end-line assessment on knowledge, attitude, practices and … · 2019-07-09 · end-line assessment...
TRANSCRIPT
End-line assessment on
“Knowledge, attitude, practices and coverage of
maternal, newborn and child health care at selected townships
in Southern Chin State”
Myo Myo Mon1, Kyaw Min Htut1, Aung Ye Naung Win1,
Khin Zaw2, Myo Win Tin2, Nyi Nyi Zayar1, Phyo Aung Naing1
January 2018
Table of Contents
List of Tables .......................................................................................................................... 4
List of Figures ........................................................................................................................ 5
Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ 6
List of investigators ............................................................................................................... 7
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 8
1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 10
2. Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 11
3. Methodology ................................................................................................................... 11
3.1. Study design and study population .......................................................................... 11
3.2 Sample size and sampling ......................................................................................... 12
3.3 Data collection .......................................................................................................... 13
3.4 Data management and analysis ................................................................................ 13
3.5 Ethical consideration ................................................................................................. 13
3.6 Limitations of the study ............................................................................................ 13
4. Findings ........................................................................................................................... 14
4.1 Background characteristics of the participants ........................................................ 14
4.2 Antenatal care ........................................................................................................... 14
4.2.1 Knowledge of mothers on antenatal care ......................................................... 14
4.2.2 Attitude of mothers towards antenatal care ..................................................... 16
4.2.3 Antenatal care practice of mothers ................................................................... 16
4.3 Consequences of pregnancy ..................................................................................... 18
4.3.1 Knowledge on consequences of pregnancy....................................................... 18
4.4 Birth preparedness .................................................................................................... 19
4.4.1 Knowledge of mothers on birth preparedness .................................................. 19
4.4.2 Birth preparedness among mothers .................................................................. 20
4.5 Intra-partum care ...................................................................................................... 20
4.5.1 Knowledge of mothers on intra-partum care .................................................... 20
4.5.2 Attitude towards intra-partum care and delivery practice of mothers ............. 21
4.6 Newborn care ............................................................................................................ 22
4.6.1 Knowledge of mothers on newborn care .......................................................... 22
4.6.2 Newborn care practices of mothers .................................................................. 23
4.7 Postpartum care ........................................................................................................ 24
4.7.1 Knowledge and attitude of mothers on postpartum care ................................. 24
4.7.2 Postpartum care practice ................................................................................... 25
4.8 Contraception............................................................................................................ 25
4.8.1 Knowledge of mothers on contraception .......................................................... 25
4.8.2 Contraceptive practice ....................................................................................... 27
4.9 Child health care and coverage ................................................................................. 27
4.9.1 Immunization coverage...................................................................................... 27
4.9.2 Childhood illness and health care seeking behavior .......................................... 28
4.9.3 Environmental health ......................................................................................... 28
4.9.4 Awareness on sustainable community network ................................................ 29
4.10 Providers’ perspective towards MNCH project ...................................................... 31
4.10.1 Scope and coverage of the project .................................................................. 31
4.10.2 Achievements of the project ............................................................................ 31
4.10.3 Challenges during implementation of the project ........................................... 33
4.10.4 Suggestions from the participants ................................................................... 33
5. Discussion and recommendations .................................................................................. 33
6. References ....................................................................................................................... 36
Annex .................................................................................................................................. 37
Map of Kanpetlet Township ............................................................................................ 37
Map of Paletwa Township............................................................................................... 38
Photos from Field Data Collection .................................................................................. 39
List of Tables
Table 1 Background characteristics of the participants ...................................................... 14
Table 2 Knowledge of mothers on antenatal care .............................................................. 15
Table 3 Antenatal care services received by mothers ........................................................ 17
Table 4 Practice of mothers regarding food intake and activity during pregnancy ........... 18
Table 5 Knowledge of mothers on danger signs during pregnancy.................................... 19
Table 6 Knowledge of mothers on birth preparedness ...................................................... 19
Table 7 Information on birth preparedness among mothers ............................................. 20
Table 8 Knowledge of mothers on intra-partum care ........................................................ 20
Table 9 Attitude towards intra-partum care and delivery practice of mothers ................. 21
Table 10 Knowledge of mothers on essential newborn care and infant feeding ............... 23
Table 11 Knowledge and attitude of mothers on postpartum care ................................... 24
Table 12 Postpartum care services received by mothers ................................................... 25
Table 13 Knowledge of mothers on contraception ............................................................ 26
Table 14 Contraceptive practice of mothers ...................................................................... 27
Table 15 Immunization practice of children ....................................................................... 28
Table 16 Feeding habit practiced by mothers during child’s illness ................................... 28
Table 17 Hygienic practice of mothers ............................................................................... 28
Table 18 Awareness of mothers on community network .................................................. 29
List of Figures
Figure 1 Knowledge of mothers on minimum number of AN care needed ....................... 15
Figure 2 Comparison of mothers’ responses on reason for AN care .................................. 16
Figure 3 Proportion of mothers who have positive attitude towards AN care at end-line 16
Figure 4 Comparison of AN care services received by mothers at baseline and end-line . 17
Figure 5 Delivery practice of mothers at end-line .............................................................. 22
Figure 6 Knowledge of mothers on danger signs of newborn at end-line ......................... 22
Figure 7 Essential newborn care practices of mothers at end-line .................................... 23
Figure 8 Awareness of mothers on presence of referral system at their villages .............. 30
Figure 9 VHC activities attended by mothers from end-line assessment ........................... 30
Abbreviations
AMW Auxiliary Midwives
AN Antenatal
BHS Basic Health Staff
CHW Community Health Worker
IDI In-depth Interview
IRC International Rescue Committee
KII Key Informant Interview
MNCH Maternal, newborn and child health
NGO Non-governmental Organization
VHC Village Health Committee
List of investigators
Investigators
1. Dr. Myo Myo Mon Deputy Director/Head, Epidemiology Research Division,
DMR
2. Dr. Kyaw Min Htut Research Officer, Epidemiology Research Division, DMR
3. Dr. Aung Ye Naung Win Research Officer, Epidemiology Research Division, DMR
4. Dr. Nyi Nyi Zayar Research Officer, Epidemiology Research Division, DMR
5. Dr. Phyo Aung Naing Research Officer, Epidemiology Research Division, DMR
Collaborators
1. Dr. Myo Win Tin Senior Health Coordinator, IRC
2. Dr. Khin Zaw Senior Monitoring & Evaluation Manager, IRC
Data Collection and Data Entry Team
1. Daw Zin Mar Aye Epidemiology Research Division, DMR
2. Daw Lwin Lwin Ni Epidemiology Research Division, DMR
3. U Aung Soe Min Epidemiology Research Division, DMR
4. Daw Ni Ni Htay Aung Epidemiology Research Division, DMR
Executive Summary
To tackle the Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH) care needs of communities,
International Rescue Committee (IRC) has designed a maternal and child health program
in partnership with Township Health Department and local non-governmental
organization. Strengthening local capacities to improve maternal, newborn and child
health was launched in 2010 across 100 villages in Southern Chin State up to 2013 by EC
fund. Starting from 2014, with support of 3 MDG fund, it was expanded to the whole
Paletwa and Kanpetlet Townships of Southern Chin State. A community-based, cross-
sectional end-line assessment was carried out to determine knowledge, perception and
practice in MNCH care after community intervention in Paletwa Township and Kanpetlet
Township in 2017, and compare with that of the baseline assessment which was conducted
in 2015.
