enriching instr for strug read - edlt 200 co1 - course syllabus

Upload: continuing-education-at-the-university-of-vermont

Post on 05-Apr-2018

228 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    1/22

    P a g e | 1

    Course Syllabus

    Enriching Instruction for Struggling Readers3 credits

    Lynn Mazza

    Thursday evenings 4:00-6:45 pm

    Location: Union Memorial School, Colchester

    Course Description:

    This course will provide educators with research-based instructional strategies which areeffective in teaching struggling learners in their classroom and in supplemental instructional

    programs. Participants will review the underlying basics of good reading instruction, and learn

    how to tailor instruction for the child who is having the most difficulty learning and applyinggood reading strategies. All teachers have children in their programs who are more difficult to

    teach than others. This course will provide practical strategies for research-based instruction to

    help those students become fluent and engaged readers. This course will focus heavily on the

    application of professional readings, reflections and small group discussion.

    Goals:

    1.) To learn or review the underlying methods for good literacy instruction.2.) To learn how to target instruction for struggling learners.3.) To develop a program or utilize good literacy practices for all learners, but with a special

    focus on the struggling learner.

    Learning Outcomes:

    As a result of active participation in this course, students will be able to:

    1.) Identify and implement research-based methods of good literacy instruction.2.) Identify struggling learners in the classroom.3.) Develop a program and/or lessons based on the individual needs of the student.4.) Incorporate good instructional practices in literacy instruction and differentiate this

    instruction based on the needs of the learner.5.) Learn the components of a quality literacy program for struggling learners.

    General Course Information

    Course Policies:

    Students will need to work with a student or group of students in a chosen grade K-4 in order toapply the knowledge they obtain during class time.

    Attendance Expectations:Course participants are expected to attend and participate in each class (Total 37.5 hours)More

    than two unexcused absences will result in failure of the course. The official policy for excused

    absences for religious holidays: Students have the right to practice the religion of their choice.

    Each semester students should submit in writing to their instructors by the end of the second full

    week of classes their documented religious holiday schedule for the semester. Faculty must

    permit students who miss work for their purpose of religious observance to make up this work.

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    2/22

    P a g e | 2

    Contributions in Class:Class members will participate in discussions in class as part of whole and small groups.

    Discussions are intended to deepen understanding of literacy instructional methods, identify the

    needs of the struggling learner, and help develop a quality literacy program for these students.

    Class members will also be asked to share their own materials, lessons, and knowledge theypreviously had, as well as new materials, lessons, and knowledge they gain through this course to

    enhance the learning of other members. In-class readings and reflections, as well as small group

    discussions will enhance these learning opportunities.

    Academic Honesty & Professionalism:

    All students are required to be familiar with and adhere to the Academic Honesty PolicyProcedures found athttp://www.umv.edu/~dosa/handbook/.

    Required and/or recommended readings:

    Required Texts:Johnson, Pat & Keier, Katie (2010). Catching Readers Before They Fall: Supporting Readers

    Who Struggle, K-4. Portland Maine: Stenhouse Publishers.

    Lyon, Carol A. (2003). Teaching Struggling Readers: How to Use Brain Research to Maximize

    Learning. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann

    Required Articles:

    Darling, Sharon (2005). Strategies for Engaging Parents in Home Support of ReadingAcquisition. The Reading Teacher. 58:5,476-479.

    Feazell, Victoria S. (2004). Reading Acceleration Program: A Schoolwide Intervention. The

    Reading Teacher. 58:1, 66-72.

    Hudson, Roxanne F. & High, Leslie, et. al (2007). Dyslexia and the Brain: What Does Current

    Research Tell Us? The Reading Teacher. 60:61, 506-515.

    Kuhn, Melanie (2004). Helping Students Become Accurate, Expressive Readers: Fluency

    Instruction for Small Groups. The Reading Teacher. 58:4, 338-343.

    McKenna, Michael C. & Picard, Michelle Cournoyer (2006). Revisiting the Role of Miscue

    Analysis in Effective Teaching. The Reading Teacher. 60:4, 378-380.

    Mesmer, Heidi Anne E. & Griffith, Priscilla L. (2005). Everybodys Selling ItBut Just What

    is Explicit, Systematic Phonics Instruction? The Reading Teacher. 59:4, 366-376.

