engr. m. fahad khan lecturer software engineering department university of engineering &...

63
Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Upload: hannah-allen

Post on 27-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Engr. M. Fahad KhanLecturer Software Engineering DepartmentUniversity Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Page 2: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Software Reuse

Ref: Chapter 18 Software Engineering By Ian Sommerville , 7th Edition

Page 3: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Objectives• Over the past few years software reuse has become more and

more common and reuse based development is now a mainstream approach to software engineering.

• This lecture presents an overview of software reuse and development with reuse.– Explain the benefits of software reuse and some reuse

problems– Discuss several different ways to implement software reuse– Explain how reusable concepts can be represented as

patterns or embedded in program generators– Discuss COTS reuse– Describe the development of software product lines

Page 4: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Topics Covered

• The reuse landscape• Design patterns• Generator based reuse• Application frameworks• Application system reuse

Page 5: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Software Reuse• In most engineering disciplines, systems are designed by

composing existing components that have been used in other systems.

• Software engineering has been more focused on original development but it is now recognised that to achieve better software, more quickly and at lower cost, we need to adopt a design process that is based on systematic software reuse.

Page 6: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila
Page 7: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Reuse-Based Software Engineering• Application system reuse

– The whole of an application system may be reused either by incorporating it without change into other systems (COTS reuse) or by developing application families.

• Component reuse– Components of an application from sub-systems to single objects

may be reused.

• Object and function reuse– Software components that implement a single well-defined object

or function may be reused.

Page 8: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila
Page 9: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Reuse benefits 1Increased dependability Reused software, that has been tried and tested in working systems,should be m ore dependable than new software. The initial use of thesoftware reveals any design and implementation faults. These are thenfixed, thus reducing the number of failures when the software is reused.

Reduced process risk If software exists, there is less uncertainty in the costs of reusing thatsoftware than in the costs of development. This is an important factorfor project management as it reduces the margin of error in project costestimation. This is particularly true when relatively large softwarecomponents such as sub-systems are reused.

Effective use of specialists Instead of application specialists doing the same work on differentprojects, these specialists can develop reusable software thatencapsulate their knowledge.

Reuse Benefits 1

Page 10: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Reuse benefits 2Standards compliance Some standards, such as user interface standards, can be

implemented as a set of standard reusable components. Forexample, if menus in a user interfaces are implemented usingreusable components, all applications present the same menuformats to users. The use of standard user interfaces improvesdependability as users are less likely to make mistakes whenpresented with a familiar interface.

Accelerated development Bringing a system to market as early as possible is o ften moreimportant than overall development costs. Reusing software canspeed up system production because both development andvalidation time should be reduced.

Reuse Benefits 2

Page 11: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Reuse problems 1Increased maintenancecosts

If the source code of a reused software system or component is notavailable then maintenance costs may be increased as the reusedelements of the system may become increasingly incompatible withsystem changes.

Lack of tool support CASE toolsets may not support development with reuse. It may bedifficult or impossible to integrate these tools with a componentlibrary system. The software process assumed by these tools may nottake reuse into account.

Not-invented-heresyndrome

Some software engineers sometimes prefer to re-write components asthey believe that they can improve on the reusable component. This ispartly to do with trust and partly to do with the fact that writingoriginal software is s een as more challenging than reusing otherpeopleÕs software.

Reuse Problems 1

Page 12: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Reuse problems 2Creating and maintaining acomponent library

Populating a reusable component library and ensuring the softwaredevelopers can use this library can be expensive. Our current techniquesfor classifying, cataloguing and retrieving software components areimmature.

Finding, understanding andadapting reusable components

Software components have to be discovered in a library, understood and,sometimes, adapted to work in a n ew environment. Engineers must bereasonably confident of finding a component in the library before they willmake routinely include a component search as part of their normaldevelopment process.

Reuse problems 2

Page 13: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

• Although reuse is often simply thought of as the reuse of system components, there are many different approaches to reuse that may be used.

• Reuse is possible at a range of levels from simple functions to complete application systems.

• The reuse landscape covers the range of possible reuse techniques.

The Reuse Landscape

Page 14: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

The Reuse Landscape

Designpatterns

Component-baseddevelopment

Componentframeworks

Service-orientedsystems

COTSintegration

Applicationproduct lines

Legacy systemwrapping

Programlibraries

Programgenerators

Aspect-orientedsoftware development

Configurable verticalapplications

Designpatterns

Component-baseddevelopment

Componentframeworks

Service-orientedsystems

COTSintegration

Applicationproduct lines

Legacy systemwrapping

Programlibraries

Programgenerators

Aspect-orientedsoftware development

Configurable verticalapplications

Page 15: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Reuse approaches 1

Design patterns Generic abstractions that occur across applications arerepresented as design patterns that show abstract and concreteobjects and interactions.

Component-baseddevelopment

Systems are developed by integrating components(collections of objects) that conform to component-modelstandards. This is covered in Chapter 19.

Applicationframeworks

Collections of abstract and concrete classes that can beadapted and extended to create application systems.

Legacy systemwrapping

Legacy systems (see Chapter 2) that can be ÔwrappedÕ bydefining a set of interfaces and providing access to theselegacy systems through these interfaces.

Service-orientedsystems

Systems are developed by linking shared services that may beexternally provided.

Reuse Approaches 1

Page 16: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Reuse approaches 2

Application productlines

An application type is generalised around a commonarchitecture so that it can be adapted in different ways fordifferent customers.

COTS integration Systems are developed by integrating existing applicationsystems.

Configurable verticalapplications

A generic system is designed so that it can be configured tothe needs of specific system customers.

Program libraries Class and function libraries implementing commonly-usedabstractions are available for reuse.

Program generators A generator system embeds knowledge of a particular typesof application and can generate systems or system fragmentsin that domain.

Aspect-orientedsoftware development

Shared components are woven into an application at differentplaces when the program is compiled.

Reuse Approaches 2

Page 17: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Reuse Planning Factors • The development schedule for the software.

• The expected software lifetime.

• The background, skills and experience of the development team.

• The criticality of the software and its non-functional requirements.

• The application domain.

• The execution platform for the software.

Page 18: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Concept Reuse

When you reuse program or design components, you have to follow the design decisions made by the original developer of the component.

Page 19: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Concept Reuse• This may limit the opportunities for reuse.

• However, a more abstract form of reuse is concept reuse when a particular approach is described in an implementation independent way and an implementation is then developed.

• The two main approaches to concept reuse are:– Design patterns

– Generative programming.

Page 20: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Design Patterns• A design pattern is a way of reusing abstract knowledge

about a problem and its solution.• A pattern is a description of the problem and the

essence of its solution.• It should be sufficiently abstract to be reused in

different settings.• Patterns often rely on object characteristics such as

inheritance and polymorphism.

Page 21: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Design PatternsIn software engineering, a design pattern is a general reusable

solution to a commonly occurring problem in software design. A design pattern is not a finished design that can be transformed directly into code. It is a description or template for how to solve a problem that can be used in many different situations. Object-oriented design patterns typically show relationships and interactions between classes or objects, without specifying the final application classes or objects that are involved.

Page 22: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila
Page 23: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Pattern Elements

• Name

– A meaningful pattern identifier.

• Problem description.

• Solution description.

– Not a concrete design but a template for a design solution

that can be instantiated in different ways.

• Consequences

– The results and trade-offs of applying the pattern.

Page 24: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

The Observer Pattern• Name

– Observer.

• Description– Separates the display of object state from the object itself.

• Problem description– Used when multiple displays of state are needed.

• Solution description– See slide with UML description.

• Consequences– Optimisations to enhance display performance are impractical.

Page 25: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Multiple displays

Multiple Displays

Page 26: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

The Observer pattern

The Observer Pattern

Page 27: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

The Observer pattern

The Observer Pattern

Page 28: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Generator-Based Reuse• Program generators involve the reuse of

standard patterns and algorithms.

• These are embedded in the generator and parameterised by user commands. A program is then automatically generated.

• Generator-based reuse is possible when domain abstractions and their mapping to executable code can be identified.

• A domain specific language is used to compose and control these abstractions.

Page 29: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Generator-Based ReuseTwo important phases in the software development process of large systems are

modeling and coding of the system components and their interrelations. While the modeling phase is the creative part and must be done manually, the coding phase should be automated.We describe a generator-based software development method for large systems and an experimental implementation of this method. Domain-specific base models are reused and customized to application models for many projects within the domain. The application models are then input to specialized, powerful code generators which produce most of the application's source code automatically. Furthermore, we discuss the reuse potential of using and customizing common base models and using domain- and component-specific code generators.

Page 30: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Types Of Program Generator• Types of program generator

– Application generators for business data processing;

– Parser and lexical analyser generators for language processing;

– Code generators in CASE tools.

• Generator-based reuse is very cost-effective but its applicability is limited to a relatively small number of application domains.

• It is easier for end-users to develop programs using generators compared to other component-based approaches to reuse.

Page 31: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Reuse Through Program Generation

Program generator Generated programApplicationdescription

Application domainknowledge

Database

Page 32: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Aspect-Oriented Development• Aspect-oriented development addresses a major software

engineering problem - the separation of concerns.

• Concerns are often not simply associated with application functionality but are cross-cutting - e.g. all components may monitor their own operation, all components may have to maintain security, etc.

• Cross-cutting concerns are implemented as aspects and are dynamically woven into a program. The concern code is reuse and the new system is generated by the aspect weaver.

Page 33: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Aspect-oriented developmentGenerated code

Aspect 1 Aspect 2

AspectWeaver

<statements 1>Aspect 1

<statements 2>Aspect 2

<statements 3>

Input source code

<statements 1>join point 1

<statements 2>join point 2

<statements 3>

Aspect-Oriented Development

Page 34: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Application Frameworks

• Frameworks are a sub-system design made up of a collection of abstract and concrete classes and the interfaces between them.

• The sub-system is implemented by adding components to fill in parts of the design and by instantiating the abstract classes in the framework.

• Frameworks are moderately large entities that can be reused.

Page 35: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Framework Types• System infrastructure frameworks

– Support the development of system infrastructures such as communications, user interfaces and compilers. JDRAW, ECLPISE, .NET

• Middleware integration frameworks– Standards and classes that support component communication

and information exchange. CORBA, COM+, EJBs.

• Enterprise application frameworks– Support the development of specific types of application such

as telecommunications or financial systems.

Page 36: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Extending Frameworks• Frameworks are generic and are extended to create a more

specific application or sub-system.

• Extending the framework involves

– Adding concrete classes that inherit operations from abstract

classes in the framework;

– Adding methods that are called in response to events that are

recognised by the framework.

• Problem with frameworks is their complexity which means

that it takes a long time to use them effectively.

Page 37: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Model-view Controller (MVC)• System infrastructure framework for GUI design.

• Allows for multiple presentations of an object and separate

interactions with these presentations.

• MVC framework involves the instantiation of a number of

patterns

• Includes Observer, Strategy, Composite and number of others

Page 38: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Model-view-controller

Model methods

Controller methods View methods

Userinputs

view modificationmessages

Model edits

Model queriesand updates

Controller state View state

Model state

Model-view-controller

Page 39: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Application System Reuse

• Involves the reuse of entire application systems either by configuring a system for an environment or by integrating two or more systems to create a new application.

• Two approaches covered here:– COTS product integration;– Product line development.

Page 40: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

COTS Product Reuse• COTS - Commercial Off-The-Shelf systems.

• COTS systems are usually complete application systems that offer

an API (Application Programming Interface). Modern Desktop, and

Database appl…

• Building large systems by integrating COTS systems is now a

viable development strategy for some types of system such as E-

commerce systems.

• The key benefit is faster application development and, usually,

lower development costs.

Page 41: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Commercial, off-the-shelf (COTS)

Commercial, off-the-shelf (COTS) or simply off the shelf (OTS) is a term for software or hardware, generally technology or computer products, that are ready-made and available for sale, lease, or license to the general public. They are often used as alternatives to in-house developments or one-off government-funded developments. The use of COTS is being mandated across many government and business programs, as they may offer significant savings in procurement and maintenance. However, since COTS software specifications are written by external sources, government agencies are sometimes wary of these products because they fear that future changes to the product will not be under their control.

Motivations for using COTS components include reduction of overall system development and costs (as components can be bought or licensed instead of being developed from scratch) and reduced maintenance costs. In software development, many considered COTS to be the silver bullet during the 1990s, but COTS development came with many not-so-obvious tradeoffs—overall cost and development time can definitely be reduced, but often at the expense of an increase in software component integration work and a dependency on a third-party component vendor.

Page 42: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

COTS Design Choices• Which COTS products offer the most appropriate functionality?

– There may be several similar products that may be used. You prior experience…

• How will data be exchanged?

– Individual products use their own data structures and formats. May need to write adaptors…

• What features of the product will actually be used?

– Most products have more functionality than is needed. You should try to deny access to unused functionality. May interfere with normal functionality

Page 43: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

E-procurement system

Client

Web browser E-mail system

Server

E-commercesystem

Ordering andinvoicing system

E-mail system

Adaptor

Adaptor

E-Procurement System

Page 44: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

COTS Products Reused• On the client, standard e-mail and web browsing

programs are used.• On the server, an e-commerce platform has to be

integrated with an existing ordering system.– This involves writing an adaptor so that they can

exchange data.

– An e-mail system is also integrated to generate e-mail for clients. This also requires an adaptor to receive data from the ordering and invoicing system.

Page 45: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

COTS System Integration Problems• Lack of control over functionality and performance

– COTS systems may be less effective than they appear

• Problems with COTS system inter-operability

– Different COTS systems may make different assumptions that means integration is difficult

• No control over system evolution

– COTS vendors not system users control evolution

• Support from COTS vendors

– COTS vendors may not offer support over the lifetime of the product

Page 46: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Software Product Lines

• Software product lines or application families are

applications with generic functionality that can be adapted

and configured for use in a specific context.