A total of 291 mothers of under two year old children participated in the assessment. In
general, knowledge and practice of mothers regarding MNCH were improved including
antenatal, delivery, postnatal and newborn care. Specifically, 74% of mothers from end-
line received their first AN care within 1st trimester which was considerably higher than
that of baseline (38%). Significantly higher proportions of mothers from end-line
assessment received postpartum care services including newborn care (14.1% and 74.2%),
medical check-up (22.9% and 47.8%), wound care (2.4% and 46.4%) and health education
(6.8% and 32%) in comparing to baseline. More children from the end-line (>80%) received
immunization relevant to their age. In particular, among children over 2 months old, 82.2%
and 81.4% of children had received BCG and DPT respectively. Of children over one year
of age, 82.8% had already got measles immunization.
As part of community intervention, village health committees were strengthened to help
mothers for emergency referral, nutrition promotion, emergency fund raising and health
education. Volunteers from the project villages actively participated in all these activities
especially for detecting danger signs and referring the mothers to nearest health center.
About 78% of participants were aware of the presence of volunteers for supporting
mothers in their respective villages. Nearly 66% of mothers have received health education
from the volunteers. Over 64% of mothers knew the presence of referral system at their
villages.
Accountability, Equity, Inclusion (AEI) practice cycles were also carried out to enhance the
communication between community, local implementing partners and Basic Health Staff
(BHS). These cycles could identify the challenges and find the solutions for improving
MNCH care. During discussions with health care providers, responsible township health
officers acknowledged that there were significant improvement in immunization coverage
and increased referral from the villages because of community intervention.
A number of challenges in different stages of the project implementation were also
highlighted. Limited human resource in public sector, presence of restricted areas,
communication difficulty hindering the preparation of activities and language barriers
were the major challenges as identified by the local implementing partners.
In summary, areas of major improvement included mothers’ AN care practice & AN
services received, knowledge of mothers on newborn care and vaccination. Moderate
improvements were seen for knowledge of mothers on AN care, mother’s hygienic practice
and activities of village health committee. On the other hand, contraceptive practice of
mother showed slight improvement.
Following recommendations were made based on the findings from the assessment.
- Practical and sustained ways should be identified and implemented for maintaining
achievement in immunization coverage after the project ends.
- Ways and means for the sustainability of the village health committees and
volunteers should be considered as to maintain the achievements in MNCH care
after the project ends.
- Strengthening of the linkage between BHS and VHC is also recommended.
1. Introduction
Under 3MDG’s (3 Millennium Development Goals) activities, maternal, newborn and child
health (MNCH) is the largest component covering maternal and newborn health, child
health, immunization, nutrition and health promotion. Since the establishment of fund in
2012, the focus of investment was to support township health planning and service
delivery aiming to scale-up and strengthen access to health services. A strategy applying a
continuum of care approach was used to deliver an essential package of MNCH services.
Working in partnership with State and Region Health Departments under the Ministry of
Health and Sports, 3MDG is supporting the work of basic health staff (BHS). Besides
support to facility-based healthcare services, the fund is also providing significant financing
for community-based work as well as service provision through the private sector. There
were evidences from economic modeling and early design work undertaken by the Fund
which demonstrated that support to all these aspects of the health sector is critical to
reach the targets. Therefore, in areas where this approach to MNCH is supported, the fund
provides financing support to the public sector, to international and local non-
governmental organizations (NGOs) and to health care providers who use a social
franchising approach.
To tackle the MCH care needs of communities, IRC has designed a maternal and child
health program in partnership with Township Health Department and local NGO. The
program has supported for the strengthening of community health care network and
maternal and child health care services through community participation. In selected
townships of Chin State (Kanpetlet and Paletwa), awareness raising sessions to sensitize
the community on the benefits of safeguarding dedicated resource for MNCH are carried
out for a couple of years. Community Health Workers (CHW) and Auxiliary Midwives
(AMW) are the responsible decision-makers for identifying the need for an emergency
referral, with the exception of villages where there is a health facility in which case
responsibility belongs to Basic Health Staff (BHS).
Strengthening local capacities to improve MNCH was launched in 2010 across 100 villages
in Southern Chin State up to 2013 by EC fund. Starting from 2014, with support of 3 MDG
fund, it was expanded to the whole townships of Paletwa and Kanpetlet in Southern Chin
State. Project interventions were supporting BHS for MNCH activities, training of CHWs,
AMWs and VHC for raising awareness of community and emergency referral. The project
trained CHWs, AMWs and VHCs to implement community health prevention and
behaviour change communication (BCC) activities in collaboration with BHS. More mothers
in targeted villages are able to identify warning signs of childhood diseases and as a result
seek more timely care for their children from trained health care providers (mainly CHW).
Women’s behaviour concerning pregnancy and child care is strongly influenced by cultural
and religious beliefs, which are inherently difficult to transform within a short period of
time and require longer durations of programming. Strong geographic, cultural and social
constraints, in addition to the scarcity of health care service providers in Paletwa,
illuminate the importance of developing a “close to client health care system” and
“community based health care network”.1
Previous community intervention studies have documented the successful application of
various strategies including BCC in promoting maternal, newborn and child health care.2-6
The BCC strategy have been used to implement advocacy, communication and social
mobilization activities in order to increase knowledge and utilization of health services for
improved maternal and child health outcomes of the target population. According to the
project design, MW and supportive staff have to conduct individual support supervision
visits to each village, focusing on improving service delivery of community case
management, rational use of drugs, early detection and timely referral of MCH cases,
health education, community mobilization for health promotion, reporting, recording, and
diseases surveillance. CHWs/AMWs are expected to participate in MW outreach and
health education actions as part of hands-on training but also to provide opportunities for
strengthening the working relationship and linkages between CHWs, AMWs, VHCs and
MWs, and health facilities. Additional cluster visits are also planned to carry out by
supportive staff and BHS. BHS and IRC programme staff carried out continuous support
activities for CHW/AMWs, which foster sustainable capacity and improve the quality of
services. With the aim of determining progress of the project in the communities by
comparing with the baseline assessment,7 end-line assessment was carried out during
September and December 2017.
2. Objectives
1. To determine the knowledge, perception, attitudes and practice in MNCH care
after community intervention in Paletwa Township and Kanpetlet Township, Chin
State
2. To compare the knowledge, perception, attitudes and practice in MNCH care after
community intervention with the baseline characteristics in Paletwa Township and
Kanpetlet Township, Chin State
3. Methodology
3.1. Study design and study population
A community-based, post intervention assessment on knowledge, attitudes and practices
in MNCH care among mothers of under 2 years old children was conducted applying a
mixed-methods design at Southern Chin State during September-December 2017.
