energy and value added products from marine …...the literature review of each relevant field...
TRANSCRIPT
Energy and Value Added Products from Marine
biomass and Wasteland Derived biomass
Ph.D Synopsis
Submitted to
Gujarat Technological University, Ahmedabad
For the degree
of
Doctor of Philosophy
in
Chemical Engineering (Specialization Renewable Energy)
by
Prasanta Das
Enrolment No.: 139997105007
(2017)
Supervisor:
Dr. Subarna Maiti, Sr. Scientist, PDEC,
CSIR-CSMCRI, Bhavnagar, Gujarat
Doctoral Progress Committee Members
Dr. Parimal Paul Chief Scientist,
Head in Analytical
CSIR-CSMCRI
Bhavnagar
Dr. M. Shyam (Retired)
Director in SPRERI,
V.V. Nagar, Anand
Dr.Piyush B. Vanzara
(New)
Associate Professor,
VVP Eng. College
Rajkot
2
Contents
Page no.
1. Abstract 3 – 4
2. Introduction
2.1 General introduction 5
2.2 Review of earlier research works in the relevant field 6 – 7
3. Objective and scope of the work 7
4. Brief description of the present work in the relevant field 7
5. Characterization methods to determine fuel suitability of selected biomass 8 – 9
6. Case studies of harnessing energy from wasteland biomass and seaweed
(macroalgal biomass)
6.1 Utilization of Jatropha curcas shells for energy 9
6.1.1 Brief description of both the gasification and pyrolysis. 9 – 10
6.2 Thermochemical conversion of Kappaphycus alvarezii granules
seaweed for energy.
11
6.2.1 Brief description of both the gasification and pyrolysis. 11 – 13
6.3 Harnessing energy from other seaweeds: Ulva fasciata, Gracilaria
corticata, Sargassum tenerrimum
13 – 14
6.3.1 Brief description of the production of bio-oil through slow
pyrolysis process with Arrheniuous kinetic model
14 – 15
7. Conclusion 15 – 16
8. Publications 17
9. Patent 17
10. References 18 – 19
3
1. Abstract
With increasing energy consumption day to day around the world coupled with ever
increasing global pollution level in the atmosphere with high carbon footprints, several
technologies with low carbon footprints comprising of pyrolysis, gasification, combustion,
liquefaction and steam gasification have emerged. The present study has focussed on three
technologies pyrolysis, gasification, and steam gasification of selected wasteland biomass and
seaweed biomass. Fuel characterization of both genres of biomass predicted the suitability in
thermochemical conversion processes for each type of biomass considered. For experimental
validation, some case studies were investigated. Jatropha curcas shells was considered as an
important wasteland biomass in the view of ongoing Institutional activities on jatropha bio-
diesel and wasteland development. Firstly, the gasification of Jatropha curcas shells was
investigated in a 10 kW downdraft gasifier. For this, a thorough fuel characterization of the
shells was carried out. The gasifier was connected to a 100% producer gas engine and
continuous power generation (~10 kWe) was achieved with overall efficiency of 24.5%.
Secondly, the pyrolysis of the shells was also demonstrated in a fixed bed reactor to produce
bio-oil at the temperatures of 300, 400, 500, and 600°C. The bio-chars from the experiments
were evaluated and steam gasification of the chars demonstrated a H2 rich ‗syn-gas‘.
Complete thermochemical characterization was also carried out for 10 other wasteland
biomass. For marine macroalgae, a detailed thermochemical study was carried out for
Kappaphycus alvarezii granules. The biomass was investigated in four different kinetic
models (i) multilinear regression technique, (ii) Friedman method, (iii) Flynn-Wall-Ozawa
(FWO) (iv) Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose (KAS) methods and the kinetic parameters at
different heating rates were evaluated. The results were compared with terrestrial biomass -
sawdust. Like jatropha shells, Kappaphycus granules were gasified and pyrolyzed separately
and the products characterized. Three other macroalgae, namely Ulva fasciata, Gracilaria
corticata, Sargassum tenerrimum were utilized as a potential source of pyrolytic bio-oil. The
kinetic study was done for optimizing the temperature zone in which the pyrolysis
experiment was to be conducted. The characteristics of bio-oils and bio-chars too were
investigated. The graphical abstract of the present study is shown below:
Non-conventional biomass for energy
Wasteland derived biomass Seaweeds
Jatropha
shells
Cassia
auriculata
Cassia
tora
Jatropha
gossypifolia
Dichanthium
annulatum
Sphaeranthus
indicus
Eclipta
alba
Desmostachya
bipinnata
Solanum
xanthocarpum Sargassum
tenerrimum
Gracilaria
corticata
Ulva
fasciata
Kappaphycus
alvarezii
Butea
monosperm
a
Prosopis
juliflora
Characterization as solid fuel for thermochemical conversion
process including determination of kinetic parameters
Downdraft gasification
of jatropha shells
Slow pyrolysis of
jatropha shells for bio-oil
production
Two stage thermochemical
process for H2 generation from
jatropha shells
Downdraft gasification of
Kappaphycus alvarezii
granules
Slow pyrolysis of
other seaweed species
Thermochemical case
studies
Upgradation of bio-oil Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies
4
2. Introduction
2.1 General introduction
The salient feature of this PhD thesis to explore the vast potential of renewable energy
especially bio-energy because conventional energy sources are limited and the consumption
of energy has increased rapidly leading to exhaustion of availability very soon. The burning
of the fossil fuels can cause several deleterious effects on environment-related issues.
