energy-based inelastic hardness of soda-lime silicate glassintrinsic strength of soda-lime glass: ~...
TRANSCRIPT
Energy-Based Inelastic Hardness ofSoda-Lime Silicate Glass
Satoshi YOSHIDASatoshi YOSHIDA 1, 21, 2, , Hiroshi SAWASATO Hiroshi SAWASATO 1, 21, 2,,
Masanori YOSHIKAWA Masanori YOSHIKAWA 11, , Jun MATSUOKA Jun MATSUOKA 1, 21, 2
1 Department of Materials Science,The University of Shiga Prefecture, Hikone, Shiga, JAPAN
2 Center for Glass Science and Technology, The University of Shiga Prefecture, Hikone, Shiga, JAPAN
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
Contents1. Background
Indentation impression of glass… What is a permanent deformation of glass ?… Densification and Shear flow of glass
2. Experimental procedure
3. Results and Discussion
4. Summary> Energy based hardness depends on a shape of indenter. > Energy required to create a unit volume of indentation
varies with contribution of densification.
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
1. Background
Permanent deformation of glass
2. Experimental procedure
3. Results and Discussion
4. Summary
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
1. Background Indentation impression of glass
Peter (1970)
Shear lines !
Ball indentation on soda-lime glass(radius = 80 µm, load = 1100 gf)
Plastic flow or Densification ?
Ball indentation on soda-lime glass(radius = 20 µm, load = 100 gf)
The contrast arises from an increase in refractive index.
Densification !
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
Silica glass : After unloading(Vickers indentation)
500 1000
Center of indentation
Outside
Wavenumber (cm–1)
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Raman spectra of silica glass.(Indentation load = 1 N)
492 cm-1
430 cm-1
0.1 MPa
Quenched from ~ 30GPa
Hemley et al.(1986)
Raman spectra of silica glass under high hydrostatic pressures
1. Background Indentation impression of glass
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
1. Background Indentation impression of glass
Indentation profileAnnealing
Densified volumeTg ×0.9, 2 h
Relaxation time for viscous flow is long enough.
24
62
µm
4
6
0
-0 2
0 2µm
24
62
µm
4
6
0
-0 2
0 2µm
Discrimination of densified volume from total indentation volumeMackenzie(1969), Yoshida (2001, 2005)
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
after annealing (at Tg X 0.9)
500 1000
Center of indentation
Outside
Wavenumber (cm–1)
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Raman spectra of silica glass.(Indentation load = 1 N)
492 cm-1
430 cm-1
500 1000
Center of indentation
Outside
Wavenumber (cm–1)
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Silica glass : before annealing
1. Background Indentation impression of glass
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
1. Background Indentation impression of glass
The previous work Yoshida, Sangleboeuf, Rouxel (2005), J. Mater. Res. 20, p. 3404.
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.50
102030405060708090
100
Vol
ume
ratio
of r
ecov
ery,
VR (%
)
Poisson's ratio
Silica
BMG
YBC6
1. Various kinds of glasses, including silica, oxynitride(YBC6), metallic glass(BMG), undergo densification under an indenter.
2. Volume recovery (densifiedvolume) decreases with increasing Poisson’s ratio of glass.
3. The indentation volume provides important information on inelastic deformation of glass.
Soda-lime glass
Densification cannot be ignored for oxide glasses.
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
In order to get insight into inelastic deformation of glass
1. With different indenters, depth-sensing indentation experiments (Load-unload tests) are performed for soda-lime silicate glass.
2. Energy-based hardness, which is calculated from the inelastic work of indentation and the residual indentation volume by using an SPM, is obtained.
Objectives of this work
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
1. Background
2. Experimental procedure3. Results and Discussion
4. Summary
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
2. Experimental procedure
2-1. Depth-sensing indentation
Denpth-sensing indenter: Shimadzu DUH-201
Diamond indenter: Vickers, Berkovich, Cube-corner
Indentation load : 50 mN ~ 400 mN
Loading and unloading rates : 14 mN/s
Sample:Soda-lime glass(Matsunami S-0050)
Ur: Inelastic hysteresis loop energy, Ue: Elastic stored energy, Ut (=Ur+Ue): Total energy to create an indentation impression at Pmax
Ur Ue
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
2. Experimental procedure
2-2. Measurement of residual impression volume
Scanning probe microscope(SPM): Veeco Nanoscope E
Conditions of Image aquisition: Contact modeScan area 5 µm2 ~ 15 µm2
V +: Pile-up volume V ̶ : Indentation volume
24
62
µm
4
6
0
-0 2
0 2µm
V+
V-
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
2. Experimental procedure
2-3. Energy-based inelastic hardness
V+
V-
)(m area Projected(N)LoadhardnessMeyer 2=
Meyer hardness is an Elastoplastic workto create a unit volume of maximum indentation volume.
