo laquo v cjfT 0 r4 O ai

Q A 1^1 a 2 Jy03 KJ g UshyS laquo C3bull laquo B bullbullbull S o

bulllaquo L^

u u bulls i 1s S bullE_O eo S fid pound ^ C raquoBE

3 spound

_ mdash w ulo igt il re mdash 0^0 w ltamplaquo3 gt ^ QSj W o H bullS=SSsS o sect P-3^

ltH 35-o feLCX-Se amp uK 5raquocjre C

and

or degsect

1IfII 82(3 u t w crlaquo

^ 5 S

1 5 s M s ^ 3 -O W gt^ rf jrraquo poundpound s co W TQQ1 =Si

^shylaquolaquoR J3poundbullso5 a bull 11 1

laquo I HiwS ipound

= r^ 3 -act J ~pound^

-^shySAgt ampbull c laquobull 15 -bullbull S 5ft 4gt^ ^^ U bullpoundpound bullg

j-O

os mdash

1sect5Exgt^ o Stfx

t1 1Itlaquo E bullraquo laquo S fraquo o oSv t0lshyU CQ CO flaquol3 poundj j2EJS-O2

bull5 2si^ -3 = W laquopoundVQa ^ j Slaquo i_l _1 cOSJbulla w -deg o pound O1 S = sglmdash o bdquo- gt c c A 2 i S-S8 5 $ li^cS _J J= to 0ltE co

j3 O ra 3bullbullbull C3 co ^ tab laquolaquo J_ i ugt bullsect 3 |8laquo IS 0 i gt- u imdashJ jo CO 1 U bullJS bullg

gtJ QJ bullbullbullo a Q = r- c o -a tio pound us 5 5lt X eu -5 C t- V | s U laquobull bdquoamp - laquo f8o cd -o i o e4MI ltM^ W^ 1^tC

bull3 M C laquo8S U aS 5 | |So- 5 gt

i S i amp bullSO gt g- Sg-JQ u v^ 8 pound sg

bull= S D-g^

^1 | sect it^ J^ spound laquo s laquo (fbulls pound gt mdash e1mdash c E 3 t^ r- -^ _= vi -^ laquoM4 ^ bull O bull E x_ poundbull bullmdash ^MQamp H laquo laquobdquo S3 -J w

1 bull ^ C2 - 7 ^M J irb co rlaquou laquojg ltD 22 laquo co laquog o - reg laquo ogtlaquo _K ~Ugt Z J ffiQ^U 1 5 Q -g ZQ^ j O

ZEpound Cd COs C8 --lt Ci slts ^ 2c bull= ^ _2 VBj Q re re

ygt X bull bull bull bull S3 ^ bull bull bull CO

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 20: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

Z

fc

bull

cJgt ~

Up

HZlt

D Z ^ )

O pound3

S z o bull3 u

1lt

iSZ

u CO

S s O

U H |

i d 2

^ S

_re C u

ubullo

-

CO poundbull2 CM

ss W o amp CO o Z

docoS2bullJUH

shy

^ H Z O U Q Z

gt DO o e CO

on 0)

Is -8 SCO bull2 co gpg

fii

1lt5 1

v

mdasho

S

85ltj=60 _

33

cZ

iu

S e to co

S CO

laquo cc

ij

4gt

E 2 CO Cu

tJ

O U

-^ ^mdash

y( gtigt=^

shyH

s s1 i^ D

bulli

~ O

1 2 rjj O

I o cs o

bull5 5 a

^ ^ J 2

CoCu

U

to W

^o B

S a

5c OJ

f^^ o

^c _raquolt

S

|gtlt

i shyA^Vr

i

j

uoCJ

CO

COs

u o

t-gt CO

^s O) bull5 s laquo tmdash lt

CJ

cc

O

O M

3 x a U gt O laquo tS

21 U Pshy

R S

I

u Cs9

U

U

1 U u

ISJ COlt U

b

Q CO

i en

1gt

2

i Cu

0

ec i

O

ca 5

o E pound lt

o

o H

bbulls 1 pound

jraquo fc3^

II

4032

^ ^

AS

sect

1 lto 00

raquo

IIO0Zltu j^j

ltw lt^SHuz08bullSo^P fij ffbull CJCu co 5S ^

poundbraquo-iltgH

Ht255

bull o

lt

w-S a

sect1 =bullsect gb j j^ ft flgt gt

o o rrj deg

c o o^(

H i23

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 21: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

o cgt

I2 ci

re ltu Q CW

W gt

bulla gt

ET o ea

o V re

JO

re

u

a a

opoundshy

o u

fi

s

en

a

o U

cs en

CO

13

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 22: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