Inclusion criteria
Mothers of under 2 years old children who are staying at least 2 years at the study
township
Exclusion criteria
Mothers of under 2 years old children who are moving into the study township after the
child birth
3.2 Sample size and sampling
Sample size for the end-line assessment is calculated using the following formula:
N = D [Z (2P (1-P))1/2 + Z (P1 (1- P1) + P2 (1-P2)) 1/2] 2 / (P2– P1)2
where
N = required sample size
D = design effect
Z = the z-score for alpha error, corresponding to the probability with which it is desired
to be able to conclude that an observed change of size (P2-P1) would not have occurred
by chance;
Z = the z-score for beta error, corresponding to the degree of confidence with which it
is desired to certain of detecting a change of size (P2– P1), if one actually occurred.
P1 = the estimated proportion of the study population who have knowledge about
danger signs during pregnancy at the baseline assessment
P2 = the proportion of the study population who would have knowledge about danger
signs during pregnancy at the endline assessment such that the quantity (P2– P1) is the size
of the magnitude of change it is desired to be able to detect;
P = (P1+ P2) / 2
The proportion of mothers who have knowledge about danger signs during pregnancy
before the interventions, that is P1, is 0.5 according to baseline information and that
proportion would be expected to go up to 0.75 at least after the completion of the
intervention (that is P2=0.75). So if we take alpha error as 5% and beta error as 20%, Z
would turn out to be 1.96 and Z 0.84. Design effect was taken as 2 since cluster sampling
was used.
N = 2 [1.96 (2 x 0.6 (1-0.6)) 1/2 + 0.84 (0.5 x (1- 0.5) + 0.7(1-0.7)) ½]2/ (0.7- 0.5) 2
= 132
Adding non-response rate 10%, then
150 (each township)
Therefore, total sample size = 150 + 150 = 300
Cluster sampling was applied to recruit the adequate sample size. At each township, seven
villages were randomly chosen considering to include from different geographical areas
and after excluding the no-go zones and conflict areas. At each selected village, a total of
20-25 eligible participants were recruited.
Purposive sampling was applied for qualitative data collection. In each township, in-depth
interviews and key informant interviews were conducted with responsible service
providers from public sector as well as from IRC. Focus group discussions were also done
with mothers and informal group discussions were carried out with volunteers.
3.3 Data collection
Same structured questionnaire from baseline assessment was used after adding the new
questions regarding intervention activities. FGD guides and KII guides were revised
accordingly to explore the strengths, weaknesses and lessons learned during the
intervention period. Participants were interviewed by trained research assistants by using
a structured questionnaire.
3.4 Data management and analysis
EpiData version 3.1 and SPSS version 20 were used for data entry and data analysis.
Descriptive information were shown as frequency for categorical variables and
mean/median for continuous variables. Comparison of main outcome measures was done
using Chi square test or t-test as appropriate. Thematic analysis was applied for qualitative
information. Triangulation of the research results was done from both quantitative and
qualitative information to capture the comprehensive understanding of the program.
3.5 Ethical consideration
Verbal informed consent was taken from all the participants after thorough explanation
about the assessment. Anonymity and confidentiality of the information were ensured
using the code numbers and only investigators have accessed to the information.
3.6 Limitations of the study
There were certain limitations which should be acknowledged. First of all, at the time of
data collection, the survey team could not get access to many villages from very hard to
reach and conflict areas and we could not know the situation of mothers from these areas.
Therefore, findings from current assessment reflect only to the areas which are free from
these constraints. Secondly, there was a limitation in communication at some areas due to
language barrier though we were using translators for interviewing the participants.
4. Findings
4.1 Background characteristics of the participants
A total of 291 respondents participated in the end-line assessment. Socio-demographic
characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. Age of the mothers ranged
from 17 to 49 years with the mean age of (29.3±6.1 years and 29.1±6.7 years). Mean
number of children under 5 years old was 1.5 ± 0.7. Background characteristics of the
participants were not different between baseline and end-line.
Table 1 Background characteristics of the participants
Characteristics Baseline (n=405)
n (%)
End-line (n=291)
n (%)
Paletwa
(n=205)
Kanpetlet
(n=200)
Paletwa
(n=151)
Kanpetlet
(n=140)
Age of respondent
Mean ± SD
Range
28.4 ± 5.8
17-49
29.7 ± 6.5
17-47
29.3 ± 6.1
18-45
29.1 ± 6.7
17-49
Age of respondent
15-24
25 and above
58 (28.3)
147 (71.7)
47 (23.5)
153 (76.5)
37 (24.5)
114 (75.5)
40 (28.6)
100 (71.4)
Age of children (month)
Mean ± SD
Range
13.0 ± 7.5
-
12.8 ± 7.3
-
11.7 ± 6.5
1-26
14.7 ± 8.2
1-30
4.2 Antenatal care
4.2.1 Knowledge of mothers on antenatal care
Minimum number of AN care needed was stated as at least four times by 67.3% of mothers
from end-line which was significantly higher than that of baseline (44.9%) (Figure 1). Table
2 describes the knowledge of mothers on antenatal care. Participants mentioned that
mean gestation age at first booking was 10.6 ± 5.6 months. Much higher proportion of
mothers from end-line stated the reason for receiving AN care as “to know the position of
fetus” than baseline (32% and 68%). Immunization was also mentioned as one of the
reasons by 48.1% and 15% of mothers respectively. Most common source of information
was health staff in both assessments (51% and 77%).
Figure 1 Knowledge of mothers on minimum number of AN care needed
Table 2 Knowledge of mothers on antenatal care
Characteristics Baseline
n (%)
End-line
n(%)
Paletwa(n=205) Paletwa (n=151) Kanpetlet (n=140)
Reasons for AN care#
To detect danger signs
To know fetal position
To receive regular check up
To get treatment
To get safe delivery service
To receive immunization
-
66 (32.0)
47 (23.0)
-
-
30 (15.0)
65 (43.0)
98 (64.9)
54 (35.8)
74 (49.0)
56 (37.1)
70 (46.4)
52 (37.1)
100 (71.4)
53 (37.9)
78 (55.7)
54 (38.6)
70 (50.0)
Source of AN information
Parents
Family members
Neighbors
Village informal health provider
Health staff
-
-
27 (13.0)
164 (20.0)
105 (51.0)
46 (30.5)
36 (23.8)
19 (12.6)
30 (19.9)
117 (77.5)
32 (22.9)
43 (30.7)
24 (17.2)
35 (25.0)
107 (76.4)
# Multiple responses
55.1%
32.6%
44.9%
67.3%
Base-Line (n= 405) End-line (n= 291)
1-3 times > 4 times
Figure 2 Comparison of mothers’ responses on reason for AN care
4.2.2 Attitude of mothers towards antenatal care
Figure (1) describes the attitude of mothers towards antenatal care. Majority of mothers
from the end-line assessment have positive attitude towards antenatal care. Specifically,
86.6% disagreed the statement “AN care is not always needed” and 93.5% disagreed the
statement “TT immunization is not important”. Moreover, 90.7% agreed that good
nutrition is needed during pregnancy.
Figure 3 Proportion of mothers who have positive attitude towards AN care at end-line
4.2.3 Antenatal care practice of mothers
Antenatal care practice of mothers is shown in Table (3). Mean gestational age at first AN
booking of mother from end-line was 11.9 ± 6.5 weeks which was earlier than that of
32%
23%15%
68%
36.8%
48.1%
Foetal position Regular check up Immunization
Base Line End Line
86.6%
34.4%
93.5%
90.7%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Necessity of AN care
Just for birth registration
For TT immunization
For good nutrition
Paletwa at baseline (14.0 ± 8.0). Mean number of AN care received by the mothers at end-
line was 4.4 times (± 1.9). Over 74% of mothers from end-line received their first AN care
within 1st trimester which was considerably higher than that of baseline at Kanpetlet (38%).
Almost all mothers (99.3%) from end-line assessment received at least one time of AN care.
Higher proportions of mothers from end-line (62.9% and 72.1%) received AN care for 4
times and above than baseline (44.9% and 37%).
In addition, more mothers from end-line got AN care services than baseline (Figure 3). In
particular, higher proportions of mothers received regular examination (31.5% and 87.6%),
iron + F/A tablets (49.7% and 89.7%), blood examination (2.5% and 37.8%) and TT
immunization (38.1% and 92.8%).
Table 3 Antenatal care services received by mothers
Characteristics Baseline (n=405)
n (%)
End-line (n=291)
n(%)
Paletwa
(n=205)
Kanpetlet
(n=200)
Paletwa
(n=151)
Kanpetlet
(n=140)
Number of AN care
<4 times
4 times & above
113 (55.1)
92 (44.9)
126 (63.0)
74 (37.0)
56 (37.1)
95 (62.9)
39 (27.9)
101 (72.1)
AN care provider#
TBA/TTBA
VHW
MW/LHV/HA/Nurse
Medical doctor
9 (4.5)
4 (2.0)
164 (80.0)
-
16 (8.0)
38 (19.1)
154 (77.0)
26 (7.8)
14 (9.3)
1 (0.7)
132 (87.4)
3 (2.0)
24 (17.1)
1 (0.7)
108 (77.1)
4 (2.9)
# Multiple responses
Figure 4 Comparison of AN care services received by mothers at baseline and end-line
31.5%
49.7%
2.5%
38.1%
87.6% 89.7%
37.8%
92.8%
Regular examination Iron + F/A tablets Blood examination(Malaria, HIV)
TT immunization
Base Line End Line
Table (4) describes the practice of mothers regarding food intake and activity during
pregnancy. Mother who avoided some food during pregnancy was reduced at end-line
assessment (30% vs. 19.2% & 20.7%). Proportion of mothers who had increased activity
was also lessened at the end-line (30% vs. 0.7% & 5.0%).
Table 4 Practice of mothers regarding food intake and activity during pregnancy
Characteristics Baseline, n (%) End-line, n(%)
Paletwa
(n=205)
Paletwa
(n=151)
Kanpetlet
(n=140)
Avoidance of food during
pregnancy
Yes
No
62 (30.0)
143 (70.0)
29 (19.2)
122 (80.8)
29 (20.7)
111 (79.3)
Amount of meal during
pregnancy
No change
Increase amount
Reduce amount
107 (52.0)
51 (25.0)
47 (23.0)
68 (45.0)
65 (43.0)
18 (11.9)
89 (63.6)
33 (23.6)
18 (12.9)
Regular activity during
pregnancy
No change
Increase activity
Reduce activity
55 (27.0)
62 (30.0)
88 (43.0)
93 (61.6)
1 (0.7)
57 (37.7)
82 (58.6)
7 (5.0)
51 (36.4)
4.3 Consequences of pregnancy
4.3.1 Knowledge on consequences of pregnancy
Knowledge of mothers on danger signs during pregnancy was shown in Table (5). Common
dangers signs mentioned by the mothers from end-line were vaginal bleeding (73.5% and
75.7%), high BP (71.5% and 61.4%), headache/dizziness (55.0% and 70.7%) and edema
(53.0% and 66.4%). Almost all mothers (94.9%) from end-line knew at least one danger
sign during pregnancy. Moreover, 86.6% of mothers could mention at least two danger
signs which was much higher than that of baseline at Kanpetlet (47.5%). About 30%
(87/291) of mothers from end-line had experience of danger sign during pregnancy. More
mothers from end-line sought health care for danger signs from basic health staff than
baseline (64.2% vs. 48.0%) (Not shown in the table).
Table 5 Knowledge of mothers on danger signs during pregnancy
Characteristics Baseline, n (%) End-line, n(%)
Paletwa
(n=205)
Paletwa
(n=151)
Kanpetlet
(n=140)
Danger sign during pregnancy#
Edema
High BP
Headache/Dizziness
Reduce fetal movement
Vaginal bleeding
Foul smelling discharge
Fever
Blurred vision
Dyspnoea
Severe vomiting
-
-
47 (23.0)
-
-
-
55 (27.0)
-
-
57 (28.0)
80 (53.0)
108 (71.5)
83 (55.0)
40 (26.5)
111 (73.5)
62 (41.1)
52 (34.4)
34 (22.5)
34 (22.5)
25 (16.6)
93 (66.4)
86 (61.4)
99 (70.7)
46 (32.9)
106 (75.7)
54 (38.6)
51 (36.4)
44 (31.4)
41 (29.3)
39 (27.9)
# Multiple responses
4.4 Birth preparedness
4.4.1 Knowledge of mothers on birth preparedness
Knowledge of mothers on birth preparedness is shown in Table (6). More mothers from
end-line could mention “availability of clean delivery kits” (36.0% vs. 76.8% and 76.4%) and
“preparation of clean clothes” (30.0% vs. 83.4% and 89.3%) than baseline assessment at
Paletwa.
Table 6 Knowledge of mothers on birth preparedness
Characteristics Baseline, n (%) End-line, n(%)
Paletwa
(n=205)
Paletwa
(n=151)
Kanpetlet
(n=140)
Identification of skill birth attendant
Preparation of expenses
Arrange for transport
Availability of clean delivery kit
Preparation of clean clothes
201 (98.5)
164 (80.0)
158 (77.0)
74 (36.0)
62 (30.0)
147 (97.4)
127 (84.1)
110 (72.8)
116 (76.8)
126 (83.4)
119 (85.0)
99 (70.7)
98 (70.0)
107 (76.4)
125 (89.3)
# Multiple responses
4.4.2 Birth preparedness among mothers
Table (7) shows the information on birth preparedness among mothers. At end-line assessment, 75.5% of mothers from Paletwa stated that they planned to give birth with Basic Health Staff which was higher than baseline (40%).