)(m volume,nIndentatio(J)energy,loop Inelastic hardness inelastic basedEnergy 3-
r
VU
=
Ur Ue
Energy based inelastic hardness is an Inelastic work to create a unit volume of residual indentation volume.
M. Sakai, Acta Metall. Mater., 41, 1751 (1993)N.A. Stilwell and D. Tabor, Proc. Phys. Soc. 78, 169 (1961)
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
1. Background
2. Experimental procedure
3.Results and Discussion4. Summary
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
3. Results and DiscussionLoad-depth curves of soda-lime glass using different indenters
0 1 20
100
200
300
400
Load
/mN
Depth /µm
Vickers Berkovich Cube-corner
Elastic recovery of Cube-corner indentation is small as compared with other indentations.Glass behaves like a metal under a Cube-corner, but has some cracks.
0 1 20
100
200
300
400
Depth /µm
Load
/mN
0 1 2 3 4 50
100
200
300
400
Load
/mN
Depth /µm
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
3. Results and DiscussionLoad-depth curves of soda-lime glass using different indenters
The indenter which has the larger face angle, β, shows deeper penetration.
0 1 2 3 4 50
100
200
300
400
Load
/mN
Depth /µm
Vickers
Berkovich
CubeCorner
βV = 22.0 º βB = 24.7 ºβC = 54.7 º
cf. Geometrical factors of indenter, g : Apro = g h2
gV= 24.5, gB= 24.5, gc= 2.6Apro : Projected area, h : depth
VickersBerkovich
Cube-corner
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
3. Results and DiscussionSPM image of residual impression
Using the maximum depth, hmax=0.54 µm, from load-depth curve and the contact depth , hc=0.44 µm, from the diagonal of impression, the surface geometrical factor, γ (= hmax /hc), is estimated to be 1.23.
Vickers 50 mN
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
3. Results and DiscussionSPM image of residual impression
The surface geometrical factor, γ (= hmax /hc), is 1.29.
Berkovich 50 mN
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
3. Results and DiscussionSPM image of residual impression
The surface geometrical factor: γ ~ 1No sinking-in
Cube-corner 50 mN
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
3. Results and DiscussionEnergy based inelastic hardness
Meyer hardness(from maximum depth @ 400 mN )
Vickers: 4.4 GPaBerkovich: 3.3 GPaCube-corner: 6.8 GPa
Inelastic hardness with a Cube-corner is larger than those with other indenters.
Inelastic hardness >> Meyer hardness
0 100 200 300 400 5008
10
12
14
16
Indentation load /mN
Inel
astic
har
dnes
s /G
Pa Cube-corner
Vickers
Berkovich
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
3. Results and DiscussionAnnealing recovery (Relaxation of densified volume)
Vickers 100 mN
Densified volume
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
3. Results and DiscussionAnnealing recovery (Relaxation of densified volume)
Sharp indenter:Less recoveryLess densification
Cube-corner 100 mN
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
3. Results and DiscussionEnergy based inelastic hardness
Pressure onset for hydrostatically densification of soda-lime glass:
~ 8 GPa
Inelastic hardness is an inelastic work to create a unit volume of residual impression.
Inelastic hardness: ~ 14GPa > Inelastic hardness: ~ 12GPa(Cube-corner) (Vickers, Berkovich)
Shear flow only Shear flow(20%) + Densification(80%)
Shear flow is a bond-breakage process.
Intrinsic strength of soda-lime glass:~ 10 GPa
(two-point bending of fiber)
The difference of inelastic hardness stems fromShear flow energy > Densification energy
S. Yoshida et al., J. Mater. Res., 20, 3404 (2005)
See Poster Presentation, M. Inoue et al. H. Ji et al., Scrip. Mater., 55, 1159 (2006)
The University of Shiga Prefecture
FFAG4, 2007, Shiga, JAPAN
4. Summary1. Hardness is an energy required to create a unit
volume of residual indentation impression.
2. Energy-based inelastic hardness depends on a shape of indenter.
Hardness (Cube-corner) > Hardness (Vickers or Berkovich)
3. Deformation mechanism changes with a shape of indenter.
Shear flow (Sharp indenter) Densification (Blunt indenter)
4. Energy-based inelastic hardness varies with contribution of densification beneath an indenter.