enhance ment of efficiency of ethanol production from jerusalem artichoke
DESCRIPTION
ENHANCE MENT OF EFFICIENCY OF ETHANOL PRODUCTION FROM JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE. Quang D. Nguyen, Kálmán Dénes , Csilla Farkas , Ágoston Hoschke , Judit M. Rezessy-Szabó. T he 2 n d International Symposium „Vera Johanides “ 2013 . - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ENHANCEMENT OF EFFICIENCY OF ETHANOL PRODUCTION FROM JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE
Quang D. Nguyen, Kálmán Dénes, Csilla Farkas, Ágoston Hoschke, Judit M. Rezessy-SzabóThe 2nd International Symposium „Vera Johanides“ 2013
Production of bioethanol in EU-27 - 2009(million liters)
Source: www.biofuels-platform.ch
Welcome Croatia to be in this map (EU-28)! On the 3rd International Symposium „Vera Johanides“ in 2015 – Biotechnology and Forestry Complex in Croatia?
Total: 3703
Productivity of ethanol using different raw materials
Plant Main carbohydrate Productivity (l/ha)
Sugarcane saccharose 8000
Sugar beet saccharose 3300Jerusalem artichoke
inulin 4200
corn starch 2100potato starch 1900wheat starch 1800
wood cellulose/lignocellulose ?????
Potential of JA-based bioethanol production
Jerusalem artichoke is easy to cultivate Relatively high production yields: 16–20
t/ha (even 20-80 t/ha) for tubers, and 18–28 t/ha green weight for foliage
High carbohydrate content: 15-20 % mainly inulin and fructo-oligosaccharides
Cultivate yearly Can be harvested like potato
Problems addressedSaccharomyces cerevisiae strain
does not exhibit so high inulinase activity
Treatment: acidic or enzymaticExogenous enzyme preparationLow efficiency of bioconversion (60-
70 %)
ObjectivesTechnological development for
enhancement of efficiency of ethanol production using
Jerusalem artichoke as raw material
Inoculation techniqueSimultan saccharification and fermentationSemi-continuous fermentation technology
Development of inoculation techniqueEffects of various inoculation
techniques were investigated
Best oneon initial day 2/3 amount of inoculum (cell number) and on second day: 1/3 amount
Efficiency of bioconversion: 90 %
SSF vs. Mixed Culture Fermentation
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
Saccharomyces cerevisiae+ inulinase
Total carbohydrates Sugars with higher DPSaccharose Fermentable sugarsEthanol
Fermentation time (day)
Car
bohy
drat
es (
w/v
%)
Etha
nol c
once
ntra
tion
v/v%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
Mixed cultures (S. cerevisiae + Kl. marxianus)
Total carbohydrates Sugars with higher DPSaccharose Fermentable sugarsEthanol
Fermentation times (day)
Car
bohy
drat
es (
w/v
%)
Etha
nol c
once
ntra
tion
(v/v
%)
Efficiency of bioconverion: 85-88 %
Semi-continuous technology
0.00 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00 28.00 32.00 36.00 40.00 44.000
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Carbohydrates Ethanol
Fermentation time(days)
Etha
nol c
once
ntra
tion
(v/
v%)
Carb
ohyd
rate
s (w
/v%
)
Fresh mash
Harvested
Fresh mixed culture
ConclusionThe use of mixed culture in combination with semi-continuous fermentation technology definetely increases in the productivity, thus it is very promising for development of technology for production of bioethanol based on Jerusalem artichoke as raw material
AcknowledgementThis work was supported by
Hungarian Development Agency through Project number TÁMOP-4.2.1./B-09/1-KMR-2010-0005 and TECH_09-A3-2009-0194, as well as Hungarian Academy of Science through Bolyai János Research Grant
Thank you for your kind attention!