4 OCL

y o

18re kin bullmdash

gtbull ~Obull0

CT O blaquo SD

u S ^ gtNi

bulllaquo o ^

315 ^mdash mdash re -3 gt

reu pound

ii ce Q

1175 pound ^~ 7 pound Sc r K g pound bullpoundC c jki laquo 0 0

o shy0 amp V n ~ S-S _S a mdash mdashbull laquoo 5 n bdquo deg bullillsectS deg is~l

shy

i CB

1 5

1 ^bullbull

^^fc

^^f~+

w

sectbull 5 5 ja o shy 2 s

pound ~ ra e _laquodeg t5 e

bulla laquo 2u u mdash C ^ S c 0 -s pound^ 5laquoj cshy a shy S 3 u pound o sect 5 JJ

1|S5 laquore mdash deg bullraquo 8 S S u O O bulldeg shy -o gti s

v^c

C^~

N ^shy

^ lt

^ S5 laquoo

^L ^3

x

-~-gt

^_^

u1)bulli ^ lt shyo

S 8 o poundbull mdashamp= -ou ashyc u wo bullshy gto w bullshypound slaquon bull en U o w Si

i = 5 i rr s e x deg

degS6^ Slt^ shy5 shyshy

reo M raquogt2

V^shy

ltbullc^

bull8 H g 1 sect 2i 2 Ss i ^ fc laquo pound gsectS g rf-a-s 5i gtlt sect U s sSB D ^|pound s-gbulllaquo u a s lt ta 5 gtalt 7 u jgt E i BH js u a 7 3

255 ^ e O sect S C

C 8 f t gt f t E z laquo C raquo gtQamp s e e 2 ^a 3 shy e S K Sraquo ^4 laquo) C ftj x u)

11 1 IliJltlaquo S ^ S o aO 3 a s a o c

to

Ogt

o

famp

U

fts

gt

sectbulla

^

tpound c

x 2 J

bullc 3amp

sect5 3

1 i 11 S u | |3 51 1 1 1 J 1 1 ft ft fti5 o K z laquo

i J

1 i i a t S u |

o o gt I sectgt

1mill1 1 iii

V

r^^

O ec 12

tigt X laquoSii Q S= gt

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 23: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

4J

Vj^

CQbulla co

CO

at w gt ^ 2pound5

^1

U H

Ot

o u o

zEd

u gt H

S Z

P gt X

u

c JU o pound COtn

u CO

-

B O U

00

ggt

u H laquon u

bull3 ltij

o ON lts

J3 U

CO

Q

u o

bulla 3

g o U

Par

amet

er

| 3 z v 5

CO CO

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 24: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

ks e

ezzzz l_ b U U o o o o

is in lt

I o

bullg bullCO

u

gen1 bulla

o DEL ^ E

5 o u

2 K H Uu U

U a en

3 81 gt1 C

1QJ

bulla g- 4J

tf

C ^ iC CJ

E

cr O t) 2 K bullM3

o w bullo o S S CO l4_

CLi bull- 2i i 5uCQ

E Ocd o C V ltU^3 u e

Vs r S O laquo

c 13

is||03 aj e bull-lt uC C mdash tgt C eu pound JS y=-j=

w-Sl-8 shyIs SS-5 laquo rO c a K plusmnraquo 1 El-s sect e o~ 7 a- =5 ^lt

5uD 1 1-S1laquo MUN cu ^ w o u O t- mdashlaquo

u w o1 ~ u - ^t

fo -j S3

vCQ ^

I 1S3 0 t t- -mdash CO

CO lt )

^raquo CQ 0 mdash o ogt u Q ra

i a a OU

C^^ g-6 O o ^^ 255

1 laquo a CO -^ laquo JO ai U

bullo bull X 5 u 73

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 25: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

REGION I Site Data Review Worksheets Reference Number4Qni--Olt

REGION I REVIEW OT INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) lvw i llYlxflrftJKVldata package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data sunnarized The data review included

Case No SAS No Sampling Date(s) SDG No 3 VI Matrix 1-fcjT) Shipping Date(s)

~No of Samples fa Date Recd by Lab

Traffic Report Nos

Trip Blank No Equipment Blank No _ Field Dup Nos

SOW No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EXSLshyLV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

-Data Completeness -Field Duplicates -Holding Tines -Lab Control Sample Results -Calibrations -Furnace AA Results -Blanks -ICP Serial Dilution Results -ICP Interference Check Results -Detection Limit Results -Matrix Spike Recoveries -Sample Quantitation -Laboratory Duplicates

Overall Cements

Definitions and Qualifiers

A - Acceptable data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected

Reviewer Date

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 26: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

X DATA COMPLETENESS

KISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATE RECD

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 27: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