Renewable energy sources such as solar energy, bio-energy, etc. are available to reduce stress
on conventional energy sources. The deployment of these energy sources would produce less
emission than conventional energy sources [1 – 9]. The present work lays ample stress on the
introduction of energy scenario for both world and India.
The chapter one of the thesis describes the general introduction of energy scenario in the
world and India. This general introduction also includes the different thermochemical
technologies such as gasification, pyrolysis, combustion, kinetic study through
thermogravimetic analysis, and steam gasification of char or biomass.
Gasification is defined as the partial oxidation of solid fuel at elevated temperature that
produces syn-gas mainly composed of CO, H2, and CH4. This technology opts for converting
solid fuel to convenient gaseous form which is easy to manage in the downstream process.
For example, this gas can directly be utilized in gas turbine, engine for producing electricity,
etc. The major feedstock in gasifier is solid fuel and the gasifying agents are generally air or
pure oxygen, and some others gasifying agents are CO2, and steam. These gasifying agents
highly influence the product yield quality and quantity of syn-gas and calorific value. For
example, the calorific value is the highest for a gasifier when gasifying agent is pure oxygen
followed by air, while for carbon dioxide and steam gasification; the calorific value of syn-
gas is more for the former.
Pyrolysis is defined as the conversion of solid fuel into liquid, gas, and char or ash in absence
of air or inert atmosphere at elevated temperature. Based on the final product yield, pyrolysis
is classified into slow, medium, fast and flash pyrolysis. In case of slow pyrolysis, the major
products are liquid, gas, and bio-char and heating rate is also very less, while fast pyrolysis
occurs within 1 to 2 s and major product is liquid or bio-oil. Finally, flash pyrolysis occurs in
less than 1 s and the major product is bio-oil with better yield than fast pyrolysis. Combustion
is also another technology which produces carbon dioxide and heat. Steam gasification of
5
6
biomass produces hydrogen rich syn-gas which has more calorific value than conventional
syn-gas.
2.2 Review of earlier research works in the relevant field
The literature review of each relevant field comprising of the thermochemical conversion of
biomass, gasification, pyrolysis, thermogravimetric analysis, and steam gasification of
biomass is done in the present study. First of all, the thermochemical conversion of biomass
is abridged as literature survey one. The thermochemical routes are gasification, pyrolysis,
liquefaction, and combustion. The chemical composition of biomass is extremely important
prior to harnessing energy by thermochemical route. It was found from the literature survey
that terrestrial biomass having high cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin content is most
suitable for a thermochemical process, while marine algae have no lignin content and has low
cellulose and hemicellulose. So, for this marine biomass hydrothermal liquefaction or
pyrolysis may be a good option for extracting energy and value added chemicals. So based on
the chemical constituents of any biomass, the selection of some thermochemical routes have
been explored in the present work.
The second literature survey is based on gasification technology. This literature survey
extensively deals with the processes comprising of the different types of gasifiers, such as
downdraft, updraft, fluidized bed, bubbling fluidized bed, and entrained bed gasifier. Apart
from the different types of gasifiers, its operating fundamentals are also described with the
outlet gas cleaning systems.
The third literature survey contains pyrolysis of different feedstocks ranging from terrestrial
to marine biomass. The products from pyrolysis comprising of bio-oil, syn-gas, and bio-char
are delineated here. Bio-char utilized in various applications such as soil amendment,
fertilizer, fuel are also elaborated here. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis is mentioned in this
literature survey. The pyrolysis process depends on the heating rate and final temperature and
the physical and chemical properties of biomass. The reaction mechanism is elaborated in the
present study. The probable chemical composition of bio-oil after splitting of individual
chemical species cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin along with the characterization of bio-
oil is also studied. The literature survey of pyrolysis comprises terrestrial or woody type
biomass, and marine algae.
The fourth literature survey deals with kinetic study of solid biomass for thermochemical
process for evaluating the kinetic parameters under different models. The pyrolysis
7
mechanism of solid biomass is best described by the kinetic study promoted to identify exact
temperature zone for selecting the optimum temperature of pyrolysis. There are different
methods available for analysing solid state kinetic and some of them are model free
isothermal Friedman, and model free non-isothermal Flynn-Wall and Ozawa, and Kissinger–
Akahira–Sunose.
Fifth literature survey illustrates steam gasification of bio-char or biomass. Bio-char derived
from biomass at certain temperature was surveyed and effects of catalysts, steam flow rate,
temperature were studied. The purpose of choosing steam gasification for solid biomass is to
convert biomass to gaseous form having high calorific value and it is the best technology for
clean energy production.
The literature survey mainly highlights the different thermochemical routes of biomass
conversion to find out a suitable technology for extracting energy and value added chemicals.
3. Objective and Scope of the work
The wasteland derived biomass and marine macro algae are a potential source for extracting
energy and valuable chemicals as these kinds of biomass can be exploited for
thermochemical routes or biochemical routes instead of burning directly in situ. Direct
burning is an uncontrolled way of incineration which has negative impact on soil,
environment and culminates in soot particles in the atmosphere [10 – 12]. So, efficient and
technical methods should be designed to convert the biomass into energy. For this appropriate
method such as gasification, pyrolysis, and steam gasification technology are of principal
importance.
4. Brief description of the present work in the relevant field
To harness energy from wasteland products and marine biomass from various feedstocks by
suitable thermochemical conversion routes, the selected biomasses were characterized by
different methods as shown in Figure 1. Jatropha shells were gasified for energy in a typical
downdraft gasifier and power generated by a 10 kW engine using 100% producer gas engine.
The production of bio-oil from the same biomass was investigated and the oil was later
upgraded by an organic reaction. Jatropha shell chars were also steam gasified for H2 rich
syn-gas generation. Several other wasteland biomasses were also characterized. For marine
biomass, after obtaining sap from the red alga Kappaphycus alvarezii, it was dried and
8
crushed into Kappaphycus alvarezii granules (KAG) and then utilized for energy application
in gasifier for syn-gas production to run an engine for electricity generation. Pyrolysis for
bio-oil production and the kinetic studies were done. Three other macroalgae named Ulva
fasciata, Gracilaria corticata, and Sargassum tenerrimum were investigated for bio-oil
production by slow pyrolysis process and Arrhenius approach was used for kinetic studies.
5. The characterization methods to determine fuel suitability of selected biomass
This chapter highlights the detailed characterization procedure of selected biomass as a solid
fuel in thermochemical process. The introduction part elucidates about the different class of
wasteland derived biomass and its productivity throughout the year and location from where
these biomasses have been cultivated. The biomass samples were collected from these
locations for further processing such as drying, sizing into small pieces, grinding to powder
form. For characterization of this biomass as a solid fuel, several analyses are briefly
described here. Proximate and ultimate analyses are the most important parameters for any
solid fuel. The, calorific value has been determined for each biomass.
Biomass/bio-char
Pre-processing such as drying,
sizing, grinding of solid biomass
Proximate analysis
Ultimate analysis
Ash fusion test
Fibre estimation
ICP analysis for
determination of
ash composition
Calorific value
(CV) analysis
FT-IR
analysis
DSC
analysis
TGA
analysis
CHNS
analysis
XRD
analysis
The obtained bio-oil
from pyrolysis process
FT-IR, GC-MS,
CHNS, CV
For determination of syn-gas
from gasification or pyrolysis
Online producer
analyzer/portable
gas analyzer
pH ,Viscosity, Density, Refractive
index, moisture
9
FIGURE 1: Schematic diagram of different analysis being carried out in different
instrument.
Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of different analysis that has been investigated using
different analyzers or instruments. The solid samples such as biomasses were analysed for
fibre estimation, FT-IR, TGA, DSC, CV (calorific value) and CHNS, while bio-chars were
characterized by the above same methods except fibre estimation. The ash composition or ash
of the biomass was analysed by ICP, XRD, and ash fusion test. For bio-oil characterization
pH, FT-IR, GC-MS, CHNS, CV, viscosity, density, refractive index and moisture analysis
was done. The syn-gas composition from gasification, steam gasification, and pyrolysis was
determined by the online producer gas analyzer. Finally, indices such as alkali index, base-to-
acid ratio, and bed agglomeration index were established from earlier literatures based on the
ash composition of biomass which is an important part of this study.
6. Case studies of harnessing energy from wasteland biomass and seaweed (macroalgal
biomass)
6.1 Utilization of Jatropha curcas shells for energy
The jatropha shell is the outer cover of its fruit and it is shrub type plant mainly grown in
marginal lands and hence can be classified under wasteland biomass. The whole fruit
comprises of shell, kernel, and seed. The kernel is a white part that covers the seed. This seed
is most commonly utilized for the production of bio-diesel in commercial application. CSIR-
CSMCRI has developed an integrated bio-diesel demonstration plant and it is a patented
process [13, 14]. In this process, the total electrical energy requirement is 500 kWh, and
furnace oil requirement is 50 kg to avail the following products starting from 6.06 t/day dry
jatropha fruit: 1 t jatropha biodiesel; 0.08 t neat glycerol; 2.54 t oil cake; 0.056 t soap cake;
0.022 t potassium sulphate; 2 t empty shells. The jatropha shells are rich in calorific value and
the power and steam requirement can be met from the shells. The requirement of jatropha
shells would be around 0.85 – 0.90 t as underscored in the present study. So naturally the rest
of jatropha shells ca. 1.1 t can be utilized for the bio-oil production which could meet the
requirement of electrical energy for the fixed bed reactor. Thus the whole process would be
sustainable. This is the core target of this study.
10
6.1.1 Brief description of both the gasification and pyrolysis
The gasification of jatropha shells was demonstrated in a typical downdraft gasifier with feed
rate 15 kg h-1
and it was connected to a 100% producer gas 10 kW engine and the
performances were investigated in this study. The basic feedstock of this present study was
empty shells having calorific value quite good 17.2 MJ kg-1
. The calorific value of producer
gas was found to be 5.2 MJ m-3
measured by a potable gas analyzer. Efficiency of 64.8% was
achieved over 8 h continuous operations. The engine performance was demonstrated in a
100% producer gas engine with overall efficiency of 24.5%. Thus, the captive power could
be obtained and can be utilized to tackle the need for external sources of power for the
operations of deshelling, screw pressing, oil refining, transesterification, glycerol purification,
and soap making in the integrated bio-diesel production process from the whole dry fruits.
The intermediate producer gas has added advantages as it provides thermal energy for the
process.
FIGURE 2: Schematic diagram of the whole process of jatropha curcas shells for
gasification and pyrolysis.
Again, these jatropha shells were utilized for the production of bio-oil by slow pyrolysis
process in a fixed bed reactor. The moisture free bio-oil was subsequently upgraded by a
Jatropha
curcas shells
Characterization as
solid fuel in
thermochemical
conversion process
Pyrolysis in a fixed
bed reactor
Gasification in a 10
kW gasifier adjoined
with 100% producer
gas engine
Overall efficiency
engine performances
evaluated
The sustainability of the
whole process calculated
The obtained bio-oil
moisture freed and
characterized
Upgraded bio-oil
obtained by an organic
reaction
Bio-char
Steam
gasification
11
simple organic reaction. In order to avail of the maximum productivity of the bio-oil, reaction
was carried out at temperatures of 300, 400, 500 and 600°C. The kinetic study indicated the
suitable heating rate was 5°C min-1
. The optimum result was found at 400°C, with yield of
31.14%, and with a holding time of 4 h. From the FT-IR and GC-MS analysis, the bio-oil
containing ca. 40% carbonyl (>C = O) derivatives, was converted into the corresponding
methylene (-CH2-) derivative by an organic reaction with hydrazine hydrate/sodium hydrate.
Thus, the resultant oil, containing mostly ethylbenzene, had a high calorific value of 50 MJ
kg-1
. It might be suitable to replace fossil diesel or gasoline. The obtained bio-chars at the
different temperatures were characterized for their potential use as a solid fuel. The whole
process is shown in Figure 2.