    Peebles, Jodi L. (2007). Incorporating Movement with Fluency Instruction: A Motivation for

    Struggling Readers. The Reading Teaacher. 60:6, 578-581.

    http://www.umv.edu/~dosa/handbook/http://www.umv.edu/~dosa/handbook/http://www.umv.edu/~dosa/handbook/http://www.umv.edu/~dosa/handbook/
  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    3/22

    P a g e | 3

    Pilonieta, Paola & Medina, Adriana L. (2009). Reciprocal Teaching for the Primary Grades: We

    Can Do It, Too! The Reading Teacher. 63:2, 120-129.

    OR

    Myers, Pamela, Ann (2005). The Princess Storyteller, Clara Clarifier, Quincy Questioner, and

    the Wizard: Reciprocal Teaching Adapted for Kindergarten Students. The Reading Teacher.59:4, 314-324.

    Raphael, Taffy & Au, Kathryn H. (2005). QAR: Enhancing Comprehension and Test TakingAcross Grades and Content Areas. The Reading Teacher. 59:3, 206-221

    Rasinski, Timothy & Rupley, William H., et. al (2008). Two Essential Ingredients: Phonics andFluency Getting to Know Each Other. The Reading Teacher. 62:3, 257-260.

    Scharlach, Tabatha Dobson (2008). START Comprehending: Students and Teachers Actively

    Reading Text. The Reading Teacher. 62:1,20-31.

    Smith, Melinda & Walker, Barabara J., et. al (2004). From Phonological Awareness to Fluency

    in Each Lesson. The Reading Teacher. 58:3, 302-307.

    Stricklin, Kelley (2011). Hands-On Reciprocal Teaching: A Comprehension Technique. The

    Reading Teacher. 64:8, 620-625.

    Wanzek, Jeanne & Bursuck, Bill, et. al. (2003). Evaluating the Suitability of Phonological

    Awareness Programs for Children Who Are at Risk. Teaching Exceptional Children. 35:4, 28-

    34.

    Recommended Texts:

    Allington, Richard L. (2006). What Really Matters for Struggling Readers: Designing Research-

    Based Programs, Second Edition. Boson, MA: Pearson. (chapters 4, 5, 6 required)

    Bear, Donald R. & Invernizzi, Marcia et al. (2004). Words Their Way: Word Study of Phonics,Vocabulary, and Spelling Instruction: 3

    rdEdition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson

    Education.

    Clay, Marie M. (2005).An Observation Survey of Early Literacy Achievement: Second Edition.

    Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann. (chapter 5 required)

    Collins, Kathy (2004). Growing Readers. Portland, Maine: Stenhouse Publishing. (chapters 5, 6

    required)

    Cooper, J. David & Chard, David J. et. al (2006). The Struggling Reader: Interventions thatWork. New York, New York: Scholastic. (chapter 3 required)

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    4/22

    P a g e | 4

    Dorn, Linda J. & Soffos, Carla (2012).Intervention that Works: A Comprehensive Intervention

    Model for Preventing Reading Failure in Grades K-3. Boston, Ma: Pearson Education Inc.

    Miller, Debbie (2002).Reading With Meaning. Portland, Maine: Stenhouse Publishing.

    OConnor, Rollanda E. (2007). Teaching Word Recognition: Effective Strategies for Studentswith Learning Difficulties. New York, New York: Guilford Press.

    Oczkus, L.D. (2010).Reciprocal Teaching at Work. Newark, DE: International ReadingAssociation.

    Opitz, Michael F. & Rasinski, Timothy (1998). Good-Bye Round Robin: 25 Effective Oral

    Reading Strategies. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.

    Rasinski, Timothy. (2011). The Fluent Reader. New York, New York: Scholastic.

    Rasinski, Timothy & Padak, Nancy. (2005). 3-Minute Reading Assessments: Word Recognition,Fluency, and Comprehension. New York, New York: Scholastic.

    Raphael, Taffy E. & Highfield, Kathy et al. (2006). QAR Now. New York, New York,

    Scholastic.

    Scanlon, Donna M. (2010).Early Interventions for Reading Difficulties. New York, New York:

    Guilford Press.

    Shaywitz, Sally. (2003). Overcoming Dyslexia. New York, New York, Vintage Books, a divisionof Random House.

    Strickland, Dorothy S. (2011). Teaching Phonics Today: Word Study Strategies Through the

    Grades (second edition). International Reading Association. (chapter 5 required.)

    Recommended Articles:

    Boyd-Batstone, Paul (2004). Focused Anecdotal Records Assessment: A tool for Standard-

    Based, Authentic Assessment. The Reading Teacher.58:3, 230-239.

    Pardo, Laura S. (2004). What Every Teacher Needs to Know About Comprehension. The

    Reading Teacher. 58:3, 272-280.

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    5/22

    P a g e | 5

    Student Evaluation/Assessment

    Grading:Grading will follow UVM guidelines. See scoring rubrics.

    Format for Expected Work:-Journal Entries will be 3-5 pages in length, double spaced, Times New Roman.

    -Shares from the students classroomwill be the students choice, depending on the topic.

    -The project will be presented in a 3-ring binder, clearly sectioned off. There will be a sectionfor assessments, lesson plans, artifacts, and reflection/evaluation. This binder will also include

    handouts, articles, and journal entries given in class. This must also be sectioned off by a

    component of literacy, assessments, and miscellaneous information.

    Scoring Rubrics:

    Participation (10 points)During class and for homework students will try many of the instructional activities introduced

    on that day and engage in discussions on their experiences. Other discussions revolving aroundthe concepts taught in class will be necessary. This ensures students will have a working

    knowledge of instructional practices useful for the struggling learner. Students will also be asked

    on occasion to share information they may have from their own experiences. Students mustregularly attend classes in order to benefit from these class discussions, readings, and journaling.

    Observation by the instructor will be used to note class participation, and students will also be

    asked to self-evaluate at both the middle and the end of the course:

    0-2 points 3-5 points 6-8 points 9-10 pointsNo class

    participation or more

    than two absences.

    Occasionally

    contributes, but is

    frequently

    unprepared or off

    topic. One absence.

    Participates

    occasionally, and

    shares a few ideas.

    No absences.

    Fully participates,

    shares information

    willingly, and

    occasionally takes a

    leadership role. No

    absences.

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    6/22

    P a g e | 6

    Readings and Journal Entries (30 points)

    Teachers or reading must be fluent readers and be able to gather information for their purposes.There will be numerous reading done in and outside of class in order to tap into the vast

    information available by the most prominent researchers in the field of reading. A 3-ring binder

    must be kept with required articles and corresponding journal entries. Each section will be

    tabbed and clearly marked. Journal entries will be turned in at the start of the following class,and graded as follows. Each entry can receive up to 30 points, and the weekly entries will be

    averaged for the final total.

    0-4 points 5-9 points 10-14 points 15-19 points 20-24 points 25-30 points

    Journal entries

    are off topic and

    are not well

    written. Many

    spelling and

    grammaticalerrors.

    Journal entries

    stay on topic, but

    there are many

    spelling and

    grammatical

    errors.

    Journal entries

    are on topic, but

    they show

    marginal thought

    beyond the

    required topic.There are few

    spelling or

    grammatical

    errors.

    Entries show

    some reflection

    on the students

    current practices

    and ideas on

    reading, as wellas reflection on

    class discussion.

    There are little to

    no spelling or

    grammatical

    errors.

    Entries show

    understanding of

    the topics

    presented in class

    as well as the

    readings.Participant is

    thoughtful and

    reflective of their

    own practices as

    well as class

    discussion. Entries

    are presented in a

    clear, concise way,

    with little to no

    spelling or

    grammatical errors.

    Journal entries are also

    well organized in

    thought, and are

    written in an

    interesting tone and

    voice. Ideas areexpressed in a clear,

    concise way, with

    deep, thoughtful

    reflections on the

    students own

    practices and ideas

    presented in the

    readings and class

    discussions. There are

    little to no spelling or

    grammatical errors.

    Notebook Organized and Complete (10 points)

    0-4 points 5-7 points 8-10 pointsBinder is not clearly tabbed with

    each section categorized, and some

    journal entries are missing.

    Binder is clearly organized with

    tabbed sections, but all journal

    entries are inserted.

    Binder is clearly organize with each

    section tabbed, and all journal

    entries are accounted for and in the

    right section.

    Student Literacy Portfolio (30 points)The project consists of working with one child who will be chosen based on assessments. There

    are 3 parts: 1.) Information gathering and data collection, 2.) a plan of action, and 3.) theimplementation of the instructional intervention. The information gathering and data collection

    will include assessments and trial lessons based on each classes focus. The plan of action will bejournal reflections based on the trial lessons, and the implantation will allow the student to take

    one area of focus and develop lessons for the child. This project will be kept in the same binder

    as the professional articles and journal entries. It will also be clearly tabbed according to the 3parts. Project will be graded as a whole, with the grade reflecting all three components.

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    7/22

    P a g e | 7

    0-5 points 6-11 points 12-17 points 18-23 points 24-30 points

    Project is incomplete

    and missing at least

    one main

    component.

    Project is missing a

    main component, but

    other components

    are well-organizedand contribute to the

    childs learning.

    Project has all

    components, but

    lessons and

    reflections are notwell thought out.

    Project has all

    components, and

    lessons and

    reflections are wellthought out and in

    keeping with the

    struggling learners

    profile as displayed

    through assessments.

    Project has all

    components and is

    well organized.

    Lessons andreflections are

    thoughtful, and

    additional insight is

    added. Growth is

    shown by learner

    through on-going

    assessments and

    lessons are planned

    accordingly.

    Presentation of Project along with smaller presentations during semester (20 points)There will be several opportunities for teachers to share their knowledge with our community oflearners. While teachers will take this class to learn from the teacher, they will also share their

    own experiences and wealth of knowledge so they may strengthen what they already know, and

    also learn from each other. Each smaller presentation will receive a grade based on thefollowing rubric that same evening. The final project will be shared out on the last day so we

    may offer support and suggestions, and continue to gather ideas and learn from each other on the

    last day.

    0-4 points 5-9 points 10-14 points 15-20 points

    Presentations are noton time, and haveinadequate visuals, or

    do not connect to

    professional resources.

    Presentations are ontime but haveinadequate visuals and

    do not have a strong

    connection toprofessional resources.

    Presentations showthought and connectionto professional

    literature, but lack

    hands on materialsother teachers can use.

    Presentations showdeep reflection,connections to

    professional reading

    and are engaging. Alsoincluded are materials

    teachers can readily

    use in their ownclassroom.

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    8/22

    P a g e | 8

    Percentage Contribution of Each Assignment and Class Participation:

    Class Participation 10 % On-going, withself-reflection mi

    way through the

    semester and onthe last day.

    Readings and Journal Entries 30 % Due on the

    following week o

    the assigned entry

    Notebook Organized and Complete 10 % Due on last day

    Project in Clearly Marked Binder 30% Due on last day

    Presentations 20 % Due throughout th

    semester, and fina

    project presented

    on the last class

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    9/22

    P a g e | 9

    Class 1: Overview

    A.) Introductions: 1 question each person has

    B.) Rd. chpt. 1 Catching Readers (expand paradigm)a. Make a T chart (beliefs and looks in classroom) and share in small group

    C.) Break: During Break write how well you know Vygosky (VW-very well, NM-not much,

    N-nothing)D.) Rd. chpt. 2 Catching Readers (how reading works)

    a. Pick 1 point on pg. 22 to elaborate on and connect to your classroom. Do in small

    groupsSave the Last Word for MEE.) Rd. poem to feel your own strategy at work

    Home work:

    Chapter 3 Catching Readers (Vygosky) (Before read write 1 thing you know aboutZPD. Afterwards write 1 new thing. Observe 2 readers: 1 struggling, 1 not- use Fig. 2.1 on pg. 19-write a journal entry aboutyour observations and differences of the 2.

    Bring in 1 assessment you routinely use along with a 2 page handout to share/present. Read sheet Reading Instruction: Tips for Teachers by the LDA.

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    10/22

    P a g e | 10

    Class 2: Vygosky and Assessment

    A.) Share out homework: New learning about Vygosky

    B.) Use pg. 42 figure 3.3 along with handouts to write a lesson using Gradual Release ModelC.) Youtube video of Vygosky

    D.) Break

    E.) Share out homework-2 pp. on an assessment used-each person shares one question, onecomment

    a. On lg. chart paper write each assessment-list and discuss others

    b. Though each district different, main assessment is RRc. Video of child doing RRhave class do while watching video

    Homework:

    Read chapter 4 of Catching Readers (Beyond sounding it out). Use bulleted list on pg. 49 to see whether your classroom incorporates some of

    Vygotskys principles. Write a reflection on this list and your classroom. Implement a change in a classroom practice (writing workshop, spelling program,morning message, guided reading, etc.) to show that you added an idea to try to meet

    students ZPD. Bring the information to share.

    Project Work: Use Appendix 3 on pg. 233 with 1 student you are concerned with. Write a1 page narrative on how it went

    Bring in a favorite Big Book to use for the next class

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    11/22

    P a g e | 11

    Class 3: Target Areas: Vygosky and Assessment

    A.) Read chpt. 10 of Catching Readers

    B.) Share conference sheets. Look at appendices 13-15. Could you use any of these? Whatdo you use now? (Small group discussion). Share out with class.

    C.) Share out homework: 1 change in classroom: challenges and successes

    D.) Read chpt. 5 Observation Survey (miscue analysis)a. Discuss

    b. Rewatch RR video and do M, S, V

    c. Make a plan for instruction based on 1 of 3 subheadings-making sense, balance,confirming (pp. 63-67) with a small group using big book brought inShare

    Homework:

    Read Revisiting the Role Of Miscue Analysis in Effective Teaching RT 2006

    Read chpt. 7 Catching Readers (I thought I knew how to teach reading) Do a RRand miscue on 1 child, and design a lesson based on that information

    Project Work: Bring in at least 2 assessments on the child you have been looking at.Think about what you might want to focus on with this student (comprehension,

    decoding/phonics/word study, fluency,) based on what you know so far. Journal your

    thoughts, questions, concerns.

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    12/22

    P a g e | 12

    Class 4: Target Area: Decoding, Phonics, Phonemic Awareness, and Word Study

    A.) Share in small group lesson designed based on M, S, V

    a. Each person in group say:i. One thing they liked

    ii. One question they have about the lesson

    B.) Read chpt. 5 Growing Readers to page 133.(using strategies) a. Share out my resources for decoding strategies and prompts

    b. Share video of Tracy teaching decoding strategies

    c. Show video of gr. 1 checking off decoding strategiesC.) Read Strategies for Beginning Readers and Writers and Those Needing Additional

    Support and Intervention chp. 5 from Teaching Phonics Today from IRA

    a. Small group discussion: 2 questions at end of chapter

    Homework:

    Bring in a resource to share that you use for the teaching of phonics, phonemicawareness, or word work

    Rd. Explicit, Systematic Phonic Instruction RT: Review your phonic/spelling program.Do you consider it to be explicit and systematic: why or why not?

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    13/22

    P a g e | 13

    Class 5: Target Areas: Phonics, Word Work, Phonemic Awareness

    A.) Read Evaluating the Suitability of Phonological Awareness Programs for Children Who

    are at Risk by Jeanne Wanzek et al. Review your own phonological program with a partnerusing the checklist on page 33 of the article.

    B.) Share Resources and BER stuff for:

    a. Word Work: WTW sortsb. Phonics

    c. Phonemic Awareness (share binder)

    i. Read chpt. 3 of The Struggling Reader: Interventions that Work byCooper (phonemic awareness)

    ii. Do a group discussion using communicating, comprehending and consultingamong teachers

    Homework: Read pg. from LDA o Phonology Chapters 4 of Allington Rd. from Phonological Awareness to Fluency RT Bring in blank sentence strips

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    14/22

    P a g e | 14

    Class 6: Target Areas: Fluency Part A

    A.) Fluency

    a. Review 3-Minute Assessments by Rasinski,b. Poetry (FDL handout by Rasinski) and Fast Start

    i. Do Jabberwocky together to develop an FDL

    c. ORL (share pp.125, 127, 128 ofThe Fluent Reader)d. Read Naturally (share)

    e. FRY sight word phrases (handout)

    i. Make materials: Allow them to make sight word phrases on sentence stripsf. Readers Theater (share resources and websitetimrasinski.com and pg. 110,

    111 of The Fluent Reader)

    B.) Read Rhythm Walk RT and Two Essential Ingredients: Phonics and Fluency Getting

    to Know Each Other RTChoose a poem and do in a small group

    Homework:

    Rd. Reading Acceleration ProgramRT (RAP) Rd. Helping Students Become Accurate, Expressive Readers (FOOR)RT Project Work: Choose one program youve just learned or read aboutPhon. Awareness

    to fluency, FDL, Read Naturally, Readers Theater, Rhythm Walk, RAP, or FOOR andtry on one student. Was it successful? Did you find it was useable? What were the

    negatives?

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    15/22

    P a g e | 15

    Class 7: Fluency Part B

    A.) Read Punctuation Takes a Vacation

    a. Share fluency gamesB.) Go over RAP, FOOR.

    a. With a small group, use large chart paper and create a chart comparing the various

    fluency methods looked at. What are the commonalities? What do you notice about the benefitsof them? How would you determine which to use?

    C.) Break

    D.) Paired Reading (view powerpoint and video from Parent Workshop)

    Homework:

    Project Work: Do a fluency assessment on your student from 3 minute assessment.Design a lesson from last week or this week for that student. Be ready to share with yourgroup next week. Journal: How did it go? Did it work? What are your concerns? How

    could it have gone better?

    Read Chpt. 5 of Allington-(comprehension)

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    16/22

    P a g e | 16

    Class 8: Target Area: Comprehension Part A

    A.) Go over fluency assessment and lesson from homework.B.)

    Comprehension:a. Read chpt. 6 Growing Readers (Readers Think)

    b. Share handouts (list of books for each strategy)

    i. List Basic Comp. Strat. to Teach: video of Tracy H. mini-lessonsa.) Three-Two-One---Lets Chat paper

    ii. Prediction

    iii. Mental imagesiv. Clarify

    v. Question

    vi. Schema

    vii. Connections

    viii. Inferringix. Synthesizing (summarizing)

    c. Read chpt. 8, 9 of Catching Readers (comprehension and inferring)i. Journal: What are your feelings/understanding about the difference between

    spotlighting a strategy and heavy-handed teaching?

    C.) Work with a partner to use appendix 10 or 11 and plan a shared demonstration lesson onvisualizing.

    Homework:

    Read Hands On Reciprocal Teaching RT PLUS either Reciprocal Teaching for thePrimary Grades RT OR Rec. Teaching for Kindergarten RT

    Read Taffy Raphael article on QAR Project Work: Try a lesson on questioning, visualizing, inferring, or summarizing similar

    to the ones presented in chapters 8 and 9. How did it go? What were the downfalls? Thepluses?

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    17/22

    P a g e | 17

    Class 9: Comprehension Part B

    A.) Reciprocal Teaching

    a. show video here of someone doing Reciprocal TeachingB.) QAR

    a. Powerpoint from August in-service

    b. Do activity (1/2 hour) from Taffy RaphaelC.) Read START Comprehending

    a. Show video of me doing START

    i. Three-Two-One---Lets Chat! paper

    Homework:

    Read chpt. 6 Allington (Knowledgeable Teachers)-Look at the bulleted box on pg. 158Effective Classroom Programs for Struggling Readers Which of these characteristicsdoes your program possess? Which would you add? Which do you disagree with or

    have difficulty doing?

    Chapters 8, 9 of Teaching Struggling Readers by Lyons(characteristics and practices ofteachers)journal response, thoughts, ideas, questions, concerns.

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    18/22

    P a g e | 18

    Class 10: Characteristics of an Exemplary Literacy Program for Struggling Readers

    A.) Knowledgeable Teachers

    a. Read chpt. 12 Catching Readersb. Look at bulleted list on pp. 225-226. With a partner, discuss which suggestion

    you might consider trying out in the future. Talk about how you might go about it. Make a plan

    on implementing one thing.B.) Professional Development

    C.) Communications

    a. Colleague (share Rita Bean handout)i. Pg. 219 includes a generic list of things to think about when speaking with

    any parent. Discuss these with a small group, and brainstorm a few more to add to the list.

    ii. Share out

    b. Parents: Read Chpt. 11 of Catching Readers and Strategies for Engaging Parents in

    Home Support of Reading Acquisition-RTD.) Making a Plan:

    a. Think about these 4 thingscontinuing to be a knowledgeable teacher, engagingin professional development, communicating with colleagues, and communicating with parents:

    Use the divided paper to list things you are doing well, and something youd like to do

    differently. Circle one thing in each section you can change.