II HOLDING TIKES Complete table for all camples and circle the analysis date for camples not within criteria

HC CYANIDE OTHERS ACTION SAMPLE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ID SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

5amp01D 6

1

YS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION

ACTION 1 If holding tines are exceeded all positive results are

estimated (J) and non-detects are estimated (UJ)

2 If holding tines are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 28: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

REG I OK X Data Review worksheets

I Z X A INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)

1 Recovery Criteria laquo raquo

List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration

PATE ICVCCVI ANALYTE ACTION SAMPLES ATTFrTrn

ACTIONS

If any analyte does not meet the tR criteria follow the actions stated be1 ow

For Positive Results

Accent Estimate Relect fRi

Metals 90-110R 75-891R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-120R 65-79IR 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115IR 70-84IR 116-130IR lt701R gt130IR

For Non-detected Results

Accept Estinute rUJl Reject fRi

Metals 90-125IR 75-69R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-135IR 65-79IR lt65IRf gt135R Cyanide 85-130R 70-84IR lt70R M301R

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 29: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)

2 Analytical Sequence

A Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW ycesor No

B Were calibrations performed at the beginning of ~~^ or No each analysis CYcx

C Were calibration standards analyzed at the beshyginning of sample analysis and at a minimun freshyquency of ten percent or every two hours during sr~ analysis whichever is more frequent (Yes)or No

D Were the correlation coefficients for the callshybration curves for AA Hg and CN gt 0995 Yes or Nc

E Was a standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes or No

If No

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to deternre the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly DISCJSS any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 30: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

REGION Z Data Review Worksheet

IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)

List the blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water blanks

1 Laboratory Blanks MATRIX

DATE TCBCCB PREP BL ANALYTE CONCUNTTS

3Mfc fc

L 715-

2 EquipmentTrip Blanks

DATE EQUIP BLlaquo ANALYTE CONCUNITS

3 Frequency Requirements

A Was a preparation blank analyzed for each itatrix for every 20 samples and for each digestion batch or No

B Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent esj or No

If No

The data nay be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 31: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

XV B BLXNX XNXLY6I8 RESULTS (Section 4

4 Blank Actions

The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five tines the highest concentration of that elements contanination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should be multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows

1 when the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U

2 When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration ungualified

MATRIX MATRIX

ELEMENT MAX CONC AL ELEMENT MAX CONC AL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS

NOTE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to nigkg in order to compare then with the sample results

Cone in ugL X Volume diluted to fZOOmll X 1L_ X lOOOem X Imo - mgkg Weight digested (Igram ) 1000ml 1kg lOOOug

Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 32: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V X JCP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 2 )

i Recovery Criteria

List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not Beet the criteria for R

^

DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS

If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated be1ov

PERCENT RECOVERY lt50I 50-79 gt120

Positive Sample ResultsNon-detected Sample Results

R R

J UJ

J A

2 Frequency Requirements

Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes or No

If no

The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 33: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

V B XCP INTERFERENCE CHECK 6XKPLE (Section 3)

3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ics A solution gt 2xIDL that should not be present

ELEMENT CONC DETECTED CONC OF INTERFERENTS IN THE ICS IN THE ICS

AL CA FE KG

Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the sarpl es affected by interferences below

SAMPLE ELEMENT SAMPLE SAMPLE INTERFERENT ESTIMATED AFFECTED AFFECTED CONC CONC INTERF

(ugL) AL CA FE laquoG (ugL)

ACTIONS

1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of Al Ca Fe and Kg are less than 501 of their respective levels in the ICS solution

2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 501 or more of that in the ICS solution

3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element

4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect

Give explanations for any actions taken below

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 34: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VI KATRIX 8PIKZ

TR I MATRIX

1 Recovery Criteria

List the percent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria

S - amount of spike added SSR - spikes sample result SR - saople result

Analyte SSR SR IR Action

Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS bullbullbull hi 1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a

factor of 4 or more no action is taken

2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below

PERCENT RECOVERY OOt 30-74 gt1S

Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

Frequency Criteria

A Was a matrix spike prepared at the required freshyquency yes or No

B Was a post digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not Beet required criteria for matrix spike recovery yes or No

A separate worksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 35: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

VIX LABORATORY DUPLICATES

MATRIX Element CRDL

water soil Sattmlg EEC

Aluminua raquo9kg

AntimonyArsenic Barium BerylliumCadmium Calcium Chrottiiia Cobalt CopperIron Lead MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiunT ThalliUn Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

ShdegUld -PP- to an other samples of

ACTIONS

Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt35I for soils

If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 36: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