6.2 Thermochemical conversion of Kappaphycus alvarezii granules (KAG) seaweed for
energy
The brief introduction of Kappaphycus alvarezii granules is presented below. The
Kappaphycus alvarezii seaweed belongs to the genre of red alga (Rhodophyta). The
generation of bio-oil from marine seaweeds have been engaging the attention as a third-
generation biofuel, in the recent times. Marine seaweed has immense potential to produce
bio-energy to be utilized in commercial purposes due to it fast growth, high photosynthesis
efficiency, no requirement of cultivable land, and no competition with food crops. Another
excellent characteristic of seaweed is sequestering the CO2 from atmosphere as it is growing
primarily in intertidal coastal water. This marine seaweed can be readily converted into
biofuels through suitable biochemical or thermochemical routes [15, 16]. Kappaphycus
alvarezii is a red alga, which is generally commercially cultivated for the linear sulfated
polysaccharide, κ-carrageenan. CSIR-CSMCRI had pioneered a process to obtain two
products in an integrated way from seaweed [17, 18]. The alga is harvested and then collected
to crush to expel sap (a liquid plant stimulant). The whole solid mass is then centrifuged to
separate ―sap‖ and the solid residue left as seaweed granules. The detailed compositions of
the fresh seaweed sap and granules are already reported [17]. Several field trials of ―sap‖ as a
foliar spray in a variety of crops has indicated enhanced growth and product yields in diverse
geographical locations across India. So taking advantage of extended coastal line, large
multitude of this biomass is thus required to fulfil the ―sap‖ production requirement for the
country. Hence the present study explores most suitable thermochemical pathway which
should be adopted by converting the high volume residual granules to convenient gaseous or
12
bio-oil form to make the ―sap‖ production process standalone and energy efficient. So to
attain this objective, the kinetic study was initiated in the present investigation. For this,
selected models were employed for analysing the solid-state kinetic data obtained from TGA,
and through kinetic study to further to explore the devolatization process.
6.2.1 Brief description of both the pyrolysis through different models and gasification
The present study reports the kinetic behaviour of granules using thermogravimetric analysis
(TGA), at different heating rates 5, 10, 15, and 20 k min-1
in N2 atmosphere and the evolving
gaseous products being analysed by the thermogravimetric-mass spectrometry (TG-MS).
Sawdust was considered for the comparative study as it is a lignocellulogic biomass. The
selected four models (i) multiliear regression technique, (ii) Friedman method, (iii) Flynn-
Wall-Ozawa (FWO) method, and (iv) Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose (KAS) method were utilized
to evaluate the apparent activation energy, the pre-exponential factor, and the overall reaction
order. From the TG-MS study, the maximum SO2 peak was observed at 300°C and 950°C
which indicated that slow pyrolysis at 500°C, with a packed bed lime scrubber at the outlet
during temperature rise, was the best thermochemical pathway for energy harnessing.
Characterization of the seaweed was done in order to determine how the different parameters
affected the degree of ease with which the biomass can be ignited and subsequently used as
an energy source. Sawdust exhibited more VM (volatile matter) and FC (fixed carbon) than
KAG, thus making it a better fuel. The calorific value for KAG and sawdust were 9.19 MJ
kg-1
and 17.76 MJ kg-1
, respectively. The presence of mineral content also affected the
thermochemical behaviour of seaweed. The mineral content was also analysed for both acidic
and basic content in the present study. An attempt was made for the gasification of KAG in a
typical downdraft gasifier that was used previously [19] having feed rate 15 kg h-1
. The
gasifier and 10 kW engine were operated for 2 h at a continuous full load. However, during
entire operation, SOx emissions were noticed. Gasification required high temperature 700 –
900°C and this is most likely to yield substantial sulphur oxide emissions according to TG-
MS result. So in these circumstances, it was advisable to avoid the gasification of KAG
because of the corrosive nature of syn-gas. After 2 h run, the performance of gasifier
deteriorated gradually and sufficient power could not be generated even when fresh charge of
seaweed was provided because of the formation of soft lumps which probably had prevented
further downward flow of KAG. The ash content of the granules along with their fluffy
nature was apparently the contributing factor behind its improper fuel response.
13
FIGURE 3: Schematic diagram of the whole process carried out in this study of KAG.
The SOx emission was minimized by incorporating with lime and seaweed at a ratio of 3.33:
1 and charged in the gasifier, the product gas yielded SOx emissions were minimized. The
slow pyrolysis of KAG was investigated in a stainless steel fixed bed reactor. The rate of
heating was kept at 20 K min-1
. A packed bed lime scrubber at the outlet assisted to minimize
the gaseous sulphur compounds release during experiment when the temperature raised upto
500°C. After some experiments, bio-oil yield was optimized at 500°C with holding time 4 h.
