engaging the patient in rehab adherence · 2020-07-07 · suffering chronic low back pain. •those...
TRANSCRIPT
ENGAGING THE PATIENT IN REHAB ADHERENCEWHAT MAKES YOUR PATIENT STICK WITH IT?
BY: ERNEST ROY PT, DPT
OUR OBJECTIVES TODAY
• Operationally define Adherence for purposes of clinician-patient
interactions.
• Describe what is known about rates of adherence among 4 different
patient problems seen in home care.
• Review concepts of Patient Activation.
• Learn at least 3 ways to use Motivational Interviewing with patients
to aid adherence.
• Explore Shared Decision Making to help patients stick with your care.
1
2
WHAT IS ADHERENCE?
According to Webster’s, adherence can thought of as:
• “Steady, of faithful attachment”
The WHO defines adherence as:
• "the extent to which a person's behavior… corresponds
with agreed recommendations from a healthcare
provider”
QUOTABLE QUOTES
“Drugs don't work in patients who don't take them”
C. Everett Koop – Former United States Surgeon
General
3
4
RATES OF ADHERENCE TO TREATMENT
• For pharmaceutical therapies,
research finds adherence rates for
chronic medications to average
around 50%.
• Adherence rates for medical advice
range from 20-80% rates depending
on the selected intervention.
Ref: Kim J, Combs K, Downs J, Tillman F. Medication adherence: The
elephant in the room. Medication Management. Published online Jan 19,
2018
Sharma B, Agrawal M. Factors affecting adherence to healthy lifestyle.
Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 5 (4): 105-116 (2017)
WHAT ABOUT ADHERENCE TO HOME EXERCISE REGIMENS?
• Research by Morad and
colleagues reported on surveys
of 44 PT’s. They found reasons
for low patient adherence to HEP
included:
• Fatigue (65%)
• Forgot to do the HEP (81%)
• Lack of sufficient time (75%)
Ref: Mourad S et al. Patient’s adherence to prescribed home
exercises: Barriers and interventions. Genetics and Molecular
Research 17 2018 (1): gmr16039898
5
6
FACTORS INFLUENCING ADHERENCE FOR SPECIFIC PATIENT POPULATIONS
• Dementia
• Total joint arthroplasty
• Cancer
• Low back pain
DEMENTIA PATIENTS AND ADHERENCE TO HOME EXERCISE REGIMENS
Findings based on the PrAISED study (Promoting Activity, Independence and
Stability in Early Dementia). Findings of the study revealed:
• 5 subjects exceeded adherence expectations, 7 met expectations, 8 did not
meet expected adherence levels.
• There were 6 overall factors identified as being related to patient
adherence.
Ref: Jennie E. HancoxID, Veronika van der Wardt, Kristian Pollock3, Vicky Booth, Kavita Vedhara, Rowan H. Harwood. Factors influencing adherence to home-based strength and
balance exercises among older adults with mild cognitive impairment and early dementia: Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED). PLOS ONE
| https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217387 May 23, 2019
7
8
FACTORS THAT IMPROVED ADHERENCE
• Routine, but with flexibility built in.
• Practical and emotional support-from both care givers AND
clinicians.
• Memory supports, including pictures and simplified progression
strategies.
• Prior history on sport/exercise participation.
• Having a sense of purpose for the exercises.
• Belief in the program and experience of benefiting.
TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY PATIENTS
Results based on a 2016 study of 8 TJA patients and 5 PT’s. Central
themes included:
1. Consistency or lack in health care delivery
2. Ability of PT’s to tailor exercise to fit patient needs and abilities
3. Expectations
4. Barriers to rehab
5. Incongruence of definition of successful outcome
Ref: Magklara E, Burton cC, Morrison V. Adherence to exercise after joint replacement surgery: patients’ and health professionals’ perceptions. The European Health Psychologist
2016. Vol 18 (Supp) 1070.
9
10
THE USE OF TELEPHONE FOLLOW UP FOR ADHERENCE S/P TKA
A study of 202 TKA patients post op from the People’s
Republic of China with 1 year follow up found significant
differences in favor of the intervention group for:
• Mean # of days and total time spent doing the HEP
• AROM @ 6 and 12 months post op
• Functional ability in everyday activities.
Ref: Mochuan Chen, Pihong Li, Feiou Lin. Influence of structured telephone follow-up on patient compliance with rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016; 10: 257–264.Published online 2016 Mar 3. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S102156
ADHERENCE TO EXERCISE REGIMENS IN BREAST CANCER
A Dutch trial of combined supervised and home based exercise
aimed at preventing lymphedema found:
• Lowest adherence rates were in women who were obese (BMI
> 30 points), and who had low overall strength levels @
baseline.
• Authors recommend identifying such patients early on for more
consistent intervention, as these patients are at higher risk of
low adherence.Ref:Lund LW, Ammitzbøll G, Hansen DG, Andersen EAW, Dalton SO. Adherence to a long-term progressive resistance training program, combining supervised and home-based
exercise for breast cancer patients during adjuvant treatment. Acta Oncol. 2019 May;58(5):650-657. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1560497. Epub 2019 Jan 30
11
12
DOES THE NUMBER OF EXERCISES IN A HEP IMPACT ADHERENCE?
Anecdotally, patients appear to report lower adherence rates
for complex, lengthy HEP’s
• An older study from 1998 in Physical Therapy compared
quality of performance for approx. 1 week between HEP’s of
2, 5, or 8 exercises.
• Review of exercise technique found that subjects assigned 2
exercises performed them more correctly vs those assigned 5
or 8 exercises.Ref: Henry KD, Rosemond C, Eckert L, Effect of Number of Home Exercises on Compliance and Performance in Adults Over 65 Years of Age. Physical Therapy . Volume 78 .
Number 3 . March 1998, 271-277
LOW BACK PAIN AND EXERCISE ADHERENCE
13
14
FIRST, LET’S RUN THE NUMBERS
When people think of home health patients, they do not always
think about chronic low back pain. However, data finds:
• An estimated 20% of adults adults 65 y/o or older report
suffering chronic low back pain.
• Those patients covered by Medicare or Medicaid had higher
odds ratios of reporting chronic low back pain
Ref: Shmagel A, Foley R, Hassan I. Epidemiology of Chronic Low Back Pain in US Adults: Data From the 2009–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arthritis
Care & Research. Vol. 68, No. 11, November 2016, pp 1688–1694. DOI 10.1002/acr.22890
FACTORS RELATING TO PROGRAM ADHERENCE IN STUDY OF 29 CLBPSUBJECTS
• Having > four exercises in the training program was considered
excessive.
• Many patients would stop an exercise if it caused pain, or was
perceived as not relieving pain.
• Having clear cut instructions.
• Routines perceived as boring or redundant showed lower adherence .
• Ref: Palazzo c , et al. Barriers to home-based exercise program adherence with chronic low back pain: Patient expectations regarding new technologies.
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 59 (2016) 107–113
15
16
WHAT CAN CLINICIANS DO TO IMPROVE ADHERENCE FOR THEIR LOW BACK PAIN PATIENTS?
The study made a number of recommendations including:
• Consider ways to provide video feedback of the
program to reinforce correct technique.
• Individualize advice/counselling to the patient.
• Individualize goals and objects to fit patient preferences.
TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE!
WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING DID NOT IMPROVE ADHERENCE TO HEP’S FOR DEMENTIA PATIENTS?
1. Loudly repeat exercise
instructions at least 3 times
per exercise
2. Include pictures of the
exercises
3. Provide emotional support.
SURVEY SAYS>>>
• It’s #1-this is NOT a
recommended technique to
improve HEP adherence for
patients dx with dementia.
17
18
CASE STUDY
86 y/o man, had refused PT consults on prior home care admissions.
Hats off to one of my RN’s, who persuaded the patient to at least
speak with me.
• Turned out his reluctance was related to a “bad experience I had
with PT at rehab. They wouldn’t listen to me and I got hurt”
• I asked him to talk about his goals (he did have some!). Obtained
his permission to teach a basic HEP. He agreed to try it.
• Met his wife 2 months after he was D/C, she reported he was still
adherent
A FEW WORDS ABOUT PATIENT ACTIVATION
Defined as ‘an individual’s knowledge, skill, and confidence
for managing their health and health care.”
Ref: Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M (2005). ‘Development
and testing of a short form of the Patient Activation Measure’. Health Services Research, vol 40, no 6, part 1, pp 1918–30.
19
20
OFTEN REFERENCED AS A SET OF SIX PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS
• Ability to self manage illness
• Ability to engage in health related activity
• Ability to be involved in Dx and Rx choices
• Able to collaborate with providers
• Able to select providers based on outcomes/quality
• Able to navigate the health care system.
Ref: Greene J, Hibbard J. Why Does Patient Activation Matter? An Examination of the Relationships Between Patient Activation and Health-Related Outcomes.
J Gen Intern Med 2011 27(5):520–6 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-011-1931-2
HOW IS PATIENT ACTIVATION ASSESSED?
One method is with the PAM (Patient activation Measure).
• This is a 13 item scale measuring responses to statements
about skills, beliefs, and confidence in managing one’s
health.
• Scores range from 0-100, with 4 broad categories of
classification
21
22
WHAT CAN YOU DO TO HELP IMPROVE YOUR PATIENT’S LEVEL OF ACTIVATION?
Studies suggest simple things that we can all do with our patients
to help foster activation:
• Help them plan concrete goals, starting with smaller,
attainable goals for folks you feel are lower on the activation
scale.
• Teach patients ways to monitor their progress or their overall
condition. Remember to use teach back/show back, to make
sure your patient can effectively use the information you
provide
23
24
THE THERAPEUTIC ALLIANCE-AN ESSENTIAL ELEMENT
Defined as “the working relationship or positive social connection between the
patient and the therapist and established between therapist and client through
collaboration, communication, therapist empathy, and mutual respect.”
Ref: Joyce AS, Ogrodniczuk JS, Piper WE, McCallum M. The alliance as mediator of expectancy effects
in short-term individual therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003;71:672–79. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.4.672
PHYSICAL THERAPY-SPECIFIC RESEARCH
Studies identify 4 essential elements for the Therapeutic Alliance :
1. Present
2. Receptive
3. Genuine
4. Committed
Ref: Miciak et al. The necessary conditions of engagement for the therapeutic relationship in physiotherapy: an interpretive description study. Archives of
Physiotherapy (2018) 8:3 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-018-0044-1
25
26
BEING PRESENT
“…. reflects physiotherapists’ and patients’ intentions
and abilities to be in-the-moment or embodied
in time and space.”
BEING RECEPTIVE
This characteristic requires 2 ingredients:
1. Open Attitude
2. Focused Receptivity
27
28
BEING GENUINE
Comprised of three elements:
1. The ability to be yourself
2. Honesty
3. Investing in the personal
COMMITTED
Committedness in this context refers to the therapists view
of their role and duty to be “all in” for the well being and
health of their patients.
Comprised of the 2 sub elements of :
1. Committed to Understanding
2. Committed to Action
29
30
SELF DISCLOSURE
SELF-DISCLOSURE: BENEFITS AND RISKS
Defined as “a planned intervention with the goal of enhancing
the clinician-patient relationship”
• Clinicians must be aware of the power imbalance in the
relationship they have with the patient.
• Done correctly, it can be effective at “to enhancing therapeutic
relationships, reducing power inequities between the client and
professional, normalizing the client’s experience
Ref: Steuber P, Pollard C. Building a Therapeutic Relationship: How Much is Too Much Self-Disclosure? International Journal of Caring Sciences. May-August
2018 Volume 11 | Issue 2| 651-656
31
32
CASE STUDY-USE OF SELF DISCLOSURE
This therapist has frequently found connection with certain
patients thru a ring I
wear on my right hand.
• The ring belonged to my father. It’s his Marine Corps ring. For
some reason, many older patients notice it and ask about it.
• The stories around the ring and my father’s service stories have
helped me connect to several hard to reach patients,
especially veterans.
FACTORS AROUND PATIENT MOTIVATION
33
34
THE IMPACT OF LOW MOTIVATION ON PATIENT ADHERENCE
Why are some patients seemingly unmotivated to
participate or adhere to your treatment program?
Theories about this include:
• Amotivation: based on self determination theory. The person is unable to provide clear-
cut reasons to explain their inaction.
• The pre-contemplative patient, based on Prochaska’s transtheoretical model.
Ref: Hardcastle S , et al. Motivating the unmotivated: how can health behavior be changed in those unwilling to change? Frontiers in
Psychology. 6 June 2015 doi: 10.3389 /fpsyg. 2015.00835
MI: A TECHNIQUE TO ADDRESS THE AMOTIVATED PATIENT
Motivational Interviewing: “Motivational interviewing is a
directive, client-centered counseling style for eliciting
behavior change by helping clients to explore and resolve
ambivalence. “
Ref: Miller WR, Rollnick S. Ten things that motivational interviewing is not.Behav Cogn Psychother. 2009 Mar;37(2):129-40. doi:
10.1017/S1352465809005128.
35
36
SPECIFIC MI STRATEGIES
Re -framing: Clinician offers a possible new meaning when
patient denies a problem.
• Example: “My spouse thinks I’m unsteady and nags me about
it, but I don’t have any problems getting around” (when patient
is visibly unsteady and has had falls). How might you re -
frame this?
“It sounds like your spouse really cares about you and is
concerned, although it is expressed in a way that makes you
upset. “
OVERSHOOTING/UNDERSHOOTING
These are techniques where the clinician can reflect back what the
patient has said to them but adjust it with use of low or high intensity
words.
Example of overshooting:
• Patient: “I don’t like the way my husband nags me about being
unsteady”
• Clinician: “It sounds like you’re really mad at your husband”
• The patient may back pedal such as : “Well, not really mad, just bugs
me sometimes”
37
38
LOOKING FORWARD
Technique which asks the patient to consider their future
both with and also without the desired adherence to a
health strategy.
1. What do you think your life might look like in 5 years if
you do not make this change?
2. What do you think your life might look like in 5 years if
you do make this change?
HEALTH LITERACY AND ADHERENCE
• Health Literacy as defined by
the IHI is “the degree to which
individuals can obtain, process,
and understand the basic
information and services they
need to make appropriate
health decisions.”
Ref: http://www.ihi.org/communities/blogs/8-ways-to-improve-
health-literacy
39
40
ACCORDING TO THE CDC---
WHAT CAN BE DONE TO IMPROVE HEALTH LITERACY?
The IHI recommends:
• Use simple language
• Use teach back/show back
method
• Include pictures/graphics such
as stop light tools
• Speak slowly enough for
patient to follow you
• Use open ended questions
41
42
TOOLS TO ASSESS HEALTH LITERACY
A great repository for health literacy assessments can be found
here:
• http://healthliteracy.bu.edu/
• It contains at least 191 different health literacy and numeracy
tests.
EXAMPLE: BRIEF HEALTH LITERACY SCREENING TOOL
• Sample question:
How often do you have a problem understanding what is
told to you about your medical condition?
1. Always
2. Often
3. Sometimes
4. Occasionally
5. Never
BRIEF Score Skills and Abilities
Limited 4-12 Not able to read most low literacy health materials; will need repeated oral
instructions; materials should be composed of illustrations or video tapes. Will need
low literacy materials; may not be able to read a prescription label.
Marginal 13-16 May need assistance; may struggle with patient education materials.
Adequate 17-20 Will be able to read and comprehend most patient education materials.
Ref: Haun J, Luther S, Dodd V, Donaldson P. Measurement variation across health literacy assessments:
implications for assessment selection in research and practice. J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3:141-
59. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.712615
43
44
SHARED DECISION MAKING (SDM)
1. At least 2 parties involved
2. Both participate in treatment decision
process
3. Information sharing is pre requisite
4. Both parties discuss preferences
5. Both parties agree on treatment decision
Ref:2 Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision making in the physician patient encounter-revisiting the shared
treatment decision making model. SocSci Med. 1999. 49;651-661
BENEFITS FOR THE PATIENT IN SDM
Studies show patients reporting
multiple benefits when treating
clinicians use a SDM approach
with them. These include:
• More realistic expectations
• Less decisional conflict
• Increased adherence
• Greater satisfaction
Ref:Elwyn et al. Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences
Implementation Science (2016) 11:114DOI 10.1186/s13012-016-0480-9
45
46
RESEARCH ON SHARED DECISION MAKING UTILIZATION
MOST OFTEN STUDIED USING O.P.T.I.O.N.