REGION I Data Review Worksheets

VIII FIELD DUPLICATES

List the concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in ngXg using the sample weight

bullvolume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evalute the precision by circling either the RPD or CRDL for each element

MATRIX Element CEPi

water soil

AluminumugL

200 raquogkg

AntimonyArsenic

60~ 10

Barium 200_ Beryllium 5~ Cadmiun 5 Calcium 5000~ Chrorciua ~ 10~~ Cobalt 50~ Copper 2S~ Iron 100 Lead laquo Magnesiua Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver SodiuD Thallium Vanadiutc Zinc Cyanide j I

Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type

ACTIONS 7] _ _ _ _(MAJL ^t 1CJU K flMs ^06

1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt50t for soils

2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive suits raquonrt ( T I T n n n d n f n r t n r l resul ts for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL f4vr-Dnr for soils) lf both sargtples flrc non - -bull i_jmdashbull r

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 37: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

REGIOH Z Data Review Worksheets

IX LABORATORY COKTROL BXKPLE

1 Aqueous LCS

List any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected

DATE ELEMENT 1pound ACTION CAMPLES AFFECTFJ

2 Solid LCS

List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The 80-120 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results

ELEMENT LCS CONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

ACTIONS Percent Recovery

AQUEOUS LCS ltSO Sl-79 gt120t

Positive Results R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

SOLID LCS ltEPA Control Windows raquoEPA Control Windows

Positive Results J J Non-detected Results UJ A

3 Frequency Criteria

A Was an LCS analyzed for every matrix every digestion batch and every 20 samples Yes or No

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 38: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS

1 Duplicate Precision

Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were pershyformed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within 201

Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn 20 for samples elements

2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries

Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples

Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following sampleselements

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when conshytractually required

_ Correlation coefficients gt0995 accept results _ Correlation coefficients lt0995 for sample numberselements _

Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as reshyqujjred for sampleselements _

ACTIONS^ffJt^J tf

1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside i 20 RSD or CV

2 If the sample absorbance is lt50l of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied

PERCENT RECOVERY lt10raquo Ilt-84 gt11SI

Positive Sample Results J or R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A

3 Esticate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed

4 Estinate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 39: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

- - -- -

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASKA (ICP) BURIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted cample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within lot for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution

Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ZCP serial dilution analysis

MATRIX_

ELEMENT IDL 50XIDL SAMPLE SERIAL 0 ACTION RESULT DILUTION

AlurinuE Bariun BerylliumCadriun Calciuzc Chrorciuni Cobalt CopperIron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium -

-Silver Sodium 1 - - bull Vanadium

-Zinc bull-shy

Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix

ACTIONS

1 Estimate (J) positive results if ID gt15

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 40: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

REGION X Data Review Worksheets

X X X DETECTION LXKXT RESDLT8

1 Instrument Detection Limits

Instrument Detection Liait results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

A rr IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI

the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes or No

IDLs were present but thefollowing elements_

criteria was not met for the _______

2 Reporting Requirements

were sample results on Fora I reported down to

Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes or Ko - ~~fi-i QLWA$M-UgtA_Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes or No ^m- fyiwuuj Ad fe

If No

The reported results may be inaccurate Hake the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 41: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

REGION Z Data Review Worksheets

XXIX 6XMPLE OOXKTITATJON

cslculation

ZURNACE

MERCURY

CYANIDE

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample conshycentrations (mgkg)

The lab is required to use 1 gran sample (wet weight) to 200 ml Wet weight concentration

digest cone in us x200ml X X X JjSa laquo Braquog L 9raquo 1000 ml

lOOOug kg arc

the

raquo - laquolaquo concentrtion drywelht Bgkg)

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE

Page 42: ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · Oihcr; V^_11L__«, ENSAFE INC. ENVIRONMENTA AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . L. 5724 Summer Trees Drive • Memphis. Tennessee 38134

FJGURE 9 Rtfion

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO Mllife

LABORATORY M L-tkampM CA7 - NO OF SAMPL ES I MATRIX

SDG OdegI REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD) _AVampTlL^o

SOW REVIEWERS NAME U

DPO ACTION FYI COMPLETION DATE_IQJ t

PATA A laquoP^MFNT SUMMARY

ICP A A H| CYANIDE

1 HOLDING TIMES O

2 CALIBRATIONS

3 BLANKS

ltbull O 5 LCS O

6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

7 MATRIX SPIKE O

I MSA Q

9 SERIAL DILUTION

10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION

II OTHER QC

12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT X

O Data hid eo probltmior qualified due to cioor problem M bull Data quaJifilaquo5 dve to major problems Z bull Data unacceptable X bull Problems but do aot affect data

ACTION ITEMS

AREAS OF CONCERN

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE