eni s.p.a. upstream & technical services...eni s.p.a. upstream & technical services 8 the...
TRANSCRIPT
eni s.p.a.upstream & technical services
Upscaling of WFT data to estimate the reservoir flow capacity
San Donato Milanese, 15/10/2014
Andrea Adelmo Asci
Master in Petroleum Engineering and Operations 2013-2014
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services
Upscaling of WFT data to estimate the reservoir flow capacity
Author:
Andrea Adelmo Asci
Division: eni S.p.A.
Upstream & Technical Services
Dept.: RESM
San Donato Milanese, 15/10/2014
Company Tutors:
Enzo Beretta
Giuseppe Tripaldi
Eleonora Azzarone
University Tutor:
Prof. Francesca Verga
2013-2014Master in Petroleum Engineering and Operations
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services33
Agenda
Scope of Work & Background
Case Studies & Workflow
Conclusions & Future Works
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services4
Scope of Work
� To identify suitable methodologies for upscaling local well data,acquired by WFT (Wireline Formation Testing), to reservoir size(for major clastic scenarios) in order to avoid conventional testingoperations.
� To provide a preliminary workflow to point out the main selectioncriteria for the entire upscaling process.
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services
Cost Saving in deep-water and ultra-deep-waterscenarios, where daily rig cost exceeds 1 MMUSD.
Matching HSE constraints, particularly in geographicalareas where hydrocarbons flaring is not allowed/limited.
Data valorization for reservoir studies, i.e. well deliverability.
5
Motivations & Benefits
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services6
eni State of the Art
� Increasing number of miniDSTs (dual packer and Saturn tools)performed in recent years (11/2012–08/2014): about 15 fieldapplications.
� Some preliminary studies about WFT data exploitation.
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services
Oil Companies
Other Oil Companies are investigating on upscaling. All major oil companies involved in miniDSTs.
Universities & Research Centers
Imperial College, London.
Service Companies
Baker Atlas (Technical support).Schlumberger, Halliburton (miniDSTs).
7
Worldwide State of the Art
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services8
The Framework
� eni R&D Project: Increasing cost-saving in deep-water exploration/appraisal campaigns by reducing well testing operations.
� Objective: Development of a methodology and of interpretation tools to upscale WFT at reservoir scale.
� Duration: 3 years (Feb. 2014 – Jan. 2017).
� Involved Professional Areas: Petroleum Engineering (RESM), Petrophysics (GICA), Operational Geology (GEOP).
� On-Going Activity: Data Collection and Q/C. Pre-feasibility studies.
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services99
Agenda
Scope of Work & Background
Case Studies & Workflow
Conclusions & Future Works
Case 1: Upscaling of Single Probe data
Case 2: Upscaling of MiniDST data
Screening Matrix and Workflow
Case Studies & Workflow
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services
�
10
Single Probe Tool
Tool Features
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services11
Single Probe vs. Conventional Well Test
Regarding the upscaling:
� To be proposed if the reservoir is vertically homogeneous.
� No miniDST can be performed because of thick layers (> 15 m).
� “Indirect Upscaling” methodology, i.e. field-calibrated correlations.
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services12
Single Probe: “Indirect” Upscaling
Further work planned:
� To deeper Q/C the WFT derived permeabilities (and particularly to investigate uncertainty at low/high mobilities).
� To search correlations considering also petrophysical synthetic permeabilities (to be used as weight factor in averages).
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services1313
Agenda
Scope of Work & Background
Case Studies & Workflow
Conclusions & Future Works
Case 1: Upscaling of Single Probe data
Case 2: Upscaling of MiniDST data
Screening Matrix and Workflow
Case Studies & Workflow
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services14
MiniDST: Tools Comparison
Dual-Packer 3D Saturn Radial ProbeP
RO
S
� Larger flowing area.
� Adjustable height (1 - 3 m).
� Improved sealing.
� No storage volume.
� Faster fluid identification.� Reduced operations time.
CO
NS
� Longer cleanup time.
� Higher sticking risk.
� Set flowing interval.
� Higher partial penetration.
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services15
MiniDST: Tested layer vs. Upscaled Interval
Data
Tool 3D Saturn Probe
Tested layer 23 ft.
Net Pay 40 ft.
Average porosity 16 %
Fluid Type Oil
Oil Viscosity 0.35 cP
Oil FVF 1.3 RB/STB
Total Compressibility 10-5 psi-1
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services16
MiniDST: Data Interpretation
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services
Direct Upscaling
k-Φ correlation from cores
17
MiniDST: Direct Upscaling
SyntheticPermeabilityLog
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services18
MiniDST: Direct Upscaling Results
� From this pre-feasibility study, permeability data from the upscaled pay and thereference well are in agreement.
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services1919
Agenda
Scope of Work & Background
Case Studies & Workflow
Conclusions & Future Works
Case 1: Upscaling of Single Probe data
Case 2: Upscaling of MiniDST data
Screening Matrix and Workflow
Case Studies & Workflow
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services
Reservoir Scenario Operation Analysis
� Single layer� Homogeneous � Thickness < 15 m
Run miniDST No Upscaling Required
� Single layer / Multilayer� Homogeneous� Thickness >> 15 m
Exploit Single Probe Data
Field-CalibratedCorrelations (“Indirect” Upscaling)
� Single layer� Heterogeneous� Thickness >> 15 m
WT Required WT data interpretation
� Multilayer� Homogeneous� At least one layer < 15 m
Run miniDST Direct Upscaling
� Multilayer� Heterogeneous� All layers thickness >> 15 m
WT Required WT data interpretation
20
Preliminary Screening Matrix:Upscaling Methodology vs. Reservoir Scenario
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services21
Upscaling Feasibility Preliminary Workflow
More than one layer?
YES
WELL DELIVERABILITY
At least one layer < 15 m?
YES
Run MiniDST on “key” layer
RESERVOIR ISSUES(Late time models,
critical fluid sampling…)
Conventional Well testing
NO
Exploit Single Probe Data
NO
Run MiniDST
“Indirect” Upscaling
Direct Upscaling
MiniDST Data interpretation
Well Test Data Interpretation
Screen
ing
Crit
eria
Op
erati
on
sA
naly
sis
Start
WT Objective?
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services2222
Agenda
Scope of Work & Background
Case Studies & Workflow
Conclusions & Future Works
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services
� The pre-feasibility studies on the upscalability of permeabilitiesderived from both single probe and miniDST showed challengingresults.
� A preliminary screening matrix on suitable “upscalingmethodology vs. reservoir scenario” has been set.
� An effective preliminary workflow summarized the studied casesin order to identify the upscaling opportunities achieved so far.
23
Conclusions
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services24
Future Works
� Further insight in petrophysics will be accounted to make theresults more robust.
� The feasibility study will be extended to other case studies up to06/2015, when a prototype upscaling methodology is expected to bedelivered.
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services25
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Eni Upstream and Technical Services Division Management for permission to present this work and related results, and RESM colleagues for
the technical support and needed assistance.
Moreover, thank you all for your attention!
eni s.p.a. upstream & technical
services
Any questions?
Q&A