The average yield of bio-oil, bio-char/ash, and syn-gas obatained during pyrolysis were 28.6,
47.28, and 24.12 wt. % respectively. All characterization of bio-oil was done. The moisture
free bio-oil had a calorific value of 18.23 MJ kg-1
burnt with a flame. This obtained bio-oil
was upgraded to 41.10 MJ kg-1
by reduction. Finally, the energy balance on slow pyrolysis
process resulted in 21.8% efficiency as shown in Figure 3.
6.3 Harnessing energy from other seaweeds: Ulva fasciata, Gracilaria corticata,
Sargassum tenerrimum
Bio-oil = 0.0858
kg, EC = 1.56 MJ
Syn-gas = 0.1206
kg, EC = 0.32 MJ
Bio-char = 0.2364
kg, EC = 1.95 MJ
Pyrolysis Kappaphycus
alvarezii
Water wash
& Dry
Efficiency ɳ =
21.8%
Fresh Seaweed =
0.5 kg
Energy content
(EC) = 4.59 MJ
Energy input,
3.15 MJ
Gasification,
feed rate = 15
kg/h
Utilized
different kinetic
models
Profuse SOx
emission found in
syn-gas
Hence pyrolysis at suitable
temperature is the best
pathway for energy
Sap
extraction
14
Evidently, there are about 800 seaweed species of 29 orders belonging to different classes in
India [20 – 22]. The estimated global production seaweed was found around 7.5 to 8 million
tons and such wet seaweeds are being produced along the coastal regions worldwide every
year [23]. There are huge variations of production of seaweed in India due to the influence of
climate on the seaweed species. It was reported by earlier researchers that the estimated
productivity of seaweed was found to be more than 100000 ton wet weight consisting of 6000
ton agar yielding seaweeds, 16000 ton of algin yielding seaweed, 8000 ton of carrageenan
yielding seaweeds and the remaining 70000 ton of edible and green seaweed [24].
The main focus of this present study is the study of some macroalgae for energy application.
India (08.04–37.06 N and 68.07–97.25 E), a tropical South Asian country has a stretch of
about 7500 km coastline, excluding its island territories with 2 million square km Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ) and nine maritime states. The seaweed flora of India is highly
diversified and comprises mostly tropical species [25].
6.3.1 Brief description of the production of bio-oil through slow pyrolysis process with
Arrhenius kinetic model
Red seaweed Gracilaria corticata (GC), brown seaweed Sargassum tenirimum (ST) and
green seaweed Ulva fasciata (UF) were collected from Veraval (20.55°N and 70.20°E) west
coast of India. After cleaning the seaweed with water, sap was removed. It was found that the
extracted sap from these species comprised of several valuable macro nutrients such as K,
Na, Ca, and Mg which can be utilized various applications. The pyrolysis process was
described by the kinetic mechanism by Arrhenius approach. It was found that the three
seaweed species have comparatively low calorific value than terrestrial biomass due to the
presence of large amount of inorganic species. From the TGA curves, it was revealed that
there were three degradation temperature zones, (1) 150 – 260°C, 530 – 800°C and 800 –
900°C for UF, (2) 125 – 270°C, 270 – 350°C and 580 - 760°C for GC, (3) 180 – 330°C, 580
– 730°C and 750 – 950°C for ST for degradation. The weight loss pattern and kinetic
parameters were evaluated based on these temperature zones for respective seaweed species.
It was evident from the TGA curves that the best pyrolytic temperature was 500°C as most of
the volatiles were removed in this temperature. The product yield of these seaweeds was
evaluated and the obtained bio-oils were characterized for each species. The bio-oils
exhibited quite good calorific value in the range 27 to 34 MJ kg-1
and could be a substituted
15
for furnace oil. From FT-IR and GC-MS analyses, the functional groups were determined for
the bio-oils. The obtained bio-chars from slow pyrolysis were also characterized. The bio-
chars exhibited high fixed carbon and ash content. The ash compositions of the seaweeds
were determined. The major constituents in the ash were Na, K, Ca, and Mg. Ash fusion test
was also done. The whole process is described in Figure 4.
FIGURE 4: Schematic diagram of the whole process for three seaweed species.
7. Conclusions
The final conclusion of this PhD thesis is encapsulated here and the summary of each chapter
and subchapters are briefly described step by step. The current energy scenario for both world
and India is enumerated briefly so that the readers can understand the importance of
renewable energy sector. The literature survey about the different thermochemical conversion
processes such as gasification, pyrolysis associated with different kinetic models, and steam
gasification are elucidated and covered in the chapter two. The aim and the scope of the work
Seaweed
species
Ulva
fasciata
Gracilaria
corticata
Sargassum
tenerrimum
Characterization as a solid
fuel for the thermochemical
process
Pyrolysis at 500°C with
10°C min-1
heating rate
Kinetic
study by
Arrhenius
Bio-oil extracted
with ethyl acetate
and then
characterized
Bio-chars
characterized as a
fertilizer or solid
fuel
Syn-gas
characterized
SAP
extracted
16
are described in chapter three. Chapter four includes both wasteland derived biomass, and
marine macroalgae characterization as solid fuel. The complete characterization of the
selected biomass species predicts the suitable thermochemical routes and some of them are
experimentally validated and the rest predicted based on fuel characterization while
harnessing the renewable energy. The experimental case studies are described in chapter five.
Jatropha curcas shells were investigated in both gasification and pyrolysis process. The
second case study is about the gasification and pyrolysis of Kappaphycus alvarezii granules
for extracting energy. For the validation of pyrolysis process the different kinetic models are
undertaken for Kappaphycus alvarezii granules and comparison is done with sawdust. The
third case study is of harnessing energy from the three selected seaweed species named Ulva
fasciata, Gracilaria corticata, and Sargassum tenerrimum. The full characterization of the
seaweeds is done as a solid fuel. Kinetic model with Arrhenius approach is considered to
describe the kinetic parameters and from TGA curves suitable pyrolytic temperature is found
out. And finally, the chapter six contains conclusion and future scope of the work.
The biomass data bank especially from the angle of thermochemical conversion, available
today is deficient on the feed stock studied in this PhD thesis. A good contribution is
expected to reach the research fraternity in the aligned field through this work. In addition,
scale up of some of the processes described, through industrial forefront holds promise to
decrease India‘s import of fossil fuel.
17
8. List of Publication related to PhD thesis:
[1] Subarna Maiti, Pratap Bapat, Prasanta Das, Pushpito K. Ghosh. Feasibility study of
jatropha shell gasification for captive power generation in biodiesel production process from
whole dry fruits. Fuel 121 (2014) 126–132.
[2] Prasanta Das, Milan Dinda, Nehal Gosai, and Subarna Maiti. High Energy Density Bio-
oil via Slow Pyrolysis of Jatropha curcas Shells. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 4311−4320.
[3] Prasanta Das, Dibyendu Mondal, Subarna Maiti. Thermochemical conversion pathways
of Kappaphycus alvarezii granules through study of kinetic models. Bioresource Technology
234 (2017) 233–242.
[4] Prasanta Das, Samir Charola, Milan Dinda, Himanshu Patel, Subarna Maiti. Hydrogen
from empty cotton boll agro-waste via thermochemical route and feasibility study of
operating an IC engine in continuous mode. International journal of hydrogen energy 42
(2017) 14471 – 14484.
[5] Sumit Sahitya, Hasan Baig, Ruchita Jani, Nirav Gadhiya, Prasanta Das,Tapas K. Mallick,
and Subarna Maiti. Hydrogen rich syn-gas from Jatropha curcas shell biomass char in Fresnel
lens solar concentrator assembly. Energy and Fuel, DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01406.
9. List of Patent
[1] Process for potash recovery from biomethanated spent wash with concomitant
environmental remediation of effluent. Inventors: Pratyush Maiti, Subarna Maiti, Soumya
Halder, Krishna Kanta Ghara, Prasanta Das, S. K. Charola and Neha P. Patel. Patent filed in
CSIR, New Delhi, India. Pub. No. WO/2017/042832, International Application No.
PCT/IN2016/050298.
18
10. Reference:
[1] Onda K, Kasuga Y, Kato K, Fujiwara M, Tanimoto M (1997) Electric discharge removal
of SO2 and NOx from combustion flue gas by pulsed corona discharge. Energy Conversion
and Management 38, 1377–87.
[2] Gnanapragasam N, Reddy B, Rosen M. Reducing CO2 emissions for an IGCC power
generation system: effect of variations in gasifier and system operating conditions (2009)
Energy Conversion Management 50, 1915–23.
[3] Peng Y, Zhao B, Li L (2012) Advance in post-combustion CO2 capture with alkaline
solution: a brief review. Energy Procedia 14, 1515–22.
[4] Fine P, Hadas E (2012) Options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions during wastewater
treatment for agricultural use. Sci Total Environ 416, 289–99.
[5] Burcu Ertit Tastan, Ergin Duygu, Orhan Atakol , Gonul Donmez. SO2 and NO2 tolerance
of microalgae with the help of some growth stimulators (2012) Energy Conversion and
Management 64, 28–34.