Table 7 Information on birth preparedness among mothers
Characteristics Baseline, n (%)
Paletwa
(n=205)
End-line, n(%)
Paletwa
(n=151)
Kanpetlet
(n=140)
Planned birth attendant
TBA
TTBA/AMW
MW/LHV/HA/Nurse
Medical doctor
Obs&Gy
25 (12.0)
80 (39.0)
82 (40.0)
8 (4.0)
-
2 (1.3)
18 (11.9)
114 (75.5)
15 (9.9)
-
30 (21.4)
15 (10.7)
64 (45.7)
26 (18.6)
1 (0.7)
4.5 Intra-partum care
4.5.1 Knowledge of mothers on intra-partum care
As shown in Table (8), much higher proportion of participants at the end-line assessment could mention intra-partum danger signs than at baseline assessment. Common danger signs they stated were heavy vaginal bleeding (62.8% and 75.0%), unconsciousness (58.1% and 52.9%), high blood pressure (31.8% and 39.0%), prolonged labour (33.1% and 36.8%) and edema (27.0% and 40.4%). Over 87.8% and 79.0% of mothers from end-line identified MW/LHV/ HA/Nurse as skilled birth attendant.
Table 8 Knowledge of mothers on intra-partum care
Characteristics Baseline, n (%)
Paletwa
(n=205)
End-line, n(%)
Paletwa
(n=151)
Kanpetlet
(n=140)
Danger sign during delivery#
Edema
Heavy vaginal bleeding
Unconsciousness
Eclampsia
High BP
Dyspnoea
No fetal movement
Prolonged labour
-
55 (27.0)
-
-
-
-
47 (23.0)
129 (63.0)
40 (27.0)
93 (62.8)
86 (58.1)
31 (20.9)
47 (31.8)
39 (26.4)
44 (29.7)
49 (33.1)
55 (40.4)
102 (75.0)
72 (52.9)
48 (35.3)
53 (39.0)
41 (30.1)
38 (27.9)
50 (36.8)
Skilled birth attendant
TBA
21 (10.0)
36 (24.3)
48 (34.8)
TTBA/AMW
MW/LHV/HA/Nurse
Medical doctor
Obs&Gy
90 (44.0)
-
-
-
31 (20.9)
130 (87.8)
75 (50.7)
8 (5.4)
25 (18.1)
109 (79.0)
43 (31.2)
15 (10.9)
# Multiple responses
4.5.2 Attitude towards intra-partum care and delivery practice of mothers
As shown in Table (9), lesser proportion of mothers from end-line responded that delivery
at home is better than at hospital (44% vs. 33.1% and 25.7%). Over 85% of mothers
experienced vaginal delivery. Transportation difficulty (20%) and financial constraint (17%)
were mentioned as reasons for not going to skilled birth attendant (SBA) at baseline.
Similarly, commonest reasons at end-line were “no SBA at village (16.2%)”, “financial
constraint (9%)” and “transportation difficulty (8.3%)”.
Table 9 Attitude towards intra-partum care and delivery practice of mothers
Characteristics Baseline, n (%)
Paletwa
(n=205)
End-line, n(%)
Paletwa
(n=151)
Kanpetlet
(n=140)
Delivery at home is better than
at hospital
90 (44.0)
50 (33.1)
36 (25.7)
Seeking care for delivery
consequences
TBA
Family members
TTBA/AMW
MW/LHV/HA/Nurse
Medical doctor
-
-
84 (41.0)
-
-
(n=15)
2 (13.3)
1 (6.6)
3 (20.0)
8 (53.3)
7 (46.6)
(n=38)
14 (36.1)
13 (34.2)
2 (5.2)
23 (60.5)
13 (34.2)
Figure 5 Delivery practice of mothers at end-line
4.6 Newborn care
4.6.1 Knowledge of mothers on newborn care
Knowledge of mothers on danger signs of newborn care at end-line is illustrated in Figure
(5). Commonest danger sign mentioned by the respondents was dyspnea (71.8%) which
was followed by fever (61.5%) and blue pale colour (60.5%).
Figure 6 Knowledge of mothers on danger signs of newborn at end-line
Table (10) shows the knowledge of mothers on essential newborn care and infant feeding.
Considerably higher proportions of mothers from end-line stated that thermal care (71.7%
85.6%
2.1% 12.4%
Vaginal delivery Instrumental delivery LSCS
71.8%
61.5% 60.5%56.7%
51.2%
39.9%
Dyspnoea Fever Blue palecolour
No cry Nomovement
Hypothermia
vs. 89.4% and 97.1%), cord care (38.5% vs. 80.1% and 83.6%) and breast feeding (25% vs.
94.0% and 97.9%) were the essential components of newborn care.
Table 10 Knowledge of mothers on essential newborn care and infant feeding
Characteristics Baseline, n (%)
Paletwa
(n=205)
End-line, n(%)
Paletwa
(n=151)
Kanpetlet
(n=140)
Essential newborn care#
Thermal care
Cord care
Breast feeding
146 (71.7)
79 (38.5)
51 (25.0)
135 (89.4)
121 (80.1)
142 (94.0)
136 (97.1)
117 (83.6)
137 (97.9)
Infant feeding (0-6 months)#
Breast milk
Warm water
Cow milk
Cereal
Honey & sugar
200 (98.0)
162 (79.0)
121 (59.0)
115 (56.0)
62 (30.0)
149 (98.7)
25 (16.6)
7 (4.6)
2 (1.3)
18 (11.9)
138 (98.6)
20 (14.3)
5 (3.6)
2 (1.4)
14 (10.0)
# Multiple responses
4.6.2 Newborn care practices of mothers
Figure (6) illustrated the essential newborn care practices of mothers at end-line. Almost
all mothers practiced thermal care (99.3%) and cord care (95.9%). Moreover, 57% of
mothers initiated breast feeding within an hour.
Figure 7 Essential newborn care practices of mothers at end-line
99.3% 95.9%
57.0%
Thermal care Cord care Breast feeding within an hour
4.7 Postpartum care
4.7.1 Knowledge and attitude of mothers on postpartum care
Table (11) describes the knowledge and attitude of mothers on postpartum care.
Knowledge of mothers on postpartum danger signs was not significantly different between
baseline and end-line. Mothers had different opinion on the duration of puerperium. Mean
durations of puerperium (days) as mentioned by the mothers were 14 ± 18 days in baseline
and 20.7 days in end-line assessment. More mothers (68.9% and 69.3%) from end-line
desired to choose Basic Health Staff as a post-partum care provider than baseline (53.7%).
Considerably higher proportion of respondents from end-line (55.0% and 44.3%) than
baseline (2.5%) mentioned “wound care” as one of the PN care services. Majority of
mothers (80.1% and 73.6%) from end-line mentioned that newborn care is needed during
postnatal period, however lesser proportion of mothers (10.8%) from baseline described
about it.