• Adaptation may involve:

– Component and system configuration;

– Adding new components to the system;

– Selecting from a library of existing components;

– Modifying components to meet new requirements.

Page 47: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

COTS Product Specialisation• Platform specialisation

– Different versions of the application are developed for different platforms.

• Environment specialisation– Different versions of the application are created to handle different

operating environments e.g. different types of communication equipment.

• Functional specialisation– Different versions of the application are created for customers with

different requirements.• Process specialisation

– Different versions of the application are created to support different business processes.

Page 48: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

COTS Configuration• Deployment time configuration

– A generic system is configured by embedding knowledge

of the customer’s requirements and business processes.

The software itself is not changed.

• Design time configuration

– A common generic code is adapted and changed

according to the requirements of particular customers.

Page 49: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

ERP System Organization (Deployment)

Configurationdatabase

System database

Generic ERP system

Configurationplanning tool

Page 50: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

ERP Systems• An Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system is a

generic system that supports common business processes such as ordering and invoicing, manufacturing, etc.

• These are very widely used in large companies - they represent probably the most common form of software reuse.

• The generic core is adapted by including modules and by incorporating knowledge of business processes and rules.

Page 51: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila
Page 52: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

ERP SystemsEnterprise Resource Planning (ERP) is a term usually used in

conjunction with ERP software or an ERP system which is intended to manage all the information and functions of a business or company from shared data stores.

An ERP system typically has modular hardware and software units and "services" that communicate on a local area network. The modular design allows a business to add or reconfigure modules (perhaps from different vendors) while preserving data integrity in one shared database that may be centralized or distributed.

Page 53: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Design Time Configuration

• Software product lines that are configured at

design time are instantiations of generic

application architectures

• Generic products usually emerge after

experience with specific products.

Page 54: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Product Line Architectures

• Architectures must be structured in such a way to

separate different sub-systems and to allow them to

be modified.

• The architecture should also separate entities and

their descriptions and the higher levels in the system

access entities through descriptions rather than

directly.

Page 55: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

A resource management system

User interface

Resourcemanagement

Resource policycontrol

Resourceallocation

Userauthentication

Querymanagement

Resource database

Resourcedelivery

Transaction management

A Resource Management System

Page 56: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Vehicle Despatching System• A specialised resource management system where the

aim is to allocate resources (vehicles) to handle incidents.• Adaptations include:

– At the UI level, there are components for operator display and communications;

– At the I/O management level, there are components that handle authentication, reporting and route planning;

– At the resource management level, there are components for vehicle location and despatch, managing vehicle status and incident logging;

– The database includes equipment, vehicle and map databases.

Page 57: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

A despatching system

User interface

Vehicle statusmanager

Incidentlogger

Operatorauthentication

Querymanager

Equipmentdatabase

Map and routeplanner

Transaction management

Vehicle database

Incident log

Map database

Vehicledespatcher

Equipmentmanager

Vehiclelocator

Reportgenerator

Comms systeminterface

A Despatching System

Page 58: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Product instance developmentElicit

stakeholderrequirements

Chooseclosest-fit

family memberDeliver new

family member

Renegotiaterequirements

Adapt existingsystem

Product Instance Development

Page 59: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Product Instance Development• Elicit stakeholder requirements

– Use existing family member as a prototype

• Choose closest-fit family member– Find the family member that best meets the requirements

• Re-negotiate requirements– Adapt requirements as necessary to capabilities of the software.

Negotiate to minimize changes

• Adapt existing system– Develop new modules and make changes for family member

• Deliver new family member– Document key features for further member development

Page 60: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

• Advantages of reuse are lower costs, faster software development and lower risks.

• Design patterns are high-level abstractions that document successful design solutions.

• Program generators are also concerned with software reuse - the reusable concepts are embedded in a generator system.

• Application frameworks are collections of concrete and abstract objects that are designed for reuse through specialisation.

Key Points

Page 61: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

Key Points• COTS product reuse is concerned with the reuse of large,

off-the-shelf systems.

• Problems with COTS reuse include lack of control over functionality, performance, and evolution and problems with inter-operation.

• ERP systems are created by configuring a generic system with information about a customer’s business.

• Software product lines are related applications developed around a common core of shared functionality.

Page 62: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila
Page 63: Engr. M. Fahad Khan Lecturer Software Engineering Department University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila

If you have any query please feel free to ask

Phone: +92-51-9047-574

Fax: +92-51-9047-420

Email: [email protected]

University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila Pakistan