enhancing tdf model results using intersection control specific delays and turning movement level...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and
Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study
Presented to the 11th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications
May 9, 2007
By
Gregory Giaimo, Ohio Department of Transportation
![Page 2: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Motivation of Presentation
• Demonstrate Use of New Techniques to Improve TDF Model Results for Project Analysis
• Emphasis on a Careful and Methodical Implementation versus “Push Button”
![Page 3: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Two Key Tools
• Explicit Intersection Delay Modeling
• Turn Movement Level Matrix Estimation
![Page 4: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Background on the Mansfield Traffic and Parking Study
• Various one way street configurations downtown to be analyzed
• Need opening (2012) and design year volumes for the AM and PM peak hours
• Consultant has already set up and run a Synchro analysis using the base year counted volumes and the existing operational configuration
• Task: to create good forecast turn movement volumes on these alternatives for further Synchro operational analysis to produce a final alternative
![Page 5: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels
Check network & count coding
Turn counts and Synchro files from
MPO
Rerun base year model using
revised network
Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and
PM periods
Add detailed signal timing and
progression
Calculate Fratar targets at sub area
cordon
Run matrix estimation to create
final base year demand volumes
Forecast zonal variables from MPO
Check variables, reformat and fix as
necessary
Create scenarios in full model for forecast
years
Extract sub areas for each period for each
forecast year
Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future
Fratar base demand to future
Code alternative networks
Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening,
design) to all networks
Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV
format
Study Flow Chart
Reassign, correct obvious path
problems, reassign
![Page 6: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Network Lane Checking• Turn lane
configurations in the model were checked vs. Synchro. These were double checked vs. aerial photos and video log.
• Errors in network were corrected and full validation model rerun.
• Some errors in the Synchro data were found and were sent to the MPO
![Page 7: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Check Count Consistency• Turn counts were checked for
consistency in a spreadsheet
• They were also aggregated to link level and plotted on the network
• Overall, the turn counts from adjacent intersections were reasonably consistent
PM Peak Turn Volumes Aggregated to Links
![Page 8: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels
Check network & count coding
Turn counts and Synchro files from
MPO
Rerun base year model using
revised network
Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and
PM periods
Add detailed signal timing and
progression
Calculate Fratar targets at sub area
cordon
Run matrix estimation to create
final base year demand volumes
Forecast zonal variables from MPO
Check variables, reformat and fix as
necessary
Create scenarios in full model for forecast
years
Extract sub areas for each period for each
forecast year
Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future
Fratar base demand to future
Code alternative networks
Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening,
design) to all networks
Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV
format
Study Flow Chart
Reassign, correct obvious path
problems, reassign
![Page 9: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Updating Signal OperationsOver-ride signal locations
Signal phasing editor
• Updated signal timings and progression based on Synchro files
• Moral: assumed default signal operation parameters don’t work with operational level studies
![Page 10: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels
Check network & count coding
Turn counts and Synchro files from
MPO
Rerun base year model using
revised network
Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and
PM periods
Add detailed signal timing and
progression
Calculate Fratar targets at sub area
cordon
Run matrix estimation to create
final base year demand volumes
Forecast zonal variables from MPO
Check variables, reformat and fix as
necessary
Create scenarios in full model for forecast
years
Extract sub areas for each period for each
forecast year
Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future
Fratar base demand to future
Code alternative networks
Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening,
design) to all networks
Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV
format
Study Flow Chart
Reassign, correct obvious path
problems, reassign
![Page 11: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Rerun Base Year Model
Save Paths
![Page 12: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels
Check network & count coding
Turn counts and Synchro files from
MPO
Rerun base year model using
revised network
Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and
PM periods
Add detailed signal timing and
progression
Calculate Fratar targets at sub area
cordon
Run matrix estimation to create
final base year demand volumes
Forecast zonal variables from MPO
Check variables, reformat and fix as
necessary
Create scenarios in full model for forecast
years
Extract sub areas for each period for each
forecast year
Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future
Fratar base demand to future
Code alternative networks
Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening,
design) to all networks
Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV
format
Study Flow Chart
Reassign, correct obvious path
problems, reassign
![Page 13: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Extract Sub Area Net and Trip Table
• Not always necessary but helpful in this case
![Page 14: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels
Check network & count coding
Turn counts and Synchro files from
MPO
Rerun base year model using
revised network
Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and
PM periods
Add detailed signal timing and
progression
Calculate Fratar targets at sub area
cordon
Run matrix estimation to create
final base year demand volumes
Forecast zonal variables from MPO
Check variables, reformat and fix as
necessary
Create scenarios in full model for forecast
years
Extract sub areas for each period for each
forecast year
Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future
Fratar base demand to future
Code alternative networks
Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening,
design) to all networks
Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV
format
Study Flow Chart
Reassign, correct obvious path
problems, reassign