    Homework:

    Project Work: Gather what you have so far on your 1 student: You should have severalassessments, an initial focus idea, plus various trial instructional methods. Look over allof your assessments. What is one are your student is the weakest in? How do you know

    that? Do you need to do further assessments? Make a planchoose the one area you

    want to increase his/her competency. Within this one area, list at least 5 different things

    you can do. Use appendix 3, 7, or 16 to help you plan out the next few weeks. Do youuse guided reading or reading workshop? How will you incorporate the plan for your

    student into this?

    Read chapters 5, 6 in Teaching Struggling Readers by Lyon. Be ready to discuss nextclass.

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    19/22

    P a g e | 19

    Class 11: Working with the Difficult Students

    A.) Difficult students:

    a. Read chpt. 7 in Lyons.b. Review chpts. 5-7 in Lyons. Free write: what are you the most confused about?

    What are you the most comfortable with? What strategies do you think you can implement?

    Does your chose student fall into any of these categories? How do you think you can helphim/her while addressing their issue? If your chosen child does not fall into these categories,

    reflect on what you think the struggle is based on? How do these considerations change what

    you are going to do with this child instructionally?B.) Putting It All Together:

    a. Read chapter 5 in Catching Readers

    i. Discuss your project plan with a partner. What are you nervous about?

    What do you think will be the easiest? The most difficult? What materials will you

    need? How does your schedule currently look? Are you allowing more instructional timefor your struggling learner? What are the other students doing while you are meeting

    with your small groups or holding individual reading conferences during a readingworkshop? What do you need to change, if anything? What kind of support will you

    need? What support do you have for this one student you will be working with? How

    will you communicate with his/her other teacher (reading specialist, Title 1, or SPED?)What forms will you use?

    Homework:

    Project Work: Do one lesson with your student. Journal how it went. What are the nextsteps? Develop next lesson.

    Read chapter 2 in Lyons Teaching Struggling Readers (movement and learning). Bringone comment and one question to share.

    Read Roadblocks to Raising Achievement packet. Bring one comment and onequestion to share

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    20/22

    P a g e | 20

    Class 12: Attention, Movement and Learning

    A.) Small group work: List 2 comments and 2 questions from last weeks readings. For each

    question and comment, each person in group is allowed to say 1-2 sentences. Record.B.) Go over Jensens Brain Research

    a. Focus on short term memory and activities to increase it

    C.) Brain Gyma. Focus on activities

    i. List resources in binder together

    ii. Pp. 8-13 of Raising the Achievement of Title 1 Students from IED

    Homework:

    Check on binder and be sure that it is up to date, tabbed, and all papers are inserted and 3-holed punch.

    Project Work: Develop and implement one action based learning lesson. It may includethe whole class, but be sure to focus on your project student. Choose one area out of

    those we have learned about to focus on with your chosen student for the next few weeks.Develop at least 3 lessons in this focus area that you will do with your student.

    Read How Do Your Kids Do at Reading? by David Tucker.

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    21/22

    P a g e | 21

    Class 13: The LD Student and Dyslexia

    A.)30 minutes for questions/concerns about project.B.)Learning Disabilities

    a. Read Reading Methods and Learning Disabilities and Learning DisabilityChecklist by LDA. Work with a partner to use checklist with your chosenstudent.

    C.)Dyslexiaa. Read checklist (Shaywitz), Signs and Symptoms from LDA and Dyslexia and

    the Brain: What does Current Research Tell Us? by Hudson.

    b. Sally Shaywitz: share instructional methods.

    Homework:

    Work on Project, Binder, and Presentation. Be sure presentation includes idea sheet orother material to share with colleagues.

  • 8/2/2019 Enriching Instr for Strug Read - EDLT 200 CO1 - Course Syllabus

    22/22

    P a g e | 22

    Class 14: Make-up, begin project presentations

    Class 15: Project Presentations

    A.)Write critique, comments, and questions for each project presented.