• The clinician assesses patient’s
preferred approach to receiving
information to assist decision making
(e.g. discussion in consultations, read
printed material, assess graphical
data, use videotapes or other media)
SCALE OF RESPONSES
• 0 There is no attempt to perform the behaviour
• 1 There is a perfunctory or unclear attempt to perform the
behaviour
• 2 The behaviour is performed at baseline skill level
• 3 The behaviour is performed to a good standard
• 4 The behaviour is performed to a high standard
Ref: Coue”t N, et al. Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision
making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Health
Expectations, 18, pp.542–561
EXAMPLES OF SDM BEHAVIORS FROM O.P.T.I.O.N.
• The clinician states that there is more than one way to deal
with the identified problem (‘equipoise’)
• The clinician explores the patient’s concerns (fears) about how
the problem(s) are to be managed.
• The clinician checks that the patient has understood the
information.
• The clinician lists ‘options’, which can include the choice of ‘no
action’.
47
48
HOW OFTEN IS SDM USED CLINICALLY?
Many clinicians fail to use SDM. One large review of various
medical practitioners found:
• A majority of studies reported an average total score <25.
(0-100 scale)
• The two least-observed behaviors were assessing the patient’s
preferred approach and eliciting preferred involvement.
• Good news! SDM can be learned and when clinicians were
given teaching, scores improved to > 50.
SDM USE BY PHYSICAL THERAPISTS
13 PT’s participated. A total of 210 consultations were assessed using OPTION and
the Control Preference Scale (CPS).
• I prefer to make the treatment decisions on my own.
• I prefer to make the treatment decisions after hearing the opinion of the therapist.
• I prefer to share the treatment decisions with the therapist.
• I prefer the therapist to make the treatment decisions after hearing my opinion.
• I prefer to leave the decisions to the therapist.
Ref: Dierckx K. et al, Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Physical Therapy: Observed Level of Involvement and Patient
Preference. Physical Therapy 2013. Volume 93 Number 10 1321-1330.
49
50
SO HOW DID THE PT’S DO?
• Vast majority of consultations showed only perfunctory or
unclear attempts to perform the SDM behaviors.
• Mean OPTION score was only 5.2% (on 0-100% range).
Ugh!
• In only 28% of the cases, did the PT’s correctly gauge the
patient’s preferred level of autonomy in the decision
making process.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE USE OF SDM
1. Draw attention to a problem that needs a decision.
2. Share information by listing all of the different options
and exploring the concerns and ideas of the patient.
3. Indicate the need for a decision-making stage.
51
52
TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE
Which of the following is true regarding health literacy?
1. Health literacy refers to how well a patient can
pronounce the names of their pills.
2. Patients health literacy improves when you talk to them
using technical jargon.
3. Teach back and show back are proven methods to raise
health literacy.
THE ROLE OF TECH
53
54
CAN TECHNOLOGY HELP ENHANCE ADHERENCE TO EXERCISE PROGRAMS?
• A review of 22 studies found 10 directly comparing traditional
exercise programs to technology-based programs.
• Interestingly, both types of exercise showed high adherence
rates in the study (91% vs 83%), with tech-based programs
coming out on top regardless of other factors.
• Many of the tech-based programs used gaming software to
enhance participant enjoyment
Ref:Valenzuela T Okubo Y, Woodbury A, Lord SR, Delbaere K. Adherence to Technology-Based Exercise Programs in Older Adults. A Systematic Review.J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2018
Jan/Mar;41(1):49-61. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000095.
USE OF AN APP VERSUS HAND –WRITTEN HEP
Australian study involving 80 patients with LLMSD’s-half received a
paper handout of their HEP-half received the HEP on an app plus f/u
phone calls and motivational texts.
• Self reported adherence at 4 weeks favored the app group by
approx. 11%
• Overall functional improved in the app group by average of 8% >
vs the control group
• Other secondary outcomes did not approach significance
Ref: Lambert TE, et al. An app with remote support achieves better adherence to home exercise programs than paper handouts in people with musculoskeletal conditions: a
randomised trial. J Physiother. 2017 Jul;63(3):161-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 Jun 26
55
56
IN CONCLUSION……
• The problem of patient adherence to care is multi faceted
• We have multiple strategies at our disposal to improve the
chances of our patient being a full participant in their care.
• However, we have a ways to go in terms of fully utilizing these
strategies.
• Universities should increase emphasis on these techniques when
providers are in training.
THANKS FOR LISTENING IN!
57
58