Table 11 Knowledge and attitude of mothers on postpartum care
Characteristics Baseline
n(%)
Paletwa (205)
End-line
n(%)
Paletwa (n=151) Kanpetlet (n=140)
Postpartum danger sign#
Heavy bleeding
Oedema
Fever
Foul smelly discharge
Lower abdominal pain
172 (83.9)
157 (76.6)
186 (90.6)
157 (76.6)
186 (90.6)
136 (90.1)
111 (73.5)
125 (82.8)
117 (77.5)
118 (78.1)
132 (94.3)
115 (82.1)
129 (92.1)
117 (83.6)
112 (80.0)
Duration of puerperium (ds)
Mean ± SD
Median
Range
14 ± 18
-
2 - 90
20.7 ± 24.0
8.0
2-90
20.7 ± 18.9
10.0
3-90
PN provider
Family member
BHS
Medical doctor
TBA/VHW
92 (44.9)
134 (53.7)
-
13 (5.0)
56 (37.1)
104 (68.9)
5 (3.3)
18 (11.9)
43 (30.7)
97 (69.3)
1 (0.7)
22 (15.7)
PN care#
Breast care
Immunization
Medical check-up
Wound care
Health education
17 (8.3)
87 (42.2)
47 (23.0)
5 (2.5)
7 (3.4)
51 (33.8)
63 (41.7)
73 (48.3)
83 (55.0)
48 (31.8)
43 (30.7)
50 (35.7)
66 (47.1)
62 (44.3)
50 (35.7)
Newborn care
Contraception
22 (10.8)
2 (1.0)
121 (80.1)
27 (17.9)
103 (73.6)
30 (21.4)
# Multiple responses
4.7.2 Postpartum care practice
Postpartum care services received by mothers are described in Table (12). Significantly
higher proportions of mothers from end-line assessment received postpartum care
services including newborn care (14.1% vs 76.2% and 72.1%), medical check-up (22.9% vs.
45.7% and 50.0%), wound care (2.4% vs. 49.7% and 42.9%) and health education (6.8% vs.
26.5% and 37.9%).
Table 12 Postpartum care services received by mothers
Characteristics Baseline, n (%)
Paletwa
(n=205)
End-line, n(%)
Paletwa
(n=151)
Kanpetlet
(n=140)
PN care#
Breast care
Immunization
Medical check-up
Wound care
Health education
Newborn care
Contraception
19 (9.3)
92 (44.9)
47 (22.9)
5 (2.4)
14 (6.8)
29 (14.1)
2 (1.0)
48 (31.8)
61 (40.4)
69 (45.7)
75 (49.7)
40 (26.5)
115 (76.2)
23 (15.2)
41 (29.3)
58 (41.4)
70 (50.0)
60 (42.9)
53 (37.9)
101 (72.1)
28 (20.0)
# Multiple responses
4.8 Contraception
4.8.1 Knowledge of mothers on contraception
Table 13 describes the knowledge of mothers on contraception. Injection and oral
contraceptive pills were the two most common contraception method identified by the
participants from both baseline and end-line assessments. In particular, 75.6% of mothers
from base-line assessment had knowledge about oral contraceptive pills while over 92.1%
of mothers from end-line assessment could mention it. Similarly, majority of them
recognized the injection method for contraception (84.2% and 95.5%). About 58% of
mothers from end-line assessment and 43% from baseline assessment considered that
injection method is suitable for them. Most of them received information about
contraception from health staff (59.3% and 85.2%) followed by family members/friends
(13.3% and 36.8%). Around half of them received family planning services from health
center at both baseline and end-line assessments (48.6% and 52.9%). Considerably higher
proportion of mothers from end-line received the service from volunteer health workers
(7.7% and 51.9%) than baseline.
Table 13 Knowledge of mothers on contraception
Characteristics Baseline (n=405)
n (%)
End-line (n=291)
n(%)
Contraceptive methods#
OCP
Injection
IUCD
Implant
Female sterilization
Male condom
EOC
Male sterilization
Traditional Method
306 (75.6)
341 (84.2)
156 (38.5)
144 (35.6)
29 (7.2)
60 (14.8)
3 (0.7)
5 (1.2)
17 (4.2)
268 (92.1)
278 (95.5)
135 (46.4)
162 (55.7)
47 (16.2)
55 (19.8)
2 (0.7)
-
-
Preferred contraceptive methods#
OCP
Injection
IUCD
Implant
Female sterilization
Male condom
Male sterilization
Don’t want to use
54 (13.3)
174 (43.0)
24 (5.9)
55 (13.6)
23 (5.7)
12 (3.0)
1 (0.2)
22 (5.4)
42 (22.3)
109 (58.0)
8 (4.3)
18 (9.6)
9 (4.8)
3 (1.6)
-
-
Source of information#
Family members/ Friends
Radio/TV/Newspaper/Journal
VHW
Health staff
54 (13.3)
6 (1.5)
7 (1.7)
240 (59.3)
107 (36.8)
20 (6.9)
11 (3.8)
248 (85.2)
Family planning service
Health center
VHW
Private clinic
Hospital
NGO
197 (48.6)
31 (7.7)
22 (5.4)
97 (24.0)
23 (5.7)
154 (52.9)
151 (51.9)
24 (8.2)
64 (22.0)
15 (5.2)
# Multiple responses
4.8.2 Contraceptive practice
Table 14 describes the contraceptive practice of mothers. Just over 43% of mothers from
baseline assessment and 55.3% from end-line assessment are using contraception. Mean
duration of initiating contraception after delivery was 186 days at baseline and 134 days
at end-line. Most common reason for not using contraception was “unwillingness” (52.2%
and 84.7%). Nearly 59% of mothers used injection method for contraception and about
24% of them used oral contraception pills at end-line assessment.
Table 14 Contraceptive practice of mothers
Characteristics Baseline (n=405)
n (%)
End-line (n=291)
n(%)
Contraceptive use
Yes
No
175 (43.2)
230 (56.8)
161 (55.3)
130 (44.7)
Contraceptive methods
OCP
Injection
IUCD
Implant
Female sterilization
(n=175)
29 (16.6)
78 (44.6)
4 (2.3)
18 (10.3)
2 (1.1)
(n=161)
38 (23.6)
94 (58.4)
5 (3.1)
13 (8.1)
11 (6.8)
Reason for not using contraception
Could not afford
Don’t know method
Don’t know the source
Cultural norm/tradition
Unwillingness
(n=230)
12 (5.2)
58 (25.2)
-
4 (1.7)
120 (52.2)
(n=130)
1 (0.8)
7 (5.3)
3 (2.3)
5 (3.8)
111 (84.7)
4.9 Child health care and coverage
4.9.1 Immunization coverage
Immunization coverage among children at end-line assessment is described in Table (15).
Among children over 2 months old, 82.2% and 81.4% of children had received BCG and DPT
respectively. Of children over one year of age, 82.8% had already got measles
immunization.
Table 15 Immunization practice of children
Characteristics Number of eligible
children
Immunization received
n(%)
BCG (>2 months old children)
DPT
>2 months old children
>6 months old children
Measles
>9 months old children
>12 months old children)
>18 months old children)
269
269
224
186
134
77
221/269 (82.2)
219/269 (81.4)
188/224 (83.9)
134/186 (72.0)
111/134 (82.8)
64/77 (83.1)
4.9.2 Childhood illness and health care seeking behavior
During one year, 58.4% (170/291) children got at least one episode of diarrhea. Among
them, 90.6% (154/170) of children had taken ORS, 14.7% (25/170) had antibiotics and 2.9%
(5/170) had zinc tablets. Nearly 76% (221/291) of children had experienced at least one
symptom of respiratory tract infection. For any kind of illness, 52.9% of mothers chose
Basic Health Staff for seeking health care for their children. More than 63% of the mothers
from end-line and 50.8% from baseline stated that they fed their children as usual or
increase amount during illness.
Table 16 Feeding habit practiced by mothers during child’s illness
Characteristics Baseline (n=405)
n (%)
End-line (n=291)
n (%)
Amount of food during illness
As usual/increase amount
Reduce amount
Avoid some food
Prepare digestible food
205 (50.8)
175 (43.3)
15 (3.8)
4 (1.0)
185 (63.5)
33 (11.3)
25 (8.6)
32 (11.0)
4.9.3 Environmental health
As shown in Table (17), improvement in hand washing practice of mothers was seen at
end-line. More than 80%, 88.7% and 84.9% of mothers washed their hands after having
meal, before meal and after using toilet respectively. In addition, family members who
used fly proof latrine were also increased at end-line.
Table 17 Hygienic practice of mothers
Characteristics Baseline (n=405)
n (%)
End-line (n=291)
n(%)
Hand washing practice
After having meal
Before meal
After using toilet
212 (52.5)
212 (52.5)
212 (52.5)
234 (80.4)
258 (88.7)
247 (84.9)
Use of fly proof latrine
Yes
No
284 (70.0)
121 (30.0)
239 (82.1)
52 (17.9)
4.9.4 Awareness on sustainable community network
As shown in Table (18), at end-line assessment, 77.7% of mothers were aware of the
presence of village health committee and 65.6% had received health education from VHC.
However, only 47% knew that funding support was provided to mothers who were
referred to the hospital. According to Figure (7), 64% of mothers knew the presence of
referral system at their villages. Figure (8) shows the VHC activities attended by mothers
from end-line assessment. Commonest activity they had attended was health education
(64.9%) which was followed by VHC meeting (30.6%) and cooking demonstration (27.5%).
Table 18 Awareness of mothers on community network
Characteristics Baseline (n=405)
n (%)
End-line (n=291)
n(%)
Presence of MSG/VHC
Yes
No/Don’t know
245 (60.5)
160 (39.5)
226 (77.7)
65 (22.4)
Receive HE from MSG/VHC
Yes
No
284 (70.0)
121 (30.0)
191 (65.6)
100 (34.4)
Funding support for referral
Yes
No/Don’t know
175 (43.2)
230 (56.8)
137 (47.1)
154 (52.9)
Figure 8 Awareness of mothers on presence of referral system at their villages
Figure 9 VHC activities attended by mothers from end-line assessment
186, 64%29, 10%
76, 26%
Yes
No
Don't know
64.9%
30.6%27.5%
14.1%
Health education VHC meeting Cookingdemonstration
Referalinformation
4.10 Providers’ perspective towards MNCH project
4.10.1 Scope and coverage of the project
Project activities were carried out in all villages of Kanpetlet and Paletwa townships.
However, there were some villages that cannot be accessed during raining season.
Moreover, some villages were situated in “no go zone” or “conflict area”.
- Support the meetings
o Monthly RHC meeting
o Quarterly sub-center meeting (attended by volunteers)
o 4 monthly RHC meeting (attended by VHC)
- Trainings
o Support AMW and CHW training
o Accountability Equity Inclusion (AEI) awareness multiplier training
o Fund management training to VHC
- Outreach and supervision support
o Support for EPI and outreach activities
o Support for township supervision on child and maternal death
o Support for RHC to sub-center supervision
- AEI practice cycle
- MCH mobile clinic tour
- Nutrition promotion: cooking demonstration
- Environmental sanitation in coordination with Township Administrative Department
4.10.2 Achievements of the project
Focal persons from public sector acknowledged the achievement of MNCH project
especially on the success of EPI coverage and referrals from the villages. With the support
of IRC, midwives from each RHC could attend monthly meeting at Township Hospital.
Therefore, MWs could carry back the immunization boxes which could able to enhance the
immunization programs at the villages. Revitalization of the village health committees
(VHC) was another major achievement of the program. VHC members actively participated
in the MNCH care as well as environmental sanitation. Promotion of community
participation is also achieved through VHC activities. Another important achievement was
establishment of “emergency fund” at each village run by VHC.
“IRC give travel support to all midwives, so they could attend the monthly meeting at Township
Hospital. Then, they could carry back the immunization boxes. It helps to improve EPI coverage. In
the past, EPI coverage is about 70%. Now, it becomes 90%. This is the main success of the
program…”
“IRC က ဆရာမေတြ လကနအစညးအေဝးတကဖ႔ ခရးစရတေပးေတာ သတ႔ေတြ လတငးလာနငတယေလ…
အျပနကရင ကာကြယေဆးပးေတြ သယသြားနငေတာ EPI coverage တကလာတယ… အရငက ၇၀% ေလာက
ကေန ခဆ ၉၀% ေကာလာတယ … အဒါေတြ အဓက ေအာငျမငတာ …” (Focal person, public sector)
“In the past, EPI was carried out in only 19 villages. After initiation of the MNCH project, we could
cover the whole township for EPI…”
“အရငက EPI က ၁၉-ရြာဘ ထးႏငတယ … MNCH project ဝငၿပးမ တၿမ႕နယလး cover ျဖစလာတာ…”
(Focal person, local NGO, Kanpetlet)
AEI practice cycles were conducted in the villages and trying to find the ways for improving the
communication between the community and BHS. Step-by-step process enabled
“…AEI practice cycle is useful … and also successful. We like the process as it could help in
negotiating the gaps between community and BHS …”
“… AEI practice cycle လပေပးတာ အကးရတယ ေအာငျမငတယလ႔လညး ေျပာလ႔ရတယ … community န႔
BHS ၾကားက ကြာဟတာေတြ လအပခကေတြ ရေနတာက ညႏႈငးေပးႏငေတာ ႀကကပါတယ …”
(Focal person, local NGO, Paletwa)
“… Community participation is improved. In the past, villagers were not willing to help the midwives
for carrying immunization box. Now, it’s good that volunteers are helping the MWs for EPI …”
“… Community participation ေကာငးလာတယ .. အရငကဆ ရြာကလေတြက ဆရာမက ေဆးပးေတာင
သယမေပးၾကဘး … ခေနာကပငးေတာ volunteer ေတြက EPI အတြက ကေပးၾကေတာ အဆငေျပတယ …”
(Focal persons, local NGO, both townships)
“Establishment of ‘emergency fund’ led by VHC is successful. In some villages, they have about 10
lakhs …”
“VHC က ဥးေဆာငၿပး emergency fund စခငးတာ ေအာငျမငတယလ႔ ေျပာရမယ… တခ႕ရြာေတြမာ ၁၀-သနး
ေလာကရေနၿပ …” (Focal person, local NGO, Paletwa)
4.10.3 Challenges during implementation of the project
Service providers also highlighted the challenges and difficulties they have faced during
different stages of the project implementation. One of the main barriers while doing
implementation activities was presence of restricted areas or villages in some project sites.
Other challenges they mentioned were:
- Limited human resource in public sector
- Lack of trained focal person
- Language barrier in most rural areas
- Difficulty in communication which hinder the preparation of activities
- Absence of communication channel like telephone to monitor village health
volunteers
- No or very few referrals from remote villages
- Very sparse situation of villages
- Weakness in volunteer reporting system
- Attrition of volunteers in some villages
4.10.4 Suggestions from the participants
A number of suggestions were given by the focal persons from public sector, local NGO
and VHC members.
- To establish Township Health Committee Fund
- To strengthen the linkage between VHC and BHS
- To monitor for the sustainability of emergency fund
- To enhance motivation of BHS for improved ownership of the projec
5. Discussion and recommendations
IRC has designed a maternal and child health program in partnership with Township Health
Department and local non-governmental organization (LNGO). Intervention activities were
implemented in these townships to promote MNCH care and environmental sanitation
with the aim of reducing maternal and child morbidity and mortality since 2014. Baseline
assessment was done in 2015 and an end-line assessment was carried out in Kanpetlet and
Paletwa townships, Southern Chin State at the end of 2017. A total of 291 mothers
participated in the end-line assessment and background characteristics were not different
with that of the baseline.
Main intervention approaches were the strengthening of community health care network
through community participation and supporting BHS in provision of MNCH care services
with the help of local NGO. Geographic situation in most areas of these townships was very
hard to reach and community was facing difficulty in accessing health care services.
Therefore, a strategy of using voluntary health workers was very useful for those areas
where BHS could not get access. Applying AEI practice cycle could also identify the gaps in
MNCH care after discussions have been made between local NGO, BHS and VHC thereby
aiming for improving MNCH care. Step-by-step approach of AEI could able to recognize
challenges, search for the solutions and make final decision after discussion with focal
person from public sector. Such kind of approach seems very useful since all concerned
people included in the process which could enhance the community participation and
ownership.
Different intervention strategies have been documented in previous studies showing
improvements in MNCH care as well as challenges faced by the implementers.2-6,8 In
Vietnam, assessment on MCH handbook intervention was done and challenges were
identified. Although MCH outcomes were improved, weakness in recording handbook by
mothers as well as provider was seen as a challenge.3 In Kenya, assessment was done to
see the MNCH outcomes after using monitoring and tracking tool for community health
volunteers. After using the tool, volunteers could able to plan their activities and
workloads, identify requirements of beneficiaries for MNCH care. Voluntary health
workers acknowledged the usefulness of the tool and MNCH outcomes were also
improved.8
One of the successful outcomes in current study was improvement in knowledge as well
as practice of mothers regarding MNCH. Specifically, knowledge of mothers on AN care,
danger signs during pregnancy, delivery and postpartum were improved at end-line. More
mothers from end-line received AN, delivery and PN care services than baseline. In
addition, more mothers from end-line practiced essential newborn care than that of
baseline.
Another major achievement of the current MNCH project was increased immunization
coverage in both townships. Supporting midwives to attend the monthly meeting could
enable them to carry back the immunization boxes thereby increasing the immunization
coverage at remote areas where routine immunization was impossible. All the focal
persons from public sector and local NGO acknowledged the success of immunization
coverage after initiation of the project.
Successful MNCH outcomes were achieved along with the improvement in community
participation. It was also linked with the revitalization of village health committees (VHC)
and establishment of “emergency fund” at the villages. As part of community intervention,
village health committees were strengthened to help mothers for emergency referral,
nutrition promotion, emergency fund raising and health education. However,
sustainability of these VHCs and their activities after the project remained as a challenge.
Besides achievements, there were challenges in different stages of the project
implementation. Limited human resource in public sector, presence of restricted areas,
communication difficulty hindering the preparation of activities and language barriers
were the major challenges as identified by the local implementing partners.
Following recommendations were made based on the findings from the assessment.
- Practical and sustained ways should be identified and implemented for maintaining
achievement in immunization coverage after the project ends.
- Ways and means for the sustainability of the village health committees and
volunteers should be considered as to maintain the achievements in MNCH care
after the project ends.
- Strengthening of the linkage between BHS and VHC is also recommended.
6. References
1. Knowledge, Practice and Coverage (KPC) Survey for Maternal and Child Health
Paletwa Township, Southern Chin State, Union of Myanmar. End of Project Survey
Report. October 2012
2. Horii N, Habi O, Dangana A, Maina A, Alzouma S, Charbit Y. Community-based
behavior change promoting child health care: a response to socio-economic
disparity. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition. 2016;35:12.
doi:10.1186/s41043-016-0048-y.
3. Aiga H, Nguyen VD, Nguyen CD, Nguyen TTT, Nguyen LTP. Knowledge, attitude and
practices: assessing maternal and child health care handbook intervention in
Vietnam. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:129. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-2788-4.
4. Department of Medical Research and Burnet Institute. Baseline and endline report
on “Male participation in maternal and newborn health: community-based
intervention”. 2014.
5. Cofie LE, Barrington C, Akaligaung A, et al. Integrating community outreach into a
quality improvement project to promote maternal and child health in Ghana.
Global public health. 2014;9(10):1184-1197. doi:10.1080/17441692.2014.952656.
6. Perry H, Morrow M, Borger S, et al. Care Groups I: An Innovative Community-Based
Strategy for Improving Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health in Resource-
Constrained Settings. Global Health: Science and Practice. 2015;3(3):358-369.
doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00051.
7. Kyaw Oo, Thida, Yadana Aung, Kyaw Thu Soe, Nyein Nyein Thaung. Department of
Medical Research (Pyin Oo Lwin Branch) and International Rescue Committee.
Knowledge, attitude, practices and coverage of maternal, newborn and child health
care at selected townships in southern Chin State. February 2016.
8. Avery LS1, Du Plessis E, Shaw SY, et al. Enhancing the capacity and effectiveness of
community health volunteers to improve maternal, newborn and child health:
Experience from Kenya. Can J Public Health. 2017 Nov 9;108(4):e427-e434. doi:
10.17269/cjph.108.5578.
Annex
Map of Kanpetlet Township
Map of Paletwa Township
Photos from Field Data Collection