![Page 15: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Fratar Cordon Volumes• 24 Hour Link car/truck counts at cordon
converted to period level directional values using full model assignment
• Original sub area trip table Fratared
![Page 16: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels
Check network & count coding
Turn counts and Synchro files from
MPO
Rerun base year model using
revised network
Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and
PM periods
Add detailed signal timing and
progression
Calculate Fratar targets at sub area
cordon
Run matrix estimation to create
final base year demand volumes
Forecast zonal variables from MPO
Check variables, reformat and fix as
necessary
Create scenarios in full model for forecast
years
Extract sub areas for each period for each
forecast year
Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future
Fratar base demand to future
Code alternative networks
Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening,
design) to all networks
Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV
format
Study Flow Chart
Reassign, correct obvious path
problems, reassign
![Page 17: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Check for Routing Problems
• Fratared trip tables assigned and assignments checked for path problems
• Some small speed adjustments corrected most problems
• Due to odd routing of SR 13 through CBD, SR 13 through trips were placed in their own volume group to force them on the SR 13 signed route (because a much shorter path down Main Street exists but counts indicate the through traffic largely remains on the signed route)
![Page 18: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels
Check network & count coding
Turn counts and Synchro files from
MPO
Rerun base year model using
revised network
Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and
PM periods
Add detailed signal timing and
progression
Calculate Fratar targets at sub area
cordon
Run matrix estimation to create
final base year demand volumes
Forecast zonal variables from MPO
Check variables, reformat and fix as
necessary
Create scenarios in full model for forecast
years
Extract sub areas for each period for each
forecast year
Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future
Fratar base demand to future
Code alternative networks
Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening,
design) to all networks
Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV
format
Study Flow Chart
Reassign, correct obvious path
problems, reassign
![Page 19: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Prepare Inputs for Matrix Estimation
• Car/Truck are compressed, turning movement counts were by class but truck volume was too low to bother with independently
• Extract trip ends• Add confidence levels to data:
– Trip table cell 1– Internal trip end 10– External trip end 50– Older turn count 50– New turn count 75
![Page 20: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Run Matrix Estimation
• Can accept various data items such as:– Link or turn counts– Trip ends– Seed trip table– Etc.
• All inputs require confidence levels– Relative values– Order of magnitude difference needed to see much impact
• Adjusts the trip matrix to fit the various weighted (through confidence levels) observed data with minimum error
![Page 21: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Run Matrix Estimation (cont.)
2 Matrices required, trips and confidence level
ASCII, zone, origins, destinations, O confidence, D confidence
ASCII, screen number, from-through-to nodes, count, confidence level
The information contained in the print file is extremely important and should be well understood by anyone wishing to use matrix estimation properly
Need a path file from a previous assignment
![Page 22: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Run Matrix Estimation Print File
Here’s information on average confidence levels and amounts of data, very important for helping set confidence levels.
This shows input matrix characteristics, the warning messages show counts that had no trips assigned in the prior assignment. This is important, a link or turn with no assignment before won’t get any in matrix estimation either.
This shows that convergence occurred and the number of iterations.
This shows how good each zones trip ends match.
This shows how well each count was matched, notice that the counts match better than trip ends due to higher confidence.
![Page 23: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels
Check network & count coding
Turn counts and Synchro files from
MPO
Rerun base year model using
revised network
Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and
PM periods
Add detailed signal timing and
progression
Calculate Fratar targets at sub area
cordon
Run matrix estimation to create
final base year demand volumes
Forecast zonal variables from MPO
Check variables, reformat and fix as
necessary
Create scenarios in full model for forecast
years
Extract sub areas for each period for each
forecast year
Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future
Fratar base demand to future
Code alternative networks
Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening,
design) to all networks
Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV
format
Study Flow Chart
Reassign, correct obvious path
problems, reassign
![Page 24: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Check Forecast Variables• Variables
checked in spreadsheet and through plots
• Noticed large discrepancy between 2000 and 2005 due to changes in assumptions
![Page 25: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Check Forecast Variables (cont.)• In contrast the
2005 and 2030 variables are consistent and show growth in reasonable areas
• Since the forecast variables aren’t “official” it was decided to use these to derive growth factors for the base year
![Page 26: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels
Check network & count coding
Turn counts and Synchro files from
MPO
Rerun base year model using
revised network
Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and
PM periods
Add detailed signal timing and
progression
Calculate Fratar targets at sub area
cordon
Run matrix estimation to create
final base year demand volumes
Forecast zonal variables from MPO
Check variables, reformat and fix as
necessary
Create scenarios in full model for forecast
years
Extract sub areas for each period for each
forecast year
Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future
Fratar base demand to future
Code alternative networks
Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening,
design) to all networks
Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV
format
Study Flow Chart
Reassign, correct obvious path
problems, reassign
![Page 27: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Run Forecast Year Model
Base Year Model with Forecast Variables
New Scenarios added for forecast land use
![Page 28: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels
Check network & count coding
Turn counts and Synchro files from
MPO
Rerun base year model using
revised network
Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and
PM periods
Add detailed signal timing and
progression
Calculate Fratar targets at sub area
cordon
Run matrix estimation to create
final base year demand volumes
Forecast zonal variables from MPO
Check variables, reformat and fix as
necessary
Create scenarios in full model for forecast
years
Extract sub areas for each period for each
forecast year
Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future
Fratar base demand to future
Code alternative networks
Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening,
design) to all networks
Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV
format
Study Flow Chart
Reassign, correct obvious path
problems, reassign
![Page 29: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Fratar to Forecast Year
• Trip ends extracted from forecast year trip tables• Fratar factors (not targets) calculated in spreadsheet• Separate Origin and Destination factors (excerpt below is
from the Origin factor computation)
![Page 30: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels
Check network & count coding
Turn counts and Synchro files from
MPO
Rerun base year model using
revised network
Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and
PM periods
Add detailed signal timing and
progression
Calculate Fratar targets at sub area
cordon
Run matrix estimation to create
final base year demand volumes
Forecast zonal variables from MPO
Check variables, reformat and fix as
necessary
Create scenarios in full model for forecast
years
Extract sub areas for each period for each
forecast year
Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future
Fratar base demand to future
Code alternative networks
Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening,
design) to all networks
Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV
format
Study Flow Chart
Reassign, correct obvious path
problems, reassign
![Page 31: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Code Alternative Networks
• Four alternatives– Alt. 1: Two way operation on Main and Diamond– Alt. 2: Two way operation on Main and Walnut– Alt. 3: Two way operation on Diamond, Main,
Mulberry and Walnut– Alt. 4: As Alt. 3 plus two way operation on First and
Second
• In addition to adding two way operation, lane configurations and signal operations updated appropriately
![Page 32: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Code Alternative Networks (cont.)Nobuild (Existing) Alternative 1
TURNLANE annotated, LANES colored
![Page 33: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Code Alternative Networks (cont.)Alternative 2 Alternative 3
TURNLANE annotated, LANES colored
![Page 34: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Code Alternative Networks (cont.)Alternative 4
TURNLANE annotated, LANES colored
![Page 35: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Compress car/truck, get trip end file and confidence levels
Check network & count coding
Turn counts and Synchro files from
MPO
Rerun base year model using
revised network
Extract sub area network and trip table for AM and
PM periods
Add detailed signal timing and
progression
Calculate Fratar targets at sub area
cordon
Run matrix estimation to create
final base year demand volumes
Forecast zonal variables from MPO
Check variables, reformat and fix as
necessary
Create scenarios in full model for forecast
years
Extract sub areas for each period for each
forecast year
Calculate Fratar factors by zone to adjust base year demand to future
Fratar base demand to future
Code alternative networks
Assign both periods for all three years (base, opening,
design) to all networks
Take DBF turn volumes to XLS and convert to Synchro CSV
format
Study Flow Chart
Reassign, correct obvious path
problems, reassign
![Page 36: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Assign & Export to Synchro•Save Turn Volumes to DBF
•Lookup tables of Synchro direction codes and intersection ID’s required in spreadsheet to convert Cube From-Thru-To node
•A pivot table in spreadsheet then easily converts turn movements to the tabular format required by Synchro
![Page 37: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Impact of Adjustments on VolumeOriginal Travel Demand Model Fratared Subarea Model
![Page 38: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Impact of Adjustments on Volume (cont.)Final Model After ME Turning Movement Counts
![Page 39: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Turn Volumes From Several Methods• The obvious question: After all this effort what is the impact on the final results?
• Different turning movement volumes are obtained using the adjusted sub-area model vs. simply coding the network changes/variables into the original model as shown below
• What impact do these differences have?
![Page 40: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Validated Regional Model Adjusted Sub-area Model
2000 Alternative 1, PM Peak Assignment, Intersection of Diamond & Park Ave West
263 Left
389 Through
378 Right
236 Left
859 Through
353 Right
![Page 41: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Turn Volumes From Several Methods (cont.)
• As expected the adjusted model matches counts better
• While the standard link based %RMSE of this model is 33%, the CBD turning movements have a substantially higher value of 73% for the validation year model
![Page 42: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Turn Volumes From Several Methods (cont.)
• The regional model using junction based assignment performs marginally better than the regional model using equilibrium when compared to counts
![Page 43: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Turn Volumes From Several Methods (cont.)
• However, more importantly, the sensitivity of traffic to the coded alternative is much closer to that obtained with the adjusted model
![Page 44: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Turn Volumes From Several Methods (cont.)
• Changes resulting from the forecast year are much smaller than the model error (without adjustments) due to the low growth in the area
![Page 45: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Turn Volumes From Several Methods (cont.)
• Changes resulting from the alternative are similar magnitude to the model error without adjustment
• Thus, the adjustment process and junction modeling is most likely needed to reasonably predict turning movement level outputs in an area highly regulated by traffic control devices such as the CBD
![Page 46: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Comparison of Model LOS
Original Model Final Sub Area Model
How do these volume differences impact the decision making process?
Different Volumes, Same Methods (Year 2000 No Build Shown)
![Page 47: Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032604/56649e5e5503460f94b582a4/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Questions
Please Use Microphone