[6] Radmann EM, Camerini FV, Santos TD, Costa JAV (2011) Isolation and application of
SOX and NOX resistant microalgae in biofixation of CO2 from thermoelectricity plants.
Energy Conversion and Management 52, 3132–6.
[7] Jacob-Lopes E, Scoparo CHG, Queiroz MI, Franco TT (2010) Biotransformations of
carbon dioxide in photobioreactors. Energy Conversion and Management 51, 894–900.
[8] Murray KE, Shields JA, Garcia ND, Healy FG. Productivity, carbon utilization, and
energy content of mass in scalable microalgae systems (2012) Bioresorce Technology 114,
499–506.
[9] Bilanovic D, Holland M, Armon R. Microalgal CO2 sequestering – modelling microalgae
production costs (2012) Energy Conversion and Management 2058, 104–9.
[10] V. Ramanathan and G. Carmichael, Global and regional climate changes due to black
carbon (2008) Nat. Geosci. 1, 221–227, doi:10.1038/ngeo156.
[11] S. Sahai, C. Sharma, D.P. Singh, C.K. Dixit, N. Singh, P. Sharma, K. Singh, S. Bhatt, S.
Ghude, V. Gupta, R.K. Gupta, M.K. Tiwari, S.C. Garg, A.P. Mitra, P.K. Gupta, A study for
development of emission factors for trace gases and carbonaceous particulate species from in
situ burning of wheat straw in agricultural fields in india (2007) Atmos. Environ. 41, 9173–
9186. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.054.
[12] A. Awasthi, R. Agarwal, S.K. Mittal, N. Singh, K. Singh, P.K. Gupta, Study of size and
mass distribution of particulate matter due to crop residue burning with seasonal variation in
19
rural area of Punjab, India (2011) J. Environ. Monit. 13, 1073–1081,
doi:10.1039/c1em10019j.
[13] Ghosh PK. et al. Process for the preparation of fatty acid methyl ester from triglyceride
oil by transesterification (2010), US Patent 7666234.
[14] Ghosh PK. et al. WO2011027353 (Filing date 22-09-2011, Publication date 29-03-2012)
– Integrated process for the production of jatropha methyl ester and by products.
[15] Azar, C., Lindgren, K., Andersson, B.A (2003). Global energy scenarios meeting
stringent CO2 constraints—cost-effective fuel choices in the transportation sector. Energy
Policy 31, 961–976.
[16] Bridgwater, A.V., Meier, D., Radlein, D (1999) An overview of fast pyrolysis of
biomass. Org. Geochem. 30, 1479–1493.
[17] Eswaran, K., Ghosh, P.K., Siddhanta, A.K., Periyasamy, P., Mehta, A.S., (2005) U.S.
Patent 6893479, May 17.
[18] Mondal, D., Sharma, M., Maiti, P., Prasad, K., Meena, R., Siddhanta, A.K., Bhatt, P.,
Ijardar, S., Mohandas, V.P., Ghosh, A., Eswaran, K., Shah, B.G., Ghosh, P.K.(2013). Process
for improved seaweed biomass conversion for fuel intermediates, agricultural nutrients and
fresh water. RSC Adv. 3, 17989–17997.
[19] Maiti, S., Bapat, P., Das, P., Ghosh, P (2014). Feasibility study of jatropha shell
gasification for captive power generation in biodiesel production process from whole dry
fruits. Fuel 121, 126–132.
[20] A.B. Ross, J.M. Jones, M.L. Kubacki, T. Bridgeman (2008) Classification of macroalgae
as fuel and its thermochemical behaviour. Bioresource Technology 99, 6494–6504.
[21] Abbott, I.A., (1982) Seaweeds and their uses. Aquatic Botany 12, 389–390.
[22] Oza RM, Zaidi SH (2001) A revised checklist of Indian marine algae. CSMCRI,
Bhavnagar, pp 24–29
[23] McHugh, D. J. (2003) A guide to the seaweed industry. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper,
441, p. 105.
[24] P. Kaladharan and N. Kaliaperumal. Seaweed Industry in India (Jan-Mar 1999) Central
Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi-682014, India.Quarterly (Vol. 22, No.1).
[25] P. V. Subba Rao and Vaibhav A. Mantri. Indian seaweed resources and sustainable
utilization: Scenario at the dawn of a new century. Review article. Marine Algae and Marine
Environment Division, Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute (CSIR),
Gijubhai Badheka Marg, Bhavnagar 364 002, India.